Some Fortune Crypto pricing data is provided by Binance.

Were Ripple’s long-awaited Hinman emails a smoking gun or a ‘nothingburger’?

Leo SchwartzBy Leo SchwartzSenior Writer
Leo SchwartzSenior Writer

Leo Schwartz is a senior writer at Fortune covering fintech, crypto, venture capital, and financial regulation.

Brad Garlinghouse, chief executive officer of Ripple
Brad Garlinghouse, chief executive officer of Ripple
Jordan Vonderhaar—Getty Images

Proof of State is the Wednesday edition of Fortune Crypto where Leo Schwartz delivers insider insights on policy and regulation.

The crypto industry is hungry for a victory against the Securities and Exchange Commission, with many pinning their hopes on the legacy crypto firm Ripple. Founded in 2012, Ripple has long promised that it could fix global payment networks through its cryptocurrency, XRP, although it has become more well known for its string of enforcement settlements and lawsuits, as well as an online army of either impassioned or vicious supporters, depending on whom you ask.

In 2020, the SEC charged Ripple and two of its executives with raising over $1.3 billion through an unregistered digital asset securities offering for XRP. While many crypto projects now point to decentralization as the reason why their tokens are not securities, Ripple has staked out a different approach, instead leaning on a so-called fair notice defense that argues it lacked sufficient information from the SEC to avoid violating the law.

Barring a still-hazy use case, much of Ripple’s business model rests on maintaining the price of XRP, and its executives and legion of acolytes have promoted its case against the SEC as existential for the larger industry. Its lawyers touted one key piece of evidence—emails surrounding a 2018 speech given by an SEC director asserting that Ether was not a security because it had become sufficiently decentralized—as a smoking gun that would dismantle the SEC’s prosecution.

After much legal back-and-forth, Ripple finally convinced a judge that it should be able to release the emails, which detailed agency deliberation over the speech. Finally published yesterday, eager onlookers pored over the documents, with many leaving disappointed at yet another example of a divided agency, but no real bombshell revelations. Gabriel Shapiro, general counsel for crypto firm Delphi Labs, described them on Twitter as a “nothingburger” for Ripple’s case.  

Daniel Davis, a partner at Katten focused on financial markets and regulation, told me the emails will likely aid in Ripple’s fair notice defense, as they detail divided attitudes within the SEC over its crypto approach, as well as an admitted “regulatory gap” in the space. Davis added that details over secondary trading of digital assets could help Ripple’s defense that XRP itself is not a security, even if a judge finds that its initial sale of tokens was an unregistered securities offering. As Davis pointed out, the oranges in the famous Howey test were not an investment contract, but instead the purchase of the orange groves.

Others argued that the emails will aid the crypto industry more broadly than Ripple. One prominent lawyer working in the crypto venture space, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said that Ripple has been trying to undermine decentralization as a key determinant in the Howey test. Yet again, others argued the emails reveal the SEC had largely adopted the decentralization approach internally—something that benefits the industry and projects like Ethereum, which have moved toward decentralization, but not Ripple.

The bigger issue, in the lawyer’s mind, has been Ripple’s effort to conflate its case with the rest of the industry. The lawyer noted that Ripple does not really reflect other crypto firms’ plight against the SEC, because of Ripple’s unabashed centralization, but that many onlookers fear speaking out because of the vitriolic response they receive from the XRP Army on social media.

“It’s upsetting because bullying in a lot of senses has worked by basically silencing people,” the lawyer said. “The industry generally thinks that the case is more important than it is because Ripple has kind of obfuscated what the actual things that are going on in the case are.”

Leo Schwartz
leo.schwartz@fortune.com
@leomschwartz

DECENTRALIZED NEWS

An analysis shows how Changpeng Zhao’s ties to a web of Binance entities could expose him to liability in potential Department of Justice criminal charges. (Fortune)

Additional charges against Sam Bankman-Fried could face an extra delay after a judgment from the Bahamas Supreme Court allowing him to review the terms of his extradition. (CoinDesk

Binance.US and the SEC agreed to work on a deal to avoid a total asset freeze, which the agency had requested, after a court hearing on Tuesday. (Bloomberg)

Connext Labs raised $7.5 billion at a $250 million valuation to build the “HTTP of Web3,” with backers including Polychain Capital. (Fortune)

The SEC told Coinbase that it needs additional time to respond to its petition for rulemaking, describing the company’s assertions as “baseless.” (Blockworks

MEME O’ THE MOMENT

We’re all trying to find the guy who did this:

This is the web version of Fortune Crypto, a daily newsletter. Sign up here to get it delivered free to your inbox.