CEOs commenting on Israel-Gaza war are being attacked on all sides

Nicholas GordonBy Nicholas GordonAsia Editor
Nicholas GordonAsia Editor

Nicholas Gordon is an Asia editor based in Hong Kong, where he helps to drive Fortune’s coverage of Asian business and economics news.

Top communications advisers are fielding nonstop questions from CEOs on how to handle the conflict in Israel.
Top communications advisers are fielding nonstop questions from CEOs on how to handle the conflict in Israel.
Adam Gray—AFP via Getty Images

Good morning.

Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine created the biggest geopolitical shockwave for business in decades. So it’s jarring that just a year and a half later, CEOs find themselves in the midst of another geopolitical shockwave nearly as large. This time, though, it’s not the direct economic impact that’s making the waves. The war has not spread—yet—to other parts of the region, and oil prices—so far—have remained calm. Instead, CEOs are struggling to manage a different problem—a boiling caldron of outrage that is roiling their teams, many of whom have been directly or indirectly affected by the conflict.

In the days after Oct. 7, some 150 companies issued statements condemning Hamas for its brutal attack on Israeli civilians. Now, many of those same companies are under pressure to issue equal condemnations of the bloodshed in Gaza. Companies that have said nothing are being attacked by both sides. Google CEO Sundar Pichai tried to walk the line by creating a fund to give grants to nonprofits benefitting civilians in Israel and Gaza—but was still attacked by employees for tilting too far towards Israel, which is a significant customer for Google cloud services. Starbucks took the unusual step of suing its own employees’ union after the group posted social media messages declaring “Solidarity with Palestine.”

Top communications advisers tell me they are fielding nonstop questions from CEOs on a broadening array of related issues. Does the killing of innocent women and children in Gaza merit any less outrage from corporate communicators than the killing of innocent women and children in Israel? If employees use internal company communication channels to push for the rights of Palestinians, is that inherently offensive to Jewish employees? Do statements of support for Israel translate into a denial of the rights of Palestinians? Should employees be allowed to participate in proliferating protests staged by both sides? Emotions on these issues are running high, and employees are looking to their employers for support.

There are no easy answers here…as college administrators have already learned. (Read about hedge fund manager Bill Ackman’s latest attack on Harvard here.) Indeed, as the carnage in Gaza grows, and antisemitic reactions spread, emotions will only become more intense and the answers will only get harder. It shows why CEOs in our most recent survey ranked geopolitics as their top challenge.

More news below. And for those interested in better understanding the mess unfolding in the Middle East, I’d recommend David Remnick’s excellent report in The New Yorker, which you can read here.


Alan Murray
@alansmurray

alan.murray@fortune.com

TOP NEWS

Berkshire’s investment crash

Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway lost $23.5 billion from its investments last quarter, driven by a 12% drop in the value of its stake in Apple, now worth $157 billion. Still, the losses were offset by a recovery in the conglomerate’s insurance business, helping to lead to a $12.8 billion net loss for the quarter. Berkshire’s cash hoard also grew to a record $157.2 billion. The New York Times

Singapore’s new prime minister

Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong is stepping down as early as November next year, putting an end-date on a years-long leadership transition. Lee will hand the position over to finance minister Lawrence Wong, ahead of elections in 2025. Lee served as Singapore’s prime minister for almost 20 years, including during the 2008 Global Financial Crisis and the COVID pandemic. South China Morning Post

Novo Nordisk’s warning

The drugmaker behind Ozempic will shift expansion plans to the U.S. if Europe passes its drug regulations plans, Novo Nordisk CEO Lars Fruergaard Jørgensen said on Friday. The Danish company already conducts most of its drug research in Boston, he continued. The European Union earlier this year said it will cut the exclusivity period for new drugs from 10 to eight years as part of a package of reforms to create a “single market for medicines” across the bloc. Financial Times

AROUND THE WATERCOOLER

Tech bros are spending millions to shoot for immortality. These women are besting them in the longevity game—but don’t call them ‘biohackers’ by Alexa Mikhail

Victoria’s Secret, the hypersexualized iconic millennial brand, tried to remake itself as feminist—and Gen Z saw right through it by Paige Hagy

‘The Genius of Israel’ book excerpt: A vibrant economy and tech sector with roots in regular military service by Dan Senor and Saul Singer

Meet the ultra-commuters who start their day at 5 a.m.: It costs them time and thousands of dollars, but they say it makes them better at their jobs—and happier too by Eleanor Pringle

Mortgage rates are dropping fast after a shock jobs report set off a series of dominoes on Wall Street—The housing market can thank Detroit’s striking auto workers by Will Daniel and Irina Ivanova

Gen Z could wave goodbye to résumés because most companies have turned to skills-based recruitment—and find it more effective, research shows by Orianna Rosa Royle

This edition of CEO Daily was curated by Nicholas Gordon. 

This is the web version of CEO Daily, a newsletter of must-read insights from Fortune CEO Alan Murray. Sign up to get it delivered free to your inbox.