The departure of high performers could leave other top talent looking for the door

What if I told you researchers could predict who will quit next? A recent study published in the Academy of Management Journal finds that turnover begets more turnover. And the people who decide to quit are highly influenced by who, voluntarily or involuntarily, left the company before them. As leaders toil with the idea of layoffs, experts say it behooves CHROs to pause and think about what other attrition trends they could inadvertently cause.

Employees leave a company in three ways: resignation, dismissal, or larger layoffs. Sima Sajjadiani, a report coauthor, says each form of attrition comes with its own disruption and additional employee exits. Even the decampments that appear to be innocuous can lead to an unanticipated outflow of talent. 

She and her team were most surprised by the effect that high performers can have on other high performers. When high-achieving employees leave a company, it’s more likely that other top employees will also voluntarily leave. “We expected to see that when high-quality human capital leaves the organization, it influences both high-performers and low-performers equally. But we were surprised that people within the same quality of human capital were affected most,” she says. “High-quality performers are impacted more than low-quality performers.”

The voluntary turnover signals to fellow high-achievers that there are other, possibly greater, opportunities to be found outside a given company. This, of course, is bad news for employers, but Sajjadiani says employers can prevent this bleeding of talent, starting with communication.

Simply communicating openly and transparently with employees (as much as legally possible) about why an individual left or was dismissed from a company goes a long way to calming unrest and warding off a large outflow of talent. “When someone is dismissed, the reasons must be communicated,” Sajjadiani shares.

But not all attrition is bad attrition. The researchers found that when employers dismissed low-performers, employees reported feeling happier and stayed with an employer longer. Plus, other poor performers tended to quit, fearing they might be next.

“It’s contagious. It’s like a snowball effect,” says Sajjadiani.

Amber Burton
amber.burton@fortune.com
@amberbburton

Reporter's Notebook

The most compelling data, quotes, and insights from the field.

Employees and employers alike are still smitten with the four-day workweek pilot in the U.K. Over 90% of companies say they'll continue to uphold the shortened workweek after the trial. 

“Fifteen percent of the employees who participated said ‘no amount of money’ would convince them to go back to working five days a week.” Washington Post

Around the Table

A round-up of the most important HR headlines, studies, podcasts, and long-reads.

- Illinois is expected to pass a law offering all workers up to 40 hours of PTO a year. CBS

- Employees on understaffed teams struggle to balance doing their job and filling still-open positions. BBC

- Formerly empathetic managers are now reverting to hard-driving ways. Time

- Even though some companies cut jobs, their workforce barely shrank months later. Wall Street Journal

- Ad agencies blame remote work for their struggle to identify junior and mid-level employees to promote. Ad Age

Watercooler

Everything you need to know from Fortune.

CTO wanted. Although chief technology officers are among the most in-demand positions, companies struggle to retain them. —Paige McGlauflin

Billion-dollar raise. Home Depot announced it would spend $1 billion on raises to retain and recruit employees in the tight labor market. —Dee-Ann Durbin

Cashing in on WFH. Workers in metro areas can save over $4,000 a year by working remotely, according to a Work From Home Research report. —Chloe Berger

Death, taxes, and robots. Sen. Bernie Sanders (D-Vt.) joined Bill Gates in calling for a new tax on companies that transition their workforces from humans to robots. —Tristan Bove