• Home
  • Latest
  • Fortune 500
  • Finance
  • Tech
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
Commentary

Stop shaming corporations with meaninglessly low effective tax rates

By
Andrew Belnap
Andrew Belnap
and
Jeff Hoopes
Jeff Hoopes
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Andrew Belnap
Andrew Belnap
and
Jeff Hoopes
Jeff Hoopes
Down Arrow Button Icon
October 1, 2021, 6:06 AM ET
Large tax expenditures that favor major corporations and wealthy individuals could be eliminated, but massive political power keeps them in place.
Large tax expenditures that favor major corporations and wealthy individuals could be eliminated, but massive political power keeps them in place.Bloomberg - Getty Images

The news is often filled with bad stories, so how about a good one? We’ve already heard that there are big profitable corporations that pay no tax, but did you know that some companies generously share their profits with the government out of the goodness of their corporate hearts?

Since 2017, when Congress lowered the statutory corporate tax rate to 21%, VF Corp. (the maker of brands such as North Face and Vans) had a domestic effective tax rate of 174%. In other words, it expensed 174% of pre-tax domestic profit in U.S. taxes.  

Cisco and Western Digital had effective tax rates of 67% and 236%, respectively. The corporate generosity posterchild, Merck, had a rate of 303%. Sensing our country’s deep budget problems, these companies dug deep and gave until it hurt. We should move them to the top of the world’s most admired companies. 

This is, of course, a load of hooey. These effective tax rates are real, but the corporations are not overly generous. Such rates are generally the simple result of following the tax law. One-time items, nuances of the law, and the effects of the tax reform itself can all lead to absurdly high percentages.  

However, here’s an important fact: an effective tax rate is not some simple measure of all we need to know about a company’s taxes. It’s a complex combination of millions, if not billions, of transactions, simultaneously filtered through the politically motivated tax code and financial accounting rules. This means that calls for new tax rules because a few companies had extremely low tax rates for several years are simply not serious tax policy material. Although looking at effective tax rates is useful, considering only the extremes yields meaningless statistics–unless you look at what caused the very high, or, very low rates.  

For example, the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy recently reported that 39 profitable corporations paid no federal income tax since 2017. First on their alphabetical list, Advanced Micro Devices paid no taxes on U.S. pre-tax financial accounting income of $1.7 billion from 2018 to 2020. However, as AMD’s latest annual report makes clear, it has $5.5 billion in U.S. net operating losses. In other words, even though AMD is profitable today, it has had huge losses in the past, and our tax system rightly allows companies to offset current income with past losses.  

Hence, AMD’s low tax rate is probably not indicative of nefarious tax avoidance. Rather, it represents the use of a standard feature of almost every tax code on Earth: net operating losses.  

There will always be extremes in effective tax rates, with some corporations having very low and very high rates at different times. Why these rates are so low almost always has a straightforward explanation rarely stemming from tax evasion, tax fraud, or even aggressive tax avoidance. 

Two recent academic papers highlight this fact. One looks at companies that pay nothing in taxes and finds they result from “nonaggressive means.” The other study finds that companies with very low rates “are primarily benefiting from… benign tax position[s].” Both studies conclude that aggressive international tax planning is not the root of these low tax rates. 

To be clear, our tax system could use some help. The IRS is underfunded and stretched thin, administering both the tax code and vast social welfare programs. Large tax expenditures that favor major corporations and wealthy individual taxpayers could be eliminated, but massive political power keeps them in place. Both Democrats and Republicans pushed for tax cuts favoring the wealthy in recent months.

Some companies certainly do aggressively avoid taxes, but vilifying corporations with low rates without any actual evidence of wrongdoing is counterproductive. Equally silly, is exalting companies with 303% tax rates. We need to have conversations about real tax issues, and not bandy about misleading statistics that divert attention from the true problems with our corporate tax code.  

Andrew Belnap is an assistant professor of accounting in the McCombs School of Business at The University of Texas at Austin.  

Jeff Hoopes is an associate professor of accounting at the University of North Carolina’s Kenan-Flagler School of Business and the research director of the UNC Tax Center. 

More must-read commentary published by Fortune:

  • Historically Black colleges can’t solve tech’s diversity problem alone
  • Three simple steps for managers to get vaccine mandates right
  • Congress can ensure our children thrive by empowering their educators
  • When intelligence agencies co-opt business, the consequences can be deadly
  • The Congressional Black Caucus is more important than ever

Subscribe to Fortune Daily to get essential business stories straight to your inbox each morning.

About the Authors
By Andrew Belnap
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
By Jeff Hoopes
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in Commentary

Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025

Most Popular

Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

Latest in Commentary

Jamie Dimon
CommentaryCorporate Governance
Jamie Dimon’s bombshell on proxy advisory delivers a body blow to the firms he called ‘incompetent’
By Richard TorrenzanoJanuary 7, 2026
1 day ago
fraser
CommentaryLeadership
The 7 most overlooked CEOs in 2025—and the 5 to watch in 2026
By Jeffrey Sonnenfeld and Stephen HenriquesJanuary 7, 2026
2 days ago
christian klein
CommentarySoftware
The most honest prediction for 2026: nobody knows what’s next
By Christian KleinJanuary 7, 2026
2 days ago
CES
CommentaryRobots
Beyond the CES hype: why home robots need the self-driving car playbook
By Jason CorsoJanuary 6, 2026
3 days ago
AsiaTariffs and trade
Countries must move beyond seeing AI as a race, where one side must beat the other
By Boris Babic and Brian WongJanuary 3, 2026
5 days ago
trump
CommentaryVenezuela
5 takeaways on Venezuela in the aftermath of Maduro: A memo to CEOs
By Jeffrey SonnenfeldJanuary 3, 2026
5 days ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Law
Amazon is cutting checks to millions of customers as part of a $2.5 billion FTC settlement. Here's who qualifies and how to get paid
By Sydney LakeJanuary 6, 2026
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Future of Work
AI layoffs are looking more and more like corporate fiction that's masking a darker reality, Oxford Economics suggests
By Nick LichtenbergJanuary 7, 2026
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
Mark Cuban on the $38 trillion national debt and the absurdity of U.S. healthcare: we wouldn't pay for potato chips like this
By Nick LichtenbergJanuary 6, 2026
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Future of Work
'Employers are increasingly turning to degree and GPA' in hiring: Recruiters retreat from ‘talent is everywhere,’ double down on top colleges
By Jake AngeloJanuary 6, 2026
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Success
Diary of a CEO founder says he hired someone with 'zero' work experience because she 'thanked the security guard by name' before the interview
By Emma BurleighJanuary 8, 2026
9 hours ago
placeholder alt text
Personal Finance
Current price of silver as of Wednesday, January 7, 2026
By Joseph HostetlerJanuary 7, 2026
1 day ago

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.