• Home
  • Latest
  • Fortune 500
  • Finance
  • Tech
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
LeadershipPolitics

America’s Ultra Rich Have a Message for 2020 Candidates

By
Natasha Bach
Natasha Bach
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Natasha Bach
Natasha Bach
Down Arrow Button Icon
June 24, 2019, 4:47 PM ET

In 2017, President Donald Trump and the Republican Party passed a tax bill that dramatically lowered taxes for some Americans—and American corporations.

But now some of these same Americans are sending the government a different message: tax us more.

Eighteen Americans, representing some of the wealthiest in the country, published an open letter on Medium on Monday calling on the 2020 presidential candidates to raise taxes on the richest Americans.

“We are writing to call on all candidates for President, whether they are Republicans or Democrats, to support a moderate wealth tax on the fortunes of the richest 1/10 of the richest 1% of Americans — on us,” the letter reads. “The next dollar of new tax revenue should come from the most financially fortunate, not from middle-income and lower-income Americans.”

The “us” includes the likes of George Soros, Abigail Disney, Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes, members of the Pritzker family, and Molly Munger, daughter of Berkshire Hathaway vice-chairman Charlie Munger.

A moderate wealth tax on the richest Americans would provide much needed funds to deal with the climate crisis, among other things. https://t.co/83Qd3Ps4Q1https://t.co/KhmJyYDRds

— George Soros (@georgesoros) June 24, 2019

“America has a moral, ethical and economic responsibility to tax our wealth more,” the letter continues. “A wealth tax could help address the climate crisis, improve the economy, improve health outcomes, fairly create opportunity, and strengthen our democratic freedoms. Instituting a wealth tax is in the interest of our republic.”

The signers refer specifically to Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s wealth tax proposal, while clearly noting that this does not represent an endorsement for the candidate. The proposal would levy a two-cent tax on the dollar on assets over $50 million and an addition 1 cent on the dollar on any assets exceeding $1 billion. The tax would affect an estimated 75,000 families, raising $2.75 trillion over 10 years.

That such a “moderate tax on a minuscule number of Americans,” the signers said, could lead to such a dramatic increase in revenue is a reflection of growing income inequality in the U.S. The signers add that the “top 1/10 of 1% of households now have almost as much wealth as all Americans in the bottom 90%,” and while they “enjoy uncommon fortunes…[they] want to live in an America that solves the biggest challenges of our common future.”

A working paperby the National Bureau of Economic Research echoes this point, finding that the top 0.1% of Americans hold close to 20% of the country’s wealth, which is equal to the wealth of the bottom 90%. This is due in no small part to rising income inequality. An analysis of a Federal Reserve report found that between 1989 and 2018 the top 1% saw its total net worth increase by $21 trillion—the bottom 50%, meanwhile, saw its net worth decrease by $900 billion.

As such, the letter’s signers explain that they believe that a wealth tax is both fair and patriotic. These two points are among the six listed reasons that the signers note they support a wealth tax. The other reasons include using the revenue from the tax as a tool to combat the climate crisis, because it helps the economy, makes a healthier America, and strengthens American democracy.

Above all, they note that the arguments against “are mostly technical and often overstated.” And the people agree: most Americans want the wealthiest among us to pay higher taxes.

More must-read stories from Fortune:

—Trump’s MAGA rallies cost big bucks—and cities foot the bills

—Black women voters will be central to the 2020 election, experts predict

—Can Trump fire Fed Chair Jerome Powell? What history tells us

—Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s message for democrats after “boy bye” tweet

—What you need to know about the upcoming 2020 primary debates

Get up to speed on your morning commute with Fortune’sCEO Daily newsletter.

About the Author
By Natasha Bach
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in Leadership

Nicholas Thompson
C-SuiteBook Excerpt
I took over one of the most prestigious media firms while training for an ultramarathon. Here’s what I learned becoming CEO of The Atlantic
By Nicholas ThompsonDecember 13, 2025
13 hours ago
Lauren Antonoff
SuccessCareers
Once a college dropout, this CEO went back to school at 52—but she still says the Gen Zers who will succeed are those who ‘forge their own path’
By Preston ForeDecember 13, 2025
14 hours ago
Asiathe future of work
The CEO of one of Asia’s largest co-working space providers says his business has more in common with hotels
By Angelica AngDecember 12, 2025
22 hours ago
Donald Trump
HealthHealth Insurance
‘Tragedy in the making’: Top healthcare exec on why insurance will spike to subsidize a tax cut to millionaires and billionaires
By Nick LichtenbergDecember 12, 2025
1 day ago
three men in suits, one gesturing
AIBrainstorm AI
The fastest athletes in the world can botch a baton pass if trust isn’t there—and the same is true of AI, Blackbaud exec says
By Amanda GerutDecember 12, 2025
1 day ago
Brainstorm AI panel
AIBrainstorm AI
Creative workers won’t be replaced by AI—but their roles will change to become ‘directors’ managing AI agents, executives say
By Beatrice NolanDecember 12, 2025
1 day ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Economy
Tariffs are taxes and they were used to finance the federal government until the 1913 income tax. A top economist breaks it down
By Kent JonesDecember 12, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Success
Apple cofounder Ronald Wayne sold his 10% stake for $800 in 1976—today it’d be worth up to $400 billion
By Preston ForeDecember 12, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Success
40% of Stanford undergrads receive disability accommodations—but it’s become a college-wide phenomenon as Gen Z try to succeed in the current climate
By Preston ForeDecember 12, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
The Fed just ‘Trump-proofed’ itself with a unanimous move to preempt a potential leadership shake-up
By Jason MaDecember 12, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
For the first time since Trump’s tariff rollout, import tax revenue has fallen, threatening his lofty plans to slash the $38 trillion national debt
By Sasha RogelbergDecember 12, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Success
Apple CEO Tim Cook out-earns the average American’s salary in just 7 hours—to put that into context, he could buy a new $439,000 home in just 2 days
By Emma BurleighDecember 12, 2025
1 day ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.