• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
LeadershipPolitics

Remember When the U.S. Government Paid for Childcare?

By
Francesca Levy
Francesca Levy
and
Bloomberg
Bloomberg
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Francesca Levy
Francesca Levy
and
Bloomberg
Bloomberg
Down Arrow Button Icon
May 15, 2019, 6:11 AM ET
Woman Reading Story to Three Young Children at Child Care Center, New Britain, Connecticut, June 1943
Woman Reading Story to Three Young Children at Child Care Center, New Britain, Connecticut, USA, Gordon Parks for Office of War Information, June 1943. Universal History Archive UIG via Getty Images

During World War II, the influx of women into the American workforce solved one problem—the labor shortage—while creating another: With women off to the factories, who would watch the kids?

When millions of women flocked to coastal cities to build ships, planes and artillery, many left behind the networks of friends and families who might’ve helped care for their children. Without them, some workers just parked their kids in cars outside factories and schools. Others sent them off to the movies for hours and hours.

So the U.S. government stepped in. Congress quietly added funding for community-based childcare centers in the Lanham Act, a wartime bill to support large-scale infrastructure projects. But even after he funding was in place, the public wasn’t sold.

“The idea that the government would be involved in childcare was a pretty radical concept, and it was not an easy sell,” says Lincoln Cushing, an archivist at Kaiser Permanente who has studied this period in the company’s history. During the war, Kaiser (then called The Kaiser Company) was building ships for the merchant marines. It used the government subsidies to build state-of-the art on-site day care centers for hundreds of employees’ children.

The widespread view of childcare at the time was that it was cruel, custodial, a last-ditch option for the poor or desperate. Most people still believed that in order to grow up safe, happy and well-adjusted, children should be cared for by a mother who stayed home full-time.

But Kaiser’s centers set a high standard of care, slowly eroding the public stigma. The inviting spaces were designed by famous architects. Warm meals, educational activities and structured play time filled children’s days until it was time to go home. The hours of care were accommodating to women’s round-the-clock shifts, and for a small fee, they would provide mothers with a hot meal to take home for dinner after they picked up the kids.

Studies of the centers showed that fears they would harm children were misplaced. In one study, teachers observed that 75 percent of kids made noticeable social progress. And researchers who interviewed 500 mothers with children in the centers found that every single one said their kids enjoyed nursery school. Many said they became better mothers.

When the war ended, so did the funding for childcare centers. But in the few short years they were around, the publicly-funded day cares changed the way Americans thought about childcare. In 2019, the grim reputation that once tainted communal care is largely gone. More than 70% of children between 3 and 5 go to daycare or preschool—while their parents go to work.

More must-read stories from Fortune:

—How civil rights and liberties activists are taking on Capitol Hill

—What exactly is ranked-choice voting?

—21 abortion restrictions have already been enacted in 2019

—Should Title VII civil rights protections include the LGBTQ community?

—Human Trafficking is an epidemic in the U.S. It’s also big business

About the Authors
By Francesca Levy
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
By Bloomberg
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in Leadership

CryptoBinance
Binance has been proudly nomadic for years. A new announcement suggests it’s finally chosen a headquarters
By Ben WeissDecember 7, 2025
6 hours ago
Future of WorkJamie Dimon
Jamie Dimon says even though AI will eliminate some jobs ‘maybe one day we’ll be working less hard but having wonderful lives’
By Jason MaDecember 7, 2025
16 hours ago
business
C-Suitechief executive officer (CEO)
Inside the Fortune 500 CEO pressure cooker: surviving is harder than ever and requires an ‘odd combination’ of traits
By Nick LichtenbergDecember 7, 2025
20 hours ago
Alex Amouyel is the President and CEO of Newman’s Own Foundation
Commentaryphilanthropy
Following in Paul Newman and Yvon Chouinard’s footsteps: There are more ways for leaders to give it away in ‘the Great Boomer Fire Sale’ than ever
By Alex AmouyelDecember 7, 2025
21 hours ago
Hank Green sipping tea
SuccessPersonal Finance
Millionaire YouTuber Hank Green tells Gen Z to rethink their Tesla bets—and shares the portfolio changes he’s making to avoid AI-bubble fallout
By Preston ForeDecember 7, 2025
22 hours ago
MagazineWarren Buffett
Warren Buffett: Business titan and cover star
By Indrani SenDecember 7, 2025
23 hours ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Real Estate
The 'Great Housing Reset' is coming: Income growth will outpace home-price growth in 2026, Redfin forecasts
By Nino PaoliDecember 6, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
AI
Nvidia CEO says data centers take about 3 years to construct in the U.S., while in China 'they can build a hospital in a weekend'
By Nino PaoliDecember 6, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
The most likely solution to the U.S. debt crisis is severe austerity triggered by a fiscal calamity, former White House economic adviser says
By Jason MaDecember 6, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon says Europe has a 'real problem’
By Katherine Chiglinsky and BloombergDecember 6, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Politics
Supreme Court to reconsider a 90-year-old unanimous ruling that limits presidential power on removing heads of independent agencies
By Mark Sherman and The Associated PressDecember 7, 2025
18 hours ago
placeholder alt text
Big Tech
Mark Zuckerberg rebranded Facebook for the metaverse. Four years and $70 billion in losses later, he’s moving on
By Eva RoytburgDecember 5, 2025
3 days ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.