Skip to Content

The Ledger: A Battle Brews Between Facebook and WeChat, Paxos Gold, Andrew Yang

There’s a war brewing among the tech giants over payments, and it has big implications for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. The latest salvo came last week when Facebook’s CEO announced a new strategy focused on messaging and privacy.

The privacy pledge is likely nonsense and distracts from Facebook’s real pivot, which is all about money and shopping. As Fortune’s China correspondent, Clay Chandler, astutely noted this weekend, “Mark Zuckerberg Has WeChat Envy.” In the post, Clay pointed out how WeChat (a.k.a. “one app to rule them all“) has built-in payment features that make it more powerful than a simple ad-based social network like Facebook.

WeChat isn’t the only Target of Facebook’s payment ambitions. As others have observed, Zuckerberg’s announcement was a shot across the bow of Apple, and turned up the heat in “tech’s next big rivalry.” This rivalry is driven by Facebook’s desire to replicate the walled garden of iMessage, where people are spending a growing amount of time—and where Apple can leverage its well-established payment platform, Apple Pay.

Facebook’s push into payments is all the more interesting given its blockchain ambitions. The company’s growing blockchain team recently topped 60 employees, and is poised to hire dozens more. There are also plans for Facebook Coin, a native crypto currency that, as Robert noted last week, could be used to pay people for their data.

All of this raises the question of how Bitcoin, Ether and other traditional cryptocurrencies will fit into the payment battles among the tech companies. Consider, for instance, how these currencies offer secure and trusted payment networks with open protocols that could integrated as a feature into the tech giants’ existing apps. Adding the Bitcoin network within one of the tech giants’ wallets would be a boon for users and give the currency a big boost too.

In the case of Facebook, though, a tie-up is unlikely given that its core business turns on centralization and surveillance—two qualities that are anathema to the vision of Satoshi Nakamoto’s free and open currency. Hence, Facebook Coin, when it arrives, is likely to be a tightly controlled corporate currency that will be disdained by Bitcoin believers.

There could be an opening for Apple, however. The company under CEO Tim Cook has made privacy part of its brand, and Apple is not addicted to data like Facebook is. Adding Bitcoin functionality to the Apple Pay wallet would boost the company’s privacy bona fides, and could be a quick way for it to get into the blockchain game. And just imagine what it would do for blockchain infrastructure if mighty Apple started scooping up crypto companies.

None of this may come to pass, of course. The tech giants may spurn technologies like Bitcoin they can’t control, and instead expend their energy into roping consumers into their own private payment fiefdoms. Meanwhile, long time Bitcoin fans will be suspicious of corporate coins from the likes of Facebook, and will shun them out of principle.

Nonetheless, there is so much blockchain building going on, and the push to remake payments is so strong, it’s hard not think some sort of convergence between tech giants and cryptocurrencies lies on the horizon.


Send feedback and tips to, find us on Twitter @FortuneLedger or email/DM me directly at the contact info below. Please tell your friends to subscribe.

Jeff John Roberts


Identity Management Firm Okta Acquires Workflow Automation Startup for $52.5 Million By Robert Hackett

Why The Fintech Revolution Is For Real: 3 Trends to Watch By Mark Goldberg

Bumble Bee Foods Aims to Put All Its Fish on a Blockchain, Starting With Fair Trade Tuna By Robert Hackett


To the Moon… College kids still mining crypto like crazy. Argentina is giving out crypto grants with Binance. Crypto insurance is gaining traction. Women see crypto as a means to financial inclusion. eToro launches crypto trading, including its ‘CopyTrader’ feature, in 30 states. Bitcoin is $350 away from a bull market.

…Rekt. Quadriga’s felon co-founder made multi-million dollar trades on BitMEX. Crypto-miner Coinhive is shutting down. Enterprise blockchain company SETL is toast. Ripple CEO throws shade on JPM Coin (“just use dollars!”). Feds confirm that, yup, OneCoin is a criminal pyramid scheme. Fintech unicorn Revolut responds to its “week from hell.” Philly just banned cashless stores.


Click to watch^

Paxos, best-known for its early introduction of a stablecoin, is now teeing up tokens backed by precious metals—think Gold Coin, Silver Coin and so on. CEO Chad Cascarilla dropped by Fortune’s Balancing The Ledger studio to explain how this will work.


Locking up the crypto 2020 vote?  Andrew Yang is one of the long shot candidates vying to win the Democratic primary. An entrepreneur and technophile, Yang is also something of a weirdo—just the sort of guy, in other words, to charm the crypto crowd. A satire of his eccentric tweets are starting to show up on crypto Twitter. Alas, he’s also become meme fodder for the 4Chan fever swamps. A sample from the satire account:

Yang’s real Twitter account is here.


Fidelity opens its custody shop: Every month it feels like the mainstream financial firms are inching further into crypto. The latest example is investment stalwart Fidelity, which is now offering custody of Bitcoin to a handful of crypto hedge funds. In an interview with The Block, Fidelity’s crypto chief Tom Jessop suggested what might come next:

[W]e’ve seen interest from hedge funds that have convinced their management to allocate reasonably large amounts of capital to the asset class, which is a positive. We have gotten inquiries from family offices, some of whom already are allocated, and want to move assets into our custody, others that have dollar-based mandates, but won’t activate until there’s a custodian.

Then, we’re also seeing, quite frankly, even from the advisor community, interest from financial advisors, and then a little bit from the pension and endowment world. I wouldn’t say that those are clients that have done their work and are ready to allocate, but I think more have done work, and as part of their exploration are talking to service providers. That to me is kind of the most interesting. If you had asked me six months ago, or nine months ago if we’d be talking to pensions and endowments, I probably would have said “unlikely.”

We hope you enjoyed this edition of The Ledger. Find past editions here, and sign up for other Fortune newsletters here. Question, suggestion, or feedback? Drop us a line.

An earlier version of this post failed to flag that the Andrew Yang tweets in the screenshot were from a satire account.