• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia

Simon Malls Forcing Starbucks to Keep 77 Failing Teavana Stores Open

By
John Patrick Pullen
John Patrick Pullen
By
John Patrick Pullen
John Patrick Pullen
December 4, 2017, 6:45 PM ET

In the face of a retail industry apocalypse, Simon Property Group is fighting back. An Indiana judge ruled in favor of the Indianapolis-based mall operator Monday, forcing Starbucks to keep 77 failing Teavana stores open and honoring their leases. The Seattle-based coffee chain announced it planned to close all 379 Teavana locations in July. In August, Simon malls countered with a lawsuit.

Simon sought injunctions from the Indianapolis-based court, preventing the coffee company’s store closings by alleging Starbucks was “shirking its contractual obligations at the expense of Simon’s shopping centers and the dozens of communities they serve and support.”

Noting the distress that the retail industry finds itself in, the mall operator acknowledged that it had experienced many store closings in recent years. But the difference between those retailers and Starbucks was that the former were under financial stress, according to the property company. “That obviously is not the case with Starbucks, which is one of the largest and most recognized companies in the world,” the lawsuit said.

Teavana, which was bought by Starbucks for $620 million in 2013, has since seen a decline it its foot traffic, particularly in malls. Earlier this year, disappointing financials raised alarms at the parent company, and some now think we may even be at ‘peak Starbucks.’

If that’s the case, the Teavana ruling might complicate things for future Starbucks—and other store—closures, as commercial real estate owners look to minimize their losses.

“If you are a tenant that has to close a bunch of stores that are based in malls, you are pretty scared after this ruling,” The New York Post reported an anonymous source as saying.

“We are disappointed in the judge’s ruling and will continue to focus on finding a resolution,” said Starbucks in a statement. There has been no word yet on whether Starbucks will file and appeal.

About the Author
By John Patrick Pullen
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.