• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
TechSecurity

Clients Sue Lawyer With AOL Email Burned by Cyber Scammers

By
Jeff John Roberts
Jeff John Roberts
Editor, Finance and Crypto
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Jeff John Roberts
Jeff John Roberts
Editor, Finance and Crypto
Down Arrow Button Icon
April 19, 2016, 2:05 PM ET
AOL AIM logo
<h1>Netscape</h1> AOL got itself a fading web browser and has-been website when it acquired Netscape Communications in 1999 for nearly $10 billion. What were AOL executives thinking? It's not exactly clear other than a failed effort to remake Netscape into a web portal and some vague comments about e-commerce. AOL was eventually able to wring some money out of <a href="http://money.cnn.com/quote/quote.html?symb=MSFT&amp;source=story_quote_link" title="">Microsoft</a> for antitrust violations during the browser war era and some more last year for Netscape's patents. But the acquisition remains a big loser while Netscape, the browser, is long dead.Photo: Philipp Guelland/AFP/Getty Images

A New York lawyer is learning a hard lesson in cybersecurity after criminals broke into her AOL email and used it to trick her wealthy real estate clients into wiring nearly $2 million to Chinese hackers. Now, those clients are suing the lawyer for malpractice.

In a lawsuit filed on Monday, New York City couple Robert and Bethany Millard accuse their former lawyer, Patricia Doran, of failing to take basic steps to secure her computer and protect them from an elaborate wire fraud.

According to the complaint, AOL (VZ) email accounts are “notoriously vulnerable” to hacking, yet Doran relied on AOL for sensitive communications involving the Millards’ purchase of a $19,380,000 condo. These allegedly poor security practices allowed hackers to impersonate Doran, according to the filing, tricking the Millards with a series of emails that persuaded them to wire a $1.9 million deposit into a fraudulent bank account.

Get Data Sheet, Fortune’s technology newsletter.

The Millards claim Doran should have done more to protect her email:

The lack of basic cybersecurity measures or awareness also meant that this hack was not detected by Doran. These cybercriminals then learned when and how the Millards intended to pay for the Apartment, knowledge that permitted them to pose as the seller’s attorneys and thereby steal the Millards’ money.

The couple also claims Doran failed to detect a fake confirmation email from the scammers even though it contained several “red flags,” including misspelling of attorney names and a message that it would be impossible to reach the sellers’ lawyers. Doran did not spot the fraud, the suit notes, but instead simply forwarded the email to the Millards. Nor, the plaintiffs say, did she react upon receiving a fax from the seller’s real attorneys that mentioned the contract would not be complete until receipt of a down payment.

For cybersecurity tips from an ex-con, watch:

The couple say they learned about the fraud from the bank a day after they transferred the money, at which point they informed Doran what had happened.

The Millards were able to recover most of the stolen money, except for $196,200, which they say has vanished forever into a Chinese bank account. They are asking the court to order Doran, who did not respond to a voicemail request for comment, to make up that amount and to pay punitive damages amid various legal fees.

It is hard not to feel for Doran in this situation. It was a sophisticated scam, and she is hardly the only lawyer in the country behind the curve when it comes to cybersecurity.

Still, in the age of data breaches, every law firm should be taking steps to harden its computer defenses—and better management of email accounts is only the first step.

About the Author
By Jeff John RobertsEditor, Finance and Crypto
LinkedIn iconTwitter icon

Jeff John Roberts is the Finance and Crypto editor at Fortune, overseeing coverage of the blockchain and how technology is changing finance.

See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in Tech

Big TechStreaming
Trump warns Netflix-Warner deal may pose antitrust ‘problem’
By Hadriana Lowenkron, Se Young Lee and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
8 hours ago
Big TechOpenAI
OpenAI goes from stock market savior to burden as AI risks mount
By Ryan Vlastelica and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
8 hours ago
AIData centers
HP’s chief commercial officer predicts the future will include AI-powered PCs that don’t share data in the cloud
By Nicholas GordonDecember 7, 2025
10 hours ago
Future of WorkJamie Dimon
Jamie Dimon says even though AI will eliminate some jobs ‘maybe one day we’ll be working less hard but having wonderful lives’
By Jason MaDecember 7, 2025
14 hours ago
CryptoCryptocurrency
So much of crypto is not even real—but that’s starting to change
By Pete Najarian and Joe BruzzesiDecember 7, 2025
19 hours ago
Elon Musk
Big TechSpaceX
SpaceX to offer insider shares at record-setting $800 billion valuation
By Edward Ludlow, Loren Grush, Lizette Chapman, Eric Johnson and BloombergDecember 6, 2025
1 day ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Real Estate
The 'Great Housing Reset' is coming: Income growth will outpace home-price growth in 2026, Redfin forecasts
By Nino PaoliDecember 6, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
AI
Nvidia CEO says data centers take about 3 years to construct in the U.S., while in China 'they can build a hospital in a weekend'
By Nino PaoliDecember 6, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
The most likely solution to the U.S. debt crisis is severe austerity triggered by a fiscal calamity, former White House economic adviser says
By Jason MaDecember 6, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon says Europe has a 'real problem’
By Katherine Chiglinsky and BloombergDecember 6, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Big Tech
Mark Zuckerberg rebranded Facebook for the metaverse. Four years and $70 billion in losses later, he’s moving on
By Eva RoytburgDecember 5, 2025
3 days ago
placeholder alt text
Politics
Supreme Court to reconsider a 90-year-old unanimous ruling that limits presidential power on removing heads of independent agencies
By Mark Sherman and The Associated PressDecember 7, 2025
17 hours ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.