The companies on the Global 500 employ 70.2 million people, and their revenue represents more than one-third of the world’s GDP.

Fortune Global 500

With a combined revenue of $21 trillion and $2.1 trillion in profits, the 2026 Fortune 500 is the definitive list of America's largest companies.

Fortune 500

The 300 companies on this year’s list brought in over $12.5 trillion in revenue for the latest 12 months, with the median revenue figure at $24 billion.

America's Most Innovative Companies

The corporations on our annual list of the world's 500 largest companies combined to generate $41.7 trillion in revenue over the past year.

Almost $20 trillion in revenue—and a record-breaking $1.87 trillion in profits. Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive list of the biggest companies in America.

The 300 companies on this year’s list brought in over $12.6 trillion in revenue for the latest 12 months, with the median revenue figure at $22 billion.

The corporations on our annual list posted aggregate revenues of $41 trillion for the second year in a row.

The Fortune 500, in its 70th year in 2024, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

The 200 companies on this list are transforming industries from the inside out.

The corporations on our annual list of the world’s largest companies delivered a record $41 trillion in aggregate revenues.

The Fortune 500, in its 69th year in 2023, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

F500-2023-079-Charter Communications

Despite dropping 10 spots on the list, Charter Communications had a strong year with a 4.5% increase in revenues for a total of $54 billion in 2022. The telecommunications provider also saw a change in leadership with former chief operating officer Chris Winfrey taking the role of CEO from retiring predecessor Tom Rutledge (who will remain as executive chairman). 
<ul> 
 	<li>In spring 2022, Charter announced a joint venture with Comcast, its biggest competitor in the cable TV market, for a streaming platform to compete with the likes of Roku, Amazon Fire TV, and Apple TV.</li> 
 	<li>Charter spent $1.8 billion to expand broadband access in rural areas, part of efforts to bring more Americans online (and counter the ongoing decline in cable subscriptions).</li> 
 	<li>Charter launched its first suite of programmatic ad products to keep pace with digital ad sales in the streaming market; its advertising business grew 18.1% in 2022.</li> 
</ul>

Aggregate sales hit $37.8 trillion last year—an increase of 19%, the highest annual growth rate in the list’s history.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 68th running of the list.

F500-2022-069-Charter Communications

Charter Communications, the Stamford, Conn.–based telecommunications giant, dropped five spots on this year’s list. Though it added 1.2 million new internet customers over the course of the year, the company continued to see declines in residential video customers, losing 71,000 in the last quarter of 2021 alone. Still, its revenue increased 7.5% to $51.7 billion, and its profits increased a more dramatic 44.5% to $4.7 billion. In February 2022, the company announced a new $20 standard minimum wage in the face of a continued tight labor market.

Total revenue for the world’s biggest companies fell 4.8% to $31.7 trillion this year—the first decline in half a decade.

G500-2021-230-Charter Communications

<span data-sheets-value="{&quot;1&quot;:2,&quot;2&quot;:&quot;The Connecticut-based telecom giant added a record 2.2 million new Internet customers in its most recent fiscal year. That helped the company bring in $48 billion in revenue, a 5% increase from the year before. Net income also grew significantly—an impressive 93% jump year over year. But the number of video subscribers barely budged. That wasn’t a big surprise, given the continuing cord-cutting trend and the plethora of nontraditional options viewers now have for consuming content. Charter’s average monthly revenue from residential customers was also challenged, dipping slightly from $112.63 per month in 2019 to $111.15 in 2020.&quot;}" data-sheets-userformat="{&quot;2&quot;:14723,&quot;3&quot;:{&quot;1&quot;:0},&quot;4&quot;:{&quot;1&quot;:2,&quot;2&quot;:16777215},&quot;10&quot;:2,&quot;11&quot;:4,&quot;14&quot;:{&quot;1&quot;:2,&quot;2&quot;:0},&quot;15&quot;:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;16&quot;:11}">The Connecticut-based telecom giant added a record 2.2 million new Internet customers in its most recent fiscal year. That helped the company bring in $48 billion in revenue, a 5% increase from the year before. Net income also grew significantly—an impressive 93% jump year over year. But the number of video subscribers barely budged. That wasn’t a big surprise, given the continuing cord-cutting trend and the plethora of nontraditional options viewers now have for consuming content. Charter’s average monthly revenue from residential customers was also challenged, dipping slightly from $112.63 per month in 2019 to $111.15 in 2020.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 67th running of the list.

F500-2021-64-Charter Communications

This year's Fortune Global 500 generated $33.3 trillion in revenues and $2.1 trillion in profits.

G500-Featured Image-Logo-2020

Cord-cutting is not a new phenomenon for Charter, which has to contend not only with its traditional competitors but also with new, online-only entrants. Still, despite further declines in its video and voice subscriptions, the Connecticut-based telecom giant managed to add more than 1.4 million new Internet customers in its last fiscal year. It also successfully squeezed slightly more monthly revenue from residential customers, an average of $112.60 per month in 2019, up from $111.60 the year before. This growth helped the company boost its revenue to $45.8 billion, which was up nearly 5% year-over-year.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 66th running of the list.

F500-2020-071-Charter-Communications

Cord-cutting is not a new phenomenon for Charter, which has to contend not only with its traditional competitors, but also with new, online-only entrants. Still, despite more declines in its video and voice subscriptions, the Connecticut-based telecom giant managed to add more than 1.4 million new Internet customers in its last fiscal year. It also successfully squeezed slightly more monthly revenue from residential customers, an average of $112.60 per month in 2019, up from $111.60 the year before. This growth helped the company boost its revenue to $45.8 billion, which was up nearly 5% year-over-year.

This year's Fortune Global 500 generated $27.7 trillion in revenues and $1.5 trillion in profits.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 65th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 64th running of the list.

Welcome to the inaugural Fortune Future 50, our new ranking of companies best positioned for breakout growth.

The Future 50

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 63rd running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 62nd running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 61st running of the list. Wal-Mart claims the top spot again. See who made the list.

Wal-Mart stayed on top as its sales crept closer to half-a-trillion dollars. Apple moved into the top five. And UnitedHealth Group continued its steady climb. 

Future 50

Overall Score

Sector

Industry

Website

Employees

HQ Location

Revenues ($M) (Past 12 Months)

Profits ($M) (Past 12 Months)

Market Value as of Oct. 9, 2019 ($M)

Strongest Dimension

Years on list

Previous rank

State

Key Financials (last Fiscal Year)

Revenues ($M)

Profits ($M)

Assets ($M)

Total Stockholder Equity ($M)

Profit Ratios

Profit as % of Revenues

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholder Equity

Earnings Per Share (last Fiscal Year)

Earnings Per Share ($)

EPS % Change (from prior fiscal year)

EPS % Change (5 year annual rate)

EPS % Change (10 year annual rate)

Total Return

Total Return to Investors (last year)

Total Return to Investors (5 year, annualized)

Total Return to Investors (10 year, annualized)

Charter Communications, founded in 1993, offers cable and broadband services via its Spectrum brand to more than 31 million U.S. customers across 41 states. Spectrum Mobile, the company’s offering for phone-based services, launched its 5G network in 2020. In May 2025, Charter announced a deal to buy cable and broadband provider Cox Communications for $34.5 billion.

Q2 2026

Q1 2026

Q4 2025

Q3 2025

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Q4 2024

Charter Communications (CHTR): Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings

legacy

Charter Communications

charter communications

Hello, and welcome to Charter Communications' Third Quarter 2025 Investor Conference Call. We ask that you please hold all questions until the completion of the formal remarks, at which time you will be given instructions for the question-and-answer session. Also, as a reminder, this conference is being recorded today. If you have any objections, please disconnect at this time.

I will now turn the call over to Stefan Anninger.

Thanks, Leila, and welcome, everyone. The presentation that accompanies this call can be found on our website, ir.charter.com. I would like to remind you that there are a number of risk factors and other cautionary statements contained in our SEC filings, and we encourage you to read them carefully. Various remarks that we make on this call concerning expectations, predictions, plans, and prospects constitute forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ from historical or anticipated results. Any forward-looking statements reflect management's current view only, and Charter undertakes no obligation to revise or update such statements. As a reminder, all growth rates noted on this call and in the presentation are calculated on a year-over-year basis unless otherwise specified. On today's call, we have Chris Winfrey, our President and CEO, and Jessica Fischer, our CFO.

With that, let's turn the call over to Chris.

Thanks, Stefan. During the third quarter, we remained the fastest-growing mobile provider in the United States. We added nearly 500,000 Spectrum Mobile lines in the quarter and 2 million lines over the last 12 months, over 20% growth. Our video customer losses continued to improve to 70,000, less than a quarter of last year's third-quarter losses. That was driven by significant product improvements over the past two years. Internet competition for new customers remains high, and our third-quarter internet customer losses were in line with last year. Revenue was down about 1% year-over-year, driven by customer losses and a challenging political advertising comparison. Third-quarter EBITDA declined by 1.5% year-over-year, essentially flat when excluding advertising. The operating environment for new sales, in particular internet, continues to reflect low move rates and higher mobile substitution, along with both expanded cell phone internet competition and fiber overlap growth, similar to earlier in the year.

Collectively, that drove third-quarter internet gross adds lower year-over-year. Churn improved year-over-year, as to be expected given last year's ACP-related impacts, and internet churn, including non-pay churn, remains at historically low levels. From a medium and long-term growth perspective, we know we have the best network, fully capable of where we operate with increasing demand for bandwidth, and we have great products to help us win and the ability to save customers hundreds or even thousands of dollars a year. In the short term, with lower selling opportunities and new forms of competition, small changes in sales or churn have an outsized impact on internet net gains. We're leaving no stone unturned to drive customer and financial growth, including improved customer perception of our brand and products, growing mobile profitability, and driving streaming video growth, all with the focus to drive connectivity revenue growth.

We're also improving our long-term cost profile through our service and technology investments, including AI. Beginning with go-to-market, we remain focused on better ways to message our products and value savings, including our marketing and channel mix and testing new offers within our national pricing and packaging structure. The new pricing and packaging we launched in September of last year produces a higher number of total products sold per connect, a gig attach rate that has nearly doubled, more mobile lines per customer connect, and a video sell-in rate that has improved substantially with lower customer churn from bundling.

Despite lower selling opportunities given the macro backdrop, our yield on sales opportunities has steadily increased, and various new offer expressions in our marketing mix are designed to find audience and drive more traffic to digital and traditional sales channels, saving customers money without sacrificing our revenue or cash flow potential at the household level. Our marketing efforts, combined with our improving products, promotional and retail pricing, and customer service, have resulted in significant improvement in consumer perception scores over the past year. Our service is backed by the investment in our 100% U.S.-based sales and service workforce, increasing tenure of those employees and quality from better pay, benefits, and technology investment, coupled with our market-leading and industry-first customer commitment across our wireline and wireless services, which we back with service credits, including for outages.

If we can't be at your home or business the same day for service or at least next day for installation. For service visits, we're moving our internal standard to arrive at your doorstep within two hours of the service call, and we're now achieving that a large percentage of the time, all of which is helping to drive improved brand perception. In mobile, our broadband growth continues, and for the last six quarters, the majority of our line net adds have come from Unlimited Plus lines, which offer higher customer value and drive lower churn. We've also been selling more mobile lines per connect and additional lines to existing mobile households. Convergence reduces internet churn, and higher mobile lines per customer benefits churn further. Increasingly, the line between mobile and wireline connectivity is being blurred as our customers connect seamlessly between the two networks.

Over the last 12 months, our total connectivity revenue grew by about 4%. 21% of our internet customers are now converged, meaning they buy both our mobile and internet products. The profitability of our converged customers continues to grow. We don't treat mobile as a separate product, but if we did, slide 7 shows our fully loaded mobile service margin excluding acquisition, and that's without the significant churn benefit to internet. Mobile's financial contribution continues to grow with our scale and a 20% reduction in our reliance on macro cell towers over the past three years. We are growing offload to faster networks driven by the development of our Spectrum Mobile network with seamless authentication to nearly 50 million small cell towers through our Advanced WiFi, CBRS deployment, and partner cable networks.

With 88% of Spectrum Mobile device traffic now on our own network, the cable operators deliver more facilities-based traffic than the traditional mobile carriers. WiFi is essentially the backbone for all cellular traffic, and 5G macro cell towers are really our backup radios with lower speed and higher latency. We continue to evolve our fiber-powered wireline network to deliver internet service that offers more throughput, even less latency, and greater reliability, all at a great value. Our network evolution initiative remains on track to deliver symmetrical and multi-gig speeds across our entire footprint with convergence everywhere we operate. In early 2026, we'll launch our Advanced WiFi Complete product, a Tri-Band Advanced WiFi 7 router that integrates 5G cellular and battery backup to keep customers seamlessly and fully connected during a service disruption or a power outage.

We've also announced new B2B partnerships that allow secure auto connection to the Spectrum Mobile network, starting with Amazon and Nexar, and we're exploring a wide range of B2B applications using the network assets highlighted on slide 4, including lower-cost and higher-performance data transport, authentication services, and other consumer-friendly uses of our capabilities. Our video product also continues to evolve and improve. Earlier this month, we announced the launch of our Spectrum App Store, a digital marketplace where Spectrum customers can discover, activate, manage, and upgrade the apps included with their Spectrum TV video plans, and non-video customers can purchase DTC video apps à la carte. The store is accessible on my Spectrum app and on our website, spectrum.net. It's an important additional step in our effort to bring back utility and value to customers in the video ecosystem, really for the benefit of our connectivity services.

With the combination of over $125 of included video app value in our video product, unified search and discovery in Xumo, and our digital marketplace, we're now more fully marketing our seamless entertainment packaging. Slide 9 shows our video customers are increasingly streaming customers through the award-winning Spectrum TV app and now included programmer streaming apps. Also, earlier this month, we announced that we're partnering with Apple to record and distribute a selection of immersive live Laker games starting in January. That'll go to Spectrum Internet and video customers in LA, Nevada, and Hawaii using the Spectrum SportsNet Immersive app on the Apple Vision Pro. The same will be distributed nationally the next day throughout our footprint and on the NBA Immersive app. The experience is amazing, and you can see how immersive content will apply across next-generation devices in the future.

Keep in mind that these immersive video streams filmed in 16K require consistent throughput of 150 Mb per second to the home, even when distributed in 8K for the Apple Vision Pro. Our fiber-powered, bandwidth-rich network is ideally suited to deliver these kinds of immersive experiences, which require significant throughput and benefit from lower latency. We continue to believe a high-quality video product with value and utility to customers, and the development of these bandwidth-rich products can be yet another competitive advantage for our seamless connectivity products. Video also remains a significant driver of lower customer churn, and it can help drive acquisition. The partnerships we're recreating with programmers and the leagues create benefits for all of us as we, for example, address the problem of where's my game.

Most of what I've discussed this morning really relates to our products and how they'll help drive customer demand and revenue growth. We're also deploying new technologies, which will transform the quality and economics of our $8 billion annual cost to serve. For years, we've meaningfully improved the quality of our service while reducing service calls and truck rolls, often at a double-digit rate annually. We've reinvested those savings into frontline employee wages and benefits, as well as technology and tools to enhance the quality of our service interactions with customers, both of which have meaningfully improved service employee tenure and career progression.

Just a few of the currently deployed tools that we have include machine learning and AI for our network and in-home telemetry to identify and address service issues before they ever occur, even more so with the deployment of signal and power transponders, which will occur as part of our network evolution initiative. Another example is our unified front end for agents with real-time call transcription, feeding our AI models for what we call next best action presentment to the agent based on hundreds of real-time and historical metrics. That front end also integrates our Spectrum GPT capabilities for the agent, which will move from current text to conversational prompting. Our AI-based customer sentiment measurement includes supervisor tools to flag real-time agent support and subsequent agent-specific training modules.

Our service calls also now have AI call summarization presented on call transfers or subsequent calls and for field techs on job arrival. We're also integrating network telemetry, and AI will prompt next best action and coaching for the field maintenance techs as well. You can imagine the upcoming positive effects of AI in areas like network monitoring, dispatch, and workforce planning. These are just a few isolated examples, often seamless to our employees as it simply improves their job and it improves the service experience. At Charter, these tools are all supported by the same unified data set and tools development within our centralized operating model. All of that reflects where we are today and in the coming months.

Just over the past few months, we've seen rapid investments in agentic AI technology such that we're focusing our efforts with a few key partners going into 2026 to integrate our existing capabilities into a more agentic service. The recent advancements most relevant to us include short and long-term memory, handling multiple customer issues and prioritization, multimodal and multi-channel service, including our internal service channels, and over time, the customer's chosen interface. The goal is first to have a better customer experience at every implementation and then to significantly lower operating cost with even higher tenured service employees because the quality of the job is enhanced. All a virtuous cycle to lower service transactions and cost and improve customer satisfaction, churn, and customer growth.

The prospect for agentic AI tools for our back-office employees and software developers has also rapidly increased, and those will be separate work streams within the company. The benefits are still probably 12 to 18 months away, but we believe the impact can be real and material, and we'll plan on updating progress on future calls. The current operating environment is driving us every day to perform better, and we are, whether it's continued improvement in our network and product capabilities, adapting our marketing strategy to find audience and drive traffic in a temporarily challenging macro and competitive environment, or improving execution of our customer service commitments through all the efforts I mentioned, we're becoming a better operator every day. The consumers are noticing, as evidenced by our improving brand perception.

All of that effort is in support of our core strategy of offering the best products, including seamless connectivity and seamless entertainment, the most value with unmatched service. Ultimately, those efforts and our differentiated network will drive perpetuity-free cash flow growth, which remains our focus for shareholder value creation.

Thanks, Chris. Let's please turn to our customer results on slide 11. Including residential and small business, we lost 109,000 internet customers in the third quarter, in line with last year's results, but lower when adjusted to remove last year's impact from ACP-related disconnects. In mobile, we added 493,000 lines with higher gross additions year over year, offset by disconnects on a larger base.

Video customers declined by 70,000 versus a loss of 294,000 in the third quarter of 2024, with the improvement primarily driven by better connects year over year, resulting from the new pricing and packaging we launched last fall and the various product improvements that Chris covered, and lower churn year over year, driven in part by our programmer app inclusion packaging. Wireline voice customers declined by 200,000. In rural, we continue to see accelerating customer relationship growth. We generated 52,000 net customer additions in our subsidized rural footprint in the quarter. In the third quarter, we grew our subsidized rural passings by 124,000 and by over 453,000 over the last 12 months. We continue to expect subsidized rural passings growth of approximately 450,000 in 2025, in addition to continued non-rural construction and fill-in activity.

The B bidding process is largely complete. We bid in 20 different states and were awarded subsidies associated with approximately 84,000 passings. In total, we expect to spend approximately $230 million of our own capital net of subsidies to build out those passings over the next several years. Moving to third quarter revenue results on slide 12. Over the last year, residential customers declined by 2.1%. While residential revenue per customer relationship grew by 1% year-over-year, given promotional rate step-ups, rate adjustments, and the growth of Spectrum Mobile lines, those factors were partly offset by a higher mix of non-video customers, growth of low-priced video packages within our base, and $106 million of costs allocated to programmer streaming apps and netted within video revenue versus $25 million in the prior year period. That allocation should grow over time as more customers authenticate into our streaming application offers, but it's neutral to EBITDA.

As slide 12 shows, in total, residential revenue declined by 1.1% and by 0.4% when excluding costs allocated to streaming apps and netted within video revenue in both periods. Turning to commercial revenue, total commercial grew by 0.9% year over year, with mid-market and large business revenue growth of 3.6%. When excluding all wholesale revenue, mid-market and large business revenue grew by 4%. Small business revenue declined by 0.9%, reflecting a decline in small business customers, with revenue per customer remaining essentially flat year over year. Third quarter advertising revenue declined by 21%, including the impact of less political. Excluding political, advertising revenue decreased by 0.5%, with national and local advertising market challenges partly offset by our higher advanced advertising and better inventory selling capabilities. Other revenue grew by 10.7%, primarily driven by higher mobile device sales.

In total, consolidated third quarter revenue was down 0.9% year over year and grew 0.4% when excluding advertising revenue and costs allocated to streaming apps and netted within video revenue in both periods. Moving to operating expenses and adjusted EBITDA on slide 13. In the third quarter, total operating expenses decreased by 0.5% year over year. Programming costs declined by 6.5% due to a 3.5% decline in video customers year over year, a higher mix of lighter video packages, and $106 million of costs allocated to programmer streaming apps and netted within video revenue, partly offset by higher programming rates. Other costs of revenue increased by 4.6%, primarily driven by higher mobile service direct costs and mobile device sales, partly offset by lower franchise and regulatory fees and lower advertising sales costs given lower political activity.

Cost to service customers, which combines field and technology operations and customer operations, decreased 0.7% year over year, primarily due to lower bad debt expense and labor costs, partly offset by higher network utility costs. Excluding bad debt, cost to service customers was essentially flat year over year. Marketing and residential sales expense grew by 5.4% due to some higher marketing spend with dramatically higher impressions at lower cost and continued channel mix shift from lower-cost channels like in-house call centers to digital and affiliates. Finally, other expense increased by 0.7%. Adjusted EBITDA declined by 1.5% year over year in the quarter and was essentially flat when excluding advertising. We expect 2025 full-year EBITDA growth to be flat or marginally positive year over year, with higher underlying growth absent the impact of political advertising.

EBITDA growth in the fourth quarter will be pressured by at least as much as it was in the third quarter, given last year's political advertising strength and the same macro pressures we saw in the third quarter. Turning to net income, we generated $1.1 billion of net income attributable to Charter shareholders in the third quarter compared to $1.3 billion last year, given this quarter's lower adjusted EBITDA and higher other operating expenses driven by merger and acquisition costs related to the pending Cox Transaction and severance costs. Turning to slide 14, capital expenditures totaled a bit less than $3.1 billion in the third quarter, nearly $500 million higher than last year's third quarter due to CPE spend timing and higher network evolution spend.

We continue to expect total 2025 capital expenditures to reach approximately $11.5 billion, lower than our original outlook of $12 billion, primarily as the result of some network evolution capital pushed into 2026. Despite that push, our goal is to ensure that 2025 is the peak capital year, even if by a small margin. Aside from the network evolution timing variance, our previous commentary on capital outlook on a standalone basis remains the same. Further, even including the impact of the Cox Transaction and associated integration capital, we expect total combined company capital expenditures to decline in the first full calendar year post-close. All of those statements are inclusive of the B2B spending I mentioned earlier.

Turning to free cash flow on slide 15, third quarter free cash flow totaled $1.6 billion, in line with prior year, given higher CapEx, offset by lower cash taxes, and a more favorable change in cable working capital tied to CPE spend, some of which will reverse in 4Q. We expect full-year change in cable working capital to be modestly positive. Turning to quarterly and full-year 2025 cash taxes, third quarter cash taxes totaled $53 million. We expect full-year cash tax payments to total approximately $1 billion. We finished the third quarter with $95 billion in debt principal. Our weighted average cost of debt remains at an attractive 5.2%. Our current run rate annualized cash interest is $4.9 billion. During the quarter, we repurchased 7.6 million Charter shares and Charter Holdings common units, totaling $2.2 billion at an average price of $292 per share.

As of the end of the third quarter, our ratio of net debt to last 12-month adjusted EBITDA increased sequentially to 4.15x and stood at 4.23x pro forma for the pending Liberty Broadband transaction. As I've noted before, during the pendency of the Cox deal, we plan to be at or slightly under 4.25x leverage pro forma for the Liberty transaction. Post-close, however, we will move our long-term target leverage to 3.5x to 4x . We would expect to deleverage to the middle of that range within two to three years following close. Before moving to Q&A, I wanted to remind everyone that as our capital spending peaks this year and as we begin to benefit from President Trump's new tax legislation, we are poised for rapid free cash flow and free cash flow per share growth over the next several years.

Slide 16 lays that phenomenon out very clearly. With the additional upside potential from future EBITDA growth, a declining standalone share count, and the powerful economic and strategic benefits of our Cox Transaction, the pro forma entity will generate higher free cash flow per share in spite of deleveraging, which will reduce our cost of capital. As Chris mentioned, sustainable free cash flow is our key focus metric for delivering shareholder value. With that, I'll turn it over to the operator for Q&A.

Thank you. At this time, if you would like to ask a question, please click on the raise hand button, which can be found on the black bar at the bottom of your screen. When it is your turn, you will receive a message on your screen from the host allowing you to talk, and then you will hear your name called. Please accept, unmute your audio, and ask your question. As a reminder, we are allowing analysts to ask one question today. We will wait one moment to allow the queue to form. Our first question will come from Craig Moffett with Moffettnathanson. Please unmute and ask your question. Craig, your line is now open. You're able to unmute on your side when you're ready.

Good morning. Chris, I wonder if you could just help us think about where broadband is getting better so that we can get our minds around your arguments that things are going to improve on the broadband side. Is it in areas where you've completed your high splits? Can you share some data that suggests that your market share or market retention is improving? You talked about voluntary versus involuntary churn last quarter and your voluntary churn metrics being best ever. I wonder if you could help us frame why we should be optimistic about improving results.

Sure. To tackle both of those quickly, I think it's probably best to give a more global look. The high split is going well, but we're not actively marketing the capabilities until we get further down the road from a national perspective, just to make sure that we're on track there. There's really nothing to report there. Where churn is definitely better is to the extent that we have a mobile relationship and to the extent we have more lines per mobile relationship, the impact is significant on the churn impact. In addition to that, which has always been the case in cable, to the extent you have a video relationship attached to that.

Now, what we're seeing is the additional activation of these direct-to-consumer apps, which are included as part of the offer. To the extent when that occurs and it's meaningful, the churn benefit is pretty significant. No big secret that bundling different products together, saving customers money, having them have a -- Unified service with seamless connectivity and seamless entertainment really does that from a churn perspective. The challenge that we're facing right now isn't so much on the churn side, although I think there's real opportunity where that will just continue to get better. The challenge we have is the operating environment. It remains competitive with new competitors and a macro environment that hasn't gotten better. I'll start from the top of the funnel. We have a really muted housing environment. There's slow household formation and low move rates. We have continued mobile substitution growth. You layer on top of that, so you have these kind of macro trends you layer on top of that.

Competitively, there's more footprint expansion from cell phone internet, particularly from AT&T. There's no secret. Some others have varying results on the residential fixed wireless access or cell phone internet, but AT&T is new to the space with expanding coverage. You take a look at our overlap with 1 Gb or higher competition. It's grown. The pace of that growth hasn't changed in our fiber overlap areas. Our penetration in mature fiber overlap areas remains well above the competition. It's new competition in multiple fronts. In any market, when you have new competition, whether it's fiber or cell phone internet, there's going to be a short-term impact on us. That's where we're seeing it right now, is at the gross ad level. We are seeing in Q1 and Q2, our gross adds were actually higher year over year.

Q3, it was lower year over year. The impact there was most pronounced in the low-income segment. That's not an excuse. I'm not sure if somebody's targeting it or not, but it was pretty notable for us. That's still very much an important segment for us as well, and we're trying to pay attention to that. It's really coming down to, at this stage, competition for a limited number of gross adds that exist in the marketplace because of the macro trends. Having said all that, if you think about, Craig, you and I have spoken about it before, if you look at a bucket of gross adds and a bucket of disconnects, the difference between net loss and net adds is a sliver of gross adds or it's a sliver of disconnects.

In this case, I think over time, when you think about the forward outlook, whether it's household formation, whether it's. Mobile substitution steadying out, whether it's low move rates, whether it's cell phone internet getting to its final state of footprint, which is coming, or the slowdown or cessation of new fiber overbuild, all those things I think will happen. It's just unclear. It's very difficult to predict, frankly, the timing of each one of those. I don't think it takes all of them. It takes a couple of those, one or a couple of those, and you'd have an outsized impact on our ability to grow. In the meantime, we're not standing still. You can hear it. There's a determination on our side in marketing offer expressions, better use of mobile and video.

I think through our own efforts, both short-term and long-term, as well as a couple of those external and macro variables changing, it would make all the difference. We'll grow internet customers again. I think in the meantime, when we take a look, is there a silver lining? The silver lining is that this environment is pushing us to be a better operator. I think when we come out the back end with macro or competitive slowdown, which will occur, we'll end up being a better operator with a better brand perception and probably a better cost structure along the way as well.

Thanks, Craig. Leila, we'll take our next question, please.

Your next question will come from Ben Swinburne with Morgan Stanley.

Great. Great. Two questions. Jessica, I think back in September, you had suggested that the fourth quarter EBITDA decline would be maybe less significant than the third quarter. You can correct me if I got that wrong. It sounds like you're signaling that it'll be bigger in Q4 than Q3. I'm just wondering if you could talk a little bit about what's changed in the business. If the layoffs are having a positive or negative, maybe there's a charge in their impact in the fourth quarter. Chris, I hesitate to ask you about your competition since it's not you, it's them. This has been an interesting week. Comcast announced that they're not planning a rate increase, normal course on broadband. Verizon talked about the fact that they had leaned too much on price increases.

I know Charter's always been, going back to Tom's leadership, more cautious, I guess, for lack of a better term, on pricing. I'm just wondering if when you hear that, do you think it does it change your outlook? Do you have to think differently about your ability to grow broadband revenues, convergence revenues, just given what you're hearing from two of the companies, one of which is a major competitor in the marketplace? Thank you.

Got it. Ben, on the EBITDA side, as we often do, we explored some new offers inside of the third quarter, and a few of those offers impacted ARPU a bit more than we had anticipated without driving the additional sales that we expected. We're pulling them from the market as of the beginning of November, but they're putting a bit of pressure on our ARPU growth in 4Q, which, combined with some sales channel mixed pressure in marketing and resi sales, will put us in that place where you did hear it correctly, that I think they were a little more pressured in Q4 than we had anticipated that we would be when I spoke about it a few months ago.

Ben, on rate increase, I'd take a step back. Clearly, we've seen, to your point, everything that's been said in the past week or so. ARPU today, in our promotional pricing and retail pricing, when you take a look at the Spectrum pricing and packaging that we rolled out last year, our ARPU and our pricing is low today versus our peers and competitor.

Because of that, we've always had, as you pointed out, probably a little more headroom than others. Given this macro environment, we're not in a position to not pass through cost increases as they occur. That's particularly the case with video. I wish that were different, but that's the economic reality. I think you should expect us to do that, and because of discipline in the past, we're probably in a different spot. I would also say remember that based on the Spectrum pricing packaging that we rolled out last year and other migrations that we've done before, because of the transaction activity over the past year, we've successfully migrated much of our base to Spectrum pricing and packaging.

You haven't seen in our results, other than this separate offer that Jessica mentioned, you haven't seen a big ARPU impact of that migration to lower promotional and lower retail pricing over the past year because we've managed it through putting more value into the package. That's the case, and so that migration at a product level and ARPU has been invisible externally. That migration has occurred not just through acquisition, but as customers see these offers in the marketplace, there's a proactive. Migration that they initiate also occurs through retention and through loyalty offers that we've migrated a big portion of our existing base over, as well as reactive migrations I mentioned inside of retention. We've been able to manage ARPU in a way that continues to create value for customers, lowering their overall product price but keeping the household contribution the same, particularly at a margin level.

To wrap it up, I think we're in a slightly different situation. I don't think that's where we're at today because of what we've done over the past couple of years.

Thanks, Ben. Leila, we'll take our next question, please.

Your next question will come from Vikash Harlalka with New Street Research.

Hi. Thanks so much for taking the question. Chris, it seems like there's a theme at play here where you split the script on how you've marketed your products historically. At your video event earlier this month, you talked about potentially marketing video to customers where they pay for streaming services and get a linear video for free. Similarly, there was a promotion recently where customers receive broadband for nearly free when they buy four lines of mobile. Is this the next sort of step in the evolution in the marketing chain?

Yeah. I think these are just different marketing offer expressions to get to higher ARPU and higher margin per household at the same time, saving customers lots of money, trying to create win-win scenarios. Our national pricing and packaging hasn't changed, and I think that's the vast majority of how we go to market. The video expression really is just the way we talk about it. If you think about it for, I'm going to make this up, but an audience over 35 years old, for an audience over 35 years old, it may resonate that here's your video package. It's around $100, and you get over $125 of apps included for free.

For an audience that's younger that may not be that interested at all in linear video, the expression, "How about I give you $125 plus of app value for $100? And oh, by the way, your linear video is included." That's the exact same product. There's no change in economics there for us, but depending on the audience, either way, we're saving them lots of money, and it's valuable to them. It's just expressed in a different way. You overlay Xumo and the ability to have unified search and discovery. It is an interesting and compelling way to use video to drive our connectivity services. The four-line offer, one, I would start by saying that's a relatively small audience that's willing to convert over four lines in one single fell swoop.

It is a good way to express value to consumers by saying, "If you take four lines, we'll give you internet for free." When you do the math and think about the economics here, I'm sure Jessica can chime in, but the vast majority of these customers take speed upgrades. They're taking Unlimited Plus. Our ARPU at selling and over time and our margin over time is higher than any other traditional sale. You can move dollars around. That's the benefit of having multiple products to sell and creating offer expressions that create a really winning situation for different pockets of audience in the marketplace. You don't have to sacrifice revenue or margin from a company perspective in order to achieve that. Again, that's a twist and offer expression for a relatively small audience. You're not going to see a lot of volume there, but to the extent it exists, it's incremental to what you would have gotten otherwise. It's a great if relative to the average acquisition,

Particularly too, because those customers with four lines of mobile and an internet line, their churn rates are very low. You can end up with very high customer lifetime values, particularly given the combination of the four lines and the upgraded services that people take.

You're totally right. Even without that, it's a slam dunk. That makes it what Jessica said is true. If we get four lines and a free internet with an upgraded for an extra $10 or $20 to 500 Mg or to a gig plus Unlimited Plus lines, the value in that package, it's high for both. It's higher than the customer can get anywhere else in the marketplace. It's higher for us than a high-value house. Because of that, the relationship sticks, has low churn, has high customer lifetime value for both.

Thanks, Vikash. Leila, we'll take our next question, please.

Your next question will come from Jessica Wright-Ehrlich with Bank of America.

Thank you. I guess two different things. One, can you just give us an update on color on Cox acquisition, how you're preparing for it, and just the timing as well. On the video product, you've had such dramatic improvement pretty quickly since you started marketing it in October. Can you give any detail or color on that in terms of conversion of broadband-only subs, what you're seeing in terms of retention, how many subs are really engaging with this? I mean, obviously, it's working.

Yes. On Cox, there's no real new news there. From a timeline perspective, everything we've said in the past remains the same. I don't want to step on my own feet here and say it differently, but I think it was mid-next year is what we had said, and that's still the case.

Our focus right now from a Cox perspective is a few-fold, but first and foremost is to work with the regulators at the federal and state level, make sure that we're in a position to answer all their questions properly, make sure they understand the value that exists here for customers in particular, because we have lower pricing and the ability to bring these types of mobile offers and video at scale and to save money across really the entire suite of products, as well as for employees and the communities we serve, including adopting some of the great things that Cox does inside of their local communities and create a benefit for not just the Cox footprint, but also inside our existing footprint as well.

That's the biggest focus, but also clearly, as we try to make sure we're preparing ourselves as quickly as possible post-closing to put ourselves in a position to launch the Spectrum brand in Cox markets, to launch our pricing and packaging, to put Xumo in place for video acquisition, and to apply our seamless entertainment and seamless connectivity products. There's a lot of work in preparation for us to do that. We can't do anything in the meantime until we close. We can do a lot of thinking. We do a lot of preparation and trying to get ready for that, and the team's busy on that front as well.

On video, it's going to sound like apple pie, but our sales are up. Churn is down on video relative to prior periods, and the activation of the apps has really accelerated. It had been growing pretty steadily, but that was absent us really doing anything to advertise or drive it because we wanted to make sure that the service experience for activation was there in a unified way, that upgrades could work the way that it should with the incremental cost to the customer, and it had gotten pretty significant. Clearly, we had the launch of the new ESPN app, FOX One, as well as Hulu now included for free. In the past few weeks, the launch of the Spectrum app and digital marketplace led to an accelerated pickup, even in the recent weeks.

The benefit from that is what we can clearly see now. When you segment customers based on their tenure with the company, the number of activations of these direct-to-consumer apps that they have, whether that customer is 0 to 6 months, 10 years, 6 to 12, 12 to 24, 24 and beyond, in each of that A/B testing of whether they activated the apps or not and how many apps did they activate, the churn reduction is significant. There is clearly a lot of self-fulfilling prophecy that's inside there. Those that activate tend to like us more, I would argue. It's pretty compelling, and we're excited about what we're seeing on that front. It's been a lot of work. It's not perfect yet. When you think about the different ways that customers activate, each one of those programmers genuinely has a different activation path and flow that we need to follow.

We still think we can work on that with things like behind the modem, automatic authentication, and still get password and credentials to the programmers the way that they want. There are still things that we can do to make it even better. We're not done, but pretty pleased with where it's at. I said it in the prepared remarks. I just want to be clear. Our goal here isn't to have positive video ads, and unfortunately, it's not to save the video ecosystem because it's pretty challenged. Our goal is to make sure that we have a unique and differentiated product that we can put in front of our connectivity customers in a way that generates new ways to market and acquire customers and has retention value, and it has value and utility for them.

To the extent a broadband customer wants that and values that, we're going to attach that to the relationship. If they don't, we won't. We'll just rely on the retention value of internet and mobile convergence on that front. It's going well, but it's still very early days. The amount of pickup on these inclusion offers is significant, and it's great for the programmers because once that happens, they will have, relative to standalone selling of these retail products, much lower churn. There is obviously no operating cost in the wholesale relationship. It's great economics that exist inside the traditional linear system. They have the upgrade potential of these apps to an ad-free version. We'll keep innovating in different ways wherever the customer wants to go.

That's where we're going to try to meet them together with what I think is a very different relationship that we have now with the programmers and even the leagues, understanding the importance of doing from packaging and from utility inside Xumo with the ability to have unified search and discovery across all these apps and really solve what I call, "Where's the game?" problem.

The one thing that I would add to that, while it's not sort of the focus of investing in the video product, there has been significant financial pressure on video margin with the loss of customers that we've seen over the last several years and bringing stability to that space. Even if it's not that you fully stop it from shrinking, if we can bring the pace of that down, that really allows us to be in a better place to highlight the growth that we see across other areas of the business and to drive financial growth of the company as a whole by having more stability in video.

Yeah. It's actually an important derivative growth.

Thanks, Jessica. Leila, we'll take our next question, please.

Your next question will come from Michael Rollins with Citi.

Hi, thanks, and good morning. Two topics, if I could. First, through all the recent efforts to improve efficiency at a lower cost, can you size the future opportunity for savings, including if you have any step function opportunities to take cost out, whether it's migrating customers to IP video off the linear infrastructure or the automation tools that you're bringing to your customers and employees? Secondly, and I guess forgive the expression, are there any non-linear ways to expand Charter's addressable market for revenue to introduce new ways to monetize the customer relationship for both the consumer and business segments? Thanks.

Yeah. Great questions, actually, and both of which we're thinking a lot about. The size of the cost opportunity, I've mentioned it in the remarks today. We've been getting, -- depending on the year, but if you look at a multi-year period of reduction in cost to serve for customer relationship through quality transactions, which actually came about by investing more. We invested more in our employees and our systems and tools in order to drive down service transactions and have lower churn. All of that ultimately reduced our cost to serve over time per customer despite the higher investments. More recently, in the past, I'd say two years, making those tools better, the investments that we've had there have been driven by machine learning, which has migrated into AI-type investments. The backbone of all of that is a unified data and software development structure that we have here at Charter, which may or may not be unique.

It allows us to put these separate AI tools because they're really functioning off the same data spine and development infrastructure. It actually sets us up very well for agentic AI. I'll be honest, just a few months ago, I kind of rolled my eyes. When you take a look at the things that I mentioned that have really changed, at least from our perspective, what we've been able to see, whether it's short and long-term memory, multimodal, the ability for our agent to potentially, meaning an agentic AI agent able to interact with the customer's agent over time, there's a real opportunity here for doing, first and foremost, the improvement of quality of customer service. Based on the knowledge of the significant number of transactions we do every year, there's not millions of different ways to do that transaction, best ways. There's usually one.

The opportunity to meet the customer where they want to be in a digital transaction is big. I mentioned inside the prepared remarks just the size of the cost of service for us is $8 billion. A lot of that's physical, but a lot of it's different areas of the business. What that will do if we make those investments, it actually first is can you improve the customer service quality? Second is, can you improve the quality of the job for an agent? When you do those things, you make it better for the customer, but the agent's more satisfied too, which means that you have a happier employee who develops more tenure with the company, which is actually better for the customer. You get this virtuous cycle agenda. The back end, you can dramatically lower your cost in environments that have naturally higher attrition to begin with.

I think the size of that, the total of it today, you can see it in our P&Ls, $8 billion. I think there's, without giving, we don't know yet the exact size, but I think it could be significant, and we're leaning into that pretty heavily. The non-linear ways we've been of growing revenue, developing new products. For the past few quarters, we've included a slide. I don't know if it's slide four. We can take a look, but whether that's right or not, there's a slide in there that shows the extent of our assets. Part of that slide is meant to demonstrate that we have facilities, and we have connectivity capabilities that I think are genuinely of interest to a much broader array of B2B partners and could also create additional, even residential products for us over time.

I mentioned we have recently signed up with Amazon to do data offloading, saves them money, has better connectivity. We've done the same thing with Nexar, which you'll find in different car ride-share services as video cameras for offload. You could think about what could we bring to the EV community in terms of offload and the amount of bandwidth that comes into a garage every single night and save those providers money, which actually ends up saving customers money. You could think about our location-based services behind the modem or with our seamless connectivity abroad in terms of financial transactions and managing cybersecurity risk in a low-latency environment in ways that you could monetize that. That facilitates transactions for a B2B provider, but also makes the network safer for financial fraud for our end-user customers in a way that could be relatively unique.

You'll see on that page, there's 1,000 hubs and localized data centers. These are not hyperscaler data centers. They're generally much smaller. They have a little bit less, a lot less power. We're exploring different use cases for what you could do there with respect to edge CDN. Could AI inferencing be there? I think there's a huge set of assets that exist in our footprint that are untapped as it relates to new B2B and B2C products. There's nothing here that I can sit here and tell you is material today. We're pretty active in talking to different people across the country and, in fact, globally about different ways that we can make better use of these assets to revive consumers and to bring new revenue streams to us. In some sense, that's the history of cable. If you step back, broadband was never a product.

Voice over IP telephony was never a product. Mobile was never a product. It all came on the backbone of these assets that we have in providing connectivity services. While I still firmly believe we're going to grow internet again for all the reasons that I talked to Craig about earlier, that doesn't mean that this isn't a good opportunity to go take a look and say, "What's the next wave?" It's always happened.

Thanks, Michael. Leila, we'll take our last question, please.

Your last question will come from Peter Supino with Wolfe Research.

Good morning. A financial question. I think you all have done a great job of covering a lot of the operational topics today. Historically, Charter has structured its debt really intelligently so that the maturities are fairly evenly laddered and the rates are fairly fixed. With rates higher today and with growth coming in below where I'm sure all of us expected a few years ago, I wonder what it would take to make it interesting for Charter to start paying down debt maturities over the next few years, understanding that it is your conviction that cable broadband will grow again. I think we're all wondering what we do if it doesn't. Thanks.

Peter, we reevaluate our target leverage ratio all the time in spite of the fact that we don't change it very often. We do that in the context of all of the things you're talking about, whether that's interest rates or growth prospects for the business, sort of how we see the long-term trajectory of the business. Right now, I would say how we see the long-term trajectory of cash flow.

Given what we see across the business today and what we think that we will be able to do as we bring together our business and the Cox business and reap substantial benefits out of that transaction, I think we're comfortable with the standalone business where it is today at just under four and a quarter. When you pro forma in the Liberty debt, over time, when we bring in the Cox assets, assuming that the transaction closes, that on its own sort of moves the leverage ratio down a bit and then targeting at the midpoint of a 3.5x to 4x range over time. What that means is that we will do somewhat less borrowing. I'm sure that you can see we have pretty limited towers over the next couple of years.

On top of that, to be in a place where we would be planning to reduce the leverage ratio, the total amount of borrowing that we do does. Sort of naturally self-limit in that period. I think it strikes a nice balance between being able to continue to return capital to shareholders, which I think is an important part of our business, keeping leverage on the business at a time when there is dramatic free cash flow growth that's coming, in a way that I think will provide significant value to shareholders, and managing risk in a way that's appropriate. We still, in the standalone business and then even more so in the combined business, generate a substantial amount of cash flow so that if we did need to deleverage at some point in the future, from a risk perspective, I think we're more than capable of doing so.

I continue to be happy with where we sit in the guidance that we've given today. It doesn't mean that we won't continue to evaluate. We will. We always have. If it's prudent for us to make a move, we will.

I'm just going to add to that. It's probably a great way to end the call today. The free cash flow that we've talked about, it's mechanical. It's because of the massive step down in capital expenditure. It's mechanical, and it happens whether or not there's some or high EBITDA growth rate. It's happening either way. I think everybody knows we typically, because we want to make sure that we can make the right capital allocation decisions dynamically to create value for shareholders, we typically don't give a lot of financial outlook. To the extent we do, we understand the importance of hitting it.

That includes CapEx. That includes a commitment to EBITDA growth and free cash flow, and particularly free cash flow. That means that you can deliver fast if you needed to or wanted to at any time. Anyway, it's very repetitive to what Jessica just said, but I felt like I wanted to add that in.

Charter Communications (CHTR) Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Company Participants