The coming $80 trillion-plus great wealth transfer could see an unprecedented amount of wealth transferred from flush baby boomers to their Gen X and millennial heirs over the next few decades. The inheritance process will be a life-changing event for many—but it is also one that comes with considerations that families don’t anticipate. That’s why one money manager says it’s a good idea to borrow strategies from the ultra-wealthy, who put considerable time and thought into the inheritance process.
Dawn Jinsky, a certified financial planner with Plante Moran Wealth Management, says there are two main ways to frame an inheritance: As a firehose or a faucet. As the names suggest, a firehouse means the benefactor comes into a ton of money all at once, while the latter is when assets “drip” to heirs periodically over the course of many years.
The ultra-wealthy by far prefer to structure inheritances as a faucet—and there’s a lesson in that for those with more realistic bank accounts, says Jinsky.
“The firehose is, ‘here you go, you’ve never had more than $200 in your savings, now you have $10 million.’ What are you going to do?” says Jinsky. “A faucet approach is, we turn it on a little bit, then we drip. Give $100,000 a year, then when they reach a certain age, we increase it…They will make some mistakes, but at least they’ll do that on the front end, not the back end with the more significant amount.”
In practice, this might mean that assets are placed in a trust that only disburses a certain percentage each year so that the heirs can’t spend it all right away, helping to protect the wealth from the “mistakes” Jinsky mentioned.
The faucet design offers other benefits beyond ensuring heirs don’t squander a windfall at once. One is that, in the event of an heir’s possible divorce or creditors coming after their assets, there will be fewer that can be taken. Another major benefit: Tax planning. Divvying asset distribution over multiple years can help heirs manage their tax bill more effectively.
Have the conversation
For those wanting to set up a faucet arrangement, a trust can be most efficient—but it may not be practical given that may involves expensive legal or banking fees. Fortunately, there are alternatives. For more simple estates—say, a woman dividing her home and retirement account up between two children—named beneficiaries and a will is sufficient, says Jinsky. But for those with more complicated assets (like a business or real estate outside the primary residence), minor children, or considerable wealth, a trust is probably the best option.
Since some may find a trust to be paternalistic, Jinsky advises clients to have open discussions with their children or other heirs during their lifetime to explain why they are putting these measures in place. This talk can include explaining the benefits of the arrangement, or simply why they have structured them the way that they have. Understanding why their parents or other benefactor has made the decisions they’ve made leaves heirs with fewer unanswerable questions, fewer “bitter feelings,” and potentially fewer legal issues, too.
“Most of the time, parents just don’t want to have that conversation, but if they did, it would help tremendously with the aftermath,” says Jinsky. “All the children want to do is ask their parents questions about it. It’s not necessarily, ‘woe is me,’ but it does set children up in planning of their own.”
In fact, getting children or other heirs involved early can be a great educational tool, she says.
“You have to teach your child at an early age as you can to be thoughtful about spending, about borrowing…teach them about philanthropic giving, whatever your family values are,” she says. “That’s your best laid plan for your family, is starting the education process early so that they understand the estate plan.”
