• Home
  • Latest
  • Fortune 500
  • Finance
  • Tech
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
Retailintellectual property

The EU’s Highest Court Has Ruled in Nestle’s 16-Year Battle to Trademark Kit Kat’s 3D Shape

By
David Meyer
David Meyer
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
David Meyer
David Meyer
Down Arrow Button Icon
July 25, 2018, 7:47 AM ET

Nestlé’s Kit Kat has a familiar form, but the company has lost another significant battle in its attempt to trademark that shape across the European Union—because it hasn’t proved that the shape is familiar to everyone as that of a Kit Kat.

Nestlé (NSRGY) got a three-dimensional trademark for its four-fingered, chocolate-and-wafer treat back in 2006—it applied for the trademark in 2002—but rival Cadbury Schweppes, which is now part of Mondelez (MDLZ), got the EU’s General Court to annul the trademark.

The General Court said in 2016 that Nestlé had not proven that the Kit Kat form was seen as distinctive across the entire EU. Specifically, the EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO,) which granted the trademark, had not first ruled that people in Belgium, Ireland, Greece and Portugal recognize the form as that of a Kit Kat.

On Wednesday, the Court of Justice of the European Union (the bloc’s top court) threw out the appeals of Nestlé and the EUIPO, saying the General Court had been right to annul the trademark decision. That means the EUIPO now needs to reassess Nestlé’s trademark application.

“We believe that the distinctive shape of our four finger KitKat deserves protection and, following today’s findings, the case will now be sent back to the EU Board of Appeal to examine the evidence that Nestlé has filed,” Nestlé said in a statement. “We think the evidence proves that the familiar shape of our iconic four finger Kit Kat is distinctive enough to be registered as an EU trademark.”

On the other hand, the Court of Justice also threw out an appeal against the General Court ruling from Mondelez, which wasn’t happy with the idea that Nestlé had proven Kit Kat’s distinctiveness in Denmark, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Austria, Finland, Sweden, and the U.K.

If you’re wondering why Mondelez has such an issue with the Kit Kat trademark, it’s because the company produces a Norwegian chocolate bar called Kvikk Lunsj, which first appeared in 1937. The Kit Kat bar is only barely older, having first been produced in 1935 as “Rowntree’s Chocolate Crisp”—it only adopted the “Kit Kat” name in 1937.

Mondelez has a complicated history when it comes to 3D chocolate trademarks. Last year it failed in a bid to challenge Ritter Sport’s four-by-four square chocolate bar exclusivity in Germany, but it also successfully defended the alpine shape of its Toblerone bar from being emulated by the U.K.’s Poundland chain.

This article was updated to include Nestlé’s statement.

About the Author
By David Meyer
LinkedIn icon
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in Retail

millennial
CommentaryConsumer Spending
Meet the 2025 holiday white whale: the millennial dad spending $500+ per kid
By Phillip GoerickeDecember 12, 2025
1 day ago
McDonald
RetailRetail
Lululemon CEO Calvin McDonald to step down as quarterly profit dips 13%
By Anne D'Innocenzio and The Associated PressDecember 12, 2025
1 day ago
Sarandos
CommentaryAntitrust
Netflix, Warner, Paramount and antitrust: Entertainment megadeal’s outcome must follow the evidence, not politics or fear of integration
By Satya MararDecember 12, 2025
1 day ago
InvestingMarkets
Retail investors drive stocks to a pre-Christmas all-time high—and Wall Street sees a moment to sell
By Jim EdwardsDecember 12, 2025
1 day ago
Five panelists seated; two women and five men.
AIBrainstorm AI
The race to deploy an AI workforce faces one important trust gap: What happens when an agent goes rogue?
By Amanda GerutDecember 11, 2025
2 days ago
Oreo
RetailFood and drink
Zero-sugar Oreos headed to America for first time
By Dee-Ann Durbin and The Associated PressDecember 11, 2025
2 days ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Economy
Tariffs are taxes and they were used to finance the federal government until the 1913 income tax. A top economist breaks it down
By Kent JonesDecember 12, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Success
Apple cofounder Ronald Wayne sold his 10% stake for $800 in 1976—today it’d be worth up to $400 billion
By Preston ForeDecember 12, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Success
40% of Stanford undergrads receive disability accommodations—but it’s become a college-wide phenomenon as Gen Z try to succeed in the current climate
By Preston ForeDecember 12, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
The Fed just ‘Trump-proofed’ itself with a unanimous move to preempt a potential leadership shake-up
By Jason MaDecember 12, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
For the first time since Trump’s tariff rollout, import tax revenue has fallen, threatening his lofty plans to slash the $38 trillion national debt
By Sasha RogelbergDecember 12, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Success
Apple CEO Tim Cook out-earns the average American’s salary in just 7 hours—to put that into context, he could buy a new $439,000 home in just 2 days
By Emma BurleighDecember 12, 2025
1 day ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.