• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
Tech

Customers of This Small Mobile Carrier Could Lose Service Soon

By
Aaron Pressman
Aaron Pressman
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Aaron Pressman
Aaron Pressman
Down Arrow Button Icon
February 6, 2017, 11:44 AM ET
Mobile virtual network operator Ring Plus.
Photo credit: Ring Plus

About 90,000 wireless customers who get service from Ring Plus could lose service later this week as the carrier is battling with its mobile network provider, Sprint.

A virtual wireless carrier that doesn’t own its own network but leases service from Sprint, Ring Plus told customers on Friday that they might be cut off as of February 11. Ring Plus said it was in the process of seeking a court order to delay Sprint’s move by at least 30 days.

The announcement came after Ring Plus filed a lawsuit against Sprint (S) last week charging the carrier with fraud, breach of contract, extortion, and patent infringement.

Sprint denied any wrongdoing, explaining it has more than 100 active agreements with other virtual mobile network operators.

“Sprint has fulfilled every aspect of its agreement with RingPlus and we expect the same from our customer,” the company said in a statement to Fortune. “Sprint will do its best to resolve this.”

“We value our relationships with more than 100 MVNOs, and our top priority is to ensure we are delivering high-quality service and support based on each of our agreements,” the company added.

Ring Plus declined to comment to Fortune.

Get Data Sheet, Fortune’s technology newsletter.

Ring Plus offers extremely inexpensive mobile plans that supplement Sprint coverage with Wi-Fi based coverage. The company’s innovation in the wireless market is that it also generates revenue by playing advertisements instead of the sound of a phone ringing whenever a customer places a call.

In its lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in central California, Ring Plus charges that Sprint has violated two patents it holds concerning providing advertising before a call. And the company said it was tricked by Sprint into entering into a contract to license the technology while Sprint would try to drive it out of business.

“Sprint intended to induce RingPlus’ reliance on its misrepresentations, concealments, and nondisclosures so that Sprint could secure licenses to RingPlus’ patents to avoid paying RingPlus royalties or a lawsuit based on Sprint’s infringing products and services, and to defraud RingPlus to get money,” the company alleged in its lawsuit.

About the Author
By Aaron Pressman
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.