Within hours of the announcement on Thursday—which involves making it easier for users to flag fakes, as well as alerting readers when the accuracy of a story has been called into question—conservative outlets were already dismissing the move as a conspiracy of left-leaning partisans, designed to smother alternative sources and protect existing “gatekeepers.”

Snopes, for example, which has been fact-checking dubious Internet stories for over two decades, was dismissed by some as a “far-left group,” as was fellow verification site Politifact. Others even criticized Facebook as a whole for being a left-leaning entity (which might come as a surprise to board member Peter Thiel, a Trump adviser).

Get Data Sheet, Fortune’s technology newsletter, where this essay originated.

All of this helps explain why Facebook didn’t want to wade into this issue in the first place, not to mention why it resists being defined as a media company so strenuously (although it clearly is one). Facebook likes things that are neat and tidy, like algorithms—not things that are all muddy and gray and complicated, like defining what constitutes fake news.

Unfortunately, that is the world we all live in now, and it is the world in which Facebook has become one of the leading sources of news for large numbers of people.

It may not be pretty, and it may not be something that a bunch of twenty-somethings with math and computer science degrees are equipped to fix. But that doesn’t change the fact that Facebook is in it up to its eyeballs. It is either going to be part of the solution, or it is going to be part of the problem.