• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
Leadership

Why 2016 Is a Nightmare Election for Pollsters

Erika Fry
By
Erika Fry
Erika Fry
Down Arrow Button Icon
Erika Fry
By
Erika Fry
Erika Fry
Down Arrow Button Icon
January 27, 2016, 1:00 PM ET
Illustration by Martin Laksman

Closely watched and highly scrutinized, the polling industry has taken more of a beating than many candidates this campaign season. Yet a little handwringing over accuracy—and occasional fire from Donald Trump—is the least of problems for the American pollster, looking to make (statistically significant) sense of the opinions of an increasingly hard-to-reach American public. The bigger problem? It costs them more than ever to do so.

There are two main drivers of the rising cost of opinion polls: First, Americans, wise to telemarketing tricks and empowered by caller ID, are less and less likely to pick up the phone. The standard industry response rate has fallen from 36% in 1997 to 9% today according to Pew Research. And that can be even lower on cell phones, says Anna Greenberg, Democratic pollster and Vice President at Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research. This means a firm needs to make many more calls to complete a survey—a reality that requires either more time or more interviewers. David Dutwin, Executive Vice President and Chief Methodologist at the opinion research firm SSRS, says 10 years ago, one of every 20 calls would yield a response; now it’s approaching one in 50.

Second, as Americans have rapidly ditched landlines—47% of the population is “cellphone only” by the CDC’s last count—pollsters are increasingly surveying cellphone users, a population that is two to four times more expensive to reach, says Republican pollster Bill McInturff. This price differential is largely due to a law that forbids firms from calling cellphones like they would a landline—i.e. using an “autodialer”— and which requires an interviewer to punch out each number by hand. Last summer, the FCC went even further, issuing a clarification that forbid calls to cellphones from machines that have the “capacity” to autodial (one could argue an iPhone, or just about anything short of a rotary phone, has such capacity).

This controversial ruling effectively forced polling firms to replace their call center equipment, in which the autodialing function could be switched on and off. And such actions still have not protected firms from legal attack; McInturff, who conducts the NBC/WSJ poll and is co-founder of Public Opinion Strategies, says he gets a claim per week accusing his firm of calling a cellphone from an autodialer. “This has become a very difficult, litigious way to try to make a living,” he says.

All told, Greenberg says a national ‘gold standard’ phone survey that two years ago cost $50,000 now costs at least $70,000.

The mounting costs of polls, which are passed on to the campaigns or media outlets that sponsor them, are causing many to experiment with cheaper, but less proven online alternatives or simply do fewer polls. Deeper-pocketed organizations, though, are eating it—reluctantly. “You want the same poll as last year?,” says Evans Witt, CEO of Princeton Survey Research Associates International, “It’ll cost more and take longer to do it. Those are two things you never want to say to a client.”

A version of this article appears in the February 1, 2016 issue of Fortune with the headline “Polling’s Price Tag Rises.”

About the Author
Erika Fry
By Erika Fry
LinkedIn iconTwitter icon
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in Leadership

C-SuiteFortune 500 Power Moves
Fortune 500 Power Moves: Which executives gained and lost power this week
By Fortune EditorsDecember 5, 2025
12 hours ago
Construction workers are getting a salary bump for working on data center projects during the AI boom.
AIU.S. economy
Construction workers are earning up to 30% more and some are nabbing six-figure salaries in the data center boom
By Nino PaoliDecember 5, 2025
13 hours ago
Young family stressed over finances
SuccessWealth
People making six-figure salaries used to be considered rich—now households earning nearly $200K a year aren’t considered upper-class in some states
By Emma BurleighDecember 5, 2025
13 hours ago
Reed Hastings
SuccessCareers
Netflix cofounder started his career selling vacuums door-to-door before college—now, his $440 billion streaming giant is buying Warner Bros. and HBO
By Preston ForeDecember 5, 2025
13 hours ago
Steve Jobs holds up the first iPod Nano
Big TechApple
Apple is experiencing its biggest leadership shake-up since Steve Jobs died, with over half a dozen key executives headed for the exits
By Dave SmithDecember 5, 2025
14 hours ago
SuccessMacKenzie Scott
MacKenzie Scott is trying to close the DEI gap in higher ed, with $155 million in donations this week alone
By Sydney LakeDecember 5, 2025
14 hours ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Economy
Two months into the new fiscal year and the U.S. government is already spending more than $10 billion a week servicing national debt
By Eleanor PringleDecember 4, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Success
‘Godfather of AI’ says Bill Gates and Elon Musk are right about the future of work—but he predicts mass unemployment is on its way
By Preston ForeDecember 4, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Success
Nearly 4 million new manufacturing jobs are coming to America as boomers retire—but it's the one trade job Gen Z doesn't want
By Emma BurleighDecember 4, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Success
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang admits he works 7 days a week, including holidays, in a constant 'state of anxiety' out of fear of going bankrupt
By Jessica CoacciDecember 4, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Real Estate
‘There is no Mamdani effect’: Manhattan luxury home sales surge after mayoral election, undercutting predictions of doom and escape to Florida
By Sasha RogelbergDecember 4, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
Tariffs and the $38 trillion national debt: Kevin Hassett sees ’big reductions’ in deficit while Scott Bessent sees a ‘shrinking ice cube’
By Nick LichtenbergDecember 4, 2025
2 days ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.