• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
TechIBM

IBM aims to replace silicon transistors with carbon nanotubes to keep up with Moore’s Law

By
Stacey Higginbotham
Stacey Higginbotham
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Stacey Higginbotham
Stacey Higginbotham
Down Arrow Button Icon
October 1, 2015, 2:00 PM ET
Image courtesy of IBM.

IBM has developed a way that could help the semiconductor industry continue to make ever more dense chips that are both faster and more power efficient. Strap on your science hats while I explain what IBM has accomplished, and why it matters, because this is a significant step in keeping the information technology industry humming along.

IBM (IBM) researchers have figured out how to move electrons on a carbon nanotube, a structure that is 10,000 times smaller than a human hair and an awesome conductor of electricity. IBM’s breakthrough on Thursday is that it has figured out a way to atomically bond a specific type of metal to a carbon nanotube to create an incredibly tiny contact point needed to move electrons through the carbon nanotube without affecting the performance of the chip. This is a crucial step that should one day let researchers replace silicon transistors with carbon nanotubes.

The research means that chip manufacturers may be able to make chips where the transistors are as close together as 3 nanometers. Currently the most advanced chips are between 14 and 11 nanometers apart, but moving them closer is becoming tough to contemplate. Earlier this year IBM announced with much fanfare that it had made a chip where the transistors were only 7 nanometers apart.

The foundation of our information economy is built on one simple fact. Our computing and storage has gotten cheaper pretty much every two years thanks to the semiconductor manufacturing industry’s ability to cram more transistors on a single chip. By virtue of this trend, known as Moore’s Law, our computers have gotten faster and the amount of stuff we can store on them has increased exponentially.

It’s why our smartphones are more powerful than a supercomputer from 1985 and why we can buy a terabyte of storage for about $50 today. But this progress threatens to grind to a halt because we are reaching the physical limits of manufacturing these ultra-dense semiconductors. As we force the transistors closer together, they tend to start leaking electrons. To solve the leakage problem requires expensive and complicated new manufacturing techniques that the industry spends billions on.

During an investor call earlier this year, Intel’s (INTC) CEO Brian Krzanich admitted that the chip giant, whose co-founder Gordon Moore created Moore’s Law, would not be able to keep up with the pace set by Moore’s Law because it was becoming more difficult to shrink the space between transistors on the chips.

That’s what IBM’s research hopes to help solve. Dario Gil, VP of Science & Technology at IBM Research, tried to convey the importance of this research effort. “The value to IT and users of IT that performance scaling and density has enabled is unprecedented and without equal in the history of mankind,” he said. “To the extent that we can continue pushing that to its limits, we should.”

That’s one reason IBM is spending $3 billion on basic semiconductor research, but it also makes sense. We’re still producing more data that needs to be stored and computed, so if we suddenly reach a plateau in terms of the cost of computing and storage we’re going to also reach a plateau in terms of the innovation curve that relies on processing and analyzing the data we’re generating and bring in from ever more connected devices. Our information economy is built on the falling cost of computing and storage, so if that suddenly changed the economic impact would undoubtedly be huge. You could probably start by saying goodbye to the continuing Amazon Web Service price decreases and the annual feature upgrades in your iPhones.

Subscribe to Data Sheet, Fortune’s daily newsletter on the business of technology.

About the Author
By Stacey Higginbotham
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in Tech

InnovationBrainstorm Design
Procurement execs often don’t understand the value of good design, experts say
By Angelica AngDecember 8, 2025
27 minutes ago
Big TechStreaming
Trump warns Netflix-Warner deal may pose antitrust ‘problem’
By Hadriana Lowenkron, Se Young Lee and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
9 hours ago
Big TechOpenAI
OpenAI goes from stock market savior to burden as AI risks mount
By Ryan Vlastelica and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
9 hours ago
AIData centers
HP’s chief commercial officer predicts the future will include AI-powered PCs that don’t share data in the cloud
By Nicholas GordonDecember 7, 2025
11 hours ago
Future of WorkJamie Dimon
Jamie Dimon says even though AI will eliminate some jobs ‘maybe one day we’ll be working less hard but having wonderful lives’
By Jason MaDecember 7, 2025
15 hours ago
CryptoCryptocurrency
So much of crypto is not even real—but that’s starting to change
By Pete Najarian and Joe BruzzesiDecember 7, 2025
20 hours ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Real Estate
The 'Great Housing Reset' is coming: Income growth will outpace home-price growth in 2026, Redfin forecasts
By Nino PaoliDecember 6, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
AI
Nvidia CEO says data centers take about 3 years to construct in the U.S., while in China 'they can build a hospital in a weekend'
By Nino PaoliDecember 6, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
The most likely solution to the U.S. debt crisis is severe austerity triggered by a fiscal calamity, former White House economic adviser says
By Jason MaDecember 6, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon says Europe has a 'real problem’
By Katherine Chiglinsky and BloombergDecember 6, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Politics
Supreme Court to reconsider a 90-year-old unanimous ruling that limits presidential power on removing heads of independent agencies
By Mark Sherman and The Associated PressDecember 7, 2025
17 hours ago
placeholder alt text
Big Tech
Mark Zuckerberg rebranded Facebook for the metaverse. Four years and $70 billion in losses later, he’s moving on
By Eva RoytburgDecember 5, 2025
3 days ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.