• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
TechGoogle

This is the group that most wants to be forgotten by Google

By
Jacob Davidson
Jacob Davidson
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Jacob Davidson
Jacob Davidson
Down Arrow Button Icon
July 14, 2015, 4:24 PM ET
Google Illustration
BERLIN, GERMANY - JUNE 02: A silhouette of a man and a magnifying glass is seen in front of a screen on which the Google search engine is displayed on June 02, 2014 in Berlin, Germany. (Photo by Michael Gottschalk/Photothek via Getty Images)Photograph by Michael Gottschalk — Photothek via Getty Images

Nearly all of Google’s “right to be forgotten” requests have come from normal citizens trying to protect their privacy, according to a new report from the Guardian.

Last year, the European Union’s highest court affirmed the right of EU residents (and residents of some nearby countries) to ask the search company to remove certain pages from its search results “on the ground that that information may be prejudicial to him or that he wishes it to be ‘forgotten’ after a certain time.”

According to Google’s (GOOG) support page, the company adjudicates requests by balancing “the privacy rights of the individual with the public’s interest to know and the right to distribute information.”

Google has never publicly released data on the how it deals with these requests, which only apply to its European search results. But the Guardian discovered records of the requests in the source code in archived versions of Google’s transparency report.

The London-based paper found over 95% of more than 220,000 requests did not come from public figures, criminals, or politicians, but from regular people seeking to protect their privacy. The Guardian’s data shows roughly half of all requests have been approved, including less than 1% of those that apply to non-typical citizens.

Google acknowledged the paper’s information was authentic, but cautioned that the accounts was merely part of a “test” that was discontinued “because the data was not reliable enough for publication.”

Read more at The Guardian.

About the Author
By Jacob Davidson
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.