• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia

The ‘missile’ Carl Icahn fired at Apple was more like a love note

By
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Down Arrow Button Icon
December 5, 2013, 8:07 AM ET

FORTUNE — From the headlines, you would think that Carl Icahn, America’s most famous corporate raider, had donned a headdress and gone into his war dance:

  • Icahn beats Apple buyback drum (again) with new proposal (CNET)
  • Carl Icahn Rallies Apple Shareholders To Demand Stock Buyback (Cult of Mac)
  • Carl Icahn ups ante in crusade for Apple buyback (Associated Press)
  • Carl Icahn Just Fired A New Missile At Apple (Business Insider)

The source for all this is a tweet from Icahn timed to coincide with his “Master of the Universe” cover story in Time:

“Gave $AAPL notice we’ll be making a precatory proposal to call for vote to increase buyback program, although not at $150 billion level.” (link)

The two key phrases in those 137 characters — phrases the headline writers seem to have missed — were “precatory proposal” and “not at $150 billion level.”

A precatory proposal, from the Latin precari (“to pray”), is a request — not  a “missile” or a “demand” — for a nonbinding shareholder vote that Tim Cook is free to ignore.

And the request Icahn made — for a $50 billion buyback, spread out over a year, per CNBC — is one third of the immediate $150 billion buyback Icahn was talking about just six weeks ago.

Rather than upping his ante, as the AP had it, Icahn may have just folded.

“Tim Cook is doing a good job with the business,” Icahn told Time’s Rana Foroohar, repeating a line he’s used more than a few times. “I think he’s good whether he does what I want or not.”

A $50 billion buyback, as it happens, was the high end of a proposal laid out last month by Bernstein’s Toni Sacconaghi:

“We believe,” Sacconaghi wrote in a Nov. 11 note to clients, “that AAPL ought to commit to an ongoing return of cash and look to take on incremental debt to provide flexibility and enable some upfront share repurchases. Specifically, we believe that a one-time buyback of $30 – $50B, and an ongoing commitment to return 75% of annual free cash flow generated would be viewed positively by investors. Moreover, a 60% dividend/40% buyback split of returned cash would generate a ~3.9% yield at current levels.”

About the Author
By Philip Elmer-DeWitt
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in

Personal Financemortgages
Current mortgage rates report for Dec. 8, 2025: Rates hold steady with Fed meeting on horizon
By Glen Luke FlanaganDecember 8, 2025
40 minutes ago
Personal FinanceReal Estate
Current refi mortgage rates report for Dec. 8, 2025
By Glen Luke FlanaganDecember 8, 2025
40 minutes ago
CryptoBinance
Binance has been proudly nomadic for years. A new announcement suggests it’s finally chosen a headquarters
By Ben WeissDecember 7, 2025
5 hours ago
Big TechStreaming
Trump warns Netflix-Warner deal may pose antitrust ‘problem’
By Hadriana Lowenkron, Se Young Lee and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
8 hours ago
Big TechOpenAI
OpenAI goes from stock market savior to burden as AI risks mount
By Ryan Vlastelica and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
9 hours ago
InvestingStock
What bubble? Asset managers in risk-on mode stick with stocks
By Julien Ponthus, Natalia Kniazhevich, Abhishek Vishnoi and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
9 hours ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Real Estate
The 'Great Housing Reset' is coming: Income growth will outpace home-price growth in 2026, Redfin forecasts
By Nino PaoliDecember 6, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
AI
Nvidia CEO says data centers take about 3 years to construct in the U.S., while in China 'they can build a hospital in a weekend'
By Nino PaoliDecember 6, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
The most likely solution to the U.S. debt crisis is severe austerity triggered by a fiscal calamity, former White House economic adviser says
By Jason MaDecember 6, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon says Europe has a 'real problem’
By Katherine Chiglinsky and BloombergDecember 6, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Big Tech
Mark Zuckerberg rebranded Facebook for the metaverse. Four years and $70 billion in losses later, he’s moving on
By Eva RoytburgDecember 5, 2025
3 days ago
placeholder alt text
Politics
Supreme Court to reconsider a 90-year-old unanimous ruling that limits presidential power on removing heads of independent agencies
By Mark Sherman and The Associated PressDecember 7, 2025
17 hours ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.