• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia

Solyndra finger-pointing

By
Dan Primack
Dan Primack
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Dan Primack
Dan Primack
Down Arrow Button Icon
September 13, 2011, 4:01 PM ET

Solyndra was a bad deal for taxpayers. But that doesn’t necessarily mean it was a corrupt deal.

There has been a lot of finger pointing in the weeks since solar panel maker Solyndra went bankrupt, particularly given that the company called down virtually all of a $535 million loan guarantee from the U.S. Department of Energy. A lot of it has been accusations of crony capitalism, mainly aimed at the Obama Administration.

Two points to consider, as this debacle continues to unfold:

1. Venture capitalists — you know, the folks who invest in start-ups like Solyndra — tend to lean Democratic in their party politics. Nothing close to unanimity, of course, but even a cursory glance at their campaign contributions in 2008 shows this to be the case. Maybe it’s because so many of them live in liberal bastions like San Francisco, Boston and New York. Or maybe not. Whatever the reason, it is what it is.

As such, the fact that a VC-backed recipient of DoE loans happens to have Dem-backing board members should not be surprising. Were McCain to have won and to have given out cleantech loans — a program set up by President Bush, for what it’s worth — most of the VC-backed recipients also would have featured left-leaning board members. Also would have been true for federal loans given to healthcare start-ups or energy start-ups or social media start-ups or grilled cheese sandwich shop start-ups.

2. That said, there should certainly be an investigation into the government’s due diligence on Solyndra. Particularly if some sort of fraud occurred, as suggested by recent FBI raids on both the company’s headquarters and the home of its CEO.

But let’s allow it to play out before jumping to conclusions. Remember, private investors plugged over $1 billion into the company also — including a number of reputable venture capital firms. Sometimes investments just don’t pan out, or smart people all want to believe in the same data points (at the expense of other data points). We should be sure to distinguish between corruption and poor judgment. Or, in the case of fraud, bad actors who pulled the wool over everyone’s eyes.

About the Author
By Dan Primack
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in

CryptoBinance
Binance has been proudly nomadic for years. A new announcement suggests it’s finally chosen a headquarters
By Ben WeissDecember 7, 2025
3 hours ago
Big TechStreaming
Trump warns Netflix-Warner deal may pose antitrust ‘problem’
By Hadriana Lowenkron, Se Young Lee and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
7 hours ago
Big TechOpenAI
OpenAI goes from stock market savior to burden as AI risks mount
By Ryan Vlastelica and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
7 hours ago
InvestingStock
What bubble? Asset managers in risk-on mode stick with stocks
By Julien Ponthus, Natalia Kniazhevich, Abhishek Vishnoi and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
7 hours ago
EconomyTariffs and trade
Macron warns EU may hit China with tariffs over trade surplus
By James Regan and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
7 hours ago
EconomyTariffs and trade
U.S. trade chief says China has complied with terms of trade deals
By Hadriana Lowenkron and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
7 hours ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Real Estate
The 'Great Housing Reset' is coming: Income growth will outpace home-price growth in 2026, Redfin forecasts
By Nino PaoliDecember 6, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
AI
Nvidia CEO says data centers take about 3 years to construct in the U.S., while in China 'they can build a hospital in a weekend'
By Nino PaoliDecember 6, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
The most likely solution to the U.S. debt crisis is severe austerity triggered by a fiscal calamity, former White House economic adviser says
By Jason MaDecember 6, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon says Europe has a 'real problem’
By Katherine Chiglinsky and BloombergDecember 6, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Big Tech
Mark Zuckerberg rebranded Facebook for the metaverse. Four years and $70 billion in losses later, he’s moving on
By Eva RoytburgDecember 5, 2025
3 days ago
placeholder alt text
Politics
Supreme Court to reconsider a 90-year-old unanimous ruling that limits presidential power on removing heads of independent agencies
By Mark Sherman and The Associated PressDecember 7, 2025
15 hours ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.