Almost $20 trillion in revenue—and a record-breaking $1.87 trillion in profits. Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive list of the biggest companies in America.

Fortune 500

The Fortune 500, in its 70th year in 2024, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

The Fortune 500, in its 69th year in 2023, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 68th running of the list.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 67th running of the list.

Based out of Greenwich, Conn., the insurance company offers commercial insurance for property and casualty in countries all around the globe.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 66th running of the list.

F500-2020-402-W.R. Berkley

Based in Greenwich, Conn., Berkley is a holding company for more than 50 entities that specialize in different lines of property and casualty insurance.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 65th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 64th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 63rd running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 62nd running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 61st running of the list. Wal-Mart claims the top spot again. See who made the list.

Wal-Mart stayed on top as its sales crept closer to half-a-trillion dollars. Apple moved into the top five. And UnitedHealth Group continued its steady climb. 

Key Financials (last Fiscal Year)

Revenues ($M)

Profits ($M)

Assets ($M)

Total Stockholder Equity ($M)

Profit Ratios

Profit as % of Revenues

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholder Equity

Earnings Per Share (last Fiscal Year)

Earnings Per Share ($)

EPS % Change (from prior fiscal year)

EPS % Change (5 year annual rate)

EPS % Change (10 year annual rate)

Total Return

Total Return to Investors (last year)

Total Return to Investors (5 year, annualized)

Total Return to Investors (10 year, annualized)

W.R. Berkley Corporation is an international property casualty and health insurance and reinsurance holding company founded in 1967. Through its 58 businesses, it provides insurance for home, auto, fine arts and collectibles, and cyber risk, as well as professional liability products.

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Q4 2024

W.R. Berkley (WRB): Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings

legacy

W.R. Berkley

w.r. berkley

Ladies and gentlemen, good day, and welcome to W. R. Berkeley Corporation's Second Quarter twenty twenty five Earnings Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. The speakers' remarks may contain forward looking statements.

Some of the forward looking statements can be identified by the use of forward looking words, including, without limitation, believes, expects, or estimates. We caution you that such forward looking statements should not be regarded as a representation by us that the future plans, estimates, or expectations contemplated by us will in fact be achieved. Please refer to our annual report on Form 10 k for the year ended 12/31/2024 and our other filings made with the SEC for a description of the business environment in which we operate and the important factors that may materially affect our results. W. Berkley Corporation is not under any obligation and expressly disclaims any such obligation to update or alter its forward looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Rob Berkley. Please go ahead, sir.

Abi, thank you very much, and thank you to all participants for your time today and your interest in the company. In addition to myself, you also have our Executive Chairman, Bill Berkley on the call as well as Rich Baio, our Chief Financial Officer. We're going to follow our typical agenda where momentarily I'll be handing it over to Rich. He'll run us through some highlights from the quarter. He'll then pass it back to me.

I'll offer a few more sound bites, and then we look forward to taking people's questions and for that matter, taking the conversation in any direction participants wish to take it. Before I do hand it over to Rich, perhaps just stating the obvious, it is very much an interesting moment in the property and casualty space. We are reminded of the complications of this industry, an industry where you make a sale before you ultimately truly know your cost of goods sold. We have been grappling with this reality as an industry forever. But there are moments in time when it comes into sharper focus than others.

We certainly over the past several years have had to grapple with financial or economic inflation and that was combined with social inflation, which we have talked about and I suspect we'll continue to talk about. But while on the heels of COVID, financial or economic inflation seems to be brought far more under control, there are some real threats to that. Certainly, are top of mind for all of us. In addition to that, one should not lose sight of what's going on in the labor market and what that may mean for wage inflation over time, particularly around some of the administration policies, that they are in the process of putting into place. And finally, there's the big question around deficits and what that will ultimately mean for the economy.

And lastly, to what extent can we expect The U. S. Consumer to continue to be the driver and allow the economy to remain as resilient as it's been. These are amongst some of the macro questions that we are grappling with. Obviously, there's applicability to both our underwriting activities and how we think about selecting and pricing risk.

And furthermore, I think it goes without saying there's meaningful applicability to the investment portfolio and how we think about positioning that. So as always, lots of moving pieces, trying to not just interpret what they all mean for today, but also how we think about positioning the business going forward. So let me pause there and hand it over to Rich, and I will follow him with a few more sound bites. Rich, over to you please.

Great. Thanks, Rob. The second quarter marked the continuation of strong performance in both underwriting income and net investment income. Net income per diluted share increased 8.7% over the prior year to $1 per share or $4.00 $1,000,000 with an annualized return on beginning of year equity of 19.1 percent. The definition of operating earnings commencing with this quarter has been changed to exclude after tax foreign currency gains and losses.

Accordingly, operating earnings were $420,000,000 or $1.05 per share, yielding an annualized return on beginning of year equity of 20%. Starting with underwriting performance, our current accident year combined ratio before cat losses of 3.2 loss ratio points was 88.4% comprised of an accident year loss ratio excluding cats of 59.9% and expense ratio of 28.5. The calendar year combined ratio was 91.6% resulting in $261,000,000 of underwriting income. Cat losses were $99,000,000 in the 2025 compared with $90,000,000 or 3.2 loss ratio points in the prior year's quarter. While the industry saw an above average frequency of severe storms, the point impact of cat losses on our combined ratio remained flat even as the dollar amount of losses marginally increased with the growth in our property book of business over the prior year.

Drilling down further, the Insurance segment's quarterly accident year loss ratio ex cats was relatively flat year over year and sequentially at 60.7%, bringing the accident year combined ratio before cats to 89%. The Reinsurance and Monoline Excess segment's accident year loss ratio ex cats increased to 54.1% with a strong accident year combined ratio before cats of 83.8%. The expense ratio overall was flat at 28.5% and continue to benefit from the growth in net premiums earned, which was a quarterly record of $3,100,000,000 In addition, net premiums written increased to a record $3,400,000,000 in the quarter with growth in all lines of business in both segments. Record net investment income of $379,000,000 benefited from the ongoing growth in the invested assets from strong operating cash flow and new money rates on fixed maturity securities that remain comfortably above our average book yield. Investment income from fixed maturity securities excluding Argentine inflation linked securities improved 16.5% year over year with an increase in book yield of 20 basis points to 4.7%.

Our investment funds performed above our expected quarterly range of 10,000,000 to $20,000,000 with strong results of $27,000,000 driven by transportation, infrastructure and financial services sectors. The quality of our portfolio remains very strong at a AA- with the duration on our fixed maturity portfolio, including cash and cash equivalents, increasing from the fourth quarter of two point six years to the current quarter of two point eight years. Foreign currency losses in the quarter of $55,000,000 related to the weakening U. S. Dollar relative to most other currencies.

Offsetting this income statement loss is an improvement in the currency translation loss and stockholders' equity of $69,000,000 The effective tax rate was 23.2% in the quarter, which is in line with our expectations for the full year of 2025. The rate exceeds The U. S. Statutory rate of 21% due to taxes on foreign earnings at higher rates and state income taxes. Stockholders' equity increased by more than $380,000,000 or 4.3% over the 2025 to a record $9,300,000,000 After tax unrealized investment losses improved by $120,000,000 to a balance of $249,000,000 as of 06/30/2025.

From a capital management perspective, we paid ordinary and special dividends of $224,000,000 in the quarter, bringing our growth in book value per share before dividends to 6.8% in the quarter and 14.3% on a year to date basis. Our balance sheet remains strong with cash and cash equivalents of more than $2,000,000,000 and historically low financial leverage of 23.4%. So in summary, another great quarter with exceptional risk adjusted returns and excellent underwriting and investment performance. Rob, with that, I'll turn it back to you.

Great, Rich. Thank you very much. So maybe just to follow on Rich's comments, a couple of additional thoughts. First, I think as everyone on the call is acutely aware, this is still very much a cyclical industry. As we have discussed in the past though, one of the changes that has happened over the past, I don't know, sort of five to ten years is a decoupling of product lines as to where they are in the cycle.

So the cyclical nature still exists, but where different major product lines are in the cycle, they are certainly no longer in lockstep. To that end, a couple of thoughts on the insurance marketplace. One, the property market, clearly, marketplace is becoming more competitive as we have discussed for a couple of quarters now. Probably two drivers there, one would be a reinsurance marketplace that is becoming more competitive and is willing to provide capacity at a lower rate. And the second piece is as discussed by some the MGA market, which is becoming clearly more active and I'll offer a few thoughts on the MGA market a little bit later in my comments.

I would tell you that the property market, there is a notable bifurcation while the general direction is more competitive. The larger accounts, particularly shared and layered as we've discussed in the past couple of quarters is where greater competition is. The smaller accounts, it's not that there isn't competition, but it pales in comparison to the larger end of town. As far as commercial transportation, again, another product line where there is a fair amount of activity coming from MGAs. That marketplace, we continue to and others seem to be pushing for rate.

But without a doubt, the MGA participants are creating at least a short term headwind for that market truly going hard. My expectation is that that's a bit of a kink in the hose, if you will. And consequently, it is going to build up pressure and ultimately will inure to the benefit of responsible long term participates when that snaps and the market shifts. Professional liability, again, a bit of a mixed bag as we all have a shared appreciation, a very broad space. Just a couple of highlights on D and O.

It would seem as though the public D and O market is beginning to find some sense of bottom. Private and non for profit D and O remains particularly competitive as the sum of what I would define as miscellaneous E and O. There is again an MGA component to it since people seem to be very fixated on the topic. I thought I'd flag that as well. As far as the casualty lines, clearly there is opportunity to get the rate that the product line needs.

It is pronounced both in the primary casualty as well as the umbrella and excess. And finally, as far as workers' compensation goes, presumably all had an opportunity to take note of the action coming out of California. I think some time ago, we had flagged for those that were willing to listen that it seemed as though California as opposed to in the more distant past this time around is out in front of the rest of the market as far as firming. I think the action taken by the commissioner approving 8.7% effective nineone percent certainly a strong message that was well received by us and we look forward to more coming behind that. I think one other comment I would make would be around the consumer space, particularly P and C personal lines.

As you all know, we have a meaningful participation in the private client space, which is a very different business from what I would define as mass market. It is a part of the market that is built or driven by knowledge and expertise, and we have a a business that is really coming into its own in that space and has been a great contributor not just to the top line, but to the the bottom line as well. And those market conditions remain ripe and we are pleased to have that opportunity. I mentioned reinsurance earlier as far as the reinsurance marketplace providing capacity within the property lines, perhaps the discipline I think eroding. I think we've talked about that in the past.

It continues to erode. We'll have to see how quickly it remains and what the how steep the trajectory is, I should say. And finally, we've expressed our disappointment with the discipline, particularly on the casualty lines within the reinsurance space. I offered a couple of sound bites about MGAs just as a broad category earlier. And within the industry, people tend to oftentimes use some terminology, perhaps somewhat casually and almost interchangeably around MGA, MGU, and ultimately really falls under the category, if you like, of delegated authority.

There is no doubt that inherently in many of the delegated authority models, there is a mismatch or a lack of alignment in of interest between those with the pen and those with the capital. It is not that all of these relationships are bad. Some of them are quite good. One just needs to have their eyes wide open and understand that it is not a perfect alignment of interests and make sure that it is controlled appropriately. That having been said, there has been extraordinary growth in the MGA space.

A lot of it has been generated by new entrants that lack expertise. A lot of it has been supported by reinsurance capacity that seems to have an unquenchable thirst for growth without necessarily their finger fully on the pulse. We'll have to see how this plays out. I think for many of us that have been around for at least a little while and those that have been particularly those that have been around for a long while have seen some version of this movie. You know, in some ways, it's the same.

In other ways, it's different. Perhaps the only difference is that it's a different cast of characters. One final anecdote on the NGA front, I would tell you that over the last sixty to ninety days, it's been a startling number of inbound calls that we have gotten from investment bankers suggesting that MGAs that they have to sell, would we be interested in buying them? And typically, they are capitalized or owned by private equity. So oftentimes perhaps a leading indicator that the music is slowing and we'll see who has a seat at the end, though oftentimes that does take some time.

Rich, as always, did a really thorough job as it relates to the quarter and the numbers, I would just call out the rate at the 7.6% ex comp continues to be meaningful and puts us in a comfortable place. Rich talked about the loss ratio. Again, I'm not going to go into a chapter and verse. The 3.2 points of cat was really frequency by industry standards modest severity. And then lastly, would have it's worth noting the duration of the investment portfolio edging out to two point eight years.

Again, think this is exactly what we suggested we would be doing if the story unfolded the way it has. We continue to believe that our strategy is the right one, making sure that we are getting an appropriate risk adjusted return. I think as Rich alluded to the cash flow of the organization remains very healthy. The growth in the investment portfolio remains quite significant. And if you think about a new money rate for us today is running about give or take 5.25% and the book yield on the portfolio ex Argentina is 4.7 that certainly bodes well for where investment income is going for the foreseeable.

So long story short, we can't control the environment, but we can control our actions. We remain very focused on making good risk adjusted returns. The decoupling of product lines and how they make their way through the cycle combined with the breadth of our offering allows us to continue to grow when others perhaps are experiencing more of a headwind. In our opinion, you certainly are seeing different product lines at different points of transition. We have historically and continue to be more of a liability market and we think that much of the liability market is where the opportunity will likely be over the next twelve to thirty six months.

So again, we think we're well positioned on the underwriting side. We think we're well positioned on the investment side. And it is our expectation that we will be able to continue to grow earnings in a very thoughtful and controlled manner. So with that, Abby, I will take a pause and we're very pleased to open it up for questions. Thank you.

Thank you. And we will now begin the question and answer session. If you have dialed in and would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad to raise your hand and join the queue. If you would like to withdraw your question, simply press star 1 a second time. If you are called upon to ask your question and are listening via speakerphone on your device, please pick up your handset and ensure that your phone is not on mute when asking your question.

Again, it is star one if you would like to join the queue. And our first question comes from the line of Rob Cox with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.

Yes, just first question on growth. Just thinking about the growth potential here. I know it's a tougher quarter with the property pricing deceleration. But just curious if you all still view this as sort of a 10% to 15% growth environment? Or has the last few quarters changed that?

Look, I think we had come out with that band, if you will, probably, I don't know, call it eighteen months ago, maybe twenty four months ago. If you're asking my best guesstimate at this stage in spite of the number that we saw in this quarter, my view is that it's probably somewhere between eight and twelve would be my guess as opposed to 10 to 15.

Okay. Got it. That's helpful. And then just curious on the underlying loss ratio. I think last quarter you all mentioned that the impact of the outward reinsurance program was a business mix related headwind.

This quarter the underlying loss ratio at least in insurance seems pretty flat. Anything else unusual to call out there or is that just normal dynamics?

I think it continues to primarily be mix as far as the loss ratio.

And our next question comes from the line of Alex Scott with Barclays. Your line is open.

Hey, good afternoon. You mentioned tariffs and labor costs in your opening remarks. And I just wanted to understand if you're actually seeing anything coming through, if that's more of a forward looking statement. And obviously, there's a wide range outlook.

It is a forward looking statement. We are not seeing it in any noteworthy way in our loss activity right now. At the same time, we are conscious of the fact that that concept of timing, that I referenced in conjunction with the point that you're flagging, and we wanna make sure that we're not caught flat footed. I think that at this stage, given the, what we're seeing coming out of the administration, it's it's hard to imagine that that tariffs are going to prove this to be something that goes away, but we'll see. And as far as the the labor piece goes, you know, from our perspective, you know, ultimately, when when the day is all done, just given the the position around immigration immigration and related activities and the actions that the administration are putting into place, there is no doubt that there are certain jobs that are gonna meet need to be filled at a different payroll point than they have been. And ultimately, that presumably will drive labor costs.

That makes sense. Second one I have is on the trajectory of margins from here. I mean pricing still remaining pretty firm. It seems like you guys are being disciplined and still getting pretty good rate in there. But just wanted to understand, is it still above loss cost trend? Can margins still improve from here or remain flat?

And would you expect sort of the mix shift with casualty being the bigger opportunity maybe to affect it one way or the other?

I think when the day is all done, we feel comfortable that the rate that we are achieving is positioning us well, not just for today, but for tomorrow as well. So can things in improve here? Yeah. I think things can, improve from here. But at the same time, we are all regularly reminded that there is no reward for declaring victory prematurely.

And in addition to that, we are also regularly reminded of all of the significantly leveraged variables that one should not reach a conclusion about prematurely.

And our next question comes from the line of Elyse Greenspan with Wells Fargo. Your line is open.

Hi, thanks. Good evening. My first question is actually on capital. You guys didn't buy back any shares in the quarter. Just wondering what drove that decision?

Look, ultimately, Elyse, when the day is all done, as we've shared with you and others in the past, we have a view as to how much capital we have and what type of surplus we have at any moment in time. We have a view as to what we see as opportunities potentially before us and want to make sure that we have a surplus of gas in the tank. And in addition to that, ultimately, there's a judgment made around to the extent there's above and beyond what is the most efficient way to return that to shareholders. As Rich flagged in his notes, it's not that we weren't returning capital to shareholders, We returned a few $100,000,000 to shareholders. It just seemed at that moment in time that the most efficient and effective way to return the money to the people that belonged was through a a special dividend.

I would strongly encourage you and others not to lead to the assumption that that we are out of the repurchase market because that is not the case. We evaluate that tool along with other tools every day. And again, what we think is the most practical answer to the surplus of capital question. Obviously, we can do our own math as others can do their math as to what we believe real book value is as opposed to this cockamamie accountant version of math. And we also have a view on the earnings power of the business going forward, which I would add we are quite optimistic about.

So again, I would encourage you not to count us out of the repurchase activity.

Thanks. And then my second question, you guys gave the underlying loss ratios right by segment. So I back into around, I guess, 6,000,000 adverse in insurance and I think just around $8,000,000 favorable in reinsurance. Within that $6,000,000 in insurance, is there anything, obviously, a large amount of reserves, but anything to call out that, you know, particularly moved relative, to your reserves in the quarter?

Nothing particularly noteworthy. It's just that, you know, as we've shared with you and others in the past, you know, we look at it every 90 days. Well, we're looking at every day, but every 90 days, we're looking at it at a pretty granular level and, you know, a couple of bits and pieces moving around. That's all.

And our next question comes from the line of Mike Zaremski with BMO Capital Markets. Your line is open.

Hey. Good afternoon, Rob. On the 15% Mitsui stake, any update on the the time frame and timeline there?

I know no more than anybody else or at least anybody else who bothered to read the SEC filings. Again, I think as we I don't know if we shared or not. If we didn't, I should have. That we, design, have not been privy to sort of where they stand in their process because in no way, shape, or form, perhaps back to one of Elise's points, we don't want to be encumbered or restricted in any way in our ability to repurchase stock. So the short answer is I have no idea.

Understood. But we'll we we should see disclosure once it gets it's over 5 percent. Is that correct?

I do I have a high degree of confidence that they will fully comply with any regulation from the SEC from a filing perspective. I've my understanding is that I think to comply with the SEC, they're gonna need to do a filing once they reach, 4.99 or call it 5%. And as far as I'm aware, they have not done that yet.

Got it. Understood. Maybe pivoting, Rob, to, the medical inflation environment as it pertains to your work comp and, I believe also stop loss portfolio. You know, we are obviously seeing all the headlines that you've been seeing. You know, any updates to and you mentioned California as well, obviously, earlier, but any any kind of updates on the macro level to the Berkeley's views on medical inflation potentially making their way into the comp and or A and H arena?

Well, I think it has been and continues to be something that our colleagues and by extension Rich, the chairman and I are are focused on. And, you know, as we've discussed, it's a very leveraged assumption. Maybe the only other wild card that I I would layer on top, Mike, is, you know, the the commentary that has come out of the administration regarding its desire to onshore pharmaceutical, in particular, manufacturing. And I think it was just a couple of weeks ago that there was a comment that came from the president that suggested he was entertaining the possibility of a 200% tariff on all pharmaceuticals that are imported. That having been said, I just read earlier, today that the discussions with the EU would suggest there would be no tariffs on, pharmaceuticals or medical devices.

So, you know, I think for all of us, the message perhaps is just stay tuned. But without a doubt, if we saw a levy to the tune of, 200% on pharmaceuticals, that's something that would have an impact. And perhaps to jump ahead and and, anticipate your question, yes, we have done quite a bit of sensitivity analysis as to what that would mean for us. And at the moment, we feel comfortable that we can manage through that.

Okay. That's that's helpful. And then lastly, Rich, I believe I heard you talk about the new operating earnings, a non GAAP definition. Any just we'll go back and check, but does that change historicals by like very low single digits? And any any reasoning we, we should be aware of on on why the change?

I think it's really a couple of things. One, what we've noticed, and we've had some conversations with some of the equity analysts over the last few quarters in terms of some of the volatility that's been coming about as a result of, some of the changes that Rob has alluded to since the new administration. And with the equity analyst not really including it because it's not modeled in, we felt it was a a more straightforward approach with regards to, having foreign currency gains and losses excluded. And you would see if you were to go back over time, there has been some volatility from period to period, but in particular over the last couple of quarters, we've seen quite a bit.

And our next question comes from the line of Andrew Kligerman with TD Cowen. Your line is open.

How are you? So Rob, you mentioned in the write up rate increases were 7.6% ex workers' comp. And I know that you're kind of writing a more specialized higher risk line. So I was just kind of curious, how is the workers' comp pricing doing in that arena? And any other color on the workers' comp in addition to your prepared remarks you might call out?

Well, thanks for the question, Andrew. The answer is that I think what you perhaps are referring to is some of the higher hazard stuff where we see growth opportunities from time to time. Saw particularly in the first quarter, it was still there in the second quarter, but perhaps not to the the same street. That having been said, we we do like the pricing there, and that's why we're leaning into it. And while we maintain a little bit more of a defensive posture with the main street stuff, the what I would define as the higher hazard, more specialty in nature, we're we're very pleased with the opportunities that that we see there.

Got it. And you Rob, you you mentioned in your remarks some some disappointment with commercial auto. As I look at the numbers in your release, net written premium looked up it looked like it was up roughly 10%. So is that all just rate and and you're just are you feeling confident in the book that you have?

Yes. We're confident in the book. And as far is it rate? The answer is yes and and then some.

And our next question comes from the line of Mark Hughes with Truist. Your line is open.

Thank you. Hello, Rob. Hello, Rich. On the, other liability line, the growth was just a little bit slower this quarter. You expressed some kind of continuing optimism about primary and excess.

At the same time, you kind of dialed back your growth outlook just a little bit. Are you seeing any kind of inflection in that core GL or excess market? Or is that still consistent with prior couple of quarters?

Yes. We're still encouraged by the opportunity that we see there. So my recalibrating, if you will, as far as the growth opportunity is really a couple of fold. One, on the commercial property opportunity, I think that there's going to be a bit more of a headwind. I think the casualty piece that you just referred to, I think that opportunity very much remains there.

I also think just going back to the commercial auto piece, I think that that will prove to be a terrific opportunity, but it's gonna take a little bit longer to to get there. On the other hand, I think that on the the reinsurance front, property, in particular, has probably seen its best day for some time. And for the life of me, I don't understand why the casualty marketplace isn't getting a little more backbone.

Yeah. On the, MGAs that are knocking on your door, is that always a hard no, or is that something you might consider if the valuation was right? Or are they just, their expectations are above and beyond what you'd ever consider paying?

You know, ultimately, the day is all done, we evaluate every opportunity as you'd expect on it on its own merit. Having been said, you know, we we take, the expertise and the responsibility to capital very both of those things very seriously. So while we're always open to conversations, it's a pretty high hurdle to truly get us to wanna engage.

And our next question comes from the line of David Motemaden with Evercore ISI. Your line is open.

Hey, Rob. Good afternoon. Just a follow-up question maybe there to Mark's question. You had mentioned the bifurcated property market between large and small or large and small and middle, maybe we'll call it SMID. Do you see that dynamic going in the opposite direction in some of the other markets like casualty where maybe large accounts are seeing some rate increase acceleration and that's yet to really seep down and play out in the small to middle market?

Or, you know, just hoping to get some color there in terms of how you're thinking about the opportunity.

Look. I I think taking a half a step back, focusing on the the, casualty stuff, both primary and access, I think the reality is that social inflation impacts the full spectrum. That having been said, without a doubt, plaintiff attorneys tend to view limits as candy. And so the bigger the limits that are available, the more focus they get. That has been the case for some number of years at this stage.

Do I think that we have seen an effort amongst the plaintiff attorney to go a little bit down market? Yeah. I I do, but not dramatically. So when the day is all done, I think my expectation is that you're gonna continue to see opportunity in some of the the larger end of town, and that will continue to really waterfall through the whole casualty marketplace. The good news is for the smaller accounts, they tend to be a little bit more insulated, and the rate environment tends to be a little bit more sticky.

So similar to perhaps one of the points you were making, the property market, the larger accounts are the ones that get targeted and you get the greatest feeding frenzy around early on. Well, that applies to casualty too. So the rates are going up on the larger accounts in casualty, but the smaller and middle market is following and it tends to be stickier.

Thanks. And then maybe just follow-up here just on the tariffs. At least on the insurance side, it didn't really look like there was anything going on in terms of the loss pick reinsurance. The underlying loss ratio did tick up. It doesn't look like you guys have embedded that into your view of loss trend.

Maybe just you know, how are you thinking about that? And and, you know, is that something you guys are considering doing?

W.R. Berkley Q2 2025 Earnings Call Transcript | Fortune

Companies

John Kell

Honeywell Connected Enterprise CTO and President Suresh Venkatarayalu and Caterpillar CTO Jaime Mineart at Fortune Brainstorm Tech 2025.

Honeywell, Caterpillar CTOs say AI can ease labor, skills gaps in manufacturing

/2025/09/17/honeywell-caterpillar-ctos-say-ai-can-ease-labor-skills-gaps-in-manufacturing/

Fortune Editors

Fortune 500 Power Moves: Which executives gained and lost power, Sept. 6–12, 2025

/2025/09/12/fortune-500-power-moves-sept-6-12/

e.l.f. Beauty’s CDIO says she’s responsible for AI’s foundation, but that these tools aren’t an IT mandate

/2025/09/10/e-l-f-beautys-cdio-says-shes-responsible-for-ais-foundation-but-that-these-tools-arent-an-it-mandate/

Phil Wahba

Why Walmart’s U.S. CEO says staffing levels will remain steady even as A.I. becomes a bigger part of work

/2025/09/09/walmart-ai-jobs-brainstorm-tech/

Jessica Mathews

DoorDash CEO Tony Xu says path to autonomous deliveries filled with ‘lots of pain and suffering’ but company is nearing first inning of commercial progress

W.R. Berkley (WRB) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Company Participants