The companies on the Global 500 employ 70.2 million people, and their revenue represents more than one-third of the world’s GDP.

Fortune Global 500

With a combined revenue of $21 trillion and $2.1 trillion in profits, the 2026 Fortune 500 is the definitive list of America's largest companies.

Fortune 500

The 300 companies on this year’s list brought in over $12.5 trillion in revenue for the latest 12 months, with the median revenue figure at $24 billion.

America's Most Innovative Companies

AI is a major force shaping this year’s list—but it’s far from the only story.

World's Most Admired Companies

The corporations on our annual list of the world's 500 largest companies combined to generate $41.7 trillion in revenue over the past year.

Almost $20 trillion in revenue—and a record-breaking $1.87 trillion in profits. Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive list of the biggest companies in America.

The 300 companies on this year’s list brought in over $12.6 trillion in revenue for the latest 12 months, with the median revenue figure at $22 billion.

Leaders in all industries rely more than ever on Big Tech—and appreciate the giants that deliver, at scale, without drama.

The corporations on our annual list posted aggregate revenues of $41 trillion for the second year in a row.

Industries included in the sector are beverages, food consumer products, and food production.

Fortune Sector Leaders: Food, Beverages, and Tobacco

The Fortune 500, in its 70th year in 2024, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

The 25th Fortune World’s Most Admired Companies list suggests that tech giants’ peers respect them as much as ever.

The corporations on our annual list of the world’s largest companies delivered a record $41 trillion in aggregate revenues.

The 300 companies on this list are transforming industries from the inside out.

The Fortune 500, in its 69th year in 2023, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

F500-2023-080-Tyson Foods

Tyson Foods is among the world’s largest meat processors. Based in Springdale, Ark., the company recorded $53 billion in revenue, up 13% from the previous year, and projected a robust 2023. 
<ul> 
 	<li>Rising inflation and supply-chain snarls in 2022 trickled down to food, prompting Tyson to increase prices on some of its meats. Such factors, combined with a tighter consumer budget, led to mixed results across Tyson’s product portfolio. For instance, sales of pork and beef decreased, while chicken sales increased, a sign of consumers opting for cheaper proteins.</li> 
 	<li>The company’s CFO and fourth-generation heir, John R. Tyson, was arrested in November 2022 and charged with public intoxication and criminal trespassing. He pleaded guilty, apologized, and received the board’s backing to stay in his role at Tyson Foods.</li> 
 	<li>The company announced plans in December 2022 to consolidate its offices in Illinois and South Dakota and move corporate workers to its headquarters in Arkansas.</li> 
</ul>

Just as it dominates our economy, Big Tech now dominates Fortune’s annual ranking of corporate reputation.

Aggregate sales hit $37.8 trillion last year—an increase of 19%, the highest annual growth rate in the list’s history.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 68th running of the list.

F500-2022-082-Tyson Foods

Tyson Foods is the world’s second-largest meat processor and marketer. The company has struggled with absenteeism at its production facilities due to the pandemic, as well as supply-chain challenges and inflation. Tyson has largely been able to pass those costs through to customers, however, and profit was up substantially in both 2021 and the first quarter of 2022. In June 2021, Tyson announced a goal of achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050; and in 2022, the company invested $60 million toward providing free education for its U.S. employees.

After a year in which humanity leaned more heavily than ever on tech giants, see which companies topped Fortune's ranking of corporate reputation.

Total revenue for the world’s biggest companies fell 4.8% to $31.7 trillion this year—the first decline in half a decade.

<span data-sheets-value="{&quot;1&quot;:2,&quot;2&quot;:&quot;Despite plant closures and mass COVID-19 infections in its workforce, Tyson, the biggest meat producer in the U.S., ended the 2020 fiscal year with net revenues of $43.2 billion, a nearly 2% increase from 2019. After discontinuing a patty made of a mix of real beef and pea protein launched in 2019, Tyson recently debuted an expanded selection of 100% vegan products, including plant-based ground beef, bratwurst, and Italian sausage. The launch comes as the company pushes to gain market share in the plant-based foods market dominated by Beyond Meat and Impossible Foods.&quot;}" data-sheets-userformat="{&quot;2&quot;:14721,&quot;3&quot;:{&quot;1&quot;:0},&quot;10&quot;:2,&quot;11&quot;:4,&quot;14&quot;:{&quot;1&quot;:2,&quot;2&quot;:0},&quot;15&quot;:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;16&quot;:11}">Despite plant closures and mass COVID-19 infections in its workforce, Tyson, the biggest meat producer in the U.S., ended the 2020 fiscal year with net revenues of $43.2 billion, a nearly 2% increase from 2019. After discontinuing a patty made of a mix of real beef and pea protein launched in 2019, Tyson recently debuted an expanded selection of 100% vegan products, including plant-based ground beef, bratwurst, and Italian sausage. The launch comes as the company pushes to gain market share in the plant-based foods market dominated by Beyond Meat and Impossible Foods.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 67th running of the list.

F500-2021-73-Tyson Foods

For an astounding 13th straight year, Apple claims the top spot in Fortune’s annual ranking of corporate reputation, based on a survey of almost 3,800 executives, directors, and analysts.

This year's Fortune Global 500 generated $33.3 trillion in revenues and $2.1 trillion in profits.

G500-2020-287-Tyson-Foods

Tyson CEO Noel White, who was tapped for the top spot in September 2018, made good on his promise to expand into international markets in 2019. The Arkansas-based meat giant acquired the Thai and European operations of Brazilian food processor BRF S.A., giving it a scalable footprint in Asia and across Europe via an array of regional brands, like Grabits, Hot ‘N’ Kickin’ Chicken, Speedy Pollo, and Sadia. The company also launched its Raised &amp; Rooted brand to introduce “value-added protein” options, often in highly specialized forms like plant-based nuggets or blended burgers. The company ended 2019 with $42.4 billion in revenue, a 5.8% increase from 2018. April 2020 presented a brand new challenge, as the company shut down plants temporarily as hundreds of workers tested positive for COVID-19.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 66th running of the list.

F500-2020-079-Tyson

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2019 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune Global 500 generated $27.7 trillion in revenues and $1.5 trillion in profits.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 65th running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2018 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 64th running of the list.

Here’s our look at 57 companies that do well by doing good.

Change the World

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2017 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 63rd running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2016 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune Global 500 generated $27.6 trillion in revenues and $1.5 trillion in profits.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 62nd running of the list.

Business insiders have spoken: Asked which companies they most admire, more than 4,100 executives, directors, and analysts chose these top 50 All-Stars.

The world's 500 largest companies generated $31.2 trillion in revenues and $1.7 trillion in profits in 2014. Together, this year's Fortune Global 500 employ 65 million people worldwide and are represented by 36 countries.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 61st running of the list. Wal-Mart claims the top spot again. See who made the list.

Global business is back. After limping through a worldwide financial crisis and economic slowdown, the 500 largest companies ranked by revenues shattered all sorts of performance records in 2013: They racked up combined revenues of $31.1 trillion, up 2.5% from 2012, and profits soared 27% to nearly $2 trillion. China’s 95 companies (up from 89 last year) posted $5.8 trillion in revenues. The U.S. has four fewer companies on the list than last year but remains (for now) the country leader, with 128 corporations on the list—including No. 1 Wal-Mart Stores—reporting $8.6 trillion in revenues. 

Wal-Mart stayed on top as its sales crept closer to half-a-trillion dollars. Apple moved into the top five. And UnitedHealth Group continued its steady climb. 

Sector

Industry

Current All-Star Rank

Previous All-Star Rank

Industry Rank

Previous Industry Rank

Overall Score

Innovation

People Management

Use of Corporate Assets

Social Responsibility

Quality of Management

Financial Soundness

Long-Term Investment Value

Quality of Products/Services

Global Competitiveness

Strongest Dimension

Years on list

Previous rank

State

Key Financials (last Fiscal Year)

Revenues ($M)

Profits ($M)

Assets ($M)

Total Stockholder Equity ($M)

Profit Ratios

Profit as % of Revenues

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholder Equity

Earnings Per Share (last Fiscal Year)

Earnings Per Share ($)

EPS % Change (from prior fiscal year)

EPS % Change (5 year annual rate)

EPS % Change (10 year annual rate)

Total Return

Total Return to Investors (last year)

Total Return to Investors (5 year, annualized)

Total Return to Investors (10 year, annualized)

Founded in 1935, Tyson is a global food company that operates in four segments: prepared foods, pork, chicken, and beef. It processes live farm animals, manufactures frozen food, and sells products to retailers and wholesalers.

Q3 2026

Q2 2026

Q1 2026

Q4 2025

Q3 2025

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Tyson Foods (TSN): Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings

legacy

Tyson Foods

tyson foods

Good morning and welcome to the Tyson Foods first quarter 2026 earnings conference call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your touch tone phone. To withdraw your question, please press star and then two. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Jon Kathol, VP Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Good morning and welcome to Tyson Foods first quarter fiscal 2026 earnings conference call. On today's call, Tyson's President and Chief Executive Officer Donnie King, Chief Financial Officer Curt Calaway, and Chief Operating Officer Devin Cole will provide prepared remarks. Following the prepared remarks, we will have a Q&A session with the participants who will be joined by our Chief Growth Officer Kristina Lambert. We have also provided a supplemental presentation which may be referenced on today's call and is available on the Tyson's Investor Relations website and via the link in our webcast. During today's call, we will make forward-looking statements regarding our expectations for the future. These forward-looking statements made during this call are provided pursuant to the Safe Harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Forward-looking statements include all comments reflecting our expectations, assumptions, or beliefs about future events or performance that do not relate solely to historical periods. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions which may cause actual results to differ materially from our current projections. Please refer to our forward-looking statement disclaimers on slide 2 as well as our SEC filings for additional information concerning risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our projections. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

Today's segment results are presented on a segment operating income level and will be discussed on an adjusted basis. The primary difference between segment operating income and the method used in previous quarters is that we will no longer allocate corporate expenses and amortization down to the segment level.

Donnie and Curt will share more thoughts on the change in their prepared remarks. We have recast previously reported quarterly results for the previous three fiscal years to reflect the new format. The segment change has no impact on consolidated historical US GAAP financial results. The recast financial information is accessible through the events and presentation section of the company's Investor Relations website at ir.tyson.com. Please note that the references to earnings per share, segment operating income, operating income, and operating margin in our remarks are on an adjusted basis for our fiscal periods unless otherwise noted. For reconciliations of these non-GAAP measures to their corresponding GAAP measures, please refer to our earnings press release. Now I will turn the call over to Donnie.

Thank you, John. Thanks to everyone joining us today. Before walking you through our first quarter results, I want to remind everyone of what we're building at Tyson: a diversified, protein-centric company positioned to capture growing demand for high-quality protein. We're driving operational excellence, investing in our branded portfolio and innovation to capture market share, and deploying our capital strategically to strengthen our competitive position. Our Q1 results, with sales increasing to more than $14 billion, demonstrate our initiatives and our strategy are clearly working. We're driving operational excellence daily, and the team is energized for what's ahead.

As John mentioned, we've made an important change to our segment reporting measure from Adjusted Operating Income to Segment Operating Income, as this will allow you, the investor, to see the results in the same manner that I utilize to judge the effectiveness of our business decisions and accountability for the choices we make. This empowers our business leaders to pursue volume growth and enhance their decision-making based on a more direct view of the impacts of those decisions without corporate expenses and amortization, which are more fixed in nature. Of course, we will continue to focus on reducing that spend and maximizing efficiencies in our corporate functions.

On the businesses, Prepared Foods took another step forward this quarter with sales increasing in volume, channel mix, and pass-through pricing. Segment Operating Income increased to $338 million. Importantly, our products are winning in the marketplace during a clearly dynamic consumer backdrop.

Our Prepared Foods business is capturing more market share by volume and dollars, driven by increased brand investments and targeted MAP spending that is showing favorable returns. Our production facilities continue to make performance improvements through operational efficiencies. The Chicken segment delivered another strong quarter with $459 million in Segment Operating Income, a margin of 10.9%, in a less favorable operating environment. These positive sales and earnings gains were fueled by more efficient marketing and promotional expenses. Results are becoming increasingly more sustainable and predictable with plenty of untapped potential in the areas we can control within the business. Chicken is an affordable, high-quality protein, and our value-added offerings position us uniquely to serve both retail and food service customers.

In the first quarter, we announced the strategic decision in our beef business to close our Lexington, Nebraska facility and scale back operations at our Amarillo, Texas plant to a single shift. These changes were implemented in January, and as a result, our first quarter results do not reflect the impact of these operational adjustments. We recognize the impact on people's lives, and we did not make them lightly. At the same time, we made this necessary choice to right-size our beef operations with a smaller and more efficient footprint, higher capacity utilization, and stronger alignment with the long-term outlook for the U.S. cattle herd. These decisions position us to improve our overall beef capacity utilization and to compete more effectively in the beef business, both now and in the future. Continuing to absorb losses like we have been seeing for the past two years is simply unacceptable.

Looking forward, we expect cattle supplies to remain tight throughout 2026 and 2027. During this period, chicken is likely to continue to benefit most from the changing consumer preferences, both at retail and in food service, and we're obviously well positioned to win. Once again, our pork segment performed well in a stable operating environment. We continue to increase yield and revenue by developing more value-added products. All parts of the pork value chain, from hog supply, pork production, through retail and food service customers, are in relative balance, allowing for more predictable and stable operating margins.

Finally, our international segment continued its momentum and had another good quarter. Now let me share with you why we are very well positioned relative to what's occurring in the food industry. A recent development beneficial for Tyson Foods was the release of the new U.S. dietary guidelines. As you are aware, healthcare costs are rising, and it is important to have viable solutions to combat the challenge of obesity and inadequate nutrition. These updated guidelines and recommendations represent a historic validation of our core mission: providing high-quality, essential protein to millions. By advocating for increased animal protein consumption as a leading pillar of a healthy lifestyle, the administration has underscored what we have always known: animal protein is a foundational building block of a nutritious diet.

As the producer of one out of every five pounds of chicken, beef, and pork in the United States, Tyson is uniquely positioned as the leader in this real protein space. As the demand for protein continues to increase, Tyson will be there to meet this demand. These policy recommendations underscore how public health priorities and consumer demand for high-quality protein are moving in the same direction.

Even in a dynamic economic environment, protein remains essential in the grocery cart, with consumers continuing to favor chicken, beef, and pork. The updated guidelines also recommend limiting artificial flavors, petroleum-based dyes, and artificial preservatives. At Tyson, we have been ahead of this curve and have already proactively removed petroleum-based synthetic dyes and other ingredients, including high-fructose corn syrup, across our U.S. branded portfolio. By simplifying our labels and using the same ingredients you can find in your pantry, we're providing consumers what they are looking for: protein. It's real food that tastes good and is good for you. We're confident that this commitment to quality will continue to drive superior value for our customers and our shareholders. Let me now tell you about how we are winning in the market.

According to Nielsen data, total category food and beverage retail volume declined 1.8%, with dollars up 0.9% over 13 weeks ending in December. In contrast, our retail branded products, which include our national and regional brands, grew by 2.5% in volume and 3.6% in dollars, significantly outperforming the broader sector. This retail growth was broad-based, highlighted by strong volume performances across several national and regional brands and categories. A few examples include Tyson national and regional branded fresh chicken, up 10.7%; Hillshire Farm lunchmeats increased by 10.4%; Hillshire Snacking grew by 12.5%; and Aidells sausage went up 7.2%. In addition to the volume growth, all four grew dollars and shares. We're also performing well in food service, with share gains and volume growth of 27 basis points.

Our ongoing investments in innovation, wider distribution, and effective targeted marketing are driving growth and keeping us competitive, providing substantial opportunities for further progress. As more shoppers turn to the perimeter of the store, we're meeting their demand for fresh, high-quality options. This is why it matters. Demand for Tyson Foods products continues to grow, and we are well positioned to capture this momentum. While some companies face challenges in generating demand, our share gains demonstrate both our strength and our expectation for further growth, an essential driver of our ongoing and future success.

Our focus on protein-centric offerings, combined with disciplined capital allocation, enables us to accelerate expansion, optimize operations, and reinforce our supply chain and marketing capabilities. As a 90-year-old American company, we provide durability, trust, and strategic continuity across cycles. These strengths allow us to deliver lasting value to our customers, consumers, team members, and shareholders. Looking ahead, the opportunities before us are more promising than ever, and I'm very confident in our portfolio and in our strategy. With that, I'll turn it over to Devin to take you through the segments in more detail.

Thank you, Donnie, and good morning. In the first quarter, our team made tangible progress toward our strategic objectives, and we remain committed to delivering best-in-class performance and holding ourselves accountable to our customers' and consumers' expectations. Now let's review our segment performance. Prepared Foods delivered a strong quarter with sales up 8.1% versus last year. Growth was driven by volume, channel mix, and pass-through pricing. Segment operating income was $338 million, up $16 million versus prior year, reflecting continued progress on our multi-year plan to enhance profitability in this business. We see more ahead. Our fill rates in Prepared Foods remain solid but with room to improve, reflecting the improved S&OP process and unlocking efficiencies in our plants and distribution systems.

Our retail businesses outpaced the category in volume, dollars, and units, leading to share growth in all three measures. This has enabled us to better serve our strategic customers with greater consistency and reliability. The progress achieved in the quarter was expected and has laid the groundwork for an exciting 2026. Growth in Prepared Foods is important to us as it grows our customers' business, expands the reach of our brands, and utilizes a sizable portion of our raw material availability. We see significant opportunities ahead to drive growth and improve profits. Our conviction in this multi-year opportunity to expand profitability in Prepared Foods remains strong.

Our Chicken segment delivered a strong first quarter in line with the prior year, with a significantly more challenging operating backdrop demonstrating the resilience of our business model and disciplined execution. Demand for chicken remained strong. Our diversified pricing strategies and product mix kept average selling price steady, offsetting declines in commodity prices and disruptions from the temporary government shutdown.

The efforts helped us overcome market volatility and achieve 3.6% year-over-year sales growth driven entirely by volume and strong consumer demand for chicken. This marks our fifth consecutive quarter of year-over-year volume and net sales gains, underscoring sustained demand for chicken and continued momentum of our strategic customer partnerships. While the retail channel saw strong growth across fresh and value-added products, resulting in growth across nearly all retail subchannels, we also saw strength in our food service business, led by solid results with QSR and distribution customers as consumers increasingly opt for value-oriented protein choices.

Segment operating income for the chicken segment reached $459 million, driven by improvements in live performance along with strong volume expansion and continued operational excellence. These factors enabled the chicken segment to deliver consistent operating income, further validating our confidence in the long-term durability and resilience of our business model.

In our Beef segment, we remain focused on the factors within our control as we navigate a challenging and dynamic market environment. Beef sales increased, reflecting continued healthy consumer demand. As Donnie mentioned in his remarks, we announced changes to right-size our beef business. These moves were completed after the close of our first quarter. Both moves are in response to the ongoing challenges of a tighter US cattle supply, and we believe these moves align us to compete more effectively this year and over the long term with a smaller production footprint and a higher capacity utilization. We expect to benefit in coming quarters from the effect of the actions taken. Segment Operating Income declined compared to the prior year as higher cattle costs more than offset higher cutout values and continued high consumer demand.

While navigating the headwinds, we remain committed to the elements we can control, like optimizing our operational footprint as well as seeking out alternatives to improve our long-term results. In pork, segment operating income margin increased 220 basis points to 6.7%, fueled by network optimization and operational efficiencies. Hog supplies were adequate during the quarter, and projections for an ample supply appear favorable for the upcoming year. The accessibility of pork raw material for our Prepared Foods division is a key part of our end-to-end pork strategy. We have made substantial progress in utilizing raw materials like pork bellies to supply our branded bacon, hams to supply lunchmeat, and trimmings to supply sausage. We will continue to push for higher utilization as it will improve access, quality, and landing costs for our raw materials.

Overall, I am encouraged by the incremental steps we have taken in the first quarter, and I'm confident that we have room to grow and improve across the operational and controllable aspects of our business in 2026 and beyond. We are focusing on our strategic customers and consumers while delivering value to our shareholders. With protein remaining a clear winner in the mind of consumers, the diversity of our portfolio enables us to make investments by partnering with our strategic customers to drive category expansion. With that, I will turn it over to Curt to walk through our financial results and outlook in more detail.

Thanks, Devin. As mentioned earlier, our first quarter results reflect a change in financial metrics, as we are now referring to segment operating income, which excludes corporate expenses and amortization at the segment level. For comparative purposes, all historical results and comparisons presented have been updated to reflect this change. As Donnie mentioned, the reason for this important change is to report results in the same manner that our decision-maker utilizes to assess business performance and allocate resources. We believe this provides investors with an increased level of transparency, and it enables them to better compare our results to other food producers. For the first quarter, total company sales grew 6.2% to $14.3 billion compared to prior year, led by Beef with solid contributions from Prepared Foods, Chicken, and Pork, reflecting the healthy demand environment for protein.

For comparative purposes, the sales increase was calculated excluding the effect of a $150 million legal contingency reserve that was recognized in the quarter. First quarter segment operating income was $811 million, down 12% compared to prior year, driven primarily by the decline in our beef segment, partially offset by growth in our other businesses. Additionally, corporate expenses and amortization were lower by $20 million, or 7.7%, as compared to the same period last year. Adjusted earnings per share for the quarter were $0.97, down 15% compared to last year, some of which was driven by a higher tax rate.

Our multi-protein, multi-channel portfolio, combined with our team's focus on operational execution in a dynamic macro environment, performed well compared to the overall food industry during the quarter. Turning to our financial position, our approach to capital allocation remains disciplined, deliberate, and forward-looking, and we have a strong balance sheet.

We are focused on maintaining financial strength, investing in the business, and returning cash to shareholders. Free cash flow is critical to us, and I am pleased with how cash trended in Q1. First quarter operating cash flow was $942 million, and capital expenditures were $252 million, resulting in free cash flow of just under $700 million, well ahead of dividends for the quarter, which were $177 million. We ended the quarter with $4.5 billion in liquidity, and net leverage declined to 2.0 times, an improvement of a tenth of a turn since year-end. If you step back and look at our balance sheet and leverage over the last few years, we've made immense progress strengthening our foundation. In fact, we have reduced gross debt by $1.4 billion over just the last 12 months.

With leverage continuing to decline and cash flows remaining strong, we continued share repurchases of $47 million during the quarter, and we returned $224 million to shareholders through accommodation of dividends and repurchases. Our balance sheet remains healthy as we prioritize financial strength, our investment-grade credit rating, and cash management to drive long-term shareholder value. Let's take a moment to review our outlook for 2026. As a reminder, our accounting cycle results in a 53-week year in fiscal 2026 as compared to a 52-week year in 2025. The 2026 outlook is based on a comparative 52-week year. We still anticipate full-year sales to be up 2%-4% year-over-year. We expect the range for total company Adjusted Operating Income to be between $2.1-$2.3 billion. We anticipate interest expense of approximately $370 million and a tax rate of around 25%.

We remain disciplined in managing cash, with CapEx expected to be $700 million to $1 billion, and free cash flow in the range of $1.1-$1.7 billion. The improved outlook in free cash flow is mostly associated with expected improvements in working capital compared to our prior outlook. Now, to provide more color on our segment outlook. Based on the continuation of a tight cattle supply, we expect Segment Operating Income in Beef to be a loss of $500 million-$250 million. The Beef outlook does not include costs related to facility closures. We anticipate Segment Operating Income for Pork to be $250 million-$300 million based on an adequate supply of hogs, continued productivity and operational improvements, and robust consumer demand for pork. We anticipate our Segment Operating Income for Chicken to be $1.65 million to $1.9 billion.

We believe chicken will be a preferred protein in the upcoming year. We also expect our operational execution and performance to continue to perform at a high level. In Prepared Foods, we expect Segment Operating Income to be $1.25 million-$1.35 billion. We expect a continuation of improved performance this year because of ongoing operational discipline and strategic investments in our categories. Our International segment performed well last year by managing controllable costs, maximizing efficiencies, and lowering conversion costs. We expect a continuation of these metrics in 2026, and Segment Operating Income in International to be $150 million-$200 million.

Corporate expenses and amortization are anticipated to be $950 million-$975 million. These results align with total company Adjusted Operating Income range of $2.1 million to $2.3 billion. Overall, I'm pleased with the first quarter's performance and confident that 2026 will be another strong year for our company. That covers our segment performance, financial highlights, and outlook for 2026. Now, I will turn the call over to Donnie.

Thanks, Curt. In the first quarter, our team successfully navigated a dynamic and challenging market landscape. These achievements are a direct result of our collective dedication, and we look forward to building on this momentum as we move further into 2026. I want to extend my deepest gratitude to every team member at Tyson Foods. It is your passion, dedication, and unwavering commitment to our purpose that makes me most excited about our future.

Together, we have the unique responsibility and privilege to feed the world like family by providing high-quality protein that not only tastes good but is nutritious, affordable, and convenient. Our purpose is about more than providing food. By providing protein, we have the ability to support good health. This shared purpose is what drives us forward and is the foundation of the future we're building together. With that, I'll turn things back over to John as we begin the Q&A session.

We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star, then one on your touch-tone phone. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your question, please press star and then two. Please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. If you have further questions, you may reenter the question queue. The first question comes from Ben Theurer with Barclays. Please go ahead.

Yeah, good morning, and thank you very much for taking my question. Donnie, Devin, Curt, congrats on a good first quarter. First question, I'd like to kick it off. Obviously, the change in some of that segment reporting versus adjusted reporting, maybe if you could explain us a little bit more the rationale behind that and the management incentives on a per-business level, and if there's any relationship from that into what the free cash flow change is. You've briefly mentioned working capital, so maybe there is something connected here. So I would like to understand the rationale behind how to manage the business and what's ultimately then driving that free cash flow revision. That would be my question. Thank you very much.

Thanks for the question, Ben, and good morning. Great question. And so let me start with the change was very intentional. It was on purpose. And let me back up a little bit and give you some of the rationale for why I wanted it changed. And so let's start with if you go back a number of quarters ago, we talked about the fact that we were going to turn over every rock in this organization to be the best in class in terms of food companies. And we've been doing those things. There are a lot of proof points relative to that. One of the issues that we've had, and particularly over the last couple of years as it relates to beef, is volume. So very simply, this.

I needed the organization to grow this business, to grow volume in this business, grow it in our branded and value-added, increase household penetration with consumers. And in order to do that, I kept bumping up against the fact that people would say things like, "This corporate overhead structure is I'm uncompetitive in the marketplace. I'm all these different things." And so here's the math very simply behind that and why we did this is this is how we run the business. But before we make the first sale every week, before we turn on the first machine at Tyson Foods every week, we're sitting with something on the order of $1 billion of amortization and corporate expenses. Now, corporate expenses make up about 80% of that, amortization about 20%. It is largely fixed in nature.

So therefore, we start every week with about $20 million of fixed costs before we sell the first pound, produce the first pound. Very simply, I wanted to move that barrier to our organization in terms of trying to sell and grow our business, and particularly in light of the fact that there is less beef production at the same time. We're employing an ROIC mentality, but it has energized our organization. In fact, if you look at where we are at this point, we're down 8%, and we're just announcing it to you. It gave me visibility that I needed. It gave those business leaders across the organization and function leaders to be able to see through an activity-based process where we could manage our business better.

Very simply, it was a matter of looking at things and saying, "Does the shareholder want to pay for this? Does a customer want to pay for this? Are they willing to pay for it? Is a consumer willing to pay for this?" All of those type things led into this decision. Now, just changing from AOI to Segment Operating Income doesn't change anything. What we did was expose what those corporate expenses are, and at the same time, we worked on some of those that are embedded in the cost structure and in businesses as well. It was to simplify how we look at the business and be a catalyst for us growing the business. Curt, let me see if you want to add anything to that too.

Yeah, thanks, Donnie. And Ben, great question. I think about the change today as more the journey where we've been the last couple of years. We intentionally moved away from a return on sales percentage of a business a couple of years ago and really focused on dollar contribution of each of our businesses. We did that in certainly how we talk, but also how we provide guidance to you. While not as apparent, but Donnie mentioned it, we've over the last couple of years also had a very renewed internal metric and focus on return on invested capital. Today's change, as we're sharing with you, and we've changed internally this past quarter as well, is very intentional in setting us up to be very focused from a growth standpoint and a clarity standpoint. Hopefully, that gives you a little bit of intel.

But I think the other part of your question was around improved free cash flow and perhaps whether that was included in or changed as we think about the relative segments. So let me maybe just back up a second and talk about guidance overall and what changed and what didn't change. And let me just start with clarifying what did not change. So we did not change total company adjusted operating income, which was still $2.1 billion-$2.3 billion. Sales growth still positive, up 2%-4%. And CapEx stayed constant at $700 million-$1 billion, and then adjusted tax rate still at approximately 25%. None of those changed. As you pointed out, we did change free cash flow and actually improved it, now a range of $1.1 billion-$1.7 billion.

You're right, the working capital performance is a driver of that better than we had previously included in our prior forecast for free cash flow. That also aided in reducing interest expense. Interest expense now on a net basis at $370 million, partially from that improved free cash flow, partially from capital structure efficiencies that we put in place. The other change that you highlighted certainly was a new type of guidance at the segment operating income level. Prepared Foods, $1.25 billion-$1.35 billion, still a range of $100 million. Chicken, $1.65 billion-$1.9 billion, still a range of about $250 million. International, $150 million-$200 million, still a range of $50 million. Pork, we did narrow the range to $250 million-$300 million, really following a good Q1 performance, but also the seasonality, usually a little bit better Q1 for us.

Beef losses, $500 million-$250 million, so widened the range a little bit. Certainly, in light of a very dynamic beef environment, we widened that loss range a little bit. Then new corporate expenses and amortization, a range of $950 million-$750 million. But I'd just finish with Q1 was very much in line with our expectations. From a total outlook, still a range of adjusted operating income at $2.1 million to $2.3 billion.

Okay, perfect. Then a quick follow-up on Prepared Foods. You've flagged a very strong pricing increase over last year with essentially flattish volumes, but it seems the profit margin is still somewhat under pressure. Can you help us understand where you are in the journey of price increases of some of the input cost inflation that you've been facing, particularly from beef that goes into Prepared Foods? How much more of price increases do you need to push through, and what magnitude would that be to get a more stable profit margin versus last year?

Sure. Sure. I'll take that one. Let me start with, Ben. Our multi-year strategy is working. Our business is growing, which will create long-term value for the company. Our net sales were up about 8%. Let me touch on that here. The 8% increase was not pure price. The increase reflected a combination of channel mix and formula-based pass-through pricing. A large portion of the food service business is formula-priced, and as raw materials go up, finished goods pricing follows.

There's, of course, a lag with that. The current state, as you think about commodities, and we talked about this last quarter, our commodity cost in this quarter is up $100 million. But I would tell you that pricing is catching up, which is you're seeing it in sales price. Beef and pork trim remains elevated, and other inputs are stabilizing. It's predominantly a food service driving. But I have to point out this in terms of growth in our Prepared Foods business. We grew market share. We grew volume, dollars, and unit share. And this is the fifth consecutive quarter of sequential improvement. But the pricing is not pure pricing. It's our pricing, particularly in food service, catching up with those increase in raw materials.

Got it. Thank you very much. I'll pass it on.

The next question comes from Leah Jordan with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning and great job on a nice quarter. I understand protein demand is really elevated right now, which is helpful for you. But what's really great to see is your branded portfolio across Prepared and Fresh continue to take share. Just what do you think you're doing differently to position your brands today? Why do you think they're resonating in the current environment, especially when the consumer backdrop hasn't mixed? And maybe how much do you think innovation has been a driving factor as well?

Sure, Leah. Good morning, and thank you for the question. Let me start out with a punchline. Thank you for recognizing that. But there's a number of things. Let's start with protein. Protein is a superstar in the story. The execution of the businesses, which, yeah, you can think about it in terms of the traditional labor, yield, spend, those kind of things. But in terms of using tools in the market that we have available to us that we haven't had before, we see a number of things. For example, we're expanding our core distribution. With our customers, our strategic customers that we talk about across all segments, we're doing that with them. We're accelerating innovation, and we continue to invest in MAP. And so those are the levers that we're using.

So I would give you this statistic, which I'm very proud of from an organizational perspective, acknowledging that there's still plenty to do. Tyson was the only food company in consumer staples growing volume and dollar share in the most recent report. The only other one was P&G, which is not in the food space. So I'm very proud of that. Our machine is working, but it's largely execution from one end of the supply chain to the other. And let me pass it on to Kristina Lambert and let her add a little more finer points to this.

Yeah, thanks, Donnie. I think you started out earlier really well talking about our commitment to growing the volume within our businesses. And what you're seeing across our brands is that continued effort to increase household penetration, focusing on younger consumers, meeting their needs in unique ways, whether it be renovation of our existing core items or innovating into new spaces to meet those unmet consumer needs. Donnie also talked about the expanded distribution. We've been able to increase distribution across our Tyson, Jimmy Dean, Hillshire Farm, Ball Park, all driven by that commitment with our strategic customers and our intent to grow our business and their business at the same time.

With the new dietary guidelines emphasizing protein, we're really excited about the opportunity for having three of the top 10 brands within the food segment for the US. So Tyson, Jimmy Dean, and Hillshire Farm. We are outpacing most of the channels and those strategic customers, again, in retail and food service. Our portfolio will allow us to meet continued needs as we go on this journey to provide food that tastes good. It's made with ingredients that consumers can find in their own pantries. It'll be nutritious, affordable, and convenient. And those are our commitments. We're really excited about the opportunity for Tyson Foods.

Thank you. That's very helpful. Just switching over to beef, given the wider guidance range there, just more color on the trends you're seeing in that segment. Any puts and takes on the potential impact from your recent capacity closures as we think about the next few quarters? I think I heard in the prepared remarks that it wasn't reflected fully in the updated guide. Just how are you thinking about capacity for the overall industry as we go forward? Thank you.

Yeah, good morning. This is Devin. We continue to be in a very dynamic and volatile situation with the beef segment, as has been mentioned. In the quarter, there are really four key drivers that affect the results in this business. We certainly have cattle cost, which we've talked a good bit about historically and continued to be a challenge just due to the general cattle availability. But also, we have cutout. We have the drop credit and the manufacturing cost structure. There's really a balance for us between all of those factors. And in this quarter, we did experience, as I mentioned, the higher cattle cost. We also had additional freight impacts as we worked to fill the production needs within the regional supply deficits that we saw.

Certainly, from quarter to quarter, we can and will have differences in basis derivatives that we use to risk manage the business. What I'm proud of as a team, despite some very difficult circumstances, is that we are performing well with the metrics we can control. We had heavier weights that did negatively affect cutout values due to body compositions, but they also help us with our volume. Overall, the volume was slightly down. It was down 7.3% in the quarter despite these heavier weights. There's pluses and minuses with those factors as well. Really, all of these weighed into our decision to make changes to the production footprint. We just recently completed these, so that would not be anything that would be in the Q1 reporting relative to what we expect to see moving forward.

I think if you think about the future of this, it's important to point out that the data that we see indicates an ultimate smaller herd as it does rebuild, which has been historically true for the last several cycles. The strategic steps we've taken to put us in the best possible position to maximize capacity utilization, and it allows us to increase our efficiencies, reduce our costs, and capture value from improved yields. Really, as in all of the businesses, as we've talked about, our objective is to be the most efficient and best-performing company. So we're not only focused on the operational excellence but continue to work with strategic customers and supply partners to make sure we're optimizing the mix and find innovative ways to add value and convenience for consumers.

I think as well, just one clarification in the question. As Devin had pointed out right, the announcement of that was obviously in Q1. The activities didn't occur until our second quarter. The comments in the prepared remarks also reference that our outlook would not include the cost associated with all that closure, obviously, because that is adjusted out as we did in Q1 as well.

The next question comes from Tom Palmer with J.P. Morgan. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Thanks for the question. Donnie, I was curious about your updated views of the chicken industry. Your tone in recent quarters, I think, has been very constructive about supply growth being limited. Though in today's prepared remarks, you also referenced a weaker chicken environment in the quarter, and the annual outlook was reiterated. So maybe just an update on kind of how you're seeing the market environment. Thanks.

Sure. And thanks for the question. Let me start with the end here and just tell you that, once again, we think that 2026 will be similar to what we saw in 2025. And so that's what we have modeled. But in terms of supply, just from an industry perspective, USDA projects a 1% growth in production. We think it's very manageable. You saw some recent excess increases, and we think that's also manageable. But the other part of that equation, the demand side of that, demand continues to be strong. And our supply at Tyson, we're in very good balance. I think the industry is in very good balance based on publicly available data. So we're very excited about that. But for Tyson, we think it's a constructive environment.

But our confidence in last quarter, this quarter, is based on the execution that we have in this business. For example, we did experience some commodity softness in the quarter. In fact, we talked about a little bit earlier about in 2025, you saw some record recipe prices. I would expect, and we've seen, that it's possible there will be some market normalization throughout 2026. There is. You saw in December, prices moved down on some of the commodities, and they're back up more recently. I just call this typical seasonality. I'm not concerned about that. I think I would also point out, and we have in the past, that at Tyson, we are not tied directly to commodity markets. So that's also another point that you should be aware of. We feel very good about it.

It's based on our execution and every one of our from hatch, livability, customer relationships. But the secret sauce, if you will, around the Tyson model is that we continue to grow volume, and we continue to be aligned with strategic customers. The execution with those customers in quality, service, consistency, those type things is paying huge dividends. It's what we've been working on now for some time. You see the evidence of that in our volume being up 3.8%. In fact, our volume in Q1 for poultry is an all-time record in terms of volume. But we saw it in places where we told you we wanted to see it. For example, our branded fresh business is up 9%, and our branded frozen is up 12.2%. Very nice job.

The other part of that, and it gets back to your question, our net sales were up 3.6%. That's largely mixed. But our actual pricing remained flat versus the prior year. And so I'll stop or take a pause right there and see if you have a follow-up to that.

Thanks. That was really helpful, Calaway. Maybe just pivot a little bit. Now that we're seeing the corporate amortization for the first time, I guess, guidance would imply it's down at least 4% year-over-year, I think. What's driving that decrease?

Or your question's on amortization down year-over-year, Tom?

Sorry, the corporate plus amortization line, kind of the newly introduced line, I think guidance implies it's down at least 4% year-over-year.

Yeah. Yeah. I think acknowledging that in the first quarter, right, we were down $20 million on a year-over-year basis. That really is driven by our focus from an overhead cost that we disclosed in the 10-Q as well, that team member costs were down about $13 million versus the prior quarter. There will be a little bit of reduction as well in amortization on a year-over-year basis, but the largest contributor to that would just be team member-related costs.

The next question comes from Alexia Howard with Bernstein. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Can I ask about an update on heifer retention and any signals that you're seeing out in the marketplace about how that's playing out? I think last quarter, you talked about how in certain regions, we start to be seeing some heifer retention and the beginnings of the resolution of a beef cycle. Is that still the case, and are you seeing it expanding?

Yeah. Good morning. The USDA did release their annual report on Friday. And I think a few points to note in there. It is the smallest herd since 1951, but maybe more important to today's world. It's 9% lower than it was in 2019. So cattle availability continues to be the issue for the industry. However, I would say that we do continue to see some signs, early signs of a rebuild. Replacement heifers in that report did increase 1%. And there's some regionality in that, not a surprise, similar to what we've been seeing. I think as we get through the winter months and into the spring, that will become more clear if that stays on course. But also, I would tell you, beef cow slaughter was down 17.7% in 2025.

So that's well below the historical average. And heifers on feed also down 3.1% from the prior year. So again, there are some bright spots in there as we begin to see these early signs of a herd rebuild. But bear in mind, too, as that happens, those cattle will be taken out of the supply chain, and we'll go through a period where we will have less availability in the short term as we build back this herd. I think the summary for all of those data points for us is that cattle are going to remain extremely tight for the foreseeable future.

And we are in these early stages. I think coming out the other side, as I mentioned, this herd will be smaller than historical numbers post-cycle, which would be indicative of recent times. Whenever we've gone through rebuild cycles, they do come out with a lower overall number. As a result, feedlots are having to hold cattle longer.

Certainly, with stable grain inputs, they're maximizing their weight, which is just helpful from a volume standpoint to a point. As I mentioned earlier, we do have some body composition issues as they become certainly really large. But I think in all of this, the point, too, is demand remains very robust. USDA indicates that their forecast in 2026 will be very similar to what consumption was in 2022. So no changes throughout all of this. But to me, really, what it does is emphasizes why we've made the decisions to make the changes in our harvest footprint and really setting ourselves up for future based on the data that we can see today.

Thank you. And then as a follow-up, have you quantified how much the net savings are from the beef plant closure and the shift reduction? Just trying to figure out how that affects the profitability of that segment going forward.

Yeah. I think I'd just point you to the guidance that we have for the year. We have baked into that everything that we are able to quantify today. It is early. We just recently completed this transition into our new footprint. We do intend to not only increase our capacity utilization but continue with all of the operational benchmarks and improvements that we see. Ultimately, we intend to run a best-in-class operation. But I don't have any other specific numbers to give you.

The next question comes from Pooran Sharma with Stephens. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Thanks for the question. Congrats on the results here. Just wanted to maybe start off with Beef here and just trying to get a little bit more color around guidance and cadence, really. I think midpoint of 375 signifies some sort of kind of improvement from here. You've kind of spelled it out a little bit saying you're going to get some benefits from the facility closure. But I was wondering if you could help us kind of think about the margin aspect. I think beef packer margins are trending slightly worse right now than they were in 4Q. And was just wondering if you guys are seeing the same thing.

And then in terms of the cadence, do you expect kind of just sequential improvements from here? Do you expect a step-up improvement next quarter because of the facility costs and then kind of normal seasonality? Or how should we think about cadence overall?

I'll start, and Devin may have something to add here. I would certainly remind you, as you had kind of highlighted, there is always generally a little bit of seasonality in the beef business with our second quarter usually having challenges, not the least of which would be weather-related. But a range as we've widened it out $50 million, at a loss of $500 million-$250 million. I think acknowledging our Q2 challenge and perhaps what would seasonally be a little bit better in the back half of the year as you get into grilling season. But certainly, animal availability is going to be a key determinant of that. And I'll let Devin add anything else he wants.

Yeah. No, I think that's really it. I mean, you can certainly see our results in Q1. And many of those issues that I mentioned previously were the drivers in that as we had regional disparity and had to move some cattle around. Q2, as Curt mentioned, will always have its fair share of challenges. But again, this is really why we've done what we've done to put ourselves not only in the back half of the year but looking out beyond that to be in the best possible position for success with the cattle that are available to us. So again, we don't guide quarterly, but certainly, you can put those building blocks together.

Absolutely. I appreciate the color. And maybe just for the follow-up, wanted to ask about prepared foods. I think in the past, you've noted that there's a little bit more seasonality in the first half of the year. But we've had some challenges with input costs in the past few quarters. So I was just wondering if as we look out into this business, do you expect to see a more even pace throughout the year? Or how should we think about seasonality in prepared foods?

Yeah. Thanks, Pooran. You're correct. Last year, we pointed to a more balanced front half, back half. And that was really driven by the building effect of our operational execution inside the walls of the plant that were really giving us some benefit that kind of tilted the axis a bit, if you will. I think on balance, we said that that would probably start to revert back to a bit more normalized level. I think the only other data point, and you kind of alluded to it, was we did make the comment a quarter ago that some of the run-up in raw material costs didn't fully get flushed through the P&L in Q4. We still carried some of that in inventory.

The inventory we sold out or COGS, if you will, at the beginning part of the quarter, which may have altered a little bit, a little closer to 50/50. But it's a mix of those, right? I would say generally, it's a little bit more front half loaded. But we did, again, carry some higher inventory into this Q1.

The next question comes from Peter Galbo with Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning, guys. Thanks for the questions. Curt, maybe just a housekeeping to go back to Ben Theurer's initial question. So understanding, right, no change at the consolidated sales or operating income line. And I think you talked about maybe some flex within pork and beef, but the range is remaining relatively unchanged. So should we be viewing this as X, the accounting changes were announced today, none of the segment dollar ranges really would have changed aside from maybe a little bit of tweaking at the top and bottom end just so that we're comparing kind of an apples-to-apples basis?

Yeah, that's reasonable. I think, as we said, 1-2.3 in total doesn't change. And hopefully, my clarity around free cash flow and the reasons why helped understand the additional components to that. But overall, right, our message is Q1 performed in line with our expectation. And on the full year, we see the year we see it similar as we did in November. So I think it's a reasonable push, a reasonable thesis you have. And I should have added earlier, but hopefully, it's helpful if you haven't seen it yet. We did also file an 8-K this morning with the recast historicals for 2023, 2024, and 2025 by quarter, by segment. So you can see each of those changes. And it's available on our IR website as well. Hopefully, that gives you some really good clarity and ability to update models as well.

Yeah. Maybe I add one thing to that, Pete. And it's this. It's the obvious. But as we separated the corporate expense and amortization, we obviously intend to manage that more closely than we have in the past. So you should expect greater efficiency and greater leverage against that, what we have termed largely being fixed in nature. The other piece of that is you should see us growing volume across all of the businesses in all the right places in order to fill capacities. So the outcome of this will be more volume, greater capacity utilization, which results in a better cost structure overall in terms of the controllable or plant cost, for example.

Got it. Okay. No, thank you, guys, for that. That's very clear. As a follow-up, if I could just ask kind of on chicken, a lot of that again, a lot of that accounting change, I think, kind of footed out of that segment both from a corporate and an amortization standpoint. But historically, there's been a fair amount of seasonality in the chicken business, particularly into the second quarter. Just does anything change regarding that? Is it more accentuated now because there's other costs that have moved out? Or just any kind of nuance we should think about in chicken as it relates to 2Q specifically? Thanks very much.

Sure. Thank you for the question. I would tell you across all businesses, I mean, we're off to a good start in Q2 and very much in line with our guidance and our internal expectations. I'll start with that. You'll see normal seasonality, which I referenced earlier as being typical. I think you'll continue to see that. I don't know. I can't tell you at this point what breast meat prices, for example, will do. What I can tell you is we are as I said earlier, we are not immune, but we're less influenced by commodity markets. Essentially, the biggest part of that is because of our strategic customer relationships. At the same time, it's the makeup of our portfolio, particularly those things in the Tyson brand. That obviously gives us an advantage. It gives us more consistency.

Frankly, as a company across all businesses, the highs and lows of markets, whether it be inputs or finished goods in commodity market, we're looking for consistency. That provides a much more stable operating environment.

Tyson Foods (TSN) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Company Participants