See which workplaces made this year's list.

Employees say:"For a national public company and high up in the homebuilder industry, the overall culture both nationally and divisionally does not feel very corporate. &nbsp;Working here feels more like family, and surrounded by a big bunch of relatives all over - near and far. &nbsp;Everyone is approachable. &nbsp;It is a positive corporate culture that is fostered by its leadership who are effective, supportive, empathetic, and approachable. &nbsp;Thank you for making every effort to provide clear communication, opportunities for growth, collaboration, reward systems, and a strong sense of purpose. &nbsp;It is great place to work and be a part of!"

Best Large Workplaces in Construction

This ranking evaluates how Fortune 500 companies are deploying AI, and how technology leaders value those investments relative to industry peers.

Fortune AIQ 75

With a combined revenue of $21 trillion and $2.1 trillion in profits, the 2026 Fortune 500 is the definitive list of America's largest companies.

Fortune 500

AI is a major force shaping this year’s list—but it’s far from the only story.

World's Most Admired Companies

The companies on this annual list make a conscious effort to be supportive, inclusive workplaces.

Employees say:"Toll Brothers is the best place of work I have ever had. I have developed the confidence and trust within myself to perform my duties well. Toll offers so many resources to be good at your job (training, senior employees with loads of knowledge and online tools). I don't even like using the term 'job'. I see this as a long-term career and with long-term success. It has challenged me in ways that I didn't know I had to grow in. I have learned so much. I interact with most all departments on a daily basis and I consider them all my work-family. When things get tough or something is missed, we communicate well to get it all resolved quickly and efficiently."

100 Best Large Workplaces for Women

Almost $20 trillion in revenue—and a record-breaking $1.87 trillion in profits. Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive list of the biggest companies in America.

Leaders in all industries rely more than ever on Big Tech—and appreciate the giants that deliver, at scale, without drama.

Industries included in the sector are construction and engineering services and homebuilders.

Fortune Sector Leaders: Engineering and Construction

The Fortune 500, in its 70th year in 2024, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

The 26th edition of the list shows how much esteem Big Tech giants command among other business leaders.

The 25th Fortune World’s Most Admired Companies list suggests that tech giants’ peers respect them as much as ever.

Employees say: 
 
"The overall camaraderie is unlike anywhere else I've worked. People who work here care about the work they do and the people they work with. I also love, as does my family, the additional time off we're given around holidays and the personal health days."

The Fortune 500, in its 69th year in 2023, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

Just as it dominates our economy, Big Tech now dominates Fortune’s annual ranking of corporate reputation.

Great Places to Work in Construction Large-2022-Toll Brothers, Inc._1000277-2

Employees say: 
 
“The culture of the company is inclusive and unique. Positions are considered valuable no matter what the department, the pay, or the responsibility. Everyone has a part in making it work and is appreciated for their particular role.”

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 68th running of the list.

After a year in which humanity leaned more heavily than ever on tech giants, see which companies topped Fortune's ranking of corporate reputation.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 67th running of the list.

New Residential Properties Ahead Of Housing Starts Figures

The company designs, builds, markets, sells, and arranges financing for luxury residential properties in 24 states.

For an astounding 13th straight year, Apple claims the top spot in Fortune’s annual ranking of corporate reputation, based on a survey of almost 3,800 executives, directors, and analysts.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 66th running of the list.

F500-2020-426-Toll-Brothers

Revenues at the luxury homebuilder were essentially flat last year, and earnings sank 21%. The main culprit: slowing demand in a key market, California. Its stock was down sharply in the first few months of 2020 on fears of a coronavirus-driven slump in home sales.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2019 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 65th running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2018 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 64th running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2017 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 63rd running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2016 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 62nd running of the list.

Business insiders have spoken: Asked which companies they most admire, more than 4,100 executives, directors, and analysts chose these top 50 All-Stars.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 61st running of the list. Wal-Mart claims the top spot again. See who made the list.

The inaugural list of the 100 Best Workplaces for Millennials from our partners at Great Place to Work includes surprising newcomer Power Home Remodeling, making an impressive debut at No. 1. Other standouts include Chili’s Grill and Bar (no. 11), Elevation Church (No. 34), and Yelp (No. 41).

BESTCOMPANIES2015TOLL BROTHERS

Luxury home builder Toll Brothers has built a high-quality home for its workforce. The company hosts free dinners on Monday and holds occasional fireside chats with CEO Douglas Yearley. Employees are allowed to rent—and vacation at —properties the company owns across the country for discounted prices. Plus, the company bagged the no. 628 spot on this year’s Fortune 1000 list. “You are given ample responsibilities and your success is pretty much in your hands,” says one worker. <a style="color:#ff0000;" href="http://us.greatrated.com/toll-brothers" target="_blank">Read the Great Place to Work review.</a>

100 Best Large Workplaces for Millennials

This year's Fastest-Growing Companies marks the 19th running of the list. In our annual list of public companies with the most stellar three-year profit, revenue, and stock growth, Facebook makes its first appearance.

100 Fastest-Growing Companies

Wal-Mart stayed on top as its sales crept closer to half-a-trillion dollars. Apple moved into the top five. And UnitedHealth Group continued its steady climb. 

Shale rules! That’s the lesson of the latest edition of our annual list of public companies with the most stellar three-year profit, revenue, and stock growth. 

Fastest-growing Companies

Headquarters

Industry

Sector

Fortune 500 Rank

Fortune 500 Profile

Current Streak

Years on List

Website

Revenue, Net Income

Revenue past four quarters ($M)

Net Income past four quarters ($M)

Growth Rates

EPS 3 Yr Annual Growth Rate

Revenue 3 Yr Annual Growth Rate

Total Return 3 Yr Annual Rate

Beat S&P 500 3 Yr Return

Rank

EPS 3 Yr Growth Rank

Revenue 3 Yr Growth Rank

Total Return 3 Yr Rank

Company Info

City

Founded

Type of org

Revenue ($)

Web Address

Global employee headcount

Millennials as % of total workforce

Best Workplaces For Women

Industry Vertical

# Work Sites

Current All-Star Rank

Previous All-Star Rank

Industry Rank

Previous Industry Rank

Overall Score

Innovation

People Management

Use of Corporate Assets

Social Responsibility

Quality of Management

Financial Soundness

Long-Term Investment Value

Quality of Products/Services

Global Competitiveness

Key Financials (last Fiscal Year)

Revenues ($M)

Profits ($M)

Assets ($M)

Total Stockholder Equity ($M)

Profit Ratios

Profit as % of Revenues

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholder Equity

Earnings Per Share (last Fiscal Year)

Earnings Per Share ($)

EPS % Change (from prior fiscal year)

EPS % Change (5 year annual rate)

EPS % Change (10 year annual rate)

Total Return

Total Return to Investors (last year)

Total Return to Investors (5 year, annualized)

Total Return to Investors (10 year, annualized)

Best Workplaces In Construction

Sites

Toll Brothers was founded in 1967 by brothers Robert and Bruce Toll in Pennsylvania as a builder of luxury homes. The company went public in 1986 and expanded nationwide, eventually moving into urban high-rises, active adult communities, and resort properties. Over the decades, Toll Brothers has grown into a leading U.S. builder of luxury homes, operating in 24 states and the District of Columbia. Today it designs, builds, and sells high-end homes, condominiums, and rental communities, and offers related services such as mortgage, insurance, and smart-home technology.

Q3 2026

Q2 2026

Q1 2026

Q4 2025

Q3 2025

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Toll Brothers (TOL): Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings

legacy

Toll Brothers

toll brothers

I would now like to turn the conference over to Douglas Yearley, CEO. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Rocco. Good morning. Welcome, and thank you for joining us. With me today are Gregg Ziegler, Chief Financial Officer, Rob Parahus, President and Chief Operating Officer, Wendy Marlett, Chief Marketing Officer, and Karl Mistry, who will be taking over as the third CEO in our company's history on March 30, when I will transition to the executive chairman role. Karl is an outstanding leader who has been with Toll Brothers for over 20 years. He has run home building operations in many of our key markets and currently heads all of our eastern operations. He knows this company inside and out, and I'm very confident he is the right person to lead us through the next phase of growth. During today's call, I will provide a brief overview of our results in the quarter, discuss the market at the macro level, and touch on our strategic initiatives.

Karl will focus on our operational results and provide a deeper dive on conditions across our markets and product lines. As usual, Gregg will provide a detailed review of our financial results in the quarter and discuss guidance for the balance of the year. Before we start, however, I need to provide the usual cautionary notice that many statements on this call are forward-looking, based on assumptions about the economy, world events, housing and financial markets, interest rates, the availability of labor and materials, inflation, and many other factors beyond our control that could significantly affect future results. Please read our statement on forward-looking information in our earnings release of last night and on our website to better understand the risks associated with our forward-looking statements. I am pleased with our Q1 results as we met or exceeded guidance across nearly all metrics.

We delivered 1,899 homes in the quarter and generated $1.85 billion of home building revenue, approximately $24 million above the midpoint of our guidance. Both our adjusted gross margin and SG&A margin were also better than guidance by 25 points and 30 points, respectively. We earned $2.19 per diluted share, a 25% increase compared to the $1.75 we earned in last year's Q1, and 5 cents above our implied guidance. We are off to a good start in fiscal 2026. In the quarter, we signed 2,303 net contracts for $2.4 billion, flat in units, but up 3% in dollars compared to last year's Q1, as the average sales price increased to $1,033,000.

Since mid-January, we have seen an increase in overall traffic and sales consistent with the start of the spring selling season. While it is early, we are cautiously encouraged by the increase in activity over the past month. Our strategy of balancing price and pace worked well in the Q1. Our overall incentive remained flat compared to the Q4 at 8% of sales price. This is the third consecutive quarter that incentives remained flat on a percentage basis. We are benefiting from a healthy mix of build-to-order and spec homes in our inventory, balancing the higher margin in our build-to-order business with the lower margin, but faster turns in our spec business. Impressively, our average adjusted gross margin in our build-to-order business remained above 30% in the Q1.

Overall, as we head into the heart of the spring selling season, we are very comfortable with the level of specs in our inventory and their stage of construction. Consistent with the strategy I discussed during our last call, we increased our spec production in our Q1 in order to have the right amount available for delivery in the summer, when many buyers are looking to move into their new homes ahead of the start of the school year. We expect to increase community count in the Q2 from 445 communities at the end of the Q1 to 455 at the end of the second. For the full year, we are targeting another 8%-10% increase over the 9% we grew last year.

We also have enough land under control to continue growing community count at this pace over the next several years. At Q1 end, we owned or controlled approximately 75,000 lots, 55% of which were optioned. Our land is well located in desirable locations, which allows us to be highly selective and disciplined as we evaluate new land opportunities. We also continue to structure land acquisition and development opportunities to be more capital efficient, including through option arrangements, land banks, joint ventures, and similar structures that allow us to defer payments and lot takedowns. I'd also point out that we continue to benefit from our more affluent customer base, which is less sensitive to the affordability pressures that continue to impact the entry-level buyer.

Over 70% of our business is luxury move-up and luxury move-down, which serves a wealthy cohort that has benefited from growth in their home equity and stock market appreciation. The remaining 25%-30% serves the more affluent, first-time buyer who is less impacted by affordability pressures. Many of them are older millennials buying their first home later in life when they have higher incomes and are more financially secure. The average delivered price of our first-time buyer was approximately $670,000 in our Q1. Lastly, I will note that our balance sheet remains very healthy. We have ample liquidity, low net debt, and a strong investment-grade credit rating. We recently extended the maturities of our revolving credit facility and most of our term loan facility to February 2031. We also continue to expect significant cash flow generation from operations this year.

All of this enables us to continue investing in the growth of our business while also returning capital to our stockholders. With that, I will turn it over to Karl.

Thank you, Doug. I'm excited for this opportunity and grateful for the trust that you and the board have placed in me. I very much appreciate our investors and the analyst community, and I look forward to building on the great relationships that you and Bob, before you, have developed over the years. We started the year off with a solid Q1. We beat the midpoint for our homebuilding revenue guidance, exceeded margin expectations, and increased our earnings per share by 25% over last year's Q1. From a demand perspective, we saw the typical seasonal pattern unfold in the Q1. Based on signed contracts on both an absolute and per-community basis, November was the slowest month, followed by December, with a market uptick in January.

As Doug mentioned, we saw an increase in demand beginning in mid-January that is consistent with the start of the spring selling season. With our broadly diversified portfolio and affluent buyer profile, we are well-positioned to capitalize on any further improvement in homebuyer demand. Geographically, the Boston to South Carolina corridor has continued to perform well, as has Boise, Las Vegas, and Reno in our Mountain region, and all of California. Most of Florida seems to have found its footing, although Tampa remains challenged, along with Atlanta, San Antonio, and the Pacific Northwest. Among our buyer segments, our luxury move-up business also continued to perform well. In the Q1, luxury move-up accounted for 59% of homebuilding revenues. Luxury first time was 25%, and luxury move down was 16%.

Our luxury move-up business has the highest margin among our buyer segments, so we are very pleased that it is the largest part of our business. Turning now from buyer segments to our build-to-order and spec home strategy, I will note that we generate about one-half of our homebuilding revenues from specs and the other half from build-to-order. We believe we have achieved the right balance in our overall business with this healthy 50/50 mix of high-margin build-to-order homes, with buyers who want to customize their dream home with specific layouts, designs, and finishes, alongside lower margin, but faster-turning spec homes that appeal to buyers who want to move into their homes on a quicker schedule. I will also point out that we sell our specs at various stages of construction, although the mix can change from quarter to quarter.

On average, approximately one-third of our specs sell before framing is completed, and the risk profile and margin for these homes is not all that different from our build-to-order homes. Our goal is to sell our specs as early in the construction cycle as possible. The earlier we sell our specs, the greater the opportunity for our customers to visit our design studio and personalize their homes with finishes that match their tastes. This ability to customize remains an important competitive advantage for Toll Brothers, and it benefits our margins, as design studio upgrades tend to be highly accretive. In the Q1, design studio upgrades, structural options, and lot premiums averaged $212,000, or 25% of our average base sales price. Doug mentioned the benefits of serving a more affluent customer base.

Consistent with the past several quarters, approximately 24% of our buyers paid all cash in the Q1, and the loan-to-value for buyers who took a mortgage was approximately 70%, also consistent with recent quarters. Our contract cancellation rate in the Q1 remained low at 2.8% of beginning backlog. This industry-low cancellation rate speaks to the financial strength of our buyers, as well as the sizable deposits they make and how emotionally invested they become as they personalize their homes at our design studios. We benefited from improved production efficiencies in our construction cycle times in the Q1. For our build-to-order homes, the cycle time was approximately 9.5 months and was about one month shorter for spec homes. Additionally, our build costs in the Q1 were flat compared to the Q4 of 2025.

Thanks, Karl. In the Q1, we delivered 1,899 homes at an average price of-

... of $977,000 and generated home sales revenues of $1.85 billion. While we exceeded the midpoint of our revenue guidance, the average delivered price was below our guidance, due primarily to mix, as we delivered more lower-priced finished spec homes in the quarter than projected. As Doug mentioned, we signed 2,303 net agreements for $2.4 billion in the quarter, flat in units, but up 3% in dollars compared to the Q1 of fiscal 2025. The average price of contracts signed in the quarter was approximately $1,033,000, which was up 3% compared to the Q1 of fiscal 2025 and up 6% sequentially.

The increase was primarily due to mix, as we sold well in the North and Pacific regions, particularly in our luxury move-up business. Our Q1 adjusted gross margin was 26.5%, 25 basis points better than our guidance of 26.25%. Q1 gross margin exceeded our guidance, due primarily to operating efficiency. We are maintaining our full-year adjusted gross margin guidance of 26.0% and project a Q2 margin of 25.5%. In the H2 of the year, and especially in the Q4, we expect our adjusted gross margin to rise as our deliveries mix should include a greater contribution from our higher-margin North and Pacific regions. Write-offs in our home sales gross margin totaled $11.7 million in the quarter.

Approximately $5 million of these related to pre-development costs and option write-offs, with the remainder associated with a handful of operating communities in different markets around the country. SG&A, as a percentage of revenue, was 13.9% in the Q1 compared to our guidance of 14.2%. The 30 basis point beat relative to our guidance was due primarily to leverage from higher than anticipated home building revenues. Note that our SG&A margin in the Q1 is higher, as it generally is our lowest revenue quarter, and it includes accelerated employee stock-based compensation, compensation expense that only hits in the Q1. Joint venture, land sales, and other income was $72 million in the Q1, compared to $2.5 million in the Q1 of fiscal 2025, and our guidance of $70 million.

During the quarter, we substantially completed our previously announced sale of about half of our apartment living portfolio for net cash proceeds of approximately $330 million. The $72 million of joint venture, land sales, and other income includes the net gain associated with this sale. As we noted on our last call, we intend to fully exit the multifamily development business over the next several years. Our tax rate in the Q1 was 22.9%, 30 basis points better than guidance. We ended the Q1 with approximately $3.4 billion of liquidity, including $1.2 billion of cash and $2.2 billion of availability under our revolving bank credit facility. Our net debt to capital ratio was 14.2% at Q1 end, compared to 21.1% one year ago.

Turning to our guidance, I will remind you that our projections are subject to all the caveats regarding forward-looking statements included in our earnings release. We are projecting fiscal 2026 Q2 deliveries of approximately 2,400-2,500 homes, with an average delivered price between $975,000 and $985,000. For full fiscal year 2026, we are maintaining our projected deliveries of between 10,300 and 10,700 homes, with an average price between $970,000 and $990,000. As I noted earlier, we expect adjusted gross margin to be 25.5% for the Q2, and we continue to project 26.0% for the full year.

We expect interest in cost of sales to be approximately 1.1% in the Q2 and for the full year. We project Q2 SG&A as a percentage of home sales revenues to be approximately 10.7%. For the full year, we continue to expect it to be 10.25%. Other income, income from unconsolidated entities and land sales gross profit in the Q2 is expected to break even. We continue to expect $130 million for the full year, of which we have already realized $72 million. Included in our H2 projection is the sale of several stabilized apartment projects.

We project the Q2 tax rate to be approximately 26%, and for the full year rate to be approximately 25.5%.... Based on land we currently own or control, we expect to grow community count by 8%-10% by the end of fiscal 2026, and are targeting 480-490 communities. We expect to be selling from 455 communities at the end of the Q2. Our weighted average share count is expected to be approximately 96 million for the Q2 and 95 million for the full year. This assumes we repurchase a targeted $650 million common stock for the full year, with most of that occurring later in the year, aligned with our anticipated higher cash flows. Now, let me turn it back to Doug.

Thank you, Gregg. We remain positive on the long-term future of the U.S. housing market. Owning a home continues to be a key aspiration for tens of millions of American families. The market is supported by strong demographic tailwinds, driven by the millennial generation reaching its peak home buying years, and Gen Z following right behind. The baby boomers, who have built up enormous wealth over their lifetimes, are passing it down in the greatest generational wealth transfer in history. They are also in the market buying homes as they enter the next stage of their lives. Our country has also enjoyed years of stock market success. In addition, the vast majority of the 88 million American households that own a home have participated in significant home price appreciation over the past decade. These are powerful drivers of long-term demand. On the supply side, the market continues to be underserved.

Depending on the estimate, the market would need anywhere between an additional 3 and 7 million new homes to reach equilibrium based on population growth. So basic economic forces, strong underlying demand and low supply, create a solid foundation for the housing market. We believe that over time, affordability pressures will recede, and buyers who have been priced out will come back to the market, creating a much healthier housing ecosystem. In the meantime, we are pleased to be serving a more affluent customer in our luxury business. We will continue to navigate this market with the goal of driving strong returns for our stockholders. I would like to thank our Toll Brothers employees. Their hard work, talent, dedication, and commitment to our customers is the reason we've once again been named the number one home builder on Fortune's list of the world's most admired companies.

Thank you. We'll now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. If at any time your question has been addressed, and you'd like to withdraw your question, please press star then two. Once again, we do ask you, limit yourself to one question and a single follow-up. Today's first question comes from John Lovallo at UBS. Please go ahead.

Good morning, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. The first one is, you've exceeded your gross margin outlook in each of the past 13 quarters by 65 basis points on average. So sort of with that as a backdrop, what's driving the 100 basis points sequential decline from 26.5 in 1Q to 25.5 in 2Q?

Hi, John. It's mix. You know, Gregg touched on it. We will have less Pacific in the Q2, which is for us a very high margin region. That reverses itself as the year progresses, particularly in the Q4, when we will have a lot more coming out of both the North and the Pacific, which are our number one and number two margin areas.

Got you. Okay, and then curious on your thoughts of, the Sumitomo acquisition of Tri Pointe. I mean, obviously, they-- there's an effort to diversify away from an aging demographic in Japan, but, you know, the Japanese in general tend to be pretty big proponents of off-site construction. I mean, do you think that they have a bigger goal in mind here to bring more technology, sort of like Toyota did in the 1980s in the automotive industry?

I don't know the answer to that. I'm not close enough to it. Doug Bauer could probably help you out on that one. I'm sure there's been conversations around how they intend to invest in his great company. You know, they've obviously been aggressive in terms of getting into the U.S. housing market through the acquisition of a number of mid-cap-sized builders. That's between, of course, you know, not. It's Daiwa also, we put in that conversation with their MDC deal. So I don't know. You know, the Japanese have always been innovative. We have had a very hard time as an industry, you know, making that innovation, that technology, you know, lead to more efficient home building operations.

You've heard me say many times that in my 35.5 years here at Toll Brothers, it's the way we build houses has changed very little from when Bob Toll sent me out in the field with... When he told me to go buy a pair of Timberland boots and get in a trailer. And so I, I am-- We are all anxiously awaiting more innovation and technology to the industry. Maybe the Japanese can help in that regard, I don't know. But it's been, it's been a tough nut to crack for all of us.

... Thank you. Our next question today comes from Steven Kim at Evercore ISI. Please go ahead.

Good morning. This is Randa on for Steven. First question, I kind of wanted to dig into your spec strategy. Today, you reiterated that you're comfortable with the spec ratio around 50%, and that you would like to close your specs early in the construction process. Say that demand is insufficient to maybe support kind of both parts of your spec strategy, which would you prioritize? Would you either, you know, slow your spec starts, but continue to sell them earlier under the construction process, or maybe sell later, but maintain that 50% spec ratio?

Hey, Randa, it's Karl. We are happy now with the 50/50 mix. You'll see that change quarter to quarter, may go up and may come down. To your question about, you know, a softening, we are very comfortable, and as we outlined, execute well at a high margin on the build to order business. So we would pull back if there's more softening. We're not gonna blindly build specs into a softening market. And we are working to sell them at an earlier stage. You know, the trick for us is getting our customers into the Design Studio to make their selections. It's a unique process. We execute well there.

So, yes, we would, we would lean in to build to order if the market softened.

Got it. That makes sense. And then curious, what kind of long-term net debt to cap are you targeting? And how do you think about cash, how much cash you want to hold going forward?

Hey, hey, Randa, it's Gregg. Yeah, long-term, net debt to total cap, we think somewhere in the mid-teens makes, makes a lot of sense for us. And then, in terms of what our cash holdings need to be, you'll see they, they generally accelerate, as you move into the H2 of the year. But, you know, we probably have a minimum holding of $a few hundred million just to meet normal, operating expenses, including land purchases. But you know that that's kind of the general cash flow cadence that we see throughout the year.

Thank you. Our next question today comes from Sam Reid at Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.

Thanks, guys. Karl, welcome to the call. Wanted to unpack the January to date comments. And would you just characterize the traffic and sales that you're seeing, you know, as better, as potentially good relative to normal seasonality, or is it just tracking in line with normal seasonality? Maybe just trying to parse through that difference there. And then, we've heard some comments from peers that weather's been a little bit of a headwind year to date. It doesn't sound like that's been the case for you, but any comments on impacts from weather?

Sam, it's Doug, I'll take this one. There's three, there's three data points, right? We've got web traffic, we've got physical traffic visiting our communities, and we've got deposits. Because agreements lag one week to three weeks behind deposits, when you look at the last month, the agreement number is not, you know, as relevant. For all three of those, web traffic, physical traffic, and most importantly, deposits, we are up modestly over last year, same period of time. It's modest. It's too early to be high-fiving around here, but, you know, it causes us to have what we call, the industry likes to call, you know, cautious optimism, and that's where it is. But it, you know, we're in mid-February.

We'll have to see how it plays out, but we are, you know, we knew it would increase as mid-January hit, consistent with the beginning of what we call the spring selling season, and it did, of course, increase. But it is only up modestly over a year ago, but at the moment, we'll take it.

Weather, weather. I'm sorry. Do you hear? I'm sorry. Your question about weather.

My apologies. You know, North Carolina, Raleigh, and Charlotte got slammed. Nashville has been on the news. You know, kids didn't go to school for a week. Vanderbilt lost half of their beautiful trees, my, my friends tell me from kids being there, and Atlanta got hit. So you know, that, that corridor, you know, the Mid-Atlantic, from, from North Carolina down to Georgia, definitely had an impact, slowed us down for a week to 10 days. But outside of that, you know, Philly, New York, Boston, Washington recovered pretty quickly. So, I, I think it's just the Carolinas to Atlanta corridor that we, we felt it.

All helpful color there, Doug. And then, maybe switching gears on the PNL to gross margins. You talked a little bit about gross margins improving sequentially in Q3 and Q4. Sounds like Q4 is gonna be particularly strong, just given the timing of some of those luxury closings. But would just love maybe a little bit more nuance around the cadence of margin in the third and Q4s. Thanks.

Hey, Sam. It's Karl. Yeah, we expect that the back half to be better. It's mixed again. It's actually similar to the answer around the Q2. So in the back half of the year, you'll see more revenue out of the Pacific and the North, as well as more of that move-up luxury that I referenced in my remarks, and that's what's contributing to the improvement, and we see more of that even in Q4.

... That's right. Yeah. Karl, if I could just add on to it for you, for you, Sam. Yeah, Q3 is probably slightly improved over Q2, and then we expect benefit to accelerate a bit in Q4.

Thank you. Our next question today comes from Mike Dahl at RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Hi, this is Chris on for Mike. Just to follow up on that 3Q, 4Q gross margin step up outside of mix, and we could just talk about how you guys are thinking about pricing, incentives, costs, and some of the other financial impacting gross margin outside of mix?

Yeah, hey, so incentives, as we go throughout the year, we've maintained them at current levels. So there's no assumption that the market, you know, has a dramatic improvement or anything like that. So it should be... You know, we tried to underwrite for today's conditions throughout our projection, and that's where we left it.

We're beginning to see a little bit of downward pressure, downward move, downward improvement on building costs, but it's small. You know, lumber right now is a little bit of a headwind, but there's other costs that are coming down. But in terms of our projections, we're just going into it, assuming they'll stay flat.

Understood. Appreciate that. Just maybe if you guys can just touch on, like, seeing the land market today, the outlook there as you progress through the year, and how aggressive you guys plan on being in investing in land this year.

Yeah. Hey, Mike, it's Karl again. I think we're still seeing that low- to mid-single-digit inflation on land.

Thank you. And our next question today comes from Michael Rehaut at JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Good morning, everyone. Thanks for taking my questions, and congrats, Doug and Karl, on your upcoming moves.

First, you know, I, I just wanted to dig in a little bit also on the comments around kind of year-to-date trends, and I think, you mentioned just, just earlier that, you know, you're up modestly versus a year ago. I just wasn't sure if that was, you know, in terms of sales pace in particular or any other metrics. And more broadly, you know, as you talked about incentives being consistent for, I think, three months in a row, you know, that's not necessarily what we've heard from other builders. I think maybe perhaps they're more spec or first-time builder oriented, but buyer oriented. But, you know, there has been a lot of movement around incentives over the last three months, I think, on a broader market basis.

So, you know, just would love to understand, number one, again, you know, the up modestly versus a year ago, what exact metrics are those, if it's sales pace? And number two, how your own incentive strategy is differing from the market?

Sure. I'll take this one. All three metrics I mentioned, web traffic, foot traffic to our communities, and deposits, all three of those, each of those are up modestly over a year ago. With respect to incentives, we're comfortable with the guide around 8%. That's where we've been, as I mentioned, for the last three quarters. While, you know, we did focus in Q1 on leaning into our completed specs a little bit more because we did want to bring that number down, and we have had success in doing that, where we are now very comfortable moving forward with our mix of the stage of construction of our specs.

Some of those completed specs required a little bit more incentive to move them, but that was offset by a modestly lower incentive in our build-to-order business, which was very encouraging. And when you put it all together, it came out to the same 8%. And even though we did lean into selling a bit more of the finished inventory, to get down to what we think is the right percentages, we were still able to beat margin. So that was... I'm very proud of that, in today's environment. And, you know, we think we have fully budgeted and have conservatism in our internal projections around, you know, the spec business, which is where the incentive can be a bit higher. And so we're very comfortable with that 8% number.

We think it'll stick right in that range. We're very comfortable with the full year guide around margin.

Thank you. Our next question today comes from Alan Ratner at Zelman & Associates. Please go ahead.

Yeah, congrats again to both Doug and Karl. Yeah, I guess first I'll add on to the incentive trend. You know, personally, I think it's encouraging. I guess, I think you said 3 quarters in a row that incentives have been stable at 8%, and it doesn't sound like you're expecting much movement from here in the near term. But I'm curious, you know, as we head into the spring, which typically does have a little more pricing power than the winter, what would you need to see to try to take a stab at dialing back some of those incentives? Is it, you know, thinking about absorptions on a year-over-year basis? Is it thinking about what mortgage rates do?

I'm just curious, you know, at what point you might get more, more aggressive in trying to dial some of those incentives back.

Yeah, I think, you know, we, Alan, it's a great question. If the market improves, we're going to first lean into pace. Right now, we're running at a 24 pace per year per community to a month.... you know, we have the operation capacity in the field and the infrastructure, you know, the organization out there to build into the low 30s per community per year. So the first thing you're going to see is for us to increase pace. But as that happens, you know, price will probably also go up because it's just the nature of more and more people get in your sales office, and there's more activity, and the deposit starts popping up on the site plan and the sales center, and urgency. It's an amazing thing what happens with urgency.

So that will not just drive pace, but it'll also drive price. We will first lean into pace.

Got it. That makes a lot of sense. And, you know, you mentioned having the infrastructure to, to build 30, 30 homes a year per community. You know, as you think about labor and cost in general, obviously, I think that was the big, positive surprise in 25, in terms of the cost relief that builders were able to see in spite of the tariffs. I'm curious how you see the labor environment today. We have seen a little bit of an uptick in lumber prices to start the year. Yeah, what, what's the, the flex in the, the supply chain right now, where if we do see a strong spring, do we, you know, is there any risk that labor can become tight again, costs can begin creeping higher? Just curious what your thoughts there are.

Hey, Alan. Yeah, we are not seeing the impact from tariffs. On the good news, we're seeing plenty of availability of labor, more and more people showing up to the job site that want to work. I think our scale is going to continue to help us with suppliers, and so I think it's too early to tell. You know, if there's a really robust spring, which we'd be happy to see, it's hard to see if there's going to be pressure ahead. But we'll continue to leverage our scale and the rationalization that we have done with our products over the last several years to minimize those impacts.

Thank you. And as a reminder, if you'd like to ask a question, please press Star, then one. Our next question comes from James McCanless with Citizens. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning, everyone. Just wanted to focus on the cost side a little bit. Sounds like labor and construction costs are maybe in Toll's favor. Are you seeing any opportunities to maybe lean in on land purchases, especially since Toll seems to be doing better than a lot of other builders out there?

Jay, I think we're seeing, because of who we are and what we build, I think the opportunity for us to structure land deals with seller financing over time more efficiently has always been a part of the playbook. I think we are, to your question, we are seeing a little bit more of those opportunities of late, which is encouraging on the land side. But broadly speaking, we just have less competition. There are fewer and fewer builders that have capital and the desire to build, you know, luxury homes north of $1 million, and that plays right into what we do well. So we'll continue to watch it. And we are seeing a little bit of an opportunity for some well-structured land deals.

That's good news. Could you talk about the opportunity to raise prices? It sounds like Pacific and North are doing well, but maybe what percentage of your communities this quarter were you able to raise prices, and how is that outlook going forward?

30%-40% of our communities saw a price increase in Q1. You're right, the North is the strongest. Boston down to, really, Boston down to South Carolina. That full corridor is no longer Boston to Washington, D.C.

It extends with Raleigh, Charlotte, our four South Carolina markets and Atlanta. Atlanta's been a bit softer lately, but certainly through South Carolina, we have done the best. You know, we had a community in down in the Delray Boca Raton area that took 10 sales at $1.5 million in the quarter with a mid-thirties gross margin. We have a community in central New Jersey at the beach, took 12 sales in the quarter at $1 million-$1.2 million, north of 30 gross margin. Southern Cal, at the Great Park, everyone knows the Great Park, right next to Irvine Ranch, took 23 sales in the quarter at a community that sold between $1.5 million and $3 million. So, you know, there, there's still action out there, and there's still pricing power.

It's relatively limited, but, you know, I think I fully described it. I think 30%-40% is about the right range of where we saw some price increases. And by the way, that's, I've been corrected. Those numbers I just gave you for sales was not in the quarter, it's in the last eight weeks. Thank you, guys. So it's in the last two months.

Toll Brothers (TOL) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Company Participants