With a combined revenue of $21 trillion and $2.1 trillion in profits, the 2026 Fortune 500 is the definitive list of America's largest companies.

Fortune 500

The 300 companies on this year’s list brought in over $12.5 trillion in revenue for the latest 12 months, with the median revenue figure at $24 billion.

America's Most Innovative Companies

AI is a major force shaping this year’s list—but it’s far from the only story.

World's Most Admired Companies

Almost $20 trillion in revenue—and a record-breaking $1.87 trillion in profits. Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive list of the biggest companies in America.

The 300 companies on this year’s list brought in over $12.6 trillion in revenue for the latest 12 months, with the median revenue figure at $22 billion.

Leaders in all industries rely more than ever on Big Tech—and appreciate the giants that deliver, at scale, without drama.

Industries included in the sector are diversified and specialty chemical manufacturers.

Fortune Sector Leaders: Chemicals

The Fortune 500, in its 70th year in 2024, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

The 200 companies on this list are transforming industries from the inside out.

The 26th edition of the list shows how much esteem Big Tech giants command among other business leaders.

The 25th Fortune World’s Most Admired Companies list suggests that tech giants’ peers respect them as much as ever.

The Fortune 500, in its 69th year in 2023, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 68th running of the list.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 67th running of the list.

F500-2021-162-Sherwin-Williams

The paint and coating company began selling ready-mixed paint in 1875. First quarter 2021 net sales were up 8.6% year over year in the Americas Group, largely thanks to a do-it-yourself home renovation craze brought on by the COVID pandemic.

For an astounding 13th straight year, Apple claims the top spot in Fortune’s annual ranking of corporate reputation, based on a survey of almost 3,800 executives, directors, and analysts.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 66th running of the list.

F500-2020-180-Sherwin-Williams

The paint company develops and manufactures paints and related products and distributes them to consumers and companies.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 65th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 64th running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2017 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 63rd running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 62nd running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 61st running of the list. Wal-Mart claims the top spot again. See who made the list.

Wal-Mart stayed on top as its sales crept closer to half-a-trillion dollars. Apple moved into the top five. And UnitedHealth Group continued its steady climb. 

Sector

Industry

Current All-Star Rank

Previous All-Star Rank

Industry Rank

Previous Industry Rank

Overall Score

Innovation

People Management

Use of Corporate Assets

Social Responsibility

Quality of Management

Financial Soundness

Long-Term Investment Value

Quality of Products/Services

Global Competitiveness

Strongest Dimension

Years on list

Previous rank

State

Key Financials (last Fiscal Year)

Revenues ($M)

Profits ($M)

Assets ($M)

Total Stockholder Equity ($M)

Profit Ratios

Profit as % of Revenues

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholder Equity

Earnings Per Share (last Fiscal Year)

Earnings Per Share ($)

EPS % Change (from prior fiscal year)

EPS % Change (5 year annual rate)

EPS % Change (10 year annual rate)

Total Return

Total Return to Investors (last year)

Total Return to Investors (5 year, annualized)

Total Return to Investors (10 year, annualized)

Sherwin-Williams manufactures and distributes paints, coatings, and related products for residential, commercial, and industrial use. The company operates through a network of company-operated stores and facilities, serving both professional contractors and do-it-yourself consumers. Its product offerings include interior and exterior paints, stains, and protective coatings. Sherwin-Williams also supplies coatings to original equipment manufacturers and industrial markets.

Q2 2026

Q1 2026

Q4 2025

Q3 2025

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Q4 2024

Sherwin-Williams (SHW): Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings

legacy

Sherwin-Williams

sherwin-williams

Good morning. Thank you for joining The Sherwin-Williams Company's Review of Second Quarter 2026 and our Outlook for the Third Quarter and Full Year of 2026. With us on today's call are Heidi Petz, Chair, President, and Chief Executive Officer, Ben Meisenzahl, Chief Financial Officer, Paul Lang, Chief Accounting Officer, and Jim Jaye, Senior Vice President in Investor Relations and Communications. This conference call is being webcast simultaneously in listen-only mode by ACCESS Newswire via the internet at www.sherwin.com. An archived replay of this webcast will be available at www.sherwin.com beginning approximately two hours after this conference call concludes. This conference call will include certain forward-looking statements as defined under the U.S. Federal securities laws with respect to sales, earnings, and other matters.

Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of which such statement is made. The company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. A full declaration regarding forward-looking statements is provided in the company's earnings release transmitted earlier this morning. After the company's prepared remarks, we will open the session to questions. I will now turn the call over to Jim Jaye.

Good morning to everyone. Thank you for joining our call. Sherwin-Williams delivered strong top and bottom-line growth in the quarter amid ongoing global uncertainty and without any meaningful improvement in demand. Our sales outperformance reflects continued execution of our strategy, new account wins, and a clear return on prior growth investments as sales exceeded guidance on a consolidated basis and in all three reportable segments. Consolidated sales grew by a high single-digit percentage, inclusive of a low single-digit contribution from the Suvinil acquisition. Reported gross margin decreased slightly, but increased excluding the dilutive impact of Suvinil. Targeted pricing actions during the quarter enabled us to offset raw material inflation. Reported SG&A expense increased by a mid-single-digit percentage, but decreased 90 basis points as a percent of sales.

The increase was driven primarily by non-annualized Suvinil acquisition costs and higher employee service costs related to the greater-than-expected year-over-year sales and profit improvement in the quarter. We expect full-year reported SG&A to increase by a mid-single-digit percentage. Adjusted diluted net income per share increased approximately 10%. Adjusted EBITDA grew by 10.5% to $1.5 billion. Adjusted EBITDA margin expanded 60 basis points to 21.5% of sales. Net operating cash improved by 21%, or $235 million in the quarter, driven by an increase in net income and working capital being a higher source of cash year-over-year. Free cash flow conversion was 86%. Consistent with our disciplined approach to capital allocation, we took advantage of volatility in the market to accelerate share repurchases in the quarter. Combined with dividends, returned $1.5 billion to shareholders.

We ended the second quarter with a strong balance sheet and a net debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio of 2.4 times. Based on our strong first half performance, as well as our assumptions for the remainder of the year, we are increasing our full-year consolidated sales and EPS guidance. Let me now turn it over to Heidi, who will provide some color on second quarter segment performance before moving on to our outlook and your questions.

Thank you, Jim. I want to begin by thanking our more than 64,000 employees for their relentless focus on executing on behalf of our customers. In an environment that remains challenging, our employees continue to work hard and find new ways to deliver the reliability, consistency, and customer-focused solutions that set Sherwin-Williams apart. The strength of our strategy is evident in our performance. We are continuing to widen the gap between Sherwin-Williams and the competition through meaningful customer engagement, robust new account growth, and meaningful share gains across the business. At the same time, we continue to focus on optimizing the enterprise and controlling our costs, as evidenced by the restructuring actions taken during the quarter. We expect these actions will result in approximately $17 million of annual savings, with about half realized over the remainder of this year.

Looking at our segment results in the second quarter, I'll begin with Paint Stores Group, which grew by a mid-single digit percentage. Price mix grew at the low end of mid-single digits and volume increased by a low single-digit percentage. Our team delivered growth in all pro segments. Protective & Marine continued its momentum as sales increased by a mid-teens percentage versus a high single-digit comparison. It was the eighth straight quarter of at least high single-digit growth in this business. Data centers, semiconductor infrastructure, and manufacturing onshoring are among several drivers of this growth, where customers continue turning to Sherwin-Williams for a suite of solutions that can be delivered quickly and consistently. In the commercial business, the gains we have been targeting over the past 24 months are now evident as sales increased by high single digits in an underlying market that remains soft.

These efforts have also resulted in the mid-single digit increases in residential repaint and property maintenance. New residential remained very challenging as single family starts and completions have been negative for five of the last six months. Meaningful account wins propelled us to low single-digit growth in the quarter. Segment profit grew by mid-single digits and segment margin was 24.6%. As planned, we have opened 45 new stores year to date and also as planned, closed 57 or about 1% of total PSG stores. As we have done for decades, we continually assess and optimize our store portfolio to drive profitability, strengthen operational flexibility, drive improvement in return on net assets employed, and ensure that we maintain the highest level of service for our customers. Sales are not being negatively impacted by this targeted surgical approach as our mid-single digit growth year to date is meaningfully outpacing the market.

We are still on pace to open 80-100 new stores for the year, though the net number will be approximately 30. The cost of closing stores year to date is immaterial, and the store footprint optimization initiative is behind us. We fully expect to be at the high end of 80-100 net new stores beginning next year, given the trimming we have completed this year. We also announced an 8% price increase effective September 1st to offset raw material and other cost inflation. Because of our strong supplier relationships and disciplined supply chain execution, we were able to delay this increase for customers and avoid disrupting their business during the height of the paint selling season. We expect effectiveness of this increase to be in our typical range, though we will continue to be opportunistic in pursuing additional volume.

Consumer Brands Group sales exceeded our expectations, driven by a mid-teens contribution from the Suvinil acquisition. Mid-single digit price mix and low single digit FX were partially offset by a low single digit decrease in volume. Group sales, excluding Suvinil, increased by mid-single digits, and our legacy Latin America business, excluding Suvinil, increased by a low double-digit percentage. North America sales increased by high single digits against a soft comparison and included low single digit volume growth. The North America growth was driven by new product offerings, favorable mix, and the pro who paints, as DIY demand remained muted. Sales decreased in Europe by a double-digit percentage against the high teens comparison, driven by customer inventory management and destocking. Adjusted segment margin increased 210 basis points to 24.5%.

Leverage from mid-single digit sales growth and flat SG&A, excluding Suvinil, drove half of the improvement, with the other half coming from favorable non-operating items. In Performance Coatings Group, sales beat expectations with growth in every division and region. These results reflect the strong new account focus that we continue to drive as demand largely remains unchanged in our underlying core business. Price mix and volume both grew by low single digits in the quarter, with price mix greater than volume. FX was a low single digit tailwind. Growth was strongest in the general industrial division, led by strength in heavy equipment as sales were up high single digits inclusive of mid-single digit volume growth. Automotive Refinish also grew in the high single digit range, driven by price mix and favorable FX. Packaging continued its strong performance as sales increased by mid-single digits against a low teens comparison.

Coil and wood also delivered mid-single digit growth. Group sales expanded in all regions, including a strong double-digit increase in Asia Pacific and mid-single digit growth in North America. Adjusted segment margin increased 50 basis points with strong incremental margin of 26.4%. Within the administrative segment, SG&A declined 9.8%. As a reminder, this improvement largely reflects a favorable year-over-year comparison with the prior year period, including approximately $49 million of severance and other restructuring expenses versus approximately $3 million in the current quarter. The slide deck accompanying our press release this morning provides more detail on second quarter segment results. Now, moving on to our guidance. Our better than expected first half performance gives us increased confidence in our ability to deliver growth through the balance of the year. Importantly, our updated outlook assumes there is not a broad-based demand recovery.

Customer feedback and the leading indicators we track continue to show limited signs of meaningful improvement in most end markets. In this environment, we continue to focus on the levers within our control, securing incremental volume while maintaining the products, services, and supply solutions which drive productivity and profitability for our customers. Inflation remains a variable we are actively managing. Our supplier relationships are strong and continue to be a competitive advantage. We do not expect raw material availability to be an issue for us. At the same time, we are not immune from inflation. We are seeing the impact of higher oil and related cost pressures. We expect continued volatility throughout the balance of the year. We expect inflation in our raw material basket to be up in the high single digit range in the second half, moving our full year outlook to the mid-single digit range.

We have taken a thoughtful approach to balance the timing and amount of price increases for our customers. We are taking actions to keep pace with inflation while continuing to deliver the products, services, and solutions that our customers value. We expect consolidated price mix for the year to increase to the mid-single-digit range. We expect to maintain full-year gross margin at last year's level at the midpoint of our guidance. The slide deck issued with this morning's press release includes our expectations for consolidated and segment sales for the third quarter and full year 2026. Based on our strong first half performance and the momentum that we are carrying into the second half, we are raising our full year sales and adjusted EPS guidance.

Consolidated sales are now expected to increase by a mid to high single-digit percentage. Adjusted diluted net income per share is now expected to be in the range of $11.80-$12.20 a share. Our guidance reflects stronger execution versus our initial January expectations, continued share gains, disciplined price cost management, and ongoing productivity actions. Our slide deck contains other details you may find useful for modeling purposes. We are encouraged by our second quarter performance and proud of what our teams accomplished during the first half of the year. Their execution demonstrates the strength of our business, the durability of our strategy, and the advantages that continue to differentiate us in the marketplace. Our mindset has not changed. In this environment, we know growth will need to come from what we do, not from what the market gives us.

We remain focused on being our own catalyst for growth, which means taking share, serving customers better than anyone else, and creating opportunities regardless of the demand backdrop. That's exactly where Sherwin-Williams excels. We intend to continue leaning into these strengths. At the same time, we are not satisfied, as we know there is more business to earn, more productivity to unlock, and more value to create. Our employees are the key to our success. I want to take a moment to speak directly to them and express my deep respect and appreciation. As we have just demonstrated, we will continue approaching the many opportunities ahead of us with urgency, discipline, and confidence in our ability to deliver. This concludes our prepared remarks. As a reminder, we will be hosting our financial community presentation at our new global headquarters and global technology center on September 24th.

I look forward to seeing many of you there. Please reach out to our investor relations team if you have not registered, as space is limited. With that, I'd like to thank you for joining us this morning. We'll be happy to take your questions.

Certainly. Everyone at this time will be conducting a question and answer session. If you have any questions or comments, please press star one on your phone at this time. We do ask that while posing your question, please pick up your handset if you're listening on speakerphone to provide optimum sound quality. In the interest of time, we do ask that participants please ask one question. Once again, if you have any questions or comments, please press star one on your phone. Your first question is coming from John McNulty from BMO Capital Markets. Your line is live.

Yeah, thanks for taking my question. Congrats on some really solid results, especially in a tough environment. I wanted to ask, maybe you can unpack a little bit. Mid-quarter, you and Nippon made a bid for Akzo. Then relatively quickly thereafter pulled that bid. I guess, can you walk us through the rationale for both moves and how we should be thinking about M&A going forward in terms of the opportunities that you may see out there?

Yeah. Good morning, John. I'll take that. We take a very disciplined approach, not only to our capital allocation philosophy that remains unchanged, but as it relates specifically to M&A. As you can imagine, we're constantly looking and assessing assets that would be a fit or an accelerator to our strategy. We pass on well over 90%, I would say, that cross our desk. When we look at those specific assets, those were very premium targeted assets that we had long admired. There was an opportunity at the right price, at the right time, at the right value, that would have been something that would absolutely have been complementary to our strategy.

Having said that, I think timing is everything, value is everything, and when we get to a point where we're two bids in, and which I think was a very fair, reasonable, and premium all-cash offer without the level of engagement that we wanted, it was a simple decision that there was absolutely more attractive uses of our shareholders' cash. The decision to walk away and put that cash to use was in our and our shareholders' best interest.

Thank you. Your next question's coming from Vincent Andrews from Morgan Stanley. Your line is live.

Thank you. Good morning, everyone. Can I ask for a little more color on the Consumer Brands margins? Obviously, very strong improvement. How should we expect those margins to move on a go-forward basis? I also sort of noticed versus the other two segments there wasn't really a call-out here on market share gains or anything. Obviously, some other nice call-outs, but nothing on the share gains. What drove these margins to be so much better than the other two segments, and what is the sustainability of it?

Hey, Vincent. It's Ben Meisenzahl. On the margin piece, it really comes from probably two parts. First, you look about half of it is coming from just the core operating performance. You look at the stronger sales that Consumer Brands had in the quarter. If I strip out Suvinil and just look at the core business, which was up about mid-single digits, the resulting SG&A was flat. You think about the leverage that you get in a situation like that. The other half of the margin expansion was from more favorable non-operating items. That also impacted the sequential first quarter to second quarter. If you back out those non-operating items, we're more flattish, first quarter to second quarter. That's what's driving the adjusted segment margin there.

Vincent, I'll add in from a market share standpoint. DIY, obviously, there's not been any meaningful improvement in that particular segment. Pro paint, however, we are seeing continued share gains there, and that's a testament to the team successfully executing on our strategy. We've got, obviously, our very strategic partnerships, Lowe's and Menards and others, but this is a growing segment. Still a small base, but the fundamentals are intact there. A lot of credit to the team for continued focus.

Thank you. Your next question's coming from Duffy Fischer from Goldman Sachs. Your line is live.

Just a question around kind of the implied guidance at the midpoint. In the first half, year-over-year, you guys were up about $0.40 of EPS. At the midpoint in the second half, you're up a little more than $0.10, even though you have a pretty big price increase rolling through in September. One, just wanted to see, what is it that might slow down, when you're looking at it year-over-year that would have a smaller increase? Second part of that, between Q3 and Q4, should Q4 be seasonally bigger than normal because of that price increase when you look at it versus history?

Hey, Duffy. Yeah, if you look at the year-over-year, there's two things really that impact the first half versus the second half. If you look first at the comps, last year's first half were more difficult than the second half. If you look at that phasing and what we're going against this year here, that does have an impact. If you do look at the second half of this year and that slower growth of EPS as we've talked about, we still expect that ramp up of raw material costs. We've taken our guide up a little bit for the back half or for the full year, and that's coming on the back half.

Even though we have pricing that we're still laying in and our commitment to staying in front of that with balanced management of the price cost environment, it is still an economic headwind that we're facing here. That's probably the biggest reason why you would see maybe a little less of the growth in the second half that you saw in the first half.

Thank you. Your next question's coming from Ghansham Panjabi from Baird. Your line is live.

Thank you, operator. Good morning, everybody. Heidi, going back to your comments on the outlook and just given the steady increase in interest rates recently, specific to the PSG segment, are you embedding any sort of volume deterioration sequentially for the back half of this year, which will be offset by share gain initiatives on your end? To sort of sum to that low single-digit volume growth, is that the right way to think about it? Thank you.

No. I look at this, Ghansham. We don't expect that to happen. We don't expect any material change. I'll see if Ben's gonna give some color commentary to give you a little bit more perspective, but I'll ask him to touch base in a minute. I just want to take a moment, though, and give you a little bit of segment perspective to reinforce my point. If you look broad strokes, and obviously we talk a lot about what's going on from a residential standpoint. New residential, I would say the exact opposite. Obviously very confident and the backlogs are stable, but the team is really standing tall. We continue to take share here. Our new account activity continues to be very strong, as are our active accounts where we're growing our current customers' share of wallet.

Even though it's a challenging market, we're still continuing to be very aggressive out there. We talk a lot about innovation with this segment, and we talk about innovating in and out of the can. Something I want to highlight here, this is really exciting. We just launched a product called Emerald Symmetry, and it's the best performing interior product that we've ever produced. Not only with the right performance characteristics, but it's going to be a great plant-based, zero VOC product, helping to really advance our sustainability agenda. We're doing a lot of work here in this current macro to certainly favor growth and square footage for these res repaint contractors. Volume certainly positive there. New residential continues to be under pressure.

We are outperforming as monthly single-family completions are down an average of high single-digits in 2026, while our sales were down a low single-digit. Demonstrating that we're taking share there. Certainly can touch on property maintenance. Our year-over-year rent growth remains weak, with some sequential improvement. I would underscore some. Our outperformance with low single-digit growth is also evidence of share gains. The market's not going to help us in any regard. I do want to take a moment here on Protective & Marine because it's been a fantastic highlight. I said this in the call earlier, but it's our eighth straight quarter of at least high single-digit growth. We are exceptionally and uniquely well-positioned, I would say, for some of these tailwinds. We talk a lot about data center build-out infrastructure, the semiconductor infrastructure.

The team is really going to market very effectively here with a very unique suite of solutions. Again, back to the comments earlier. We know the market's not going to help us. We're not waiting. We have a lot of time ahead of us this year. We know we can control what we can control, but we're going to expect that we outpace the market.

Gotcha. I'll add to what Heidi said there, and going back to the original part of your question. If you look at the phasing of volume, half over half in the guidance, it's relatively consistent. If you go back to our original guidance in January, our assumptions were the same. What's different is the level of volume is higher than what we would have expected, and you see that in our original January guidance, down low single digit to up low single digit Paint Stores Group volume, and now we are guiding to that up low single digit volume. That supports all the things that Heidi talked about there. Again, the quarter-over-quarter volume, you are going to see consistent, and what changes is the pricing as we try to balance that against the inflation.

Thank you. Your next question's coming from Gregory Melich from Evercore ISI. Your line is live.

Thanks. I guess I'd follow up on that last point. I think you mentioned in the prepared comments the price increase in September, you expect realization to be in the historic range. Is that the range that we've seen this year, I think the more like 40%, or is it the historic more 60%-70%? The second part of that question is, would that be enough for gross margins to grow year-over-year in the back half, given the raw material still accelerating?

Greg, starting with the back part of your question there, our expectation is that we're balanced with pricing, and our commitment has been to stay in front of that. You'll continue to see that there. Again, going back to your September price increase question, we normally see a glide path, and to Heidi's point, this pricing will be at that same historical trend. As you know, we have customers that have contracts. There are probably some things that go into 2027 as well. We would expect that over time that we're really able to capture that the same way. I'll remind you as well, the goal here has been to implement pricing when the market can support it, and when we can do it in a way that preserves our customer relationships and manages our ability to get share gains.

We felt that September provided the best balance between those objectives, and that's why you see us going right now.

Thank you. Your next question's coming from Patrick Cunningham from Citi. Your line is live.

Hi. Good morning. Thanks for taking my question. I was hoping you could just give a little bit of detail behind the drivers for both the commercial and protective segments. What sort of multi-quarter or multi-year visibility do you have there from some of your share gains, new product wins, anything that we should think about across those two strong segments?

Good morning, Patrick. It's Jim. I'd say on the commercial side, you're seeing this is a couple of quarters in a row where we're outperforming. We've talked about some of the market share opportunities that we've been targeting over the last 24 months or so. I think you're starting to see those come through in a more prominent way now. A lot of credit to the team that's driving the commercial side there. The other part of your question, Patrick, just again, was which other segment?

The P&M piece? The P&M piece is, Heidi, I think, touched on it. The data center build-out, the infrastructure build-out, semiconductor fabs. There's others that maybe aren't getting as much of a headline, but water treatment, pharmaceutical, the onshoring, all of that is opportunity for us. A great suite of solutions, flooring, structural steel, and there's also an architectural element of the office space in all of those applications as well.

Patrick, one other piece to add, and Jim mentioned this, but when we talk about AI data centers and the build-out, you think of the race of these hyperscalers and speed matters, and we can provide speed. We can provide a comprehensive one-shop solution for many of their coatings needs across the board that Jim just mentioned. We love the tailwind, and we're ready for it.

Thank you. Your next question's coming from John Roberts from Mizuho. Your line is live.

Thank you. Back to the original M&A question. Sherwin didn't appear to be interested in the number one European deco business. Why was that?

Well, we've looked at that, John, for a long time. One of the things that we love about our controlled distribution model, certainly is the backdrop, the market dynamics in which we sit here in North America. We absolutely are proud about the playbook that we've created. Obviously, there's a lot of agility within that playbook. The market fundamentals outside of North America simply don't support that level of capital deployment. We do think there are, again, other very attractive alternatives of shareholders' cash, and we're going to put that to good work.

Thank you. Your next question's coming from Arun Viswanathan from RBC. Your line is live.

Great. Thanks for taking my question. I was hoping to ask just on two segments, resi repaint and packaging. I think both of those were in the mid-single digit range, if I'm not mistaken. Could you just elaborate? It sounds like resi repaint, obviously, you've been at higher ranges before, but is that kind of plateauing? Is there anything else that you could do to drive higher growth there? Then similarly in packaging, are you still working on some share gains there? Where are we in the European BPA transition? Thanks.

Yeah, you bet. Well, let me start with res repaint. Is it plateauing? Absolutely not. In fact, I would say we're just getting started there. I'll remind you that this is the segment where we have the largest share gains ahead, and we are continuing to be agile and deploy resources and make sure that that team is well-prepared. There's a lot of share available for grabs right there. We're going to continue not only with our dedicated stores, our residential repaint reps, the product launches, the innovation that we're providing in the can, all of the digital suite of tools that we're innovating and continue to innovate for these residential repaint contractors, regardless of their size, to help them with their economics, be better planners, make sure that we're helping them, leveraging our multiple stores and helping them grow and travel.

We're in a really good place. Also a testament to the team. We've got an organization that we've long been focused on not just selling, but shifting to more of a consultative selling approach. Our team, I'm very proud of what our folks in the stores are doing day in and day out to help our customers succeed here. It's evident in our numbers, and we continue to expect that outsized growth. I'll touch on packaging. You mentioned mid-single-digit volume. That certainly was led by strength in beverage cans. We're clearly outgrowing the market here. I think the EPS piece you mentioned, the ban on BPA, taking effect in Q2, obviously of this year. That will continue to drive customer conversion back half of this year and into next year. We expect that to be goodness heading our way.

Thank you. Your next question's coming from Matthew DeYoe from Bank of America. Your line is live.

Morning. I just wanted to ask kind of a clarifying question a little bit on the consumer business. You'd mentioned some non-operating tailwinds. Absent that, things would've been flat quarter-over-quarter. Was that a margin would've been flat, or was that an EBITDA would've been flat? Can you just tie that up, then?

Yeah, Matt, that would've been the adjusted segment margin, would have been flat. Again, roughly half of the improvement that you saw quarter-over-quarter, if you had adjusted that for what we saw in the first quarter, you would've seen more flattish adjusted segment margins in CBG.

Okay. I appreciate that. That's helpful. Heidi, to jump back a little bit on John's earlier question, and I guess maybe both Johns. I don't know if I want to drag this conversation too much, but ultimately, what changed between your first two attempts on AkzoNobel and then the release of the slide deck and then your decision to walk away? I appreciate the price discipline comment, but conceptually, you kind of already had to come up in a more material way. The slide deck comes out, and then a few days later, you walk. Am I reading too much into what was a couple of days' lapse, or is there something else there? That deal isn't necessarily done, though I think the market expects, but just wondering how it relates to your appetite.

Conceptually, I would assume any spinoffs are fair game for sure, one to consider or asset separations rather.

Right. Matt, let me attack your question here. I think there's basically three parts of it. First, I do think you're assigning too much weight to the days. If you look at the discipline in which we think about capital allocation deployment, we've been looking at those assets for years. We're not desperate for those assets. I want to be very clear. We've said we don't need acquisition to grow. We have a lot of organic scale opportunity. The team is doing a fantastic job demonstrating that. We're not going fast enough. We'll happily take more. You asked about what's changed kind of between bid one and bid two.

It was what I stated earlier as we talked about putting a very, what we thought was not only a fair and reasonable but superior all-cash offer forward at some point without getting the level of engagement that you want. What we're not going to do is negotiate against ourselves if we're not desperate for these assets. We're going to be laser-focused on growing these businesses with or without. I think your third point, and it's a very fair point, should these assets fall out of the sky at the completion of the MOE at the right value, then we would absolutely take a look at those. It would have to be at the right value at the right time. I will take a moment, Matt, just to point to the success of Suvinil. It's a great example of capital being put to great use.

Just a moment on this, while you didn't ask about it, I think it demonstrates the discipline of how we think about M&A. We've long admired that asset down in Latin America and had been looking at that for over 10 years. We were very thoughtful in our approach, not just in terms of the deal, but in terms of the integration. Coming from the Valspar side and playing a big role in integration, it's extremely important that when we're thinking about success here, it is customer and employee first, and I'm very pleased with the success that the team is having. The business continuity continues to be our North Star, making sure that we're providing stability not only in our relationships with our customers, but in our service levels. I think the cultural compatibility is also worth noting. You've got two great teams coming together.

We say 1 + 1 = 3 here, the compatibility of strong teams and what we're able to do to leverage a strong asset of market leadership and certainly the strong ability to provide innovation from Sherwin-Williams. We are really just getting started there.

Matt, I just want to build on one thing that Heidi said here. Again, we've talked about how our cash generation remains a strategic advantage for us. You look at the first half, and it's really on display. We returned almost $1 billion more in cash to shareholders. We did the ASR in between when we walked away from the joint bid to when we were blacked out for the quarter. You can see us there taking decisive actions in an environment where our share price is on sale. You're going to continue to see us be really strategic with how we're managing our capital allocation, and just wanted to put an exclamation on that.

Thank you. Your next question's coming from David Begleiter from Deutsche Bank. Your line is live.

Thank you. Good morning. Heidi, just on DIY, I saw it did tick down versus the prior three quarters of it being up. What changed in the DIY market for you guys this quarter?

I don't think there's really any material shift there, David. It would be more nominal than material. We're still waiting for the catalyst to kick in on the DIY segment. I think if you look at bifurcating that segment, you've got more of the premium DIY homeowner in our stores that prefer a specialty kind of experience, and we're faring better there. The recovery there is certainly less inflationary sensitive. On the more value-conscious DIY homeowner that prefers a home center, still under pressure, but again, this is where our strategic partnerships are extremely important, that we continue to find new and different ways to look at that volume. I want to take a moment on this point, we talk a lot about this in our prepared comments, the fundamental theme here is we do not believe there will be a catalyst in the market anytime soon.

The charge to the team is that we have to be our own catalyst for growth. You're going to continue to hear us talk about that. There are a lot of levers that we can pull. They're not infinite, it is a control what we can control mindset, and that is what gives us confidence. We continue to focus on execution discipline. I think we've built strong credibility on that front because we've been able to demonstrate even in a challenging environment.

Thank you. Your next question's coming from Josh Spector from UBS. Your line is live.

Yeah. Hey, good morning. I wanted to follow up on the pricing side. I heard your comments around the realization of the 8% increase. Just trying to think about the timing of that relative to kind of your updated pricing guidance. It seems like my interpretation is maybe you're realizing 1%-2% in fourth quarter, and then maybe more of that falls into 2027. One, is that kind of the right interpretation? Two, what does that mean for your approach to pricing for what you typically do around Jan 1, 2027? Is that coming up in conversations now, or is that going to be a separate conversation three months from now? Thanks.

Hey, Josh. Yeah, the phasing of this. Again, we've done a lot of pricing throughout the year here. We're being realistic with what the approach is. I know we keep hammering back on volume being the premium. There is going to be a balance there to make sure that all the work that we've done to keep our customers and to make sure that we're able to supply them and keep a minimum price increase, because we did. We've waited long. As I mentioned, waiting until September, that was a strategic decision to make sure that we didn't impact our customers the way that some of our competitors may have by going earlier in the painting season. Obviously, the season is rolling over later in the year. That might have an impact on realization.

I can assure you that the way that we're approaching this year, it is balanced with the inflation that we continue to see. Obviously, that'll go into the first part of next year. That is part of the calculation. We're not ready to call anything beyond 2026 right now. We're watching this quarter-by-quarter, half by half. We'll continue to watch the market. There are uncertainties out there with what inflation will do, and our teams are constantly assessing what those impacts are and what actions we would need to take.

Thank you. Your next question's coming from Jeff Zekauskas from JPMorgan. Your line is live.

Thanks very much. A two-part question. You talked about 57 store closures. Is there a pattern to the closures? Are these unprofitable or in a particular region or too small? Why are they happening this year? Secondly, in terms of pricing, you're lifting your paint stores pricing by 8%. If you compare that pricing action to what's going on in performance coatings, should performance coatings price initiatives be at least that number because the raw material inflation would be a little bit higher, or is there some other dynamic at work? What are you doing in pricing and performance?

Jeff, good morning. I'll start the first question on the stores, then I'll hand it over to Ben. He can comment on the pricing question that you had. You asked if there was a pattern, there is a pattern. They didn't meet the profitability threshold. If you think about, we've built what I would consider one of the industry's premier distribution platforms over many, many decades, with that comes the responsibility for us to actively manage that platform. We're going to continue to open stores, you heard in my prepared remarks, as we were pruning, we wanted to take advantage of just this downturn, being really candid, to do that and make sure that we're favoring the best use of shareholder cash in the right places.

The expectation going forward is that we get to the higher end of that 80-100 net new stores beginning next year, you should expect to see us be aggressive there on that front. In this environment, while we've got this great platform, we think that it's in our shareholders' best interest if we are looking at making these increasingly productive, our platform increasingly efficient, leveraging AI where it makes sense and where it's helpful. Also making sure that we're increasingly aligned with where our customers are growing. That's what we're solving for, I think the result's going to be a healthier, more productive platform that better serves customers, better generates stronger returns for our shareholders. We're excited that this is behind us, we can move forward with a more productive platform. I'll hand it to Ben on the pricing question here.

Yeah, Jeff, on pricing, as you know, the way we go to market with pricing is very different between our architectural business and the industrial business. With PCG, and we've talked about this going back to April and even into January, where we had announced some pricing. It is a little more surgical within PCG. As you can expect with raw material inflation continuing to climb here in the second half, that PCG has been out with pricing a little more surgically by business unit or by region. Again, our decision to wait on the architectural side to make sure we preserved volume in our share, and made sure that we didn't put those pressures on our customers. It's a different approach that we have between the two different businesses. Your thought is right.

There's pricing out in all of our segments right now as we're trying to balance the price-cost dynamics that are there.

Thank you. Your next question's coming from Chuck Cerankosky from Northcoast Research. Your line is live.

Good morning, everyone. I'd like to talk a little bit about Suvinil, how the integration is going, where you're at in the process, and to what degree it contributed or dent to EPS dollars.

Hey, Chuck. Yeah, Suvinil continues to really be a great addition to Sherwin-Williams for us, and as we've talked about on the last couple of calls, really encouraged by what we're seeing down there as we're bringing Suvinil into the existing Sherwin-Williams business that's been there for 80 years. I think some of the highlights that I'd call out here, because our teams have gotten their hands more on what that Suvinil business brings. We've identified additional synergies, even things that maybe we didn't appreciate through the industrial lens when we were initially looking at opportunities. On the customer front, there's been a lot of really great growth opportunities as the two brands come together, and so we're really encouraged about that.

In April, I talked a lot about we were going to continue to be doing integrating activities the rest of this year into early part of next year. We still think it's an immaterial tailwind to our EPS for the year as we continue to merge the companies.

Thank you. Your next question's coming from Abigail Eberts from Wells Fargo. Your line is live.

Hi there. Thanks for taking my question and congrats on the quarter. You've talked in the past about your strategy for driving new business wins in paint stores with your rep network, your app launches and things like that. Can you speak to how you're driving new business wins in PCG, given the different customers?

Yeah, Abigail, good morning. I think Ben kind of alluded to this a little bit on the last question. These are very different models, different customers, end markets, regions. You're right. When you think about our ability to kind of standardize within Paint Stores Group, it's a little bit different on the performance coatings side. This is really a team with incredible tenure and expertise in these end markets and regions, and it really is about making sure that we are best serving these customers. If you think about some of the assets that we have on our performance coatings side that are fairly underappreciated, would be our blending facilities. Our ability to have these assets that are close to industrial wood coil, large customers, we're able to better serve oftentimes at days and weeks versus even longer versus our competitors.

These customers are willing to pay a premium for that. The speed, the consistency of color, our ability to demonstrate value every day affords us a position to create these new business opportunities and new business wins.

Thank you. Your next question's coming from Kevin McCarthy from VRP. Your line is live.

Sherwin-Williams (SHW) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Company Participants