With a combined revenue of $21 trillion and $2.1 trillion in profits, the 2026 Fortune 500 is the definitive list of America's largest companies.

Fortune 500

Almost $20 trillion in revenue—and a record-breaking $1.87 trillion in profits. Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive list of the biggest companies in America.

The 300 companies on this year’s list brought in over $12.6 trillion in revenue for the latest 12 months, with the median revenue figure at $22 billion.

America's Most Innovative Companies

The Fortune 500, in its 70th year in 2024, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

The 200 companies on this list are transforming industries from the inside out.

The 300 companies on this list are transforming industries from the inside out.

The Fortune 500, in its 69th year in 2023, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 68th running of the list.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 67th running of the list.

Regions offers consumer and commercial banking, mortgage services, and wealth management to clients in the South, Midwest, and Texas.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 66th running of the list.

F500-2020-446-Regions-Financial

This Alabama-based company’s subsidiary bank has about 1,400 offices and a 2,000-ATM network in the Southeast, Midwest, and Texas.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 65th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 64th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 63rd running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 62nd running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 61st running of the list. Wal-Mart claims the top spot again. See who made the list.

Wal-Mart stayed on top as its sales crept closer to half-a-trillion dollars. Apple moved into the top five. And UnitedHealth Group continued its steady climb. 

Sector

Culture rank

Process rank

Product rank

Years on list

Previous rank

Key Financials (last Fiscal Year)

Revenues ($M)

Profits ($M)

Assets ($M)

Total Stockholder Equity ($M)

Profit Ratios

Profit as % of Revenues

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholder Equity

Earnings Per Share (last Fiscal Year)

Earnings Per Share ($)

EPS % Change (from prior fiscal year)

EPS % Change (5 year annual rate)

EPS % Change (10 year annual rate)

Total Return

Total Return to Investors (last year)

Total Return to Investors (5 year, annualized)

Total Return to Investors (10 year, annualized)

Regions Financial Corporation is one of the largest full-service providers of consumer and commercial banking, wealth management, and mortgage products and services in the United States. Founded in 1971 after the merger of three Alabama banks, the company is a member of the S&P 500 Index and serves as one of the largest banks in America. Regions operates through three segments to offer clients and organizations in the South, the Midwest, and Texas banking services and wealth management.

Q3 2026

Q2 2026

Q1 2026

Q4 2025

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Q4 2024

Regions Financial (RF): Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings

legacy

Regions Financial

regions financial

Good morning, and welcome to Regions Financial Corporation's quarterly earnings call. My name is Chris, and I will be your operator for today's call. I would like to remind everyone that all participant phone lines have been placed on listen-only. At the end of the call, there will be a question-and-answer session. If you wish to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. I will now turn the call over to Chris Best to begin.

Thank you, Chris. Welcome to Regions' third quarter 2026 earnings call. John and Anil will provide high-level commentary regarding our results. We ask that you review the cautionary statements included in our earnings documents, which are available in the investor relations section of our website. These materials contain information regarding the use of non-GAAP measures and reconciliations to the GAAP results, as well as forward-looking statements about Regions' performance. These statements speak only as of today, and we undertake no obligation to update them. I will now turn the call over to John.

Thank you, Chris, and good morning, everyone. We appreciate you joining our call today. Earlier this morning, we reported earnings of $611 million, resulting in earnings per share of $0.71. On an adjusted basis, earnings were $622 million or $0.73 per share. We delivered adjusted pre-tax, pre-provision income of $870 million and an adjusted return on tangible common equity of 22%. As we move through the second half of the year, what stands out most to me is the consistency of our performance. While continuing to generate strong financial results, we've remained focused on strengthening the franchise through investments in talent, technology, products, and key markets. Those investments continue to enhance our ability to serve customers and compete effectively. Across our businesses, we continue to see healthy customer engagement. On the consumer side, we continue to grow households and checking accounts while deepening primary relationships.

Commercial clients continue to invest in their businesses, technology, and long-term growth initiatives. While the operating environment continues to evolve, activity levels across the franchise remain constructive. Credit quality continued to be a source of strength during the quarter. Annualized net charge-offs were 29 basis points of average loans, while business services criticized and total non-performing loans continued to decline. Despite these positive trends, we remain focused on actively managing risk across the portfolio. While soundness remains the foundation of our strategy, we're also generating strong momentum across our fee-based businesses. Capital markets and treasury management each delivered record revenue during the quarter, reflecting strong client engagement and continued execution across both businesses. Wealth management revenue moderated from record second quarter levels but remained strong relative to the prior year.

Collectively, capital markets, treasury management, and wealth management continue to perform at historically strong levels, demonstrating the strength of our diversified fee-based business model and the value we provide to our clients. We continue to make meaningful progress on our cloud-based deposit platform implementation and broader modernization efforts. As we have discussed previously, we are taking a deliberate, phased approach that we believe appropriately balances execution discipline with the scale and complexity of the initiative. This is one of the most significant technology investments in our company's history, and we remain confident in both our approach and the long-term benefits this investment will deliver. Our commitment to long-term investment extends beyond talent and technology to the communities we serve. This year marks 30 years as the official bank of the Southeastern Conference, a milestone we are proud to celebrate.

We believe the longevity of that relationship reflects the strength of our brand, the depth of our community relationships, and our longstanding commitment to customers and businesses we serve. As we look ahead, we remain confident in our position. We have a strong franchise, healthy customer relationships, and a leadership team focused on execution. We believe the investments we have made and the momentum we are seeing across the business position Regions well for a strong finish to 2026 and sustained success in the years ahead. Now, Anil will provide some highlights regarding the quarter.

Thank you, John. Let's start with the balance sheet. Both average and ending loans increased modestly versus the second quarter. As expected and consistent with market trends, growth moderated from the stronger pace experienced during the first half of the year. Growth was again driven by broad-based commercial lending activity, including continued strength across several C&I categories, including government and public sector and wholesale and financial services. While net loan growth remained concentrated among investment-grade commercial clients, production trends continued to be healthy across our emerging commercial and middle-market businesses, supported by recent talent investments. Consumer loan balances declined modestly during the quarter. Growth in credit card and home equity was offset by continued softness in residential mortgage and Regions Home Improvement Financing, reflecting the higher rate environment and muted housing market activity.

As we look ahead, current levels of client engagement, production activity, and pipeline strength continue to support our confidence in the growth outlook. We continue to expect full year average loan growth to be up low single digits versus 2025. Turning to deposits, both average and ending balances decreased modestly, primarily reflecting activity from a few of our largest commercial customers utilizing our institutional investment services for specific investment strategies, combined with expected seasonal outflows in public funds deposits. As a reminder, the company continues to manage substantial excess client balances for our commercial clients totaling approximately $16 billion through highly liquid off-balance-sheet investment solutions. Underlying commercial trends remain healthy with continued growth in new accounts and increases in both average and ending commercial non-interest-bearing balances during the quarter. Retail deposits performed as expected with growth in new accounts partially offset by late summer seasonal spending.

Consumer money market balances continued to grow while year-to-date small business account openings reached their highest level in the past decade, excluding the pandemic period, and are approximately 100 basis points higher than the prior year period. We remain disciplined in managing deposit costs in an elevated rate environment while leveraging the strength of our deposit franchise to drive customer acquisition and retention. Our non-interest-bearing deposit mix remained in the low 30% range, consistent with our target and reflective of the operational nature of our deposit base. We continue to expect 2026 average deposits to be up low single digits versus the prior year. Let's shift to net interest income. Net interest income increased 2% linked quarter, building on recent momentum and supported by structural repricing dynamics and balance sheet expansion. Net interest margin increased 2 basis points to 3.68%, reflecting our strong profitability and deposit funding advantage.

During the third quarter, interest-bearing deposit costs were largely stable, increasing just 1 basis point to 1.70%. Disciplined deposit cost management in our operating account mix continues to provide a strong foundation for earnings in the current elevated interest rate environment. We expect the interest-bearing deposit beta will remain in the mid to high 30% range through the rising rate cycle, supporting a mostly neutral interest rate risk position. In the fourth quarter, however, lags in the repricing of certain retail deposit products following the September rate hike will provide a modest lift in net interest income. We are positioned well to benefit from higher middle and long-term interest rates through fixed rate asset turnover. In the third quarter, yields on newly originated fixed rate assets were approximately 100 basis points higher than the yields on maturities.

We expect this repricing advantage to expand to between 100 and 125 basis points in the fourth quarter, providing a tailwind that persists for multiple years, assuming current rate levels while moderating through time. As previously mentioned, loan growth moderated during the quarter. However, we did see momentum pick up late, further supporting average balance and net interest income growth into the fourth quarter. The mix of loan growth continues to migrate towards high-quality credits, and while this creates a headwind for asset spreads, net interest income, and margin, the economic trade-off is evident in improving credit results and deepening customer relationships. Similarly, while the funding mix in the third quarter was negatively impacted by the migration of certain deposits to off-balance-sheet products, the resulting shift supports fee revenue. Looking forward, we expect a more balanced loan and deposit growth profile to sustain profitability.

Assuming the next Fed rate hike occurs in December, we expect fourth quarter net interest income to increase between 1% and 2%, supported by persistent tailwinds from higher rates, structural repricing, disciplined deposit cost management, balance sheet growth, and the seasonal HR asset dividend. The fourth quarter net interest margin is expected to be approximately 3.70%. Now let's turn to fee revenue performance for the quarter. Adjusted non-interest income increased 3% on a linked quarter basis, driven primarily by record capital markets and treasury management revenue, as well as growth in commercial credit fees, bank-owned life insurance income, and other non-interest income, partially offset by a $28 million decline in the market value on employee benefit assets. Capital markets income increased 23% compared to the prior quarter, driven by stronger M&A advisory activity, securities underwriting and placement fees, commercial swap income, and syndications revenue.

Looking ahead, activity levels remain constructive, and we continue to expect fourth quarter revenue to be within our previously communicated range of $90 million-$105 million. The timing of client activity and market conditions will influence where we land within that range. For full year 2026, we continue to expect adjusted non-interest income to grow between 3% and 5% versus 2025, with results continuing to track toward the lower end of that range. Let's move on to non-interest expense. Adjusted non-interest expense was relatively stable compared to the prior quarter. Lower salaries and benefits expense, attributable primarily to lower market value adjustments for supplemental employee benefit liabilities, along with a decline in other expense, helped offset higher equipment software expense and increased professional, legal, and regulatory costs during the quarter. As expected, continued investments in technology and infrastructure were offset by disciplined management across the broader expense base.

Overall expense trends remain consistent with our expectations for the year. For full year 2026, we continue to expect adjusted non-interest expense to be up between 1.5% and 3.5%, and we expect to deliver full year adjusted positive operating leverage. Regarding asset quality, we were encouraged by strong credit performance during the quarter, reflecting the strength and resiliency of our customer base and our continued disciplined approach to risk management. As John highlighted, annualized net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans declined 13 basis points to 29 basis points. Business services criticized and non-performing loans both improved during the quarter. The business services criticized ratio declined 30 basis points to 4.71%, while the non-performing loan ratio declined 8 basis points to 59 basis points. The allowance for credit losses ratio declined 2 basis points to 1.61%.

Continued progress within previously identified portfolios of interest were largely offset by reserves maintained for macroeconomic uncertainty and other qualitative factors, resulting in a relatively stable reserve balance during the quarter. We continue to expect full year 2026 net charge-offs to be between 40 and 50 basis points, and based on performance to date, now expect to trend toward the lower end of that range. Let's turn to capital and liquidity. We ended the quarter with an estimated common equity Tier 1 ratio of 10.8%, while executing $95 million in share repurchases and paying $255 million in common dividends during the quarter. Liquidity remains robust, with total sources well above required levels. Modest declines during the quarter reflect the impact of higher interest rates on collateral valuations, as well as the changes in loans and deposits discussed previously.

Regions remains well-positioned to support future loan growth while maintaining its disciplined approach to balance sheet management. Including the impact of AOCI and reflecting the proposed Basel III endgame risk-weighted asset changes, our estimated CET1 ratio was approximately 10%. This level remains well above our target range of 9.25%-9.75% and provides continued flexibility to support strategic growth and return capital to shareholders. Regions maintains a strong earnings profile that consistently generates capital, and we will continue to execute strategies to further reduce our sensitivity to interest rates. Overall, we're pleased with our third quarter performance, which reflects the strength of our franchise, the resiliency of our customer base, and the disciplined execution of our long-term strategy. We remain well-positioned to support our customers, invest in growth opportunities, and deliver sustainable value for shareholders. With that, we'll open the line for your questions.

Thank you. We will now be conducting a question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star two if you would like to remove your question from the queue. Please hold while we compile the Q&A roster. Thank you. Our first question comes from the line of Ryan Nash with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed with your question.

You guys have been able to buck the trend this quarter. Deposit costs are up just 1 basis point. Maybe just talk about expectations embedded in the 4Q NII guide and ahead. Anil, I know you mentioned they could lag a bit, but looking forward, just how do you think about balancing growing deposit to support the balance sheet and also continuing to maintain a peer leading margin? Maybe just a little bit of color on how you think about incremental funding from here. Thank you. And I have a follow-up.

Yeah, thank you. The most important thing to protect the margin is to make sure we continue to grow non-interest-bearing deposits. That has been a key focus of ours. That's why we are making the investments we are across our retail network, across the small business platform. We have seen great results so far this year. Small business operating accounts are up over 100 basis points this year, and so continuing to do that. It is day-to-day fighting, but that is the key to success. The overall composition of our balance sheet is also what helps us. Having a relatively lower loan-to-deposit ratio is helpful. Having a lower debt footprint is helpful. It allows us to continue to invest in profitable loan growth while being able to maintain deposit cost, flexibility, and having the funding needed to fund that growth through time.

Continuing to do that, being mindful of putting on good profitable loan growth, and continuing to execute growing non-interest-bearing deposits is the key to maintaining that flexibility and that deposit advantage and the NIM advantage going forward.

Ryan, I would just add, we are obviously not using rate as part of our deposit strategy to grow deposits. But we can if we need to. We have about $16 billion in off-balance sheet investment-related deposits that customers are holding either in a sweep product, basically, or with our institutional trust department. So we know that money is, we can easily attract that back to the bank with higher rates. Separately, on the consumer side, back in 2022, 2023, when rates were rising and we saw because of a very active program that we initiated to grow deposits, we grew CDs by about $7 billion, money market deposits by $4 billion, and we are able to do that at a deposit beta of about 44%. So when rates went up almost 500 basis points over that period of time.

We know we can grow deposits if we need to by using rate, and we're actively following our customer activity, but it's not part of our strategy, obviously, currently.

Got it. Thanks, John. Anil, maybe for a follow-up, just given the move in rates, your capital levels fell below the 9.25%, 9.75% without factoring in Basel III. I think TCE may have dipped a little below 7%. Maybe just talk about how you're planning on managing capital over the next few quarters, given decent loan growth. Are you factoring Basel III now into expectations? What timeframe would you expect to be back in that sort of targeted range that you guys have been focused on for a period of time here? Thank you.

Yeah. Importantly, under the current capital framework, our capital level is 10.8%, so very robust capital levels. To your point, if we wanted to pro forma for Basel III endgame, which we expect to see this year, that would take us to 10%, which is well above our 9.25%-9.75% range. Also, we generate 50 basis points of capital every quarter. This quarter is a great example that just really shows the organic capital generation that we have quarter to quarter. We'll pay 20 basis points out in a dividend, grow the balance sheet. We organically create capital as well. Then also when you think about the impact from AOCI given last quarter's rate moves, through time, we'll see that AOCI burn down assuming flat rates.

And so that's capital that accretes back to our balance sheet through time as well. And so we think we're well-positioned, given the organic capital we generate, given our overall capital position to continue to make all the investments we want to make and when appropriate, buy back shares through time as well.

Our next question comes from line of Scott Siefers with TD Cowen. Please proceed with your question.

Morning. Thank you for taking the question. Anil, I think you noted in your prepared remarks that loan demand picked up toward the end of the quarter, I believe. Hopefully, I'm not putting words in your mouth. We've heard that from a couple of regionals. I guess question and follow-up is, what do you think is driving that? Then on the flip side, is there a point where you think higher rates might start to impact demand a little more materially, I guess, on the negative side?

Yeah. This is John. We have seen nice activity toward the end of the quarter, as you pointed out. Production was up year-over-year about $4 billion. We saw a 60% increase in production. In addition to that, obviously, line utilization is up year-over-year. They're down a little for the quarter, but customers are actively managing their balance sheets, investing in their business, and still have a positive point of view or positive view of the economy, and so we'd expect that activity to continue. One place where we are seeing the impact of interest rates is in the investor real estate portfolio. While we're seeing growth in multi-family as a result of previous commitments that are funding, the level of new activity is slowing because of rising cost and difficulty to make the economics of those transactions work.

That's something we'll look for in future quarters to have an impact on loan growth. But in general, business sentiment is still good.

All right, perfect. Thank you very much. I appreciate the color.

Our next question comes from line of Erika Najarian with UBS. Please proceed with your question.

Morning. I noticed that slide that you usually have in terms of where your NIM is against the Fed funds background isn't in the third quarter slide. As we think about the rate curve and as you think about your confidence in NIB growth optimization and beta, I'm wondering how we should think about the path of the net interest margin from 3.70% exit as we contemplate two to three rate hikes over the next 12 months.

Yeah. We removed that slide, given that slide was really focused for the full year and given we gave you the fourth quarter guide. We just didn't feel that slide was as necessary. I'll address your question. Won't go too far to give 2027 guidance, but we indicated we expect to exit the fourth quarter around a 3.70% margin. So when we look forward into 2027, some of the structural tailwinds that we have will continue into 2027. So fixed asset repricing will continue. We quoted that to be 100-125 basis points in the fourth quarter. That will continue into the future at a lower rate as we go through time. It's still a benefit. We expect the balance sheet to continue to grow into 2027.

As long as we continue to generate good non-interest-bearing deposits, maintain our deposit beta in the mid to high 30s as rate increases, that will continue to support expansion in both net interest income and the margin into 2027.

Very clear. Just to follow up on Ryan's question on capital. Congratulations, by the way, on Allen being your new Treasurer. He's great. As we think about rates being higher for longer on the belly of the curve, obviously you bought back $95 million this quarter. How should we think about your priorities in terms of buybacks versus protecting capital? You mentioned TCE. I'm wondering, Moody's has come out with tougher language for your larger bank peers. There's a release in Bank of America yesterday. How much are they starting to assert themselves if more in terms of the conversation about capital?

Yes. Our conversations about capital with the rating agencies have been positive. We've been very clear with how we think about regulatory capital, TCE. So our capital priorities are unchanged. We have strong capital generation. We're mindful of the interest rate environment. It's just good to remind ourselves over the past 10 years, we've seen 11 quarters when the 10-year treasury has increased or decreased more than 50 basis points. So we saw a big move this quarter, but we need to remind ourselves that large moves can happen. So it's one of the reasons why we're so active in making sure that our hedging program factors that in. So you see on the slide in our appendix, the fair value hedges that we put on this quarter to protect capital in a potential rising rate environment. So we'll continue to execute strategies like that to protect capital.

But because of that and the capital generation that we have, we still think our capital priorities are unchanged. With respect to the TCE ratio, I have commented on this before, but the inclusion of cash flow hedges in that calculation, I think, is meaningful. For us, that is the core of our franchise value is our deposit base. And so being able to maintain that duration, and capitalize on that through time, through revenue, is important for us. And so we will make sure that we make good risk management decisions around that. But the TCE ratio really only reflecting one side of that trade, if you will, we think is a big disadvantage of that ratio.

So we think the changes to regulatory capital, those make sense, and we will monitor TCE, but the inclusion of cash flow hedges is one that I think I would not want to impact how we risk manage our balance sheet.

Our next question comes from the line of Ebrahim Poonawala with Bank of America. Please proceed with your question.

Good morning, John and Anil. How are you? Just talk to us about from a deposit growth standpoint. I think, John, you shared some stats in your remarks, I believe, earlier. But as we think about deposit growth and bringing in new customers, what seems to [audio distortion] doing more to sort of deepen the relationship? Similarly on the consumer side, because all we hear is competitive dynamics, a lot of promotions from non-market banks in the Southeast. If you don't mind shedding some color around how should we think about lower cost core deposit growth from here?

Yeah, it is our focus, and we're dedicated our consumer banking teams to focus on acquiring the new customer checking households and new small business checking households. Our commercial bankers are focused on winning new logos, new middle-market business, and that really is our objective. We're using feet on the street to do that by and large. We think we're in really great markets. We continue to recruit a lot of wonderful bankers. We are enabling them with a lot of really good technology, provides insights about customers and prospects, and we're focused on execution. As a result of that, we're growing consumer checking accounts, we're growing small business checking accounts, and that's really the core of the business, right? As we deepen those relationships through providing customers with debit cards, with credit cards, with equity lines of credit and/or mortgages, investment products.

On the other side, small businesses with treasury management, payment capabilities, and sometimes credit. Those are relationship-deepening activities. I think we've talked about growth in treasury management penetration rates up over 7%. Again, that's a focus on helping customers manage the cash flow in their business, manage the cash in their business, and also take advantage of emerging new payments products that really help their businesses and help speed up cash flow as assets converge. I think our team's doing a really nice job, and we're seeing that in household growth. We feel good about what that will mean over time as those customers activate their accounts, use their cards, and do other things that result in more deposit balances coming to the bank.

Ibby, I'll just add to that. We really understand the nature of our deposit base and our deposit customers. We're very proud of the 30-ish percent of our deposit base that's non-interest bearing. Even that interest-bearing portion, we understand the rate-seeking behavior of that population. We're able to test into that population and grow deposits in a very targeted fashion. This is where being in some of the best growth markets in the country works to our advantage because we can do very targeted opportunities and offers to grow deposits in that bucket that we have very well defined and add to our deposit base while still protecting the non-interest-bearing deposit base, as John just alluded to.

The other thing, I'd just make a point. We've grown our mass affluent customer base by about 8% year-over-year, and 85% of those customers come from our own customer base. We're acquiring younger customers, we believe, based upon information provided by industry sources at about 3x the rate that many of our peers are. We're converting those customers over time to be more mass affluent in nature. As a result, their balances and their relationships grow. So, a really important part of our strategy, and I think producing really good results.

That's an interesting stat on the younger customers, so thanks for sharing all that color. One quick question, you didn't mention AI. Mostly in terms of, we've heard some of your peers talk about redirecting tech investment towards cyber risk because of AI. Just talk to us, how big of a lift is that, and just how all of that is informing your concern around cyber threats. I mean, not just to Regions, but obviously the entire system, yeah.

Yeah, absolutely. So investing in cyber defense has always been something very critical for us, and it's even more heightened in today's environment. We are actively participating across many different industry consortiums to ensure that our cyber defense protocols are advancing as this technology evolves. To your point, it does involve meaningful expense, both new expense and redirection of existing associates, and that's embedded in our cost base. We do expect that to continue through time. It's the new reality that we live in today. We're definitely front and center with that.

Our CISO is actively involved with her counterparts across the industry, and we have a great team working to make sure that our customers can continue to have the trust in us that we know is incredibly valuable to them. That is an important investment that we will constantly make to make sure that trust is maintained. And we're able to monitor in terms of how AI is being used across different platforms, so we can track activity and how it may impact our deposit base. We're seeing very low traffic through that channel.

We'll continue to monitor that. We've talked before about while we don't believe that's a meaningful threat to our deposit base, but we can monitor that as well. But to your point, it's an important investment, broadly speaking, that we need to make as a company and one that we'll absolutely continue to do.

Our next question comes from the line of Ken Usdin with Autonomous Research. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, good morning. One question on betas. You mentioned that you still expect that the cumulative betas in this upcycle to be in the mid to upper 30s, and last cycle they were higher than that. I am just wondering just what the difference is, and what you can tell us about either the mix of deposits or the granularity of the deposit base that gives you that continued confidence that you can kind of keep it in that much better than peer range. Thanks.

Yeah. One point of differentiation is the magnitude of the change before. I think it drove a higher beta. What gives us confidence is really that granularity of understanding the nature of our deposit base. Not just thinking about it "in aggregate", but understanding that we have a portion of our customer base that is 100% beta, and we understand and can back test to see how that changes through time. By actively monitoring betas across different cohorts, if you will, of our deposit base and tracking that and seeing the consistency of performance, that is what really gives us confidence in our guide looking forward.

I think too, Ken, just embedded in the numbers were maybe some of the data I shared about our growing deposits, intentionally growing deposits, interest-bearing deposits in 2022 and 2023. You might remember that was a period of time when banks were actively seeking deposit growth. There was a lot of pressure on deposits. At that time, as I mentioned, we grew CDs by $7 billion and money market deposits by $4 billion. As a result, the deposit beta was higher at 44%, as I recall.

Yeah. To your remixing point, as you would expect, as rates have moved higher, our kind of starting point today does have some of that remixing already baked into it.

Okay. Got it. On the loan book, I think we are just from here, is the loan book kind of just all moving the same direction? You have kind of gotten past all those runoff books, I believe for the most part. Is it kind of just like business as usual from here and just really depending on the environment and what you're facing in terms of the consumer and commercial sides of the business?

Yes. I think if you look at loan growth over the quarter, consumer loan growth has been a little bit of a headwind. Since a good bit of our consumer loan balances are in the mortgage portfolio, shouldn't expect to see a lot of growth in consumer loans, if any growth over the next quarter, two, three, depending upon where rates are. On the other side, our wholesale business grew significantly. If you look at H.8 data, we grew a little faster than the H.8 data in the corporate banking business. So we feel good about the path of loan growth from here. To your point, it should be business as usual, absent the impact on the consumer business from rates.

I'll just point, in the quarter, we saw really nice growth in IRE as well, up about 2.4%. As you look towards where rates may go in the future, that will be a kind of a governor as to how much growth we see there in terms of what may go to the capital markets if rates level out a little bit. But to John's point, we're really proud of the growth that we're seeing. When you break it down portfolio by portfolio, we think the comparison to H.8 data is kind of reaffirming our belief that we're growing as our markets grow.

Our next question comes from the line of John Pancari with Evercore ISI. Please proceed with your question.

Morning. On the security side, I know you had mentioned that you will continue to review actions to manage your interest rate sensitivity. I know you further repositioned the securities book this quarter, $845 million or so. Can you just talk to us about potential further actions there to adjust your rate sensitivity via the securities book and other actions that you are taking as part of that expectation to manage rates?

Yeah. So we are going to maintain the discipline that you have seen from us in terms of looking at the return profile of those transactions. That $850 million that we executed this quarter, that $15 million loss had about a two-year payback on that. We have been consistent with thinking about that from a payback of less than three years, and we will do that through time. As rates move around, we are constantly evaluating any opportunities. As securities pull closer to maturity, the lack of liquidity benefit also provides opportunity there. Wouldn't expect to see too much given what we are seeing right now, but given our history, you should expect us to continue to manage. Regarding the overall securities portfolio, we feel good about the size and composition of where it sits right now.

We'll continue to manage the risk from interest rates, as I mentioned before, through continuing to use fair value swaps on securities to make sure that we're monitoring capital risk. Then we feel good about our mix of HTM right now at about 16%. We'll monitor that through time. All in all, feel like we're well-positioned in this rate environment.

Okay. Great. Thanks. Then separately on the credit side, credit trends were particularly solid and improved a bit this quarter. Just given the move in rates and the inflationary concerns and macro volatility out there, any signs of erosion that you're seeing, early signs worth flagging? I know your ACL ratio bumped down a little bit this quarter. Is it fair to assume that likely stable from here, just given the backdrop? Or do you think you're probably going to see that compress incrementally? Thanks.

Yeah. No, we think stable from here, John. Based on what we know, we think the net charge-off range, based on the composition of our portfolio, is somewhere between 40 and 50 basis points. We're still working on a few large credits that we had identified as problems in those portfolios of interest. How and when they get resolved will impact results and could increase charge-offs modestly in a given quarter. But for the year, we would expect charge-offs within the 40-50 basis point range, and likely at the low end of that range. We think we see stability from here forward. A little weakness in the multifamily business, primarily in Texas, just as a geography, some softness in absorption rates. But otherwise, and we continue to watch office and transportation, given the things that are still impacting those portfolios, but they have improved.

Obviously, you see that in our results, and we would expect, as I said, stability from here.

Yeah, I would just point you maybe to three things as you think about the allowance from here. As John mentioned, there are a couple credits that we are still monitoring. They are fully reserved for. So if they charge off over time, you should expect us to reduce the allowance by a like amount. Continue to look at the economic environment. Clearly, that's something that could be variable, and so we will keep an eye on that. Then also, just as importantly is the origination profile. We have talked a lot about investment-grade credits, and so just mathematically, if that should continue into the future, we don't need to hold as much reserves against those, given the better credit risk. So that could play out just in terms of the math as the ratio moves from here.

Our next question comes from the line of David Chiaverini with Jefferies. Please proceed with your question.

Hi. Good morning. Thanks for taking the question. Wanted to ask about capital markets and the outlook. You are guiding $90 million-$105 million. I was curious as to your expectation in terms of with the higher rate backdrop, the extent to which this could impact your CRE customers. Are you seeing any impact at all thus far?

Well, it has had an impact on the business over the last, call it 12-18 months. We did have a good quarter in the third quarter across all components of our capital markets business, including the real estate business. We have a couple of transactions that actually could go to the secondary market and on the verge, depending on what happens with rates over the next few weeks. We are guiding to $90 million-$105 million, and we think that's a solid range. If those transactions work, maybe it's on the upper end of that range. But today, we would say somewhere between $90 million and $105 million is where we ought to end the quarter.

Got it. Thanks for that. On the expense side and the cloud-based deposit platform, remind us, is there any change in timing in terms of when you expect that to be completed? Can you refresh us on your latest thoughts on the M&A front?

Sure. On the deposit system platform, we will begin a pilot of associates, friends, and family, so to speak, in the next week or two. Assuming that goes well, we will start a larger pilot in the first quarter of 2027. Our intention is to convert customers over time in 2027, completing sometime toward the end of the second quarter into the third quarter of 2027. All that is on track at the moment. In terms of M&A, our position is unchanged. We have said we are not interested in depository M&A. We have a really good plan. We continue to execute our plan. We can deliver top quartile, top decile results based on return on tangible common equity as a primary metric. We think that that's still very achievable. We have this project going on. It is consuming everyone's attention internally.

It's likely the largest technology project we've done. We're effectively converting ourselves. So we need to get through that project before we think about M&A. I would say that when we get through it, we'll have a lot of the conversation about our interest. But today, because I think we'll have some capabilities that will position us well if we wanted to participate. But today, we are not a candidate to participate in depository M&A.

Our next question comes from the line of Matt O'Connor with Deutsche Bank. Please proceed with your question.

Good morning. I was just hoping you could talk about the wealth fees. Sorry if I missed it earlier, but they were down a little bit Q-Q, up just 5% year-over-year. Obviously, equities have been strong, but remind us how impacted they are by equity levels versus fixed income and maybe just versus other things that might be in there, like annuity sales or just some of the moving pieces. Thanks.

Yeah. I'd break the drivers into two buckets. First, to your point, is just portfolio composition. Looking at both equities and bonds, I'd say drives around 40%-50% of the overall performance of the business. But most importantly, production within our financial advisors is what drives the growth as well. This is a place where we've really been committed to investing. This business has done very well for us. You've seen us post record quarters in prior quarters. This quarter, we ticked down just a little bit. Still seeing good production and expect that to return. But as you think about the drivers of revenue, I'd break it into those buckets.

Regions Financial (RF) Q3 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Company Participants