Almost $20 trillion in revenue—and a record-breaking $1.87 trillion in profits. Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive list of the biggest companies in America.

Fortune 500

The 300 companies on this year’s list brought in over $12.6 trillion in revenue for the latest 12 months, with the median revenue figure at $22 billion.

America's Most Innovative Companies

The Fortune 500, in its 70th year in 2024, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

The 200 companies on this list are transforming industries from the inside out.

The 300 companies on this list are transforming industries from the inside out.

The Fortune 500, in its 69th year in 2023, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 68th running of the list.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 67th running of the list.

Regions offers consumer and commercial banking, mortgage services, and wealth management to clients in the South, Midwest, and Texas.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 66th running of the list.

F500-2020-446-Regions-Financial

This Alabama-based company’s subsidiary bank has about 1,400 offices and a 2,000-ATM network in the Southeast, Midwest, and Texas.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 65th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 64th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 63rd running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 62nd running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 61st running of the list. Wal-Mart claims the top spot again. See who made the list.

Wal-Mart stayed on top as its sales crept closer to half-a-trillion dollars. Apple moved into the top five. And UnitedHealth Group continued its steady climb. 

Sector

Culture rank

Process rank

Product rank

Years on list

Previous rank

Key Financials (last Fiscal Year)

Revenues ($M)

Profits ($M)

Assets ($M)

Total Stockholder Equity ($M)

Profit Ratios

Profit as % of Revenues

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholder Equity

Earnings Per Share (last Fiscal Year)

Earnings Per Share ($)

EPS % Change (from prior fiscal year)

EPS % Change (5 year annual rate)

EPS % Change (10 year annual rate)

Total Return

Total Return to Investors (last year)

Total Return to Investors (5 year, annualized)

Total Return to Investors (10 year, annualized)

Regions Financial Corporation is one of the largest full-service providers of consumer and commercial banking, wealth management, and mortgage products and services in the United States. Founded in 1971 after the merger of three Alabama banks, the company is a member of the S&amp;P 500 Index and serves as one of the largest banks in America. Regions operates through three segments to offer clients and organizations in the South, the Midwest, and Texas banking services and wealth management.

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Q4 2024

Regions Financial (RF): Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings

legacy

Regions Financial

regions financial

Good morning, and welcome to the Regions Financial Corporation's Quarterly Earnings Call. My name is Chris, and I'll be your operator for today's call. I will now turn the call over to Dana Nolan to begin.

Thank you, Chris. Welcome to Regions' first quarter earnings call. John and David will provide high level commentary regarding our results. Earnings documents, which include our forward looking statement disclaimer and non GAAP reconciliations, are available in the Investor Relations section of our website. These disclosures cover our presentation materials, today's prepared remarks and Q and A.

Thank you, Dana, and good morning, everyone. We appreciate you joining our call today. Earlier this morning, we reported strong quarterly earnings of $465,000,000 resulting in earnings per share of $0.51 and adjusted earnings of $487,000,000 and adjusted earnings per share of $0.54 We delivered pretax pre provision income of $745,000,000 a 21% increase year over year and we generated a return on tangible common equity of 18%. We're pleased with our performance and believe we are well prepared to face the current market uncertainty. At Regions, we remain committed to our long standing strategic priorities of soundness, profitability and growth.

These priorities support our ability to generate consistent, sustainable long term performance. They're also the foundation underpinning our decade long plus journey to transform our bank. Over the last ten plus years, we have strengthened our soundness through enhancements to our interest rate risk, credit risk and capital and liquidity management frameworks, while fortifying our operational and compliance practices to support growth. We meaningfully improved our profitability through diversifying our revenue streams, focusing on appropriate risk adjusted returns and disciplined expense management. And over the last five years, we have generated top quartile organic loan and deposit growth, while continuing to make investments in talent, technology, products and services to further grow our business.

These efforts have contributed to significant improvement in our return on tangible common equity. In 2015, our return was in the bottom quartile. In each of the last four years, we delivered the highest return on tangible common equity among our peers. Additionally, we've generated top quartile earnings per share growth and over both a five ten year period. Our derisking efforts and best in class hedging program have contributed to a strong capital position.

This is evident in the most recent CCAR stress test results as our projected post stress capital degradation was well below the peer median. And our pretax pre provision income coverage of projected stress losses was the highest among our peers. We believe our robust capital balances and strong organic capital generation position us well to perform across an array of potential economic conditions. Our enviable footprint provides us with both a low cost and granular core deposit base as well as favorable growth opportunities from our high growth priority markets. This benefit coupled with our proven strategic plan and experienced team with a record of successful execution leads us to feel good about our positioning for 2025 and beyond.

With respect to 2025, our outlook for unemployment has increased and there is an expectation for pronounced slowdown in GDP growth. But at present, our base case does not include a recession. Our clients remain optimistic that the economy will improve, but current conditions have created uncertainty, which has caused many of our clients to delay investments. Importantly, we remain well positioned to generate consistent results and support our clients regardless of the market backdrop and economic conditions. With that, I'll hand it over to David to provide some highlights regarding the quarter.

Thank you, John. Let's start with the balance sheet. Average loans remained relatively stable quarter over quarter, while ending loans declined 1%. Within the business portfolio, average loans remained stable as customers continue to carry excess liquidity and utilization rates remain below historic levels. Although pipelines and commitments continue to trend higher versus this time last year, it is too early to assess the full impact tariffs will ultimately have on loan demand.

However, as John indicated, customers are delaying investment decisions pending further clarity. Average consumer loans decreased approximately 1% in the first quarter as lower seasonal production contributed to declines in home improvement finance and residential mortgage. Given the near term economic uncertainty, we now expect full year 2025 average loans to be relatively stable versus 2024. From a deposit standpoint, average deposit balances grew 1% linked quarter and ending balances increased 3%. The growth is consistent with normal seasonal tax trends and is also reflective of customer preference for liquidity amid the uncertain environment.

We've experienced favorable performance in both core and priority markets with good participation in our money market offers, which boosted interest bearing deposits. Despite this, we remain at our expected mix in the low 30s as a percent of non interest bearing to total deposits and believe this profile will remain relatively stable in the coming quarters. In the second quarter, we expect average deposit balances to be roughly flat, reflecting tax outflows in April, offset by existing relationship deepening and new customer acquisition, particularly in our priority markets. Should cautiousness persist among clients, we could experience somewhat higher commercial balances in the near term. But under our current baseline for the full year 2025, we expect average deposits to be stable to modestly higher when compared to 2024.

This reflects modest growth in consumer deposits, partially offset by some incremental deployment of excess liquidity by corporate clients later in the year. Let's shift to net interest income. Net interest income declined 3% linked quarter, but declined less than 1% excluding the impact of nonrecurring items and day count. Excluding these factors, the decline in net interest income is mostly driven by lower loan balances and less origination fee activity as customers wait for more clarity in the operating environment. Additionally, a tight lending spread environment created a modest headwind.

The benefits from lower deposit cost and hedging have protected the margin during the falling rate cycle. Our ability to manage funding costs lower while also growing deposit balances in the quarter further highlights the strength of Regions' deposit advantage. Linked quarter, interest bearing deposit costs fell by 11 basis points, representing a full falling rate interest bearing deposit beta of 32%. Further, the March exit rate for the quarter shows our ability for ongoing deposit cost reduction from time deposit maturities and repricing, which imply a mid-thirty percent deposit beta. Finally, we took advantage of yield curve and spread dynamics that provided for a less than three year payback on an additional securities portfolio repositioning.

Currently, we have limited remaining repositioning opportunities that meet our interest rate risk and capital management objectives. However, we will continue to evaluate as conditions warrant. After declining in the first quarter, net interest income is expected to grow approximately 3% in the second quarter as the overhang from day count and other nonrecurring items abate. Additionally, we believe that fixed rate loan and securities turnover in the prevailing rate environment and improving deposit cost trends will drive net interest income higher over the remainder of the year. Full year 2025 net interest income is now projected to grow between 14% with a reduction in the range driven by the evolving macroeconomic and interest rate environment.

While only a small amount of loan growth from here is necessary to support the midpoint of our guidance, the potential for accelerating growth later in the year provides opportunity to achieve the higher end of the range. Now let's take a look at fee revenue performance during the quarter. Adjusted noninterest income remained stable linked quarter as growth in most categories, including new records in both treasury and wealth management revenue, was offset by lower capital markets. The decline in capital markets was driven primarily by lower M and A, real estate capital markets and loan syndication activity. We continue to believe that over time and in a more favorable environment, our capital markets business can consistently generate quarterly revenue of approximately $100,000,000 benefiting from investments we have made and capabilities and talent.

However, we expect it will continue to run around $80,000,000 to $90,000,000 in the near term. Due to heightened uncertainty and market volatility, we currently expect full year 2025 adjusted noninterest income to grow between 13% versus 2024. Let's move on to noninterest expense. Adjusted noninterest expense increased approximately 1% compared to the prior quarter, driven primarily by 1% increase in salaries and benefits, which included one month of merit as well as the reset of payroll taxes and four zero one matching. The seasonal increase in salaries and benefits came in lower than originally anticipated, attributable to lower headcount and incentive based compensation.

The company's planned investments in talent, primarily in our priority markets, remains underway. We expect second quarter salaries and benefits expense to be up modestly compared to the first quarter. We have a well established history of prudently managing expenses across various economic conditions. As our outlook for revenue in 2025 has come down, we now expect full year 2025 adjusted noninterest expense to also come down to be flat to up approximately 2%. Despite these revisions, we remain committed to generating full year positive operating leverage in the 5,150 basis point range.

Regarding asset quality, provision expense was approximately equal to net charge offs at $124,000,000 The resulting allowance for credit losses ratio increased two basis points to 1.81% based on conditions at quarter end. Declines related to specific reserves and portfolio changes were offset by increases associated with economic deterioration and qualitative adjustments reflecting more uncertainty in the economic environment. Annualized net charge offs as a percentage of average loans increased three basis points to 52 basis points, driven primarily by previously identified portfolios of interest. Non performing loans as a percent of total loans decreased eight basis points to 88 basis points, modestly below our historical range, while Business Services criticized loans increased by 4%. Our through the cycle net charge off expectations are unchanged and remain between forty and fifty basis points.

We continue to expect full year net charge offs to be towards the higher end of the range attributable primarily to loans within our previously identified portfolios of interest. We do expect losses to be elevated in the first half of the year, but importantly, we have reserve for losses associated with these portfolios. Let's turn to capital and liquidity. We ended the quarter with an estimated common equity Tier one ratio of 10.8, while executing $242,000,000 in share repurchases and paying $226,000,000 in common dividends during the quarter. When adjusted to include AOCI, common equity Tier one increased from 8.8% to an estimated 9.1% from the fourth to the first quarter, attributable to strong capital generation and a reduction in long term interest rates.

We continue to execute transactions to better manage this volatility. Towards the end of the first quarter, we transferred an additional $1,000,000,000 of available for sale securities to held to maturity. And in early April, we transferred another $1,000,000,000 increasing our current mix of HTM to total securities to approximately 20%. In the near term, we expect to manage common equity Tier one inclusive of AOCI closer to the lower end of our 9.25 to 9.75% operating range. This should provide meaningful capital flexibility to meet proposed and evolving regulatory changes while supporting strategic growth objectives and allowing us to continue to increase the dividend and repurchase shares commensurate with earnings.

This covers our prepared remarks. We'll now move to the Q and A portion of the call.

Thank you. We will now be conducting a question and answer session. Our first question comes from the line of Scott Siefers with Piper Sandler. Please proceed with your question.

Morning, everybody. Thanks for taking the question.

you could sort of give us your sense for the degree to which things, at least your perception, regarding the degree to which things will need to settle down before customers are willing to reengage with things like, investments or other strategic decisions, and if there's any difference in how you would look at it for, you know, traditional commercial lending versus, your capital markets businesses, etcetera?

I don't know that I can put a degree of settling down on it, so to speak. But clearly, the volatility and uncertainty has customers in sort of a wait and see mode. I do think as it becomes more clear what the nature of the tariffs will be, what products they'll be applied to, what countries and to what degree the customers can be more certain about the potential impacts. We're also following and talked a lot about this, but we're also following the changes in immigration policy and changes in regulation and the impact on businesses. We've had the opportunity over the last six weeks to visit with more than 60% of our Corporate Banking Group customers, non real estate related, and, have a pretty good sense of their frame of mind.

I would say customers are still optimistic, but very much in a wait and see mode.

Scott, I'd add to kind of, yes, the second part of that question on capital markets. We had a little bit of activity that picked up when the ten year came to the lower 4%, actually dipped, I think we were at 3.88% for a short period of time. And those lower rates is really what you need to help drive a little bit more activity in that space.

Okay. Thank you. And then maybe David, when

you think about the lower expense growth rate for the year, can you maybe put a little more context around how much of that is just sort of naturally lower cost due to less revenue driven activity and versus how much might be actual cuts or delays to investments, things like that? Just I'm trying to get a sense for the balance in there.

Yes. So we had the seasonal increase. We were able to offset that a bit because of lower headcount. We also had some retirements that happened in of the fourth quarter, the very beginning of the first quarter that we benefited from that will be ongoing. That's helping us offset investments we have already made and will continue to make in terms of the additional hires that we had mentioned for our growth market.

So we have a schedule in the back, I think it's on Page 19 in the deck, that shows the investments we want to make in all three of our segments to grow, in particular, in our priority markets. And so our whole point has been we're going to control cost, but we and we need to make investments to grow. We have to find those savings somewhere else. We've been able to do that by controlling headcount in other areas. We've leveraged technology incrementally better.

We still have a ways to go there. So it's it's really not it's not holding off on investments. It's finding the cost elsewhere in the in the in the business.

Yeah. Okay. Perfect. Thank you both very much.

next question comes from the line of John Pancari with Evercore. Please proceed with your question.

Good morning, guys. Good morning. To the loan side, I know you bumped your guidance lower and you just gave a little bit of color just around the customers

in kind of a wait and see mode. Can you give us a little bit more detail there? What are you seeing in terms of line utilization? Was there any pre tariff drawdown that you saw that could be more of a pull forward? And then separately, are there any areas of growth that you're seeing that could be the main drivers of loan growth here amid this uncertainty?

Yes. So John, we did see during the quarter, I guess, our pipelines are, I'll call them, a bit mixed. I think the activity in sort of the upper end of the middle market and smaller corporate customer space is pretty soft. Customers were able to access the secondary market. During the first quarter, we had almost $800,000,000 in paydowns from customers who went to the bond market, raised capital and reduced their outstandings with the bank.

So, that sector has been and the opportunity there is fairly soft. Within the middle market customer space and in real estate, we're beginning to see pipelines expanding a bit. And so those customers are more interested in making investments we think, and that likely will continue. The issue is primarily an understanding of what the impact of tariffs will be on cost of projects and other things, but we'll follow that more closely. Line utilization is still flat.

We're not seeing any borrowings to facilitate increasing inventories. And in fact, customers are still carrying a tremendous amount of liquidity on their balance sheets. We've seen a significant growth in what I'll call wholesale deposits, both on balance sheet and off balance sheet. And I think until customers begin using that liquidity, it's not likely we see any real increase in borrowings underlines of credit.

Great. All right. Thanks, John. And then and I guess just separately on the capital front, your CET1 is solid at ten point eight percent and nine point one percent, including ASCI. You bought back about $242,000,000 this quarter.

Can you just help us think about the pace of buyback as we look out through the rest of the year? Do you think that as growth remains muted that actually facilitate the higher pace of buybacks? Or could the pressure to growth mean a still weaker economic outlook and therefore, you could be more cautious in terms of buybacks longer term? So just want to get that how you're thinking about that trade off.

Yeah. John, I think it's along the lines of, the the first thing you mentioned. You know, we have our capital where we need to be, right at it. We said even after AOCI impact, we would be at the lower end of our range. We're generating 40 basis points of capital, every quarter.

We want to continue to pay our dividend, even be able to increase that appropriately. And then, we really use our capital to support our business, support our customers and make loans. And if there's not a lot of demand for loans, then the expectation is we use that capital to buy it back. And so we leaned into that a little bit with the $242,000,000 in the quarter. And, to the extent we continue to earn what we think we can earn, you should expect us to lean into buybacks until we start to see, loan growth.

We're confident in the amount of capital that we have to support our business under any economic scenario. So there's no need to be ultra conservative with regards to that. So I think buybacks would be in order for us.

Great. All right, David. Thank you for that.

next question comes from the line of Ebrahim Poonawala with Bank of America. Please proceed with your question.

Good morning. Guess maybe David just sticking with the capital. So we did some, I think, bond book restructuring this quarter, payback two point seven years. Just give us a sense, is there more juice to go there in terms of restructuring more bonds? And like how are you thinking about that today versus buybacks?

Yes. So, we have mentioned now for two quarters that we thought we were kind of hit the end of the line in terms of being able to do that. And we really have targeted, and it's arbitrary, but we've targeted a payback of three years or less. We really didn't think we had much left to do going into the quarter. The rate environment changed pretty abruptly for us and gave us an opportunity to do another small fairly small slug of that.

And so we're, again, gonna reiterate, we think we're kinda at the end of the line. But if the market gives us the opportunity to do that, again, we go through the math of looking at what's better for you to do a securities repositioning, take the loss or buy your shares back. And that's really the calculus. And if we continue to see opportunities to do, repositioning that's better than buyback, we will do so. It's just I think that's gonna be a harder harder calculation to come back.

We we have a we have a little bit left, but not just not much.

Understood. And maybe, John, just back to we saw we've seen a dramatic change in customer sentiment today versus January. As we think about customers that are on pause right now, we're trying to figure out whether the next move is higher or into a recession. How quickly, like, do you think activity could pick up? Means, what do you what are you hearing from the customers around tariff clarity that they need where you could actually see like, is it realistic that thirty, sixty, ninety days from now, growth could be much better than expected?

Or is this gonna take a lot longer given what we've been through over the last thirty or sixty days?

Well, I I think some stability. More likely, ninety days than thirty is would be important for customers to act. Is it maybe ninety more days than that? So ninety days to six months is probably more likely. But I do think, people are looking for a period of some stability, and that probably is a minimum of ninety days.

And just following up on that, you have markets where you have pretty significant manufacturing plants tied to the auto sector. Any impact you've seen right now, either good or bad, because of the auto tariffs?

Not yet. Not yet. We really have not seen any significant impact associated with the tariffs to date nor immigration policy changes, but we are monitoring all those things, obviously.

Our next question comes from the line of Matt O'Connor with Deutsche Bank. Please proceed with your question.

service charge line grew nicely year over year and then also linked quarter where normally there's some seasonal pressure. So just talk about that. I think there's both treasury management and the consumer overdraft is one big driver. So if you could touch on that.

I mean we continue to grow customer accounts, customer checking accounts, and more accounts are going to have more service charges. We do have a little bit of seasonality that comes in the service charge line item on the corporate side, and that's always a bit helpful in that in first quarter. But, all of our, income lines on the noninterest revenue, very we're all increasing with exception of capital markets, which is where we had the biggest challenge. And we expect that non interest revenue, sources to be fairly stable to growing throughout 2025 ex the, cap markets challenges.

Yes. I'd just add, Matt, to reiterate David's point, growth in consumer checking accounts, growth in small business checking accounts are a driver of service charge income. We grew treasury management relationships by 9% last year, and you're seeing the benefits of that manifested in increased treasury management revenue. And we would expect to continue to have that sort of success growing treasury management relationships as we expand our commercial and corporate banking businesses across our growing footprint.

Okay. That's helpful. And then just on the consumer overdraft fees, there's obviously been some relief over what could have happened in terms of caps? And just thoughts on that going forward. Obviously, it's been a drag for kind of multiple years from you guys, but opportunities for that to grow maybe beyond account growth from here?

Well, you know, we've made a lot of changes in our overdraft practices and services that we offer customers, including early pay, a twenty four hour grace period, established de minimis levels for overdrafts and maximum number of transactions. All those things have had an impact on overdraft revenue, and that's a positive from our perspective. We want to provide that service to customers, but we prefer they not use it. To the extent they do, then we are generating some revenue associated with it. It grew modestly quarter over quarter.

We're still seeing about the same percentage of customers' access overdrafts. So it's not a, we're not seeing a growing number of customers, I guess, be the point using overdrafts. It really is more a reflection, I think, of the overall number of accounts that we are opening. And, as a result, some additional revenue is being generated.

Our next question comes from the line of Erika Najarian with UBS. Please proceed with your question.

Hi. My first question is, as we think about what the reserve is capturing in terms of unemployment rate, David, could you give us a sense on what the current baseline is and what the weighted average, may be?

Yes. We do so we do our calculation a little differently. If you go look at and I'm getting what page is on to Page 29, it'll show you what our unemployment expectations are for the next, sorry, what's that page? Is that right page? About 4.2, four point three percent.

We also have a qualitative component, and embedded in that qualitative component is is trying to think what that a piece of that is, what the unemployment rate could go to. When you weight all that down, we're in the high 4% range as far as the unemployment that's embedded in our current allowance that we have at the end of the quarter.

Got it. Yes. As we think about the allowance going forward, given how you've told us your charge offs will trend over this year, there are clearly some already identified issues that you're working through, which would imply a release of those associated reserves. But clearly the macro outlook has, is murkier given the tariff policy. So how should we think about, the potential of modest loan growth coming back, the resolution of those previously identified problem credits and then just like a who knows, environment as we think about your ACL going forward?

Yes. I think so if you look on Page 31 where we show our allowance relative to our kind of day one CECL back to the fourth quarter of twenty nineteen, first opening quarter of '20 '20, we show you kind of what those reserves that's in a benign environment. We clearly have more reserves today because we have to take care of some of our, problem assets in those portfolios of interest. And that's why we expect higher charge offs in the first half of the year and lower in the back half. And as you see that, you should have an expectation, all the things being equal and the economy doesn't drift further away, that the allowance coverage ought to be coming down.

We've given you a pro form a as to what the loss rates would look like with our current portfolio is if it were adopted on the first day of CECL, and it's a one sixty two. So what you ought to see is that one eighty one that we have today drift down more towards that in a normal environment, the pace of which we can't tell you because we don't know what the the economic environment's gonna be. But those higher charge offs coming through, this year, just directionally, you should expect the January to be lower as time goes by unless the economy falls apart.

next question comes from the line of Gerard Cassidy with RBC. Please proceed with your question.

David, Ken, just want to clarify an answer in that last question on Slide 30, your economic outlook with the unemployment rate. That's if I recall, those are the economic statistics for your region, your footprint rather than the country. Am I correct in remembering that?

Okay. I just because your numbers are gonna be different than what we're hearing from others. I wanna make sure people knew that. Coming back to your CECL comment with the reserves, how challenging do you think it's going to be convincing the regulators and the rating agencies of what you pointed out the way the math works and the CECL, how those reserves should come down. Any thoughts there?

Well, I mean, we we think we're pretty expert at knowing what allowance we need to have. Obviously, we get challenged by rating agencies, regulators, or independent auditors. But we have a pretty good process in place that's consistently applied. And, just directionally, what I said has to happen over time. I think your what's embedded in your question, Gerard, is the pace the pace of that improvement and coming down.

And I don't think we're going to get to 01/1962 until we see, things really settle down and we have clarity and the economy's kind of moving along like it's like it's capable of. So, I don't wanna assert that we're going to one sixty two next quarter or even this year. I'm just saying that, know, with a higher charge offs, with an eight one 80 one allowance, if you're fully reserved for the charge off, that number mathematically has to come down all other things being equal.

Certainly. Got it. And then one other follow-up just on credit. You guys, you know, coming out of the pandemic identified some of the ongoing portfolios, surveillance portfolios like transportation, trucking. As we move forward in a slower growth environment, are you have you identified any other portfolios that you're keeping extra attention to outside of what you've already identified from the pandemic area?

Are there any portfolios in particular that you look at?

Yeah. I would say I'd say retail trade, manufacturing, particularly related to consumer durables. I think we'll have to watch the consumer and and, where they're spending or not. And those will be areas that we follow with some interest. Construction would be another area with potential impacts on rising costs above and beyond what we've already experienced.

next question comes from the line of Christopher Spar with Wells Fargo. Please proceed with your question.

Regions Financial (RF) Q1 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Company Participants