The companies on the Global 500 employ 70.2 million people, and their revenue represents more than one-third of the world’s GDP.

Fortune Global 500

With a combined revenue of $21 trillion and $2.1 trillion in profits, the 2026 Fortune 500 is the definitive list of America's largest companies.

Fortune 500

The corporations on our annual list of the world's 500 largest companies combined to generate $41.7 trillion in revenue over the past year.

Almost $20 trillion in revenue—and a record-breaking $1.87 trillion in profits. Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive list of the biggest companies in America.

Energy sector dominated this year for the first time since 2008, with 28 companies featured on the list.

100 Fastest-Growing Companies

The corporations on our annual list posted aggregate revenues of $41 trillion for the second year in a row.

Industries included in the sector are mining, oil and gas exploration and services, pipelines, refining, and utilities.

Fortune Sector Leaders: Energy

The Fortune 500, in its 70th year in 2024, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

The corporations on our annual list of the world’s largest companies delivered a record $41 trillion in aggregate revenues.

G500-2023-Phillips 66

Phillips 66, a major operator of refineries and gas stations, climbed 37 spots in the rankings on the back of soaring crude oil prices, which boosted its revenue by 53% to $175 billion in 2022. 
<ul> 
 	<li>In an effort to expand its already lucrative natural gas business—which generated $3.2 billion in profit in 2022—Phillips 66 acquired all the publicly available shares of pipeline company DCP Midstream, amassing an 87% equity stake.</li> 
 	<li>In October 2022 Phillips 66 laid off 1,100 employees as part of CEO Mark Lashier’s attempts to find $500 million in cost savings by year-end.</li> 
 	<li>As part of the oil company’s sustainability efforts, Phillips 66 has announced that it will convert a crude oil refinery in Northern California to a renewable fuels facility that will manufacture biofuels.</li> 
</ul>

The Fortune 500, in its 69th year in 2023, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

F500 2023-Phillips 66

Phillips 66, a major operator of refineries and gas stations, climbed 12 spots in the rankings on the back of soaring crude oil prices, which boosted its revenue by 53% to $175 billion in 2022. 
<ul> 
 	<li>In an effort to expand its already lucrative natural gas business—which generated $3.2 billion in profit in 2022—Phillips 66 acquired all the publicly available shares of pipeline company DCP Midstream, amassing an 87% equity stake.</li> 
 	<li>In October 2022 Phillips 66 laid off 1,100 employees as part of CEO Mark Lashier’s attempts to find $500 million in cost savings by year-end.</li> 
 	<li>As part of the oil company’s sustainability efforts, Phillips 66 has announced that it will convert a crude oil refinery in Northern California to a renewable fuels facility that will manufacture biofuels.</li> 
</ul>

Aggregate sales hit $37.8 trillion last year—an increase of 19%, the highest annual growth rate in the list’s history.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 68th running of the list.

F500 2022 Phillips 66

As the world opened up in 2021, Phillips 66 bounced back; its revenue rose 75.4%, to $116 billion, boosted by the rebound in fuel consumption. As a major operator of refineries and gas stations, the company’s profit margins can be vulnerable when oil prices are particularly high, but Phillips was still able to produce $1.3 billion in profit. In April 2022, Mark Lashier, formerly president and CEO of the Chevron Phillips Chemical Company joint venture, succeeded Greg Garland as Phillips 66 CEO.

Total revenue for the world’s biggest companies fell 4.8% to $31.7 trillion this year—the first decline in half a decade.

G500 143 Phillips 66

It was a tumultuous year for Phillips 66, the Houston-based energy company. As lockdowns rippled around the globe, demand for transport fuels for cars and planes plunged, while losses mounted industrywide. Phillips 66 was no exception: The company lost $4 billion for the full year on a 40% drop in revenues. Like its peers, the company cut operating costs and slashed capital spending. The start of 2021, too, was rocky, as a crippling February storm in Texas hit operations in the state from refineries to pipelines.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 67th running of the list.

F500-2021-48-Phillips 66

This year's Fortune Global 500 generated $33.3 trillion in revenues and $2.1 trillion in profits.

G500-2020-061-Phillips 66

Phillips 66 continued to expand in 2019, extending its network of pipelines. It announced an $8 billion joint petrochemical venture with Chevron and Qatar Petroleum, and pushed for an offshore export terminal in the Gulf of Mexico. The Houston-based refiner was not hiding its ambition: it wanted to go all-in on the U.S. shale boom. But relatively weak prices in 2019 helped push the company’s adjusted earnings down by about 34% from last year's figure, to $3.7 billion. Across the oil sector, 2020 started with a jolt. The January price spike gave way to the coronavirus-fueled price crash, which quickly led refineries to cut back production.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 66th running of the list.

F500-2020-027-Philips-66

Phillips66 continued to expand in 2019, extending its network of pipelines. It announced an $8 billion joint petrochemical venture with Chevron and Qatar Petroleum, and pushed for an offshore export terminal in the Gulf of Mexico. The Houston-based refiner was not hiding its ambition: it wanted to go all-in on the U.S. shale boom. But relatively weak prices in 2019 helped push the company’s adjusted earnings down by about 34% from last year's figure, to $3.7 billion. Across the oil sector, 2020 started with a jolt. The January price spike gave way to the coronavirus-fueled price crash, which quickly led refineries to cut back production rates.

This year's Fortune Global 500 generated $27.7 trillion in revenues and $1.5 trillion in profits.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 65th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 64th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 63rd running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2016 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

World's Most Admired Companies

This year's Fortune Global 500 generated $27.6 trillion in revenues and $1.5 trillion in profits.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 62nd running of the list.

Business insiders have spoken: Asked which companies they most admire, more than 4,100 executives, directors, and analysts chose these top 50 All-Stars.

The world's 500 largest companies generated $31.2 trillion in revenues and $1.7 trillion in profits in 2014. Together, this year's Fortune Global 500 employ 65 million people worldwide and are represented by 36 countries.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 61st running of the list. Wal-Mart claims the top spot again. See who made the list.

Global business is back. After limping through a worldwide financial crisis and economic slowdown, the 500 largest companies ranked by revenues shattered all sorts of performance records in 2013: They racked up combined revenues of $31.1 trillion, up 2.5% from 2012, and profits soared 27% to nearly $2 trillion. China’s 95 companies (up from 89 last year) posted $5.8 trillion in revenues. The U.S. has four fewer companies on the list than last year but remains (for now) the country leader, with 128 corporations on the list—including No. 1 Wal-Mart Stores—reporting $8.6 trillion in revenues. 

Wal-Mart stayed on top as its sales crept closer to half-a-trillion dollars. Apple moved into the top five. And UnitedHealth Group continued its steady climb. 

Company Info

Industry

Industry Rank

Previous Industry Rank

Overall Score

Location

Website

Fortune 500 Rank

Fortune 500 Profile

Global 500 Rank

Global 500 Profile

Fastest-growing Companies

Revenue 3 Yr Growth Rank

Revenue 3 Yr Annual Growth Rate

EPS 3 Yr Growth Rank

EPS 3 Yr Annual Growth Rate

Total Return 3 Yr Rank

Total Return 3 Yr Annual Rate

Beat S&P 500 3 Yr Return

Current Streak

Years on List

Sector

Key Financials (last Fiscal Year)

Revenues ($M)

Profits ($M)

Assets ($M)

Total Stockholder Equity ($M)

Profit Ratios

Profit as % of Revenues

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholder Equity

Earnings Per Share (last Fiscal Year)

Earnings Per Share ($)

EPS % Change (from prior fiscal year)

EPS % Change (5 year annual rate)

EPS % Change (10 year annual rate)

Total Return

Total Return to Investors (last year)

Total Return to Investors (5 year, annualized)

Total Return to Investors (10 year, annualized)

Phillips 66 is a multinational energy company focused on refining, midstream, chemicals, and marketing. As of 2026, Phillips 66 operates ten crude oil refineries in the U.S. Its midstream business focuses on crude oil and refined products, as well as collecting and processing natural gas. The company produces chemicals for various uses in the automotive, pharmaceutical, home, and electronics industries. The marketing arm includes 7,200 fuel stations with Phillips 66, Conoco, and 76 branding.

Q2 2026

Q1 2026

Q4 2025

Q3 2025

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Q4 2024

Phillips 66 (PSX): Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings

legacy

Phillips 66

phillips 66

Welcome to the Second Quarter twenty twenty five Phillips sixty six Earnings Conference Call. My name is Emily, and I'll be your operator for today's call. At this time, all participants are in a listen only mode. Later, we will conduct a question and answer session.

Please note that this conference is being recorded. I'll now turn the call over to Jeff Dietert, Vice President, Investor Relations. Jeff, you may begin.

Welcome to Phillips sixty six earnings conference call. Participants on today's call will include Mark Lazier, Chairman and

CEO Kevin Mitchell, CFO Don Baldridge, Midstream and Chemicals Rich Harvison, Refining and Brian Mandel, Marketing and Commercial. Today's presentation can be found on the Investor Relations section of the Phillips sixty six website along with supplemental financial and operating information. Slide two contains our Safe Harbor statement. We will be making forward looking statements during today's call. Actual results may differ materially from today's comments.

Factors that could cause actual results to differ are included here as well as in our SEC filings. With that, I'll turn the call over to Mark.

Thanks, Jeff. Welcome everyone to our second quarter earnings call. We had a strong financial and operating results this quarter. They're a reflection of our focused strategy, disciplined execution and meaningful progress towards achieving our 2027 strategic priorities. Coming off our large spring turnaround program, we said we were positioned to capture strengthening market and we delivered.

Our refining assets ran at 98% utilization, the highest since 2018. Clean product yield was over 86%. We captured 99% of our market indicator and achieved our lowest adjusted cost per barrel since 2021. Along with refining, the other parts of our integrated business delivered. Midstream generated adjusted EBITDA of approximately $1,000,000,000 We're on track to achieve the $4,500,000,000 annual EBITDA target in Midstream by 2027.

Marketing and Specialties reported its strongest quarter since 2022. The combination of stable contributions from Midstream and Marketing and Specialties provide a robust platform for our capital allocation framework. We returned over $900,000,000 to shareholders this quarter. The resilience of our integrated business model drives results delivering consistent returns to shareholders. Slide four shows the progress we've made in our refining business from targeted low capital, high return investments and a dedication to operating excellence.

Results are clear. Utilization is improving and we're consistently above industry average. We've been setting new clean product yield records. Year to date, our yield is 2% higher than the previous record for the same period set in 2024. These factors have contributed market capture improving to 99% of our published refining indicator this quarter.

Year to date, market capture has increased 5% compared to the first half of last year. Our goal is to drive performance in any market environment while running our assets safely and reliably. The second quarter PSX market indicator was just over $11 a barrel. As a reminder, for every dollar per barrel that the indicator increases, EBITDA increases by roughly $170,000,000 per quarter. In the second quarter, we achieved the lowest refining adjusted cost per barrel since 2021.

The organization has done a fantastic job embracing a culture of continuous improvement, enabling us to more than offset inflation. By 2027, we expect to see the adjusted cost per barrel number below $5.5 per barrel on an annual basis. Midstream is a key growth driver for our company and creates ongoing value for our shareholders through reliable long term cash generation. Slide five shows the increase in quarterly average adjusted EBITDA from $500,000,000 in 2021 to $1,000,000,000 this quarter. We reached significant milestones in the second quarter as we continue to enhance our integrated wellhead to market strategy.

We acquired EPIC NGL, now renamed Coastal Bend at the beginning of the quarter. We're also near completion on the capacity expansion pipeline project from 175,000 to 225,000 barrels per day. The Dos Pikos II gas processing plant came online ahead of schedule and on budget at the end of the second quarter. This plant and the previously announced Iron Mesa plant are great examples of highly strategic and selective investments that enhance Midstream's return on capital employed. These projects contribute to our plan to organically grow Midstream EBITDA to $4,500,000,000 by 2027.

Midstream is an important part of the Phillips sixty six story. We're executing on our wellhead to market strategy and the results are coming through. Over the past several months, we've had the opportunity to extensively engage with shareholders leading up to and following the Annual Shareholder Meeting. These conversations provided valuable constructive feedback on our strategic direction along with the support of our priorities. We will remain focused on four key areas: enhancing our refining competitiveness driving organic growth in midstream reducing debt and returning over 50% of net operating cash flow to shareholders through share repurchases and a secure competitive and growing dividend.

We've made substantial progress and remain committed to maintaining safe and reliable operations as we execute on achieving these initiatives by 2027. In the second quarter, we welcome the addition of three new Board members. As we do with all new directors, each new Board member participated in a comprehensive multi day onboarding process with a broad group of our senior leadership team, equipping them to contribute meaningfully and immediately. The extensive industry experience of our Board members continues to promote thoughtful discussion and thorough evaluation of all opportunities for maximizing shareholder value. Now I'll turn the call over to Kevin to cover the results for the quarter.

Thank you, Mark. On Slide seven, second quarter reported earnings were $877,000,000 or $2.15 per share. Adjusted earnings were $973,000,000 or $2.38 per share. Both the reported and adjusted earnings include the $239,000,000 pretax impact of accelerated depreciation due to our plan to cease operations at the Los Angeles refinery in the fourth quarter.

We generated $845,000,000 of operating cash flow. Operating cash flow excluding working capital was $1,900,000,000 We returned $9.00 $6,000,000 to shareholders, including $419,000,000 of share repurchases. Net debt to capital was 41% and reflects the impact of the acquisition of the Coastal Bend assets. We plan to reduce debt with operating cash flow and proceeds from the announced Germany and Austria retail marketing disposition, which we expect to close in the fourth quarter. I will now cover the segment results on slide eight.

Total company adjusted earnings increased $1,300,000,000 to $973,000,000 compared with prior quarter's adjusted loss of $368,000,000 Midstream results increased mainly due to higher volumes, primarily due to the acquisition of the Coastal Bend assets. In Chemicals, results decreased mainly due to lower polyethylene margins driven by lower sales prices. Refining results increased mainly due to higher realized margins. We came out of the high turnaround season in the first quarter well positioned to capture improved crack spreads. Market capture was 99% and crude utilization was 98%.

In addition, costs were lower primarily due to the absence of first quarter turnaround impacts. Marketing and Specialties results improved due to seasonally higher margins and volumes. In Renewable Fuels, results improved primarily due to higher realized margins including inventory impacts. Slide nine shows cash flow for the second quarter. Cash from operations, excluding working capital, was $1,900,000,000 Working capital was a use of $1,100,000,000 primarily due to an increase in accounts receivable from higher refined product sales in the quarter following the spring turnaround program.

Debt increased primarily due to the acquisition of the Coastal Bend assets for $2,200,000,000 We funded $587,000,000 of capital spending and returned $9.00 $6,000,000 to shareholders through share repurchases and dividends. Our ending cash balance was $1,100,000,000 Looking ahead to the third quarter on Slide 10. In Chemicals, we expect the global O and P utilization rate to be in the mid-90s. In Refining, we expect the worldwide crude utilization rate to be in the low to mid-90s and turnaround expense to be between 50,000,000 and $60,000,000 We continue to optimize turnarounds and improve performance. We are reducing the full year turnaround guidance by $100,000,000 The new guidance is 400,000,000 to $450,000,000 compared to the previous guidance of $500,000,000 to $550,000,000 We anticipate corporate and other costs to be between $350,000,000 and $370,000,000 Now we will move to Slide 11 and open the line for questions, after which Mark will wrap up the call.

Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. As we open the call for questions, as a courtesy to all participants, please limit yourself to one question and a follow-up. If you have a question, please press then one on your touch tone phone. If you wish to be removed from the queue, please press then 2.

Our first question today comes from Doug Leggate with Wolfe Research. Please go ahead. Your line is now open.

Thanks. Good morning, everyone. Mark, after all the drama over the last six months, quite a quarter you put up. So good to see that. I am curious, however, your last part of your prepared remarks, you said you referenced, I don't want to put words in your mouth here, but it was kind of engaging with shareholders and, obviously reviewing or continuing to review the appropriate opportunities to maximize value.

I guess it's a strategy question. So after everything that's happened in the last six months, are you still comfortable with this the forward strategy of the integrated company? Or do you envisage any incremental changes in light of the what you've been through the last three or four months?

Yes, Doug. It's a good solid question. Thank you for asking that. And we've been quite encouraged, frankly, by the constructive engagement we've had with all of our shareholders, over the last several months. You know, the results of the vote, we believe, reflect, what's been a consistent theme in the conversations that we've had with shareholders.

They understand the value inherent in the business, and they recognize that our plans can provide upside as we continue to execute against them. We're fully aligned, and the shareholders agree that there's significant value in Phillips sixty six and we've got to go out and capture that upside. So as we always do, we continue to evaluate a wide range of strategic alternatives. Our board is very engaged in the process, constantly questioning us, is the strategy effective? Do we need to tweak it?

Do we need to make major changes to it? We have a wealth of experience and talent on our board. We've got we've got retired chairman, CEOs, CFOs, corporate executives that are well established and Wall Street veterans. And so they can they they constructively challenge our strategy every step of the way. And as I mentioned, we've got the three new members that have been deeply immersed in an onboarding process that gives them access to all the data that they didn't have access during the proxy season.

And so they they have a clear understanding of where we're headed, why we're headed that way, and how we can unlock value. And as I've said before, there's no sacred cows. We're not ideological about anything. We're well, we are ideological about one thing, and that's shareholder value creation. So let me correct myself.

But, you know, the right price and for the creation of long term value, we'll consider any alternatives. But we always, always, always are focused on the long term value creation opportunities. And so I think our shareholders agree with us in that regard.

I appreciate the very full answer, Mark. Thank you for that. My follow-up is, guess, I'm asking a lot of people about debt nowadays, but my follow-up is a little different perhaps in the context of the macro. So strong quarter, 2,500,000,000.0 of EBITDA. Obviously, you're not where you want to be on midstream.

But if I annualize that, the margin environment we had, we're still obviously quite a bit shy of the GBP 15,000,000,000. So my question is, if you had to try and normalize for today's environment, what would the $15,000,000,000 be? Meaning rather than making assumptions on the mid cycle, what would it be at today's environment? In other words, how far away from that are you? And if assuming it is less than 15,000,000,000, how does, how does Kevin think about the right level of debt for the, combined company as it stands today?

Yeah. I think what we've said and I I would say the controversy is around you know, putting a stake in the ground on what everybody believes that mid cycle conditions are in in refining. And so we said that based on our indicators, see that as a as a $14.14 dollar per barrel indicator. And so clearly, we're several dollars per barrel below away from that. And that's the key driver between that and what chemicals does.

And we're in the bottom of the cycle for chemicals, so we've got a lot of upside in chemicals to add to that number. So we've got a long way to go to get to those levels. Although, I would say this quarter, the gap to mid cycle closed considerably for refining, but chemicals is still a couple years out. So, Kevin, I'll turn it over to you for debt.

Yeah. And just one additional point, Doug. So refining EBITDA was $867,000,000 in the quarter. If you annualize that, you get a 3 and a half billion number. That's an $11 market indicator.

If you use the sensitivity to a $14 market indicator, it puts you just a little bit north of 5,000,000,000. You can question whether you have your own view on whether $14 per barrel market indicator is the right mid cycle, but that's what we've put out there. I will I would also caution though that this was a quarter with minimal turnaround activity. We ran extremely well. Typically, you're not gonna have four quarters of that in a given calendar year, so we need to adjust for that.

But fundamentally, we're in the ballpark of where we should be relative to our mid cycle assumptions. On the debt question, I go back to what we've been saying that the 17,000,000,000 of debt on a consolidated basis, we feel puts us in a very comfortable spot relative to our not only our mid cycle assumptions, but also in a in a less than mid cycle environment like we're at like we're in, today. Clearly, we're not at that debt level today, but we have that objective to get there over the next couple of years, we expect to do that. We expect to accomplish that through a combination of cash generated from operations as well as proceeds from dispositions. Notwithstanding all of that, it does not compromise our ability to continue to return cash to shareholders.

So 50% of operating cash flow, 50% or more of operating cash flow through share repurchases and dividends.

Appreciate the answers guys. Thanks very much indeed.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Manav Gupta with UBS. Please go ahead.

Good morning. I wanted to focus a little bit on the refining results. 99% capture, 98% crude utilization. I understand some of those things would be tough to replicate, but even quarter over quarter or year over year, these are remarkable achievements. So can you help us understand what helped you drive close to $1,300,000,000 in quarter over quarter improvement in refining?

I know the tracks were higher, but help us walk through some of the stuff which you were able to achieve here. I think you probably are working on it for some time, but it all came together in the second quarter.

Yes, Manav. Thank you. We appreciate that. As the data shows and as we've said for the last several years in refining, we had full intention to improve refining performance and we were with a focus on the things that we can control. That's most evident in things like the clean product yield, the utilization rate.

Market capture is going have more variability in it because of the movements in the market and crude dips and all those variables that we have less control over. But we absolutely will continue to drive costs down in the areas that we can control. Things like natural gas costs may go up and down, but where we're looking at the things that we can control, we'll continue to drive those costs now where it's responsible to do so. And so we'll continue to fight that fight and position refining for whatever the market conditions are. We're going to be out there to capture the market that's available.

And I think that's what we saw in the second quarter. It's a combination of very disciplined focus over the last three years of preparing and implementing projects and executing to be able to capture that market when it's available to us. So Rich can drive into more detail.

Yeah. Manav, let me go a little bit, maybe a layer deeper here on this. You know, our mission in refining is is to run the assets safely and reliably and then drive world class performance. And we do this, as Mark indicated, by managing the items we can't control and then sustainably implementing change over time. And, of course, the foundation for all of this is safe and reliable operations, and we are an industry leader in safety.

And we have that culture in our organization that continually challenges ourselves to be the best we can be. We've also established a comprehensive reliability program that has been applied to each of our assets out there in in the field, and we're measuring that success by mechanical availability. Ultimately, utilization of the assets will be the final measurement of that one. You you talked you asked a little bit about market capture. We had a fantastic quarter at 99% market capture.

But even if you look at the data a little bit closer, year over year, year to date, we're we're showing a 5% improvement year over year. So, you know, that's that's that sustainable improvement is is what we're looking for over time. And there's a couple reasons we're able to achieve that. One is the reliability program and the impact it's having on our ability to utilize our our assets, and crude utilization was at 98% for the quarter. That's actually nine out of the last 10.

We've we've been well above industry average on utilization, only interrupted by a set of turnarounds in the first quarter of of this year. We've reached some record clean product yield as well at 87% for for the assets. We're on pace this quarter also to meet that and potentially exceed it. And this is a reflection of what I've been talking about over the last three years, which is the execution of these small capital high return projects. They've improved both our clean product yield as well as driven flexibility into the into the system.

We've increased our ability to produce gasoline, diesel, and jet and swing between those those three components. We've also improved our flexibility to process light and heavy crudes without losing capacity in the in the overall system. There's no better example of this than at our Sweeney Complex where we recently completed the sour crude flex project, we called it. This project actually increased our ability to process light crude by three times the historic volume and the largest crude unit at the site to reduce our our dependence on waterborne crudes, and it also takes advantage of the integration of the site with the midstream NGLs and CPChem feedstock generation with increased light ends production, and we see a nice improvement with market capture with that project as well. Also, been driving inefficiencies out of the business.

I think this is also a big important part of refining performance, and we've been managing the fundamental difference here that we've been doing as an organization is managing the assets as a fleet versus a set of independent operations. And that's really opened up our ability to drive inefficiencies out of the out of the out of the business, and we've removed well over a dollar per barrel out of the system. We saw a really good number of $5.46 in the second quarter, and we're striving to be below $5.50 on an annualized basis as our goal. The key the key thing quarter over quarter was really higher utilization for the assets. We had a set of turnarounds in the first quarter.

We had 17% increase in volume in the second quarter. So that that improved really drove the dollar per barrel cost down. But if you look underneath that even a little bit more, the the operating cost for the assets were flat quarter over quarter with the exception of the turnarounds. So that base cost is still there. It's fixed.

It's doing we're able to operate the assets well, and it's a little bit subject, as Mark indicated, to the natural gas price as that is moving around a little bit on us right now, which drives a dollar per barrel as well. You know, we're making some portfolio management change changes with the Los Angeles refinery. But let me kinda wrap this up. You know, we we've made good progress, but we're not done. We'll continue to focus on and drive these strategies.

And I and and I think, Manav, if you look at it over time, you see this trend, the steady drumbeat of improvement that's occurred in in the refining system. And that means our processes of changing are really sustainably implemented. And most importantly, the people, our organization, our people have proven that we're willing to take on the hard work of change and put it in place and capture the opportunities over time. So Yep.

I just wanna echo Rich's closing comments there, whether it's refining, marketing, commercial, midstream, or back office. Across the board, we've got a company full of people that are humble enough to know we can always do it better, and we're driven to do it better. We've got the competitive mindset to do it better and to get up and do it better each and every day. And that's what's gonna make this sustainable and that's going to continue to improve those metrics that you've seen across the board. So thanks for the question.

Thank you, guys. A quick follow-up. Very strong results from M and S better than our expectations even if you deduct the $89,000,000 one time? Help us understand some of the dynamics there. And now that you have sold these assets, what would be a good run rate of EBITDA normalized for this business?

Yes, Manav. It's Kevin. So yes, very strong results in the quarter, $660,000,000 as highlighted. We had about $100,000,000 benefit in the quarter that were really timing with an offset in the first quarter. And so you'd call that a sort of one time effect, if you like.

And so as we as we as we look at the the results, we had higher volumes as we as the refining system came out of turnarounds and the seasonal effect on demand as well as stronger margins, which likewise, you have a seasonal driver there. But also just the nature of the way the product prices moved over the course the quarter. Falling prices tended to help that on the margin front. As as you look ahead, to the third quarter, we would expect to be at a more sort of normal level for the business in the third quarter, which is somewhere in the order of 450,000,000 to $500,000,000 of earnings is where we'd expect that to be. Your other component to the question on the disposition, so we haven't closed that disposition yet.

We expect that to happen in the fourth quarter. That will reduce EBITDA by about 50,000,000 per quarter when we, with that disposition of the 65% interest in our Germany and Austria business.

Thank you so much for responses, and it was great to see Mark on CNBC today morning. Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Neil Mehta with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Yes. Good morning. Good afternoon. I've been spending some time chatting with Mr. Dieter about global refining balances, and there's a healthy debate in the market over the next couple of years about how you guys are thinking about net capacity adds?

And then also the swing factor of China, which obviously has excess export capacity, but it's been pretty disciplined about product quotas. And so we just love your bottoms up view of how you think about those net adds over the next couple of years?

Hi, Neil. This is Brian. I would say that net refinery additions are low for as far out as we forecast certainly through the end of the decade. And that's before you even start thinking about unplanned shutdowns. We had Lindsay, UK refinery announced that they're shutting down or in the process of shutting down last week or this week, and we expect more of those coming in the system.

Also, some of the refineries, as you pointed out, particularly in Asia, they're petchem focused. So those when you're thinking about crude, you really have to think about clean product yields. And those are very low clean product yields, 30% to 35% clean product yields. So I'd say bottom line is with the net additions below demand expectations, we see a very strong margin environment.

Thanks, Brandon. Just follow-up on the cash flow, to Doug's question about just debt levels being about ten, eleven points higher than where you want it to be. Can you just talk about two dynamics? Working capital, there was a $1,100,000,000 outflow, but I would think that swings back in the back half. So if you could just talk about what drove that and how you think that evolves.

Then the jet sale, because between those two nuts, I think you can close a lot of the gap that you need to get to the $17,000,000,000 level.

Yes. Neil, it's Kevin. You're right on both fronts. So the working capital $1,100,000,000 use of cash as you highlighted that was predominantly due to increased accounts receivables. If you think about the end of the first quarter where utilization was much lower, we're still just wrapping up the heavy turnaround activity versus the June where we're running full product production and sales are significantly higher.

And so that creates a build in accounts receivable. That's the biggest single component to the move in working capital. There's also some inventory impact on the NGLs as we build for the sort of seasonal trade on that. And so over the course of the year, we would expect a benefit of working capital probably more fourth quarter item than a third quarter item because the receivables component that I mentioned, you'd expect that to continue at the same sort of levels through the third quarter. But come fourth quarter, you'll see the normal inventory reductions that will take place and probably some modest benefit on the receivables payables front.

So do expect that to come back. Expect the cash proceeds in the fourth quarter €1500000000.0.1600000000.0 dollars And so you put that together and we'll make some significant inroads towards the debt target.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Jason Gabelman with TD Cowen. Please go ahead, Jason.

Yes. Hey, thanks for taking my question. I wanted to go back to kind of how you're thinking about the business after the activism campaign that you endured and you know, there was a lot of focus on that midstream part of the business. And I'm wondering if if the company is is thinking about doing a a deep dive on that segment and and the structure that makes sense in any way that would be different than how you kind of evaluate that business in normal course through the year?

Absolutely. We've done that in the past. We'll continue to do that. We will look to see if anything has changed. We will engage with industry experts to make sure that we're thinking about it the right way.

And certainly, we'll we'll lay it out all all out for our board to drive to the right conclusion. So as I said earlier, nothing is off the table, but it's got to create long term value for our shareholders.

Great. And my follow-up is just on a couple of weaker segments, chems and renewable fuels. And on chems, just want to know if your outlook for when we reach mid cycle in that industry has changed at all? And then renewable fuels, given margins where they are, do you consider tapering back runs there and just kind of outlook for margins in general would be great. Thanks.

Yeah. I'll grab the chemicals question. Second quarter was particularly problematic when you think about the disruptions that tariffs caused. At one point, the Chinese had imposed punitive tariffs of of a 100% on polyethylene imports. And CPChem has really minimized its exposure to China, but all that material that was flowing into China got pushed back into the world market.

So that that was a big challenge this quarter. Our our longer term view is is still consistent. You're seeing rationalization in Europe. You're seeing rationalizations rumored in in Asia. And I think you're you're you're starting to see capitulation of those players that need to take assets off the table.

That'll be constructive, and we continue to see, things firming up throughout '26 into '20 into '27 and beyond without a lot of new capacity coming on other than what CPChem and Qatar Energy are are bringing to the table. And and again, CPChem fares relatively well versus their competitors because of the advantaged ethane position they they have both on The Gulf Coast and in The Middle East. And and the high density polyethylene volumes continue to be strong. That's they can run at at at high rates because demand for that product continues to grow. It's it's really a very resilient product, and and their cost position allows them to continue to operate profitably.

And so they built out a strong competitive position that's passing the test of time as others are showing weakness.

Hey, Jason. It's Brian. On the renewable front, renewable margins are indeed weak, and they were weaker in the second quarter slightly than the first quarter. We are running at reduced rates. In the second quarter, we went at reduced rates, and we continue to run at reduced rates.

Maybe I'll give you some color and tailwinds and headwinds in the regulatory and in the renewable segment in general. As you know, there's been a number of regulatory changes for 2026 and number of those are headwinds for the plants, including limiting the eligible feedstocks for PTC credits to those from North America and also in reducing the premium for sustainable aviation fuel. While we also have RVO obligations that support Lodeo renewed, other policies included in the RVO such as that reduced RIN generation for renewable fuels derived from imported feedstocks will present a challenge. We're doing a lot of things in self help, including talking to state and federal regulators to promote profitability for the plant. Additionally, we're working very hard on lowering the cost of operating the plant just like Rich has done in the refining segment.

We're focused on this plant as well. And we're thinking about how to adjust operations to increase SAF production and also to provide additional optionality for feedstocks. I'd say also there are some tailwinds we see in the market, potentially stronger LCFS and RIN credits with the tighter regulations. European markets are driving greater incentives, including Germany. We've been exporting to Europe almost every month this year.

There are stronger biofuels programs in Oregon and Washington and stronger Canadian markets as well. So I would say just in summary, Rodeo renewed, as you know, is one of the world's largest RD and SAF plants. And we can also generate up to 15% of the country's D4 and D5 RINs. So ensuring profitability for the plant will be important for energy supply, for affordable energy across

the country given the RIN generation and for energy dominance in The United States. Yeah. I would just add to that that, you know, it's clear that the losses are unacceptable and unsustainable. But this is, as Brian noted, a strategic asset not just for us, but for the country and for the whole RIN program. It's important as well as the volume of diesel that it produces and its capability to produce sustainable aviation fuel to meet a lot of the the policies that are underway.

So we are fully engaged at the federal level and fully engaged at the state level in California to make sure that all the right choices are made to support this strategic asset.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Jean Ann Salsbury with Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Hi. I have a midstream question. Obviously, the top concern right now across Permian volume levered midstream is the falling rig count in the Permian and whether growth could materially slow there next year. Can you talk about PSX's exposure to potentially slowing growth in the Permian and how you might actually be less exposed than some peers in the medium term given your high share of contracted third party volumes?

Hi, Jean Ann. Yeah. This is Don. I mean, a couple of things around the the Permian outlook. We we do stay very close with our producer customers.

And currently, we see, you know, not a significant change in their plans, based on based on where we are from a pricing standpoint and what their, what their drilling activity looks like. One of the things I think you have to realize though is is the NGL content in the new production is higher than than the old production. So even when you see some tampering in the or or the dampening of the volume growth in in crude, you're still seeing good robust growth on the gas and NGL side because of the higher GOR from the wells that are being drilled. So that certainly creates some buffer when you see some rig count changes or see a change in producer plans. But as you mentioned, our volume outlook is supported both by our G and P processing volumes as well as a robust third party contract portfolio.

And based on conversations we're having across the board, we still have good confidence in the outlook of the volumes coming through our system, see our rate our utilization rates continuing to stay high. We're turning on expansion at Coastal Bend and volumes continue to grow and fill that capacity. So feel like we're in good shape there.

Great, Don. Thanks for that color. And then as a as a broader follow-up, I think in the most recent PSX deck, there were a lot of examples of the $500,000,000 of operating synergies from integration. Can you just kind of speak high level, like, directionally, I guess, on what environments cause those operating synergies to be higher? Like, for example, is it just when there's better refining and chems margins, do those numbers go up too?

Or perhaps in more volatile environments, the operating synergies go up? But any kind or is it just more of a steady steady state number as you guys look at it?

Sure. I'll take this one. It is fairly steady. I mean, there's some seasonality when you think about butane blending with our refining kit and how that interacts with our NGL business. That has some seasonality.

But a lot of it is fairly steady when you think about a lot of this is throughput driven. A lot of this is operational synergies that we have across the portfolio. And so those tend to get realized on a month in and month out basis. So a lot of stability in that regard. I would echo what you heard certainly from Mark and Rich is that we still see a lot of opportunity to continually improve and even extract more value in the integrated model.

So excited for the opportunities that we see the the portfolio is presenting us.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Ryan Todd with Piper Sandler. Please go ahead.

Phillips 66 (PSX) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Company Participants