With a combined revenue of $21 trillion and $2.1 trillion in profits, the 2026 Fortune 500 is the definitive list of America's largest companies.

Fortune 500

AI is a major force shaping this year’s list—but it’s far from the only story.

World's Most Admired Companies

Almost $20 trillion in revenue—and a record-breaking $1.87 trillion in profits. Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive list of the biggest companies in America.

Leaders in all industries rely more than ever on Big Tech—and appreciate the giants that deliver, at scale, without drama.

Industries included in the sector are building materials, forest products, metals, and packaging.

Fortune Sector Leaders: Materials

The Fortune 500, in its 70th year in 2024, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

The 26th edition of the list shows how much esteem Big Tech giants command among other business leaders.

The 25th Fortune World’s Most Admired Companies list suggests that tech giants’ peers respect them as much as ever.

The Fortune 500, in its 69th year in 2023, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

Just as it dominates our economy, Big Tech now dominates Fortune’s annual ranking of corporate reputation.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 68th running of the list.

After a year in which humanity leaned more heavily than ever on tech giants, see which companies topped Fortune's ranking of corporate reputation.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 67th running of the list.

Packaging Corporation of America produces containerboard, uncoated freesheet (paper that doesn't contain pulp), and other packaging materials.

For an astounding 13th straight year, Apple claims the top spot in Fortune’s annual ranking of corporate reputation, based on a survey of almost 3,800 executives, directors, and analysts.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 66th running of the list.

F500-2020-437-Packaging-Corp-America

One of the country’s largest producers of packaging products, PCA also owns Boise Paper.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2019 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 65th running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2018 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 64th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 63rd running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 62nd running of the list.

Too fast to be stopped: 2016's top three-year performers in revenue, profits, and stock returns.

100 Fastest-Growing Companies

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 61st running of the list. Wal-Mart claims the top spot again. See who made the list.

This year's Fastest-Growing Companies marks the 19th running of the list. In our annual list of public companies with the most stellar three-year profit, revenue, and stock growth, Facebook makes its first appearance.

Wal-Mart stayed on top as its sales crept closer to half-a-trillion dollars. Apple moved into the top five. And UnitedHealth Group continued its steady climb. 

Fastest-growing Companies

Headquarters

Industry

Sector

Current Streak

Years on List

Website

Revenue, Net Income

Revenue past four quarters ($M)

Net Income past four quarters ($M)

Growth Rates And Ranks

Revenue 3 Yr Growth Rank

EPS 3 Yr Annual Growth Rate

EPS 3 Yr Growth Rank

Total Return 3 Yr Annual Rate

Total Return 3 Yr Rank

Current All-Star Rank

Previous All-Star Rank

Industry Rank

Previous Industry Rank

Overall Score

Innovation

People Management

Use of Corporate Assets

Social Responsibility

Quality of Management

Financial Soundness

Long-Term Investment Value

Quality of Products/Services

Global Competitiveness

Key Financials (last Fiscal Year)

Revenues ($M)

Profits ($M)

Assets ($M)

Total Stockholder Equity ($M)

Profit Ratios

Profit as % of Revenues

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholder Equity

Earnings Per Share (last Fiscal Year)

Earnings Per Share ($)

EPS % Change (from prior fiscal year)

EPS % Change (5 year annual rate)

EPS % Change (10 year annual rate)

Total Return

Total Return to Investors (last year)

Total Return to Investors (5 year, annualized)

Total Return to Investors (10 year, annualized)

The Packaging Corporation of America (PCA) is one of the largest manufacturers in North America of paper and paper products that are corrugated, or strengthened through ridges and folds. Through a series of mergers, PCA emerged in its modern incarnation in 1959 and went public in 2000. The company manages both paper mills and cardboard factories, among other facilities. PCA’s customers are distributors and retailers, including Office Depot and OfficeMax.

Q3 2026

Q2 2026

Q1 2026

Q4 2025

Q3 2025

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Q4 2024

Packaging Corp. of America (PKG): Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings

legacy

Packaging Corp. of America

packaging corp. of america

Thank you for joining Packaging Corporation of America's third quarter 2026 earnings conference call. Your host today will be Mark Kowlzan, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PCA. Upon conclusion of his narrative, there will be a question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn the conference call over to Mr. Kowlzan. Please go ahead when you're ready.

Thank you, Jamie. Appreciate it very much. Good morning, everyone, and thank you all for participating in Packaging Corporation of America's third quarter 2026 earnings release conference call. Again, I'm Mark Kowlzan, Chairman and CEO of PCA, and with me on the call today is Tom Hassfurther, our President, and Kent Pflederer, our Chief Financial Officer. I'll begin the call as usual with an overview of the third quarter results, then I'll be turning the call over to Tom and Kent, who will provide further details. After that, I'll be wrapping things up, then we'd be glad to take questions. Yesterday, we reported third quarter net income of $262 million, or $2.93 per share. Excluding special items, third quarter 2026 net income was $272 million, or $3.04 per share, compared to the third quarter 2025 net income of $247 million, or $2.73 per share.

Third quarter net sales were $2.6 billion in 2026 and $2.3 billion in 2025. Total company EBITDA for the third quarter, excluding special items, was $577 million in 2026 and $503 million in 2025. Third quarter net income included special items expense of $0.11 per share, primarily for costs and write-offs related to facilities closures, acquisition and integration-related costs, the impact of a fire at our Palmyra, Pennsylvania sheet feeder, and the Wallula restructuring charges. Details of the special items for the third quarter of 2026 and 2025 were included in the schedules that accompanied the earnings press release. Excluding the special items, our earnings increased by $0.31 per share compared to the third quarter of 2025. The contribution from the acquired Greif business was $0.24 favorable year-over-year, generating $0.13 of earnings this year versus an $0.11 loss last year in the first month of ownership.

Legacy earnings improved by $0.07 per share, driven by favorable price and mix in the packaging segment for $0.79, favorable production and sales volume in the packaging segment, which includes the impact of additional containerboard supplied to the Greif operations of $0.12, favorable price and mix in the paper segment for $0.05, and a lower share count, $0.02. These items were partially offset by higher labor and operating costs, $0.28, higher freight costs, $0.26, higher corporate and other expenses, $0.13, higher fiber costs, $0.12, higher depreciation and amortization expenses, $0.06, higher maintenance outage expenses in the paper segment for $0.04, lower sales volume in the paper segment for $0.01, and higher interest expense, excluding the Greif acquisition and debt issuance for $0.01.

As comparable quarters going forward will include the ownership of the acquired Greif business for the entire periods, we will no longer separate and state the earnings contribution from the acquisition in the future. We exceeded our guidance of $2.91 on the strength of price realization and a higher-than-expected contribution from the acquired Greif business. These items were partially offset by higher labor and operating costs, partially driven by lower-than-forecast corrugated products volume. Looking at our packaging business, EBITDA, excluding special items in the third quarter for 2026 of $578 million, with sales of $2.4 billion, resulted in a margin of 23.9%, versus last year's EBITDA of $492 million and sales of $2.1 billion or a 23.1% margin. The mills produced 1,489,000 tons during the quarter.

The legacy mills produced 1,286,000 tons of containerboard, about 77,000 tons more than the second quarter of 2026 and 31,000 tons more than the third quarter of 2025. The acquired mills produced 203,000 tons. Quite frankly, an exceptional number for a quarter in which Riverville was down for an extensive annual maintenance outage. System-wide, our inventories were up 34,000 tons from the end of the second quarter. In fact, most certainly, we need that inventory as we move into the fourth quarter. We've been able to catch up with keeping our plants adequately supplied, resume shipping via most efficient methods possible, and we're in a good position to supply our customers in the fourth quarter, even with three of our containerboard mills down for their annual maintenance outages.

Operational performance was excellent across the board, much improved from the second quarter, and we completed the first annual maintenance outage at the Riverville Mill under our own ownership safely and successfully. From the cost side, in addition to increasing freight, we saw significant increases in recycled fiber, purchased power, and chemical costs during the quarter, and we expect these input costs to continue to go up. Our mill production reflects improved output at Jackson, even ahead of the completion of the winder project coming online in the fourth quarter as we continue to maximize the performance of the paper machines. We also benefited from continued improvement and reliability out of the acquired Greif mills. I'll now be turning it over to Tom, who'll provide more details on containerboard sales and the corrugated business in general.

Thanks, Mark. Domestic containerboard and corrugated products prices and mix were $0.75 per share above the third quarter of 2025, and up $1.11 per share compared to the second quarter of 2026. We have realized substantially all of the first net $50 increase and about half of the second $50 increase. Price realization came in ahead of forecast for the third quarter. We expect to realize almost all of the remainder of the second increase in the fourth quarter. Realization of the $70 increase will be split between Q4 and Q1 and skewed more towards Q1 in terms of timing. Export containerboard prices were $0.04 above last year's third quarter and $0.03 above the second quarter of 2026. Export sales volume of containerboard was 5,000 tons higher than the second quarter of 2026 and 10,000 tons lower than the third quarter of 2025, and remains at a relatively low level.

While various factors that we've previously discussed led to lower agriculture end market volume, demand was solid throughout the quarter across the remainder of our customer base. Shipments were up around 11% in total and per day versus last year, with the legacy business down a half a percent, which is about in line with our expectations, taking into account the lower ag shipments. A silver lining is that we got ourselves back on solid footing from an inventory standpoint in time for what looks like a pretty strong fourth quarter from a volume standpoint based upon our September and October bookings. We were also able to save a lot on freight during the quarter by being able to plan and optimize our routes.

We remain in a very tight containerboard market, which based upon what we are seeing in our own system, appears to be further tightening with fourth quarter seasonal pickup. As Mark said earlier, we have three containerboard mills down for annual maintenance in the fourth quarter, including DeRidder, and we will need the mills continuing to perform at the top of their game to keep us properly supplied. The acquired corrugated business meaningfully contributed to our profitability during the quarter, though volumes took a hit from the fire at Palmyra that kept the plant down for most of September. Integration levels continue to improve, and legacy PCA mills supplied approximately 45,000 more tons of containerboard into the Greif system during the quarter than it did a year ago.

The improved integration, together with better operational performance in the mills that Mark mentioned earlier, has us well ahead of our synergy targets. All systems work will be completed during the fourth quarter, which will further improve our visibility and day-to-day management of the business. This acquisition is working out very well for us, in large part due to the quality and performance of our people, who have put in a tremendous effort integrating and running the business. I'll now turn it back to Mark.

Thanks, Tom. Looking at the paper segment, EBITDA, excluding special items in the third quarter, was $34 million, with sales of $163 million, or a 20.6% margin, compared to the third quarter of 2025 EBITDA of $40 million and sales of $161 million, or a 24.9% margin. The differences in EBITDA and margin results from the maintenance outage being in the second quarter last year and the third quarter this year. Sales volume was approximately 0.9% above the second quarter of 2026, and approximately 2.5% below the third quarter of 2025. Prices and mix were up 2.8% from the second quarter of 2026 and up 3.8% from the third quarter of 2025. Sales volume, price realization, and cost performance contributed to performance above our expectations. I'll now turn it over to Kent.

Thank you, Mark. Cash provided by operations was $472 million, and after $247 million of CapEx, free cash flow was $225 million. In addition to CapEx, the primary payments of cash during the quarter included dividend payments of $134 million, cash tax payments of $66 million, and net cash interest payments of $29 million. We did not repurchase shares during the quarter. Excluding special items, our effective tax rate during the third quarter was 25.8%. We expect our fourth quarter rate to be nearly identical to the third quarter. We now forecast $865 million-$890 million of CapEx for the year, and excluding special items, just above $705 million of depreciation and amortization. These primarily relate to timing of expenditures and assets placed in service and do not reflect changes in our overall plans.

Our special items expense for the year to date, just to remind you, through Q3, included just under $60 million of depreciation expense and write-offs, primarily associated with the Wallula restructuring. I'd now like to give you an update on the annual outage schedule and earnings impact for the rest of the year. Our outage expense was $0.28 during the third quarter. Our fourth quarter estimate is $0.72 now, totaling $1.48 for the year. The increase of $0.08 from when we last updated you is primarily due to some timing, with a couple of cents in 3Q moving into 4Q, as well as our decision to substantially increase the scope of maintenance activities at the completed third quarter Riverville outage with more costs now being amortized into the fourth quarter, and to a lesser degree, an increase in the scope of the DeRidder outage will take place next month.

Thanks, Kent. As we move from the third quarter into the fourth quarter, we expect solid corrugated products demand with some seasonal improvement. Shipments per day are expected to be at or around last year's fourth quarter level, with two fewer shipping days than the third quarter, and total corrugated shipments will be higher than the third quarter. Prices for containerboard and corrugated products are expected to improve as we continue to implement earlier price increases. But corrugated products mix will be seasonally weaker with higher e-commerce volumes. Containerboard production will be lower, with annual maintenance outages at three of our mills, and mill maintenance outage expenses, including the impact on production volume from the fourth quarter outages, will be significantly higher in the fourth quarter. We expect seasonally lower volume and slightly higher prices in the paper segment.

We expect freight costs to increase across our business, with diesel fuel prices above third-quarter levels. We also expect costs for recycled fiber to continue to increase, as well as higher wood fiber cost to increase due to winter yields and wood mix, and mill mix rather. Costs for chemicals and energy will increase due to higher chemical prices and higher seasonal energy usage. Considering these items, we expect fourth quarter earnings of $2.81 per share, excluding special items. With that, we would be happy to entertain any questions, but I must remind you that some of the statements we have made on the call today constituted forward-looking statements.

The statements were based on current estimates, expectations, and projections of the company, and do involve inherent risks and uncertainties, including the direction of the economy and those identified as risk factors in our annual report on Form 10-K on file with the SEC. Actual results could differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. With that, Jamie, I would like to open the call for questions.

We will begin that question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star and then one. To withdraw your questions, you may press star and two. If you are using a speakerphone, we do ask that you please pick up your handset prior to pressing the keys to ensure the best sound quality. Once again, that is star and then one to join the question queue. Our first question today comes from George Staphos from Bank of America. Please go ahead with your question.

Hi, everyone. Good morning. Thank you for the details. I wanted to maybe kick off on volume. You mentioned, Mark, that you expect volume to be, I am paraphrasing, even or around the volume trend from last year. Can you talk a little bit about what you are seeing in terms of bookings and billings, and how you characterize volume being at or around comparable with also a tight market as you are seeing it?

Good morning. Good. Bookings were good in September. They're doing very well here in October as well, up a little over 5%. Billings have lagged a little bit, and we expect that'll catch up during the fourth quarter. We're forecasting right now for pretty flat for the fourth quarter, but keep in mind that's a tough comp we're talking about as well. It's easy to kind of look at October, November, and get some insight, but December is always a bit of a crap shoot. We're just going to be a little cautious in terms of that forecast. But we're pleased with the cadence of the volume. We've had some struggles, as we mentioned, with the ag business, especially related to the lettuce issues and some things like that from some of our customers. And we expect some pickup. But again, that'll be determined seasonally.

Sometimes it picks up in the fourth quarter, sometimes it tracks into the first quarter. That's kind of where we are right now. Our mix is going to be a little more concentrated towards e-com in the fourth quarter as well.

Right. Appreciate that. Related to mix and volume, perhaps again in the third quarter, given the number that you gave in terms of pricing effect in 3Q was quite strong. You said pricing is ahead of your expectations. Do you think that perhaps maybe you've lost a little bit of volume momentum at all with your pricing or not really, and why you view that to be the case? Relatedly, when we do just revenue over tons, the mix was a little bit a couple points lower than we're expecting. Is that Greif effect or is that e-commerce effect in the third quarter from what you could see? Then I had one last follow-on.

George, I'm going to remind you of something we've talked about for years. When we're in price increase mode, we're 100% focused on price increase.

Because those opportunities don't come along that often, and that's incredibly important to our business in the long term. Relative to volume, we may lose an item or something like that, but for the most part, these are the same customers we've been dealing with for a long time, and they understand the situation we're in, and they're in the exact same situation. When you're using revenue over tons, yeah, there's some Greif effect in there, no question about it. That's a different That's a different segment of the market that we weren't in before. That's going to impact that a little bit. Hopefully that gives you your answer.

It does. Lastly, you mentioned that the CapEx increase and the maintenance spending tweaks were mostly timing. Was there anything in there that was actually required or maybe not anticipated that you had to pull forward in terms of maintenance or CapEx? Thanks and good luck in the quarter.

George, I'll give it to Mark after this, but in terms of timing, no. We were a little favorable in 3Q to what we'd put out there last time, but that rolls into the 4Q. That's really kind of timing of amortization of expenses more than anything else. In terms of activities, Mark can maybe comment a little bit more on what we're doing in the two mills.

Yeah. George, we always reserve the right for new discoveries, new opportunities. We move the capital up and down as we see fit, and some of it's just timing on engineering and deliveries of equipment for installation. But we're pretty encouraged. We just went through that annual shutdown at Riverville, and during that week of downtime, for most of that week, we had over 1,400, 1,500 contractors and people in the mill site working on that mill. We found some good opportunities, and it will lay out some really nice upside opportunity for that mill over the next few years. I'm talking about things like some headbox, some forming section work, some dryer section work, press section work, things in the back end of the mill.

We're very encouraged by the continuing opportunity that Massillon and Riverville will provide, and much in the same way that the Boise mills delivered over the years. Using that term, the gift that keeps on giving.

Understood. Thank you. I will turn it over.

Our next question comes from Mike Roxland from Truist. Please go ahead with your question.

Yeah. Thank you, Mark, Tom, and Kent, for taking my questions.

First question, it seems like the Greif assets provided most of the upside to 3Q, as price cost overall was neutral based on our estimate. First, would you agree with that assessment? If so, what drove the strong performance at Greif, and why was it better than expected?

Let me talk about Greif, then Tom and Kent can weigh in. We took some criticism last year during the first phase of our ownership of Greif, because we got heavily engaged in fixing the assets right away. We had all of our technology organization heavily involved in Massillon and Riverville right from the get-go last September, when we closed on September 2. So we took advantage of that, and very quickly were able to get the mills in a very good position to start delivering results. We talked about that on the second quarter earnings call, that we had accomplished a great deal from a reliability and a performance point of view. So, quite frankly, through the summer months into the fall now, we've seen exceptional performance coming out of both of those mills.

The same thing on the CorrChoice side of the business. They continue to make improvements. So, again, that's what we do. That's what PCA does best. We've got an incredible technology and operational group across the board. So the results speak to that. Tom, Kent, do you want to weigh in on that?

I'll just add, obviously the integration did help a lot. I would not put it all on Greif. Some of the other things that we do, and we do incredibly well, is we can utilize these Greif assets in some different ways than they were able to use it, since we have such a large system and we're positioned all across the United States. So there's some end market restructuring that took place as well within our system, which contributed. There's some puts and takes to that. You may move it over to one as opposed to the other. So, that's why I say you can't just hang it all on Greif. But it did provide a lot of opportunities for us. As Mark mentioned, that's what we do well.

We get in there, and we take advantage of it, and we figure out how to maximize these assets in a way that perhaps wasn't previously available to the previous owner. I think, when I talk about end market structure, that's not only how we're going to these end markets, but also perhaps some of the opportunities that afford themselves in terms of profitability as well. Kent, you got anything else?

No, it's very helpful. Just one quick one. Can you help me understand, Tom, what happened to legacy volumes in 3Q? If you look back a couple of quarters, you were outperforming the industry by a few hundred basis points. In 3Q, legacy box volumes declined 0.5%. Obviously, you had the ag issue, but I think the 0.5%, when all is said and done, when we get the industry numbers, you'll probably be in line with the industry. So wondering what's happened with it in terms of the outperformance. Is it just a matter of you maybe focusing more on price and less so on volumes?

Well, Mike, let's put it this way. Our objective is profitable revenue growth. That can come in a number of different ways. Price is our supreme focus at the moment. That is what is driving our results at the moment.

As I mentioned before, we did have a couple of segments that we are pretty large in that have been a little bit of a drag, but it has nothing to do with losing business. It is just that they had some issues of their own, which cut down some of their demand.

Got it. Makes sense. If I could squeeze one more in, just quickly. Kent, you guys guided 4Q to be down around $0.20 sequentially. How should we think about the progression from 4Q to 1Q this year, particularly given the fact that the third price increase is flowing through?

All right, Mike, without putting too fine of a point on this, because we really only guide one quarter in advance, but these are the drivers. You will see continued price improvement from 4Q to 1Q as the $70 increase, the remainder of that comes in. Okay? Mix also improves a little bit from 4Q to 1Q as well. Outage expense also, significantly the P&L hit moves in the right direction. Volume goes down, just seasonally. 4Q is sort of the peak. 1Q then it comes down a little bit. Mill production up a little bit because we have less outage impact. On the cost side, you are going to see mill operating costs primarily at 4Q, if not even a little unfavorable just because you are in winter. Then you have the normal inflation that hits the labor benefits, services, all that sort of thing. Starting at about 3%.

We do the best on that, though, to whittle that down through operational efficiency. I gave you a lot of factors there, but hopefully that gives you at least a start based upon our historical performance when you try to model all this.

Very helpful. Thanks, guys. And good luck in 4Q.

Next question comes from Mark Weintraub from Seaport Research Partners. Please go ahead with your question.

Great. Thank you. First, maybe just following up a little bit on these kind of sequential type analysis since we've been going there. As we think about 4Q versus 3Q, I think at a conference you had sort of talked about something less than $0.45 having been experienced last year, might be what you would see this year. Is the difference now the kind of more $0.20 reduction you're projecting from 3Q to 4Q? Is that a function of the September pricing? Would that be the main reason why that would have changed?

Oversimplified, yes, but I'll give you a little more color on this. We saw a fairly large sequential increase from 2Q to 3Q in price. Given the mix and given the timing of roll-in, we won't be nearly as favorable 3Q to 4Q, but the price favorability should be enough to offset the additional cost that we're taking on in the outages. That's about even. We then have higher operating costs, and if you look across the portfolio of costs in our mills and operations, you're going to have higher recycled, higher freight, higher seasonal. Offset a little bit by favorable in the corrugated operations, just due to better cost absorption. So you have all those factors into place. We're about $0.20-$0.25 down from 3Q to 4Q, but the big help there is realization of the $70 increase, the beginning of realizing that.

Yes, it does. Thank you. Obviously, you've been doing a terrific job offsetting a very difficult cost environment on the pricing side. I mean, your long-term track record has been a lot about company-specific value creation as well. You've alluded to several things that should help 2027 versus 2026 on that score already. Maybe if you could sort of give us a laundry list, Jackson, Counce, the box plant in Ohio, further gains from the Greif improvements, et cetera. I mean, what are the things that, big picture, we should be thinking about? Lastly, I think the energy projects are more 2028, but maybe update us on your thoughts there.

Let me start. The energy projects you'll see the benefit more into the 2028 period. Again, we're in construction mode right now at Jackson and breaking ground at DeRidder. We're waiting on permits for the gas turbine installation at the Riverville Mill. That's pending. You just hit it on the head. We continue with our capitalization program. Tom, comment on the successful startup of the new box plant in Ohio. We hit it out of the park on that one.

We had an incredibly good startup in our new Newark plant, which also allowed us to announce the closure of Middletown a little bit earlier than what we probably would have otherwise. We've got further installations going in there as we speak, and we're continuing the same cadence, basically, with putting in other equipment and upgrading other equipment in box plants all across the United States. So we have to be incredibly well-equipped to continue to deliver at the levels that we do for our customers, and provide them the quality that we have and those sorts of things. I might mention in addition the work we continue to do on our proprietary grades of paper is allowing us a lot of opportunity, and we'll continue to do that going forward. That has a lot to do with our CapEx as well. Mark, we're in

We continue to do what we do incredibly well, and we've been doing on a regular basis for the last decade.

Yeah. Another example, Mark, is the new winder at the Jackson Mill. That had been under construction for over a year, and we got that started up at the end of September, in really the last couple of weeks now, but it came up incredibly well, and that winder is running as planned. Jackson's got a duplicate winder now running 10,000 feet a minute if we need it, which the plan would be to put more fiber over that machine. I fully see the Jackson Mill, over the course of the next year and a half or so, will become a million-ton-a-year mill. We've been talking about that for the last six or seven years, that was the direction we were taking the mill, and that's where we're going. Counce is another example.

We've got the second phase of the work going on on the No. 2 machine at Counce to upgrade that capability. We'll be seeing further benefits, significant benefits, out of the Counce No. 2 machine, which will be productivity, quality, cost. Again, we've got approximately 200 people in the corporate technology organization dealing with these matters seven days a week. Those of us at the corporate level, this is what we do, and either we're doing and working on operational matters or the group's working on customer-based marketing and sales matters. That's what we focus on, and that's what we do well. Anything else?

Actually, one really quick one if I could, then. Maintenance outage expense, it's high this year. Is that just because things are more expensive, or were you just taking more outages this year than normal? If we think about next year, should we just assume similar to this year or not necessarily?

Good question. It's both. We undertook, obviously, with the Massillon Mill and the Riverville Mill, we undertook more activity. We're just doing some things at the legacy mills that we want to get done, and we always take care of these assets in terms of we may have older mills, but if I took you into these mills, you'd think they were new mills. Also it's the cost of capital. The equipment costs today are significantly higher than they were just a few years ago. Whether you're buying a pump or a motor or a new headbox, the costs have gone up dramatically just in the last year or so. Then again, the labor cost to install, if you're having contractors come in, that labor cost is up significantly.

That's really, it's the amount of work we're doing and taking advantage of the time and the capability to do it, and the pure capital cost of these components and the labor cost to do it. I would mention, we are in a really good position. For the last 10 years, we have gotten ahead of the curve, so to speak, on recapitalizing our box plant assets. Our mills are in great shape. Everything we're doing is more on autopilot opportunity, taking care of the customer base, growing with the customers. Tom, why don't you add a little bit more to that?

Well, just to follow up on that, Mark. I think we've mentioned this numerous times, but this cost of capital has gone up 2, 3x in a lot of cases, both at the mills and at the box plants. It's imperative in order to be able to continue to grow with our customers and be able to take care of our customers and all those other sorts of things, to be able to earn your cost of capital. That's part of a struggle that we have every day to make sure that we're able to do that. To Mark's point, also as I mentioned, we've been at this for a long time, so a lot of those improvements that we put in place were prior to some of these exorbitant increases that we're now encountering. Those are definitely considerations going forward.

All these projects that we've got going on also, God only knows we need all these tons too. They're sold already.

Our next question comes from Anojja Shah from UBS. Please go ahead with your question.

Morning. I wanted to ask about synergies. I think you said they are running ahead of plan. Any way to put a finer point on that, like how much it contributed in 3Q? Also, are you still expecting $30 million for this year, next year? Or do you think you can end up doing a little better than that?

No, we are doing a little better than that. We are on a run rate now between $40 million and $50 million. We called out 45,000 tons of increased integration from PCA into the acquired. That is a big piece of it. There are other integration benefits, and then there is just the reliability, cost performance, and whatnot at the acquired Greif mills. Run rate of 70,000 more tons now than what it was doing at the time of the acquisition. So really those buckets are the factors in the synergies at this point.

Right. Okay. Then switching over to end markets. Have you seen any pickup? So I know the FDA declared the Cyclospora outbreak done. Have you seen any improvement in your shipments, recognizing that it is probably a bit of a seasonal market? Also, can you talk about what you are seeing in your other end markets, industrial and consumer?

Anojja, I will take a stab at this. I have mentioned ag numerous times. We do see some recovery in ag. The question will be, is how much of that occurs in the fourth quarter and how much rolls over into the first quarter? Does weather cooperate? That has been also a little bit of a drag. Protein markets, especially on the beef side, have been down now for quite some time. Everybody has heard about the level of the herds and how long it is going to take to get those herds back up and get that volume back up. So that is going to still take some time. But the other market, e-com, is still not growing at the same rate it had grown for a long time, but still is a growing market and still doing quite well. Outside of that, the other markets are kind of where they are.

We'd like building products to pick up some and things like that. That has to do with government regulations and a whole bunch of other things, and interest rates. There's lots of puts and takes, and we're in so many different markets, and we've got thousands and thousands of customers in these various markets. So it's hard to predict any single one. Ag has stuck out more than others just because of what's gone on weather-wise and the lettuce and all the other things that have occurred.

Right. Okay, thank you very much for that. I'll turn it over.

Our next question comes from Phil Ng from Jefferies. Please go ahead with your question.

Hey, guys. Congrats on another strong quarter. I think if I heard you correctly, you guys are doing a little more extensive work in the fourth quarter with a DeRidder, and I think Massillon as well. My question is, does that unlock potentially more capacity, more debottlenecking? I think when you guys announced idling Wallula and debottlenecking some of the other mills, I had a number in mind, roughly 6 million tons of capacity once it's all said and done, but you guys always find new things to do. Can you kind of help us think through your capacity to produce, just because, as you kind of pointed out, market's very tight.

Yeah, if you think about our expected run rate for 2026 is probably going to be 5,757,000 tons. I would think we're on track, and I've been talking about this for the last year, that we'll get to be a 6 million ton system with this work that we're doing. It's basically, we get through these outages next year at Counce and some of the work we've got going on at Jackson. We certainly have that capability that depending on the grade mix you're producing, we're bumping up against that 6 million ton capability. But this is ongoing. This is what we do. We continue to stretch the capability. We see the opportunities. That's why I mentioned earlier on the call, the annual shutdown that just occurred at Riverville Mill.

It unlocked these opportunities before our eyes in terms of some capital input will greatly improve the productivity and performance of the Riverville Mill. That's going to be another piece of the containerboard supply over the next couple of years as we get that equipment installed and that mill stretched out. Massillon Mill is a good example. Massillon Mill is performing incredibly efficiently compared to a year ago. These are the little things that we do that make Massillon such an important mill to us. You've got the new box plant down in Newark. I believe it's like 80 mi from the Massillon Mill.

It is basically shuttle truck distance away. The Ashland box plant is probably 40 mi away from Massillon. Massillon being a very efficient mill just within the first year of ownership presents an incredible opportunity. But we will continue to stretch out. Long answer to your question, we are definitely at that 6 million ton, bumping that capacity and with the projects we have got coming on over the next six months to a year.

Got you. Any early read on CapEx next year and big projects in the horizon? You spent more than I think most people would be happy with, but anything that you have up your sleeve that we can talk about?

Well, we will give you a better target in the January call, as we always do. But I mentioned some of the bigger projects. Really, the big spend over the next 24 months will come from the gas turbine installations. We have got three gas turbines going in, and we have got to finish up the Counce No. 2 machine improvement work. That was a fairly sizable amount of work. Then the rest of it is just the whole host of opportunities that present themselves across the board in the box plants. It is going to be the one-off equipment. It is the EVOL, the BOBST, the various rotary die cutters, new corrugators to continue to grow with our customer base.

That is the beauty of that we invest with the customer. I think without giving you a number, if you think about the cadence of our capital for the last couple of years, we are going to take advantage of those type of opportunities. We are generating significant cash flows. I think the question will come as it has always been, what are we doing with all the excess cash? I will leave it at that.

Okay, super. Perhaps a question for Kent. Kent, you were kind enough to give some color sequentially from Q4 to Q1. Outside of the labor and benefits piece, which steps up every year around 1Q, are you starting to see your major input costs level off here, just your operations, freight, and stuff like that? Then any color on the September increase, how much of that is flowing through in Q4 versus 1Q? Is it like a 20/80 split?

Okay, so I will take your last one. I think it is probably a little more into Q4 than what you said. I do not want to throw a number, but it is better than 20/80 in terms of Q4 versus Q1. All right, so on input costs, freight recycled. Right now at least, looking past 4Q, we got to assume it stays at elevated levels, okay?

Until we see some sort of breakthrough in the drivers on those. Right now I am assuming at fairly high levels, similar to what we are forecasting for Q4.

Okay. That's helpful. Margins should improve nicely with costs leveling off. Thank you so much.

Our next question comes from Anthony Pettinari from Citi. Please go ahead with your question.

Packaging Corp. of America (PKG) Q3 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Company Participants