The companies on the Global 500 employ 70.2 million people, and their revenue represents more than one-third of the world’s GDP.

Fortune Global 500

With a combined revenue of $21 trillion and $2.1 trillion in profits, the 2026 Fortune 500 is the definitive list of America's largest companies.

Fortune 500

The 300 companies on this year’s list brought in over $12.5 trillion in revenue for the latest 12 months, with the median revenue figure at $24 billion.

America's Most Innovative Companies

AI is a major force shaping this year’s list—but it’s far from the only story.

World's Most Admired Companies

This ranking evaluates how Fortune 500 companies are deploying AI, and how technology leaders value those investments relative to industry peers.

Fortune AIQ 50

The corporations on our annual list of the world's 500 largest companies combined to generate $41.7 trillion in revenue over the past year.

Almost $20 trillion in revenue—and a record-breaking $1.87 trillion in profits. Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive list of the biggest companies in America.

The 300 companies on this year’s list brought in over $12.6 trillion in revenue for the latest 12 months, with the median revenue figure at $22 billion.

Leaders in all industries rely more than ever on Big Tech—and appreciate the giants that deliver, at scale, without drama.

The corporations on our annual list posted aggregate revenues of $41 trillion for the second year in a row.

Industry included in sector is aerospace and defense.

Fortune Sector Leaders: Aerospace and Defense

The Fortune 500, in its 70th year in 2024, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

The 200 companies on this list are transforming industries from the inside out.

The 26th edition of the list shows how much esteem Big Tech giants command among other business leaders.

The 25th Fortune World’s Most Admired Companies list suggests that tech giants’ peers respect them as much as ever.

The corporations on our annual list of the world’s largest companies delivered a record $41 trillion in aggregate revenues.

The 300 companies on this list are transforming industries from the inside out.

The Fortune 500, in its 69th year in 2023, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

Just as it dominates our economy, Big Tech now dominates Fortune’s annual ranking of corporate reputation.

Aggregate sales hit $37.8 trillion last year—an increase of 19%, the highest annual growth rate in the list’s history.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 68th running of the list.

After a year in which humanity leaned more heavily than ever on tech giants, see which companies topped Fortune's ranking of corporate reputation.

Total revenue for the world’s biggest companies fell 4.8% to $31.7 trillion this year—the first decline in half a decade.

<span data-sheets-value="{&quot;1&quot;:2,&quot;2&quot;:&quot;Operating profits for this Fortune 500 mainstay nudged higher as the aerospace and defense giant pulled in $53 billion in new business contracts last year. The crowning achievement came from its Space Systems unit, which landed a $13.3 billion missile-systems deal from the U.S. Air Force. Overall, sales jumped 9% year on year, enabling Northrop Grumman to leap 10 spots in the rankings. In January 2021, the company’s board authorized a new plan to buy back $3 billion in shares. The stock has been on a tear since then, far outperforming the S&amp;P 500.&quot;}" data-sheets-userformat="{&quot;2&quot;:12673,&quot;3&quot;:{&quot;1&quot;:0},&quot;10&quot;:2,&quot;11&quot;:4,&quot;15&quot;:&quot;Calibri, Arial&quot;,&quot;16&quot;:12}" data-sheets-textstyleruns="{&quot;1&quot;:0}{&quot;1&quot;:27,&quot;2&quot;:{&quot;6&quot;:1}}{&quot;1&quot;:34}">Operating profits for Northrop Grumman nudged higher as the aerospace and defense giant pulled in $53 billion in new business contracts last year. The crowning achievement came from its Space Systems unit, which landed a $13.3 billion missile-systems deal from the U.S. Air Force. Overall, sales jumped 9% year on year, enabling Northrop Grumman to leap 42 spots in the Global 500 rankings. In January 2021, the company’s board authorized a new plan to buy back $3 billion in shares. The stock has been on a tear since then, far outperforming the S&amp;P 500.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 67th running of the list.

F500-2021-86-Northrop Grumman

<span data-sheets-value="{&quot;1&quot;:2,&quot;2&quot;:&quot;Operating profits for this Fortune 500 mainstay nudged higher as the aerospace and defense giant pulled in $53 billion in new business contracts last year. The crowning achievement came from its Space Systems unit, which landed a $13.3 billion missile-systems deal from the U.S. Air Force. Overall, sales jumped 9% year on year, enabling Northrop Grumman to leap 10 spots in the rankings. In January 2021, the company’s board authorized a new plan to buy back $3 billion in shares. The stock has been on a tear since then, far outperforming the S&amp;P 500.&quot;}" data-sheets-userformat="{&quot;2&quot;:12673,&quot;3&quot;:{&quot;1&quot;:0},&quot;10&quot;:2,&quot;11&quot;:4,&quot;15&quot;:&quot;Calibri, Arial&quot;,&quot;16&quot;:12}" data-sheets-textstyleruns="{&quot;1&quot;:0}{&quot;1&quot;:27,&quot;2&quot;:{&quot;6&quot;:1}}{&quot;1&quot;:34}">Operating profits for this Fortune 500 mainstay nudged higher as the aerospace and defense giant pulled in $53 billion in new business contracts last year. The crowning achievement came from its Space Systems unit, which landed a $13.3 billion missile-systems deal from the U.S. Air Force. Overall, sales jumped 9% year on year, enabling Northrop Grumman to leap 10 spots in the rankings. In January 2021, the company’s board authorized a new plan to buy back $3 billion in shares. The stock has been on a tear since then, far outperforming the S&amp;P 500.

For an astounding 13th straight year, Apple claims the top spot in Fortune’s annual ranking of corporate reputation, based on a survey of almost 3,800 executives, directors, and analysts.

This year's Fortune Global 500 generated $33.3 trillion in revenues and $2.1 trillion in profits.

G500-2020-368-Northrop-Grumman

Northrop Grumman jumps up 48 spots on the Global 500 from last year, as it continues a decade-long turnaround. Revenue grew a solid 12.4%, though profits slumped more than 30%, in part due to operational challenges. One piece of pending news could help determine how long the company's growth streak continues: After a protracted competition with Boeing that included a regulatory inquiry by the Federal Trade Commission, Northrop has emerged as the de facto winner of the contract to upgrade the U.S. Air Force's fleet of intercontinental ballistic missiles. That contract, which is due to be formally awarded later in 2020, is worth $85 billion.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 66th running of the list.

F500-2020-096-Northrop-Grumman

Northrop vaults into the Fortune 100 this year, up 12 spots from last year, as it continues—or perhaps caps—a decade-long turnaround. Revenue grew a solid 12.4%, though profits slumped more than 30%, in part due to operational challenges. Northrop faced a threat in 2019 when rival Boeing dropped out of the competition for an $85 billion missile contract, and demanded that regulators intervene over Northrop’s 2018 purchase of rocket engine maker Orbital ATK. The Federal Trade Commission started an inquiry, but no further action followed. That set up a game-changing 2020 surprise: With Boeing out of the picture for the missile contract and Northrop the de facto winner, the Air Force said that it may award Northrop the deal ahead of schedule.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2019 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune Global 500 generated $27.7 trillion in revenues and $1.5 trillion in profits.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 65th running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2018 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 64th running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2017 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 63rd running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2016 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune Global 500 generated $27.6 trillion in revenues and $1.5 trillion in profits.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 62nd running of the list.

Business insiders have spoken: Asked which companies they most admire, more than 4,100 executives, directors, and analysts chose these top 50 All-Stars.

The world's 500 largest companies generated $31.2 trillion in revenues and $1.7 trillion in profits in 2014. Together, this year's Fortune Global 500 employ 65 million people worldwide and are represented by 36 countries.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 61st running of the list. Wal-Mart claims the top spot again. See who made the list.

Global business is back. After limping through a worldwide financial crisis and economic slowdown, the 500 largest companies ranked by revenues shattered all sorts of performance records in 2013: They racked up combined revenues of $31.1 trillion, up 2.5% from 2012, and profits soared 27% to nearly $2 trillion. China’s 95 companies (up from 89 last year) posted $5.8 trillion in revenues. The U.S. has four fewer companies on the list than last year but remains (for now) the country leader, with 128 corporations on the list—including No. 1 Wal-Mart Stores—reporting $8.6 trillion in revenues. 

Wal-Mart stayed on top as its sales crept closer to half-a-trillion dollars. Apple moved into the top five. And UnitedHealth Group continued its steady climb. 

Sector

Industry

Current All-Star Rank

Previous All-Star Rank

Industry Rank

Previous Industry Rank

Overall Score

Innovation

People Management

Use of Corporate Assets

Social Responsibility

Quality of Management

Financial Soundness

Long-Term Investment Value

Quality of Products/Services

Global Competitiveness

Strongest Dimension

Years on list

Previous rank

State

Key Financials (last Fiscal Year)

Revenues ($M)

Profits ($M)

Assets ($M)

Total Stockholder Equity ($M)

Profit Ratios

Profit as % of Revenues

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholder Equity

Earnings Per Share (last Fiscal Year)

Earnings Per Share ($)

EPS % Change (from prior fiscal year)

EPS % Change (5 year annual rate)

EPS % Change (10 year annual rate)

Total Return

Total Return to Investors (last year)

Total Return to Investors (5 year, annualized)

Total Return to Investors (10 year, annualized)

Northrop Grumman, founded in 1939, is a global aerospace and defense technology company in the United States, Asia/Pacific, Europe, and internationally. The company is structured into four primary segments. The aeronautics systems segment is responsible for the design, development, manufacture, integration, and sustainment of aircraft systems. This division specializes in both manned and unmanned aircraft, including high-altitude long-endurance strategic ISR systems, vertical takeoff and landing tactical ISR systems, strategic long-range strike aircraft, tactical fighters, and airborne battle management and command and control systems. In the defense systems segment, Northrop Grumman focuses on tactical weapons and missile defense solutions. This division also provides sustainment, modernization, and training services for manned and unmanned aircraft and electronics systems. Their product range includes integrated command and control battle management systems, precision strike weapons, high-speed air-breathing and hypersonic systems, high-performance gun systems, ammunition, and advanced fuzes. Additionally, they offer logistics support, sustainment, operations, modernization, and warfighter training services. The mission systems segment specializes in command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (C4ISR) systems. This division develops and produces technologies including radar systems, electro-optical/infrared and acoustic sensors, electronic warfare systems, advanced communications and network systems, cyber solutions, intelligence processing systems, navigation systems, and maritime power, propulsion, and payload launch systems. The Space Systems segment focuses on space-related technologies and systems. This includes the development and production of satellites, spacecraft systems, subsystems, sensors, and payloads. The division also works on ground systems, missile defense systems and interceptors, launch vehicles and related propulsion systems, and strategic missiles.

Q2 2026

Q1 2026

Q4 2025

Q3 2025

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Q4 2024

Northrop Grumman (NOC): Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings

legacy

Northrop Grumman

northrop grumman

Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to Northrop Grumman's Second Quarter twenty twenty five Conference Call. Today's call is being recorded. My name is Josh, and I will be your operator today. At this time, all participants are in a listen only mode. I would like to turn the call over to your host, Mr. Todd Ernst, Vice President, Investor Relations. Mr. Ernst, please proceed.

Thanks, Josh, and good morning, everyone, and welcome to Northrop Grumman's second quarter twenty twenty five conference call. Before we start, matters discussed on today's call, including guidance and outlooks for 2025 and beyond, reflect the company's judgment based on information available at the time of this call. They constitute forward looking statements pursuant to safe harbor provisions of federal securities laws. Forward looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including those noted in today's press release and our SEC filings. These risks and uncertainties may cause actual company results to differ materially.

Today's call will include non GAAP financial measures that are reconciled to our GAAP results in our earnings release. In addition, we will refer to a presentation that is posted to our Investor Relations website. On the call today are Kathy Warden, our Chair, CEO and President and Ken Kruse, our CFO. At this time, I'd like to turn the call over to Kathy. Kathy?

Thanks, Todd. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. As you saw from this morning's earnings release, we delivered a strong second quarter. The breadth and depth of our company's portfolio and our ability to respond with speed to our customers' needs continues to drive robust growth, as evidenced by our strong backlog. In addition, our revenue increased 9% compared to the first quarter, with higher sequential sales in all four segments.

The team also delivered outstanding operating performance this quarter, as demonstrated by an 11.8% segment operating margin. As we look toward the second half of the year, we expect continued ramp on franchise programs and normal operational seasonality to support accelerating growth. We also expect segment margins to remain strong, consistent with our first half performance, excluding the B21 charge, and this is driven by performance, favorable mix, and international growth. Based on the strength of our second quarter results and confidence in our second half outlook, we are increasing our guidance for segment operating income, earnings per share, and free cash flow. The US and our allies are making significant investments in defense capabilities, and we continue to see growing demand and opportunity for our broad range of product offerings.

Whether in the space, air, land, cyber, or undersea domain, our technologies and our ability to integrate hardware and software for mission solutions are core to what customers need today. Domestically, these investments in defense are highlighted by the recently enacted reconciliation bill and FY 'twenty six budget request, which represents a combined 22% increase in procurement and RDT and E over fiscal year 2025. This includes investments in Northrop Grumman programs and new potential growth areas. And the demand acceleration for our products extends outside The United States. In the second quarter, our international sales grew by 18% year over year and are up 14% year to date.

We have a strong international book to bill for aircraft, weapons, missile defense, and airborne systems. In Europe, we see significant opportunities for IBCS and weapon systems. And in The Middle East, where I joined the President in May, there are several multibillion dollar opportunities in integrated air and missile defense, munitions, E-2D, ARGEM ER, and ground based radars. As part of our international strategy, we have extensive partnerships to support local industrial based growth. With a commitment to continue innovating and investing in capacity and a strong global demand signal from our customers, we are confident in our long range potential growth.

One area of expected growth that I'll highlight today is air and missile defense. With products such as IDCS and GPI, we're positioned as a key capability provider for missile defense to customers around the globe. And as we look to Golden Dome for America, we see Northrop Grumman playing a crucial role in supporting the administration's goal to move with speed and have initial operating capability in place within the next few years. This includes current products that can be brought to bear, like IBCS, GATOR, TRITON, and programs in a restricted portfolio, just to name a few. It will also include new innovations, like space based interceptors, which we're testing now.

We have the ability to work across the entire architecture, and we bring the scale, innovation, and research and development expertise that we can apply to each layer of this critical homeland defense initiative. Golden Dome is just one example of how the administration is pushing for differentiating capabilities at speed and scale to achieve Peace Through Strength. Importantly, they've recognized the need to remove barriers for industry and government that prevent us from moving faster. We are already seeing the benefits of this, to include our work on Sentinel and B-twenty one. On Sentinel, we made significant progress on the program restructuring in the second quarter.

In close partnership with the Air Force, we reached agreement on a restructure approach, which will lead to reestablishment of the program baseline. The work suspension on most aspects of the command and launch portion of the program was lifted, and we've resumed work on launch facility requirements and design. We continue to ramp on the program and make progress through development, testing, and risk reduction activities. Our second quarter results include strong Sentinel growth, as well as a positive earnings adjustment, reflecting the agreements we reached with our customer, and improved confidence in achieving various performance incentives. We expect Sentinel revenue momentum to continue and for the program to be a meaningful contributor to our growth in the second half of the year.

In partnership with the Department of Defense, we continue to work on acceleration options for the program, and we're confident in our ability to execute all phases of the program and deliver this critical capability for our nation. On the B-twenty one program, it continues to be well supported by the Defense Department and Congress, and the value and importance of a self strategic bomber was certainly shown with Operation Midnight Hammer. The Air Force has recently confirmed it is committed to the successful fielding of the B-twenty one and is investing in the infrastructure necessary to support an increased yearly production capacity. Through reconciliation, the B-twenty one received an additional $4,500,000,000 to increase production capacity. This builds on the efforts that we and the Air Force have made previously to prepare for a more rapid production ramp.

We are in discussions with the Air Force regarding the potential for an accelerated production ramp on the program, and while the ultimate outcome of these discussions remain uncertain, we currently expect any agreement to accelerate production ramp would require further investment by the company to expand production capacity, along with the opportunity to earn improved returns on the LRIP and NTE production lots. With the pace of change and advancements in technology coupled with our customers' push for speed, we are constantly working to introduce new technologies and concepts to address our customers' needs. Beacon, which is highlighted on the cover of our slide deck, is one example of how we approach this. With Beacon, which we revealed in the second quarter, we've taken decades of autonomy experience and 500,000 autonomous flight hours to create a flying mission testbed. We bring software from companies of all sizes together with our flight software and hardware.

Beacon will accelerate autonomous mission capabilities for our customers by allowing a variety of industry partners to move faster because of the work Northrop has done and is doing on autonomy. Our investment in Beacon also supports the administration's call for more next generation autonomous systems. Before wrapping my remarks, I want to highlight the importance of our strategy to invest in the business. Speed of bringing technology to market is important in this environment, and capacity is an important enabler to rapidly fielding capability. The capital investments we've made and that we continue to make allow us to meet this demand from our customers, remain competitive, and lay the groundwork for our future growth.

In the area of solid rocket motors, we have invested a billion dollars over the past six years, significantly improving our capacity and flexibility across multiple facilities. This includes investments at the Allegheny Ballistic Laboratory facility in West Virginia for small motors and in Elkton, Maryland for medium sized and hypersonic motors, both of which support growth in our tactical weapons business at DS. As a result of this investment, we were recently selected by the U. S. Navy to provide the 21 inches second stage solid rocket motor for its extended range missile programs.

We developed and demonstrated this capability in less than a year. In the space segment, our investments at the Bacchus facility for large rocket motors support the build out of the Kuiper satellite constellation. Overall, we expect to increase our total annual solid rocket motor production rate from 13,000 units today to 25,000 by 2029. We will continue to make strategic investments in our business to ensure we have the scale and capabilities needed to support our customers effectively. This includes emerging missile defense opportunities such as Golden Dome for America and second source qualification for several tactical missiles.

At the same time, we remain committed to returning capital to shareholders. This includes returning approximately 100% of our free cash flow to our shareholders through dividends and share repurchases this year. We repurchased nearly $900,000,000 in stock in the first half of the year, and in the second quarter, we announced a 12% increase in our quarterly dividend, marking our twenty second consecutive annual increase. This increase is supported by the strong growth in free cash flow at the company. Reflecting our focus on delivering long term value to shareholders, over the past ten years, we've increased our dividend at approximately 11% compounded annual growth rate.

In summary, I'd like to thank our team for an excellent quarter. We have an outstanding portfolio, robust global demand and funding environment that supports it, and a high performing team. This all leads to a strong outlook for our company. I'll now turn to Ken to share more details on our second quarter financial results and our outlook. Ken?

Thank you, Kathy, and good morning, everyone. I'll begin my comment with top line results for the quarter. As shown on slide four in the earnings deck, second quarter sales were 10,400,000,000.0 up 1% year over year. Sequentially, Q2 sales were up 9% compared to Q1, with all segments contributing to this meaningful growth. And organic sales were 10,300,000,000 up 2% year over year, reflecting the divestiture of the training services business, which closed ahead of schedule at the May.

Aeronautics second quarter sales increased by 2% year over year due to higher volume on B-twenty one and TACMO, partially offset by lower restricted sales. At DS, sales grew by 7% on a GAAP basis, driven by the Sentinel program and from higher ammunition sales. The training services business generated $40,000,000 of sales in Q2 before the transaction closed. So on an organic basis, DS sales increased 9% compared to the prior year. Mission Systems was our fastest growing segment in Q2, with sales up by 14% year over year.

This was driven in part by liquidation of inventory on a restricted award received in the period, which we had originally expected in Q1 and higher volume on marine programs. And at Space, Q2 sales were lower primarily due to the previously communicated wind down of work on two programs, reflecting $283,000,000 of year over year headwinds. Turning to slide five. Operational performance for the quarter was strong. Segment operating income was higher by 11% compared to Q2 of last year and our segment operating margin rate increased 100 basis points year over year to 11.8%.

AS operating income was up 3% compared to the prior year, with a Q2 operating margin rate of 10.3%. This portfolio continues to have a mix of mature production programs and newer development programs. And when coupled with strong program execution and disciplined cost management, it provides a formula for AS to deliver healthy margin rates. Defense Systems had a standout quarter of margin performance with the quarter two margin rate improving to 12.7%. This performance was driven by the recognition of a favorable EAC adjustment on the EMP phase of the Sentinel program, primarily based on expectations for achieving certain contract incentives.

At Mission Systems, second quarter margins expanded to 14% and operating income increased 22% year over year. This quarter's margin reflect improved production efficiencies and performance across airborne radar programs. And at Space Systems, operating income dollars were reflective of the lower sales volume, partially offset by improved program performance. Operating margin rate was 10.6%, up 50 basis points from Q2 of last year, driven by higher net EAC adjustments. Moving to earnings per share.

Slide six shows year over year EPS comparison. In total, second quarter diluted earnings per share was $8.15 an increase of 28% compared to the second quarter of twenty twenty four. This was driven by two factors: higher sales and improved segment performance, which contributed $0.80 of year over year benefit and a gain of $1.4 recognized on the divestiture of the Training Services business. Next, I'll provide updates on our forward outlook, starting with segment level guidance on slide seven. For sales, we are maintaining our top line outlook at AS and DS of low $13,000,000,000 and low $8,000,000,000 respectively.

Aeronautics sales reflect mid single digit annual growth, driven by the continued ramp on B-twenty one and Takimo as well as higher volume on F-thirty five and B-two. We continue to expect DS will achieve double digit sales growth this year, driven by Sentinel, IBCS and higher volume in our weapons business stemming from 2024 award volume. At Mission Systems, we are increasing our sales expectations to low to mid $12,000,000,000 based on the strength of their year to date results and continued growth on domestic and international programs throughout their portfolio, including airborne and ground based radar, EW and restricted programs. And at Space, we now project sales of mid to high $10,000,000,000 reflective of the award decision on the ESS program. With respect to operating margin rate, we are maintaining our margin rate expectations for AS, MS and Space.

At DS, we are increasing our margin rate expectations to mid-ten percent based on their notable Q2 results. At the company level, as shown on slide eight, we are narrowing the range on our top line outlook and expect organic sales growth of approximately 3% for the year. This outlook projects sales in the second half of the year to be higher than in the first half by approximately $2,500,000,000 This increase in revenue is driven by a few factors. First, we expect the Triad programs on B-twenty one, Sentinel and Columbia to collectively deliver roughly $750,000,000 in higher second half sales. B-twenty one LRIP Block III and Block V Advanced Procurement are expected to be awarded in Q4.

These awards will also include a significant amount of revenue recognition due to inventory liquidations for materials purchased to support production schedules. Meanwhile, the Sentinel and Columbia programs are expected to continue to ramp, including higher material receipts and subcontractor deliveries in the second half of the year. Another element of second half growth is the ramp on new recently awarded programs, including TACAMO, IBCS, International Ground Based Radars and multiple ammunition programs. Collectively, these new programs are expected to contribute nearly $700,000,000 of higher second half sales. And lastly, Q4 has historically been our strongest quarter of revenue generation, driven by production schedules and timing of materials.

We expect this normal seasonality to continue this year, contributing roughly $1,000,000,000 of higher second half sales. Altogether, we expect Q3 sales to be up 3% to 4% compared to Q2, with further acceleration in Q4 positioning us to deliver on our full year sales guidance. For segment operating income, we are increasing the guidance range by $50,000,000 at the midpoint, driven by higher margins at DS that I previously described. This reflects a company level segment OM rate of almost 11.4% in the second half. I'd reemphasize that excluding the B21 EAC adjustment in Q1, first half margins were also 11.4%.

MS is expected to be the driver of margin dollar growth in the second half. The MS profile is enabled by continued strong program performance, higher international sales and seasonal volume increases to higher margin production programs later in the year. With respect to earnings per share, we are increasing our guidance range, driven by higher segment operating income. This increase in operational performance is being partially offset by non operational item. While the reconciliation bill recently signed into law includes several provisions that benefit cash flow, it also modifies the treatment of certain R and D tax credits that increase our estimated tax rate.

As a result, we now expect a tax rate of high 17% for the year. Given the bill was approved in July, we expect an effective Q3 tax rate of approximately 21% to reflect the cumulative impacts to date. We are reaffirming our guidance for corporate unallocated expenses and expect roughly $100,000,000 of expense in both Q3 and Q4 due to timing of state taxes and normal seasonality. Taking all those elements into account, we are increasing our EPS guidance by $05 and now expect a range of $25 to $25.4 Lastly, with respect to cash, we are increasing our 2025 guidance range and now expect free cash flow of $3,050,000,000 to $3,350,000,000 This increase is driven by the revision to Section 174 in the tax code related to treatment of R and D expenditures, partially offset by the application of the corporate minimum tax. In the quarter, we generated $637,000,000 in free cash flow, a significant improvement compared to the first quarter.

We continue to expect the largest quarter of cash generation in the fourth quarter, consistent with our seasonal pattern in sales ramp. In addition, there are a few other unique items driving higher Q4 cash flows. First, as previously noted, reduced cash tax payments this year. Second, we have a higher than average level of milestone payments in the second half, including contract closeout payments at Space. And lastly, we expect a significant benefit from inventory liquidations, particularly in Aeronautics in Q4.

In summary, we had an outstanding quarter of operational and financial performance. Sales, margins, earnings per share and cash all increased meaningfully from Q1, with momentum that we expect to continue in the second half of the year. These results demonstrate the value of the Northrop Grumman portfolio, as well as our continued focus on disciplined program performance. We remain focused on delivering on our full year commitments while executing our business strategy and deploying our capital in value creating ways. With that, we'll open the call to questions.

Thank you. Our first question comes from Doug Arned with Bernstein. You may proceed.

You had a really strong quarter for margins as you described really, really good performance. But when you look at the guidance increase for the year, it's pretty small. I mean, if you look at least where I think many of us were expecting this to come out, the Q2 was really positive. Can you explain how that works given that you're also talking about maintaining this positive momentum from Q2 into the second half?

Absolutely, Doug. Thank you for the question. As mentioned in my comments, we did have very strong segment operating performance within the quarter, as you mentioned. One non operational item that offset that was the change regarding tax reform. And overall, reform was a positive change, increasing cash flow that we can invest in the business, provide opportunities for people, things of that nature.

However, due to general limitations on certain credits, as well as deductions related to certain R and D expenditures, The offset on operational performance was driven by that. It increased our effective tax rate. But overall, I would like to highlight the strong performance of the operations. If you look across the segments, very strong performance in line with expectations where we need them to deliver in order to meet the guidance range that we provided.

And then if I look forward and you look at the 2026 budget, he says sort of laid out combination of the administration's proposal plus reconciliation. There are big additions in funding for B21 and Sentinel. And what we're trying to understand is, if you look at that very strong funding profile, and how might we see an impact in your revenues and earnings in those two programs?

So, Doug, as you know, the overall budget environment is favorable for defense with the potential of a double digit increase in FY '26 when you take the FY '26 budget as well as reconciliation. And we do expect reconciliation, although it can be spent over a multi year period, to be loaded towards the front end of that period. With programs like E21 and Sentinel, as you know, are receiving significant increases, B21, 4,500,000,000.0 in funding in reconciliation, Sentinel a couple billion, and E2, which you didn't mention, with a billion and a half, we do expect those expenditures to be spread over a multi year period, but certainly provide tailwinds going into 2026 and that those expenditures would begin as early as this year.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Gavin Parsons with UBS. You may proceed. Great. Thanks. Good morning.

Kathy, I believe you said any agreement to accelerate b '21 further would would require further investment on your part, but it would also include the ability to to earn improved returns. I was hoping you could just go into a little bit more detail on that and and if that would allow you to reopen pricing on the LRIP or if that's only on future lots. Thanks.

Yes, Kevin. So, the important takeaway here is that the reconciliation bill now provides the funding for the expansion of production capacity for the B-twenty one. And so, we have entered into discussions as I have alluded to before, we were already working with the Air Force on plans to accelerate production capacity in now we are in discussions about how those funds will be used to make that happen and we are looking to get a fair and equitable business arrangement where we would be incentivized to invest in that production capacity and with that would come the opportunity to earn improved returns on both the remaining lots of LRIP and the NTE units which as you know already have some price in TE, but also have the ability to adjust based on inflation and other factors. Taking all of that into consideration, we're in discussions now, we should have more clarity in the coming months and we'll certainly share that with you as the business arrangement comes together.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Ronald Epstein with Bank of America. You may proceed.

Maybe if you could talk a little bit more about your international business. You said there was, what, 18% international sales growth in the quarter. And any details you could share with international backlog growth or how we should think about that? And how do you expect the growth to continue as NATO ex The U. S.

Starts to ramp up their spending towards that 3.5 goal for sort of the core defense piece that they've all sort of agreed to.

Yes, so as you know, there is a generational shift in defense spending that's underway in Europe And we had seen that reflected in very strong book to bill, 1.4 in international. And now, what we're seeing is that those awards are reflected in the strong sales growth that I mentioned, 18% year over year, 14% year to date. And so, as we look going forward, we expect those commitments that NATO countries have made to increase defense spending and general national security spending to 3.55% respectively of GDP to continue to provide a basis for the strong awards and sales growth within the company. It's broad based, it's certainly weapons and ammunition, but it's also integrated air and missile defense, E2, Triton, sensors. So, looking across our portfolio, three of our four sectors, MS, DS, and AS, all have a very strong international pipeline.

Got it. Then, if I can, a quick follow-up on in the quarter, you guys took a positive EAC on Sentinel. And I think that surprised everybody. I can't speak for everybody, obviously, but it surprised us for sure because of kind of the press around Sentinel. You talked a little bit about it in your prepared remarks.

Can you peel back the onion anymore on that? How that happened and what it means?

Yes, first, we are making substantial progress on the Sentinel weapon system, the milestones that we've talked about on prior calls about test milestones and continued maturation of design. There's one segment, the command and launch segment, where we had been paused on work while the Air Force was working through a restructure and revisit of both the acquisition approach and then working to rebaseline the entire program. And yet, all during that time, good progress was being made on all other aspects of the program and that continues. Now, we have been restarted on that work in the Command and Launch segment and we've made really good progress in the second quarter. I highlighted in my prepared remarks, some of that progress has come from a just open discussion about alternatives and options to accelerate the Sentinel program and working jointly with the department to evaluate and implement those changes and get specificity around the program plan forward has helped us to be able to move more quickly and remove barriers to performance.

So, I think it's really just a transformation in how the program is operating over these last couple of quarters that will provide us that strength and stability going forward as a joint team between the government, Northrop Grumman, and all of our teammates that has improved our outlook for the program meeting its milestones and we're just really encouraged with how it's progressing.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Scott Duchal with Deutsche Bank. You may proceed.

Kathy, can you share your latest framework on how we should be thinking about growth at Space Systems over the next couple of years, and then how you see the segment's growth comparing to the market as a whole? Obviously, a lot going on in terms of NASA budgets, DOD budgets, etcetera, in space. So just kind of a model picture for investors and curious for some clarity from yourself.

Yes, Scott. I would agree that it is the most dynamic of our market segments that we're operating in right now, both with NASA budgets in question. Of course, the Congress has provided support to continuing programs like ARTEMIS and specifically SLS and HALO, which is where we currently have work with NASA. I would remind you NASA is only about 3% of our overall sales as a company, so not a big driver of our space revenues, but nonetheless important missions that we're supporting. We also see changes in the Department of Defense architectures and those reflected in some pauses and reconsideration of acquisition strategies ongoing right now.

But if I cut through all of that noise in the near term, we do believe that budgets are going to continue to grow after a couple year period of relative flatness from the US Department of Defense on Space and we expect Golden Dome for America to be a significant driver of increased budget that would be available to our space sector and everything from space based interceptors to the broader support to a Golden Dome for America architecture. So, overall, we are optimistic that our space business has significant opportunity ahead would continue to grow after this year where we had talked about the business would be down but start to regrow into 2026 and we still have that expectation.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Christine Lewand with Morgan Stanley. You may proceed.

Hi. So so, Kathy, you know, NATO spending is increasing. That said, our European allies have been focused on growing its indigenous capabilities and shift away from The US in the longer term. In your prepared remarks, you talked about partnerships with some European players and having capacity. Lockheed has a partnership with Rheinmetall on missiles.

How do you make sure that Northrop Grumman would have a long term foothold in these markets once local capabilities catch up and they expand out their capabilities and capacity?

It really is about partnering as you noted and I noted in my prepared remarks. We have product lines that really lend themselves to working with local industry. For example, IDCS is an architecture where we provide hardware and software, but the key element of that architecture is that it can integrate indigenous systems that are part of the country's current air and missile defense, whether that be sensors or shooters, and the ability to do that sits locally within their industrial base. So, we can bring partners in to facilitate an example of that is in The UK where we're working with Marshall or The Republic Of Korea where we've just signed in a similar agreement with Hanwha. So, we really look at these local partnerships as a way to not only bring the best capability to the country, but support local industrial base.

And I've also talked in the past about co production, where we have expertise, but it's best for a local industrial partner to actually build the capability. Munitions is a key example of this and we just in the quarter signed another agreement, this one with provider, that helps us to transfer knowledge and expertise through a license but for them to actually have the ongoing ability to produce locally.

Thanks Kathy. Maybe as a follow-up, you've talked about the B-twenty one procurement acceleration, the restructuring of Sentinel and the increasing orders internationally. Mean these all showcase the strength of your portfolio. Taking a step back, when you've looked at where you've seen the most dollar changes for program funding, Which three programs are you most excited about today that changed versus maybe where expectations were a year ago?

So, the three that I'm most excited about are three that I mentioned that are in our portfolio today that would be B21 with the additional $4,500,000,000 mainly focused on production capacity expansion. That's something as you know that we have been working for a while and it's good to see it reflected in the reconciliation bill and to now be into discussions with the Air Force about implementing and bringing that vision to reality for the good of the Air Force. The second is Sentinel, where we have not needed additional budget increases this year, but now are seeing the opportunity in FY twenty six to really accelerate the program and begin working risk reduction activities that will lead to schedule and cost improvements potentially on the program. That's very exciting. And then, finally, E-2D, which has a billion and a half additional funding to support the program being extended partly for the Homeland Defense Mission, but also partly just as the only production capability that can match the E3 and be a replacement for that capability.

So, are three of our existing programs, but I'm equally excited about Old and Dome for America, which is a new set of opportunities, very significant funding there, as you know, in the reconciliation bill and our opportunity to pursue some of that work.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Robert Stallard with Vertical Research. You may proceed.

Kathy, just wanted to dig into Sentinel situation. It sounds like it's improved for you for sure. But as I understood it, a lot of the problems are on the silos. So is there sort of, some sort of breakout here where you can carry on an accelerated rate with the missile defense essentially, and then silos are completely independent? Or is this still a pacing item for you? Can the customer just buy the missiles regardless?

It is not. The way we look at it is all three segments of the program need to move forward and that's what is most exciting about what happened in the second quarter. We actually made progress such that the work was turned back on for the launch facilities or as you referenced them, the silos themselves. And so, we are back into designing those and really nailing down with the Air Force the appropriate requirements that will lead us to be able to move faster and potentially reduce costs on the program from the baseline that emerged coming out of the Nunn McCurdy's. So, that is the work that we're doing right now to bring that leg of the program in alignment with the others.

While we have continued to make good progress on the missile and the support and sustaining equipment, we are focused now on bringing the command and launch to that same level of maturity in design.

That's great. And then just a quick one for Ken. I was wondering if you could give us an idea of the annualized impact of this change to the R and D tax credit in terms of the P and L tax charge and also the cash? Thank you.

Yes. So when we think about cash flow in the future is we you should anticipate approximately $200,000,000 of cash tax benefit over the next few years. And in terms of the ETR impact relative to our P and L side, it was roughly about $50,000,000

Thank you. Our next question comes from Sheila Kahyaoglu with Jefferies. You may proceed.

Good morning, Kathy, Ken Todd. Maybe, Kathy, two part question on defense for you. First, just on the revenue growth profile, you called out solid rocket motors increasing to $25,000 by 2029 versus 13,000 today. Can you just talk about how defense systems revenue growth profile changes based on weapons commentary and international growth outlook? And then second, similar questions on Sentinel to Ron and Rob.

How does the maturation of the Command and Launch segment change the E and D margin profile for defense through the end of the decade when production starts?

Great, so let me start with your first question. And I do want to remind everyone that the 13,000 solid rocket motors to 25,000 is inclusive of small, medium, and large. Small and medium predominantly for our defense systems business and large for our space business and we've been investing in all three. The work on small and medium leads to increased opportunities for our tactical weapons, both second source missiles that we are not currently a provider, as well as growth on those that we are. In addition, we have multiple programs where we are the prime and an attack weapon ARGEM ER, and those will likely contribute significantly to growth.

Each of those have an international and a domestic component, so growth in US spending and expected for international. And then the last piece that we don't talk a lot about is hypersonics. We built the hypersonics integration facility in Elkton, Maryland, and we are also providing rocket motors for those weapons as well and expect that to be an area of growth well into the future. So, we have said in the past and I still believe it to be the case that Defense Systems is likely to have our highest sustained growth rate over these next several years, largely fueled by weapon systems, as well as our integrated air and missile defense, and I talked about the strength of that portfolio. Shifting to your second question on Sentinel and the EMD margin profile, as we looked at the program in the second quarter and the agreement that we reached with the customer on how the restructure will be accomplished, then also beyond the restructure the pathway to rebaseline and completing E and D.

Those agreements are what led us to have confidence to increase our overall booking rate based on our expectation for realizing incentives on the program during that phase. So, confidence increased based on increased certainty that we have through that agreement reached with the government. And now that certainty also translates into a better platform for the integrated Air Force and Northrop Grumman team to execute on the program. The turn back on of the design work on command and launch the pathway for taking the missile through design and testing and completing those milestones, all of which are leading us to have higher confidence and the ability to complete the EMD phase of the program.

Do we still think about Defense Systems as a 10% margin business on a go forward basis then?

So, we're not ready to provide any guidance beyond this year, but certainly we raised our guidance for the segment for this year and the drivers for that increased confidence certainly are fundamental. They are not one time items. I would have you wait until we give you some guidance for '26, but my expectation is that Defense Systems continues to perform very well and that the tailwinds for both international growth and the which is a mixed factor and performance are both leaning favorably for them.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Seth Seifman with JPMorgan. You may proceed.

Thanks very much, and good morning. I think you may have touched on the answers to these questions, but when you've talked about the out years before, Kathy, you've said B21 was going to grow but probably remain a high single digit percentage of company sales. Likewise for Sentinel at mid single digit. But now that we see this funding in the reconciliation bill, I don't know if it's possible to revise that outlook. And likewise for what it does for the $4,000,000,000 of cash flow in 2028.

Yeah, so depending on the final agreement for the production rate ramp on B21, we do now believe it could exceed the 10% of our total revenue in the future, but it's really early to provide any more definitive outlook. As I said, in the next couple of months, as we have clarity on the entire business arrangement, we would update that. The same is really true for our cash flow outlook as we think about the investments that we would make as part of this arrangement, the improvement in incentives that we would expect, we will look at all of that in combination to be able to update you. But it is our expectation that in the long run, these investments result in both better profitability and cash flow. And then, with Sentinel and how large it could become as part of the portfolio, I don't see it reaching that 10% of revenue in the next couple of years, despite the additional funding that we've received.

But certainly, as we move into the production phase of the program, which is now still several years out, I would expect at that time, we might revisit whether it becomes a larger part of the portfolio.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Richard Safran with Seaport Research Partners. You may proceed.

Northrop Grumman (NOC) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Company Participants