The 300 companies on this year’s list brought in over $12.5 trillion in revenue for the latest 12 months, with the median revenue figure at $24 billion.

America's Most Innovative Companies

AI is a major force shaping this year’s list—but it’s far from the only story.

World's Most Admired Companies

This ranking evaluates how Fortune 500 companies are deploying AI, and how technology leaders value those investments relative to industry peers.

Fortune AIQ 50

The corporations on our annual list of the world's 500 largest companies combined to generate $41.7 trillion in revenue over the past year.

Fortune Global 500

Almost $20 trillion in revenue—and a record-breaking $1.87 trillion in profits. Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive list of the biggest companies in America.

Fortune 500

The 300 companies on this year’s list brought in over $12.6 trillion in revenue for the latest 12 months, with the median revenue figure at $22 billion.

Leaders in all industries rely more than ever on Big Tech—and appreciate the giants that deliver, at scale, without drama.

The corporations on our annual list posted aggregate revenues of $41 trillion for the second year in a row.

Industry included in sector is aerospace and defense.

Fortune Sector Leaders: Aerospace and Defense

The Fortune 500, in its 70th year in 2024, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

The 200 companies on this list are transforming industries from the inside out.

The 26th edition of the list shows how much esteem Big Tech giants command among other business leaders.

The 25th Fortune World’s Most Admired Companies list suggests that tech giants’ peers respect them as much as ever.

The corporations on our annual list of the world’s largest companies delivered a record $41 trillion in aggregate revenues.

The 300 companies on this list are transforming industries from the inside out.

The Fortune 500, in its 69th year in 2023, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

Just as it dominates our economy, Big Tech now dominates Fortune’s annual ranking of corporate reputation.

Aggregate sales hit $37.8 trillion last year—an increase of 19%, the highest annual growth rate in the list’s history.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 68th running of the list.

After a year in which humanity leaned more heavily than ever on tech giants, see which companies topped Fortune's ranking of corporate reputation.

Total revenue for the world’s biggest companies fell 4.8% to $31.7 trillion this year—the first decline in half a decade.

<span data-sheets-value="{&quot;1&quot;:2,&quot;2&quot;:&quot;Operating profits for this Fortune 500 mainstay nudged higher as the aerospace and defense giant pulled in $53 billion in new business contracts last year. The crowning achievement came from its Space Systems unit, which landed a $13.3 billion missile-systems deal from the U.S. Air Force. Overall, sales jumped 9% year on year, enabling Northrop Grumman to leap 10 spots in the rankings. In January 2021, the company’s board authorized a new plan to buy back $3 billion in shares. The stock has been on a tear since then, far outperforming the S&amp;P 500.&quot;}" data-sheets-userformat="{&quot;2&quot;:12673,&quot;3&quot;:{&quot;1&quot;:0},&quot;10&quot;:2,&quot;11&quot;:4,&quot;15&quot;:&quot;Calibri, Arial&quot;,&quot;16&quot;:12}" data-sheets-textstyleruns="{&quot;1&quot;:0}{&quot;1&quot;:27,&quot;2&quot;:{&quot;6&quot;:1}}{&quot;1&quot;:34}">Operating profits for Northrop Grumman nudged higher as the aerospace and defense giant pulled in $53 billion in new business contracts last year. The crowning achievement came from its Space Systems unit, which landed a $13.3 billion missile-systems deal from the U.S. Air Force. Overall, sales jumped 9% year on year, enabling Northrop Grumman to leap 42 spots in the Global 500 rankings. In January 2021, the company’s board authorized a new plan to buy back $3 billion in shares. The stock has been on a tear since then, far outperforming the S&amp;P 500.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 67th running of the list.

F500-2021-86-Northrop Grumman

<span data-sheets-value="{&quot;1&quot;:2,&quot;2&quot;:&quot;Operating profits for this Fortune 500 mainstay nudged higher as the aerospace and defense giant pulled in $53 billion in new business contracts last year. The crowning achievement came from its Space Systems unit, which landed a $13.3 billion missile-systems deal from the U.S. Air Force. Overall, sales jumped 9% year on year, enabling Northrop Grumman to leap 10 spots in the rankings. In January 2021, the company’s board authorized a new plan to buy back $3 billion in shares. The stock has been on a tear since then, far outperforming the S&amp;P 500.&quot;}" data-sheets-userformat="{&quot;2&quot;:12673,&quot;3&quot;:{&quot;1&quot;:0},&quot;10&quot;:2,&quot;11&quot;:4,&quot;15&quot;:&quot;Calibri, Arial&quot;,&quot;16&quot;:12}" data-sheets-textstyleruns="{&quot;1&quot;:0}{&quot;1&quot;:27,&quot;2&quot;:{&quot;6&quot;:1}}{&quot;1&quot;:34}">Operating profits for this Fortune 500 mainstay nudged higher as the aerospace and defense giant pulled in $53 billion in new business contracts last year. The crowning achievement came from its Space Systems unit, which landed a $13.3 billion missile-systems deal from the U.S. Air Force. Overall, sales jumped 9% year on year, enabling Northrop Grumman to leap 10 spots in the rankings. In January 2021, the company’s board authorized a new plan to buy back $3 billion in shares. The stock has been on a tear since then, far outperforming the S&amp;P 500.

For an astounding 13th straight year, Apple claims the top spot in Fortune’s annual ranking of corporate reputation, based on a survey of almost 3,800 executives, directors, and analysts.

This year's Fortune Global 500 generated $33.3 trillion in revenues and $2.1 trillion in profits.

G500-2020-368-Northrop-Grumman

Northrop Grumman jumps up 48 spots on the Global 500 from last year, as it continues a decade-long turnaround. Revenue grew a solid 12.4%, though profits slumped more than 30%, in part due to operational challenges. One piece of pending news could help determine how long the company's growth streak continues: After a protracted competition with Boeing that included a regulatory inquiry by the Federal Trade Commission, Northrop has emerged as the de facto winner of the contract to upgrade the U.S. Air Force's fleet of intercontinental ballistic missiles. That contract, which is due to be formally awarded later in 2020, is worth $85 billion.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 66th running of the list.

F500-2020-096-Northrop-Grumman

Northrop vaults into the Fortune 100 this year, up 12 spots from last year, as it continues—or perhaps caps—a decade-long turnaround. Revenue grew a solid 12.4%, though profits slumped more than 30%, in part due to operational challenges. Northrop faced a threat in 2019 when rival Boeing dropped out of the competition for an $85 billion missile contract, and demanded that regulators intervene over Northrop’s 2018 purchase of rocket engine maker Orbital ATK. The Federal Trade Commission started an inquiry, but no further action followed. That set up a game-changing 2020 surprise: With Boeing out of the picture for the missile contract and Northrop the de facto winner, the Air Force said that it may award Northrop the deal ahead of schedule.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2019 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune Global 500 generated $27.7 trillion in revenues and $1.5 trillion in profits.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 65th running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2018 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 64th running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2017 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 63rd running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2016 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune Global 500 generated $27.6 trillion in revenues and $1.5 trillion in profits.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 62nd running of the list.

Business insiders have spoken: Asked which companies they most admire, more than 4,100 executives, directors, and analysts chose these top 50 All-Stars.

The world's 500 largest companies generated $31.2 trillion in revenues and $1.7 trillion in profits in 2014. Together, this year's Fortune Global 500 employ 65 million people worldwide and are represented by 36 countries.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 61st running of the list. Wal-Mart claims the top spot again. See who made the list.

Global business is back. After limping through a worldwide financial crisis and economic slowdown, the 500 largest companies ranked by revenues shattered all sorts of performance records in 2013: They racked up combined revenues of $31.1 trillion, up 2.5% from 2012, and profits soared 27% to nearly $2 trillion. China’s 95 companies (up from 89 last year) posted $5.8 trillion in revenues. The U.S. has four fewer companies on the list than last year but remains (for now) the country leader, with 128 corporations on the list—including No. 1 Wal-Mart Stores—reporting $8.6 trillion in revenues. 

Wal-Mart stayed on top as its sales crept closer to half-a-trillion dollars. Apple moved into the top five. And UnitedHealth Group continued its steady climb. 

Key Financials (last Fiscal Year)

Revenues ($M)

Profits ($M)

Assets ($M)

Total Stockholder Equity ($M)

Profit Ratios

Profit as % of Revenues

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholder Equity

Earnings Per Share (last Fiscal Year)

Earnings Per Share ($)

EPS % Change (from prior fiscal year)

EPS % Change (5 year annual rate)

EPS % Change (10 year annual rate)

Total Return

Total Return to Investors (last year)

Total Return to Investors (5 year, annualized)

Total Return to Investors (10 year, annualized)

Sector

Industry

Current All-Star Rank

Previous All-Star Rank

Industry Rank

Previous Industry Rank

Overall Score

Innovation

People Management

Use of Corporate Assets

Social Responsibility

Quality of Management

Financial Soundness

Long-Term Investment Value

Quality of Products/Services

Global Competitiveness

Strongest Dimension

Years on list

Previous rank

State

Northrop Grumman, founded in 1939, is a global aerospace and defense technology company in the United States, Asia/Pacific, Europe, and internationally. The company is structured into four primary segments. The aeronautics systems segment is responsible for the design, development, manufacture, integration, and sustainment of aircraft systems. This division specializes in both manned and unmanned aircraft, including high-altitude long-endurance strategic ISR systems, vertical takeoff and landing tactical ISR systems, strategic long-range strike aircraft, tactical fighters, and airborne battle management and command and control systems. In the defense systems segment, Northrop Grumman focuses on tactical weapons and missile defense solutions. This division also provides sustainment, modernization, and training services for manned and unmanned aircraft and electronics systems. Their product range includes integrated command and control battle management systems, precision strike weapons, high-speed air-breathing and hypersonic systems, high-performance gun systems, ammunition, and advanced fuzes. Additionally, they offer logistics support, sustainment, operations, modernization, and warfighter training services. The mission systems segment specializes in command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (C4ISR) systems. This division develops and produces technologies including radar systems, electro-optical/infrared and acoustic sensors, electronic warfare systems, advanced communications and network systems, cyber solutions, intelligence processing systems, navigation systems, and maritime power, propulsion, and payload launch systems. The Space Systems segment focuses on space-related technologies and systems. This includes the development and production of satellites, spacecraft systems, subsystems, sensors, and payloads. The division also works on ground systems, missile defense systems and interceptors, launch vehicles and related propulsion systems, and strategic missiles.

Q1 2026

Q4 2025

Q3 2025

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Q4 2024

Northrop Grumman (NOC): Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings

legacy

Northrop Grumman

northrop grumman

Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to Northrop Grumman's First Quarter 2026 Conference Call. Today's call is being recorded. My name is Josh, and I will be your operator today. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. I would now like to turn the call over to your host, Mr. Todd Ernst, Vice President, Investor Relations. Mr. Ernst, please proceed.

Good morning, and welcome to Northrop Grumman's First Quarter 2026 Conference Call. Before we start, matters discussed on today's call, including guidance and outlooks for 2026 and beyond, reflect the company's judgment based on information available at the time of this call. They constitute forward-looking statements pursuant to Safe Harbor provisions of federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including those noted in today's press release and our SEC filings. These risks and uncertainties may cause actual company results to differ materially. Today's call will include non-GAAP financial measures that are reconciled to our GAAP results in our earnings release. In addition, we'll refer to a presentation that is posted to our investor relations website. On today's call are Kathy Warden, our Chair, CEO, and President, and John Greene, our CFO. At this time, I'd like to turn the call over to Kathy. Kathy?

Thanks, Todd. Good morning, everyone, and thanks for joining us today. The Northrop Grumman team is proud of the work we do in support of the world's most important national security imperative. As we are seeing in recent military operations, many of our systems are playing a critical role in successfully executing the mission and returning our service members home safely. We contribute enduring assets like the B-2 Stealth Bomber and the E-2D, which continue to demonstrate tremendous value decades after their first flights. Our ISR and C2 systems provide the needed intelligence to plan and conduct successful operations across all domains, and our munitions are instrumental to execute these missions. We share in the responsibility and urgency of our customers to provide our nation and allies with the best technologies in the world, and we are increasingly focused on the speed with which we deliver them.

With this goal in mind, we've been investing in our business for several years to build capability and capacity and provide the solutions at the scale our customers need to compete in this environment. In fact, in the last two years, we've opened over 20 new facilities and added more than 2 million sq ft of manufacturing space across the United States. Since the beginning of 2026, we have agreed with our customers on plans to accelerate the Sentinel program, increase the rate at which we build the B-21, become a second source supplier of solid rocket motors on several programs, and ramp our rate of production on another handful of programs. We're just getting started. We are in discussions on numerous additional opportunities to help achieve the department's goal for speed and scale.

Central to all these agreements is our partnership with our customers as we transform the way we work together. Our teams are aligned in unprecedented ways to deliver on our commitments and enable our armed forces to win. Earlier this morning, we released our first quarter results, which reflect strong demand, solid operating performance, and progress we are making on key programs. First quarter organic sales were up 5%, a great start to the year, and consistent with our full-year expectations. Sales were largely driven by growth in our work on modernizing the triad, which is a top priority in the U.S. National Defense Strategy. We had another quarter of solid bookings, reinforcing the foundation for continued growth over the coming quarters and into next year. Our results and our confidence in our outlook are supported by a robust demand environment driven by rising global defense budgets.

Countries around the world are recognizing a fundamental shift in the geopolitical environment, leading to global military spending rising approximately 40% over the past decade. It's expected to continue to rise as Western nations modernize and grow their forces. In the Middle East particularly, there is a heightened sense of urgency for our solutions such as IBCS, G/ATOR, and Counter-UAS solutions. In the U.S., $1 trillion has been appropriated for defense in fiscal year 2026, and funding from this budget and reconciliation are starting to flow to industry. Earlier this month, the administration submitted a $1.5 trillion defense budget request for fiscal year 2027. The budget emphasizes modernization and represents a 44% increase over current funding levels. The budget proposal is made up of several components with a base budget of $1.1 trillion.

The base budget alone, compared with the FY 2026 base budget, represents nearly a 30% increase, and it sustains support for many of our key programs, including B-21, Sentinel, IBCS, E-2D, and numerous restricted programs. If enacted, the budget request for 2027 would bring spending to about 5% of GDP. While this represents an increase to the 3% we've seen in recent years, it's closer to the levels we saw during the Cold War. We are encouraged by the strong bipartisan support for strengthening U.S. defense budgets, aligned to the global security challenges we are facing. We look forward to working with policymakers as they consider this budget request. In response to these high levels of global demand for our solutions, the administration is working closely with industry to provide clear, long-term demand signals through structured production frameworks.

Let me share details of some of the agreements I referenced earlier in the call. Our Defense Systems business growth is fueled by the growing demand for solid rocket motors, smart munitions, ammunition, and tactical missiles. We are a key SRM supplier on more than 15 systems, including GMLRS, PrSM, Hellfire, and AIM-9X, among others. We are taking the necessary steps to qualify as a supplier on other high-demand systems, such as PAC-3. To position the company for this growing market, we invested more than $2 billion over the past several years in SRM ammunition technologies and in modernizing our facilities. This proactive approach established a strong U.S. manufacturing base with capacity available today to support our customers' growing demand for critical munitions. Our tactical SRM production capacity has already doubled, and we have further expansion, which will be completed by 2027.

These modern production facilities provide us modular, adaptable production lines that can produce multiple products, allowing us to flex with demand. Overall, our weapons business is nearing 10% of total company sales and is positioned to grow at a pace well above the company average. In addition to a focus on munitions, we and the Department of War remain committed to accelerating the triad modernization. For Sentinel, we are working closely with the Air Force and making significant progress advancing missile development, command and control systems, and maturing the design and construction approach. In March, we broke ground on a prototype of the Sentinel launch silo tube, which will validate the structural design and construction approach, a key enabler to accelerate fielding. We expect to reach the Milestone B decision later this year, first flight in 2027, and initial operating capability in the early 2030s.

We expect strong growth from Sentinel throughout the year as we ramp up on the new baseline, with the program already delivering double-digit growth in the first quarter. On the B-21 program, we are moving through testing at an aggressive pace, including aerial refueling trials beginning earlier this month. We are on a path through both testing and production for B-21 to arrive at Ellsworth Air Force Base in 2027. Consistent with this progress, we received the Lot 4 LRIP award in the first quarter, closely following the Lot 3 award received in Q4 last year. As previously announced, we finalized an agreement with the Air Force to increase the annual production rate of the B-21 by 25%. This agreement demonstrates the strong operational requirements for the platform and confidence in our team to accelerate the delivery of this next-generation capability for the warfighter.

The production ramp-up will be supported by customer funding included in last year's reconciliation package, alongside approximately $2.5 billion of company-funded investment, primarily for new facilities. These investments will be phased in over multiple years. Importantly, this agreement accelerates production for our customer, enhances the program's long-term economics, and creates the potential for a larger program of record. We're pleased to have this agreement in place and excited for this transformative technology to begin arriving on Air Force bases next year. In another area of our portfolio, widespread adoption of ballistic missiles and drones by potential adversaries are reinforcing the urgent need for air and missile defense capabilities. Demand in this area has been exceptionally strong, and today, our missile defense business accounts for nearly 10% of company sales. Northrop Grumman is well-positioned to capitalize on significant opportunities such as Golden Dome, as well as other program areas.

Our advanced interceptors, sensor systems, and command and control technologies remain critical to strengthening layered defense architectures. Shortly after the close of the quarter, we secured an award to accelerate development of the Glide Phase Interceptor, bringing the total contract value to $1.3 billion. GPI is designed to intercept hypersonic missiles that can evade traditional missile defense systems, a critical capability given the proliferation of hypersonic weapons. Before concluding, I'd like to highlight our role in the historic Artemis II launch. It's a reflection of the diversity of our space business, which extends across a wide range of missions.

Two Northrop Grumman-built solid rocket motors generated an astounding 7.2 million pounds of thrust, over 75% of the rocket's total thrust, to propel the SLS rocket and the astronauts on their journey around the Moon. We are incredibly proud of our team, and I'd like to congratulate NASA and the Artemis II crew on a successful mission. In summary, we continue to see an opportunity-rich environment. Our investments in our business, rigor in program execution, and speed with which we are bringing innovative solutions to our customers gives us confidence in our position today and into the next decade. When coupled with our strong backlog and unprecedented opportunity set, we're optimistic we can continue growing our business and creating value for all of our stakeholders. I'll now ask John to cover our first quarter financial results. John?

Thank you, Kathy, and good morning, everyone. I'll start with our first quarter segment results on slide four. We continue to experience robust demand for our products and capabilities. Awards totaled $9.8 billion in Q1, and we ended the period with $96 billion in backlog. First quarter sales were $9.9 billion, up 4% year-over-year. Organic sales increased 5%. On the bottom line, segment operating income increased to over $1 billion and segment margins improved to 10.8%. First quarter results were driven by higher sales and improved performance in Aeronautics Systems. AS sales increased by 17%, driven by higher sales on B-21 and other restricted programs. TACAMO sales were also higher as the program continues to ramp. Higher sales on B-21 reflected the inclusion of the agreement with the Air Force to expand production capacity, which I'll address in a moment.

The sales increases were partially offset by lower volume on F/A-18. On the bottom line, first quarter AS operating margins improved to 9.3%. The increase was driven by the absence of the B-21 loss provision booked in the first quarter of 2025. As Kathy mentioned, we are pleased to have an agreement in place to increase the production rate on the B-21 program. To support the acceleration of aircraft deliveries, we agreed to sell an aircraft to the Air Force that was previously planned to be utilized as a company-owned test asset. The asset sale accelerated revenue into the quarter but does not change the total number of aircraft we expect to deliver on the LRIP phase of the program. Additionally, after reviewing our profitability estimates on the LRIP phase of the program, which now includes the agreement, there were no significant changes to the EAC.

We had some increased production cost on earlier lots, which were offset by improved profitability on the remainder of the program. With the agreement in place, we are accelerating the program and have an opportunity to earn improved returns over a multi-year period. Moving to DS. Q1 sales increased 5% year-over-year. Organic sales increased 10%. This was driven by higher volume on Sentinel as the program continues to ramp. Sales were also higher due to increased volume on tactical solid rocket motors and Integrated Battle Command programs. First quarter operating margins at DS were solid at 9.7%. Mission Systems' first quarter sales increased by 2%, driven by increased volume on restricted airborne radar and marine programs. These increases were partially offset by lower volume on SABR and electronic warfare programs. MS operating income increased by 20%, driven by a higher level of net favorable earnings adjustments.

This increased their first quarter OM rate to 15.1%. In the Space segment, first quarter sales and operating income were down compared to the prior year. This was driven by two factors. First, the NGI program recognized $98 million in the first quarter sales last year as part of the contract closeout. This created a year-over-year headwind in Q1 this year. Secondly, we recognized an unfavorable earnings adjustment of $71 million on the GEM 63XL program. This adjustment lowered sales and operating income in the period. Performance elsewhere in the space portfolio was strong, with growth on SDA programs and restricted space. Turning to earnings per share on slide five. First quarter diluted EPS was $6.14, up substantially compared to the prior year. This was driven by higher sales and segment operating income, partially offset by lower net pension income.

In terms of cash flow, the first quarter reflected a use of approximately $1.8 billion, in line with the prior year. Consistent with our historical patterns, we expect cash flows to ramp throughout the year with the most significant cash generation in Q4. We expect CapEx to follow the same pattern as we continue to invest to support the strong demand environment and our future growth. As I indicated on the fourth quarter call, we repaid $527 million of fixed-rate debt in Q1. We ended the quarter with over $2 billion of cash on the balance sheet. Turning to our 2026 guidance, we are reaffirming our outlook for sales, earnings, and cash. We ended the first quarter with positive momentum and continue to expect full-year results within the existing guidance ranges. This includes full-year sales between $43.5 billion and $44 billion.

We continue to expect sales to accelerate throughout the year, similar to the cadence in 2025. For the second quarter, we expect high single-digit sequential sales growth. For the full year, we continue to expect broad-based sales growth across the portfolio. Segment operating income guidance reflects continued strong performance and a low- to mid-11% margin rate. Margins are expected to improve over the course of the year, driven by strong performance, production timing, and mix. Our capital deployment strategy remains focused on driving growth, reinvesting in the business to scale capacity, and maximizing shareholder value. This includes an additional $200 million we expect to invest this year to support the increased production capacity on B-21. As a result, we now expect $1.85 billion in 2026 capital expenditures. However, we are maintaining the free cash flow guidance range of $3.1 billion-$3.5 billion.

Given the increased capital investments, we are working to offset the free cash flow impacts. To summarize, we continue to generate strong financial results. I'm confident that we are well-positioned for continued profitable growth and value creation. Before we open the call for questions, I'd like to take a moment to congratulate Todd on his upcoming retirement at the end of this month. We appreciate his contribution over the past seven years. Todd has been a highly valued team member and a trusted business partner. We wish him well as he embarks on the next chapter. With that, let's open the call for your questions.

Thank you. As a reminder, to ask a question, please press star one one on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press star one one again. Please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. One moment for questions. Our first question comes from Robert Stallard with Vertical Research. You may proceed.

First of all, thanks, Todd, for all your help over the years. It's been much appreciated. Second, on the B-21, Kathy, you've got this 25% production capacity situation sorted out now. I was wondering if you could give us some idea of how the timeline progresses here in terms of Northrop Grumman spending on CapEx, then how the production flows through. Also, if you've got protections in here against a B-2 style curtailment. Thank you.

Yes, Rob. We expect $200 million or so of CapEx this year, and that's why we reflected that increase in our CapEx guidance for 2026. As we've said before, we do expect the majority of the capital expenditure to happen in the 2027, 2028, 2029 time frame and largely be completed this decade. The additional capacity that's coming online does give us a meaningful increase in throughput, which will generate revenue over the life of the program. But as I've just stated, it takes a while for us to get that capacity online. You should expect the revenue profile to follow the production facility completion.

Then on B-2? Oh, sorry, why it's not like the B-2.

In terms of this contract, we have a committed quantity on the contract, and we know that the Air Force is considering increasing the program of record as we sit here today. That decision hasn't been taken, but we do believe that there is strong support by the administration for this capability that manifests itself in their commitment to the triad modernization in the U.S. National Defense Strategy. We believe that it is a reflection over multiple administrations of the need for this platform as an effective deterrent, and as we've seen recently with the B-2, in conducting of military operations.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Gautam Khanna with TD Securities. You may proceed.

Yes. Good morning. I was just wondering if you could elaborate on some of the Sentinel developments that you mentioned on IOC and how that program is progressing with respect to timing. Congrats to Todd as well.

Thank you. For the Sentinel program, in partnership with the Air Force in this past quarter, we have agreed to an acceleration of the program that would have completion of Milestone B later this year and then would allow us to move forward with the program, as I said, to first flight in 2027 and an initial operating capability early in the 2030s. We are doing a series of things together with the Air Force to enable this schedule acceleration. One, I mentioned, that got started in the quarter is a prototype of the missile launch silo, and that will help us to understand and further increase the fidelity of our design for the silo itself. That's just one example of numerous things that are happening across the program to mature the design and progress toward that first flight milestone that I talked about in 2027.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Peter Arment with Baird. You may proceed.

Yeah, thanks. Good morning, Kathy, John. Congrats, Todd.

Hey, Kathy, thanks for the color on international. Just maybe if we could just click on that a little bit. You're up 20% in 2025. Just a lot has changed in the last few months. Can you talk a little bit about opportunities? Is there anything on international that can be pulled to the left? I know you're expecting a healthy book-to-bill of over 1 this year. Just any dynamics there that can accelerate the timing?

Peter, we see the opportunity to accelerate timing on international in areas where urgency has increased over the last couple of months. I specifically called out in my remarks the Middle East, where clearly the conflict with Iran has created a heightened sense of urgency, and we are seeing those opportunities move to the left. With that said, we see high demand for products that we produce across the entire globe, including Europe. Our team is working in any ways possible to accelerate demand, and turning that demand into sales. What we see, though, is international does tend to have a longer cycle than domestic. That has not changed. Just in terms of the steps we must go through to get that demand signal translated into contract. We are working with the department on a number of things that help to accelerate export approval.

We are looking at aggregating international demand. Those are all positive steps forward in the way the process is working that could lead to acceleration. I largely see those things impacting us beyond this year.

Got it. Just as a follow-up, you mentioned missile defense is roughly 10% of your overall revenue mix today. Can you talk a little bit about opportunities in the counter-drone solution area? Obviously, we've seen a lot of focus on lower cost solutions. How do we think about Northrop's position there? Thanks. Thanks, Kathy.

Yeah. We have opportunities in the counter-drone, including low-cost solutions that are based off of work we've been doing in that arena for a number of years, programs like our FAAD C2 program, and even IBCS is effective in connecting sensors and shooters in that counter-drone space. We have seen, as I have shared before, an increase in demand both from the U.S. and international. We expect the international contribution to be greater even than the domestic in Counter-UAS solutions. We see that developing over the next couple of years. We are already seeing some revenue today in that space. As I noted, now nearly 10% of the company's sales is in missile defense, which is a significant increase from where we were just a few years ago.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Mariana Pérez Mora with Bank of America. You may proceed.

Thank you for taking my question. Good morning, everyone, and congratulations, Todd.

My question is going to be around Space Systems. Apart from the GEM 63 impact, are there any programs that you could see at a kind of negative EAC type of approach, and how that could affect the underlying margins for this segment going forward, particularly as we think about what you just mentioned before, the strength on missile defense and all the MDA programs, the GPI award you got, but also some changes at NASA on Gateway. Thank you.

Yeah. Mariana, thanks. This is John. I'll take that. The space sector is actually performing pretty darn well. The book-to-bill, very, very strong. Came in last year at about 1.3, that sets the business up for future sales. Now, you do know that the cycle is a little longer in this space than other parts of our business. In terms of kind of your specifics on the EAC, we took a look at GEM 63, put our best estimate of what we thought the cost and impact of that would be. As we looked through the rest of the portfolio, we were comfortable in the quarter that there wasn't anything else significant that gave rise to any significant negative or positive EAC. Overall, we have strong margins and the business was actually able to close some of that pressure created by the GEM 63 EAC put onto the portfolio.

Should we expect that margin strength to remain for the remainder of the year at space? How should we think about margin trends, I don't know, three, five years from now?

Yeah. In terms of for the rest of the year, yeah, we're comfortable with the position. As you noted, we didn't pull off the guide on margin, and that's because we feel like there's strength in the portfolio. As we look forward, that whole arena is evolving significantly. What I would say is, you take a look at the technology and the risk associated with it. Over time, it should command a higher margin rate, but it'll be subject to the competitive environment and capacity that's available.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Kristine Liwag with Morgan Stanley. You may proceed.

Great. Good morning, everyone. Good morning, Kathy, John, and Todd. Congrats on your retirement.

It's maybe a high-level question. Kathy, when you look at the backlog of $96 billion, it's near record, providing sales coverage for over two years. Mid-single-digit growth seems reasonable in a more normal environment. In the past few years, you've called out, there's urgency now in the geopolitical environment, and it seems like things continue to deteriorate. We're seeing the Pentagon seek out new players, and the White House had called out potentially firing up the Freedom's Forge from the auto industry to increase capacity. Can you talk and give more color about how you think about overall output for Northrop Grumman? Where are the areas of bottleneck, and what has to happen for the company to deliver on double-digit growth?

Sure, Kristine. We are seeing an opportunity-rich environment, as I said. It's only the first quarter of 2026, and we now are just starting to see reconciliation dollars flow into our contracts. Our performance this quarter was in line with our full-year guide of mid-single digit. To your question, if we were to see a higher sales growth, it would come from our bidding on numerous new opportunities. We would expect to continue to see a high competitive win rate on those opportunities. We'd also need to see an accelerated ramp on the demand for our missile components. I talked about solid rocket motors earlier on the call. We have the capacity. We need to get that on contract and start producing. We need to convert our international pipeline to sales, as I also referenced earlier in response to Peter's question.

Our suppliers need to be able to scale with us, and we are doing the work to remove those bottlenecks in our supply chain, first by identifying them, second by helping those suppliers to resource their own scaling and to have the capacity that we need from them. We're, of course, working on all of these strategies to increase our growth rate beyond the mid-single digits. I have a lot of confidence in our longer-term outlook for sales based on the growing backlog, as you've said, and the opportunity to add to that backlog this year. I think the real question is timing. When do we reach that inflection point? It's based on all of the factors that I just shared with you.

Super helpful. If I could follow up on one of the programs that potentially could materialize this year. The Chief of Naval Operations said yesterday that, quote, "One of the two companies vying for the F/A-XX contract lacks the capacity to deliver the fighter on time." End quote. With the potential down select in August for this program, can you discuss how you're thinking about Northrop's positioning on this? If you are selected, how should we think about the potential upside to 2026 outlook? To your point on the funding for the program, is the funding for this program clear to provide upside potentially for 2026? Thank you.

Yes. As you know, this is a good example of one of those competitive opportunities I just mentioned, and we do expect the department to make an award selection in the third quarter. We are confident in our ability to deliver our solution to the Navy. We and our suppliers are prepared to bring the workforce and infrastructure that's needed to execute the program. Our track record on B-21 demonstrates that ability to deliver a complex aircraft on schedule. Regarding the financials, we'd expect upside to the sales and earnings from our current guidance if we are entrusted to build the F/A-XX, and it would be a top priority for our company to do so.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Sheila Kahyaoglu with Jefferies. You may proceed.

Thank you. Good morning, Kathy and John, and thank you, Todd, for everything over the years. Kathy, in your prepared remarks, you gave us lots of color on the growth drivers of the missiles. You said missile defense is 10%, weapons at 10%. Can you maybe also size B-21 and Sentinel? How do we think about these four growth drivers from both a revenue and earnings perspective?

Sure. Let me start with Sentinel. The program is about 6%-7% of company revenue today, and we expect it to grow low double digits this year, which is in line with how it performed in the first quarter. We then expect it to continue to grow annually, so growing toward that 10% of revenue over time. The next real inflection point for the program is when we start to have long lead for production, which we expect later this decade. For the B21 program, it is nearing 10% of revenue. With this accelerated production rate, we expect that it will likely, over the next several years, begin to exceed 10% of company revenue, and certainly sets the program up for enduring growth as well.

Can you maybe talk about just the growth you expect in weapons and missile defense? How do we think about those and just the EBIT growth as well, if you can?

Yes. For weapons, we have said we expect that to continue to be one of, if not the fastest-growing segment of our business. It is a set of opportunities that we have on the munitions where we are currently qualified to provide components like solid rocket motors. It's also our prime position as a weapons integrator that we expect to grow over time as programs like AARGM-ER and Stand-in Attack Weapon mature into production. That part of the portfolio today in aggregate is also about 10%, but we expect it to be one of the fastest growers, as I said, and proportionally become larger over these next several years. The growth rate will be somewhat dependent on how many new programs we add to the portfolio.

Maybe just a little more context on that. Most of that work is in our Defense Systems business, and you can see the guide that we provided at the beginning of this year in terms of the growth that we'll see there. Approaching 10%. Sentinel, as Kathy said, about 6% of total sales. It's about a third of the sales in the Defense Systems guide. That'll help you triangulate what we think the drivers are there, and then also support the acceleration of potential growth into the future.

Sheila, you also asked about margins. The margin profile on Sentinel, B-21 and our weapons portfolio are all expected to increase as we move into production, because as I stated, obviously all of them are in various stages of development at the moment.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Seth Seifman with JPMorgan. You may proceed.

Hey, thanks very much, and good morning, everyone.

Wanted to ask on B-21 and the impact of the production agreement. I think you mentioned some pluses and minuses in terms of the estimate. I know you've noted before that the agreement could potentially lead to higher profitability on the LRIP units. Should we assume that higher profitability on the LRIP units and reversal of charges is something that's still a possibility depending on company performance over the next several years? Or should we be thinking about the increased profitability coming more on the NTE units and beyond?

Yeah. I'll take that one. As you look at the program, first, the agreement we reached with the Air Force was a great outcome for both the company and the customer. As that agreement plays out, a portion of that, certainly a good portion of it, will be subject to our execution on the LRIP phase. Based on how it came together, there was no meaningful change in the overall EAC. There was some increased production cost that was offset with increased profitability in later phases of the program. Positive overall.

What we believe will be the case is as the program matures, our manufacturing capability will continue to improve. Production rates certainly improve, and it gives us an opportunity to expand margins and hopefully sales with the increased rate of production.

Okay. Great. Thanks. Just as a follow-up, I guess, after this year, there's probably $2 billion+ of incremental B-21 CapEx over 2027, 2028, 2029. When we think about the 2028 cash flow target, you're able to offset the impact of incremental B-21 CapEx this year, but it's obviously going to be in the future. How should we think about the ability to offset that?

Yeah. That's a substantial investment. What we did do is we guided and held our 2026 cash flow guidance. We intentionally didn't give guidance on 2027 or 2028 for two reasons: large awards outstanding, one of which we'll hear at the, hopefully sometime in the third quarter. Then also the investment we're making, the $2.5 billion investment we're making, that will play out. The lion's share of that'll be in 2027 and 2028. As we roll things forward, we'll take a look at what the free cash flow looks like. Not to be lost on the audience is the cash generation power of this business, and it will continue to generate substantial free cash flows. The investment will be subject to the opportunities we see.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Richard Safran with Seaport Research Partners. You may proceed.

Kathy, John, good morning. Todd, congrats to you.

This question, it could be for either Kathy or John. Could you talk generally about the contracting environment overall? I'm wondering if you're seeing more favorable environment. Specifically, are you seeing, for example, contracts or revised contract language with award or incentive fees or other incentives for good execution? If so, I'm wondering if you could talk a little bit about what you think that might mean for margins and cash. Thanks.

Rich, we are seeing the department engage with industry in several positive ways. One is the sense of urgency to get work on contract. Two is the desire to give a long-term sustained demand signal to industry and commitments around demand to both help us plan, but also to drive down costs that come with change or production gaps if there isn't certainty of demand. The other area is just in the mechanisms for contracting themselves. We're seeing more use of OTAs than other non-traditional contracting mechanisms.

All of these are positive for industry, and I don't see a desire by the department to push industry profitability down. It's quite the contrary, to help reduce costs that benefit both the customer and industry profitability and place incentives on contracts to drive early delivery, which again, is in everyone's best interest. I see a real alignment here and an opportunity for us to work with the department to create better economics for industry and the government.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Scott Mikus with Melius Research. You may proceed.

Morning, Kathy. Backlogs for you and your peers are already elevated, and it seems like a lot of the reconciliation funding from the One Big Beautiful Bill is yet to be put on contract. We also could have a $1.5 trillion defense budget, another supplemental for Operation Epic Fury. The demand signals are great, but are we starting to see European customers become wary about ordering equipment from U.S. companies, given that they can't actually be 100% certain when they'll receive the equipment?

Scott, there's definitely a desire for European countries to buy U.S. product, and we are still seeing robust demand there. There is a sensitivity to buy local, if possible, if there is a comparable product that can meet the requirements. There is a sensitivity around timelines for U.S. companies to be able to deliver, particularly given the increased demand from the U.S. and the priority that we are placing on ensuring that we are delivering on those commitments.

For the Northrop Grumman portfolio, specifically, we have been investing in capacity. I talked about the 20 facilities that we have opened in the last 24 months, the over 2 million sq ft of manufacturing space that we've added. This gives us the capacity to do both. We are not finding ourselves needing to trade, whether we can meet U.S. commitments or European commitments. We can and are supplying demand for both, and we foresee the ability to continue to do that.

Okay. Then the administration has also talked about trying to increase significantly the number of space-related FMS approvals. Are you starting to see the administration speed up that process? Are you engaged with international customers about building a pipeline of opportunities for your Space Systems segment?

We are engaged with international customers related to space capabilities, and we see that pipeline growing. We have seen some contract awards. We, in the quarter, announced a relationship with a Hungarian company and are pursuing work there. We are starting to see the maturation of that demand signal turning into pipeline and even contract award. I would say that it is the business that has the least international pipeline of our four segments, but it's growing and we expect five, 10 years from now, international to be a key contributor to our space business, just as it is in our other three segments.

All right. Thank you. Congrats to Todd on the retirement.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Scott Deuschle with Deutsche Bank. You may proceed.

Hey, good morning. John, is the customer providing any incremental cash advances or working capital support to help offset some of these increased capital investments in the B-21 program?

Let me answer the question this way that, we're making significant investment to support the program and the customer's making significant investments to support the program. The cash flow timing related to the program loosely will align with the investment rate, but there's certainly components of it that will not. That's probably about as much detail as I can get into on the nature of the cash flows related to the program, given the classified nature of the contract and the program itself.

I'll just add that the deal improves the economics for the program for the government and Northrop Grumman. When we look at the return on invested capital over the life of this program, this deal has improved that outlook. For the government, we are able to produce and deliver capability faster. In our view and the Air Force's view, this is a win-win, both contributing and both benefiting.

Okay. Kathy, for the life of the program, do you see the ROIC now meaningfully above your cost of capital?

Northrop Grumman (NOC) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Company Participants