This ranking evaluates how Fortune 500 companies are deploying AI, and how technology leaders value those investments relative to industry peers.

Fortune AIQ 75

The companies on the Global 500 employ 70.2 million people, and their revenue represents more than one-third of the world’s GDP.

Fortune Global 500

With a combined revenue of $21 trillion and $2.1 trillion in profits, the 2026 Fortune 500 is the definitive list of America's largest companies.

Fortune 500

The 300 companies on this year’s list brought in over $12.5 trillion in revenue for the latest 12 months, with the median revenue figure at $24 billion.

America's Most Innovative Companies

AI is a major force shaping this year’s list—but it’s far from the only story.

World's Most Admired Companies

Fortune AIQ 50

The corporations on our annual list of the world's 500 largest companies combined to generate $41.7 trillion in revenue over the past year.

Almost $20 trillion in revenue—and a record-breaking $1.87 trillion in profits. Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive list of the biggest companies in America.

The 300 companies on this year’s list brought in over $12.6 trillion in revenue for the latest 12 months, with the median revenue figure at $22 billion.

Leaders in all industries rely more than ever on Big Tech—and appreciate the giants that deliver, at scale, without drama.

The corporations on our annual list posted aggregate revenues of $41 trillion for the second year in a row.

Industries included in the sector are banks, insurance, and real estate companies.

Fortune Sector Leaders: Financials

The Fortune 500, in its 70th year in 2024, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

The 200 companies on this list are transforming industries from the inside out.

The 26th edition of the list shows how much esteem Big Tech giants command among other business leaders.

WMA 2024-Morgan Stanley

The 25th Fortune World’s Most Admired Companies list suggests that tech giants’ peers respect them as much as ever.

WMAC 2023-Morgan Stanley

The corporations on our annual list of the world’s largest companies delivered a record $41 trillion in aggregate revenues.

The 300 companies on this list are transforming industries from the inside out.

The Fortune 500, in its 69th year in 2023, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

F500-2023-061-Morgan-Stanley

The investment bank and financial services company saw modest revenue growth in 2022, but its profits slumped as dealmaking dried up in a rocky economy. 
<ul> 
 	<li>The bank reported $65.9 billion in revenue in 2022, up 8% from the year prior.</li> 
 	<li>Morgan Stanley’s profits dipped 27% to $11 billion as the firm’s investment banking arm struggled amid high inflation and a scarcity of M&amp;A deals.</li> 
 	<li>After some layoffs in 2022, the firm is reportedly planning more job cuts—3,000 or so—for 2023, with its banking and trading units enduring most of the reductions.</li> 
 	<li>James Gorman, the company’s CEO since 2010, announced in May that he would step down within the next 12 months. The company did not immediately name a successor.</li> 
</ul>

Just as it dominates our economy, Big Tech now dominates Fortune’s annual ranking of corporate reputation.

Aggregate sales hit $37.8 trillion last year—an increase of 19%, the highest annual growth rate in the list’s history.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 68th running of the list.

F500 2022-Morgan Stanley

Banks had a great 2021, and Morgan Stanley was no exception. The bank posted record net revenues (up 23%) and net income (up 37%) for the year, and its wealth management division added $1 trillion to client assets. Morgan Stanley also advised on several significant and big-ticket mergers this year, including Canada Pacific Railway’s $31 billion acquisition of Kansas City Southern to help create a Canada-U.S.-Mexico rail network. (The deal’s final approval was pending regulatory review as of May 2022.) The rate of mergers and acquisitions dropped significantly in the first few months of 2022, however, as geopolitical concerns and inflation left investors and corporate leaders feeling skittish.

After a year in which humanity leaned more heavily than ever on tech giants, see which companies topped Fortune's ranking of corporate reputation.

Total revenue for the world’s biggest companies fell 4.8% to $31.7 trillion this year—the first decline in half a decade.

G500-2021-204-Morgan Stanley

<span data-sheets-value="{&quot;1&quot;:2,&quot;2&quot;:&quot;What pandemic? Morgan Stanley appeared to weather the shutdowns seamlessly, even though CEO James Gorman was diagnosed with the coronavirus in March 2020. Boosted by surging capital markets (and without a consumer business to weigh it down during the lockdowns), revenue rose 16% to $48.2 million. The strong results seem validation of the bank’s decisions to spend billions of dollars doubling down on its brokerage and wealth management segments: In 2020, the bank acquired digital brokerage E*Trade for $13 billion and announced plans to acquire investment management firm Eaton Vance for $7 billion. The company’s upward trajectory hasn’t exactly been consistent, however. The bank lost about $911 million in the first quarter of 2021 owing to the collapse of family office Archegos Capital Management. While the firm still posted a record profit for the quarter, the incident is likely to present further challenges as regulators prod why financiers (including Morgan Stanley) had so much riding on a single client. \n&quot;}" data-sheets-userformat="{&quot;2&quot;:12673,&quot;3&quot;:{&quot;1&quot;:0},&quot;10&quot;:2,&quot;11&quot;:4,&quot;15&quot;:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;16&quot;:11}">What pandemic? Morgan Stanley appeared to weather the shutdowns seamlessly, even though CEO James Gorman was diagnosed with the coronavirus in March 2020. Boosted by surging capital markets (and without a consumer business to weigh it down during the lockdowns), revenue rose 16% to $48.2 million. The strong results seem validation of the bank’s decisions to spend billions of dollars doubling down on its brokerage and wealth management segments: In 2020, the bank acquired digital brokerage E*Trade for $13 billion and announced plans to acquire investment management firm Eaton Vance for $7 billion. The company’s upward trajectory hasn’t exactly been consistent, however. The bank lost about $911 million in the first quarter of 2021 owing to the collapse of family office Archegos Capital Management. While the firm still posted a record profit for the quarter, the incident is likely to present further challenges as regulators prod why financiers (including Morgan Stanley) had so much riding on a single client.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 67th running of the list.

F500-2021-61-Morgan Stanley

For an astounding 13th straight year, Apple claims the top spot in Fortune’s annual ranking of corporate reputation, based on a survey of almost 3,800 executives, directors, and analysts.

This year's Fortune Global 500 generated $33.3 trillion in revenues and $2.1 trillion in profits.

G500-2020-203-Morgan-Stanley

Since the 2008 financial crisis, Morgan Stanley has increasingly leaned on its wealth management business as a steadier revenue source than trading or investment banking. Morgan Stanley has doubled down on the strategy with success: Last year wealth and investment management grew to 51% of the company's revenue, compared to 26% in 2010. Now the bank is spending billions to capture a younger, more tech-savvy clientele. In February 2019, Morgan Stanley acquired Solium Capital, which helps manage stock compensation plans for the likes of Instacart, Stripe, and Shopify, for $900 million. In early 2020, the bank titan made an even larger play for the masses by acquiring discount brokerage E*Trade Financial for $13 billion—putting it head-to-head with the likes of Charles Schwab and Robinhood.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 66th running of the list.

F500-2020-061-Morgan-Stanley.

Since the 2008 financial crisis, Morgan Stanley has increasingly leaned on its wealth management business as a steadier revenue source, rather than on trading and investment banking. Morgan Stanley has doubled down on the strategy with success: Last year wealth and investment management grew to 51% of the company's revenue, compared to 26% in 2010. Now, the bank is spending billions to capture a younger, more tech-savvy clientele. In February 2019, Morgan Stanley acquired Solium Capital, which helps manage stock compensation plans for the likes of Instacart, Stripe, and Shopify, for $900 million. In early 2020, the bank titan made an even larger play for the masses by acquiring discount brokerage E*Trade Financial for $13 billion—putting it head-to-head with the likes of Charles Schwab and Robinhood.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2019 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune Global 500 generated $27.7 trillion in revenues and $1.5 trillion in profits.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 65th running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2018 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 64th running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2017 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 63rd running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2016 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune Global 500 generated $27.6 trillion in revenues and $1.5 trillion in profits.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 62nd running of the list.

The world's 500 largest companies generated $31.2 trillion in revenues and $1.7 trillion in profits in 2014. Together, this year's Fortune Global 500 employ 65 million people worldwide and are represented by 36 countries.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 61st running of the list. Wal-Mart claims the top spot again. See who made the list.

Global business is back. After limping through a worldwide financial crisis and economic slowdown, the 500 largest companies ranked by revenues shattered all sorts of performance records in 2013: They racked up combined revenues of $31.1 trillion, up 2.5% from 2012, and profits soared 27% to nearly $2 trillion. China’s 95 companies (up from 89 last year) posted $5.8 trillion in revenues. The U.S. has four fewer companies on the list than last year but remains (for now) the country leader, with 128 corporations on the list—including No. 1 Wal-Mart Stores—reporting $8.6 trillion in revenues. 

Wal-Mart stayed on top as its sales crept closer to half-a-trillion dollars. Apple moved into the top five. And UnitedHealth Group continued its steady climb. 

Sector

Industry

Current All-Star Rank

Previous All-Star Rank

Industry Rank

Previous Industry Rank

Overall Score

Innovation

People Management

Use of Corporate Assets

Social Responsibility

Quality of Management

Financial Soundness

Long-Term Investment Value

Quality of Products/Services

Global Competitiveness

Strongest Dimension

Years on list

Previous rank

State

Key Financials (last Fiscal Year)

Revenues ($M)

Profits ($M)

Assets ($M)

Total Stockholder Equity ($M)

Profit Ratios

Profit as % of Revenues

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholder Equity

Earnings Per Share (last Fiscal Year)

Earnings Per Share ($)

EPS % Change (from prior fiscal year)

EPS % Change (5 year annual rate)

EPS % Change (10 year annual rate)

Total Return

Total Return to Investors (last year)

Total Return to Investors (5 year, annualized)

Total Return to Investors (10 year, annualized)

Morgan Stanley is an investment bank and financial services firm. Its revenues are split between securities and wealth management; its securities business includes investment banking, underwriting, and advice on mergers and acquisitions. Its prominent subsidiaries include the self-directed investing platform E*Trade and the investment management firm Eaton Vance.

Q2 2026

Q1 2026

Q4 2025

Q3 2025

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Q4 2024

Morgan Stanley (MS): Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings

legacy

Morgan Stanley

morgan stanley

Good morning. Welcome to Morgan Stanley's First Quarter twenty twenty five Earnings Call. On behalf of Morgan Stanley, I will begin the call with the following information and disclaimers. This call is being recorded. During today's presentation, we will refer to our earnings release and financial supplement, copies of which are available at morganstanley.com.

Today's presentation may include forward looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially. Morgan Stanley does not undertake to update the forward looking statements in this discussion. Please refer to our notices regarding forward looking statements and non GAAP measures that appear in the earnings release. This presentation may not be duplicated or reproduced without our consent. I will now turn the call over to Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Ted Pick.

Good morning. Thank you for joining us. The firm delivered a very strong quarter with $17,700,000,000 in revenue, dollars 2.6 in EPS and a 23% return on tangible. Wealth added $94,000,000,000 of net new assets, bringing the firm total to $7,700,000,000,000 Equities had a record $4,000,000,000 plus quarter, which led to strong results across institutional securities. Morgan Stanley delivered returns while supporting clients, buying back stock opportunistically and building $2,000,000,000 of capital.

Over the last five quarters, we've grown our equity capital base by about 10%. With a CET1 ratio of 15.3%, our excess capital position and financial strength give us ongoing flexibility in support of clients and shareholders. It is important that we put up five clean quarters. Our focus on clients combined with discipline around capital, risk, headcount and investment have generated sequential earnings of $2.02 1 point 8 2 dollars 1 point 8 8 dollars 2 point 2 2 dollars and now $2.6 This was against a backdrop that was generally favorable, but one that hasn't yet seen the tailwind of the long awaited M and A and IPO capital market cycle. Delivering an average of 20% returns on tangible over the last five quarters is continued affirmation of our financial goals.

We've been talking for the last three years about the end of the end of history, which is to say the end of an extended period of political and economic alignment toward globalization. History now resumes and with that comes an adjustment period where the outlook is necessarily less predictable. The stock, bond and currency markets are exhibiting the kind of overnight and intraday volatility that reflect rapidly changing probability assessments of different policy outcomes. Economists are telling us the risk of recession has materially increased, but the consensus today is softer, not negative growth. Inflation, meanwhile, continues to swing between declining and sticky.

But here too, the forward path of prices along the supply chain to producers and consumers is unclear. The simple truth today is that we do not yet know where trade policy will settle, nor do we know what the actual transmission effects will be on the real economy. As the year progresses, markets will calibrate further clarity on trade policy against the tax and deregulatory pillars of the agenda as The U. S. Endeavors to rebalance the fiscal equation and assert the national interest.

Given this unpredictability, some clients are deferring strategic activity while others are proceeding. Importantly, core segments of our client universe are continuing to engage. Barring the worst case risk off scenario, trade and geopolitical uncertainty will be priced into the markets over time and the raising, managing and allocating capital, the lifeblood of our business, will continue as corporates and investors cannot and will not ignore their trade, energy and technology priorities. In volatile periods, windows to deploy and reallocate capital open and close and open again. It is in such moments that clients most value Morgan Stanley's global reach and depth, our insights and advice, our capital markets access and our execution capabilities.

The Morgan Stanley of today is in a very good place. It is worth noting that we just delivered a top line and bottom line record quarter. While we are rightly focused on near term uncertainties and disruptions in the markets, our approach is to prudently plan for the longer term horizon. Our strategy to raise, manage and allocate capital for clients is crisp, and it is clear. We have an experienced and stable management team and a deep bench of talent that is focused on that which we can control.

We have financial strength and durability. We have a culture of rigor, humility, and partnership across our integrated firm. With a demonstrated track record of execution and now five strong quarters in, I am confident that Morgan Stanley will navigate this moment of history's resuming with focus and intensity and that the firm will continue to scale ClientWallet and drive long term operating results. And with that, I'll turn it over to Sharon to discuss the quarter in more detail.

Thank you, and good morning. The firm produced record revenues of $17,700,000,000 and EPS of $2.6 with a strong ROTCE of 23%. The results demonstrate the power of advice and supporting clients as the intermediary of capital across products and geographies, particularly during periods of uncertainty. With a long standing global footprint, we are uniquely positioned to serve clients as they navigate global market events and quickly evolving macro dynamics. The first quarter efficiency ratio was 68%.

Strong revenues and a continued focus on creating capacity to invest in longer term initiatives contributed to results. Improved efficiency comes despite $144,000,000 of severance charges, which were related to performance management and the alignment of our business needs. Now to the businesses. Institutional Securities delivered a record quarter with revenues of $9,000,000,000, up 28% versus the prior year. The breadth of our capabilities and our geographic reach, particularly in our equity franchise and in Asia, drove exceptional performance.

Global activity among financial sponsors increased, supporting a steady recovery in investment banking from trough levels. Market catalysts such as shifting dynamics in AI, uncertainty around global monetary policy, and US trade debates created bouts of volatility during the quarter, leading to high levels of client activity and engagement. Against this backdrop, Morgan Stanley advised and supported clients as they rebalanced risk consistent with our strengths and our business model. Investment banking revenues were $1,600,000,000 for the quarter. Strength in fixed income underwriting offset results in equity underwriting.

Advisory revenues of $563,000,000 reflected higher completed deals across regions. Activity during this period was supported by a pickup in financial sponsor engagement and growth in mid sized deal announcements. Equity underwriting revenues were $319,000,000 Equity markets were largely open, but activity was muted as issuers and investors evaluated the evolving landscape, particularly in The Americas. Fixed income underwriting delivered revenues of $677,000,000. The result was very strong with noninvestment grade loan issuance driving outperformance.

Strong investor demand and tight credit spreads supported active issuance, providing opportunities for our business to capture share during the quarter. With tariff announcements and subsequent market volatility excuse me, while tariff announcements and subsequent market volatility has disrupted near term deal activity, our pipelines have not meaningfully changed since the beginning of the year and remain robust. Therefore, while the timing of the deal execution remains sensitive to market conditions, there remains demand for strategic advice and capital raising. Turning to equity. Revenues were robust, increasing 45% from the prior year to a record $4,100,000,000 The quarter reflects strength across our client franchise, a broad and deep global footprint, prudent risk management, and returns on our multiyear investments across products contributed to results.

Globally, we helped clients remain agile amidst shifting market themes. Prime Brokerage continued to report strong results. Clients remain engaged and invested. Our cash business benefited from volumes increasing across regions. Derivative revenues were meaningfully up versus the prior year.

The result reflects higher client activity amid a more volatile trading environment. Fixed income revenues were $2,600,000,000 improving versus the prior year. An increase in flow trading activity offset fewer structured opportunities. Macro revenues increased versus the prior year. The business navigated higher market volatility well, particularly in foreign exchange, where client activity increased across products relative to last year.

Micro revenue declined slightly as tighter credit spreads limited secondary market opportunities versus the comparative period. This was partially offset by higher loan balances and an increase in securitization activity. Other revenues increased to $692,000,000 primarily driven by realized gains on the sale of corporate loans held for sale. Turning to ISG lending and provisions. In the quarter, ISG provisions were $91,000,000 This reflected portfolio growth alongside a more cautious outlook in response to the volatile macro backdrop in the first quarter.

Net charge offs were approximately $23,000,000 primarily related to commercial real estate loans in the office sector, which were largely already provisioned for. Turning to Wealth. The business delivered very strong results in the quarter across metrics. Revenues of $7,300,000,000 reported margin of 27%, ninety four billion dollars in net new assets, and consistently strong fee based flows of $30,000,000,000 Retail clients remain engaged. Strong transactional activity, increased unsolicited trading, and ongoing migration into fee based accounts demonstrate client participation and the demand for advice amid heightened volatility.

Client asset levels across the franchise remained strong at $6,000,000,000,000 of assets. Fee based assets were largely unchanged compared to the end of the year at $2,300,000,000,000, highlighting the diversified nature of the adviser led fee based account flows. Pretax profits was $2,000,000,000, and the reported PBT margin was 26.6. The margin was negatively impacted by 174 basis points related to DCP and severance related costs. Net new assets for the quarter were strong at $94,000,000,000 representing a 6% annualized growth rate of beginning period assets.

The result was supported by broad based strength across channels, inclusive of elevated flows related to advisor led clients, stock plan vesting events, positive recruiting trends, and self directed clients. Asset management revenues were $4,400,000,000 up 15% year over year, reflecting higher market levels and the cumulative impact of positive fee based flows. Fee based flows remained strong at $30,000,000,000 2 dynamics continue to play through our results. First, fee based flows in the quarter were again supported by assets migrating from advisor led brokerage accounts to fee based accounts. Second, assets migrating to the adviser led channel that originated from the workplace channel as these relationships grow with an incremental $20,000,000,000 this quarter, adding to the roughly $300,000,000,000 accumulated from Workplace since we expanded our channel in 2020.

Transactional revenues were $873,000,000 and excluding the impact of DCP were up 13% versus the prior year. The first quarter's results were supported by higher levels of client activity, evidenced by strong daily average trades that have continued to rise despite recent uncertainty. Bank lending balances increased $3,000,000,000 quarter over quarter to $163,000,000,000 driven by balanced demand across products. During the quarter, we saw a pickup in securities based lending balances likely to satisfy upcoming tax obligations. Total deposits of $375,000,000,000 were up quarter over quarter as demand for our savings offering was partially offset by the modest decline in sweep balances.

Within sweeps, we saw clients consistently deploy cash into markets during each month of the first quarter. Overall deposit movements in the quarter were generally in line with seasonality and our expectations. Net interest income was up modestly quarter over quarter to $1,900,000,000 Looking ahead to the second quarter, we expect a seasonal decline in sweeps related to tax payments, which would result in a modest decline in NII. However, over the course of the recent two weeks, we have seen a notable increase in sweep balances, exceeding our internal forecasts. While this is likely associated with recent market uncertainty, it could have offsetting impacts to the NII in the second quarter should this continue.

For the second quarter, deposit mix will remain the key driver of NII. Our wealth franchise sets the industry standard, where both clients and advisers recognize the power of our platform. Clients continue to entrust us with more of their assets, reinforcing the value they place on advice. Advisor recruitment remains strong, reflecting our reputation as an exceptional place where financial advisers can grow their businesses. Looking towards the year ahead, uncertainty has increased the value of advice and our diversified capabilities.

We are confident that our business will deliver durable results throughout various market environments. Moving to investment management. Reported revenues were $1,600,000,000 increasing 16% versus the prior year. Results reflected higher asset management and related fees driven by higher average AUM. Total AUM ended at $1,600,000,000,000 Long term net inflows were $5,400,000,000 in the quarter.

The inflows were driven primarily by Parametric and fixed income and were supported by our efforts to expand distribution of these products. Within alternatives and solutions, Parametric continues to grow as demand for customized direct indexing and tax advantaged solutions remains a key source of retail client engagement. Liquidity and overlay services had outflows of $19,000,000,000. These outflows were consistent with seasonal trends, but were more moderate than we had previously expected. Performance based income and other revenues were $151,000,000 supported by gains in several infrastructure investments.

Turning to the balance sheet. Total spot assets were $1,300,000,000,000. During the period, we accreted $1,900,000,000 of common equity Tier one capital and continued to deliver to our commitment to return capital to our shareholders, buying back $1,000,000,000 of common stock during the quarter. Standardized RWAs increased quarter over quarter consistent with seasonal trends and active support of our clients. We ended the quarter with a standardized CET1 ratio of 15.3%, underscoring our strong capital position.

Our first quarter tax rate was 21%. The lower rate was supported by share based award conversions, which largely take place in the first quarter. This quarter's results underscore the strong and consistent performance we strive to deliver in active markets. As a trusted adviser to our broad global client base, we continue to benefit from the strength of our integrated firm. Our client driven model, combined with strong capital and liquidity, positions us to support clients as they navigate the uncertain landscape.

And with that, I will open the line up to questions.

We are now ready to take in questions. If your question has been answered or you wish to remove yourself from the queue, please press star and the number two on your touch tone telephone. You're allowed to ask one question and one follow-up, and then we'll move to the next person in the queue. Please stand by while we compile the Q and A roster. We'll take our first question from Steven Chubak with Wolfe Research.

Hi. Good morning, and thanks for taking my questions.

Good morning. So, Ted, I I wanted to start off with one on the equities trading outlook. Just given your experience overseeing the business, the recent strength has been pretty extraordinary, and the updates from you and your peers suggest the trading has actually been pretty orderly amid the recent volatility. I was hoping you could just speak to the factors that might support continued durability of the recent strength and some of the variables you're monitoring that could potentially derail some of the recent momentum as well?

Steve, love your question. Great quarter. Client activity across the nine boxes, all three products, all three regions, everything clicked. We've made the investments in clients, in technology, across high touch and electronic cash, across prime brokerage and in both the flow and derivative products and across each major region. Those are the nine boxes.

The cash business, as you know, the prime brokerage business and the derivatives business in each of the three regions, and they all clicked. I feel really good about the business and its leadership under Alan Thomas and Gulcoloroy. They've done a hell of a job. It is fundamentally activity based. The bear case would be weaker economy, weaker sentiment, I.

The animal spirits going to hibernation. That would be constant with lower prices, negative manager performance, and that brings lower transaction levels, lower leverage levels, lower new issue activity. But that's not where we are. Markets are off, but clients remain much engaged, high volumes in every region. We have big market share in Asia, as you know, high two way market views as we're living through over the last number of days, and new issue market that may pause but is still on pipeline.

So the upshot is that $4,000,000,000 is a very big number, but the run rate is has been higher than what we'd seen a couple of years ago. And it makes sense as we continue to consolidate share. We're clearly continuing to take share with the right technology, the right mix of client business, the right focus on returns around the world. So it's a winner. And insofar as we don't go risk off, it'll continue to be a winner.

No. Thanks for that perspective, Ted. And maybe for my follow-up for Sharon, just on the NNA outlook. So the flows were certainly more durable than we and others had anticipated. The market deterioration admittedly was a bit more back end loaded, and it has accelerated into April.

So I was hoping you could speak to the durability of the NNA strength just given some of the negative marks we've seen in both fixed income and equities. And you noted cash has been much more resilient in April. I was hoping you could also speak to what you're seeing across lending and margin, particularly margin, which is more, equity or beta sensitive.

Sure. So let me start first by the NNA because I think the story there is actually really encouraging when you look under the hood. As you know, we have three channels. We have workplace, we have self directed, and we have adviser led. Last year, if you compare it a year ago, and I know, you know, it was a strong first quarter last year, but we talked about individualized flows in the first quarter of last year.

We didn't discuss that here because it was a much more broad based. We had a year over year growth in each of those three segments. So stock plan was an increase. On the self directed side, we have been investing, and you can see it even in our expense numbers, on our marketing and our investment in our self directed platform. There has been an increase in the assets that we're seeing in that platform, which is encouraging, on the back of those investments.

And on the adviser led side, it's multiple clients and multiple different sections that you're actually seeing those flows come in, and we're also seeing flows from the recruiting side. So all of that in my mind is quite encouraging that we're seeing the benefits of the investments that we've been making into that platform over multiple years, including even the most recent last year. As it relates specifically to the cash and the stocks that you've mentioned in terms of the SBLs, I was encouraged by the SBL lending lines that we saw and the growth over the course of the first quarter. If you look back over the course of the last two years or so, there's been more muted growth, especially going into taxes. Historically, we had seen individuals using their BDP specifically for paying those taxes or money market cash.

The fact that we've seen an increase in SBL, which I mentioned in my prepared remarks ahead of tax season, I think is encouraging, that we have reached, at least from a transactional lever, what could be an equilibrium. And in periods of, say, a risk off, etcetera, you might actually begin to see increases in those balances, which I noticed that we had seen higher than expected levels over the course of these last two weeks.

We'll move to our next question from Christian Bolu with Autonomous Research.

Oops. Sorry about that. I was on mute. Can you hear me okay now?

We we were we weren't we weren't at all offended.

We're just wondering how big the question's gonna be, man.

Yeah. I I was talking to myself for a while there. Sorry. Just just

to follow-up on I I know. I I know what that's like.

So to follow-up on Steven's question around maybe more broadly on trading, just exceptional results here. Clearly, the market's very volatile, and that volatility has stepped up in April. So maybe talk about how you're managing risk. And then are you taking down exposures, or are you still playing offense? And then any any sort of color on prime brokerage balances in in in April and what you're seeing from hedge fund clients?

Well, broadly, the the first quarter flows into the second quarter. There is a lot of client interaction, and the animal spirits are still there insofar as folks are trying to not get caught offside. So there's natural volatility that we're seeing, as I mentioned in the opening remarks, in every space and within equity. So the basic market making function, which is the bread and butter of the cash business, both voice and electronic, continues to be very strong. You're speaking to the prime brokerage business.

There, we continue to be a leader. And sure, if clients begin to go negative or they need to delever, well, by definition, lower balances are the result which results over time in lower P and L. But much of the client base, Christian, you know, most folks are closer to the zero barrier than they are a number that is well off of that. So they have a lot to play for. And given the swings and given the intellectual capital that exists with the asset management community, they're going to look to continue to engage.

There's plenty of stock dispersion that manifests itself in the derivatives markets, as you know. Lots of ways to play across asset macro. So that brings together our equities and fixed income folks to put together structured product. So there's lots of reason to think that the equities business and the markets business generally will continue to be active. The question over time will be at what point does the uncertainty result in a knockout of the new issue business and volumes will slow on the back of just a continued sense of uncertainty.

And you see then gap year markets and lower volumes, but we're not seeing that. There is plenty of market making going on. The first quarter, of course, is typically a seasonal winner across the street because clients need to initially allocate, but they continue to allocate. So I'm feeling good about that broadly. And I think our own experience has been one where things have been orderly.

We've been working with clients nonstop. And for all of the concerns about what could come down the road in the real economy, the market making and the ability to transact to clients as they up and down their leverage levels has been very orderly. So engagement is key here, and engagement continues.

Very helpful. Maybe a question on Asia, and kudos to to the team for, you know, doing a good job on building out strength across regions, particularly in Asia. And I'm guessing a lot of that is is Japan and the MUFG partnership. But bigger picture, if if we are deglobalizing and there is a decoupling of US from Asia broadly, how do you think about the prospects of your international business?

Bullish. The the the power of a global business is to I hate the cliche sort of HBR cliche here, but think global, act local. And I think that has application in our Asia business broadly across the investment management and wealth high net worth wealth businesses, which have had a great run here in Hong Kong. But then importantly, the institutional securities business, which is actually about 15% of our firm revenues this past quarter and was up 35% year over year. So real strength.

We have something special, Christian, with our friends and partners in Tokyo. We will have our next board meeting in Tokyo, in fact, a business summit with the leadership in Japan. So we intend on continuing to expand that extraordinary partnership with MUFG. That is a multi decade play, we hope, both in the institutional context and in the wealth context. We have a significant business in India.

That is a place where we have the better part of 12,000 people. We will continue to build our capability both as an infrastructure matter, but also as a securities matter. And then Greater China, we have 2,500 people out of Hong Kong, out of the 17,500 people that we have in Asia. So taking a step back, we have 80,000 people at the firm. 17,500 of them are in Asia.

So this is existential to what we do, and 2,500 of those people are in Hong Kong. We're not a big corporate lender onshore in China, but we interact via Hong Kong actively, And we continue to be a leader, both in the investment banking business and in the markets business in recent quarters, clearly, in equities, where clients want to get access to the Mainland and to that second largest economy and stock market and liquidity center in the world, and we continue to be a point of market access and interaction. We pay attention to it, Christian, as you can imagine, actively, but day and night because things constantly move around. But we're feeling really good about our continued engagement with the client base, locally based, but also on a global basis. And I think when we look back at this period ten, fifteen years from now when you and I are having this chat, we will we will see a Morgan Stanley that indeed has a significant international business.

I could spend five minutes talking about our business in Europe. I will I will simply say that we've continued to invest both in The UK and on the continent. We are a determined player to be part of the next global order, both in the wealth and investment management business, but really in the global institutional securities business. As you know, Christian, one of the realities of financial repression was that the cost of running a global investment bank was pretty tough to make the return on capital not. Very tough.

So to have gotten here now with the kind of bankers and markets folks and infrastructure through all of the panoply of regulation throughout Europe and internationally to get to this point now where we can slowly take share, to durably take share. You saw that we put into the firm wide goals to durably increase share across the investment bank. That is not a quarter or even year phenomenon. That is a multiyear phenomenon where we think that there will be, of course, national champions, but there will be several global winners that are able to transact in the businesses where we do real well, which is trusted adviser on M and A trades, on underwritings, and then importantly, market making, and then flow through to net worth where it exists, principally in The U. S.

So I am really quite bullish on our international business, and we will navigate the next number of months and quarters with care. But the determination as a long term matter is not only undaunted, but we will push forward.

We'll move to our next question from Ebrahim Poonawala with Bank of America.

guess maybe, Ted, so maybe it's just me, but you sound fairly constructive given what we've come through over the last month, your comments on both on the trading side and how clients have behaved and what we've seen in Wealth. It doesn't seem to be the case that we've seen a marked deterioration in the last week or the last couple of weeks relative to super strength earlier in the quarter. Is is is is that a fair assessment? I don't wanna put words in your mouth, but it goes to the fact that if if that's the case, the business is a lot more resilient than investors probably give credit for. So just wanna make sure we are thinking about it in the right way.

You mentioned things about, like, if folks going to hibernation, etcetera. I'm surprised that they haven't already. So just wanna make sure, so far, given all what we've seen in the market, you've not really felt any negative adverse impacts or trading over on the wealth side.

Well, the fundamentally, the the banking pipeline hasn't changed.

Some clients some clients are are are naturally going to pause. They've hit the pause button, and others are a go. And there is, as you know, you spend time looking at sponsoring corporate activity.

There are financial sponsors buying and selling as we speak. Honeywell, Warburg Pincus, Bayer, Clear Lake, Dun and Bradstreet. So there are sponsors buying and selling assets. So they will continue to play as will corporates. It's just going to have to be against the reality of this uncertainty.

If the uncertainty can be navigated and priced into the market, there is progress on these complicated issues, then folks, I imagine, will respond to that and factor it in as part of their execution risk formula. Now clearly, if we go risk off, which is to say things really become so unpredictable that you don't know where a stock price is going to be within 10% or 20%, or you don't know where an FX cross is going to be within five percent or 10% and so on with interest rates. Well, I mean, by definition then, activity will stop. I mean, that is just the definition of risk off, as you know. But insofar as there is still, we are early here.

And we're talking about the re architecting of industrial policy in the context of America's place in the world and where it wants to be decades from now. That is weighty stuff. But it may well be that that takes some time for some of the bilateral negotiations. But in other contexts, actually, some deals are put on the table, in which case people are going to want to move forward. Because it is our view that the underwriting and m and a pipeline, street wide, by the way, it's not a Morgan Stanley phenomenon.

This is the leadership of that product area is ready to go. And if windows open, whether those windows are open over a weekend or for a week or in fact for quarters, or there's a sense that, in fact, there's relief because we get through this period and we get towards the next two pillars, tax and dereg, I can see clients continuing to move, and we will continue to prosecute business. So that's the long answer. The short answer is in the opening of the quarter, we have not seen a slowdown. Is it it bumpier for some clients?

Of course, it is, and we have to see how they respond to that over the the course of the weeks and months to come. But we are we are still, we'll call it cautiously optimistic that we won't go into recession, and we will just keep going.

That's helpful color. Thank you. And maybe, Sharon, for you, there's obviously a lot of discussion around changes to the SLR ratio. Just remind us how impactful could that be for how you manage the balance sheet and just how you manage the business. Is it is it is it a needle mover stand alone, or how how do you think about that?

Yeah. So I think that it's hard to I wouldn't take SLR only in isolation. I will answer your question directly first, but I will give you a a little bit of more holistic answer, which is SLR has been over various quarters, our binding constraint. And so certainly, if there's SLR reform, then we will move into a CET one constraint world, and that provides us with additional opportunities as you think about capital deployment. That being said, it depends on what SLR reform you see.

Right? Whether or not it's simply just to allow certain certain things like treasuries into the denominator, how you think about that, or whether there's a more wholesale understanding that SLR should not be it should certainly be just a backstop and not a binding constraint for an institution. What we feel is probably more important than SLR specifically is just to look at the entire capital regime. So when you think about the interplay between GSIB, between SLR, and between the various CET one metrics, that is the type of reform one should look at because they actually don't play necessarily that well together, given that there have been incremental changes simply to one metric versus the other. So from our perspective, one should be looking at everything holistically.

But yes, obviously, we do welcome regulatory reform, and we welcome reform to the SLR ratio.

SLR becomes part of the mechanism potentially for some of the relief here broadly. It may or may not happen. But to Sharon's point, I think what we are interested in here and as an industry is SLR reform in the context of the panoply of regulation that we have sort of endured, whether it's GSIB or CCAR LCR, Basel III Endgame, the entire panoply of acronyms, the the the SLR reform might be part of the cocktail in the short term, but, really, we would look for reform broadly. And we're we're we're much prepared for that. And, again, Ebrahim, just to sort of put an emphasis on this, we can't make a call on where the markets are going to be a week from now.

I mean, that would be absurd for us to know that. So in a sense, there is increased uncertainty. So any strategic transaction is by definition gonna get a harder look. What what I'm what I'm trying to underscore here, though, is that that largely what we're seeing is some folks still going, but the others pausing. They're not deleting.

They're pausing. So, yes, that could result in some of the IPO stack moving out a quarter or two. It could be that some m and a activity moves out a stack or two. But this is not a question of people rethinking their priorities around technology, energy, competitive dynamics within their industry. So that is why we continue to push forward on this theme that we are going to be in an investment banking cycle.

And the fact that the Markets business continues to be as active as it is, is a pretty good balance against that within ISG.

We'll take our next question from Dan Fannon with Jefferies.

Good morning. Question on just the adviser business. In the market backdrop like this with the last few weeks in terms of volatility, what does that mean for recruitment and retention trends? And, also, does that change the appetite for fee based flows as you think about, you know, going forward and and your goals around increasing that metric?

people are coming toward the platform. Jetson and Vince Lumia's lights are blinking as in their phone lights nonstop. Folks want to come on to this platform. And that is in part because the funnel works. We're investing in E*TRADE.

The self directed channel is very busy. Sharon at length has talked about as have I, the workplace product where we added another $20,000,000,000 You see the progress in fee based flows. But ultimately, when you get to the top of the funnel, it is about the financial adviser. And the financial adviser is seeing the integrated firm for what it is, which is we can offer unique access to intellectual capital, world class technology, compensation that is viewed to be fair and motivating, and the entire thing works. And so what's happening is we are selective about it, but it is fair to say that Jed and Vince are getting a lot of inbound inquiry, and we would expect that to to continue.

Great. And and then just as a follow-up, sticking with wealth, you know, the opportunity for alternatives in the wealth channel is clearly a focus for the the large alternative managers. Can you talk about your own proprietary alternative products that you might be able to sell within this channel, or is that something you could think about inorganically wanting to get bigger in in terms of your own proprietary products?

Sure. So I'd note for the wealth management platform, we have over $200,000,000,000 of private alternatives. It's about if you take that into perspective in terms of what the qualified assets are, we have about 5% of the qualified assets in our system are in those private alternatives. Now that compares to your point where our GIC, where our we have, you know, our global investment committee, the recommendation is closer to 15% for qualified investors. So there certainly is opportunity there.

We're working on products, from our perspective as well as, obviously, others are doing it, but we are looking also at places to help fill these gaps and to help you provide a more democratized offering. So it's certainly a focus. It's something that you'll see come through, and we think that there's great opportunity there for us and more broadly just for those alternatives across the platform to go to our retail client base.

We'll take our next question from Glenn Schorr with Evercore.

Good morning. So so we've all applauded all the great trading, which which is actually awesome. I'm I'm very curious. You guys are going through the pretty draconian stress test, the stress test will always spit out pretty bad answers for for what any big investment bank does on the trading side. You're doing literally the opposite of that right now.

So I'm curious when when you look at the composition of those tests and then you look at the reality of of how you perform, and I know it's not like every day and you can't predict the future, but, like, I'm curious on what's different about the setup, how you might suggest tweaking it. Because I know every June when we go through the results, they're way different than reality.

So in terms of the underlying stress test, you're obviously going to pick different portions of the what that environment would be. What we do versus what the Fed does for our own individual stress test will be different. We will test ourselves on where we think that we would have the most vulnerabilities. I think that the challenges that when you look at the underlying test is really the the uncertainty and the build on build of both previous years. And the fact that you're you if you think about the way and we've said this publicly.

Morgan Stanley (MS) Q1 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Company Participants