With a combined revenue of $21 trillion and $2.1 trillion in profits, the 2026 Fortune 500 is the definitive list of America's largest companies.

Fortune 500

See which workplaces made this year's list.

Employees say:"The growth opportunities are fantastic. The reinvestment into the people and needs of the company are felt company wide. The culture is super strong. We all pull in the same direction and that is incredibly unique in my experience. Leadership is honest and forthcoming."

Best Small and Medium Workplaces for Parents

The companies on this annual list make a conscious effort to be supportive, inclusive workplaces.

Employees say:"I have always felt valued and seen at this company. I have a support system in my teammates and my manager. I can show up exactly as I am and feel I belong. I am able to balance my personal life and work life easily due to the flexible approach the company has. We are seen as people first, then employees. I also appreciate how quickly the company adapts to changes and employee needs (i.e. working remotely, increased parental leave, mental health benefits) and responds to employee feedback."

Best Small and Medium Workplaces for Women

Almost $20 trillion in revenue—and a record-breaking $1.87 trillion in profits. Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive list of the biggest companies in America.

The 300 companies on this year’s list brought in over $12.6 trillion in revenue for the latest 12 months, with the median revenue figure at $22 billion.

America's Most Innovative Companies

Leaders in all industries rely more than ever on Big Tech—and appreciate the giants that deliver, at scale, without drama.

World's Most Admired Companies

Industries included in the sector are banks, insurance, and real estate companies.

Fortune Sector Leaders: Financials

The Fortune 500, in its 70th year in 2024, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

The 26th edition of the list shows how much esteem Big Tech giants command among other business leaders.

The 25th Fortune World’s Most Admired Companies list suggests that tech giants’ peers respect them as much as ever.

The Fortune 500, in its 69th year in 2023, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 68th running of the list.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 67th running of the list.

F500-2021-175-Marsh & McLennan

The global professional services firm, which in April rebranded to Marsh McLennan, has businesses in insurance brokerage, risk management, reinsurance services, talent management, investment advisory, and management consulting.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 66th running of the list.

F500-2020-195-Marsh-and-Mclennan

This professional services giant oversees businesses including risk management companies Marsh and Guy Carpenter and consulting firms Mercer and Oliver Wyman Group.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 65th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 64th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 63rd running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 62nd running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 61st running of the list. Wal-Mart claims the top spot again. See who made the list.

Wal-Mart stayed on top as its sales crept closer to half-a-trillion dollars. Apple moved into the top five. And UnitedHealth Group continued its steady climb. 

Fortune Global 500

Sector

Industry

Current All-Star Rank

Previous All-Star Rank

Industry Rank

Previous Industry Rank

Overall Score

Innovation

People Management

Use of Corporate Assets

Social Responsibility

Quality of Management

Financial Soundness

Long-Term Investment Value

Quality of Products/Services

Global Competitiveness

Culture rank

Process rank

Product rank

Years on list

Previous rank

Best Workplaces For Women

Industry Vertical

Founded

# Work Sites

Best Workplaces For Parents

Sites

Key Financials (last Fiscal Year)

Revenues ($M)

Profits ($M)

Assets ($M)

Total Stockholder Equity ($M)

Profit Ratios

Profit as % of Revenues

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholder Equity

Earnings Per Share (last Fiscal Year)

Earnings Per Share ($)

EPS % Change (from prior fiscal year)

EPS % Change (5 year annual rate)

EPS % Change (10 year annual rate)

Total Return

Total Return to Investors (last year)

Total Return to Investors (5 year, annualized)

Total Return to Investors (10 year, annualized)

Marsh &amp; McLennan is a professional services company that provides advisory and insurance solutions to clients in the areas of risk, strategy, and people. Founded in 1871, Marsh &amp; McLennan operates across four major businesses—Marsh, Guy Carpenter, Mercer, and Oliver Wyman—serving clients in more than 130 countries.

Q3 2026

Q2 2026

Q1 2026

Q4 2025

Q3 2025

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Q4 2024

Marsh & McLennan (MRSH): Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings

legacy

Marsh & McLennan

marsh & mclennan

Hello, and welcome to Marsh's Earnings Conference Call. Today's call is being recorded. Third quarter 2026 financial results and supplemental information were issued earlier this morning. They are available on the company's website at marsh.com. Please note that remarks made today may include forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, and a variety of factors may cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by such statements. For a more detailed discussion of those factors, please refer to our earnings release to this quarter and to our most recent SEC filings, including our most recent Form 10-K, all of which are available on the Marsh website.

During the call today, we may also discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures. For a reconciliation of these measures to the most closely comparable GAAP measures, please refer to the schedule in today's earnings release. If you have a question, please press star one one on your touch-tone phone. If you wish to be removed from the queue, please press star one one again. If you are using a speakerphone, you may need to pick up the handset before pressing the numbers. Once again, if you have a question, please press star one one on your touch-tone phone.

I'll now turn this over to John Doyle, President and CEO of Marsh.

Good morning, and thank you for joining us to discuss our third quarter results. I'm John Doyle, President and CEO of Marsh. On the call with me is Mark McGivney, our COO and CFO, and our business CEOs, Nick Studer from Risk, Dean Klisura, Reinsurance, Pat Tomlinson of People and Investments, and Ted Moynihan from Management Consulting. Also with us is Jay Gelb, Head of Investor Relations. Let me start by commenting on the conditions confronting businesses today. We're clearly in a period of change and uncertainty in the world. This change is structural, not cyclical, and it's happening at pace and all at once. Wars, geoeconomics, extreme weather, and AI advances are challenging long-established norms. Businesses require a new playbook, better insights and perspectives, and the flexibility to adapt as never before.

At the same time, access to information and technology, as well as greater focus on resilience, offers businesses great opportunity. It's why Marsh and Bloomberg announced the Competitive Resilience Coalition. As knowledge partner for the Bloomberg New Economy, Marsh will co-chair the coalition and bring together business and government leaders to strengthen resilience and help organizations in an increasingly complex environment. Marsh's vision and capabilities as a professional services firm across risk, strategy, people, and investments have us well-positioned to help clients be more resilient and to thrive in this moment. When it comes to AI, we believe it will be good for our country and the global economy. However, we need to deploy the technology responsibly to avoid potentially severe, systemic, or irreversible risks.

We are particularly concerned about the potential for heightened cyber exposure from AI, and we are working with governments, insurance companies, and businesses to create awareness and resilience to this risk. Responsible AI implementation begins with the developers, but businesses and governments have a role to play in ensuring safeguards are in place. Marsh will be active in helping clients manage the risks and capture the opportunities from AI. Turning to results, Marsh had a strong quarter, reflecting our market-leading positions, the value we deliver to clients, and the commitment of our colleagues around the world. In our consulting segment, growth was strong in People and Investments and Management Consulting. In RIS, growth accelerated in our risk business, while reinsurance faced continued market headwinds but executed well. Overall, revenue grew 8% in the quarter. Underlying revenue growth was 5%, adjusted operating income grew 6%, and adjusted EPS grew 10%.

We repurchased $500 million of stock in the quarter, bringing us to $2 billion year to date. We also made meaningful progress executing our Thrive program and successfully completed our brand transition. When we launched Thrive a year ago, we targeted $400 million in savings. We are now seeing greater opportunities coming from Business and Client Services, or BCS, and advances in technology. As a result, we are increasing our Thrive savings target to $600 million. The expanded savings will create additional capacity to invest in sales, new capabilities, our brand, and technology. Let me touch on some of the progress from our reinvestments. Thrive has enabled us to invest in sales capacity at a higher rate this quarter and year to date, and we are hiring producers and consultants in areas where we see the greatest opportunity for growth.

Our colleague value proposition is strong, and we remain the destination for top talent in our business. I have been pleased with the strong positive reaction from colleagues and clients to our new brand strategy, the efficiencies we have captured from it, and our progress marketing Marsh to prospective clients. As a result of very favorable market research, we accelerated the transition of Guy Carpenter and Mercer to Marsh several months ahead of schedule. We believe we can be the most impactful professional services firm in the world, and we are investing in our new brand to reflect that ambition. Since its introduction last year, BCS has fundamentally changed how we work.

An important part of the team's mission is to build shared services for greater efficiency, including in areas such as client onboarding, data ingestion, commercial enablement, and operational excellence. BCS is also re-engineering our processes and moving work to our capability centers, which is generating additional savings. Overall, our execution of Thrive has been excellent to date, and we are excited about the investments in growth it is enabling.

Turning to AI in our business, we are not thinking about it as something that will be a factor in our business. It already is a factor in our business. It is enhancing our client relationships, how we manage operations, and how colleagues work every day. We are focused currently on several areas where AI is driving growth, including building AI-enabled products, consulting on AI transformation, serving the digital infrastructure ecosystem, and adding to capabilities and productivity for our producers and consultants. We have already deployed several AI-enabled products for clients that deliver valuable insights. These solutions tap into our large and expanding proprietary data sets in risk, health, and talent. Marsh Risk Companion is a good example. This AI-enabled analytics suite provides actionable insights for client risk programs.

We can more easily model and optimize client risk scenarios with the new platform. This is leading to faster, more informed decision-making and reduced administrative burden for the client's risk management team. We are also advising clients on AI transformation. For example, Oliver Wyman's fastest-growing practice, Quotient, is working with private equity firms to serve their portfolio companies. They are engaging us on everything from agentic commerce and commercial effectiveness to cost reduction and technology transformation. Digital infrastructure continues to be a growth driver for Marsh. More and more clients across broad sectors of the economy are asking for our help in risk, capital advisory, credit, and consulting in the wake of extensive growth in digital infrastructure. We are also working to bring the insurance capacity needed to support digital infrastructure.

Marsh recently launched the Stratus Exchange, which offers access up to $10 billion in property coverage for the ongoing operations of digital facilities. Stratus is a natural follow-up to Nimbus, our $2.7 billion insurance facility for construction risks. We are also focused on growth from greater colleague productivity. Notably, Broker WorkBench, launched in Q3 for our U.K. wholesale business. It uses our data and analytics to place a client's risks faster, matching risk and capital more efficiently. In fact, 93% of our wholesale trading in London is now digital, and the time to process placements has reduced from two to four weeks to a couple of hours with WorkBench. Although it is early, and it is early, AI is making us better now in delivering new perspectives and insights more efficiently and with greater impact for our clients.

Now, turning to market conditions. According to the Marsh Global Insurance Market Index, primary commercial insurance rates decreased 5% in Q3. This follows a 6% decline in the second quarter. As a reminder, our index skews to large accounts. Rates in the U.S. decreased 1%. Canada, Europe, and Asia declined mid-single digits. The U.K., Latin America decreased in the high single digits, and the Pacific region had double-digit decreases. Global property rates decreased 10%. Global financial and professional liability rates were down 3%, while cyber decreased 4%. Global casualty rates increased 1%, with U.S. excess casualty up 13%, reflecting inflationary pressure and loss costs. Workers' compensation decreased 5%. In reinsurance, market conditions led by short tail lines remain soft, driven by abundant capacity from both traditional reinsurers and alternative capital.

Property cat reinsurance losses have been relatively benign this year, and capital is increasing, adding to a competitive market environment. We expect these conditions to persist through the January 1 renewal cycle. In casualty reinsurance, capacity is generally adequate. Reinsurers are focused on loss development, and they are differentiating terms based on claims experience, exposure data, and portfolio quality. Our clients continue to explore alternative options to complement traditional strategies, including greater use of third-party capital solutions such as sidecar vehicles for their liability portfolios. Market conditions remain supportive of our insurance and reinsurance clients, even as the cost of risk continues to rise. We are committed to helping clients optimize their risk financing and strengthen resilience in an uncertain environment.

Now to our third quarter financial performance, which Mark will cover in more detail. Consolidated revenue increased 8% to $6.9 billion, or an increase of 5% on an underlying basis, with 3% growth in RIS and 8% in consulting. Risk was up 5%. Reinsurance declined 6%, People and Investments increased 5%, and Management Consulting grew 14%. Adjusted operating income grew 6%, and adjusted EPS was $2.03, up 10% year-over-year. Looking ahead, we continue to expect underlying revenue growth in 2026, similar to last year.

We also anticipate another year of margin expansion and solid adjusted EPS growth. Our outlook is based on current market conditions, but the economic and geopolitical environment could change materially from our assumptions. This is an exciting time for us. We have a new Marsh brand and a business and client services team optimizing how we work. We have longstanding trusted client relationships and the advantage of large proprietary data sets. We are upsizing the Thrive program to drive greater efficiency and investment, and we see new possibilities from AI to better serve clients who strive to manage risk and capitalize on the opportunity of this moment.

With that, I will turn the discussion to Mark for a more detailed review of our results. Mark?

Thank you, John. Good morning. We had a strong third quarter that showed continued momentum in underlying revenue growth and double-digit EPS growth, reflecting our strong position and great execution. Consolidated revenue increased 8% to $6.9 billion, with underlying growth of 5%. Operating income was $1.2 billion, and adjusted operating income was $1.5 billion, up 6%. Our adjusted operating margin was 22.7%. GAAP EPS was $1.69, and adjusted EPS was $2.03, up 10% over last year. For the first nine months of 2026, underlying revenue growth was 5%, adjusted operating income grew 7% to $6.1 billion, our adjusted operating margin was 28.1%, and adjusted EPS increased 9% to $8.29. As part of our previously announced brand change, we have updated several business descriptors in our earnings release. Guy Carpenter results are now reported as Reinsurance, and Mercer results are reported as People and Investments.

Within People and Investments, Wealth is reported as Investments and Retirement, Health as Health and Benefits, and Career as Workforce and Reward. Looking at Risk and Insurance Services, third quarter revenue was $4.2 billion, up 7% from a year ago, or 3% on an underlying basis. Operating income in RIS was $745 million. Adjusted operating income was $1 billion, up 4% over last year, and the adjusted operating margin was 24.6%. The first nine months revenue in RIS was $14.1 billion, reflecting underlying growth of 3%. Adjusted operating income increased 5% to $4.6 billion. The adjusted operating margin was 33.2%. At Marsh, revenue in the quarter was $3.7 billion, up 10% from a year ago, or 5% on an underlying basis. Despite the headwind from a soft pricing environment, sales and new business growth remain solid in areas such as digital infrastructure and transactional risk are creating demand.

In U.S. and Canada, underlying growth was 4%. In international, underlying growth was 6%, with EMEA up 7%, Asia-Pacific up 4%, and Latin America flat. The first nine months of the year, Risk revenue was $11.5 billion, with underlying growth of 4%. U.S. and Canada grew 4%, and international was up 5%. In reinsurance, revenue in the quarter was $374 million, down 6% on both a reported and underlying basis. Q3 is a small quarter for reinsurance, and revenue was impacted by continued softness in property reinsurance rates, as well as a tough comparison to a strong third quarter last year that benefited from non-recurring items. Through nine months, reinsurance is down 1% on an underlying basis, which better reflects our top-line performance this year. Significant rate pressure has more than offset strong new business growth and excellent client retention, which remains in the high 90s.

In the consulting segment, third quarter revenue was $2.7 billion, up 9%, or 8% on an underlying basis. Operating income was $563 million, and adjusted operating income was $593 million, up 9%. Our adjusted operating margin in consulting was 22.1%. For the first nine months, consulting revenue was $7.8 billion, reflecting underlying growth of 7%. Adjusted operating income increased 11% to $1.7 billion. The adjusted operating margin is 21.4%. People and Investments revenue was $1.7 billion in the quarter, up 6%, or 5% on an underlying basis. Health and benefits grew 5%, reflecting continued growth across our regions. Investments and retirement was up 8%, led by our investments business. Our assets under management were $843 billion at the end of the third quarter, flat sequentially and up 23% from the third quarter last year. Year-over-year growth was driven by new business and the impact of capital markets.

Workforce and rewards was down 1%, with growth in the U.S. and most of international offset by the impact of a challenging environment in the Middle East. For the first nine months of the year, revenue at People and Investments was $4.9 billion with 5% underlying growth. Management Consulting generated revenue of $1 billion in the third quarter, up 14% on both a reported and underlying basis. This great result reflected strong demand and delivery across the business, especially in AI-related work. The quarter also benefited from favorable timing on success fees that we had expected in the fourth quarter. For the first nine months of the year, revenue at Management Consulting was $2.9 billion, an increase of 11% on an underlying basis.

For the full year, Management Consulting is on pace for high single-digit growth, which would imply a roughly flat top line in Q4 due in part to the timing I mentioned. Fiduciary interest income was $100 million in the quarter, down $9 million from the third quarter last year. Looking ahead, we expect fiduciary interest income will be approximately $94 million in the fourth quarter. Foreign exchange was a $0.01 benefit in the third quarter. Based on current exchange rates, we expect FX will have an immaterial effect on earnings in the fourth quarter. Corporate expenses in the third quarter were $68 million on an adjusted basis compared to $71 million a year ago. Looking ahead to the fourth quarter, we expect adjusted corporate expense of approximately $80 million.

Building on John's comments on Thrive, the program is going well, and our early success has resulted in us seeing more opportunities. We now expect to generate $600 million in savings, with the vast majority of our actions taken by the end of 2028, and savings realized fairly evenly over the three years of the program. We expect costs associated with generating these savings will be approximately $750 million. So far, most of our savings have come from simplifying and streamlining our organization, right shoring actions, and efficiencies in BCS. We expect further savings in these areas. We are excited about our progress so far and the benefit we will get from the additional savings. Thrive is enabling us to accelerate investments that will help us sustain growth into the future while we continue to deliver solid results today.

Total noteworthy items in the third quarter were $170 million, including $71 million of costs associated with Thrive. Noteworthy items this quarter also included $144 million relating to the Greensill litigation. As disclosed in our 10-Q this morning, we have settled our involvement in this litigation and do not expect any additional charges relating to the case. Note that total settlement payments and costs are reflected in our statement of cash flows. Interest expense in the third quarter was $248 million. Based on our current forecast, we expect $255 million of interest expense in the fourth quarter. Our adjusted effective tax rate in the third quarter was 24.6% compared to 24.8% in the third quarter last year, with both periods benefiting modestly from discrete items. When we give forward guidance around our tax rate, we do not project discrete items.

Based on the current environment, we expect an adjusted effective tax rate of around 25% for 2026. Turning to capital management, our balance sheet. We ended the quarter with total debt of $20.5 billion. We had EUR 550 million of euro-denominated senior notes mature in September, and we intend to replace them with new euro-denominated notes in the fourth quarter. Our cash position at the end of the third quarter was $1.8 billion. Uses of cash in the quarter totaled $1.3 billion and included $476 million for dividends, $288 million for acquisitions, and $500 million for share repurchases. For the first nine months, uses of cash totaled $4 billion and included $1.4 billion for dividends, $607 million for acquisitions, and $2 billion for share repurchases.

We continue to expect to deploy approximately $5.5 billion of capital in 2026 across dividends, acquisitions, and share repurchases. The ultimate level of share repurchase will depend on how our M&A pipeline develops. For the full year, we continue to expect underlying revenue growth similar to the levels we generated in 2025, along with another year of margin expansion, solid adjusted EPS growth.

With that, I am happy to turn it back to John.

Thank you, Mark. Andrew, we are ready to begin the Q&A session.

Certainly. We will now begin the question and answer session. If you have a question, please press star one one on your touchtone phone. If you wish to be removed from the queue, please press star one one again. If you are using a speakerphone, you may need to pick up the handset before pressing the numbers. Once again, if you have a question, please press star one one on your touchtone phone. In the interest of addressing questions from as many participants as possible, we ask that participants limit themselves to one question and one follow-up question. One moment please. Our first question comes from the line of Greg Peters with Raymond James.

Good morning, everyone. Thanks for the comments on the AI and the update on Thrive. A couple of your peers have given some detail on how they plan to deploy AI to drive margin expansion. I think that might be part of what is going on with your raising the Thrive targets. Maybe you could give us some more details on what you are doing with technology and AI to drive the margin expansion.

Good morning, Greg, and thanks for the question. I spoke to it a bit in my prepared remarks. We are quite excited about what these new technologies can mean to our business, and it is not just margin expansion. I also want to reinforce the importance of it to how we serve our clients and what it can mean to our growth over time. I think that is really a critical part of what we are thinking about and how we are investing against it. We see clear benefits for our colleagues, for our clients, and earnings growth in it for our shareholders. We think we are well-positioned.

I have spoken not just on this call but on prior calls about the longstanding, deeply trusted client relationships we have, the data sets, the proprietary data sets, the analytics we have, the modeling and risk management. All of these things are fundamental to our business model. This period of change is driving a lot of growth in our consulting businesses. We are quite excited about how we are helping our clients as well. Yes, it is helping drive some efficiency for us today. We are now not quite three years into BCS. We formed BCS almost three years ago. It was in the first quarter of 2024. We are excited about the work that our team is doing there.

Looking at leveraging the best tech, not just AI, I would point out, but automating processes, challenging workflows all across the company. We had areas where we are doing things quite well. Now we are taking the best from each parts of those companies and optimizing our operating model. Paul Beswick leads all of that for us. He is doing an excellent job. His team is deep and strong. It also allows for a more efficient CapEx for us, too. We feel good about what it can mean to our margins. I am not going to speak to 2027 on this call, Greg. I will talk about that in January. Between BCS and not just AI, right shoring, automation, and the early returns from AI are all levers for us to drive future efficiency. We feel good about that.

Of course. I am going to pivot. It is on M&A, and I know you are not going to talk about your pipeline on a public call. Aon has done this very large transaction, and there is some concern in the marketplace that you might feel the need to respond with a similar big transaction. Maybe you could spend a minute and tell us about how you view your middle market presence and when you are looking at M&A, what kind of capabilities are you looking to bolt on to what you already have?

Yeah. Sure. Well, look, let me be clear. Our interest in the middle market isn't recent, right? It has been there for quite a long time. We are not following anyone. We have the best middle market business in the industry. I am incredibly proud of Marsh Agency. It has been thoughtfully constructed over 15 years by acquiring the best regional agencies all across the country. We have done over 130 deals since we began that strategy about 15 years ago. It cannot be replicated, and I wouldn't change our business for any business in the market. I remain very excited about the middle market. We have been bringing scale benefits to those customers, helping them realize other value through our services and help position our clients for better growth.

It is not, of course, just P&C. It is health and benefits, and it is a market we like quite a bit. We expect to continue to invest in that market, both organically and inorganically. Our capital management strategy, Greg, has not changed. It remains the same. We are going to be disciplined. Let me be clear. We will be disciplined and balanced in our approach. We do favor investing in the business. Our pipeline is good. There is no question about it. At least for some strategic buyers, there is a bit of a gap between bid and ask at the moment. We announced a deal on the 1st of October, a Midwest agency, top 100 agency in the Midwest that we are excited about. We closed on Asterra earlier in the third quarter.

We remain very active in the market, but again, we are going to be disciplined about how we deploy our capital. In our prepared remarks, both Mark and I touched on what we did in the third quarter. We bought back a bit more stock. We are now at $2 billion kind of year to date. Hopefully that is helpful. We have the capacity to do big deals, but we are far more likely to do a string of pearls, continue that approach.

Thank you, Greg. Andrew, do we have a follow-up?

Our next question comes from the line of Mike Zaremski with BMO.

Hey, Greg. Good morning. I guess I will start with Oliver Wyman and consulting. As we have kind of dug into the excellent growth, some consultants have talked about AI making them much more efficient and then being able to work through their backlogs faster and kind of pull forward revenues. Just curious if that is a dynamic you think is contributing to Marsh's excellent results.

Yeah, thanks Mike, and good morning. It is really terrific results. As I mentioned in my prepared remarks, it is a great opportunity in this moment of change for us to help our clients position themselves for greater success. It is not only driving growth for our business, but it is also changing the way we are doing business with our clients as well. Ted, maybe you can talk more about that.

Yeah, Mike, thank you. We had a great quarter. The performance was strong and pretty broad-based across industries and capabilities and regions. It is certainly the case that our Quotient AI platform that helps our clients transform around AI was the strongest growing part of the portfolio and has really been contributing to what is a good year for us. I would say, we ourselves, in terms of your question about how we are actually delivering for clients, we have been on that journey for probably three years now, transforming how we deliver for our clients. We are using a very sophisticated range of tools. We have built a lot of agentic solutions ourselves that can create more value for our clients. We have built a lot of specialist capabilities, so across data analytics, forward-deployed engineers that are blended into consulting teams.

Increasingly, we partner with technology companies, be that frontier model companies, hyperscalers, cloud providers, and so on. Certainly, as our business has shifted from advice 10 years ago today to really generating outcomes for our clients on their transformation journeys, we started to increase the amount of success pricing in our business. Our clients have been encouraging and willing to allow us to participate in the value that we are creating for them. I think Mark mentioned that in Q3, some of our performance was pulling forward some success fees that we might have seen in Q4. That certainly contributed to the level of growth you see in the numbers there.

Thanks, Ted. Mike, do you have a follow-up?

Yeah, a quick follow-up, maybe dovetailing on Greg Peters' question on Thrive. John, you talked about still early days of AI use cases impacting every employee's daily lives. Is it reasonable if we are thinking out into 2027 or 2028 that whether it is called Thrive or not, that there could be a much larger, broader program that is impacting Marsh when we are thinking about productivity gains?

Look, I would say, Mike, we are excited about the path that we are on. As I said, it is early, so I do not want to get ahead of ourselves. There is a lot involved, and the tools are changing and changing fairly rapidly. We will see whether they continue to change at the same pace. But our colleagues are actively using these tools. Our tech team, again, led by Paul Beswick, has done a terrific job. We have built a proprietary model that we call LenAI inside of our company, and we introduce new tools literally every week to our colleagues.

Now, every one of those tools impacts different parts of our employee population, our colleague population, in different ways. I am very encouraged by the take-up rate. So yeah, we are transforming the way we operate, and we see certainly efficiency possibilities down the road. More important than anything else is how we serve our customer and what that can mean to our growth.

Thanks, Mike. Andrew, next question, please.

Our next question comes from the line of Rob Cox with Goldman Sachs.

Hey, good morning. My first question just on competition in the marketplace. Just thinking about levered private brokers right now, it seems like the softening pricing environment and higher interest rates combo could put some pressure on their business models right now, and it seems like there could be some disruption going on. I'm just wondering if you think that could help Marsh potentially win some more business in the open market, win on talent, or potentially make opportunistic M&A more attractive.

Yeah. Thanks, Rob. I want to be careful because there's obviously a range of PE-owned or levered back kind of brokers out there. Some are much smaller than others, and of course, they serve kind of different markets. What I would say, though, is that we're certainly well capitalized. We have the ability to invest in our business again, and I'm talking about organic investment really here. What I'm excited about is how scale is going to matter through this period of transformation. Again, it's why I keep reinforcing the deep, long-standing trusted client relationships, the proprietary data sets, the analytics we have, the modeling all being improved with new technology. I don't think it's debatable that scale matters in this changing time. That has us incredibly well-positioned.

I think it'll help us win business, of course, organically in the market, but it's also going to help us probably as the M&A pipeline develops over time as well, where others will realize it'll be difficult to invest at the same rate that we're investing. I'm excited about how we're positioned competitively. It starts with our people. Our people still matter. They are what deliver the insights to our clients, and we have the deepest, best talent in the marketplace.

Yeah. Thank you, and that's helpful. Just maybe on the AI exclusion discussion. I know there's been some media coverage about brokers being against broad AI exclusions and policies, and I was hoping you could unpack that view for us a little bit, and any views you guys have on that.

Yeah. I will ask Nick to talk about it in a second. AI is embedded in most companies' workflows in lots of different ways and processes and products, right? A broad-based exclusion could create real confusion and uncertainty. We are not trying to poke insurers. We just are really trying to have a thoughtful discussion about how this might change exposures, very limited claim activity to date, and really better understand how these risks aggregate. By the way, kudos to Nick and to Dean for leading on this issue, really for the broader marketplace. Nick, maybe you could talk. We are just back from a conference actually, where we had a lot of engagement on this conversation.

Yeah. I do want to emphasize that we see our role here as to advise our clients, look out for the best interests of our clients while working with carriers, and with the reinsurance markets to make sure that the market is reflecting the risks that are there. If I unpack it a little bit, there are two. We certainly see two, and there is possibly over time, a third category will emerge. The first category is just where AI is an elaboration or an evolution of an existing risk or peril. It will be impossible to unbundle it from the causal pathways to whatever outcome may be. That is really where we were focused on not excluding things which we think would lead to uncertainty, to contention, to gaps in cover.

There are places, a second category, where AI risks will require us to evolve established products or services because the AI exposes gaps or flaws in the existing marketplace, and there is an evolutionary opportunity there. Now, we are not certain there is a third category where there is something totally unique to AI that has never been previously contemplated in the insurance market, but we are open to the possibility. In all three categories, we are working with our clients and looking to work with carriers, to help the market evolve.

Terrific. Thank you, Nick. Thank you, Rob. Andrew, next question.

Our next question comes from the line of Meyer Shields with KBW.

Great. Thanks so much, and good morning. Mark, you mentioned the, I guess, pull forward acceleration of the success fees in Oliver Wyman. I was hoping you could give us a sense as to maybe the revenue and earnings impact of that.

Yeah, Meyer, we wanted to point it out. It's certainly not explaining the preponderance of growth in management consulting. Even without that management consulting had a very strong growth quarter. But as Ted mentioned, success fees are becoming a bigger part of how we're structuring fees with clients. It's good for us to spend that gain sharing. So that was a factor, but management consulting had strong growth year to date, but we just wanted to point that out.

Yeah, just a quick one. If we take the commentary from the Marsh Index, it looks like property pricing got a little bit less bad to 10% down from 12%. Are the books of business that renew in the second quarter comparable to the third?

Yeah. Good question. You called it less bad. I want to point out it is very good for our clients, right? Rate relief is we are trying to have efficient risk financing, right, for our clients. But of course, it does impact our growth. I would not over-index certainly on a quarter, but I would also say, Meyer, that even in Marsh Risk, right? More of our property cat renewals exist in the first and second quarter. So yes, there is a bit of a different mix of business here in the third quarter. Hopefully that helps.

Thank you, Meyer. Andrew, next question, please.

Our next question comes from the line of David Motemaden with Evercore ISI.

Hey, thanks. Good morning. I know it's a smaller reinsurance quarter, but the growth there over the last three quarters has been or at least over the prior two, has been softer than your peers. Could you just unpack some of the moving pieces there between net new and then the drag from pricing? If we should expect the same type of growth as we've seen in the first nine months into 2027, given the pricing environment sounds like it will continue.

Sure. Good morning, David. Thank you. As Mark noted, we're -1% through nine months, which we think is really kind of reflective of where we are. Mark spoke, of course, about pricing and the impact of that. We're a bit overweight on property cat relative to some others. We're a bit overweight U.S. as well compared to some others. We had a bit, it was a noisy quarter in the third quarter too. A small quarter, but also a bit noisy with some non-recurring items. We've been hit a little bit by some of the consolidation that's happened in the industry as well during the course of the year. But again, no excuses. We're well-positioned. We think the best reinsurance team in the market.

I would also point out to you, David, that some business that we do for the insurance industry and our companies and Oliver Wyman Actuarial, Oliver Wyman, and some business in Marsh Risk as well. It's a critical business to us. It's really important on so many levels. We feel like we're well-positioned. Dean and the team see good growth in FAC and M&A advisory, alternative capital, alternative structures driving opportunities. We're facing some market headwinds. We've seen them before, but we feel good about how we're positioned over the medium to long term.

I do, yeah. Thanks for that, John. Just within the management consulting business, it sounds like the growth there is being driven by Quotient, the AI transformation. It sounds like some competitors are passing through some of the AI efficiencies that they're getting in their business through, I guess, lowering price to improve volume in AI transformation engagements. Is that something that you guys are doing? Is it something you're considering? Just hoping for a little bit of color there. Thank you.

Yeah. I would first note, David, that our growth is more broad-based than Quotient, and maybe I'll ask Pat to talk about some of the impacts in a second in people and investments as well. Ted, maybe you could talk about We're excited about AI driving greater value of work that we're doing, as opposed to it driving some pricing change. Ted, maybe you can start and pass it off to Pat.

Yeah. I would just reiterate John's point that the growth was pretty broad based. To give you another example, we saw pretty good demand, for example, in our M&A business and our post-merger integration business over the last quarter as well. The nature of work is changing, and a lot of the AI transformation work that we are doing brings different skills in. The pricing structures change a little bit. As I mentioned, outcome-based pricing is growing a little bit. But we're seeing our clients are really happy to pay for value.

One of the points that John drew out in his comments was around the private equity companies that are increasingly bringing us in to look at their portfolio companies and do everything from AI strategy to cost transformation to agentic commerce and so on. I think we see a multi-year transformation for a lot of our client base around AI, and that's why we're very excited about the opportunities for Quotient, for us, and for our clients.

Yeah. Thanks for the question as well. We're pleased with our overall growth across the people and investments business and across the various different practices. On AI, we see that probably the most at this point inside of our workforce and rewards practice. Our overarching view on it is that the potential impact to the business, I would say, is positive. It's strengthening our opportunity with clients and the value we're delivering. We are seeing clients expecting us to use AI in our work, right? Where I would say the biggest impact we're seeing is they're expecting faster timelines. They expect it to be used responsibly. They expect us to be able to protect their data. They also expect increased speed to value, I think Ted was hitting on this, and increased speed to outcomes, and that's what we're really seeing the most.

We've got proprietary data sets, as John has mentioned in his opening, and those differentiated data sets, combined with our AI capabilities that we're building to be able to drive value for clients and with our consultants and recommendations, is really allowing us to create more precision, more relevance for clients, and getting them the outcomes that they're looking for faster. I would say also that clients also understand, the question was about cost. The clients also understand that AI is not free. They're all seeing it on their side as well, and they expect us to continue to invest in AI tools and invest in the platform to be able to go ahead and deliver them these outcomes in a faster, more consistent basis, to where they can go ahead and capture speed to value.

Thanks, Pat. David, I would add that, as I mentioned, the Len suite of tools that we're introducing to our colleagues are able to handle overwhelmingly the work that we do for our clients and how it's changed our processes internally. We do use frontier models, third-party frontier models, when working with our clients, and we build those costs into the pricing of the work that we're doing for our clients.

Thank you, David. Andrew, next question, please.

Our next question comes from the line of Bob Huang with Morgan Stanley.

Yeah, good morning. One thing I want to just maybe unpack a little bit is if we look at the EMEA business within Risk and Insurance Services. EMEA not only had a strong quarter, in fact, EMEA had a really strong year. As we think about the drivers here, can you maybe just help us, give us a little bit more details in terms of how durable is this business, what is kind of driving it now, and then where are the drivers going from here? What is driving the growth? Thank you for that.

Yeah. Thanks, Bob. We have outstanding team, incredibly well-positioned, all throughout that region. I will ask Nick to unpack some of the drivers of growth there.

Yes. I think very robust, strong business, quite diversified in the geographic range of the region. We had really strong growth, very high single-digit growth in new business, strong growth in specialties. Actually, so specialty-wise, growth in cyber, credit, marine. We saw growth in FAC where we work very closely with Dean's teams. We saw growth in capturing some of what had previously been leakage to the wholesale markets through our London wholesaler, through McGriff MMA London. Growth in facilities. Growth across the board.

I would add, Bob, that obviously there's a tremendous amount of disruption given the ongoing geopolitical conflict all throughout the region. We have over 2,500 colleagues in the Middle East. We're incredibly proud of their resilience, their focus on delivering for our clients. I just want to point out the Middle East part of that territory as we reported, and growth has remained resilient for us as a company.

Yeah, no, thank you for that. I really appreciate it. My follow-up is a little bit more on consulting. I know we've talked about AI workload, things of that nature, but I want to maybe focus a little bit on the traditional work. As we go into this year so far and going into next year, do you see any visible signs of maybe the traditional non-AI related consulting work perhaps facing pressure or cannibalization from AI implementation? Does it make sense that as AI becomes a bigger part of the business, that AI workload will start to cannibalize or become a bigger part of consulting going forward? If that makes sense.

I'm not sure I really understand your question. Maybe I'll share a couple of thoughts that come to mind, right? So obviously AI's driving a lot of change inside of companies all around the world, and Ted spoke and Pat both spoke about how that's driving some opportunity for us at the moment. What I would also though say, in my prepared remarks, I talked about broader change, right? Geopolitical conflict, geoeconomics. I didn't talk much about extreme weather. It's been obviously a relatively modest year from a cat risk perspective. But all of these themes, social issues, labor market challenges, all driving lots of change and uncertainty for clients.

All of those factors, not just AI, are driving demand for our services, not just in consulting, but in risk as well, right? One of the unique attributes about our firm is that we help clients understand their risks, develop a plan to mitigate those risks, help them finance some of those tail risks when that's appropriate, and we do that in lots of different ways. We also help them capture the opportunity in this moment. That's really why we're coming together on one unified brand and why we're excited about not just helping companies build greater resilience in this time of change, but using that resilience as an offensive weapon so that our clients can help grow and thrive in moments like this.

Hopefully that helps. Andrew, next question.

Our next question comes from the line of Elyse Greenspan with Wells Fargo.

Hi. Thanks. Good morning. My first question is on the margins guidance for the year. You guys pointed to margin improvement for 2026. I just wanted to clarify, do you guys expect margin improvement for the year in both segments or just on an overall basis?

Yeah. Thanks, Elyse, and good morning. We don't guide by segment, but as Mark and I both noted in our prepared remarks, we do expect continued margin expansion for the year for the company. Again, we want to balance margin expansion with continued investment in future growth. We want to deliver growth in earnings for our company over the long term, of course. We delivered solid growth in adjusted EPS in the quarter and margins were flat. We do expect to drive margin expansion for the year for the company.

Yeah, thanks. My second question. You guys had called out, I think, transactional-oriented businesses and data centers as benefiting the U.S. and Canada organic growth in the quarter. Can you just give us a sense of the contribution in the Q3 and how that's compared to other quarters this year and any sense of expectations going forward as well?

Yeah. We're not going to give exact revenue contribution from those sectors and obviously it's a dynamic economy and we're continuing to invest in areas where we see growth, right? So digital infrastructure has been an area where we've been investing. The active M&A environment has driven some growth for us there, and we continue to invest there. Healthcare continues to be a strong driver of demand. Private capital, Ted spoke about it, but it's more broad-based than just in our management consulting team. We're seeing real opportunities in energy, did I mention energy? I can't recall, sorry. I mentioned energy. We're investing against kind of the fast-moving rivers, if you will that are out there and both transaction risk and we just wanted to call out how transaction risk and digital infrastructure continue to be good sources of growth for us.

Do you have a follow-up, Elyse? Or was that the second one? I can't remember. Sorry about that.

Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) Q3 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Company Participants