With a combined revenue of $21 trillion and $2.1 trillion in profits, the 2026 Fortune 500 is the definitive list of America's largest companies.

Fortune 500

Almost $20 trillion in revenue—and a record-breaking $1.87 trillion in profits. Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive list of the biggest companies in America.

Industries included in the sector are banks, insurance, and real estate companies.

Fortune Sector Leaders: Financials

The Fortune 500, in its 70th year in 2024, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

The Fortune 500, in its 69th year in 2023, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 68th running of the list.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 67th running of the list.

Markel is a holding company for insurance, reinsurance, and investment operations around the world. Subsidiary Markel Ventures makes investments in companies outside of the insurance sector.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 66th running of the list.

F500-2020-335-Markel

Headquartered near Richmond, Va. and founded in 1930, Markel is a financial holding company for an array of insurance, industrial, and service, and investment businesses.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 65th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 64th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 63rd running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 62nd running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 61st running of the list. Wal-Mart claims the top spot again. See who made the list.

Wal-Mart stayed on top as its sales crept closer to half-a-trillion dollars. Apple moved into the top five. And UnitedHealth Group continued its steady climb. 

Key Financials (last Fiscal Year)

Revenues ($M)

Profits ($M)

Assets ($M)

Total Stockholder Equity ($M)

Profit Ratios

Profit as % of Revenues

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholder Equity

Earnings Per Share (last Fiscal Year)

Earnings Per Share ($)

EPS % Change (from prior fiscal year)

EPS % Change (5 year annual rate)

EPS % Change (10 year annual rate)

Total Return

Total Return to Investors (last year)

Total Return to Investors (5 year, annualized)

Total Return to Investors (10 year, annualized)

The Markel Group is an insurance, investment, and venture capital company, founded in 1930 during the Great Depression. Today, its core business is its specialty insurance arm, which focuses on “hard-to-price complex risks” like business casualties, personal events, and market bonds. As of 2025, it also owns nearly two dozen companies in the eastern U.S., including in the transportation, real estate, and construction industries.

Q3 2026

Q2 2026

Q1 2026

Q4 2025

Q3 2025

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Q4 2024

Markel Group (MKL): Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings

legacy

Markel Group

markel group

Good morning, and welcome to the Markel Group third quarter 2026 conference call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your touch tone phone. To withdraw your question, please press star then one again. During the call today, we may make forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. They are based on current assumptions and opinions concerning a variety of known and unknown risks. Actual results may differ materially from those contained in or suggested by such forward-looking statements.

Additional information about factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements is included in the press release for our third quarter 2026 results, as well as our most recent annual report on Form 10-K and quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including under the captions "Safe Harbor and Cautionary Statement" and "Risk Factors." We may also discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures during today's call. You may find the most directly comparable GAAP measures and a reconciliation to GAAP for those measures in the press release for our third quarter 2026 results or in our most recent Form 10-Q. The press release for our third quarter 2026 results, as well as our Form 10-K and Form 10-Q, can be found on our website at www.mklgroup.com in the investor relations section. Please note this event is being recorded.

I would now like to turn the conference over to Tom Gayner, Chief Executive Officer. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Kendra. Good morning. Thank you all for joining us. We are pleased to report a quarter of strong performance across our operating businesses, as well as ongoing disciplined capital allocation. As always, our aim is to relentlessly compound your capital over time. Two things drive our ability to do so. First, over decades, we have built an array of resilient, market-leading, and growing businesses across industries and geographies. These businesses produce cash, maintain conservative balance sheets, and produce low-cost insurance float. They create a foundation that lets us continually learn, iterate, and improve. Second, we reinvest the cash our businesses produce across a full 360-degree set of opportunities. Our existing businesses, acquisitions, publicly traded securities, and the repurchase of our own shares. We always aim to put capital to its best and highest use, and we do so with cost and tax efficiency.

We live by our culture known as the Markel Style, which describes our long-term ownership mindset. This approach, in turn, attracts businesses, leaders, and colleagues who share our values and want to win. Given the normal short-term volatility in our operating results from mark-to-market swings in our publicly traded investment portfolio, we measure progress in the dual time horizons of forever and right now. For the forever or long term, we look at the growth in five-year average operating income per share relative to our equity capital base. This five-year average operating income, along with total shareholder return, underpins our management team's compensation. Over the last five years, the quarter ending September 30, 2026, we have compounded five-year average operating income per share at 16% a year. For the right now, shorter term periods like a quarter or a year, we look at adjusted operating income.

Adjusted operating income excludes the market value movement in our equity portfolio and the amortization of acquired intangible assets. In the third quarter, adjusted operating income rose 14% to $707 million. Given our ongoing buyback program, adjusted operating income per share rose 15% in the quarter. We think there are four key takeaways from our business performance this quarter. First, we continue to see positive momentum in our insurance operations. Ongoing underwriting premiums grew 9%. The team continues to find ways to grow its book of business profitably in an increasingly challenging market. The combined ratio improved to 91.9%, even after absorbing three points from the Global Re run-off. Our three ongoing divisions released reserves again, $445 million year to date against $397 million at this point last year. Second, we also saw strength in our businesses outside insurance. Industrial adjusted operating income rose 29% on 10% organic revenue growth.

Financial rose 30%, and consumer and other widened their margins. These businesses continued their long track record of generating cash, earning strong returns on capital, and providing Markel with durable strength and resilience. Third, higher interest rates produce increased cash flow. Net investment income rose 5% in the quarter to $258 million and 8% year-to-date to $770 million. Fourth, we continued to repurchase Markel shares. We bought back $315 million of our shares in the quarter and $685 million year to date. We bought more than 1% of our shares in the third quarter and have now reduced our total share count by more than 10% over the last five years.

We've bought back these shares at what we believe are attractive discounts to intrinsic value per share. We believe each repurchased share will increase the compounding of Markel's per share value over the long term. Before I hand things over, I'd like to take a moment to recognize and thank Steve Markel. Steve recently retired as Chairman after more than 50 years with Markel Group. Steve hired me more than 35 years ago when I was a young investor with a lot to learn. For me and many others, he has served as a mentor. He embodies the Markel Style. Steve's analytical rigor and passion have been a cornerstone for Markel, and they will have a lasting impact. Thank you, Steve. As Chair and CEO, I'm fortunate to work with Simon Wilson and Andrew Crowley, who have been named Co-Presidents of the holding company.

Their expanded roles and involvement in the Markel Leadership Council, along with our lead independent director, Mike O'Reilly, bring them closer to the center of how we lead and govern the company. At this point, Simon will provide a brief review of our insurance results, as well as an update on the adverse development cover that we just announced. Andrew will follow with comments on industrial, financial, and consumer and other. Brian will then cover highlights of our consolidated financial results before we open the line for your questions. As always, we appreciate your support as long-term shareholders of Markel, and we hope you share our enthusiasm for continuing to build the intrinsic value of each share of your company. Simon?

Thank you, Tom, and good morning. We continue to make good progress simplifying and improving Markel Insurance. Excluding Global Re and the impact of the Hagerty transition, premiums grew 9% in the quarter. Our combined ratio was 91.9%, despite three points of impact from our run-off Global Re division. Behind those numbers is disciplined underwriting. We are growing where we see attractive returns and pulling back where we don't. In U.S. Wholesale and Specialty, premiums declined 3% as we deliberately reduced construction-related casualty and remained disciplined in a softer property market. The combined ratio was 89.0%. International premiums grew 45%, led by Marine, Structured Portfolio Solutions, and our regional businesses in Europe and Asia Pacific, with an 89.9% combined ratio for the quarter. In Programs and Solutions, the combined ratio improved to 87.0% from 94.2% a year ago. We are also continuing to see strength in our reserves.

Our three ongoing divisions have released $445 million reserves year-to-date, compared with $397 million at this point last year. At the same time, we are taking decisive action on legacy exposures. The agreement we've reached with Enstar provides $1.2 billion of adverse development protection above the covered reserves across Global Re and certain other exited lines. This is about creating greater certainty around the run-off and allowing us to focus even more squarely on the ongoing specialty insurance business. The premium for the adverse development cover will be funded by management margin in the reserves and will have an immaterial impact on the underwriting results in the fourth quarter. This deal was done at the time of Markel's choosing and makes strategic and economic sense for the business. Finally, we are managing our business tightly while investing for the future.

Each of our three ongoing divisions has reduced its expense ratio year to date, even as we continue to invest in our core systems, data, and AI. Our ambition is to build the preeminent specialty insurer in the world. Strong underwriting profitability, disciplined growth, improving efficiency, and decisive action on legacy exposures are all evidence of the progress we're making. There's more to do, but I believe that Markel Insurance enters 2027 from a position of real strength. With that, I'll hand it to Andrew.

Thank you, Simon. It is a privilege to share an update on our industrial, financial, and consumer and other businesses. In total, for the third quarter, revenue and adjusted operating income for these segments increased 10% and 35% respectively. I will take the next few minutes to provide additional insight into each segment, including some context around the strength Tom previously mentioned. For our industrial segment, last quarter, we noted that decreasing profitability and increasing revenue was a trend we did not expect to continue. This quarter, results improved, with revenue up 13% and adjusted operating income up 29%. The quarter-to-quarter change reflects both the natural variability of large-scale construction and capital equipment manufacturing and deliberate actions by our leaders to improve profitability.

Quarterly growth was driven primarily by our precast concrete and fire and life safety businesses, which in recent years have invested in facilities, people, and selective acquisitions to meet rising demand. Looking forward, backlogs remain strong, reflecting demand for high-quality solutions for the build-out of data centers and other critical commercial and industrial infrastructure. In the financial segment, third quarter revenue and adjusted operating income increased 13% and 30% respectively. Higher revenue from our insurance-linked securities business was the primary driver of the increase, with additional strength from our lender services business. The increase in revenue and profitability from our insurance-linked securities business is another step forward in the multi-year effort by our team to develop innovative solutions for risk transfer at a price and structure that meet investor demand. Short-term results from this effort can and will vary, but our commitment to innovating and stewarding capital will not.

Lastly, in consumer and other, revenue and adjusted operating income increased 2% and 80% for the quarter, respectively. As a reminder, profitability in this segment is highest in the second quarter, given ornamental plant sales are seasonal and peak in the spring. As a result, modest profit increases in other businesses during the first, third, and fourth quarters can have a large impact on the year-over-year percentage change. In summary, our businesses across these segments are navigating complex market dynamics such as skilled labor shortages, geopolitical uncertainty, technological change, and inflationary pressures, all while delivering revenue and profit growth. Strong leaders empowered to respond to the challenges and opportunities they face are core to our long-term approach. Stepping back, as we highlighted during the Reunion in May, we remain focused on long-term earnings growth outpacing capital growth across Markel.

The quality of our businesses and leaders is critical to achieving that result, as is our capital discipline. Over the past several years, we have deployed capital into our existing businesses, investing behind proven leaders in essential industries we know well. As we look ahead, we will maintain our relentless search to identify additional opportunities, both within our family and beyond, that meet our long-term criteria. With that, I will hand it to Brian.

Thank you, Andrew. As a reminder, our press release and 10-Q include full consolidated segment and divisional results. I'll cover some financial highlights of our consolidated results before we open the call to answer your questions. Operating revenues, which exclude net investment gains, rose 6% in the quarter to $4.2 billion and 2% year-to-date to $11.7 billion. Operating income, which includes unrealized net investment gains and losses, was $383 million for the quarter, compared with $1 billion a year ago. The difference is the equity market valuation changes. Unrealized net investment losses of $281 million this quarter versus unrealized gains of $433 million in the third quarter of 2025. Adjusted operating income, which excludes net investment gains and losses and amortization of acquired intangible assets, rose 14% in the quarter to $707 million from $621 million a year ago.

Year-to-date, adjusted operating income was $1.6 billion, compared with $1.7 billion for the first nine months of 2025. Net income to common shareholders for the third quarter was $259 million, or $18.15 per diluted share, compared with $751 million or $59.25 a year ago. Year to date, net income to common shareholders was $1.2 billion or $91.90 per diluted share, compared with $1.5 billion or $120.60 in the prior year's comparable period. Our equity portfolio stands at $13.1 billion at quarter end, including $9 billion of cumulative pre-tax unrealized gains. Higher interest rates lowered the market value of our bond portfolio, resulting in an other comprehensive loss of $416 million after tax in the quarter. Those bonds move back towards par as they mature, and we are investing new insurance float and bond maturity proceeds at today's higher yields.

Net investment income for the year totaled $770 million, up 8% from a year ago. Our holding company ended the quarter with $3.6 billion in invested assets. We funded $315 million in share repurchases in the quarter, bringing our year-to-date total to $685 million. Acquisitions totaled $9 million in the quarter, all bolt-ons within our existing businesses. Within public equities, we were net sellers of $75 million in the quarter. Finally, regarding the $205 million bad debt charge recognized in the second quarter at State National, we previously shared that we engaged an outside actuarial firm to help assess that exposure, and the conclusions of that work were reflected in the charge we recognized, which was conservative and in line with our philosophy of establishing loss reserves that are more likely redundant than deficient. Consistent with this, we have not recognized any additional bad debt charges in the third quarter.

We also continued implementing proactive enhancements to State National's processes, completing a comprehensive internal review of the potential impact of further deterioration of loss trends on the entire portfolio. We are confident in the health of our credit exposures. With that, we will turn it back to Kendra to open it up for your questions.

We will now begin the question-and-answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your touch tone phone. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your question, please press star then one again. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble our roster. Your first question from the line of Andrew Kligerman with TD Cowen. Andrew, your line is open. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning, Markel team. My first question is around the adverse development cover. I am wondering if you could share more detail. The details that I did not see in the Q and the release were, how much of the investment portfolio or reserves rather, will be transferred over? What will be the lost net investment income? Ultimately, Simon, I think you mentioned it would be EPS neutral in the fourth quarter, but looking out to next year, what would ultimately be the EPS dilution or accretion? Again, reserves transferred, net investment income, and EPS dilution or accretion, all looking at 2027.

Yeah, thanks, Andrew. This is Brian. The high level of the transaction, the total reserves subject to that are $4.8 billion. We transfer $2.25 billion of that to Enstar and keep the remaining portion on our books to run off as normal. Then for that, we have a $1.2 billion adverse development cover on top of that, and we pay $120 million risk premium. So that is kind of the general financial terms of the transaction in the press release. In terms of the net investment income, I think a good proxy for that is around a 4% yield on that pre-tax, on that $2.25 billion that we transfer over to Enstar. It is a little bit higher than the rate in the Q, as these are the more in the tail reserves that we are moving. We pay our piece of the reserves first.

Enstar then picks up after that our retention is exhausted. In terms of EPS for next year, we are not going to give any guidance on that. What I would say is in the fourth quarter, consistent with what Simon said, we have the risk premium coming through. We have additional management margin that we would be releasing in the fourth quarter. We expect those two to be relatively neutral.

Got it. Okay. That was really helpful. We can do the math on what you provided there. Then looking at the prior year development, adding 5.2 percentage points benefit to the loss ratio, could you share a little bit on the geography of that? What I mean is, what proportion of short tail versus long tail? On the long tail side, could you share a little bit about the accident years that you are seeing and, if possible, I mean, it's a lot, but where is it coming from? Well, actually we have that in the Q, whether it's wholesale or programs or International. So yeah, that's the question.

Sure. Andrew, it's Brian again. What I would say is in the U.S., it's a fair amount coming from first-party lines, so that's your property, inland marine, personal lines, along with workers' compensation. Obviously, the property is going to be your more recent years with it being shorter tail. The workers' comp is more spread out, including in some more of the back years. On your professional and casualty, more neutral, I would say, across those lines. A few pieces going up a little bit, a few pieces going down a little bit, but relatively stable in that space. Then the last place within the International division, releases within our marine and energy product and then some releases kind of across the portfolio, across many of the other products.

The one place where we did have some adverse trend is in the Global Re business, and that was specific to transaction liability due to some recent claims that have come our way the last kind of three to six months.

Got it. When you said professional and casualty were neutral, accident years were pretty much neutral as well, nothing jumping out?

Yeah, nothing in the back years. We have our normal kind of roll-on, roll-off of margin that hits the more recent years, but pretty neutral.

Your next question from the line of Andrew Andersen with Jefferies. Andrew, your line is open. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning. With the combined ratio running in the low 90s year to date, how do you think about the durability of that level of profitability as certain markets soften? Where do you see the biggest offsets from some of the good underwriting actions and portfolio mix that have been helping recent results?

Thanks, Andrew. It's Simon. We've been working really hard to get that combined ratio down in the low 90s. You'll have known that from all of the different things we've done over the course of the last 18 months or so. In terms of what happens going into next year, we're going to be working really, really hard to keep this consistency going. What I would say, I think the portfolio has improved significantly over the last two years, just as the announcement yesterday with the Global Re. That's been a drag on results for a period of time now, and essentially, that noise goes away as we go into 2027. So I see that as a positive. The other areas where we've been working very hard on portfolio on the defensive side has been around U.S. casualty.

Again, I've mentioned on several of these calls, but that construction casualty, which we've really worked on over the last 18 months, is something which I think will, over time, benefit the combined ratio. That said, there are headwinds. Whether it be in the property market generally across the world, particularly here in the U.S., whether that be in various of the London market lines, we are seeing softening, and that's going to have an impact on the overall economics. But the good thing I think about our portfolio overall is that we sell around about, I think it's about 100 different products around the planet. A lot of those, where we're really focusing on, is the small to medium-sized risk, whether that be in the U.S. space or that good growing European business that I mentioned in my opening comments.

That's the type of business which is less impacted by a sort of overall softening behavior across the marketplace. I think when we get good at that, whether it's with technology or with the way in which we're going to market and the products that we're selling there, that's where I think we've got some degree of ballast across the portfolio overall. So I can't say for certain what the results are going to be next year. But I think we're just really strongly positioned from a portfolio perspective to continue this degree of consistency that we've generated over the last five or so quarters now.

Thanks. Could you quantify the capital that you expect the ADC transaction to release? How should we think about the timing of that release versus allowing the reserves to run off naturally?

Yeah. Andrew, it's Brian. I would say a rough estimate is a little under half a billion. One thing to remind there is we don't think of that as capital coming out. The capital that we have in our insurance operations to support what we need to support our business is really held in public equities. So really that's an opportunity for us down the road to take that capital, redeploy it into growth opportunities within our existing three divisions.

Okay. With that, I guess I'm just wondering, Markel, you guys have substantial financial flexibility, and you've been funding buybacks from internally generated earnings. So how important was an accelerated capital release for the rationale for the transaction versus simply reducing uncertainty around these legacy and run-off reserves?

Yeah. This is Tom. To reduce the uncertainty and to have a forward-looking way to run the business. The good news is we have good, robust capital positions, and we have 360 degrees of opportunity, whether it's to invest in our existing business, make acquisitions, to buy publicly traded securities, or repurchase our own shares. We have the capital to execute what we want to do. This is about reducing uncertainty.

Okay. And sorry, one more. You mentioned kind of investing into public equities. I would've thought at this valuation level that capital release would be going really through buyback. I imagine it's all kind of the same pot, but should we think of some buyback from this capital release as well?

I think the good news is, money is fungible, so I do not really check whether it is from my left pocket or my right pocket. The good news is the pockets have money in them. We have continued to repurchase shares and have expectations of continuing to do so. When I do the math of what of those 360 degrees we should be pointed at, Markel stock seems to be at the top of the list.

Your next question from the line of Tracy Benguigui with Wolfe Research. Tracy, your line is open. Please go ahead.

Thank you, and congrats on your ADC. To be sure, I am assuming that this ADC excludes State National. If that is the case, do you feel like reserves are adequate there and you did not have to market an ADC for those liabilities? Or did you try to extend the ADC to State National and you just did not get an appetite from your counterparty or other counterparties?

Yeah. Tracy, it's Brian. The ADC does not include State National. We did not look to include State National in the transaction. This was about the legacy reserves and run-off portfolios that we have within our insurance business. As I mentioned, we did a lot of work at State National this period in kind of stressing out the reserves, increasing the loss trends above what we're holding considerably, and feel good about where that landed from being able to manage the collateral and capital position.

Okay. Also year to date, your favorable prior year development implies a steep ramp to meet your 2026 $800 million reserve release guide. Do you have a new guide or do you get there mechanically since essentially $800 million is implied 5% of your 2025 reserves? Should we simply reduce the reserve base by the $4.8 billion ADC subject to reserves?

I think that's the number, the range that we put in the K each year of what it could possibly be. I think that's the top end of the range. We consistently released reserves every quarter consistent with our reserving philosophy. I would expect the fourth quarter, nothing different to change there.

Okay. Just real quick on NII, I appreciate the commentary, but is it fair to assume that a counterparty would not want equities, so you'd be giving up fixed income securities and you may need to rebalance your assets after the deal closes?

We will be giving up fixed income securities. That's correct. We matched kind of the securities that we're giving up kind of with the payout pattern. I don't expect any rebalancing to kind of manage our liquidity.

Your next question from the line of Maxwell Fritscher with Truist Securities. Maxwell, your line is open. Please go ahead.

Thank you. I'm calling in for Mark Hughes. I just had a couple of questions on two specific lines of business. More broadly, for general liability, so far through earnings, on average, premiums are decelerating and some of your peers are highlighting a moderating price environment. I just wanted to get your observations there. How's competition? Are you finding that pricing is still running ahead of loss costs?

Yeah. In that, I specifically talk about the U.S. casualty or the U.S. general liability marketplace. When we talk about that, it's a very, very broad marketplace. With primary casualty, we have excess casualty. What we are finding are there are pockets which are very difficult, and several competitors have mentioned this in their calls. I would put those out there as the trucking business, the habitational business, and the construction business. We do not and have not done a lot of trucking or habitational business in the past. We did have a reasonable chunk of construction liability on our books, and so I feel more able to comment on that space. I think in that particular area, we continue to see claims trending higher. People have used the number sort of in the double-digit numbers there. I wouldn't disagree with that.

I think the amount of premium and the rate that people are getting in that marketplace doesn't match the trend that we're seeing. That's why we actively reduced our exposure in that particular area. That said, I think also in the excess casualty marketplace as well, I think that is a difficult part of the market to really get the rate above the trend at the moment. So we're treading cautiously in that area as well. There are areas of the primary market where I think we have specific expertise. We feel good about our ability to underwrite in that space and our ability to get the premium, which is sufficient for the risk that we're taking on board. So we're kind of doubling down in those areas and making sure that our expertise and our capability of selling in those areas. For example, the environmental space.

Healthcare is another area that we've done quite well in recently. So we're picking our spots, and we're also probably trending towards smaller and medium-sized business in that particular area. The general commentary that it's a difficult market, I think, is correct, but it's also a very big market, and I think there's places where you can play successfully, and that's what we're doing at the moment and where we have confidence that we can make a good return over a long period of time.

Great. Thank you for the color there. Then I guess switching gears to workers' comp. One competitor highlighted increased claims frequency there. Had to take up loss picks. Any thoughts on pricing there? Is competition still rational, and are you observing any changes in the environment from workers' comp?

Again, workers' comp is a big market over here. Different states have different behaviors. I think in general, we've seen fairly flattish rate. It's not a market that's had huge swings in terms of pricing. I mentioned property earlier, which you have seen a very big, kind of like it steeply went up back in 2022, 2023, and then has come back down again over the course of the last 12 to 18 months. Workers' comp has been at a much slower trend, and certainly in our particular part of the market, and we really do focus on the small end of workers' comp, and it's generally monoline workers' comp as well. We haven't seen a significant drop-off in rate in that particular area.

We remain happy with the book of business that we have, which is a little different than some others that play in the medium to large space in the marketplace. But, yeah, we haven't seen any dramatic drop-off in that particular segment.

Again, if you have a question, please press star then one. Your next question from the line of Andrew Kligerman with TD Cowen. Andrew, your line is open. Please go ahead.

Hello again. I was particularly interested in the industrial segment and the quick turnaround. I think Andrew mentioned in the opening remarks that there could be some volatility. Then as you kind of fleshed it out a little bit, it sounds like you've got some good exposure to data centers and industrial infrastructure. Then you mentioned a lot of backlog. So what changed from quarter to quarter? It was kind of a steep turnaround. Then going forward, it sounds very exciting and what we saw in the third quarter could be kind of a trend over the next few quarters or so. So maybe a little color on those two points.

Andrew, this is Andrew. Appreciate the question and interest in our industrial businesses. You're right, the change from the first half of the year to the third quarter was marked by significant profit increase year over year in the most recent results. When I step back, similar to what Simon said a minute ago, we operate across a variety of markets within that segment, whether it be bakery equipment, precast concrete, fire and life safety, a whole host of others, equipment leasing. So there's a trend within each, and I highlighted around fire and life safety and precast concrete, which are integral in the build-out of both data centers and commercial and industrial infrastructure. As to the results, we've got a tremendous amount of talent at the leadership level. We feel great about that. They've taken actions to drive profit.

We do have slightly higher revenue growth, which enables a little more operating leverage. So I think you combine those two things, and that's what you see in the third quarter. We're excited about the business's long term. Quarter to quarter, there will be some variability, but we're glad to see that the results better reflect the feeling we have around the positioning of our businesses.

Okay. That's helpful. Then back to Simon, with regard to pricing on the property side of the equation, maybe you could share with us what your mix is in the insurance segment, meaning how much is short tail, how much is long tail? With regard to the pricing, what are you seeing on the property side of the equation?

Andrew, in terms of mix, it's certainly in the U.S., slanted towards longer tail. The property business is call it 30% of our Wholesale and Specialty division. The rest of that division is made up of casualty, professional, and then our binding line, which also includes some property in there. You want to talk about the rate environment, Simon?

Yeah. I suppose on the property bit, so if you take that 30%, which is the actual what we call property, and then you probably take an extra 10% of the 100 from binding in there or thereabout. So it's kind of 40% of the book overall. I would suggest that property this year is probably off 25%-30% in our book of businesses. It is competitive. It was interesting to see the storm season go through. We're not done with the storm season yet. We remember Sandy from 2011. So it's not over till it's over, but it's trending in a way where it's been very low catastrophe this year. So I would expect we go into a reinsurance renewal season with some very competitive terms being offered there, and that will lead to more competition as we go into next year.

It's been very, very significant and structured and layered large property placements. The competition now, I think, is trending towards smaller and medium-sized property business as well. So for sure, property does not have the margin that it did a few years ago. I don't think we're quite at the point where it's underwater yet. I still think there's profit to be made in that particular area, but we're getting pretty close. So one would hope and expect as we go through the course of 2027 for that market to kind of flatten out a little bit and then discipline to come back through. But I do think there's going to be some fairly major loss activity required in order to move that market substantively.

I do think it's beginning to flatten out because of the acceleration and the softening that we saw in the first half of the year. So it's a little bit less, but the storm season this year with the very few landfalls that we've seen in terms of hurricane activity, I can only imagine that we're going to have softer reinsurance, which will lead to softer conditions in the primary market.

Great color, Simon. If I could just sneak one last one in, just on Programs and Solutions, more specific in your businesses. What are the big pieces of Programs and Solutions? The underlying combined ratio was about 99%. Did that concern you at all? What was in that huge 12 points of favorable release?

I will start this off, and I am going to hand it over to Brian. Programs and Solutions, it is made up of five business units. It is Bermuda, it is a programs division that does the delegated underwriting. It is workers' comp and small commercial, Markel personal lines, and surety. So there are five businesses there that in total aggregate up to about just shy of $3 billion of premium per year. You asked about the 99% combined ratio. Actually, the one driver of that that we are looking at is in that delegated programs business. We have got two programs in there, which have caused us a real concern. I have mentioned the personal umbrella on previous calls. That has been something that we have been working hard at. We have taken very significant and deliberate action in that particular space.

I believe why the 99% isn't a major concern for me at the moment, I would like it to be lower, of course, is because of that action that has been taken, and we expect that to improve over the course of 2027. So it is one of those deliberate underwriting discipline actions that we took. I think you mentioned the second part of the question, I will give to Brian.

Yeah. On the prior year releases, kind of two themes there. One, workers' comp is in that unit. All of our workers' comp, which has some steady releases. The other piece is our Bermuda property also had some significant releases in the quarter.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Tom Gayner for any closing remarks.

I want to thank you all for joining us today. We have been delighted to report on our progress of serving our customers and relentlessly compounding the intrinsic value of Markel Group over the long term. Thank you for your ongoing support and interest, and we look forward to keeping you updated as we continue to build and grow your company. Thank you very much.

This conference call has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.

Markel Group (MKL) Q3 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Company Participants