Almost $20 trillion in revenue—and a record-breaking $1.87 trillion in profits. Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive list of the biggest companies in America.

Fortune 500

The 300 companies on this year’s list brought in over $12.6 trillion in revenue for the latest 12 months, with the median revenue figure at $22 billion.

America's Most Innovative Companies

Industries included in the sector are banks, insurance, and real estate companies.

Fortune Sector Leaders: Financials

The Fortune 500, in its 70th year in 2024, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

The 200 companies on this list are transforming industries from the inside out.

The 300 companies on this list are transforming industries from the inside out.

The Fortune 500, in its 69th year in 2023, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 68th running of the list.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 67th running of the list.

The insurance company is one of the largest home insurance providers in the U.S., and is the home and auto insurance provider for AARP members.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 66th running of the list.

F500-2020-160-Hartford-Financial-Services-Group

Better known as The Hartford, the insurance and financial services company was founded in 1810 and is headquartered in Hartford, Conn.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 65th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 64th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 63rd running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 62nd running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 61st running of the list. Wal-Mart claims the top spot again. See who made the list.

Global business is back. After limping through a worldwide financial crisis and economic slowdown, the 500 largest companies ranked by revenues shattered all sorts of performance records in 2013: They racked up combined revenues of $31.1 trillion, up 2.5% from 2012, and profits soared 27% to nearly $2 trillion. China’s 95 companies (up from 89 last year) posted $5.8 trillion in revenues. The U.S. has four fewer companies on the list than last year but remains (for now) the country leader, with 128 corporations on the list—including No. 1 Wal-Mart Stores—reporting $8.6 trillion in revenues. 

Fortune Global 500

Key Financials

Revenues ($M)

Profits ($M)

Assets ($M)

Sector

Culture rank

Process rank

Product rank

Years on list

Previous rank

Key Financials (last Fiscal Year)

Total Stockholder Equity ($M)

Profit Ratios

Profit as % of Revenues

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholder Equity

Earnings Per Share (last Fiscal Year)

Earnings Per Share ($)

EPS % Change (from prior fiscal year)

EPS % Change (5 year annual rate)

EPS % Change (10 year annual rate)

Total Return

Total Return to Investors (last year)

Total Return to Investors (5 year, annualized)

Total Return to Investors (10 year, annualized)

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Q4 2024

Get insights into Hartford Insurance Group including business profile, stock information, news, and rankings from Fortune.

Hartford Insurance Group (HIG): Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings

legacy

Hartford Insurance Group

hartford insurance group

Hello, and thank you for standing by. My name is Lacey, I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Second Quarter twenty twenty five The Hartford Insurance Group Financial Results Webcast. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers' remarks, there will be a question and answer session.

Thank you. I would now like to turn the call over to Kate Jorns, Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Head of Investor Relations. You may go ahead.

Good morning, and thank you for joining us today for our second quarter twenty twenty five earnings call and webcast. Yesterday, we reported results and posted all earnings related materials on our website. Before we begin, please note that our presentation includes forward looking statements, which are not guarantees of future performance and may differ materially from actual results. We do not assume any obligation to update these statements. Investors should consider the risks and uncertainties detailed in our recent SEC filings, news release and financial supplement, which are available on the Investor Relations section of thehartford.com.

Our commentary includes non GAAP financial measures with explanations and GAAP reconciliations available in our recent SEC filings, news release and financial supplement. Now I'd like to introduce our speakers, Chris Swift, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Beth Costello, Chief Financial Officer. After their remarks, we will take your questions assisted by several members of our management team. And now, I'll turn the call over to Chris.

Good morning and thank you for joining us today. The Hartford's second quarter results were outstanding with core earnings reaching nearly $1,000,000,000 This performance reflects the effectiveness of our strategy and consistency of execution that drives our momentum. We are expanding our market presence and growing with purpose. Our strategic investments are advancing innovation across the organization to benefit customers and distribution partners. We are pleased with our year to date performance as we have successfully capitalized on market opportunities while maintaining strong margins.

With that, let's take a closer look at second quarter performance. Highlights include top line growth in Business Insurance of 8% with an outstanding underlying combined ratio of 88% in Personal Insurance an underlying combined ratio of 88% with 8.7 points of improvement over prior year and exceptional core earnings margin of 9.2% in Employee Benefits and continued solid performance in our investment portfolio. All these items contributed to an outstanding trailing twelve month core earnings ROE of 17%. Turning to Business Insurance, results were excellent driven by industry leading underwriting tools, pricing expertise and data science advancements. Small Business delivered an excellent underlying combined ratio with record breaking quarterly net new business premium.

Strong written premium growth was fueled in part by double digit increases in auto and in our industry leading packaged product as well as a 35% increase in E and S binding premium. We are on a clear trajectory to exceed $6,000,000,000 in annual written premium in 2025. Growth in small is fueled by technology and data science advancements, which provide significant and unrivaled competitive advantages. For example, our best in class quoting platform is powered by intelligent automation, real time decisioning and proprietary pricing models differentiated by our rich historical data. Over the years, we have streamlined the submission process with intuitive workflows and advanced pre fill of customer data.

Our AI driven underwriting logic suggests coverages based on business type and reflects the judgment of our most experienced underwriters. All of this delivers a seamless and efficient experience, allowing 75% of all quotes across all admitted lines of business to be bound within minutes. This provides a durable competitive advantage for us with our distribution partners. As we continue to invest in AI, we expect bindability to increase further, driving enhanced efficiency, greater scalability and sustained profitable growth. Turning to Middle and Large business, underlying results were excellent with solid growth.

We are focused on maintaining margins and making appropriate risk decisions using enhanced underwriting tools. Middle and Large continues to advance the vision of an automated AI driven underwriting process to enhance productivity and accelerate speed to market. Our strategic investments leverage strengths in small business and extend those advantages to middle market. Over time, we believe this positions us well to capture additional market share in this space. Shifting to Global Specialty, results were outstanding with sustained underlying margins in the mid-80s and record quarterly gross written premium of $1,300,000,000 Our strong competitive position, broad product portfolio and disciplined renewal pricing drove this performance.

Gross written premium in the wholesale business grew 8% supported by growth in casualty, auto and inland marine. Global reinsurance gross written premium grew 15% driven by strong growth in both U. S. Property and specialty casualty lines. With a diverse product portfolio and a constructive pricing environment, we remain confident in the growth potential of Global Specialty.

As for pricing, business insurance renewal pricing excluding workers' compensation is strong at 8.1% and is still comfortably above the overall loss trend. Pricing execution remains highly disciplined with low double digit increases in auto and general liability including mid teens increases in umbrella and excess lines. In workers' compensation, although pricing is modestly down from the first quarter, it remains within expectations. Across business insurance, focused expansion in property has driven 12% growth with written premium of $1,000,000,000 in the quarter. In small business, property pricing within our packaged product remained strong as we achieved 15% renewal written price increases.

In general industries property, pricing is solid and above loss trends. Large property and wholesale pricing declined from the first quarter by four eight points respectively. However, both of these lines have adequate margins and account for less than 10% of total business insurance property. As we continue to grow the property book, we are maintaining a consistent catastrophe risk appetite and in another active cat quarter, our cat losses remain below our market share. Turning to personal insurance, results improved significantly over prior year.

Homeowners had an outstanding quarter highlighted by 17% written premium growth and low 70s underlying combined ratio. Renewal written pricing of 12.7% driven by net rate and insured value increases continue to support healthy margins and reinforces a strong position in the market.

Auto underlying results improved by 9.7 points to a mid-90s underlying combined ratio. We are now well positioned to profitably grow in both auto and home.

This month, we introduced our Prevail offering inclusive of auto, home and umbrella to the agency channel unlocking additional opportunities with preferred market customers. We expect to be in six states by the end of the year and an additional 15 to 20 states next year. Agents are energized by the enhanced efficiency of Prevail and have expressed strong commitment to promoting these improved offerings as new states come online. More broadly, agents and brokers at our annual summit in May conveyed a clear eagerness to deepen their partnership with us across the enterprise. They continue to recognize our ability to deliver fast, accurate solutions as a key differentiator in the market.

With our ongoing investments in AI, digital tools and overall ease of doing business, we are well positioned to grow alongside our distribution partners and strengthen our collaborative success. Moving on to employee benefits, core earnings margin of 9.2% was exceptional driven by excellent life and disability results. Persistency remained strong in the low 90s while fully insured premium growth was flat reflecting a competitive market. Looking ahead, we are particularly excited about our recent partnership with Naya, which brings AI powered personalization to benefits enrollment. This collaboration enhances digital capabilities and simplifies the benefits experience for employees through seamless integration with leading HR platforms.

Improving benefit utilization enhances employee satisfaction and in turn helps employers retain their workers. This is another example of how we are advancing our innovation strategy and delivering meaningful value to both employers and their employees. In summary, second quarter results reflect the strength of our businesses and the impact of ongoing strategic investments. It is an exciting time at The Hartford as we advance our innovation agenda. We are prioritizing practical, high impact AI applications that augment human talent and drive productivity to better serve customers and distribution partners.

Looking ahead, we are confident in our ability to capture additional market share, deliver profitable growth and capitalize on the opportunities ahead. Now, I'll turn the call over to Beth to provide more detailed commentary on the quarter.

Thank you, Chris. Core earnings for the quarter were $981,000,000 or $3.41 per diluted share with a trailing twelve month core earnings ROE of 17. In Business Insurance, core earnings were $697,000,000 with written premium growth of 8% and an underlying combined ratio of 88%. Small Business continues to deliver industry leading results with written premium growth of 9% and an underlying combined ratio of 89. Middle and Large Business had another quarter of strong profitability with an underlying combined ratio of 89.1 and written premium growth of 5%.

Global Specialty second quarter was outstanding with an underlying combined ratio of 84.8% and written premium growth of 9%. The business insurance expense ratio of 30.6% improved 0.5 points from second quarter twenty twenty four, primarily driven by the impact of higher earned premium. In personal insurance, core earnings for the quarter were $94,000,000 with an underlying combined ratio of 88. The auto underlying combined ratio of 95.2 improved 9.7 points from the 2024 period, and homeowners produced an excellent underlying combined ratio of 72.7, which improved 5.1 points. Written premium in personal insurance increased 7% in the second quarter in part driven by steady and successful rate actions.

We achieved written pricing increases of 14% in auto and 12.7% in homeowners. Additionally, new business growth continues to be robust in homeowners at 47% over the prior year. Homeowners policy count continued to grow, while auto decreased as expected. We continue to expect that auto policy count will pivot to growth in 2026. The personal insurance second quarter expense ratio of 25.1% improved from the prior year by 1.3 points, primarily driven by the impact of higher earned premium, partially offset by a higher commission ratio due to business mix.

With respect to catastrophes, P and C current accident year losses were $212,000,000 before tax or 4.9 combined ratio points, primarily related to tornado, wind, and hail events largely concentrated in the South And Midwest regions. As a reminder, we have a $200,000,000 aggregate catastrophe cover which attaches when subject losses and expenses exceed $750,000,000 Through June 30, losses subject to the treaty were approximately $690,000,000 leaving $60,000,000 before we reach the attachment point. The aggregate cover does not include losses from the global reinsurance business, which purchases its own retrocessional coverage. Total P and C net favorable prior accident year development within core earnings was $163,000,000 before tax, primarily due to reserve reductions in workers' compensation, catastrophes, bond, commercial property, and across personal insurance. We recorded $24,000,000 before tax of deferred gain amortization related to the Navigators ADC, which positively impacted net income with no impact on core earnings.

We expect the remaining balance of $8,000,000 to be amortized in the third quarter. Moving to employee benefits, we achieved core earnings of $163,000,000 for the quarter. The core earnings margin of 9.2% reflects excellent group life and disability performance. The group disability loss ratio of 68.5 increased 1.4 points from the prior year, driven by short term disability and a slight increase in long term disability incidents partially offset by strong claim recoveries. However, long term disability incidence rates continue to remain favorable to historical averages and to our expectations.

The group life loss ratio of 74.3 for the quarter improved 0.6 points reflecting lower mortality, primarily driven by the accidental death product. The employee benefits expense ratio of 25.7 increased 1.3 points compared with 24.4 in second quarter twenty twenty four, primarily due to higher technology costs and higher staffing costs. Fully insured ongoing sales in the quarter of $107,000,000 increased from $101,000,000 in second quarter twenty twenty four, reflecting higher group disability sales. Turning to investments. Net invested income of $664,000,000 increased from second quarter twenty twenty four, primarily driven by a higher level of invested assets and reinvesting at higher interest rates, partially offset by a lower yield on variable rate securities.

The total annualized portfolio yield, excluding limited partnerships, was 4.6% before tax, 20 basis points above first quarter twenty twenty five. We continue to strategically manage the portfolio, balancing risk while pursuing accretive trading opportunities, and in the quarter reinvested at 130 basis points above the sales and maturity yield. Our second quarter annualized LP returns of 1% before tax were down from first quarter. Returns have been muted due to market uncertainty stemming from a combination of interest rates and tariff policy, which has limited valuation and sale activity in our private equity and real estate portfolios. However, with stronger public equity performance in the second quarter, we expect limited partnership returns to improve in the second half of the year with full year 2025 returns modestly exceeding 2024.

Turning to capital management. Holding company resources totaled $1,300,000,000 at quarter end. During the quarter, we repurchased 3,200,000.0 shares under our share repurchase program for $400,000,000 and we expect to remain at that level of repurchases in the third quarter. As of June 30, we had $2,350,000,000 remaining on our share repurchase authorization through 12/31/2026. In summary, we are very pleased with our outstanding performance for the second quarter and believe we are well positioned to continue to enhance value for our stakeholders. I will now turn the call back to Kate.

Thank you, Beth. We will now take your questions. Operator, please repeat the instructions for asking a question.

Your first question comes from the line of Andrew Kligerman with TD Cowen. You may go ahead.

Hey, thank you and good morning everyone. I saw another impressive quarter with global specialty premium growth nine percent, combined was again under 90%. Could you remind me of the mix of in force business in Global Specialty? And coupled with that, where are you seeing the growth? Is it small, mid, large? And what product areas?

Andrew, thanks for joining us. I'll give you a high level and, yeah, Moe can maybe give you a little more details. But, yeah, it's a it's a broad based US and international organization. Right? The international organization is our syndicated Lloyd's that is focused primarily on casualty lines, energy, marine.

And then you get into The US, the major product lines are E and O, D and O, bond. There's some, you know, specialty, you know, in there like, you know, cyber and, you know,

EPLI. So it's it's it's quite, you know, diverse. And, yes, thanks for noticing how well it's been performing over the last couple of years. But Mo, would you add anything?

Also in that line Andrew is just short of $1,000,000,000 in our global reinsurance business, which is a good mixture of property and casualty globally. But the opportunity set in global specialty broadly, I think we are excited about the global re opportunity. We continue to be rather opportunistic in that space trying to grow when the market is there. And we feel the market in the reinsurance basis is fairly supportive. The wholesale space in there, again, we feel it's very supportive.

Think we've talked about in the past, we have a predominantly construction casualty book and we look to grow the other lines including property in the marine. So we feel good growth there. And then you push into markets like Lloyd's and there's good opportunity for there as we double down on the specialty areas we're in. And I think the last thing which I think is fairly unique to our specialty business is the idea that we are driving specialty products into our small and middle customer base. And that's a large part of the effort of that entire team is to make sure that we are selling every specialty product that we have to as many small and middle customers as we can.

That was very helpful. And maybe just shifting over to personal lines. I mean, was pretty much strong everywhere. But in personal lines, it sounds like you've kind of gotten to the profitability levels that you need. But I want to get a little clarity on when you want to grow.

I think, Chris, maybe in the opening remarks, it seemed like you're ready now, but then Beth kind of mentioned 2026. So when do you think you can really start growing in a meaningful way? And during this year, you expect in both auto and home to see double digit rate continue in the coming two quarters?

Yes. Andrew, I would say both Spats and I and Melinda and working with Mo, now is the time to grow in personal lines. We worked hard to sort of get back to target margins that we wanted in this book. Everyone else in the marketplace is pivoting to growth also. So there will be competitive dynamics.

But I think we have some differentiated capabilities both in auto and home, both in our direct channel, which is our primary business, but also as we roll out our new Prevail offering and package and technology to independent agents. So I think we're feeling good. You could see we're growing our home PIF count responsibly with good discipline and not taking on too much cat risk. I expect from a pure number side to be able to begin to add PIF count in 2026, just given sort of the competitive dynamics the rest of this year. If I forgot part of your question, Andrew, ask it again.

Yes. Just the rate. Do you think for the balance of the year, you'll still need double digit rate in auto and home?

Yes. I think what I would foreshadow is, yes, double digit rates in the third quarter in auto. We probably get to maybe high singles in the fourth quarter. And then home, just given sort of the inflationary pressures and insured value increases that we need to keep up with, yes, I would expect sort of low double digit spreads in home going forward.

Your next question comes from the line of Elyse Greenspan with Wells Fargo. You may go ahead.

Hi, thanks. Good morning. My first question is Business Insurance. Chris, at the start of the year, you laid out guidance for consistent margins for the year. Halfway through, we're looking right 30 basis points deceleration.

We can perhaps call that consistent. So I guess I just want to get a sense of where we sit halfway through the year and just if there's any changes to your full year guidance for the underlying combined ratio within business insurance?

Yes. Thank you, Elyse. I would say six months into this year, I'm pretty satisfied. The team's executing I think exceptionally well. We made a point of emphasis on trying to hold on to margins and keeping up with trend.

I think we've done that wonderfully. And I appreciate you of all people. Let's not quibble over 30 basis points. And I think we're pretty consistent with what are expected. And we still got six months to go to continue to perform strongly and maybe even outperform. So that's what I would share with you.

Thanks. And then my second question within employee benefits, which is on the life business. Can you just expand on what drove the strong results in the quarter? And I'm particularly interested just in more color on what you're seeing with mortality?

Yeah. I think Mike and I Mike Fish and I will tag team here. Yeah, I thought it was a strong quarter 9.2%. That's strong margins. Obviously, it's above our long term guidance principally driven by continued strong recoveries in LTD.

We put a little bit more rate into our leave book and some of our short term products that's contributing and life mortality is behaving very, very nicely for us. So put it all together, yeah, really pleased. I think the only thing we're focused on and it's self evident, so we may as well talk about it is our top line is a little flat. And I'll give you a perspective that I ultimately made the decision on was, if you look back sort of two years ago, really when we were pricing oneonetwenty five business, which is the big national account season, we probably in hindsight took a more conservative view on mortality trends, thought we were still going to be in endemic state and we were pretty disciplined and trying to get additional rate into the book. I think that had the consequences of suppressing our life sales particularly oneone.

Disability sales I think are holding up well. We're always going to be disciplined there just given how quickly morbidity trends could change on you in the multi year guarantees. But as I look at the second half of this year and into '26, I'm exceedingly optimistic about returning to a growth orientation. Mike, and I don't know if you would add anything to the color, but I am pretty optimistic that, I think we got our pricing where it needs to be, particularly post pandemic.

Right, Chris. I think you covered that really well. I would just add maybe a couple of things. In the quarter for life in particular for the loss ratio, right, and we called out AD and D was we just saw some unusually favorable experience in the quarter. So that ended up being a nice contribution to the loss ratio for the quarter.

And then as Chris noted, going forward, I think we're competing hard for the next six months certainly of this year to finish strong for 2025. And then as we turn the corner for the oneonetwenty six selling cycle, I feel really optimistic. We've got a great set of capabilities. We've invested quite a bit from a technology perspective on our offering whether it's on the absence and leave side or even digital capabilities for our life book. So again, feel good about what we're seeing in market right now and optimistic cautiously optimistic as I look forward over the next six to nine months.

Your next question comes from the line of Brian Meredith with UBS. You may go ahead.

Hey, thanks. Chris, I'm just curious, I wanted to talk a little bit about the commercial property markets. You all are seeing some good strong growth in that market. There's been a lot of discussion on calls already this quarter about big price decreases 10%, 15%. It doesn't necessarily mean it's unprofitable down 10%, 15.

But maybe you can talk a little bit about what you're seeing in that marketplace. Are you in different areas where maybe not seeing the level of competition and kind of the growth you're putting on there?

Yes, Brian, it's Chris. I'll start and then I'll ask Mo to add his insights. We're overall pleased where we are with our property book both from a growth side. I think you've seen we put up about 15% growth. Pricing, think in the aggregate I give you some numbers that might satisfy you.

I think ex Global Re for second quarter pricing was 6.8% compared to excuse me, 7.9% compared to 11.8% last quarter. And as you would expect, the large property market and the wholesale property market are primarily driving those decreases. If I look at Spectrum, our BOB product, the property component in there, that's up 14.7%. And our general industry properties is at 6.1%, which we think is keeping pace with loss cost trends. So I think the team is executing well.

Not all properties created equal. Our sort of small to midsize orientation, think, is holding up well. I think we're executing very strongly, Mo.

Yes, Brett. Just said the rates are generally holding up well. Yes, trending down, but still strong. As Chris talked about, I think in our core small and middle, I think we still see opportunity. We still see a solid starting point.

And as we talked about in the opening script, there is a bit of pressure, a bit of larger pressure in larger property in the wholesale lines where, again, the starting point is good, but we're watching those spaces closely.

Great. And then a follow-up question. I'm just curious, you're obviously a big admitted market, you also have some E and S type businesses. Maybe talk a little bit about the dynamics between those two. Are you seeing a little more appetite admitted versus E and S?

And then also on that topic, we've been hearing some complaints about some MGAs out there and kind of what's your perspective on that and using MGAs?

Yes. Brian, I wouldn't say that there's incredible flow back into the admitted space. We see it. But I think broadly our flow into our E and S offerings is strong. And as a reminder, we have the offering in small business, which is our binding space.

And then obviously, we have the wholesale brokerage in our Global Specialty segment. And the flows continue to be really strong. And I wouldn't say dramatically different than the past couple of quarters. So the and that's property and liability coming into the E and S space just in terms of submission volume. So we haven't seen a huge pivot back or that flow has changed.

And then the opportunity set, I think we still feel really good about. And our again, in both small business and the global specialty space, our ability to grow into those, we feel good about and are pretty broad based. I may have missed the second part of your question, Brian. It was in the summer

with MGAs and we've heard some complaints about MGAs.

Yes. There are some pockets of our business. It's not a major we don't feel the MGAs in the core admitted retail small and middle space, is obviously where we're at. We don't feel strongly there, but we do feel pockets in financial lines and some of the other specialty lines that are, I would agree with some of the other commentary that's out there. There is an overcapacity and there is some disruption that those MGAs are creating, but it's not a huge impact for us in the core space.

Your next question comes from the line of Mike Zaremski with BMO Capital Markets. You may go ahead.

Hey, great. Good morning. Back to the comments and disclosures on the investment portfolio, the annualized investment yield XLPs, the spread there versus the reinvestment yield, obviously, a very bullish kind of spread there. But I'm just curious, that annualized investment yield XLPs has kind of drifted in the mid fours for over a year now despite their reinvestment yield, you know, being meaningfully higher. So just wanna make sure, you know, I'm not missing something.

You know, over time, if the yield curve stays the same, the annualized investment yield XLPs kind of glide path up to that 5.9% range that's in the slide deck? Am I missing something? Because it's just a very healthy spread, much more so than your peers kind of for the investment yields to bypass up over time.

Mike, I'll let Beth add her commentary. I think what's important to know is we haven't changed philosophically our asset allocation models, model portfolio. We've seen duration being pretty consistent at four within the P and C business, five in group benefits. So I'll let Beth get into maybe any special securities that we're adding into the portfolio. But generally, it's steady as she goes and no major changes to our balance sheet philosophy.

Yes. The only thing I'll add Mike, as you think about the overall yield and comparing that is, as I referenced in my prepared remarks, we obviously have felt the impact of lower yield on variable rate securities. So that obviously puts a little bit of pressure on that overall yield to take that into consideration. And then we also sometimes have other investments, not LP investments that also can have a little bit of volatility that you can see quarter to quarter. But as Chris said, nothing significant that I would point to as a change in our philosophy or yield this quarter on our purchases being above the sales and maturity yield.

Some of that is also just the average life of the securities we purchased were a bit longer than the ones that we sold. So that impact a little bit as well. But again, as Chris said, wouldn't point to anything significant change overall.

Okay. Got it. A good point maybe on the floating rate is what I need to think through more. My follow-up, just pivoting to business insurance. In terms of policy count retention levels in small business and low market, just want to maybe don't think about this way, but is it fair to say that over long periods of time, you're kind of trying to hit a kind of a mid-80s versus the lower 80s today?

Or is that just not just depends on the environment and there's a lot you obviously give us new business sales and everything else. But is there anything we should be thinking about there in terms of their retention levels currently and how those could trend?

Mike, it's Mo. I would say it's a little bit different between small and middle. In small, you can see our numbers historically, the mid-80s. We do have a dynamic of which is different than the middle space where we have small businesses just going out of business. That's a higher impact in the small space.

But and we do feel a little bit more churn in the middle space. So we do expect an incrementally lower retention in the middle space. But I would say what you see in the IFS is pretty much on plan with where we want to be and I wouldn't expect anything dramatically different in the future.

Your next question comes from the line of Gregory Peters with Raymond James. You may go ahead.

Good morning, everyone. Chris, in your opening comments, you talked about data science advancements. I think with the small business, you referred to the usage of AI, leading to a 75% buying ratio within minutes. So, I I guess just when you talk about these things, know, would I does the 75% rep the final destination, Or is this some sort of is there some sort of aspirational target in the background you're thinking about? Or maybe perhaps you're thinking about using this technology and spilling it over into your middle market business? Just some more color on the technology comments, please.

Yeah. I think the last point you made is the key point I would share is that small has led the way in a lot of innovation, whether it be, you want to call it AI, automation, speed, accuracy, using our rich data sets. And we're we are working on emulating that in middle market in certain aspects of global specialty. So that is the playbook. I would say beyond 75%, look, I could be flippant and just put out 100% would be a good number too.

But I think it's realistic that there always will be some deviation that will require human intervention, particularly as maybe you go up from a larger scale and a larger account side in small. But again, pleased where we're at. Obviously, it's a key differentiator. And just know, we're committed to leading the way in AI, particularly as we think about underwriting claims and overall operations. But Mo, what would you add?

I'll just add it from an underwriting perspective. In the space that we compete in the small and middle space, speed really, really matters to get an efficient answer back to our agents. So we are finding that the speed that we've accomplished in small, that 75% of everything we quote, and getting that closer to 90% over time is a hugely competitive space to be in just because that time is real money because people are just trying to get through submissions and maintain the margins that are hard to get in the small space. And again, we think that speed is equally as important into the middle space. So we think this is a competitive advantage in both segments today that we'll look to grow in the future.

Okay. Thanks for the clarification there. I know the adverse cover, you used all of it as relates to the annual reserve review in the asbestos. And I tried to shy away from modeling questions, but it seems appropriate, you know, given that you're going to have a year end review. And maybe it might be appropriate for you to revisit how you want us to or how you would like to frame up, you know, the reserve review as we go into the second half of the year and what we should be thinking about in our models.

I'm I'm gonna refrain from exact guidance, but I I I say a couple of points. Obviously, the bookkeeping that we do on any ADC that we begin to get recoveries from, which goes through net income as opposed to core. So the toggle between core and net income on some of these runoff blocks, I think will be important. We're not projecting. We have not given you a timeframe when we expect any recoveries on the A and E ADC, but they will come at some point in the future.

And I would say without knowing the data in this year's study, I suspect we're not going to see anything dramatically different than we've experienced in the past. There's still lawyers out there that are pressing for higher settlements. There's still environmental exposures. There's talc. There's mesothelioma that is still happening in the marketplace.

So I don't know what to say, Greg, other than I don't see a lot of change.

Your next question comes from the line of Alex Scott with Barclays. You may go ahead.

Hey, good morning. What I had was on small business. I guess the underlying combined ratio, while still very good at 89, it went up 2.2 points while the middle and large improved by half a point. I guess that was just maybe directionally a little different than I would have guessed given I think the small business pricing is more definitively in excess of loss cost trend versus middle and large at this point. So any help you can provide us in just thinking through like the year over year in those areas of business insurance?

Yes. I'll start and Mil can add. I think it's pretty simple. Last year I think in small we experienced a real non cat weather benefit that didn't reoccur this year. And if I look at our sort of actual results to assumptions on property, we're right on expectations of where we are maybe two tenths ahead with non weather cat benefit.

But I think it's just a compare and both middle and small I think are performing really well with our property books.

Yeah. Actually we're right on expectations in terms of where we want to be.

Yes. Understood. It was more of the comps. Second question I have on workers' comp. I just wanted to get a feel for how things are trending there, if there's any kind of impact embedded California and hopefully we'll get some relief from that as the pricing comes in next year.

So I'm just trying to understand if that has been a headwind sort of embedded in business insurance that I should think through. And just also like if I think the comments on pricing ex workers' comp were that they were comfortably ahead of loss trend. But just wondering if you can say the same including workers' comp.

Well, I think we always exclude workers' comp because it's sort of its own ecosystem and its own dynamics. I would just clarify, California is actually a very good state for us comp wise. So you should not be thinking of California as a problem for our book in California. California again is unique in a lot of ways, but our book is performing exceedingly well there. I think the trends that I spoke to first to second quarter is pricing only.

And we have not changed our loss picks in any of our product lines compared to where we thought we would be. So as much as pricing deviates maybe a little bit in comp here, it hasn't affected our pick. So first quarter, we talked about all in sort of pricing up zero three of a point. That probably turned negative this quarter in about zero five point range. But again unaffected any reported results because we have a we made prudent overall loss picks and assumptions that are still holding.

So that's the only additional data point I would give to you. But I'll look to Mo and say anything else you want to share with Alex.

Hartford Insurance Group Q2 2025 Earnings Call Transcript | Fortune

Companies

John Kell

e.l.f. Beauty’s CDIO says she’s responsible for AI’s foundation, but that these tools aren’t an IT mandate

/2025/09/10/e-l-f-beautys-cdio-says-shes-responsible-for-ais-foundation-but-that-these-tools-arent-an-it-mandate/

Phil Wahba

Why Walmart’s U.S. CEO says staffing levels will remain steady even as A.I. becomes a bigger part of work

/2025/09/09/walmart-ai-jobs-brainstorm-tech/

Jessica Mathews

DoorDash CEO Tony Xu says path to autonomous deliveries filled with ‘lots of pain and suffering’ but company is nearing first inning of commercial progress

/2025/09/08/doordash-ceo-tony-xu-interview-brainstorm-tech-autonomous-drone-deliveries/

Indrani Sen

Fortune Archives: Warren Buffett’s biggest blunder

/2025/09/07/fortune-archives-warren-buffetts-biggest-blunder/

Fortune Editors

Fortune 500 Power Moves: Which executives gained and lost power, Aug. 23-Sept. 5, 2025

/2025/09/05/fortune-500-power-moves-aug-23-sept-5/

Nino Paoli

Davenport, Florida, Starbucks Coffee, outside exterior drive thru through.

Hartford Insurance Group (HIG) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Company Participants