With a combined revenue of $21 trillion and $2.1 trillion in profits, the 2026 Fortune 500 is the definitive list of America's largest companies.

Fortune 500

Almost $20 trillion in revenue—and a record-breaking $1.87 trillion in profits. Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive list of the biggest companies in America.

Energy sector dominated this year for the first time since 2008, with 28 companies featured on the list.

100 Fastest-Growing Companies

Industries included in the sector are mining, oil and gas exploration and services, pipelines, refining, and utilities.

Fortune Sector Leaders: Energy

The Fortune 500, in its 70th year in 2024, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

The Fortune 500, in its 69th year in 2023, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 68th running of the list.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 67th running of the list.

F500 2021-211-Halliburton

Operating in over 70 countries with more than 40,000 employees worldwide, Halliburton is one of the world's largest oilfield services companies. The 102-year-old company dropped 69 spots on the Fortune 500 list after reporting a 36% drop in sales and a loss of nearly $3 billion for 2020.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 66th running of the list.

F500-2020-142-Halliburton

The world's second-largest oilfield services company.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 65th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 64th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 63rd running of the list.

This year's Fortune Global 500 generated $27.6 trillion in revenues and $1.5 trillion in profits.

Fortune Global 500

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 62nd running of the list.

The world's 500 largest companies generated $31.2 trillion in revenues and $1.7 trillion in profits in 2014. Together, this year's Fortune Global 500 employ 65 million people worldwide and are represented by 36 countries.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 61st running of the list. Wal-Mart claims the top spot again. See who made the list.

Global business is back. After limping through a worldwide financial crisis and economic slowdown, the 500 largest companies ranked by revenues shattered all sorts of performance records in 2013: They racked up combined revenues of $31.1 trillion, up 2.5% from 2012, and profits soared 27% to nearly $2 trillion. China’s 95 companies (up from 89 last year) posted $5.8 trillion in revenues. The U.S. has four fewer companies on the list than last year but remains (for now) the country leader, with 128 corporations on the list—including No. 1 Wal-Mart Stores—reporting $8.6 trillion in revenues. 

Wal-Mart stayed on top as its sales crept closer to half-a-trillion dollars. Apple moved into the top five. And UnitedHealth Group continued its steady climb. 

Key Financials (last Fiscal Year)

Revenues ($M)

Profits ($M)

Assets ($M)

Total Stockholder Equity ($M)

Profit Ratios

Profit as % of Revenues

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholder Equity

Fastest-growing Companies

Revenue 3 Yr Growth Rank

Revenue 3 Yr Annual Growth Rate

EPS 3 Yr Growth Rank

EPS 3 Yr Annual Growth Rate

Total Return 3 Yr Rank

Total Return 3 Yr Annual Rate

Beat S&P 500 3 Yr Return

Current Streak

Years on List

Sector

Earnings Per Share (last Fiscal Year)

Earnings Per Share ($)

EPS % Change (from prior fiscal year)

EPS % Change (5 year annual rate)

EPS % Change (10 year annual rate)

Total Return

Total Return to Investors (last year)

Total Return to Investors (5 year, annualized)

Total Return to Investors (10 year, annualized)

Founded in 1919 by Erle P. Halliburton, a pioneer in oil well cementing, Halliburton is a global provider of products and services to the energy industry. Halliburton is considered one of the big three global oilfield services firms along with SLB and Baker Hughes. It operates through two main segments: completion and production, and drilling and evaluation. The completion and production segment specializes in production enhancement, cementing, sand control, and well intervention services, while the drilling and evaluation segment focuses on drilling fluid systems, directional drilling, wireline and perforating, and advanced digital solutions. Halliburton is widely viewed as the U.S. leader in hydraulic fracturing completions, better known as fracking. Halliburton’s technological innovations include achieving the world’s first closed-loop, autonomous fracturing operation, and pioneering AI tools that optimize exploration, drilling, and production workflows. Its DS365.ai platform enables data management, scalable AI/ML model deployment, and app development.

Q2 2026

Q1 2026

Q4 2025

Q3 2025

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Q4 2024

Halliburton (HAL): Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings

legacy

Halliburton

halliburton

Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Halliburton Second Quarter twenty twenty five Company Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen only mode. After the speakers' presentation, there will be a question and answer session. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. David Coleman. Sir, please begin.

Hello, and thank you for joining the Halliburton second quarter twenty twenty five conference call. We will make the recording of today's webcast available for seven days on Halliburton's website after this call. Joining me today are Jeff Miller, Chairman, President and CEO and Eric Carre, Executive Vice President and CFO. Some of today's comments may include forward looking statements that reflect Halliburton's views about future events. These matters involve risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to materially differ from our forward looking statements.

These risks are discussed in Halliburton's Form 10 ks for the year ended 12/31/2024, Form 10 Q for the quarter ended 03/31/2025, recent current reports on Form eight ks and other Securities and Exchange Commission filings. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward looking statements for any reason. Our comments today also include non GAAP financial measures. Additional details and reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are included in our second quarter earnings release and in the Quarterly Results and Presentations section of our website. Now, I'll turn the call over to Jeff.

Thank you, David, and good morning, everyone. I will open today's call with a discussion of the oilfield services market, which appears very different today than it did only ninety days ago. In the second quarter, commodity markets were volatile driven by trade and tariff uncertainty, geopolitical unrest, and the accelerated return of OPEC plus production cuts. Against this backdrop, here's what I observe in the market today, which directly influences my outlook. In North America, multiple operators, even large and established customers, are now planning meaningful schedule gaps in the second half of twenty twenty five.

In international markets, particularly among some large NOCs, we continue to see reductions in activity and lower discretionary spend typical of much lower commodity price environments. And finally, we've seen several well publicized reorganizations and cost reduction efforts by large independent operators and IOCs. To put it plainly, what I see tells me the oilfield services market will be softer than I previously expected over the short to medium term. We will, of course, take action to address this near term softness. That said, I believe the demand fundamentals remain strong for both oil and gas.

I expect conditions will improve as additional OPEC plus production is absorbed by the market and operators around the world work to replace declining production and meet increasing demand. As I look ahead, I believe that Halliburton is well aligned with the themes that I expect will define the next several years. First, unconventionals will continue to be a critical component of the supply picture. I expect that advanced technology to maximize recovery and returns will expand both in The United States and around the world. Second, production related services like intervention and stimulation along with artificial lift will grow alongside increased global production of both oil and gas.

Third, I expect demand will rise for complex drilling and well construction services to access available resources. This requires advanced tools and automation technologies for efficient development and delivery. I believe our strategic alignment with these themes positions Halliburton to deliver industry leading returns. I fully expect that the strategic execution that delivered performance in recent markets will continue to deliver outperformance in the future. Now let's move on to our geographic results.

I'll start with the international markets, where Halliburton delivered quarterly revenue of $3,300,000,000 The second quarter demonstrated 2% sequential growth with activity increases in Latin America and Europe Africa offset by activity reduction in Saudi Arabia. As we look at the full year 2025, I expect our international revenue will contract by mid single digits year on year, primarily driven by activity reductions in Saudi Arabia and Mexico. Despite the ongoing softness in these large markets, I do expect Halliburton to demonstrate growth in Brazil and Norway, as well as offshore frontier basins where we secured key wins last quarter through our technology, operational excellence, and collaborative approach. Thinking broadly about our international business going forward, our growth engines, unconventionals, drilling, production services, and artificial lift remain key to our international strategy, and we believe Halliburton has unique opportunities to grow in each of these areas as evidenced by our recent progress. In unconventionals, we continue to see adoption of North America style development, multi well pads, long laterals, and large completions in several international unconventional basins, which reinforces our confidence in our unique ability to lead in unconventionals.

In Argentina, we achieved a record quarterly stage count and performed our first sensory fiber optic fracture monitoring service, a milestone in expanding our leading unconventional technologies outside of North America. In Australia, we recently completed a 67 stage stimulation, the largest job to date in the Bidiloo Basin. And in The Middle East, we drilled the longest well in the region's largest unconventional play. Turning to drilling services. ICruise, Logix Automation, and the iStar platform delivered strong performance and introduced unique capabilities in several technically demanding markets.

Globally, we surpassed half a million feet drilled with Logix closed loop automation and completed an important trial with a customer in The Middle East. In Norway, we recently utilized iCruise and Logix to drill the longest well in the Norwegian continental shelf to a measured depth of over 10 kilometers. In reservoir mapping, we launched EarthStar three d x. It builds on our leading EarthStar x and BrightStar mapping technologies and provides a three-dimensional map ahead of the bit while drilling. This unique capability allows proactive steering around hazards and precision wellbore placement for optimum drilling efficiency and recovery.

Next, in Production Services, we had several activity highlights during the second quarter. In Brazil, we began operations on our largest integrated well intervention contract, which highlights the expansion of our collaborative model from well construction to production. In Norway, we expanded our riserless coil tubing services beyond our initial pilot and completed a three well intervention campaign for a customer. Finally, in artificial lift, Halliburton secured its largest international ESP contract to date from a Middle East NOC. Middle East Asia remains our largest and fastest growing international lift region, with strong year over year growth also achieved in Latin America and Europe Africa.

We expect international artificial lift revenue to grow over 20% this year and plan to double the installed base of Intellivate, our remote operations and automation platform. It has been a strong start to the year, and I expect to exit the year with an international franchise that is larger than all of Summit at the time of acquisition, a significant milestone in our growth journey. To conclude my thoughts on the international market, while activity reductions in a few large markets will likely overshadow the solid performance of other geographies, I am confident our strategy is the right one and our growth engines remain key to that strategy. Now let's turn to North America, where our second quarter revenue of 2,300,000,000 was roughly flat to first quarter. Seasonal improvements in completions were offset by lower service pricing and reduced artificial lift activity.

As we look at the remainder of the year in North America, we expect that revenue in the second half will decline due to lower drilling and completion activity. This comes in the form of more white space in our frac calendars, the full period effects of recent service pricing reductions, and the stacking of frac fleets that do not meet our returns threshold. While increases in gas activity are likely to absorb some service capacity this year, it is unlikely to offset the decreases in oil directed activity. We now forecast full year North America revenue to decline low double digits year over year. In this environment, differentiation has never mattered more.

Halliburton's leading technology remains an important differentiator for us. This quarter, we were pleased to see Chevron announce their Zoos IQ closed loop fracturing milestone in The Rockies. Customer enthusiasm is strong and we are actively deploying Zeus IQ across our U. S. Operations.

I expect up to one third of our Zeus electric fleets to operate with Zeus IQ by year end, a strong endorsement of a technology that debuted only a quarter ago. In North America drilling, iCruise and Logix automation enable our customers to maximize the value of their assets by consistently delivering curve and lateral sections on today's longer wells. This performance has driven rapid growth in our U. S. Land rotary steerable business and double digit revenue growth in North America drilling services even amid rig count declines.

To finish my thoughts on North America, activity reductions will affect the oilfield services market this year. I am confident in our plans to take the necessary actions to address these headwinds. My customer conversations tell me technology and service execution are key to maximizing the value of their assets, and I believe Halliburton has unmatched capability to deliver both of these at scale, which is why I am confident we will deliver returns in North America that outpace our competitors. For both the international and North America markets, here's how I plan to address the near term softness. First, we will not work equipment where it does not earn economic returns, and this includes North America frac fleets.

Second, we will reduce our variable and fixed cash costs over the quarters ahead to size our business to the market we see. And finally, we will remain focused on free cash flow and returns and will remain diligent stewards of capital. Before I turn it over to Eric, let me close with this. I am confident in Halliburton's future. Today, we are more differentiated with deeper technology advantages to address our customers' requirements and more collaborative than ever before.

I believe our value proposition to collaborate and engineer solutions to maximize asset value for our customers is a powerful driver of both customer and shareholder value. With that, I'll turn the call over to Eric to provide more details on our financial results. Eric?

Thank you, Jeff, and good morning. Our Q2 reported net income per diluted share was $0.55 Total company revenue for Q2 twenty twenty five was $5,500,000,000 an increase of 2% when compared to Q1 twenty twenty five. Operating income was $727,000,000 and operating margin was 13%. Our Q2 cash flow from operations was $896,000,000 and free cash flow was $582,000,000 During Q2, we repurchased approximately $250,000,000 of our common stock. Now turning to the segment results.

Beginning with our Completion and Production division, revenue in Q2 was $3,200,000,000 an increase of 2% when compared to Q1 twenty twenty five. Operating income was $513,000,000 a decrease of 3% when compared to Q1 twenty twenty five and operating income margin was 16%. Revenue increased largely due to seasonal improvement in pressure pumping activity in the Western Hemisphere. The decline in operating income was primarily driven by lower pricing for stimulation services in U. S.

Land. In our Drilling and Evaluation division, revenue in Q2 was $2,300,000,000 an increase of 2% when compared to Q1 twenty twenty five. Operating income was $312,000,000 a decrease of 11% when compared to Q1 twenty twenty five and operating income margin was 13%. Revenue increased due to higher drilling related services globally. Operating income decreased due to seasonal roll off of software sales and increased startup and mobilization costs across multiple product service lines.

Now let's move on to geographic results. Our Q2 international revenue increased 2% sequentially. Europe Africa revenue in Q2 was $820,000,000 an increase of 6% sequentially. This increase was primarily driven by higher activity across multiple product service lines in Norway. Middle East Asia revenue in Q2 was $1,500,000,000 a decrease of 4% sequentially.

This decrease was primarily due to lower activity across multiple product service lines in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Latin America revenue in Q2 was $977,000,000 a 9% increase sequentially. This increase was primarily due to improved activity across multiple product service lines in Mexico and Brazil and increased well intervention services in Argentina. In North America, Q2 revenue was $2,300,000,000 relatively flat when compared to Q1 twenty twenty five. Slightly higher well construction activity, completion tool sales and stimulation activity in the region were offset by lower artificial lift activity and software sales.

Moving on to other items, in Q2, our corporate and other expense was $66,000,000 We expect our Q3 corporate expenses to increase by about $5,000,000 In Q2, we spent $32,000,000 on SAP Sfour migration, which is included in our results. For Q3, we expect SAP expenses to be about flat. Net interest expense for the quarter was $92,000,000 For Q3, we expect net interest expense to be approximately flat. Other net expense for Q2 was $24,000,000 for Q3, we expect this expense to be about $45,000,000 Our effective tax rate for Q2 was 21.4%. Based on our anticipated geographic earnings mix, we expect our Q3 effective tax rate to be approximately 23.5%.

Capital expenditures for Q2 were $354,000,000 For the full year 2025, we expect capital expenditures to be about 6% of revenue. In Q2, tariffs impacted our business by $27,000,000 For Q3, we currently expect a negative impact of about $35,000,000 or about $04 per share, which is included in our guidance. Now let me provide you with comments on our Q3 expectations. In our Completion and Production division, we anticipate sequential revenue to decrease 1% to 3% and margins to decrease 150 to 200 basis points. In our Drilling and Evaluation division, we expect sequential revenue to also decline 1% to 3% and margins to improve 125 to 175 basis points. I will now turn the call back to Jeff.

Thanks, Eric. Let me summarize the key takeaways from today's discussion. First, we are aligning our business with the current market conditions. We will reduce costs and retire, stack, or reallocate underperforming assets. Next, internationally, we see strong performance in our growth engines, unconventionals, drilling, production services, and artificial lift.

We secured key wins last quarter through our technology, operational excellence and collaborative approach. In North America, the ZEUS platform and iCruise continue Halliburton by delivering unique value to our customers. Combined with our ability to execute at scale, they reinforce our position as the leading services company. And finally, we remain focused on returns, capital discipline, and free cash flow. And now let's open it up for questions.

Ladies and gentlemen, if you have a question or comment at this time, please press star one one on your telephone keypad. Our Our first question or comment comes from the line of Neil Mehta from Goldman Sachs. Your line is open sir.

Yes, morning Jeff and team. The first question was really just morning, sir, is around C and P margins. They were a little softer in the quarter and we appreciated the Q3 volume Q3 guide. But can you just unpack that a little bit more? What are you seeing that's contributing to that?

And how do we get that moving back in the right direction?

Neil, it's Eric. So let me I'll give you a couple of colors on the C and P margins versus what we guided for Q2. And then I'll give a little more color around the Q3 guide for Q3. So starting with Q2, we actually were kind of on guidance in terms of revenue margins was a bit lower than the guidance on flat. We are I think 80 bps below the guide.

So what really happened in terms of the revenue side, we were up in most region and most product lines across the C and P division with two major exception, one Saudi and also the artificial lift business in North America. The reduction in Saudi is actually a reduction in frac, but also on the related services as a lot of the frac in Jafura was slowed down ahead of the award of the new tender. The other element that contributed to softer margins are obviously the pricing headwinds in U. S. Land and also the reduction in the Saudi activity I talked about.

Some of that was offset by the performance of our cementing and completion tool product lines, but overall it resulted in a slight miss from a margin perspective. So that's the color on the performance versus the Q2 guide. Now, if we move to Q3, so our guidance is 1% to 3% reduction in revenue and 150 basis to 200 basis basis points reduction in margin. There are really three main elements that contribute to the guidance. The first one is the reduction of activity and reduction or softness in pricing in North America land pressure pumping, which is both frac and also cementing.

The second element is the reduction of completion tool deliveries in most international market, partially offset by increase in completion deliveries in the Gulf Of America. And these are essentially just operation the cycle of drilling versus completion, etcetera. And the third element, which is the one I mentioned that affected also Q2 is a reduction in activity of frac in Saudi.

Yes. Thanks, Eric. And so maybe Jeff for you, the question is just can you help us walk through your customer conversations about the white space as you think about the back half of the year in North America for the frac side of the business and any early thoughts in 2026? I know it's a really volatile macro, but you probably have some great perspective as you talk to your most important customers.

Yes, certainly. I think that conserving cash, look and we see that there's, as I mentioned in my prepared remarks, quite a bit of reorganization and activity going on around that. And so I would say customers are fairly cautious in conserving budget. They also say though that, you know, the most important thing is technology and service quality performance, which, you know, is certainly good for Halliburton, and, you know, we will probably talk more about it, but sort of the technology steps we've taken have been important. And so, as I look out to '26, it's really early with the volatility that we see and

what precisely they're going to do for 2026 is sort of on hold. But what I would expect is that we would see activities earlier in the year pick up above what it is in certainly Q3 and Q4. But as far as sort of doubling down, I think that I don't see that happening soon until we see some catalysts that change trajectory on sort of price outlook.

Thank you. Our next question or comment comes from the line of Dave Anderson from Barclays. Mr. Anderson, your line is open.

Hey, good morning. Thank you for the question. I'm just kind of curious, Jeff, where are we right now in terms of these E and Ps resetting their programs? You talked about some meaningful schedule gaps coming up. I'm just kind of curious, we've seen a pretty steady decline in oil recount in last few months.

Do we be thinking about kind of a 4Q bottom? And then related to that, if you could give us maybe a little bit more color on pricing. I know at the end of last year, concessions were made to fleets contracted. The situation today, I'm curious, are they coming back for another bite of the apple? And sounds like you've walked away from some work.

I'm curious, does that mean you're getting rid of the final diesel fleets? Sorry, I threw a lot into that first question. Yeah.

Fair enough. Couple questions in there, Dave. All good questions. So let me just start with outlook on where are we in sort of the cycle or where are we relative to a bottom. And I really think we have to look at the supply and demand fundamentals here.

And we project and I think broadly as projected, there's solid growth in oil demand, but we also have spare capacity coming into the market and sort of The U. S. Producing at a fairly high level. And so I think as supply consumes, excuse me, as demand starts to consume spare capacity, we also start to see sort of production rollover in some key markets, which it likely will. I mean, decline curve is still working.

I think those are the signposts we look for in terms of where do we things come, you know, where do we see sort of a bottom versus a recovery. What I do know though is that, you know, it becomes a question of duration and sort of depth. And so if it comes off hard, it comes back on pretty hard pretty quickly So we need to look for those signposts. But seeing that we're below maintenance level today in North America, certainly below maintenance level in Mexico and a few other key markets around the world.

So I think we're from a trajectory standpoint that recovers. From a price standpoint, yes, I mean, at a place where I would describe it as we get to make choice. And so we are making choice around equipment working or not working, and we'll clearly stack some fleets just because, it just we're not going to work at uneconomic levels. And it's a commitment, it's strategic for us and it takes some equipment out of the market as well. But from our perspective, working at you know, uneconomic levels is literally burns up equipment, creates HSE risk and all sorts of things that we just don't wanna do.

And so so so that's those are steps we're taking now broadly, you know, from a anyway, I'll stop there. That's that's kinda where we are.

No. That makes sense. That makes sense, Jeff. Maybe if we can shift it to international markets.

You you had mentioned the unconventional the number of times. Argentina, Australia and obviously Saudi, which is the big one we're all kind of watching here. I was wondering if you could give us a sense as to kind of how big this now right now is in your international portfolio and how big it could actually be in a couple of years? Just trying to get a sense. Is it like 10% of international revenue at this point?

Like, kind of where does it go from here? Just a little bit of relative sense here in terms of the opportunity. Thank you.

Yeah. Let's look, I think there's opportunity in certainly Argentina as you described, also Saudi Arabia, but it's well beyond that in terms of sort of a trajectory. And like all things, it starts slowly and then gains gains legs, which I would how I would describe probably Argentina more so just because it was sort of a broad group of customers all investing in a market, and it got a lot of legs. And, now today, that is a meaningful market, a very meaningful market, and a technology driven market. You know, I think that, we expect growth beyond just those two countries.

And I think that's what's important as we go forward. We've seen pretty solid growth year on year, I would say double digits growth year on year with our international frac business, non U. S. Frac business. That's why I described Australia, I'll describe The UAE where we see quite a bit of opportunity and then also most of North Africa actually presents pretty good opportunities for unconventionals and also having the markets.

And yes, and I think and gas demand is going to drive in a number of these markets, you're going to see unconventionals driven more by gas demand than anything else.

Thank you. Our next question or comment comes from the line of Arun Jayaram from JPMorgan. Your line is open, sir.

Good morning, Jeff, Eric. Wanted to maybe Good morning. Wanted to see if you could maybe elaborate on that commentary on unconventionals. And wondering if we could focus on The Middle East. I know I cover EOG and they'll be testing an unconventional play concept in The UAE.

And perhaps, wanted to see if you could comment on how HAL is positioned in the upcoming Jafurah tender. I know that that tender will include, call it, a tripling of the amount of stages. So it's a large tender. Jeff, how important do you think technology will be within that tender? And when do you expect to see activity kind of rebound in Saudi?

Yeah. Look, I'm from an unconventional perspective, we're well positioned in The Middle East for unconventionals, both from an equipment standpoint and technically. And we have work starting q four ish in UAE, and we're happy with that. And that'll be, you know, a technology showcase I expect in terms of what we can do with Zoos IQ and some other things. You know, I I'm not gonna comment on Jafurra other than to say, you know, it's in process now.

It's we've got a very disciplined approach to bidding work, and I think that's what needs to be remembered here. And we're centered on that whole process is centered around returns and long term returns, not just volumes. And and I think we know quite a bit about this how to price frac, etcetera. And so from that perspective, look, by the time we're talking about name tenders on calls and things of that nature, you can bet they've gotten pretty competitive. But that said, we do like the frac work we're doing internationally and I really like the interest in the technology beyond interest actually buying the technology in Argentina, for example, that we're able to do with how to place fracs, where the sand is going, how to improve recovery.

Great. Jeff, my follow-up is just on the portfolio. I know in the last 10 Q, commented on the focus on Halliburton maybe to market a portion of its chemicals business, but just thoughts on pruning of the portfolio.

Look, we want to be investing in the thing we are investing in the things that we believe show the best returns for us and the best sort of opportunity for growth and returns. And so we do, we print the portfolio from time to time. We really like what we're doing with Lyft. And we think that ESP lift in particular is the most attractive certainly for us. And as we look at other parts of our portfolio where we don't see necessarily, we don't see opportunity for the kind of accretive returns that we would like, we take a hard look at it.

Thank you. Our next question or comment comes from the line of Roger Read from Wells Fargo Securities. Your line is open, sir.

Coming back to the, let's just call it, the North American outlook here that I recognize, a lot of things are kind of going against us here in terms of rig count, frac count, all that. We did get some tax reform with the big, better bill, or big, beautiful bill, whatever the heck, BBB. And we've heard a number of the E and P companies talk about it will be favorable to their free cash flow. So when we think about your outlook as it is today, kind of through year end, and then we think about maybe commodity prices hold flatter and some of these guys have a little more cash, what's sort of in the risk profile of your outlook? In other words, is that something that could help meaningfully?

Or do you feel, hey, visibility is actually pretty solid here and we got a good view into year end of significant softness?

I don't think the big beautiful bill necessarily factors into the plans in terms of what customers do. I think that's going to be quite a bit more sort of budget and commodity driven and returns driven for them. But when I look at the market, we have a fantastic group of customers and really good customers. And they are serious about this work, got good strategies and if there's white space appearing, it's to manage budget, the plan for 2026 is far from set for them at this point. But they're the kind of customers that we know will be active in this market.

And so, when we see white space like this, in some cases, we will stack for a short time and then come back or we will reallocate things in a way that we think is best from a returns perspective or we will in some cases make the determination to stack and keep something stacked. So I think that from an activity set, we really need to watch supply and demand and as I said, those signposts around what does production overall do in North America, I think will be a key driver in terms of what twenty twenty six looks like.

Yes, that makes sense. And then in terms of your comments about not wanting to chase uneconomic work, Historically, this has been a sector that sometimes gets more market share rather than, let's call it, returns or margin focused. That we should think it's a little different this time. You are going to be focused on maintaining, call it margins and returns as opposed to a market share fight?

Look, we are strategically, we're about maximizing value returns in North America, and that includes not working at uneconomic rates. And so this is exactly what we did a year ago in the gas markets and something we will continue to do. I mean, the fact is we want good equipment when it snaps back. We wanna make money with the equipment, and that's just the the approach we're going to take. We've taken it before, so it should not be, you know, it's not something we're gonna do. It's something we've done, and we'll certainly do again.

Thank you. Our next question or comment comes from the line of Saurabh Pont from Bank of America. Mr. Pont, your line is open.

Or Eric, maybe maybe I want to spend a little time on the cost side of things. I know you have worked hard to variabilize your cost structure in North America, and Jeff, did speak to reducing your variable and fixed cost, right, but how should we think about what kind of level of activity that you would be using to frame what you think you can take out of your cost structure or put differently, how should we think about protecting margins, maybe overall, maybe D and E and C and P, however you want to talk about that?

Yeah, look, we are looking at a market where we want to take action around variable costs clearly. It's not a perfect science, but as activity slows down, we want to take equipment and cost out of the market. Not a perfect science, but we've seen some moves in the market that cause us to do that. So that's one half of the equation. When I get to the other half of the equation around structural costs, we're still relatively busy around the world.

That said, contributing to margins or maintaining, taking actions that drive efficiency, no different than what our customers are doing is right in our wheelhouse. And we've done that before also and expect to do that again. To frame that, look, it's probably in the 1% range sort of type thing as early days as we get started, and it may be a couple of quarters as we get right sized around what we see in terms of the market. It's a bit of a dynamic market today. So we're targeting what we see.

I think we probably got a pretty good handle on where we need to get from a reduction standpoint, but we'll need to let that play out.

Got it, got it. Okay, Jeff, no, thank you for that answer. And then the other one I have Jeff for you is on the Saudi market, we have all seen the rig count in the country come down, it's too speculative for me at this point to say where it goes, but one thing I've been hearing is that maybe the Saudi market becomes more LSTK over time as activity comes back, or even if it doesn't come back, but look, don't know, but just a philosophical question, if that's what happens, right, the Saudi is more LSTK, Middle East in general is more LSTK, how does Halliburton play in that market? Is it to Halliburton's advantage, or do we have to adapt the way you do things? Maybe just a high level comment on that.

Well, look, we've got very strong muscles in that area, and we've been successful doing that. You know, I I would say our project management organization We do a lot of collaborative work, and we do LST work today. You know, in fact, today, that type of work, LSTGA and collaborative type work that we describe represent more than 20% of our international business. So clearly, I think it is it's in our wheelhouse to do, and it's a strength for us.

And so I would see that as advantageous. So I will start all of that with what I said earlier around our tendering process, which is highly disciplined and is geared towards returns. And so again, volume and market share at the expense of returns is not it doesn't help the cause at all. And so what you'll see us be is very sharp around how we look at those things and make sure that we can make a return. But the capability to do it, we do a lot of it today and really pleased with actually where that whole business is.

Right. Got it. Okay. No, that's fantastic color. And by the way, good update and good progress on the Summit ESP side of things, Jeff. I'll turn it back. Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question or comment comes from the line of Mark Bianchi from TD Cowen. Your line is open.

Hey, thanks. I guess I wanted to ask about sort of doing some math here from the 3Q guide you gave and the outlook you gave for the year for North America and international. It seems to imply a pretty big step down in 4Q to kind of get to the numbers that you talked about. And I guess I'm curious how much visibility you have to that at this point? How are you thinking about, is it more pronounced in international versus North America when we look at fourth quarter?

Hey, Mark, it's Eric. So we're not going to give you an exact guide on what Q4 looks like. There are a lot of moving parts that we touched on today is what The U. S. Activity is going to look like, the amount of white space, the activity in Saudi, Mexico is kind of being on and off, etcetera.

So a lot of things can happen between now and Q4 that will shape Q4, how Q4 looks like. But directionally, to give you some color, we're looking at probably kind of flattish revenue at best it would seem, We'll see a reduction in C and P revenue, an increase in B and E revenue. Margin will continue to soften probably in C and P because of the amount of white space in The U. S. Frac market Jeff talked about, we will see a continued strengthening of the NE margin on top of what we did in Q3.

And we'll see the usual seasonality that we see Q4 over Q3. So, frac in The U. S. Tends to come down, software sales will pick up materially and then typically completion tools in the C and P division go up as well. So, that's kind of how we look at Q4 at this point in time.

Okay, thanks for that, Eric. And I guess, given the cost actions you're taking and the efforts you're making to sort of manage through the market, do you think that CMP margins can hold above double digits as we exit the year?

Yes. Yes. No, for sure. Very much. Great.

Thank you. Our next question or comment comes from the line of Scott Gruber from Citigroup. Mr. Gruber, your line is open.

Yes. Good morning. Just wanna follow that last line of questioning. Eric, the margin improvement you mentioned in D and E in 4Q, is that going to be largely just seasonal factors, some more software sales, etcetera? Or is there any of the mobilization expense and contract start up cost that weighed on 2Q, is there an element of those costs still impacting 3Q or are most of those in the rearview mirror now?

Halliburton (HAL) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Company Participants