This ranking evaluates how Fortune 500 companies are deploying AI, and how technology leaders value those investments relative to industry peers.

Fortune AIQ 75

With a combined revenue of $21 trillion and $2.1 trillion in profits, the 2026 Fortune 500 is the definitive list of America's largest companies.

Fortune 500

Almost $20 trillion in revenue—and a record-breaking $1.87 trillion in profits. Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive list of the biggest companies in America.

The 300 companies on this year’s list brought in over $12.6 trillion in revenue for the latest 12 months, with the median revenue figure at $22 billion.

America's Most Innovative Companies

Industries included in the sector are building materials, forest products, metals, and packaging.

Fortune Sector Leaders: Materials

The Fortune 500, in its 70th year in 2024, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

The Fortune 500, in its 69th year in 2023, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 68th running of the list.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 67th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 65th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 64th running of the list.

Sector

Culture rank

Process rank

Product rank

Years on list

Previous rank

Key Financials (last Fiscal Year)

Revenues ($M)

Profits ($M)

Assets ($M)

Total Stockholder Equity ($M)

Profit Ratios

Profit as % of Revenues

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholder Equity

Earnings Per Share (last Fiscal Year)

Earnings Per Share ($)

EPS % Change (from prior fiscal year)

EPS % Change (5 year annual rate)

EPS % Change (10 year annual rate)

Total Return

Total Return to Investors (last year)

Total Return to Investors (5 year, annualized)

Total Return to Investors (10 year, annualized)

Cleveland-Cliffs, the largest flat-rolled steel producer in North America, supplies iron ore pellets to the automotive, infrastructure, and manufacturing sectors, as well as other key industries. Founded in 1847, the company employs approximately 30,000 workers and has undergone a significant transformation in recent years through the acquisition of AK Steel and ArcelorMittal assets.

Q2 2026

Q1 2026

Q4 2025

Q3 2025

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Q4 2024

Q3 2024

Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF): Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings

legacy

Cleveland-Cliffs

cleveland-cliffs

Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. My name is Kevin, and I'm your conference facilitator today. I'd like to welcome everyone to Cleveland Cliffs Full Year and Fourth Quarter twenty twenty four Earnings Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers' remarks, there will be a question and answer session.

The company reminds you that certain comments made on today's call will include predictive statements that are intended to be made as forward looking within the Safe Harbor protections of the Private Securities and Engagement Reform Act of 1995. Although the company believes that its forward looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. Important risk factors that could cause results to differ materially are set forth in reports on Forms 10 K and 10 Q and news releases filed with the SEC, which are available on the company website. Today's conference call is also available and being broadcast at clevelandcliffs.com. At the conclusion of the call, it will be archived on the website and available for replay.

The company will also discuss results excluding certain special items. Reconciliation for Regulation G purposes can be found in the earnings release, which was published yesterday. At this time, I'd like to introduce Lorenzo Gonzalez, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Kevin, and good morning, everyone. 2024 is in the rearview mirror, and we have great potential for a strong 2025 right in front of us. Our order book has picked up substantially over the past months, and steel pricing is back on the rise. Less than a month ago, our lead times for hot rolled steel were three weeks. As of today, they are seven weeks.

Order book and lead times are our most important forward looking indicators, and they are both in their strongest position in nearly a year. In 2024, demand for steel was the weakest we have seen since 2010, other than during the temporary collapse caused by COVID-nineteen in early twenty twenty. The second half of last year was especially bad with the steel demand from the automotive sector slowing down, construction activity lagging and industrial production taking a hit. This led to the idle of our C6 blast furnace at Cleveland Works last quarter. A lot of this weak demand environment was a function of unnatural market factors at play.

Among these factors, interest rates kept at very high levels by the Federal Reserve negatively impacted our service center customers' ability to buy steel from us. And of course, trade distortions enabled by foreign countries supporting steel overproduction continue to be a major problem. Regarding trade, the steel industry has been dealing with unfair competition from foreign producers for decades. We have always been very vocal in calling out each one of the problems, particularly the dumping of artificially cheap steel into The U. S.

Market, subsidies that foreign governments hand out with abandon to their steel producers, currency manipulation, weak environmental regulations or lack of enforcement and insufficient or no existing punishment for bad actors who manipulate the global market. With the Trump administration in office, action is being taken, and we are starting to see positive signs ahead of us. We at Cleveland Cliffs appreciate the recently announced 25% tariffs on steel importers from all countries. These tariffs are critical to addressing the problem, and we thank the Trump administration to have the courage to implement these tariffs. While The United States continues to be in a net short position on steel, the biggest exporters of steel into The U.

S. Are all guilty of overcapacity and overproduction. To make matters worse, these foreign overproducers of steel are all more carbon intensive than each one of The U. S. Steelmakers, meaning that they overproduce steel and CO2, and then put this steel on a vessel that emits even more CO2.

Cleveland Cliffs is not dependent on imported inputs, and we do not rely on foreign supply chains that can be disrupted overnight. The tariffs will penalize the foreign competitors who have been playing by a different set of rules, while strengthening the domestic producers who actually invest in American workers, American manufacturing and American supply chains. The trade angle isn't just important for steel, but for finished goods as well. For the first time in history, 2024 was the year when sales of imported cars in The United States surpassed sales of domestically made vehicles. Let me repeat this point one more time.

In 2024, the number of imported cars sold to consumers was higher than the number of domestic produced cars sold in The United States. That is exactly why tariffs and a strong industrial policy are necessary to protect and strengthen the American manufacturing base instead of letting it continue to erode. We also appreciate that the recent tariff announcement includes downstream products containing steel, and that should benefit our clients in automotive and in other sectors. The tariffs will also benefit our newly acquired Stelco. That's right.

Despite what some might assume, the best financial year for Stelco in the previous decade was 2018, when 25% tariffs on Canadian steel imports were in place. Estelco sells more than half of its output in Canada, and we compete with other Canadian suppliers who send the material into The United States. The Canadian steel market pricing reflects The U. S. Market pricing.

So, any resulting rise in pricing will flow directly to STELCO as well, on top of the benefit we're seeing from the weakening Canadian dollar. It has now been nearly four months of our ownership of Stelco. I will remind everyone that our acquisition process and review by the DOJ went through seamlessly. The operational transition has been smooth. Lake Erie Works remains best in class from a cost structure standpoint.

A large portion of our expected synergies have already been set in motion, and we are identifying more ways to maximize value from the combination. The best example is directing order flow to maximize all of our mills strengths. This means we can load Lake Erie with the grades they make best and transition some of their more sophisticated grades and orders to our U. S. Mills.

The value we have found here will likely represent most of the remaining synergies. We expect to have the 120,000,000 in synergies set in motion before the end of this year. As for the current state of play at Cliffs in general, we continue to manage costs, optimize operations and maintain our financial flexibility. We have been through cycles before. We know exactly what to do.

We continue to enjoy full support from our investors, and we proved that once again with the recently issued senior unsecured notes, a deal that was oversubscribed and was priced in a few hours after launching. And as we have already explained, the market is certainly pointing in our favor. The first step is the tightening of the scrap market. We have been saying for years that the continued push toward EIFs would force scrap prices higher. That's exactly what's happening now.

Prime scrap supply is inelastic and demand keeps growing. In just two months, we have seen prime prices move up $70 per gross ton. Meanwhile, Cleveland Cliffs is sitting exactly where we need to be. Our iron ore based operations give us cost stability, quality consistency and supply security. This is a long term advantage that we will only get stronger over time.

Our order book is in a much stronger position to start 2025 with a significant uptick in demand. The improvements in automotive have been especially encouraging with increased volumes from both existing and new programs. We are seeing our best pull rates since early last year, a clear sign that we are recovering market share from the competitors that gave away price. These competitors came to win on quality or service, so they gave away the farm on pricing and are now struggling to deliver on performance. No matter how much competition tries to lowball pricing in this market, quality and delivery performance always win in the long term.

This positive trend combined with better demand in other core segments puts us in a great position for the year ahead. After spending the entire second half of twenty twenty four with sub $700 HRC pricing, we are finally starting to see the long overdue bounce. And we are now even better equipped to ride this upside than before with the Stelco and its primarily non automotive book of business in the mix, resulting in a smaller percentage of fixed price contracts for our total Cleveland Cliffs business as a whole. And let's not forget about safety. We had an outstanding safety record in 2024, and that is the direct result of our great relationship with our workforce.

We take safety seriously and the unions do too. We reported a full year 2024 total reportable incident rate or number of injuries per two hundred thousand hours worked of 0.9. And unlike some other companies in this industry, we count everyone inside our fence line, employees, contractors, everyone. Finally, before turning it over to Celso to go through our financial results, I will quickly address a topic I'm sure many of you want to hear about. Given ongoing litigation, we will not be taking questions regarding U.

S. Steel or Nippon Steel today. But our position is well known and our conviction has never changed. We have been steadfast in our opinion that U. S.

Steel's announced sale to Nippon Steel would never close. I said that in December 2023, then in 2024, and I'm repeating that in 2025. Just go back to our conference call transcripts and public statements, and you'll see that we have been correctly predicting this outcome for over a year. The reality is that the deal has been blocked by The United States Of America on serious national security concerns that cannot be mitigated. The CFIUS Committee rightfully recognized this and specifically noted that allowing Nippon Steel, a company fully financed by the Japanese banking system and their near zero interest rates To become a major domestic player in The U.

S. Would negatively impact the future of the entire American steel industry, and that would affect multiple states of the union in the Midwest and beyond. President Trump has said a number of times that Nippon Steel is an unacceptable buyer for a majority stake in West Steel. That said, no situation is so bad that it cannot become a lot worse. For Nippon Steel, it's time to pack and go before their epic M and A disaster becomes a serious diplomatic issue.

As President Trump says, let's see what happens. With that, I'll turn the call over to Sao Jose.

Good morning, everyone. Moving on to our results for Q4 and full year 2024. Our financial performance last year, particularly in the fourth quarter, reflected the difficult market conditions that Lorenzo described. For the fourth quarter, we posted an $81,000,000 adjusted EBITDA loss, which was primarily the result of weaker automotive demand and the impact of lagged pricing. Direct shipments to automotive in the fourth quarter were our lowest since the pandemic and commodity pricing for the last six months of 2024 was the lowest six month stretch since 2020.

Given that over 90% of our shipments are impacted by either automotive pull rates or commodity steel pricing, these multi year lows drove a negative impact in Q4. Fortunately, both of these situations have already begun to improve here into 2025 compared to 2024, just like things improved quickly in 2021 relative to 2020 a few years ago. As Lorenzo detailed, the automotive order book has been remarkably healthy to start 2025, due in large part to market share recovery and commodity steel prices rapidly on the rise. As a result, we view the fourth quarter of twenty twenty four as the trough in our quarterly profitability as we gear up for a much improved 2025. To be clear, with the inclusion of STELCO, for every $100 increase in the HRC price on an annual basis, our yearly revenue would increase roughly $1,000,000,000 all things equal.

And after factoring changes in profit sharing and historical scrap correlations, this $1,000,000,000 impact would largely flow directly down to EBITDA. So if you hold all things equal and look to the HRC curve right now for 2025, you can pretty easily calculate a vastly improved adjusted EBITDA and cash flow for 2025, especially after adding another 2,600,000 tonnes from our Canadian operations. Total shipments in Q4 were 3,800,000 tons, which was lower than Q3 due to the continued idling of the C6 furnace, seasonally weaker demand and only having Stelco for two months of the quarter. Though the C6 furnace remains idled, our Q1 shipment level should improve back above the 4,000,000 ton mark again due to improved demand, better utilizations at our U. S.

Mills and having stelco for a full quarter. Q4 price realization of $976 per net ton looked like a sharp fall of $70 per net ton from the previous quarter, but this was mostly driven by the incorporation of Stelco and their lower priced mix. The inclusion of STELCO into our results obviously helped lower our weighted average unit costs with a reduction of roughly $15 per net ton compared to the prior quarter. Even though we weren't operating at full capacity with the C6 furnace down, we continue to reduce costs across the board. At this time last year, we guided that our unit steel cost would be down $30 per ton year over year.

This is exactly what we accomplished, even in the face of all the headwinds we saw in 2024. Now with STELCO in the mix, we expect our average cost to decline another $40 per net ton in 2025. The cost advantage at STELCO is well documented and the recent weakening in the Canadian dollar has only fortified that advantage even further. It's not just on the operational side either. Looking at our SG and A for 2024, we were down nearly $100,000,000 or 16% from the prior year due primarily to lower incentive compensation.

From a balance sheet perspective, we remain in a remarkably healthy liquidity position following our latest capital raise where we replaced secure ABL borrowings with long term unsecured notes. As of today, we sit here with $3,000,000,000 in liquidity and all of our secured debt capacity remains intact. Following the acquisition and the cash used in the fourth quarter, our leverage sits above our 2.5 times target on a net debt to EBITDA basis. And as we have done historically, that pivots us directly into debt reduction mode. If you look at Cliff's recent history, we have a proven track record of levering up to make strategic acquisitions and subsequently paying down debt quickly.

AK Steel, AMUSA and then FPT, it was the same story each time, it will be the same story with Stelco. We will use 100% of our free cash flow going forward toward debt reduction until that target is reached. The hurdle is not even quite high as high this time either. Compared to where we stood after completing the AKA and AMUSA acquisitions, our leverage is actually already in much better position. On top of that, at the time of those acquisitions, our net pension and OPEB liabilities were north of $4,000,000,000 Those liabilities have been nearly eliminated down by 90% from over $4,000,000,000 down to only $400,000,000 as of the end of twenty twenty four.

Q4 was a rather heavy period of cash use, both from the weak results as well as the buildup of inventory and the release of payables. This inventory build in Q4 is primarily a result of raw materials, particularly iron ore pellets, a situation that we'll be able to rectify here in 2025. This build sets us up well to rapidly respond to the improved demand we are seeing thus far this year. We will also have much lower capital expenditures in 2025 on a pro form a basis, particularly from a sustaining standpoint as we have completed our major reinvestment cycle. Fortunately, as a single mill operation, the Stelco assets were very well capitalized and we do not have any cash us CapEx requirements like we did following the AMUSA acquisition for example.

Our total CapEx is expected to be $700,000,000 in 2025 compared to $800,000,000 in 2024 when you include Stelco. Twenty twenty four represented a cyclical world that we all know as a steel company. I believe in the midst of our weakening results with our focus on cost control and our strategic M and A with STELCO, we positioned ourselves very well for a significantly improved 2025, especially as the wider market improves. I'll now turn the call back over to Lorenzo for his closing statement.

Thank you, Celso. With 2024 behind us, we're ready to reap the benefits of this new era in America. Our focus on manufacturing within The United States finally standing up to unfair competition and not allowing ourselves to be taken advantage of. These efforts are already showing up in our order book and our pricing. The golden age of American manufacturing is coming.

And Cleveland Cliffs, a proud American, owned and operated the steel company, producing steel from Virgin Islands, from Michigan and Minnesota is at the foundation of this effort, ready to support domestic manufacturing and American prosperity. With that, I'll turn it to the operator for Q and A. Kevin?

Thank you, sir. We'll now be conducting a question and answer session. You. Our first question is coming from Martin Englert from Seaport Research Partners. Your line is now live.

I appreciate the time. Next week, The U. S. May move forward with 25% import tariffs with Canada and Mexico. This would be in addition to the steel tariffs already pursued, I believe.

Can you discuss how Cliffs navigate the evolving tariff environment, its implications on price and demand and what the strategy is for the recently acquired Celco asset? And is there an option to move slabs rather than finished steel from Selco into The U. S?

Yes. Look, Selco is a small part of the entire picture. And the entire picture will benefit extremely well from whatever scenario you design, Martin, as far as tariffs. Tariffs are necessary. Tariffs are at the foundation of what President Trump and Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick, are planning to implement in this country, and we fully support that.

That said, STELCO, like we explained during our prepared remarks, STELCO's primarily book of business is in Canada. And we believe that by using our assets south of the board to execute on orders that are coming from American clients, we will largely mitigate the negative impact of any tariffs on Stelco. So we long story short, we believe that any small negative impact on STELCO, if any, which I still don't believe that they will be that will be the case, will be largely offset and surpassed by the benefits to the rest of the footprint that are a lot bigger than the STELCO individually. Another point that I would like to one more time call attention to your attention and the attention of our investors, the best year for STELCO was 2018. And that was just after when President Trump, during his first mandate, implemented tariffs.

So we fully expect that that will be the case again.

This is going back a ways. But thinking about just the mechanics of reporting with tariffs in place in STELCO and adjusted EBITDA, would you plan to report tariffs included or excluded from adjusted EBITDA?

We might have always reported our results as they are, and we do not even know how to do what we have just suggested, Kevin. It was not even part of our line of thought.

Okay. Yes, just double checking. I appreciate that. If I could, one more. On fixed contracts for flat rolled products, how did pricing change for the January resets?

And then just updated sensitivity for steelmaking ASPs taking into account those contract resets, the inclusion of STELCO relative to changes in U. S. Spot market prices?

Yes. Stelco does not participate on that because the book of business is basically spot. I would say, spot. We don't have any contracts to speak of in Stelco. It's called spot and that's a great thing in the current pricing environment.

So for the rest of Cliffs, the fixed contracts are going negotiations are going extremely well, extremely well. Among other things, because we had a very unusual 2024 in which domestic two domestic competitors decided to really dump from the inside. And in some situations, we elected to not play that game. And one of our then big clients became extremely weak and they are no longer a major player, not only because of us but because of other things. So but we helped them become weaker.

Even these clients coming back, everybody else is coming back and coming back quickly. So the scenario is the exactly opposite of what we had in 2024 when they had a low price high fueling everything. At this point, reality is sinking in and nothing like having a government that is committed to bring manufacturing back within the borders of The United States. So everybody is coming to get the domestic supplier, and the domestic supplier is Cleveland, please. Please.

Thank you. Next question is coming from Nick Kyle from B. Riley. Your line is now live.

Thank you, operator, and good morning, everyone. Lorenzo and Celso, I appreciate all the background on your previous debt pay down. I was curious that if we were to see the equity remain under pressure, if you might consider pausing pay down for any share repurchases? And then my second question was, do you have a target level of net debt in mind? Thank you very much.

First of all, Nick, congrats on your promotion. And I will miss Lucas pipes. But I know that Lucas went to a place that I'm sure that he will become a big shareholder of Cleveland Cliffs. So that's a great thing for Lucas, and I'm sure that will be a great thing for B. Riley.

And I hope it will be great for you as well, Nick. As far as that, let me start from the targets. I think Selsu mentioned that we are maintaining our target of two point times EBITDA as our target. And we're going to say, oh, but we're so much higher right now. Well, we are much lower than when we after we acquired our Solar Mirror USA, for example.

So we know how to do these things. M and A is not for tourists. M and A is for the ones that understand how to do M and A. Timing, how to execute and during the backlash of having a couple of quarters like the Q4 that you saw, we know what we're doing. We prepared in Q4 to a great 2025.

So we are expecting a completely different year and we are enduring the bad results and are going to emerge from that point. As far as buying back stock, the answer is a resounding no. At this point, there is absolutely no other thing that we're going to do except paying down debt. Paying down debt is the thing that will continue to build the value of our equity. So the answer is no.

Lorenzo, that's good to hear and I really appreciate the kind comments. I'm sure Lucas would say the same. My next question was curious how we should think about volume cadence over the course of the year and how much of your cost guidance could be predicated on greater fixed cost absorption versus lower raw material costs?

Yes, I'll let Soso answer that one, Nick, please.

Yes. Hey, Nick. Just to echo Lorenzo's comments, congrats again.

the rest of 2025, and I want to actually address a question that Martin had asked previously as it relates to ASPs that I don't think we fully answered. Following the acquisition of STELCO, we're going to have a smaller percentage of our volume under fixed prices. So as we look toward the rest of this year, only about 30 to 35% of our volumes are under fixed pricing and then you have about 20% on a CRU month lag, call it 10% on a two month lag for slabs and 5% on a quarter lag. So I just wanted to make sure that was addressed as well. And then from a cost standpoint, we guided to a $40 a ton reduction for the full year.

And you're going to see that materialize more in the back half of the year than here in Q1, but it's going to be a consequence of a favorable cost mix from the Stelco acquisition, optimization of the integrated footprint and clearing of kind of higher cost inventory, but that's what we're guiding for the full year.

Thanks so much, Selsso. And just to clarify, so that those cost reductions would not include potential of bringing C6 back online?

Correct. Yes, we're not bringing C6 back at this point.

Got it. Well, Lorenzo Selsso, thank you so much for all your comments and continued best of luck.

Thank you. Next question is coming from Phil Gibbs from KeyBanc Capital Markets. Your line is now live.

I want to talk a little bit about the capital expenditures this year and into the future. I know you've got some pretty material projects that you're working on over the next few years. So I don't want to lose sight of the longer term evolution with Middletown and Butler. Maybe give us some thoughts on where those projects stand and timelines and how you're thinking about those right now?

Sure. Our CapEx for this year is very clear, dollars 500,000,000 for the legacy Cleveland Cliffs footprint, dollars 100,000,000 for the Stelco footprint. That's probably in the hindsight even though that's our number since the moment that we committed of the acquisition of Stelco. But this $100,000,000 could be some savings here. I'm not sure if we're going it will be necessary to spend the entire 100,000,000 in this year, but that's the number we have in our books right now.

And another $100,000,000 for the three projects, Middletown, Butler and Wirtan. And that's pretty much what we are planning to spend this year. As far as next year, it will all depend on how things will go, particularly in the Middletown One. I believe that Wheaton is going fast and is going in the right direction. Butler, the same thing, the modernization of the furnaces at Butler.

And you know how important grain oriented electrical steels is for us. So we will continue to spend that money. And the Middletown project, it's all about what's going to happen next with the efforts to produce hydrogen in the area. That project can become more toward natural gas, which for me is more comfortable because it's something that we dominate, particularly direct reduction plant operating under natural using natural gas as reductant, that's exactly what we have in Toledo. So that's the only caveat that I have for that specific project.

But it's so far away. We have so much time to continue to discuss with the new Department of Energy, and we'll go from there. So we're in good shape in all three.

And then on the Wheaton project for electrical steels and related equipment, I can't remember. Do you have a partner there now? I thought that there was some discussion of that. Okay. You do?

We do. And we are buying equipment. So at the right time, we will review all the names and everything. But the point is it's on time and the orders are in place and we are moving very expeditiously to start producing transformers in Weirton in one year from now.

And then my last question is just on, so maybe some clarification just to start the year. Sounds like you will have a little bit better volume than the fourth quarter, particularly with the added month of Celco. But then, it sounds like in the legacy business, you're also swapping a decent amount of tons, call it service center for more direct automotive as you've regained some share and then have some new programs kicking in and some decent demand. So putting that all together, do you actually have respecting that there's also lags, but do you have higher pricing mix in the first quarter than you do in the fourth? Thanks.

Yes, we will have a higher price mix because you mentioned the main reason. We're going to have more automotive in the mix. But make no mistake, overall, at the end of twenty twenty five, Phil, when you compare 2025 with, for example, 2021, you are going to see a better 2025 in comparison to 2021 because overall, we are going to be able to benefit from price increase more instantaneously than we had in that year because on that year, we're overloaded with automotive. At this time, we're not. So the business that's coming back to us is primarily business that will benefit from the higher prices immediately instead of having a lag that is tied to a contract with automotive.

Actually, a couple of competitors of Cleveland Cliffs will have this problem and they will have this problem with a price that's really low, that the price that they committed last year that I did not accept. So 2024 was theirs, 2025 will be ours.

No, just to put some numbers around it. For Q1 ASPs, we're expecting to be up at least $10 a tonne from Q4. Obviously, the monthly lag contracts will be slightly better. The quarterly lag contracts are going to be challenged still. But you're going to see these increased auto shipments from Q4 to Q1 will also benefit pricing.

Thank you. Next question is coming from Chris Lofomina from Jefferies. Your line is now live.

Thanks, operator. Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. Hey, Lorenzo, just first quickly how are you doing? Just quickly on the steel markets.

I mean, obviously, prices have really begun to move higher and you talked about your order books getting better. And we have the upcoming impact of tariffs, which would obviously be good for the medium to long term for you. But I'm just wondering about kind of the cadence of demand. And is it possible that there has been some demand that's being pulled forward ahead of tariffs and maybe after tariffs kick in, we get a period where we have sort of consolidation before the prices start to move higher? Or do you think this is more a reflection of demand really recovering after a very weak 2024?

Yes, I think that is a combination of everything. But demand is coming back. And as 2025 progresses, Chris, you are going to see more and more domestic consumption for the simple fact that they are not going to be able to import anymore. When you put tariffs on steel on every single country And when you don't accept exceptions, you don't create mechanisms for people to start to gain the system by filing exceptions. And more importantly, when we shut down the door in Mexico that brings steel through Mexico into The United States and destroys the marketplace, then we have a great combination to improve and to increase demand.

Of course, in the short term, there will be kind of a rearrangement of the supply chains. But look, nobody can say that it's efficient to like the CEO of one steel company said, some parts move across the border between The United States and Mexico Seven times. And then they call that efficiency. My goodness, that's stupid, with all due respect. So let's produce everything here in The United States and get things back where they belong.

And don't forget, for a country like Mexico, theirs will be stacked. So it's 25% plus 25% makes up 50%. So for the ones that relied in Mexico, time to get another thing to do.

Great. Thanks for that. And then also just on the working capital build in the first quarter, do you would you expect that to begin to reverse in the second quarter? So should we start to have cash inflows through the rest of the year from working capital? And I'm wondering if we might see over the course of the year, the net cash outflow from working capital in the first quarter be more than offset over the course of the year.

So in other words, you get potentially for the full year, you get a benefit from working capital rather than the draw that you had in the first quarter?

Yes, that's right. You nailed it. The working capital build in Q4 was to gear up for a much improved 2025. It was mostly all inventory driven, particularly in raw materials, pellets and coke. So we'll be able to work through all this in 2025.

Chris, just one more thing on capital, on working capital. I could have shut down Minnesota at least one minutee or one point five minutee and produce fewer pellets in Q4 and show a better number and nobody will be saying, oh, there's a cash burn and this and that. I didn't do that. I produced the pelts. Do you know why?

Because I had full confidence that President Trump would keep the promise that he made. Promise made, promise kept. And tariffs are coming, demand is coming, and I have the pellets. Remember, there's a winter between the pellets and the consuming mills. I have the pellets ready to grow.

So we are ready for these tariffs to be implemented. We are ready to take care of the market. We're not going to justify, oh, we don't have feedstock, we don't have scrap, we don't have pellets, we don't have people, we have everything. We produce less tons, but the employees are there and we're ready to go. And that's what you do when you are managing for the future and managing for the near future.

So that's the working capital thing that I would like you to understand. And please make your model demonstrate that because that's going to happen throughout 2025.

Thank you. Next question today is coming from the line of Carlos de Alba from Morgan Stanley. Your line is now live.

Yes. Thank you very much. Good morning. So just to clarify on the working capital, do you expect working capital to generate cash in Q1 or to consume cash in Q1? So I thought that after the increase in the fourth quarter, you would reduce working capital in the first quarter?

Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) Q4 2024 Earnings Call Transcript

Company Participants