The companies on the Global 500 employ 70.2 million people, and their revenue represents more than one-third of the world’s GDP.

Fortune Global 500

With a combined revenue of $21 trillion and $2.1 trillion in profits, the 2026 Fortune 500 is the definitive list of America's largest companies.

Fortune 500

The 300 companies on this year’s list brought in over $12.5 trillion in revenue for the latest 12 months, with the median revenue figure at $24 billion.

America's Most Innovative Companies

AI is a major force shaping this year’s list—but it’s far from the only story.

World's Most Admired Companies

The corporations on our annual list of the world's 500 largest companies combined to generate $41.7 trillion in revenue over the past year.

Almost $20 trillion in revenue—and a record-breaking $1.87 trillion in profits. Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive list of the biggest companies in America.

The 300 companies on this year’s list brought in over $12.6 trillion in revenue for the latest 12 months, with the median revenue figure at $22 billion.

Leaders in all industries rely more than ever on Big Tech—and appreciate the giants that deliver, at scale, without drama.

The corporations on our annual list posted aggregate revenues of $41 trillion for the second year in a row.

Industries included in the sector are electrical equipment and industrial machinery.

Fortune Sector Leaders: Industrials

The Fortune 500, in its 70th year in 2024, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

The 26th edition of the list shows how much esteem Big Tech giants command among other business leaders.

The 25th Fortune World’s Most Admired Companies list suggests that tech giants’ peers respect them as much as ever.

The corporations on our annual list of the world’s largest companies delivered a record $41 trillion in aggregate revenues.

The Fortune 500, in its 69th year in 2023, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

F500-2023-068-Caterpillar

The 100-year-old construction equipment company rose five spots in 2023 from No. 73 last year. In the 2022 fiscal year, Caterpillar’s sales and revenue rose 16.6% to $59.4 billion, marking one of the best years in company history. 
<ul> 
 	<li>Caterpillar moved its global headquarters from Deerfield, Ill., to Irving, Texas, in 2022.</li> 
 	<li>To cope with inflation and increasing costs, Caterpillar raised its equipment prices, which helped boost its sales.</li> 
 	<li>But the heavy-machinery maker still had its fair share of struggles in 2022 in the form of COVID-era supply-chain snarls, inflationary forces, and slow pickup in Chinese demand.</li> 
 	<li>In October 2022, Caterpillar waived an internal policy that would have required CEO Jim Umpleby to retire when he turns 65, allowing him to continue as the top executive.</li> 
 	<li>The company is the world’s leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment, off-highway diesel and natural gas engines, industrial gas turbines, and diesel-electric locomotives, and now has roughly 60% of its operations outside the U.S.</li> 
</ul>

Just as it dominates our economy, Big Tech now dominates Fortune’s annual ranking of corporate reputation.

Aggregate sales hit $37.8 trillion last year—an increase of 19%, the highest annual growth rate in the list’s history.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 68th running of the list.

F500-2022-073-Caterpillar

Caterpillar recovered some of the ground it lost in 2020 after the pandemic brought construction to a near standstill worldwide. The company climbed five spots on the list this year, with 2021 revenue increasing 22% to $51 billion. Its profits increased dramatically as well, more than doubling. The gains reflected the pent-up demand for Caterpillar’s heavy machinery as construction projects picked up.

After a year in which humanity leaned more heavily than ever on tech giants, see which companies topped Fortune's ranking of corporate reputation.

Total revenue for the world’s biggest companies fell 4.8% to $31.7 trillion this year—the first decline in half a decade.

<span data-sheets-value="{&quot;1&quot;:2,&quot;2&quot;:&quot;The 96-year-old construction machinery giant continued to slide in the Fortune 500 rankings, dropping 16 spots in 2020. Caterpillar’s bottom line suffered across all regions throughout the pandemic owing to lower demand. But the manufacturing sector has seen recovery start to pick up as more businesses reopen, and total industrial production rose 2.5% year over year in 2020. That, combined with improved commodity prices, hints at a better year ahead for the world’s largest construction-equipment manufacturer.&quot;}" data-sheets-userformat="{&quot;2&quot;:12673,&quot;3&quot;:{&quot;1&quot;:0},&quot;10&quot;:2,&quot;11&quot;:4,&quot;15&quot;:&quot;Calibri, Arial&quot;,&quot;16&quot;:11}" data-sheets-textstyleruns="{&quot;1&quot;:0}{&quot;1&quot;:71,&quot;2&quot;:{&quot;6&quot;:1}}{&quot;1&quot;:78}">The 96-year-old construction machinery giant continued to slide in the Global 500 rankings, dropping 79 spots in 2020. Caterpillar’s bottom line suffered across all regions throughout the pandemic owing to lower demand. But the manufacturing sector has seen recovery start to pick up as more businesses reopen, and total industrial production rose 2.5% year over year in 2020. That, combined with improved commodity prices, hints at a better year ahead for the world’s largest construction-equipment manufacturer.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 67th running of the list.

F500-2021-78-Caterpillar

<span data-sheets-value="{&quot;1&quot;:2,&quot;2&quot;:&quot;The 96-year-old construction machinery giant continued to slide in the Fortune 500 rankings, dropping 16 spots in 2020. Caterpillar’s bottom line suffered across all regions throughout the pandemic owing to lower demand. But the manufacturing sector has seen recovery start to pick up as more businesses reopen, and total industrial production rose 2.5% year over year in 2020. That, combined with improved commodity prices, hints at a better year ahead for the world’s largest construction-equipment manufacturer.&quot;}" data-sheets-userformat="{&quot;2&quot;:12673,&quot;3&quot;:{&quot;1&quot;:0},&quot;10&quot;:2,&quot;11&quot;:4,&quot;15&quot;:&quot;Calibri, Arial&quot;,&quot;16&quot;:11}" data-sheets-textstyleruns="{&quot;1&quot;:0}{&quot;1&quot;:71,&quot;2&quot;:{&quot;6&quot;:1}}{&quot;1&quot;:78}">The 96-year-old construction machinery giant continued to slide in the Fortune 500 rankings, dropping 16 spots in 2020. Caterpillar’s bottom line suffered across all regions throughout the pandemic owing to lower demand. But the manufacturing sector has seen recovery start to pick up as more businesses reopen, and total industrial production rose 2.5% year over year in 2020. That, combined with improved commodity prices, hints at a better year ahead for the world’s largest construction-equipment manufacturer.

For an astounding 13th straight year, Apple claims the top spot in Fortune’s annual ranking of corporate reputation, based on a survey of almost 3,800 executives, directors, and analysts.

This year's Fortune Global 500 generated $33.3 trillion in revenues and $2.1 trillion in profits.

G500-2020-204-Caterpillar

After a stellar 2018, the 95-year-old construction and farm machinery maker slipped a bit in 2019. Total revenue for fiscal 2019 came in at $53.8 billion, down 2% from the year prior. Tensions between the U.S. and China, one of Caterpillar's biggest markets, have hurt sales, and the broader economic slowdown presents an even more daunting near-term challenge. But Caterpillar has given investors incentives to stick with it during a slow patch: The manufacturer returned more than $6 billion in capital to shareholders in 2019, and increased its dividend by 20%.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 66th running of the list.

F500-2020-062-Caterpillar

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2019 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune Global 500 generated $27.7 trillion in revenues and $1.5 trillion in profits.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 65th running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2018 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 64th running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2017 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 63rd running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2016 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune Global 500 generated $27.6 trillion in revenues and $1.5 trillion in profits.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 62nd running of the list.

Business insiders have spoken: Asked which companies they most admire, more than 4,100 executives, directors, and analysts chose these top 50 All-Stars.

The world's 500 largest companies generated $31.2 trillion in revenues and $1.7 trillion in profits in 2014. Together, this year's Fortune Global 500 employ 65 million people worldwide and are represented by 36 countries.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 61st running of the list. Wal-Mart claims the top spot again. See who made the list.

Global business is back. After limping through a worldwide financial crisis and economic slowdown, the 500 largest companies ranked by revenues shattered all sorts of performance records in 2013: They racked up combined revenues of $31.1 trillion, up 2.5% from 2012, and profits soared 27% to nearly $2 trillion. China’s 95 companies (up from 89 last year) posted $5.8 trillion in revenues. The U.S. has four fewer companies on the list than last year but remains (for now) the country leader, with 128 corporations on the list—including No. 1 Wal-Mart Stores—reporting $8.6 trillion in revenues. 

Wal-Mart stayed on top as its sales crept closer to half-a-trillion dollars. Apple moved into the top five. And UnitedHealth Group continued its steady climb. 

Sector

Industry

Current All-Star Rank

Previous All-Star Rank

Industry Rank

Previous Industry Rank

Overall Score

Innovation

People Management

Use of Corporate Assets

Social Responsibility

Quality of Management

Financial Soundness

Long-Term Investment Value

Quality of Products/Services

Global Competitiveness

Strongest Dimension

Years on list

Previous rank

State

Key Financials (last Fiscal Year)

Revenues ($M)

Profits ($M)

Assets ($M)

Total Stockholder Equity ($M)

Profit Ratios

Profit as % of Revenues

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholder Equity

Earnings Per Share (last Fiscal Year)

Earnings Per Share ($)

EPS % Change (from prior fiscal year)

EPS % Change (5 year annual rate)

EPS % Change (10 year annual rate)

Total Return

Total Return to Investors (last year)

Total Return to Investors (5 year, annualized)

Total Return to Investors (10 year, annualized)

Caterpillar is a global manufacturer of construction and mining equipment, industrial turbines, engines, and diesel-electric locomotives. Formed from the merger of two competitors in 1925, Caterpillar traces its origins to the fertile San Joaquin Valley, California’s agricultural heartland. The company’s name stems from one of the founders’ inventions, which replaced a steam tractor’s rear wheels with a track system that observers likened to a caterpillar as the machine crawled across soggy terrain. Caterpillar has seen its bright yellow machines become a familiar sight at construction sites around the world, while its employees develop products for industries ranging from oil and gas drilling and power generation to marine and rail technology.

Q2 2026

Q1 2026

Q4 2025

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Q4 2024

Caterpillar (CAT): Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings

legacy

Caterpillar

caterpillar

Welcome to the First Quarter twenty twenty five Caterpillar Earnings Conference Call. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Alex Capper. Thank you. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Audra. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to Caterpillar's first quarter of twenty twenty five earnings call. I'm Alex Capper, Vice President of Investor Relations. Joining me today are Jim Humpleby, Chairman and CEO Joe Creed, Chief Operating Officer and incoming CEO Andrew Bonfield, Chief Financial Officer Kyle Epley, Senior Vice President of the Global Finance Services Division and Rob Ringel, Senior Director of Investor Relations. During our call, we'll be discussing the first quarter earnings release we issued earlier today.

You can find our slides, the news release and a webcast replay at investors.caterpillar.com under Events and Presentations. The content of this call is protected by U. S. And international copyright law. Any rebroadcast, retransmission, reproduction or distribution or part of this content without Caterpillar's prior written permission is prohibited.

Moving to Slide two. During our call today, we'll make forward looking statements, which are subject to risks and uncertainties. We'll also make assumptions that could cause our actual results to be different than the information we're sharing with you on this call. Please refer to our recent SEC filings and the forward looking statements reminder in the news release for details on factors that individually or in aggregate could cause our actual results to vary materially from our forecast. A detailed discussion of the many factors that we believe may have a material effect on our business on an ongoing basis is contained in our SEC filings.

On today's call, we'll also refer to non GAAP numbers. For a reconciliation of any non GAAP numbers to the appropriate U. S. GAAP numbers, please see the appendix of the earnings call slides. Now let's advance to Slide three and turn the call over to Chairman and CEO, Jim Hubbleby.

Thanks, Alex. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us. Since the beginning of the year, we have been celebrating our centennial at facilities and trade shows around the world. Earlier this month, we commemorated Caterpillar's founding on April 15 by hosting events across the company, and I had the honor of bringing the opening bill at the New York Stock Exchange surrounded by all living past CEOs of Caterpillar.

It was a historic celebration. On the same day, we also announced that Joe Creed will succeed me as CEO tomorrow, May 1. The announcement followed a multiyear succession planning process by Caterpillar's Board of Directors. I have great confidence in Joe and the rest of the executive office to lead Caterpillar going forward. It's been a great honor and privilege to serve as Chairman and CEO for the past eight years, and I look forward to my new role as Executive Chairman.

Now moving to Slide four. I want to thank our global team for another quarter of solid results, which reflect the benefit of the diversity of our end markets and the disciplined execution of our strategy for long term profitable growth. Although sales were broadly in line with our expectations when excluding the negative impact from currency, we delivered adjusted operating profit and adjusted operating profit margin above our expectations. Very strong order rates resulted in backlog growth of $5,000,000,000 an all time record for organic backlog growth in a quarter. The backlog increased for all segments and was led by energy and transportation.

Our strong balance sheet allowed us to deploy over $4,000,000,000 to shareholders through share repurchases and dividends during the quarter. As you know, the current environment is dynamic, and we will discuss the potential impacts to 2025 in a moment. But to start, I'll share my perspectives about this quarter's performance. Joe will then discuss the second quarter outlook and our full year scenarios. Finally, Andrew will provide a detailed overview of results and key assumptions looking forward.

For the first quarter, sales and revenues were down 10% versus last year. The sales decrease was primarily due to lower sales volume and an unfavorable price realization versus the first quarter of twenty twenty four. Lower sales volume was primarily driven by the impact from changes in dealer inventories. Total dealer inventory increased by about $100,000,000 in the first quarter of twenty twenty five compared to about 1,400,000,000 in the first quarter of twenty twenty four. Machine sales to users were stronger than we expected in the first quarter, resulting in flat machine dealer inventory versus our expectation for growth in dealer inventory during the quarter.

First quarter adjusted operating profit margin was 18.3, above our expectations primarily due to favorable manufacturing costs. We achieved quarterly adjusted profit per share of $4.25 Turning to slide five. As I mentioned earlier, sales and revenues declined 10% in the first quarter to $14,200,000,000 Compared to the first quarter of twenty twenty four, machine sales to users, which includes construction industries and resource industries declined by 1%, but were better than our expectations. Energy and transportation continues to grow and sales to users increased 13% driven primarily by power generation. Sales to users in construction industries were up 3% year over year.

In North America, sales to users were slightly higher than the prior year and better than we expected. Growth in sales to users for residential construction more than offset a slight decline in non residential and lower rental fleet loading. Rental fleet loading was in line with our expectations and dealers' rental revenue continued to grow in the quarter. Sales to users increased in the AIMEE driven by better than expected sales to users in Africa and The Middle East. In Asia Pacific, sales to users declined in line with our expectations.

Sales to users in Latin America continue to grow and at a higher rate than anticipated. In Resource Industries, sales to users declined 10%, which was better than we expected. Mining as well as heavy construction and quarry and aggregates were both better than expected, primarily due to off highway trucks placed into service sooner than anticipated. In energy and transportation, sales to users increased by 13%. Power generation sales to users grew significantly by 58%, primarily due to demand for reciprocating engines for data center applications.

Turbines and turbine related services for power generation also grew. Sales to users of reciprocating engines declined in oil and gas applications due to softness in well servicing. Turbines and turbine related services for oil and gas declined due to a difficult comparison versus the first quarter of twenty twenty four and some delay in timing of deliveries in the first quarter of twenty twenty five. Transportation sales to users increased and industrial sales to users grew slightly from a relatively low level. Moving to dealer inventory and our backlog.

In total, dealer inventory increased by approximately $100,000,000 versus the fourth quarter of twenty twenty four. Machine dealer inventory was about flat and grew less than we had anticipated due to better than expected machine sales to users in construction industries and resource industries. As I mentioned, backlog increased versus year end 2024 by $5,000,000,000 or 17% driven by strong order rates in all three of our primary segments. Our backlog of $35,000,000,000 is a record. Moving to Slide six, we generated MENT free cash flow of $200,000,000 in the first quarter.

The decline versus last year is primarily due to lower profit. We deployed $4,300,000,000 to shareholders through nearly $3,700,000,000 of share repurchases and about $700,000,000 of dividends paid. We remain proud of our dividend aristocrat status as we have paid higher annual dividends for thirty one consecutive years. We continue to expect to return substantially all MENT free cash flow to shareholders over time through dividends and share repurchases. Now I'll turn it over to Joe.

All right. Thank you, Jim, and good morning, everyone. I'll start today with a discussion of our second quarter outlook and a range of scenarios for the full year before discussing our end markets. The first quarter ended with positive momentum after another quarter of better than expected sales to users and record organic growth in our backlog. However, the potential impact of tariffs has increased uncertainty and the situation remains fluid.

I'll start with our expectations for the second quarter where we have the best visibility and then cover the full year. Based on our current view, we anticipate sales in the second quarter to be similar to prior year. Sales growth in Energy and Transportation will be offset by lower machine sales in both Resource Industries and Construction Industries, primarily driven by unfavorable price, while volume is expected to be about flat. We expect lower enterprise adjusted operating profit margins versus the prior year without the additional headwind of tariffs, primarily due to lower price realization. Additionally, for the second quarter, the tariffs which have been announced and implemented this year are currently estimated to be a cost headwind of about $250,000,000 to $350,000,000 This estimate is net of our initial mitigation efforts and cost controls, which represent limited short term actions that we were able to implement quickly.

As you would expect, we are evaluating a broad range of longer term mitigation actions. Many of these actions require more time to implement, are more difficult to reverse and, therefore, require more clarity and certainty on the long term environment around tariffs. As I mentioned, the situation remains fluid, and we will continue to monitor it closely. Throughout our history, we've demonstrated the ability to navigate many different environments. I'm confident we're well positioned to manage the impact of tariffs over time.

Caterpillar is a global company, and we have manufacturing locations around the world. Our largest manufacturing base is in The United States, where we employ over 50,000 full time employees, and we continue to be a net exporter. Caterpillar's business is resilient due to the diversity of our portfolio and the end markets we serve. Moving on to the full year. I remain cautiously optimistic based on how we finished the first quarter.

As Jim mentioned, machine sales to users in the first quarter were better than expected, especially in Construction Industries. This is a continuation of the positive momentum we saw at the end of last year and evidence that the merchandising programs we put in place are yielding results. I'm also pleased with the continued growth in Power Generation as well as the first quarter order intake in all three segments, which led to record organic growth in our backlog. As a result, in a pre tariff scenario, which does not include any impact from tariffs, we would have expected full year 2025 sales and revenues to be about flat versus 2024. This would represent a slight improvement since our outlook last quarter.

In this scenario, we would also expect adjusted operating profit margins to be in the top half of the target margin range based on the corresponding level of sales and revenues. ME and T free cash flow would also be in the top half of the $5,000,000,000 to $10,000,000,000 target range. However, due to the tariff announcements and increasing economic uncertainty, we have evaluated a variety of scenarios to estimate the potential impact on our results for the remainder of the year. In the event we see negative economic growth in the second half of the year, we would expect full year 2025 sales and revenues to only be down slightly versus 2024. This expectation is a reflection of the diversity of our end markets and the strength of our record backlog, especially for large engines and solar turbines where we have line of sight to production for the remainder of 2025.

Before considering additional mitigating actions we might take and assuming the tariffs in place today remain for the duration of 2025, we would still expect to be in the target margin range for adjusted operating profit as well as in the ME and T free cash flow target range for the year. Andrew will provide more details on key assumptions for the second quarter and full year in a moment. To further support our range of scenarios, I'll now share the latest view of our end markets based on current conditions, starting with Construction Industries. As I said earlier, we are encouraged by another quarter of better than expected sales to users and strong order rates across many of our regions as customers are responding to the attractive rates offered through Cat Financial. In North America, overall construction spending remains at healthy levels and infrastructure projects funded by the IIJA continue to be awarded.

Sales to users in residential construction and dealer rental revenues continue to show growth. China has shown positive momentum the 10 ton and above excavator industry, but from a very low level of activity. In Asia Pacific, outside of China, economic conditions continue to be soft. In EAME, weak economic conditions in Europe remain, while conditions are supportive of investment in Africa and The Middle East. Construction activity in Latin America is expected to decline moderately throughout the year.

Moving on to Resource Industries. We are starting the year with strong order rates and backlog growth, particularly for large mining trucks. Rebuild activity is expected to remain healthy. Although most key commodities remain above investment thresholds, customers continue to display capital discipline. Customer product utilization remains high and the age of the fleet remains elevated.

We also continue to see growing customer acceptance of our autonomous solutions. We believe the evolving energy landscape will support increased commodity demand over time, providing further opportunities for long term profitable growth. And finally, in Energy and Transportation. The growth in backlog was driven by robust order activity in both oil and gas and power generation. Demand remains strong in power generation for both cat reciprocating engines and solar turbines.

Our ongoing discussions with data center customers give us confidence in our long term outlook. We are focused on operational improvements to deliver orders today while increasing our large engine output capabilities through the previously announced multiyear capacity investment. For oil and gas reciprocating engines and services, we expect continuing softness in well servicing due to ongoing capital discipline by our customers, industry consolidation and efficiency improvements in our customers' operations. We do see positive momentum, however, in gas compression. As we previously mentioned, we can leverage our large engine platforms across a variety of applications.

Based on current market conditions and well servicing applications, we are able to serve additional power generation and gas compression demand while meeting customer needs. Solar Turbines' oil and gas backlog remains strong, and we continue to see healthy order and inquiry activity. Demand for products in industrial applications is expected to remain at a relatively low level, while transportation remains stable. With that, I'll turn it over to Andrew for a detailed overview of results and key assumptions looking forward.

Thank you, Joe, and good morning, everyone. I'll begin with a summary of the first quarter and then provide more detailed comments, including some on the performance of the segments. Next, I'll discuss the balance sheet and free cash flow before concluding with comments on our current assumptions for the full year as well as our expectations for the second quarter. Beginning on Slide eight, sales and revenues were $14,200,000,000 a 10% decrease versus the prior year. Adjusted operating profit was $2,600,000,000 and our adjusted operating profit margin was 18.3%, both were slightly better than we had anticipated.

Profit per share was $4.2 in the first quarter compared to $5.75 in the first quarter of last year. Adjusted profit per share was $4.25 compared to $5.6 last year. Adjusted profit per share excluded restructuring costs of $05 in the quarter. Other income and expense was unfavorable versus the prior year by $49,000,000 primarily driven by unfavorable foreign currency impacts. Excluding discrete items, the estimated annual effective global tax rate was 23%.

The year over year impact from the reduction in the average number of shares outstanding, primarily due to share repurchases, resulted in a favorable impact on adjusted profit per share of approximately $0.17 Moving to Slide nine, I'll discuss our top line results for the first quarter. Sales and revenues decreased by 10% compared to the prior year, primarily impacted by lower sales volume. Lower volume was mainly driven by the impact from changes in dealer inventories. In addition, price realization and currency were unfavorable year over year. Sales were broadly in line with our expectations if you exclude the impacts of currency movements, which we do not anticipate.

The net sales impact of better than expected machine sales to users and the lower than anticipated machine dealer inventory was about neutral. Price realization was also about in line with our expectations. Moving to operating profit on Slide 10. Operating profit in the first quarter decreased by 27% to $2,600,000,000 Adjusted operating profit decreased by 26% to $2,600,000,000 mainly due to the profit impact of lower sales volume and unfavorable price realization. The adjusted operating profit margin was 18.3%, a three ninety basis point decrease versus the prior year.

This is better than we had anticipated, mainly due to favorable manufacturing costs, including freight and cost absorption impacted by higher inventory levels in the quarter. On Slide 11, I'll review the performance of the segments starting with Construction Industries. Sales decreased by 19% in the first quarter to $5,200,000,000 slightly below our expectations due to unfavorable price realization and currency impacts. Prices realization was more unfavorable than we had anticipated, mainly due to the higher than expected volume of sales to users. Compared to the prior year, the 19% sales decrease was primarily due to lower sales volume and unfavorable price realization.

The decrease in sales volume was mainly driven by the impact from changes in dealer inventories. By region, Construction Industries sales in North America decreased by 24%. In Latin America, sales decreased by 15%. Sales in the EAME region decreased by 13%. In Asia Pacific, sales decreased by 12%.

First quarter profit for Construction Industries was $1,000,000,000 a 42% decrease versus the prior year. This decrease was mainly due to the profit impact of lower sales volume and unfavorable price realization. The segment's margin of 19.8% was a decrease of seven seventy basis points versus the prior year. The margin was slightly stronger than we had expected, mainly due to the lower than anticipated manufacturing costs and lower than expected SG and A and R and D expenses. Price realization was slightly unfavorable compared to our expectations and acted as a partial offset.

Turning to Slide 12. Resource Industries sales decreased by 10% in the first quarter to $2,900,000,000 Sales were slightly higher than we expected on stronger than anticipated sales to users, which benefited from the timing of deliveries of our highway trucks. As we compare to the prior year, the 10% sales decrease was primarily due to lower sales volume, unfavorable price realization and currency impacts. Lower sales to users drove the sales volume decline. First quarter profit for Resource Industries decreased by 18% versus the prior year to $599,000,000 This was mainly due to the profit impact of lower sales volume.

The segment's margin of 20.8% was a decrease of two ten basis points versus the prior year. Margin was stronger than we had anticipated due to better than expected volume, price realization and manufacturing costs. Now on Slide 13. Energy and Transportation sales of $6,600,000,000 decreased by 2% versus the prior year. Sales were slightly below our expectations due to volume as a result of a delay in an expected delivery and unfavorable currency impacts.

The sales decrease versus the prior year was mainly due to lower sales volume and unfavorable currency impacts, partially offset by favorable price realization. By application, power generation sales increased by 23%, industrial sales decreased by 2%, transportation sales were lower by 10%, and oil and gas sales decreased by 20%. First quarter profit for Energy and Transportation increased by 1% versus the prior year to $1,300,000,000 The slight increase was primarily due to favorable price realization, mostly offset by the profit impact of lower sales volume and unfavorable manufacturing costs. The segment's margin of 20% was an increase of 50 basis points versus the prior year. This was slightly stronger than we had anticipated, primarily due to favorable cost absorption and price realization, partially offset by the lower than expected volume.

Moving to Slide 14. Financial Products revenues increased by 2% versus the prior year to over $1,000,000,000 primarily due to higher average earning assets in North America, partially offset by lower average financing rates also in North America. Segment profit decreased by 27% to $215,000,000 The decrease was mainly due to the absence of a favorable insurance settlement that occurred in the prior year and higher provisions for credit losses. The increase in the provision reflected the absence of a nonrecurring reserve release in the prior year and a specific reserve related to a single customer that was provided in the current quarter. Our customers' financial health remains strong.

Past dues were 1.58% in the quarter, down 20 basis points versus the prior year, the lowest first quarter since 02/2006. The allowance rate was 0.95%, remaining near historic lows. Business activity at CAB Financial remains healthy. Retail credit applications increased by 13% and retail new business volume grew by 8% versus the prior year with increases in all regions. This reflects the attractiveness of our sales merchandising programs.

In addition, used equipment inventory levels remain low and conversion rates remain above historical averages as customers choose to buy their equipment at the end of their lease term. Moving on to Slide 15. MEMT free cash flow was about $200,000,000 in the first quarter. This is about a $1,000,000,000 decrease versus the prior year, primarily driven by lower profit. The quarter included our annual payment for '20 '20 '4 short term incentive compensation and CapEx spend of about $700,000,000 We continue to anticipate higher CapEx spend this year likely to be around $2,500,000,000 Moving to capital deployment.

We deployed $4,300,000,000 to shareholders in the first quarter. Nearly $3,700,000,000 was for share repurchases, which included a $3,000,000,000 accelerated share repurchase, or ASR, that may last for up to nine months. The ASR provides us with favorable pricing, which is finally determined at an attractive discount to the volume weighted average price, or VWAP, over the full period of the agreement. Our balance sheet remains strong. We have ample liquidity with an enterprise cash balance of $3,600,000,000 in addition to $1,200,000,000 in slightly longer dated liquid marketable securities to improve yields on that cash.

Now on Slide 16, let me start with a few comments on the full year. We are closely monitoring the evolving economic conditions. Demand signals were stronger than we had expected in the first quarter, including backlog growth across our three primary segments and stronger than expected sales to users, particularly in Construction Industries. These indicators boost our confidence in the resilience of the top line this year. As Joe mentioned, our sales expectations would be about flat for the full year in a pre tariff scenario, which excludes any impact from tariffs.

As a reminder, this compares to our prior expectations for slightly lower full year sales than we communicated to you a quarter ago. Also, as Joe noted, we have run a number of scenarios to estimate the full potential impact of tariffs for the remainder of the year. Our alternative scenario also assumes negative economic growth in the second half of twenty twenty five. This scenario could result in full year 2025 sales and revenues to be only down slightly versus 2024. Result highlights the resilience of our top line, which is supported by the strength of our backlog and the diversity of our end markets.

Now on to margins. In a pre tariff scenario, which assumes no impact from tariffs, we would have expected full year margins to remain in the top half of the adjusted operating profit margin range at the expected levels of sales and revenue. We have also assessed potential cost impacts from the current tariffs for the remainder of the year before any additional mitigation actions. Given the uncertainty of what tariff rates could be and the timing of any additional mitigation actions that we may take once the situation becomes clearer, it is not possible to derive an accurate estimate of the net full year impact of tariffs. However, in our alternative scenario, assuming the tariffs in place today remain for the duration of 2025 and without any additional mitigation actions, which is unlikely to happen, we would still expect to remain within the margin target range at the expected levels of sales and revenues.

Also, want to remind you about two important points impacting our year over year comparatives. As we said in January, we expect the impact of negative price realization to be greater in the first and second quarters of the year. This will moderate as we move into the second half. In addition, we also do not expect a significant decrease in machine dealer inventory as we saw in the fourth quarter of twenty twenty four and still expect dealers to hold inventories about flat for the full year. These factors help to underpin our confidence about the second half of the year.

Moving on, we continue to expect restructuring costs of approximately 150,000,000 to $200,000,000 in 2025, and our anticipated annual effective global tax rate remains at 23% for 2025, excluding discrete items. Turning to Slide 17. To assist you with your modeling, I'll provide our second quarter assumptions. Based on what we see today, we anticipate second quarter sales will be similar to the prior year as sales growth in Energy and Transportation is offset by lower sales in Construction Industries and Resource Industries. By segment, we anticipate lower sales in Construction Industries in the second quarter versus the prior year, mainly due to lower price, the impact of which is expected to be similar to the headwind we saw in the first quarter of twenty twenty five.

We expect slightly positive volume tax as a partial offset. In Resource Industries in the second quarter, we expect lower sales versus the prior year, primarily due to unfavorable price realization, the impact of which is expected to be larger than we saw in the first quarter of twenty twenty five. We also expect a slight decrease in volume. As I mentioned, we anticipate higher sales in energy and transportation in the second quarter versus the prior year, driven by continued strength in power generation and in oil and gas driven by solar turbines. We also anticipate favorable price.

Now I'll provide some color on our second quarter margin expectations. Compared to the prior year, excluding any tariff impacts, we would have expected margins to be lower than the prior year, primarily due to a net headwind from price realization and some unfavorable manufacturing costs and SG and A and R and D increases. In addition, as Joe mentioned, tariffs will represent a net headwind of about $250,000,000 to $350,000,000 for the quarter. I'll make a few comments regarding our segment margin expectations as well. In the second quarter, in Construction Industry, excluding any tariff impacts, we would have expected lower margins compared to the prior year, where the strong prior year margins make for a challenging comparison.

The main driver of lower margins year over year is unfavorable price. While lower than the comparative quarter last year, we would have expected margins to be higher when compared to the first quarter of this year. Now taking tariffs into account, we would expect about 50% of the second quarter net tariff enterprise tariff impact of $250,000,000 to $350,000,000 to be incurred in Construction Industries. In Resource Industries, similar to Construction Industries, a strong prior year margin sets a challenging comparison in the second quarter. Excluding any tariff impacts, we would have expected lower margins versus the prior year, primarily due to unfavorable price, which I commented on a moment ago, and higher SG and A and R and D costs.

In addition, Resource Industries would be expected to incur an additional headwind of about 25% of the net tariff quarters tariff costs in the second quarter. In Energy and Transportation, excluding any tariff impacts, we would have expected slightly higher margins compared to the prior year with favorable volume and price realization partially offset by manufacturing costs and SG and A and R and D increases. For Energy and Transportation, we would be expected to incur an additional headwind of about 25% of the net tariff costs in the second quarter. So turning to Slide 18, let me summarize. Despite the evolving environment, we would expect the range of sales will be flattish to slightly lower as we and we currently expect to be comfortably within our target ranges for adjusted operating profit margins and ME and T free cash flow.

Business activity and customer financial health remains resilient, while our balance sheet and liquidity positions are strong. We continue to reward our shareholders deploying $4,300,000,000 of cash in the quarter. We continue to execute our strategy for long term profitable growth. And with that, we'll take your questions.

Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. Your first question comes from Michael Feniger at Bank of America.

Yes. Good morning, everyone. Thanks for having me on. Just the cost headwind of the $250,000,000 to $350,000,000 you guys identified in Q2, just what are you evaluating in terms of the mitigation as we move through the year? Can we see pricing or cost reduction that can fully offset that as we move through the year?

And is there anything you're seeing in the environment right now in terms of surcharges or price increases as we look at the competitive environment where you guys are positioned in terms of your manufacturing footprint versus maybe other OEMs and brands that might have more import? So just kind of wondering how you're looking at that cost headwind and if we're thinking about pricing as we move through the back half as a lever to mitigate that as we move through the year.

Mike, this is Joe. Maybe I'll take a shot at that and others can chime in here. There's a lot to unpack in that question. As far as the second quarter goes, as I mentioned in prepared remarks, we have taken a number of short term actions, things that we would call no regrets type of actions that we can be pretty nimble with. Examples of those would be obviously some short term cost reductions.

We'll have a look at our overhead costs, things that would fall into the belt tightening situation. So cutting back on travel, discretionary spending. We're able to slow some inbound shipments for certain products. Keep in mind, and many of you know this, we have three point five months of sales of dealer inventory on the ground for most products. And in some products, we have more.

So by slowing down those shipments, it gives us time to see how this fluid situation plays out. And during COVID, we've been since COVID, we've been working making our supply chain more resilient and adding some dual sourcing where we can. That's, I would say, a fairly limited opportunity for us. But where we have the opportunity and it benefits us, we're taking advantage of that. We need to see, obviously, in this fluid situation where it shakes out.

Some of the longer term things that we would consider here require investments. They take time to implement, and they're very difficult to change or pivot from once we do that. Those types of things like moving significantly moving sourcing or supply chains, we really need to see the amount of the tariff. It's going to depend on the product, the situation, where it's coming from, which market we're talking about. When we move sourcing on components, particularly critical components, it requires a lot of testing and validation to make sure it meets the Caterpillar quality and durability specs.

So those take time. And so we would obviously look throughout the year at potentially deeper cost reductions depending on how this plays out. My preference is to protect our investments in our funding for items that we think are going to really help our future growth. And then your question on price, there's a lot of things that go into pricing. And so we need to balance that in context with the amount of tariffs that we can't offset with these other mitigating efforts, along with market conditions, our competitive position.

And just sort of remind you, our focus here is dollar OPAC growth. The current merchandising programs we put in place last year are yielding really positive results over the last starting in the fourth quarter of last year, continued into the first quarter of this year. So any actions we take there, I'm not saying we won't, but we'll have to consider volume impacts with that as well. So it's a fluid situation. I think we would like to see a little more clarity.

We're obviously going to take the actions that are required. But we sit in a really good position right now being able to give you the variety of scenarios and feel comfortable we'll be in our target ranges in any of those scenarios.

Maybe this is Jim, only thing I'd add in is obviously it's a very dynamic situation depending on what the administration in the end decides to do around tariffs. And so there have been certain statements made by members of the administration in China, for example, that current tariff levels are not sustainable. And so again, we're cautiously optimistic here that there will be some trade deals struck and that the tariff impact will be lower than it is currently. So again, as Joe mentioned, we're being cautious and prudent here, taking into account all factors that we have to keep in mind.

We'll move to our next question from Rob Wertheimer at Melius Research.

Thank you. Just first off, Tim, congratulations to you and really everybody at CAT for a remarkable kind of improvement over the past several years. And Joe, congratulations to you as well. You're taking over an interesting time. So question is going to be on construction.

There's lots of crosscurrents going on with kind of the dealer inventory build being de minimis in contrast to a normal quarter. The price being negative despite apparently stronger sell through and then maybe full year dealer inventory not declining. So there's a lot of back and forth. I wonder if you can put color around what customers and dealers are really feeling. Is there just more optimism out there than you expected?

That kind of explains most of it. You would have priced stronger if you thought it was this strong. I mean maybe just talk about how you're managing construction, what those crossroads are.

Thanks, Rob. I would say those metrics all sort of coincide with each other. We put the merchandising programs in place last year. They're yielding results. We've had multiple quarters in a row of better than expected sales to users, frankly better than the industry, which is a positive thing.

So those are yielding good results. That caused us remember, we entered the first quarter with what we felt like was the high side of dealer inventory. So we expected dealer inventory build in the first quarter to be lower than last year, but still have a build. And those higher sales to users caused our dealer inventory to really not have a build in CI. And then also our backlog is going up as a result.

So dealers are ordering to replenish, that will also cause our seasonal pattern to be a little bit different. We probably won't have the level of burn down of dealer inventory in the second half that we saw last year, which gives us confidence in the ranges of sales that we put out there. When it comes to customer sentiment, I think it's the same as everybody. We prefer certainty, but there's cautious optimism and that's resulted in continuing sales users, trends and dealer ordering. I've been personally with a number of our dealers in North America 2 Weeks ago and then once this week with a handful of them.

And they're not they're what they're seeing and saying trends with the information we've given you today. Where we sit right now, I feel like we put ourselves in a really good position to manage our way through the uncertainty.

We'll go next to Tammy Zakaria at JPMorgan.

Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking my question and congrats Jim on your stellar career at Caterpillar and congrats to Joe. Big shoes to fill, but who else better than you? My question is on the tariff impact, $250,000,000 to EUR $350,000,000. I just want to understand how should we think about this for the remainder of the year as in the back half?

Should we just annualize that number for now until this is lapped in the first quarter of next year? Or this is more like 1Q already had some impact, so $250,000,000 and $350,000,000 is the right range for 3Q and also 4Q?

Yes. So a couple of things, Tammy. It's Andrew. First of all, just to remind you that obviously not all the tariffs were impacting for the will impact for the full quarter. Some of it will be a little bit later.

So that is not a full 100% for the full quarter. Secondly, obviously, as we've said, we have not implemented all the mitigating actions we can take. And so hopefully, as time goes on, we'll keep you updated as we go through the year, we'll be able to mitigate some of that and offset some of the that tariff impact as we go through. Finally also, obviously, we are as Jim indicated, let's see what the final actual range is, particularly if we do get some deals done. So some of those, for example, around about just over 50% of our tariffs actually come from China and that obviously is the highest level.

And so again, if that gets moderated at some point in time, that will actually mean quite a significant reduction in the cost base for us as well.

Next, we'll go to Kyle Menges at Citigroup.

Thank you. I just wanted to ask a little bit more on pricing within CI and RI, for the back half. I mean, sounds like you might be exploring some mitigation on price. So I'm just thinking like, could we actually see, as we start to lap these merchandising programs, could we actually see within those segments pricing be flat to positive just as you lap the merchandising and then also maybe do some mitigation? And then just could you elaborate on just what you're hearing in the market from just competitors and what they're doing on price so far, especially the international ones that may be seeing experiencing more tariff impacts?

Yes. And as I said earlier, this is Joe. What we're seeing in the market, it's obviously a competitive environment. It's going to be different by region. We're happy with the merchandising programs that we put in place and traction that's gained in better than expected sales to users and better orders for us, which will create better sales volume for us.

I'm also pleased that it's not just in North America. We saw healthy activity in Africa and The Middle East and in South America as well. It's a competitive environment. We'll continue to watch it like we always do. And when it comes to pricing decisions, a variety of factors always go into that.

And so like I said earlier, I feel like we put ourselves in a really good position to manage our way through this. We'll monitor the situation and then we'll make any adjustments moving forward.

Yes. And as regards to phasing of the year, so in a sort of no tariff scenario, that's basically assuming that there was no price increase in the second half of the year. So effectively though, we start lapping the impact of the merchandising programs, which started to come through stronger in the third quarter. So there will still be some impact in the third quarter moderating from where we are currently. And obviously, as we move into the fourth quarter, we'll get year on year about the same.

As far as the alternative case, we have not assumed any price increases at this point in time because as we said, that is not with no mitigation whatsoever. Obviously, it's going to be somewhere between the two as we go through. Obviously, at this stage, as Joe indicated, we're not taking action until we actually get more clarity, obviously, and then we'll have to weigh those pricing decisions up against what we see from a volume perspective and our competitive situation. So all of those will be part

And then I just want to be clear, lot of that pricing commentary is around CI, which is where I think a lot of the questions are coming. I want to remind everyone each of our segments and businesses is in a different position and we'll make the right appropriate decision for that part of the business.

We'll move to our next question from David Raso at Evercore ISI.

Hi. Thank you for the time and obviously congrats Joe and Jim. Thank For folks looking at the strong order growth and skeptical comments about, oh, it's just a pre buy. But is it true though that you're saying you're not necessarily putting price increases and yet because you're waiting for the tariffs? But is it fair to say that you're not price protecting the backlog?

Because I would think if I'm pre buying, I'm locking in a price. But if I'm putting an order in knowing there is variability on the price, it's a little more reflective of legitimate demand. So are we price protecting the backlog or not? And also on the mitigation factors, right, you mentioned China is a big impact. But it appears you are moving some orders into The U.

S. That were coming from China down on Pira Secaba. So I would think that's already some mitigating factor. So I'm just trying to think about is that mitigating factor sort of in the guide or is that something that's not, you know, you're not articulating? So I'm just trying to get a sense of the the mitigating factors from the move from China to Brazil.

But most importantly, are we price protecting the backlog, the orders that we got through June through March 31? Thank you.

Yeah. Thanks, David. So this is Joe. I would say, remind you the two scenarios we gave in lower scenario, talked about before any mitigating actions. So we'll obviously take what actions we can, and we'll see how this situation that's very fluid plays out, and we'll continue to take the appropriate action.

But to the first part of your question, I think there's a few things that I would point out there. I guess the specific answer to your question, in the backlog, depending on the part of the business, sometimes we have contractual arrangements and pricing if we have frame agreements or solar along orders or certain parts of the business. But generally speaking, we have flexibility on pricing in the backlog. Specifically to your question on the potential of a pre buy, we've seen no evidence of widespread pre buying. Our team has been on the ground at Obama.

As I mentioned, I've been with North American dealers two times over the last month, and we just haven't seen that. And if you think about our backlog, right, we saw growth in all three segments. Remember, ENT and RI, majority of those orders that are in the backlog are backed by a true customer order. They're not dealer inventory stock. And even in CI, there may be a few customers, right, who will have CapEx budgets and maybe they're trying to push them up in the year.

But by and large, if you don't have work or if you're uncertain about having work in the future, you're not probably going to buy a machine to try to get ahead of any sort of pricing. So again, we don't have any evidence of that right now. And I feel like we're in a really good position with the growth in our backlog.

We'll go next to Jamie Cook at Truist Securities.

Hi, good morning and congratulations Jim and congratulations Joe. I guess my question long period of time and looking at the margin performance of your company and down sales in an uncertain macro, I mean, the margins you put up this quarter and what's implied for the year is fairly impressive and you talk to your backlog and your diversity of earnings. But I guess my longer term question for you is, you know, obviously, you guys have your longer term margin targets that are pegged to a certain revenue level that's there. But I'm wondering over time, and in particular, Joe, perhaps this could be the story under your leadership. Do you think the market under appreciates, you know, is there a story potentially for cat where the volatility margins, you know, over time should, you know, decrease?

You know, we look at your margin targets, I guess, the 10% to whatever 20 some percent that over time margins can be within a more narrow range just because of the diversity of the earnings, the operational execution model, growth in services. I'm just wondering if there's a story there where margins can structurally move higher within a more narrow band. Thank you. And no pressure Yep.

Caterpillar (CAT) Q1 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Company Participants