This ranking evaluates how Fortune 500 companies are deploying AI, and how technology leaders value those investments relative to industry peers.

Fortune AIQ 75

The companies on the Global 500 employ 70.2 million people, and their revenue represents more than one-third of the world’s GDP.

Fortune Global 500

With a combined revenue of $21 trillion and $2.1 trillion in profits, the 2026 Fortune 500 is the definitive list of America's largest companies.

Fortune 500

The 300 companies on this year’s list brought in over $12.5 trillion in revenue for the latest 12 months, with the median revenue figure at $24 billion.

America's Most Innovative Companies

AI is a major force shaping this year’s list—but it’s far from the only story.

World's Most Admired Companies

The corporations on our annual list of the world's 500 largest companies combined to generate $41.7 trillion in revenue over the past year.

Almost $20 trillion in revenue—and a record-breaking $1.87 trillion in profits. Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive list of the biggest companies in America.

The 300 companies on this year’s list brought in over $12.6 trillion in revenue for the latest 12 months, with the median revenue figure at $22 billion.

Leaders in all industries rely more than ever on Big Tech—and appreciate the giants that deliver, at scale, without drama.

The corporations on our annual list posted aggregate revenues of $41 trillion for the second year in a row.

Industries included in the sector are banks, insurance, and real estate companies.

Fortune Sector Leaders: Financials

The Fortune 500, in its 70th year in 2024, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

The 200 companies on this list are transforming industries from the inside out.

The 26th edition of the list shows how much esteem Big Tech giants command among other business leaders.

The 25th Fortune World’s Most Admired Companies list suggests that tech giants’ peers respect them as much as ever.

The 300 companies on this list are transforming industries from the inside out.

The Fortune 500, in its 69th year in 2023, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

Just as it dominates our economy, Big Tech now dominates Fortune’s annual ranking of corporate reputation.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 68th running of the list.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 67th running of the list.

F500-2021-180-Bank of New York Mellon

Formed from the merger of The Bank of New York and the Mellon Financial Corporation in 2007, the investment banking services holding company manages trillions of dollars in assets across 35 countries.

For an astounding 13th straight year, Apple claims the top spot in Fortune’s annual ranking of corporate reputation, based on a survey of almost 3,800 executives, directors, and analysts.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 66th running of the list.

F500-2020-159-BNY-Mellon

Founded in 1784, the bank holding company provides financial services and offers investment management and as of Q1 2020 had $1.8 trillion in assets under management.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2019 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 65th running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2018 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 64th running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2017 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 63rd running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2016 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 62nd running of the list.

Business insiders have spoken: Asked which companies they most admire, more than 4,100 executives, directors, and analysts chose these top 50 All-Stars.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 61st running of the list. Wal-Mart claims the top spot again. See who made the list.

Wal-Mart stayed on top as its sales crept closer to half-a-trillion dollars. Apple moved into the top five. And UnitedHealth Group continued its steady climb. 

Sector

Industry

Current All-Star Rank

Previous All-Star Rank

Industry Rank

Previous Industry Rank

Overall Score

Innovation

People Management

Use of Corporate Assets

Social Responsibility

Quality of Management

Financial Soundness

Long-Term Investment Value

Quality of Products/Services

Global Competitiveness

Strongest Dimension

Years on list

Previous rank

State

Key Financials (last Fiscal Year)

Revenues ($M)

Profits ($M)

Assets ($M)

Total Stockholder Equity ($M)

Profit Ratios

Profit as % of Revenues

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholder Equity

Earnings Per Share (last Fiscal Year)

Earnings Per Share ($)

EPS % Change (from prior fiscal year)

EPS % Change (5 year annual rate)

EPS % Change (10 year annual rate)

Total Return

Total Return to Investors (last year)

Total Return to Investors (5 year, annualized)

Total Return to Investors (10 year, annualized)

BNY is the world’s largest custodian bank and securities services company, holding over $55 trillion in assets. It’s also one of the biggest asset managers in the world with roughly $2.1 trillion in funds. BNY serves over 90% of Fortune 500 companies, as well as central banks and sovereign wealth funds, family offices, and other financial institutions. Founded in 1784 by Alexander Hamilton, the Bank of New York merged with Mellon Financial Corp. in 2007 to create the current company.

Q2 2026

Q1 2026

Q4 2025

Q3 2025

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Q4 2024

Bank of New York (BNY) (BNY): Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings

legacy

Bank of New York (BNY)

bank of new york (bny)

Good morning and welcome to the 2025 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call hosted by BNY. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. Please note that this conference call and webcast will be recorded and will consist of copyrighted material. You may not record or rebroadcast these materials without BNY's consent. I will now turn the call over to Marius Merz, BNY Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to our Third Quarter Earnings Call. I'm here with Robin Vince, our Chief Executive Officer, and Dermot McDonogh, our Chief Financial Officer. As always, we will reference the quarterly update presentation, which can be found on the Investor Relations page of our website at bny.com. I'll note that our remarks will contain forward-looking statements and non-GAAP measures. Actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Information about these statements and non-GAAP measures is available in the earnings press release, financial supplement, and quarterly update presentation, all of which can be found on the Investor Relations page of our website. Forward-looking statements made on this call speak only as of today, October 16, 2025, and will not be updated. With that, I will turn it over to Robin.

Thanks, Marius. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. Let me start with a few highlights before Dermot takes you through our financials for the quarter in greater detail. As summarized on page two of our quarterly update presentation, BNY reported another quarter of strong results. Record revenue of $5.1 billion was up 9% year-over-year. We saw broad-based strength, including double-digit revenue growth across the platforms that make up our Security Services and Market and Wealth Services segments, and we drove approximately 500 basis points of positive operating leverage. Our pre-tax margin improved to 36%, and we generated a return on tangible common equity of 26%. Taken together, we reported earnings per share of $1.88, up 25% year-over-year. The third quarter presented a largely constructive operating environment. Despite a cooling labor market and inflation lingering above the Federal Reserve's 2% target, the U.S. economy remained resilient.

Equity markets continued to climb, credit spreads remained tight, and the Fed ultimately resumed rate cuts. Across our platforms, we saw solid growth in client balances, as well as robust trading, clearing, and settlement activity. While the finalization of U.S. tax legislation and the prospect of deregulation are positives for the economic outlook, uncertainty and multiple tail risks remain: geopolitical conditions, trade policies, fiscal deficits around the world, and the sustainability of enthusiastic markets, to name a few. Against this backdrop, we continued to execute on our mission of reimagining BNY. This includes our two core transformation programs: a new commercial model and our platforms operating model. Both are continuing to show results, and both have a lot of runway ahead. We recently reached the one-year anniversary of the new commercial model.

Year one was about bringing the company together, aligning our teams, and proving that when we show up as one BNY, we can win. Now we are raising the bar. The next phase of our commercial model is about embedding the habits of operating as one BNY into our daily rhythms and shifting from just connecting the dots to also delivering integrated solutions with pace and scale. We were pleased to announce several wins in the third quarter that demonstrate how BNY is powering growth for our clients, both longstanding and new. Franklin Templeton, a client for nearly three decades, expanded its relationship with BNY to provide a full suite of asset servicing and FX capabilities for its U.S.-listed ETF products, tapping our market-leading platform to support one of its fastest-growing businesses.

TIAA, who has had a 20-year relationship with BNY Pershing, yesterday announced that they have selected our Wove advisory platform as the unified wealth solution across TIAA Wealth Management's broker-dealer, investment advisor, and bank custody businesses. Our early commitment to the digital asset space, paired with the principles of safety, scalability, and innovation that have defined BNY for centuries, now positions us to support the growing institutional adoption of digital asset products. In just one example from this past quarter, OpenEden, a leading platform for the tokenization of real-world assets headquartered in Singapore, appointed BNY as investment manager and primary custodian for the underlying assets of its flagship tokenized U.S. Treasury Bills Fund. As global capital markets move toward an always-on operating model, blockchain technology and digital asset adoption are becoming important enablers.

In a meaningful step toward enhancing the utility of money market fund shares, we announced a collaborative initiative with Goldman Sachs to maintain on blockchain technology a mirror record of customers' ownership of select money market funds, live and available through our LiquidityDirect platform. This includes a new token-enabled share class of our own BNY Investments Drivers Treasury Securities Cash Management Fund. We are encouraged by developments in the U.S. regulatory landscape that will further enable tokenized products and allow us to support clients as they consider moving to a more on-chain financial world. All of this product innovation, combined with our commercial model 2.0, is allowing us to be more for our clients and drive higher and more sustainable organic growth in the years to come. Turning to another one of our transformations, the ongoing transition into our platforms operating model.

More than 70% of employees are now working in the model, and we expect to complete the remaining transition over the course of the next year. It is still early days, but we continue to gather meaningful proof points of benefits. For example, faster client onboarding, more automated delivery of complex NAVs, and more modern billing processes. Our progress in the model is creating real capacity to invest in growth, to innovate for clients, and to power our culture. Our experience has been that it takes 12-18 months after the initial activation of a platform for teams to start realizing the full benefits of this new way of working. That means that while we will be entirely operational in the new model by the fall of next year, we don't expect to see the full benefits of these new operating rhythms until early 2028.

As we continue making steady progress on both of our two transformations, as well as the broader reimagining of our company, we are always focused on what's next. A prime example of this is how we are embracing the power and benefits of AI. This past quarter, we announced a collaboration with Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh to create the BNY AI Lab at CMU. By bringing together CMU's academic leadership and BNY's market expertise, we will advance AI research, responsible governance, and deployment. At BNY, AI is for everyone, everywhere, and for everything. The investments we've made have been focused on creating the technology foundation to go faster, but adoption and success are ultimately driven by culture. By putting AI in the hands of everyone at BNY, we intend to develop fluency and create capacity for our people to focus on higher-value work.

This translates to how we show up for our clients and innovate more broadly. Last month, we launched the next version of BNY's AI platform, ELIZA 2.0, smarter, faster, and easier to use. Across the company, our people are working together to embed AI solutions into our workflows. By the end of the third quarter, we had 117 AI solutions in production. That is an increase of 75% compared to the prior quarter, and it includes agents that help identify new business leads, write code, automate payment processing, accelerate client onboarding, and increase automation of reconciliations. We are also leveraging Agentic AI to deploy digital employees. Over 100 of them are already working side by side with our people on tasks such as payment validations and code repairs. We believe our AI opportunity is significant, and we are pursuing it with urgency.

Before I hand it over to Dermot, I want to close by acknowledging the tremendous work of our people. As I visit our offices around the world and spend time with our teams, the excitement and drive within the company is palpable. It is our people and culture that propel us forward on our mission to unlock BNY's full potential for our clients and our shareholders. We are executing with purpose, powering our culture to run our company better so that we can be more for our clients. We have a lot of work ahead of us, but the clear signs of progress, both in terms of our reported financials and the leading indicators for future success across the company, give us confidence that the strategy is working. With that, over to you, Dermot.

Thank you, Robin, and good morning, everyone. I'll start with our consolidated financial results for the third quarter on page three of the presentation. Total revenue of $5.1 billion was up 9% year-over-year. Fee revenue was up 7%. That included 10% growth in investment services fees from our security services and market and wealth services segment, driven by net new business, higher client activity, and market values. Investment management and performance fees were down 2%, reflecting the mix of AUM flows, the adjustment for certain rebates we discussed in prior quarters, and lower performance fees, partially offset by higher market values and the favorable impact of a weaker U.S. dollar. While not on the page, I will note that firm-wide AUCA of $57.8 trillion were up 11% year-over-year, reflecting client inflows and higher market values.

Assets under management of $2.1 trillion were flat year-over-year, reflecting higher market values offset by cumulative net outflows. Foreign exchange revenue was down 5% year-over-year, reflecting the impact of corporate treasury activity, partially offset by growth in client activity. Investment and other revenue was $208 million in the quarter, including a $12 million disposal gain. Net interest income of $1.2 billion was up 18% year-over-year, driven by continued reinvestment of maturing investment securities at higher yields, as well as balancing growth, partially offset by changes in deposit mix. Provision for credit losses was a benefit of $7 million in the quarter, primarily driven by changes in the macroeconomic forecast, partially offset by higher reserves related to commercial real estate exposure. Expenses of $3.2 billion were up 4% year-over-year, both on a reported and an adjusted basis.

The variance excluding notable items reflects higher investments, employee merit increases, higher revenue-related expenses, and the unfavorable impact of the weaker dollar, partially offset by efficiency savings. Taken together, we reported earnings per share of $1.88, up 25% year-over-year. Excluding the impact of notable items, earnings per share were $1.91, up 26% year-over-year. Our reported pre-tax margin was 36%, and our return on tangible common equity was 26% in the quarter. Turning to capital and liquidity on page four, our tier one leverage ratio for the third quarter was 6.1%, unchanged from the prior quarter. Our CET1 ratio was 11.7%, up from 11.5% in the prior quarter, reflecting capital generated through earnings and a net increase in accumulated other comprehensive income, partially offset by capital returns through common stock repurchases and dividends. Risk-weighted assets were up 1% sequentially.

Over the course of the third quarter, we returned approximately $1.2 billion of capital to our common shareholders, resulting in a 92% total payout ratio year-to-date. With regards to liquidity, the consolidated liquidity coverage ratio was 112%, flat sequentially, and the consolidated net stable funding ratio was 130%, compared to 131% in the prior quarter. Next, net interest income and balance sheet trends on page five. Net interest income of $1.2 billion was up 18% year-over-year and up 3% quarter-over- quarter. Sequentially, net interest income increased due to reinvestment of maturing securities at higher yields, partially offset by changes in deposit mix. Average deposit balances were flat sequentially, as the typical seasonal decline over the summer was offset by idiosyncratic client balances related to CLO activity and M&A escrows. Non-interest-bearing deposits grew by 3%, and interest-bearing deposits were down by 1% quarter-over-quarter.

Accordingly, average interest earning assets were also flat sequentially. Cash and reverse repo balances decreased by 2%, loans increased by 2%, and investment securities balances increased by 1% quarter-over-quarter. Turning to our business segments, starting on page six, security services reported total revenue of $2.5 billion, up 11% year-over-year. Total investment services fees were also up 11% year-over-year. In asset servicing, investment services fees increased by 12%, representing strong year-over-year growth driven by higher client activity and market values. As we support our clients in building their businesses on the strength of our platforms, we are also benefiting from secular growth in attractive markets. In the third quarter, our ETF AUCA outperformed market growth and increased by 35% year-over-year, driven by higher market values, client inflows, and net new business.

Alternatives AUCA grew by 12% year-over-year, with particular strength in our private markets segment. It is also worth highlighting that almost half of all asset servicing wins in the quarter represented multi-line of business solutions, underscoring the growing effectiveness of our One BNY strategy and the enablement through our new commercial model. In issuer services, investment services fees were up 10%, primarily driven by strong client activity in depository receipts. Across the segment, foreign exchange revenue was up 4% year-over-year on the back of higher client volumes. Net interest income for the segment was up 10% year-over-year. Segment expenses of $1.7 billion were up 6% year-over-year, driven by higher investments, severance, revenue-related expenses, and employee merit increases, partially offset by efficiency savings. Security services reported pre-tax income of $806 million, up 26% year-over-year, and a pre-tax margin of 33%.

On to market and wealth services on page seven. In our Market and Wealth Services segment, we reported total revenue of $1.8 billion, up 14% year-over-year. Total investment services fees were up 9% year-over-year. In Pershing, investment services fees were up 7%, reflecting higher market values and client activity. Net new assets were $3 billion in the quarter, driven by inflows from existing and new clients, partially offset by the deconversion of business lost in the prior year. Going forward, we expect net new asset growth to re-accelerate as we completed this previously disclosed deconversion in the third quarter. In clearance and collateral management, investment services fees were up 12%, driven by broad-based growth in collateral management balances and clearance volumes. Average collateral balances increased 14% year-over-year, with growth from both existing and new clients.

In treasury services, investment services fees were up 7%, primarily reflecting net new business. Net interest income for the segment was up 26% year-over-year. Segment expenses of $895 million were up 7% year-over-year, driven by higher investments, employee merit increases, and higher revenue-related expenses, partially offset by efficiency savings. Taken together, our Market and Wealth Services segment reported pre-tax income of $875 million, up 24% year-over-year, and a pre-tax margin of 50%. Turning to investment and wealth management on page eight, our Investment and Wealth Management segments reported total revenue of $824 million, down 3% year-over-year. Investment management fees were down 1% year-over-year, driven by the mix of AUM flows and the adjustment for certain rebates, partially offset by the impact of higher market values and the weaker dollar.

Segment expenses of $640 million were down 5% year-over-year, driven by lower revenue-related expenses and efficiency savings, partially offset by employee merit increases, higher investments, and the unfavorable impact of the weaker dollar. Investment and wealth management reported pre-tax income of $184 million, up 5% year-over-year, and our pre-tax margin expanded to 22%. As I mentioned earlier, assets under management of $2.1 trillion were flat year-over-year. In the third quarter, we saw $33 billion of net outflows from long-term strategies and $34 billion of net inflows into cash. Wealth management client assets of $348 billion increased by 5% year-over-year, primarily driven by higher market values, partially offset by cumulative net outflows.

Reflecting on our investment and wealth management segment for a moment, under new leadership over the past year, we have begun taking important steps to reorganize, streamline operations, and start enabling the business to leverage BNY's broader portfolio of platforms. Additionally, we have started bolstering the team with a number of strategic hires and internal moves to further strengthen product distribution and client coverage expertise. Along the way, we are being mindful of protecting the unique investment processes of our individual investment firms. While we are still in the very early stages of unlocking the growth opportunities associated with investment and wealth management, security services, and Pershing truly pulling in the same direction, we are encouraged by the progress over the past few months. Page nine shows the results of the other segment.

For this segment, I'll just note that the year-over-year decrease in revenue is primarily driven by higher net securities losses, and the sequential increase primarily reflects gains realized on the sale of real estate. I'll close with our financial outlook for the remainder of the year. On the back of a strong third quarter, we expect net interest income in the fourth quarter to be approximately flat sequentially, which would ultimately result in full year 2025 net interest income to be up 12% year-over-ear. We continue to expect expenses, excluding notable items, for the full year to be up approximately 3% year-over-year. We currently project our effective tax rate for the fourth quarter to be approximately 21%, which would bring our effective tax rate for the full year into a range of 21%-22%.

Finally, we expect to continue returning capital at a pace that is consistent with the total payout ratio of 90%-100% for the full year 2025. To conclude, our results reflect the disciplined execution and collective effort of our teams around the world. We're encouraged by our progress and remain focused on delivering consistent long-term value for our clients and shareholders. With that, operator, can you please open the line?

If you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. As a reminder, we ask that you please limit yourself to one question and one related follow-up question. We'll take our first question from Mike Mayo with Wells Fargo Securities.

Hi. My question is, how much of this growth year over year would you attribute to actions that you've taken versus just a generally good market backdrop? I recognize that you have One BNY, which is now the new commercial model. I recognize that your platform operating model, you said it's 70% done. I also recognize that you have ELIZA 1.0. You have a lot of initiatives taking place. I'm sure you can claim some credit, but probably not all credit. There's probably going to be a quarter at some point where markets tank and things don't look as good. How much is due to what you're doing and how much is due to the market?

Hey, Mike. Good morning. It's Dermot here. Let's reflect on the past several quarters. In both Robin and my prepared remarks, the intersection of the commercial model and the platform operating model really kind of positioned the company in a much better way than previously to take advantage of the market opportunities when the markets are constructive. They have been constructive for the last few quarters. Now we're in a position to be able to take advantage of that. That's a point I think that's an important point, number one. That hasn't always previously been the case when markets have been constructive and BNY has been able to take advantage of that.

The second thing I would say, with the one-year anniversary of the commercial model and a multi-year phased approach to the platform operating model, we're now being able to stitch together solutions for our clients and do that cross-selling thing that we've talked about in prior quarters. Now you can see it in execution. In the prepared remarks, we talked about the wins in asset servicing this quarter, that nearly half of them were due to we were in a position to be able to sell multi-line of business solutions to the existing clients of asset servicing. When you take a step back and look at that 7% fee growth, it's a mixture of organic growth, higher market levels, and then FX. It's all of the above. The proportion of each one is pretty balanced, I would say.

We're very pleased about how we're being able to drive organic growth for the company, particularly this year.

Mike, I'm going to just add a couple of quick things on top of that because we talked about nine months ago about this concept of beta and mega trends and the fact that you're right, the backdrop of the market has been very constructive. What we've done is we've gradually repositioned and evolved the company to be able to take more advantage of that backdrop. Dermot mentioned that. It really is worth a quick click into it because this diversified set of platforms and the way in which we've been emphasizing the growth in some of them is important. Remember, our businesses collectively fire on different cylinders. Equity markets up, good for some businesses. Fixed income markets up, good for different businesses. Transaction volumes up, good for other businesses. Capital markets activity up, good for other businesses.

The execution and clearing and settlement volume type of activity under the hood, GDP growth, which is more correlated to our payments and treasury services business, and of course, increasingly, software and services. This orientation of ourselves to be more diversified, more platforms-oriented is a very definitive strategy in order to be able to make more money in more different types of markets over time. The de-risking of the balance sheet, and you can see that in the consistency of NII, is part of it. Just to give you a couple of facts around it, you know you're fond of our trust bank businesses. If you define for a second asset servicing, investments, and wealth as that core of the trust bank businesses, which I think most people would think is the case, that now represents less than 40% of the company's pre-tax income.

Those businesses have been growing, and we love them. The non-trust bank, more platform-like businesses, corporate trust, depository receipts, treasury services, clearing, collateral management, Pershing, pretty long list, they now represent about two-thirds of the pre-tax income of the company. That's up from three years ago when it was only 55%. Everything's growing. The trust businesses are growing. The non-trust businesses are growing faster. They have higher margin. We're positioning ourselves for more different types of environments with a more diversified platform.

will move to our next question from Glenn Schorr with Evercore ISI. Your line is now open.

Hi. Thanks. Thanks a lot. Great question on NII and the repositioning you talked about. 18% this quarter. You told us next quarter will be up 12% year-on-year. We've had a couple of rate cuts, a couple more coming forward. Can you expand a little bit more about de-risking the balance sheet and how you've changed your approach towards interest rate risk management as we head into this potentially lower rate backdrop? Thank you.

Morning, Glynn. Thanks for the question. I would say, and look, I said this to Robin earlier in the week when we were preparing for this call, when I was going through it with what we now kind of fondly call the tripod within the firm, which is Lyda, who runs our deposit platform, Tiffany, who's our Treasurer, and Jason, who's our CIO. The sophistication and the investment that we've made over the last three years in our tools and our risk management and how we analyze, run scenarios, talk to all the different businesses to predict where deposits will be just gives us a real confidence around the baseline and the strength. Our balance sheet is very clean. It's very liquid. We talk a lot about the $1.7 trillion liquidity funnel that we have.

Every day when we come in, we see this funnel, and we can see where we can help clients maximize the return on their cash and at the same time kind of optimize our kind of deposit mix and where we are. I think the reason for the strength in NII this quarter was really around that. In my prepared remarks, and if you reflect back on when I talked about it on the Q2 call, we kind of said Q3 was going to be a tough comp, given last year in terms of there was a lot of activity. This year we did see some seasonal decline in deposits, but that was more than offset by a pickup in, as Robin said, in the answer to the last question, capital markets activity, strong activity in the CLO space. We were able to serve clients in a very differentiated way.

There was a nice bit of M&A activity, and we have a nice M&A escrow business. We were able to serve our clients in that space too. That drives fees. It also drives healthy deposits, which can attract NII for us. Going forward from here, I kind of said some of that activity will moderate into Q4, which kind of I kind of give the prediction that our base case is that we expected the balances for the balance of the year to be kind of flat sequentially.

Thanks, Rob. Thanks, Rob. Thanks, Dermot.

We'll move to our next question from Brennan Hawken with Bank of Montreal.

Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Dermot, you just touched on this a little bit with the point around M&A escrow business. You know we've been in this sort of capital markets for a while, and we're starting to see M&A announcements of IPO activity, which generally bodes well for securities lending. What early trends have you seen on the back of that, and how should we be thinking about modeling those revenue lines if the capital markets environment remains?

You broke up a little bit, Brennan, on the question. Could you just repeat it again? The capital markets activity as it relates to which aspect of our business? Sorry.

Sorry about that, Dermot. Securities lending, the securities lending part, like we've seen hard to borrow start to pick up on the back of M&A, merger arb, IPO activity, and the like. I was curious about how we would think about what that impact could be on securities lending going forward.

We haven't seen on that specific one, we haven't seen anything, a noticeable change in that. There was nothing that I would kind of bring to your attention that we kind of see as a step function change that I would highlight as it relates to forward potential for us in that business. As you'll know, we are the world's largest agency lenders. We expect that's a very nice business for us. We're very focused on it. There's nothing there for me to highlight to you on this call.

Yeah. I would just add to that, Brennan, that you know it's a good business. It's an important business. Its greatest value is actually its adjacency to our broader collateral management franchise because it's the lending, but it's also the reinvest. It's also our new product, CollateralOne, which adds in the broader collateral management globally to the whole mix. We become one-stop shopping for clients across all of these different components. If they do securities lending with us, some of these other things become particularly attractive. I think the heart of your question, which is around capital markets activity and how it drives us, is actually more to the corporate trust platforms, as you referred. It's depository receipts. It's debt capital markets. It's markets overall.

While the lending activity is part of it, I would say in the grand scheme of our capital markets footprint, it's a smaller part of it.

Got it. Thanks for that caller. I appreciate it. Dermot, you spoke to the fact that the offboarding, I believe you said, was finished. Within wealth, just a couple of questions. Darts for Pershing was a little soft. It looked a little bit more pronounced than typical summer slowdown. If there was any color around that. You also landed a nice Wove win recently with the TIAA Wealth Management business. I'm certainly familiar with TIAA's asset management business, but could you help us understand the size of the wealth business and what we could expect from that?

Look, on Wove, we've signed over 50 clients onto the platform now. We're very pleased and proud of the TIAA announcement. It's been a lot of discussion with that. Very important clients, as Robin says, they've been with us for a long time, and we're happy to be able to serve them in a new and differentiated way. I think when you take a step back and look at Pershing overall as a business, over the last 12 months, we've had this deconversion. Over the prior 12 months, we had the First Republic conversion. As a general matter, there's been kind of noise flowing through the results. Sometimes we don't see the underlying performance of the business because of the deconversions. I would say overall, this year, Pershing has performed well for us.

Q2 had high levels of activity, and I would say the DARTs were high because of all the activity that we saw in terms of client behavior around Liberation Day. Q3 kind of being a seasonally quieter business. When we take a step back and we think about Pershing, and it's a $3 trillion AUM business within the wealth tech sector space, you see new entrants into it, and we like competition. The fact that new entrants are coming in kind of allows us to show what we have to offer clients. We're excited about the business. We're excited about the growth potential. We're now with the deconversion behind us, and we expect growth in net new assets to re-accelerate for the balance of the year.

Excellent. Thank you for taking my questions.

We'll take our next question from David Smith with Truist Securities.

Good morning. You mentioned some potential turbulence and headwinds to the money market ecosystem coming up right now with the rise of stablecoins on the one hand, coming amidst a backdrop of falling rates. Do you think either of these could put pressure on fee rates? This is an area of the fund space that's seen less pressure than equities and fixed income over the last decade or two.

David, I would not describe what's been happening as turbulence. I would regard it, frankly, as opportunity. You're right. The money market funds have reached record levels, essentially rounding to $8 trillion, making new highs pretty much each quarter. We're in that business from lots of different angles. I think it's worth reflecting on it for a second because we're there with our Dreyfus Money Market Fund. It's a large fund. Again, rounding, call it $450 billion. That's a significant participation. We're also participating with our LiquidityDirect business, our collateral businesses, our custody businesses, and our trustee businesses. This is another example of an industry which we touch very broadly across all of our different platforms. Now there's an evolution, and we're talking about on-chain capabilities for money market funds. I don't view that as turbulence for them. I view that as a technological evolution.

The question is, do we have platforms that can serve that technological evolution? The answer is yes, because of our investment in digital assets. Our ability to help manage that transition from traditional money market funds to a more digital asset money market fund is something that we've clearly set out that we can do. That's not dissimilar to the mutual funds, to ETF, to separate accounts' evolution of market structure. It's not threatening when market structures evolve unless you can't catch the next evolution. We've invested to be able to catch it. On top of that, we now have stable coins. You're right, they can be a competitor to a money market fund, but they're very similar to a money market fund. Essentially, it's a collection of high-quality assets, but they have the additional feature of mobility.

We are in the mobility business because we have our treasury services businesses, our clearing businesses, and our collateral management businesses. Being in the transaction mobility business actually gives us a new feature that doesn't exist for money market funds because they aren't mobile assets. We're quite excited about this evolution. This is the philosophy of our strategy, to say, where are the megatrends? Are we set up with our platforms to be able to capitalize on that evolution? Have we invested properly? Critically, do we have the breadth of range of services that allow us to touch those evolutions from multiple perspectives?

Thank you. Dermot, I think you said that almost half of the servicing wins in the quarter were multi-line of business solutions. Can you help us frame how that compares to 2024, to the first half of this year?

I don't have a crisp number for it because over time, we're kind of, as with the commercial model being a year old, we're building out the telemetry to be able to track that more and more. Going forward, we'll be more sophisticated in how we communicate these metrics to you. We started to track it this year, and we didn't go back last year or the year before and track it back then because it's a lot of manual work to do going back in time. The trend is there. We just see the cross-selling. As we've both talked about a number of times, the bringing together of the firm under the commercial leadership of Katinka is really driving a very powerful transformation. We're more connected, and that's what I would say.

Just directionally, would you say it's somewhat higher or a lot higher? It's hard to really put a frame on it.

I would say it's higher. Much higher is probably too strong, but I would say it's meaningfully higher in terms of when we talked about last year. We had WisdomTree, which we sold four lines of business to one client, and this year we're kind of seeing more and more of the WisdomTree-type solutions being delivered to existing clients, whereas last year, WisdomTree was a new new client. We're delivering more to existing clients, which is a core part of the strategy.

Our next question comes from Alex Blostein with Goldman Sachs.

Thank you. Hey, Robin. Hi, Dermot. Good morning. I wanted to ask you guys about operating leverage over time. Obviously, really strong progress this year, continued in the third quarter, and I acknowledge the fact that margin expansion is both a function of revenues and expense controls and efficiencies. As you look out and you sort of point into a lot of the efficiency gains from the platforms will come through towards maybe the end of 2027 and 2028. Plus, you've got the variety of AI efficiencies underway as well. As you think about firm-wide margin in this kind of mid-30% year-to-date, and as you think about the forward opportunity set, where do you guys think this could land, understanding that you might not want to set a firm target on this call, but helpful just to kind of hear your thoughts on how you would frame that?

Okay. There were a few questions rolled up into that one. When we take a reflection, and if you're going to go back and timestamp it from the Goldman Conference of Fall Conference of 2022 to now, over the last nearly three years, we've consistently delivered positive operating leverage and in some cases have outperformed. I think this is our fifth or sixth quarter of consistent positive operating leverage that we've delivered. This really is kind of, I go back to this whole notion of the flywheel of the three pillars that Robin has laid out in terms of be more for clients, run our company better, and power our culture. When you get 50,000 people working in harmony and pulling together to deliver on that, that is what is really creating the outperformance. We're very pleased. Each quarter is just another sign of steady execution.

It is a flywheel of momentum that's powered by culture. If you take, we studied all the peer group over the last 15 years, and we said, what's been the average positive operating leverage of the firms? Best in class was 150 bps of positive operating leverage. Over the last three years, we've consistently beaten that. Internally, we feel like in some ways we're still in early innings. When Robin wrote his first shareholder letter, he was taking the decade-long view of what our strategy was going to be. If you take the decade view, we're three years into that. You would say relatively early innings in all the things that we're doing. When you take the two transformation projects that we've both double-clicked on, commercial model and platform operating model, we really haven't talked about what we want to do in the product and innovation space.

We've recently hired Carolyn Weinberg to stand up and lead that business. We expect Carolyn to have the same success as Cathinka's had over the last couple of years. We really haven't factored in the opportunities both in growth and in efficiency that AI is going to bring to the firm over time. We will be quite optimistic about our ability to deliver these kinds of returns into the future.

Great. That's very helpful. My second or the follow-up question, rather, just to clean up around NII. I believe in the past, you guys sort of talked about that internally, you're sort of trying to focus on 2026 and trying to neutralize the balance sheet to sort of headwinds from lower interest rates. Just curious if that's still the case. If you think about Q4 guide, is that a reasonable jumping-off point for NII for all of 2026, again, assuming you guys can succeed at keeping them roughly flat?

I think we were quite pleased last year in terms of how we set up the balance sheet for this year in terms of what we call the Jackson Hole pivot. We did a lot of work over the summer months of 2024 to kind of deliver the results that you're now seeing in 2025. We've replicated that thinking and that model and that kind of proactive repositioning of the balance sheet for 2026. We've done a lot of work, and we've done a lot of positioning. To your specific, the latter part of your question, I would say Q4 is a good jumping-off point as a base case for 2026.

We'll take our next question from Ken Usdin with Autonomous.

Hey, guys. How are you doing? Good morning. I just wanted to ask, it's more of a longer-term question, but obviously, so many announcements out of the crypto and the stablecoin space in terms of new products and new offerings from both BNY and the industry. I'm just wondering how you're starting to think about what's the TAM there from a revenue perspective for BNY. You know, like what is the opportunity set? We see it in terms of the notionals out there in the marketplace. How does that convert into revenue for BK? Where would you expect it to come through? Is there any perspective on like when that starts to show?

Sure, Ken. Look, we're playing the long game on digital assets. We started this journey really about three years ago, seeing it as a potentially interesting technology. Clearly, it had some very excited fans right at that stage. It has built and become, I think, a bit more mainstream accepted as a technology. We saw the promise of the technology. Look, we've been in the technology evolution business for a long time. We still have some of our ledgers, which were quill and ink back in the day. Then it was printing, and then it was computers. Now we see this as a promise for certain types of assets and certain types of transactions as being a new way of being able to record, improving the mobility of assets, improving the efficiency of recording transactions, etc., etc. We see that promise of that technology, and we've invested accordingly.

It's quite broad because yes, it's stablecoins, but yes, it's digital asset custody. We can custody. We're the first U.S. GSIP to be able to natively custody Bitcoin and other digital assets. It's also this whole mobility conversation that we've talked about, which we think is quite exciting. It is more than stablecoins, but we are a big supporter of the stablecoin ecosystem. Interestingly, having really lent into this ecosystem earlier on, we became a real go-to partner for many of these firms for our traditional services because they were like, "Hey, BNY, you get it. Let's do we need all of these traditional services. We need capabilities around transfer agency and custody and on-ramps and off-ramps, asset management in order to be able to provide those services." We've really attached ourselves to those clients. Now we're participating in the next evolution. We're in the rails business.

We're in the financial markets, enablement business, global capital markets. There are a variety of different things. If you combine our clearing capabilities, our collateral capabilities, our mobility capabilities in money movements together, that is able to help stablecoin prospects be able to go faster. It's a very interesting space. It's very early days. This is a multi-year thing. We're positioned for optionality is the way that I would describe it.

Okay. Got it. All right. A follow-up on the expense side, Alex asked earlier about operating leverage. I just want to confirm, 3% full-year expense growth implies more of a 2% year-over-year in the fourth quarter. I'm not suggesting that means there's a lot of variability quarter to quarter in terms of how you grow expenses. Is the platforming starting to help at all in terms of either allowing you to have more growth saves underneath that, so you can even better control the overall growth rate of expenses as you contemplate leverage? I know you've said earlier in the year that if revenues are better, it's always a good time to spend. Just directional thoughts on how to think about underlying expense growth. Thanks.

I wouldn't say I said exactly what you just said there. I think given the markets are more constructive, I wouldn't be an advocate of spending for the sake of spending because revenues are up. Hopefully, we've earned the credibility of all of you that over the last few years, we're very good stewards of both our capital and our expense base. We're disciplined in how we allocate our expense budget. I think with the backdrop being more constructive this year, we've accelerated some investments. With the change in administration and everything going on in the digital asset space, we've brought forward some of our investments that previously might have fallen below the line. We've scaled and gone faster in some of those areas.

Importantly, what I would say is, this year we went into the year thinking that we were going to generate about $500 million of efficiency throughout the firm in terms of running the company better. We've redeployed that $500 million into growth investments. We just had our board here this week, and they were kind of always asking the question, are we investing enough? With the market where it is today, should we be doing more? As we go into the planning season for 2026 and beyond, we're taking a very broad-based look on how we can drive positive operating leverage into the future, which is on our star, and generate savings while at the same time deploying. Specifically, on your question of we feel good about the guide of 3%, which in the context of the last three years, 2022 was up 8%, 2023 was 2.7%.

Last year was roughly flat. This year, we guided at the start 1%-2%. Now, with the backdrop of revenue-related expenses and a couple of other initiatives that we've embarked upon, we revised our guide up middle of year to around 3%. We feel very good about where that is. Overall, I think given where we are in inflation, etc., and the CapEx associated with AI, we feel very good about what we've managed to accomplish this year.

We'll move to our next question from Ebrahim Poonawala with Bank of America.

Good morning. I just had a couple of follow-up questions. Robin, I think going back to the digital assets piece, appreciating still early days, would you say if the move towards on-chain tokenization picks up, is it disruptive from revenue margins for BNY, accretive, or just a client retention tool where you are more likely to retain the clients who want to move? I'm just wondering, in that spectrum, is it a bigger risk factor, or is there a tangible revenue opportunity tied to this?

Oh, there's certainly tangible revenue opportunity. Of course, you know, like any market structure change or new technology that comes along, there's disruption risk if you stick your head in the sand and do nothing about it and sort of wish it to be away or ignore it. I think that's true and has been true over generations of changes in financial markets. We view this as a change in circumstance for certain types of assets and for certain types of activity. It's probably more suited for some things than others. Remember, take something like loans as an example. You know, loans are pretty clunky. We're a big loan administrator. We provide huge solutions to CLOs and to other market participants for the loans business.

If you just look at it as part of our $15 trillion worth of corporate trustee, they're a pretty clunky instrument to actually manage in the post-trade space. They're quite bespoke, customized. There's a lot of servicing associated with them. To be able to see digital assets tokenization come along, we actually see opportunities for greater efficiency in markets like that. Now, it's going to be hard, not impossible, but it's going to be hard in a traditional equity, traditional clean government bond to be able to create a whole lot more efficiency. That's probably where digital assets create more mobility, 24/7 types of liquidity.

It's either going to make markets more efficient, which we kind of like because we're such a scale player, or it can open up new opportunities to be able to trade certain assets 24/7, to be able to convert from collateral into individual securities, into individual cash all over the course of seconds in the middle of the night. That's pretty exciting. That mobility, increased mobilization, because we are in the transaction business as well, not just in the storage business, we see opportunities to benefit from that. Look, we're eyes wide open on this. There could be places in our business where margins can be pressured on the revenue side by certain things, but then there are also opportunities on the revenue side. We think on the efficiency side, there's plenty to participate. This is about culture. It's about attitude. It's about investing.

We've hired our first Chief Product and Innovation Officer in the form of Carolyn Weinberg. She's a deep expert in the space in digital assets. She's done significant things in this space for other companies in her past. Now she's here, and she's innovating for us. I would say net-net, pretty excited about it, but also eyes wide open about the fact that with change, you've got to get it right.

Got it. That's helpful. I guess just a separate question, very narrowly on how you're thinking about share buybacks. I mean, it's an asset-light model. Do you care about the dilution buybacks have on book value at these levels, or is any of, sort of, when you think about just from a valuation perspective, is that influencing your appetite for buying back stock, or is it still relatively unchanged today versus a year ago?

I would say broadly, the latter is relatively unchanged compared to a year ago. We started out the year guiding ±100%. This hasn't been the year I think that most market participants thought it would be in January. We tend to run on the conservative side of things. You'll see it at 92%, and that's really born out of more of a conservative bias to running at the higher end of our tier one leverage ratio, given the market turbulence, the geopolitics, etc. I think I said in my prepared remarks that we will be in the 90%-100% for the full year. Just as a broader matter, you pointed it out, Ebrahim, we're a capital-light business model. If we don't see opportunities to deploy in excess of our cost of capital, we will return it to shareholders as they would expect.

Look, Ebrahim, when we look at our business, and we've talked about this all across the call in our prepared remarks in the Q&A, we're excited about the journey that we're on. Yes, we're a year into the commercial model. Yes, we're a year away from finishing just the implementation of the platform's operating model. Twelve to eighteen months after that is when we'd expect to be having the run rate benefits of that. We're right at the beginning of the AI journey, but we see a lot of runway. For us, we sit here internally, and we're pleased, of course, with the progress of the company. We're pleased with the stock price.

When we look at the runway, it doesn't feel to us like it's the type of environment where you'd say, "Oh, my goodness, we should stop buying back, and it's overpriced." It doesn't feel like that to us. This feels like an opportunity for runway. We certainly don't feel like we've reached the end of the road.

We'll take our next question from Betsy Graseck with Morgan Stanley.

Hello. Can you hear me? Okay. Thank you. Robin, is that because how many more years of positive operating leverage do you anticipate you're going to be able to deliver here? Maybe that's part of what you're seeing in the outlook for the stock price versus what the market's seeing. That would be helpful to understand, especially given the fact that part of your operating leverage has been delivered by headcount reduction. Clearly, you know, at this pace, can't go on forever, obviously. A little bit of color there would be helpful.

The good news is there's a big difference between forever and for a long time. We see, look, the short answer is when we look at the inputs, and we used to talk about this a year or two ago when we didn't have any outputs at that time to be able to talk to you all about. We only talked to you about the inputs, but we tried to be very transparent with what those inputs were. Now we can talk about the outputs because we've got delivery and value that's coming out of all of the work that our teams have been doing over the past three years.

We still talk about the inputs for exactly this reason, because we want to try to give you all the transparency on the fact that we're still putting a lot of new things in, and there's still a lot of runway associated with the value that's going to come out of those. The commercial model is a great example, which is why we keep reiterating it. It's only one year of maturity. When you look at the combination of how you bring all of our sales folks together, new rhythms, embedding them in the company, plus the fact that we've got this full breadth that I answered to Mike's first question, all of these different platforms and the nature of them, we feel that as that matures, there's a lot of runway on sales. Platform's operating model is not just an efficiency play, as we've told you before.

It is very much creating an increased speed and agility to be able to deliver for clients as well. If you add 12-18 months to something that we won't have finished implementing until towards the end of next year, you get into 2028 before you actually would expect to have the full run rate, agility benefits, operating type rhythms, which then allows us to be going full speed in terms of the technology, the processes, and the reimagining of things, because platforms are very much a means to an end. We look at all of that. We look at the broadening out. We look at the fact that we've improved by about 10% the contribution of pre-tax income from platforms businesses, which are naturally higher in margin than the rest of the company. That's accretive. Investments and wealth hasn't really kicked in yet to the margin party.

There's opportunity there. Dermot talked about that in his prepared remarks. We look around. As Dermot said earlier on, we've taken a decade view of this right from the beginning. We're only at year three, and we've got all of these inputs. For us, we sit here, and I think our teams sit here kind of excited about the fact that we feel like we're still early innings and we're just getting going. That is sort of where we sit right now. That is how it feels in the company. Again, just talking about the inputs that in theory are meant to create. So far, our track record is that we've been able to do this, create the outputs of the future.

Just a follow-up question here is on stablecoin. Do you plan on issuing a BNY stablecoin?

We're not going to get into very specific situations about future products. I would just pull you back to the broader comment, Betsy, which is we are in the infrastructure capital markets enablement business. We're in the rails business.

We partner with stablecoins. We enable other people's stablecoins. That is really the heart of our strategy: to enable our clients with their transition into these ecosystems. We support the biggest stablecoin issuers today. There are many people who are interested in launching stablecoins. We really have the complete set of services to be able to power them. What I would expect to see over time is participants who are wanting to do their own versions of using stablecoins internally to be able to operate their companies, but they will not have the scale or the interest in creating all the infrastructure. They are going to turn to other stablecoin providers, and they are going to turn to partners to be able to power their own use of those things. I think that is the sweet spot of how we think about the business opportunity.

Bank of New York (BNY) (BNY) Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Company Participants