With a combined revenue of $21 trillion and $2.1 trillion in profits, the 2026 Fortune 500 is the definitive list of America's largest companies.

Fortune 500

AI is a major force shaping this year’s list—but it’s far from the only story.

World's Most Admired Companies

Almost $20 trillion in revenue—and a record-breaking $1.87 trillion in profits. Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive list of the biggest companies in America.

Leaders in all industries rely more than ever on Big Tech—and appreciate the giants that deliver, at scale, without drama.

Industries included in the sector are diversified, electronics, and food and grocery.

Fortune Sector Leaders: Wholesalers

The Fortune 500, in its 70th year in 2024, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

The 26th edition of the list shows how much esteem Big Tech giants command among other business leaders.

The 25th Fortune World’s Most Admired Companies list suggests that tech giants’ peers respect them as much as ever.

The Fortune 500, in its 69th year in 2023, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

Just as it dominates our economy, Big Tech now dominates Fortune’s annual ranking of corporate reputation.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 68th running of the list.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 67th running of the list.

F500-2021-168-Avnet

Founded by Charles Avnet in 1921, the company today is one of the world's leaders in manufacturing electronic components that can be used for improving autonomous vehicles' power efficiency and Lidar detection. The company also offers a wide range of technology services to help with processes like supply chain, logistics, and software.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 66th running of the list.

F500-2020-169-Avnet

This distributor and retailer of tech components and IT services was founded in 1921 and is headquartered in Phoenix.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2019 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 65th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 64th running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2017 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune Global 500 generated $27.7 trillion in revenues and $1.5 trillion in profits.

Fortune Global 500

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 63rd running of the list.

Here are the World's Most Admired Companies for 2016 as ranked in their industries. See who made the list.

This year's Fortune Global 500 generated $27.6 trillion in revenues and $1.5 trillion in profits.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 62nd running of the list.

Business insiders have spoken: Asked which companies they most admire, more than 4,100 executives, directors, and analysts chose these top 50 All-Stars.

The world's 500 largest companies generated $31.2 trillion in revenues and $1.7 trillion in profits in 2014. Together, this year's Fortune Global 500 employ 65 million people worldwide and are represented by 36 countries.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 61st running of the list. Wal-Mart claims the top spot again. See who made the list.

Global business is back. After limping through a worldwide financial crisis and economic slowdown, the 500 largest companies ranked by revenues shattered all sorts of performance records in 2013: They racked up combined revenues of $31.1 trillion, up 2.5% from 2012, and profits soared 27% to nearly $2 trillion. China’s 95 companies (up from 89 last year) posted $5.8 trillion in revenues. The U.S. has four fewer companies on the list than last year but remains (for now) the country leader, with 128 corporations on the list—including No. 1 Wal-Mart Stores—reporting $8.6 trillion in revenues. 

Wal-Mart stayed on top as its sales crept closer to half-a-trillion dollars. Apple moved into the top five. And UnitedHealth Group continued its steady climb. 

Key Financials (last Fiscal Year)

Revenues ($M)

Profits ($M)

Assets ($M)

Total Stockholder Equity ($M)

Profit Ratios

Profit as % of Revenues

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholder Equity

Sector

Industry

Current All-Star Rank

Previous All-Star Rank

Industry Rank

Previous Industry Rank

Overall Score

Innovation

People Management

Use of Corporate Assets

Social Responsibility

Quality of Management

Financial Soundness

Long-Term Investment Value

Quality of Products/Services

Global Competitiveness

Earnings Per Share (last Fiscal Year)

Earnings Per Share ($)

EPS % Change (from prior fiscal year)

EPS % Change (5 year annual rate)

EPS % Change (10 year annual rate)

Total Return

Total Return to Investors (last year)

Total Return to Investors (5 year, annualized)

Total Return to Investors (10 year, annualized)

Avnet is a distributor of electronic components and an electronic solutions provider. The company serves a wide range of clients in the automotive, medical, defense, aerospace, telecommunications, and industrial sectors. Founded in 1921, the company operates in 140 countries across North America, Europe, and Asia.

Q4 2026

Q3 2026

Q2 2026

Q1 2026

Q4 2025

Q3 2025

Q2 2025

Avnet (AVT): Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings

legacy

Avnet

avnet

Welcome to the Avnet Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 earnings call. I would now like to turn the floor over to Lisa Mueller, Director of Investor Relations for Avnet. Please go ahead.     

Thank you, operator. I'd like to welcome everyone to Avnet's Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 earnings conference call. This morning, Avnet released financial results for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2026, and the release is available on the investor relations section of Avnet's website, along with a slide presentation, which you may access at your convenience. As a reminder, some of the information contained in the news release and on this conference call contain forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Such forward-looking statements are not a guarantee of performance, and the company's actual results could differ materially from those contained in such statements. Several factors that could cause or contribute to such differences are described in detail in Avnet's most recent Form 10-Q and 10-K and subsequent filings with the SEC.

These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this presentation, and the company undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements or supply new information regarding the circumstances after the date of this presentation. Please note, unless otherwise stated, all results provided will be non-GAAP measures. The full non-GAAP to GAAP reconciliation can be found in the press release issued today, as well as in the appendix slides of today's presentation, and posted on the investor relations website. Today's call will be led by Phil Gallagher, Avnet's CEO, and Ken Jacobson, Avnet's CFO. With that, let me turn the call over to Phil Gallagher. Phil? 

Thank you, Lisa, and thank you everyone for joining us on our fourth quarter and fiscal year 2026 earnings call. I am very pleased to report an exceptional finish to fiscal 2026. The fourth quarter results that came in well above our expectations and capped a year of strong performance and meaningful progress for Avnet. We delivered a record quarter across all key metrics in both our Electronic Components and Farnell businesses, supported by improving demand across all of our core markets, strong execution by our teams, and expanded margins from the operating leverage inherent in our business model. For the full fiscal year, Avnet delivered substantial revenue, margin, and earnings growth as market conditions improved and our team remained focused on execution in areas we can control.

Looking back, fiscal 2026 was a year where many of the indicators we have been discussing for several quarters began to translate into stronger results. Book-to-bill has improved, backlog grew, customer demand visibility and ordering patterns strengthened, lead times extended in most product categories, and demand creation activity remained healthy. Just as important, we stayed disciplined on working capital, operating expenses, and capital allocation while continuing to invest in the capabilities that differentiate Avnet in the market. Throughout the year, we continued to demonstrate the value we bring at the center of the technology supply chain. We strengthened supplier relationships, supported customers through a more complex demand environment, and expanded our technical and digital capabilities. We also ensured that we are well-positioned to participate in several end markets that are demonstrating high growth potential or are already showing high growth in electronic components demand. 

I want to thank our employees around the world for their hard work and commitment. These results reflect the experience, resilience, and dedication of our team. Now, turning to the recently completed fourth quarter. It was a record quarter for Avnet that exceeded our sales and EPS guidance. We achieved record sales of $8.3 billion and an adjusted operating margin of 3.8%, highlighted by an electronic components operating margin of 4% and a 9% operating margin at Farnell. We also improved inventory days to 71, the lowest level in nearly four years, and believe we have the capacity to continue improving in fiscal 2027. The sales improvement we saw was broad-based. We are excited not only by the magnitude of the growth, but the breadth of the recovery across all regions and end markets.

This gives us confidence that the improvement in demand is not tied to a single end market or trend, but reflects a broader demand recovery across the diverse applications that require electronic components. The supply environment continued to tighten during the quarter, with lead times moving higher across most of the component categories we track for both semiconductor, interconnect, passive, and electromechanical, or IP&E products. What initially appeared to be demand concentrated around AI and data center-related deployments has broadened considerably, with extended lead times now evident across a wider range of applications and end markets. As the quarter progressed, pricing increases became more prevalent beyond memory. We expect additional price increases from a number of semiconductor and IP&E suppliers in the months ahead. Artificial intelligence continues to be an important catalyst for the industry and for Avnet, but we believe the improving demand environment is broader than AI alone.

While we benefit from sales into data center applications and technologies that support AI infrastructure, we are also seeing positive effects across our diversified end markets. Investments being made to support AI are accelerating demand for power management, connectivity, automation, and other enabling technologies across a wide range of applications. That impact is increasing semiconductor and component content across the broader markets we serve. We also see new demand from customers that are deploying AI at the edge. These customers are in our industrial sweet spot, which we are well-positioned to serve. Robotics, drones, and autonomous systems The early stages of adoption, but each application requires a combination of sensing, connectivity, embedded computing, power, and thermal management. These are areas where our supplier line card engineering resources, global scale, and supply chain expertise create meaningful value. Now with that, let me turn to the highlights for our businesses.   

Our electronic components business delivered another record sales quarter. All three regions grew double digits year-over-year and sequentially. Sales growth was the highest in the Americas, marking its fourth consecutive quarter of year-on-year growth. All end markets showed sequential growth. Year-on-year, aerospace and defense, networking, and data center were the strongest end markets. In Asia, sales reached another record high of $3.9 billion, marking our eighth consecutive quarter of year-on-year sales growth in the region. Similar to last quarter, demand increased across all the geographies and end markets we serve, led by data center, transportation, networking, and industrial. In EMEA, sales grew both sequentially and year-on-year for the third consecutive quarter. We are seeing improvement with a mix of higher-performing end markets such as data center and industrial, alongside markets with a somewhat slower growth, like transportation.

We continue to see positive signs, including improved book-to-bills and our expectations that the region will see continued growth in the second half of calendar year 2026. Within Europe, we also continue to see steady improvement in our embedded business, which creates tighter customer relationships and better margins. Customers continue to see the value embedded boards and displays bring as a part of our total solutions offering, helping them solve for their product design requirements. Turning to Farnell. We were pleased with the continued progress in the business. Farnell benefited from improving demand, continued execution against its strategy, and the benefits of leveraging Farnell's digital platform and high service distribution model within Avnet's global relationships and scale. Our Power of One initiatives continue to create opportunities for both organizations, and we are excited by Farnell's trajectory as market conditions improve, particularly in Europe. 

This quarter demonstrated that our model is designed to generate significant profit expansion as we grow the top line. We delivered meaningful margin expansion and earnings growth while managing our operating expenses. We still have ample capacity in our sales, engineering, digital, and distribution infrastructure, and that capacity becomes more valuable as demand improves and market conditions tighten. Our higher-margin IP&E business is another example of how we benefit from complexity, and the fourth quarter was another record quarter for IP&E sales. For the full fiscal year, IP&E sales are approaching $5 billion. As AI infrastructure, industrial automation, robotics, drones, and edge applications expand, customers need more complete technology solutions. Our ability to bring semiconductor and IP&E products together through demand creation, technical support, and supply chain expertise is an important part of our value proposition. 

Our supply chain solutions business continues to build momentum as large OEM customers increasingly turn to us to help navigate complex and evolving supply chains. We are expanding our engagements with a growing number of leading OEMs, particularly in markets such as data center infrastructure, networking, and transportation, where demand trends remain favorable. The strength of our capabilities was recently recognized by General Motors, which named Avnet a 2025 Creative Supplier of the Year, recognizing our relationship, innovation, and supply chain support. This award reinforces the value we bring to customers through our global reach, deep industry expertise, and ability to deliver creative supply chain solutions. Another good example of the differentiated capabilities within our company is Avnet Integrated Solutions, which helps customers bring complete technology solutions to market by providing system assembly, rack integration, configuration, testing, and deployment services globally.

One of its larger customers sells directly into the data center market, and we support that growth through a combination of technology solutions, physical integration, supply chain coordination, and fulfillment capabilities. While this is only one example, it highlights how Avnet creates value beyond traditional component distribution and participates in high-growth areas where complexity is increasing. As I reflect on fiscal 2026, I am proud of what our team accomplished, but I'm also mindful that success in our industry is earned every day. It is earned through reliability, execution, technical expertise, and trusted relationships. That responsibility is something we take very seriously. It is also why I believe our culture matters so much. We have experienced teams who understand the market, stakeholders, and customers and suppliers, and move quickly when conditions change. That consistency is a real advantage for Avnet. Looking ahead, we remain optimistic but grounded.   

Market conditions and demand trends continue to improve. Our book-to-bills in all regions are solidly above one. Our backlog is healthy and extending, giving us better visibility well into fiscal year 2027. Our diversified go-to-market strategies, end markets, and supplier technologies ensure we are well-positioned to benefit from the many of the long-term growth trends shaping the electronics industry. At the center of the technology supply chain, Avnet has never been more relevant. Our capabilities, relationships, and global reach position us to support customers and suppliers as demand strengthens across the markets we serve. We made in fiscal 2026, and are focused on continuing to execute with discipline as we move into fiscal year 2027. With that, I'll turn it over to Ken to dive deeper into our fourth quarter results. Ken?

Thank you, Phil, and good morning, everyone. We appreciate your interest in Avnet. Our sales for the fourth quarter were a record $8.3 billion, above the high end of our guidance range and up 48% year-over-year. On a sequential basis, sales were higher by 17%. Foreign currency did not have a meaningful impact on our sales growth this quarter. Regionally, on a year-over-year basis, sales increased 55% in the Americas, 46% in Asia, and 44% in EMEA. During the fourth quarter, sales from Asia were 47% of total sales, compared to approximately 48% of sales in the year ago quarter. From an operating group perspective, electronic components had record sales during the quarter as sales increased 49% year-over-year and increased 17% sequentially. Farnell also had record sales during the quarter as sales increased 29% year-over-year and 10% sequentially. 

Similar to last quarter, memory prices increased during the quarter. As a result, approximately one third of both the sequential and year-over-year sales growth was attributable to pricing increases in the memory product category. For the fourth quarter, gross profit dollars grew at approximately the same rate as sales growth, or 46% year-over-year. Gross profit margin of 10.4% was up 5 basis points sequentially and was down 14 basis points year-over-year. Electronic components gross profit margin was flat sequentially and down 25 basis points year-over-year. Farnell gross profit margin was up nearly 400 basis points year-over-year and was up over 200 basis points sequentially, primarily due to a better mix of higher margin on the board components. SG&A expenses were $548 million in the quarter, up $96 million year-over-year and $29 million sequentially.

The sequential increase in SG&A is primarily from higher incentive compensation, freight, and logistics costs due to higher sales volumes. Our expense discipline continues to drive our operating leverage. As a percentage of gross profit dollars, SG&A expenses were 63% in the fourth quarter, compared to 70% last quarter and 76% a year ago. SG&A expenses as a percentage of gross profit dollars was even lower for our EC business at 56%, compared to 62% last quarter and 68% a year ago. We expect that our SG&A expenses as a percentage of gross profit will continue to improve to below 60% before the end of fiscal 2027. For the fourth quarter, we reported adjusted operating income of $318 million, and the Avnet adjusted operating margin was 3.8%, an increase of over 70 basis points from last quarter. This represents the fourth consecutive quarter of adjusted operating income margin expansion.

Adjusted operating income also grew approximately 2.6x greater than sales compared to last quarter and last year. We expect to continue to drive operating income growth at approximately twice the rate of sales growth, supported by our disciplined expense management. By operating group, electronic components operating income was $317 million, and EC operating margin was 4.1% in the fourth quarter. The 54 basis point sequential increase in EC operating margin was led by the Americas, with all regions improving their operating margins sequentially and year-over-year. This is EC's third consecutive quarter of operating margin expansion and is the highest EC operating margin in more than two years. Farnell operating income was $45 million, and their operating income margin was 9%, which was up nearly 400 basis points from last quarter.  

This is the highest Farnell operating margin in over three years and is their seventh consecutive quarter of operating margin expansion. Farnell continues to be on track to reach double-digit operating margins before the end of fiscal 2027. Turning to expenses below operating income, fourth quarter interest expense was $66 million, and our adjusted effective income tax rate was 23%, both consistent with expectations. Adjusted diluted earnings per share of $2.28 was a quarterly record for our company and was well above the high end of our guidance. Adjusted diluted earnings per share grew 3.8x greater than sales compared to last year and grew 3.3x greater than sales compared to last quarter. Near term, we expect EPS to continue growing at approximately 3x as fast as sales, driven by sales growth and expanded operating margins. Turning to the balance sheet and liquidity.

During the quarter, working capital increased $559 million sequentially, primarily due to an increase in accounts receivable driven by the $1.2 billion growth in sales. Working capital days decreased seven days quarter-over-quarter to 69 days. From an inventory perspective, inventory days improved to 71 days from 77 days last quarter. Our EC inventory days improved to below 65 days, and Farnell inventory days improved to below 200 days. We expect inventory days to continue to improve for EC, but we expect Farnell inventory to remain around 200 days, reflecting the business's typical inventory turn profile of two turns per year. Inventory dollars grew 11%, or $600 million. Similar to the impact pricing had on sales, more than 50% of the inventory increase was driven by pricing, and substantially all of that was memory-related. Inventory net of accounts payable decreased by $821 million compared to last quarter.   

Inventory remains a fundamental driver of our business. We will continue to focus on making necessary inventory investments to position us to capture the growth opportunities we see in the markets we serve. We ended the quarter with a return on working capital of 19%, exceeding our near-term target of 16%. Continually improving our return on working capital will remain a key priority for us coming to the new fiscal year. In the fourth quarter, we used $291 million of cash flow from operations to support $1.2 billion of sequential sales growth. We anticipate using cash in the first quarter to continue supporting the sales growth, primarily in the form of accounts receivable. With regards to our capital allocation, in the near term, we expect to prioritize funding our accelerating growth and supporting our dividend. Cash used for capital expenditures was $17 million during the quarter.

We are making progress towards our leverage target of approximately 3x, which we expect to achieve by the end of the calendar year. We ended the fourth quarter with a gross leverage of 3.2x, down from 3.6x in the third quarter, and with approximately $1.2 billion of available committed borrowing capacity. For the fiscal year, we returned $138 million to shareholders from share repurchases, representing 3.2% of shares outstanding. We also returned $114 million to shareholders in dividends, including $29 million for the quarter. Turning to the first quarter guidance. We are guiding sales in the range of $9 billion-$9.3 billion and adjusted diluted earnings per share in the range of $2.80-$2.90. Our first quarter guidance assumes current market conditions persist and implies a sequential sales increase of approximately 10% at the midpoint. 

This guidance also assumes similar interest expense compared to the previous quarter, an effective tax rate of between 21% and 25%, 85 million shares outstanding on a diluted basis. I want to thank our team for driving a solid quarter and fiscal year of improved financial results. We have great momentum coming into the new fiscal year, and we continue to position ourselves to be able to capitalize on the growth opportunities ahead and to continue to achieve new records for both sales as well as earnings in the coming quarters. With that, I will turn it over to operator to open it up for questions. Operator?

We will now be conducting a question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star two if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. Thank you. Our first question is from Joe Quatrochi with Wells Fargo.

Thanks for taking the question. I was wondering if you could just talk a little bit more about the pricing dynamics that you're seeing. What's kind of embedded in the guide from a memory pricing change perspective? On the reported results, can you help us just understand what was the impact on the memory pricing from an EBIT perspective on a sequential year-over-year basis, relative to, I think you said it was about a third of the revenue growth? 

Thanks, Joe. I'll start and then turn it over to Ken for some of the percentages as well. Thanks. Well, as a general statement, even outside of memory, we're starting to see a broader expansion of price increases across other commodities. We mentioned that last quarter as the lead times continue to extend, are forecasted to extend, we'll start seeing some ASP inflation. It's pretty broad. Not across the board everywhere, but it's pretty broad. A lot of times the question, does it impact our margins or impact our GP dollars? A lot of times, we pass the pricing through to the customer. We don't typically mark it up beyond that price increase. We get some ASP upside, and maybe some GP dollar upside, but not necessarily in percent, if you will. To date, most of it has really been in memory.

Starting this quarter, end of last quarter, this quarter, we'll start to hit other areas. There's other parts of the portfolio, Joe, you got to remember that are still price negotiations, they got some deflation there too. It's not all inflation. There is some deflation happening as well. Ken, you want to-

I would say, just to reemphasize what Phil said, I think we would see that there's other price increases happening or being announced, but they're much more modest than what we saw in memory. I would say the guide assumes modest or minor price increases, going into next quarter. We'll continue to monitor the situation and give clarity there.

From a how much did it impact EBIT or operating income, we would say about a third of that GP dollar growth also came from pricing, there wasn't any meaningful difference between the sales impact and the GP dollar impact. I think just in general, I think our operating income dollars, our GP dollars dropped through about 2.6x. Think about it as the operating leverage benefited not only from the volume growth but also from the pricing in roughly the same mix as that we saw in the GP dollars.

Okay. Maybe, I think I heard you say greater than 50% of the increase in inventory was more or less related to kind of pricing of the inventory or pricing of the mix.

Can you talk about just, like, the unit increase of inventory, how do we think about the unit increase of inventory as we start to look into fiscal 2027 or into the September quarter?

Yeah, that's right. About half of the increase came from pricing, specifically memory. Again, some of that's just timing differences, right? In terms of when we got product and things of that nature. I think in general, you're going to need more units to support the higher volumes, but we're turning it faster. I think our commentary was you'd expect to continue to see some improvement, at least in the EC business, on the inventory days as we continue to increase our working capital velocity. I think the inventory is as healthy as it's been. No real problems in terms of even some of the stuff that was kind of excess is kind of freed up. We're in really good shape, I think, from a quality of inventory and continue to see things get tighter, right? 

As things get tighter, we want to make sure we've got inventory on the shelves to take advantage of that opportunity as lead times extend.

Yeah, Joe, just to go, we work with all of our customers in the forecasting, as well as obviously balancing that with our suppliers' needs and bounce that back and forth. From a unit standpoint, we're in good shape. From an inventory standpoint, to Ken's point, the inventory is healthy. We're constantly, though, meeting with our suppliers to be sure we got the right positioning of their inventory, of the top runners as well, and we track it in with many suppliers in the weeks of inventory. Okay? We're still investing in inventory big time, as a matter of fact, it's very critical, and working that balance with the suppliers. I do know in Farnell, where we said the inventory days improved as well, the SKU count actually year-on-year is up somewhere around 2%-3%. We'll continue to add inventory there.

This might be a different mix and broader, which is what we want for the high service business.

Our next question is from William Stein with Truist Securities.

Great. Thanks for taking my questions. Congrats on the very good results and the huge guidance you're providing.

Phil, I'm hoping you can talk to us a little bit about sort of the positioning in the cycle, right? You just posted revenue up, I don't know, about 34% year-over-year. It's the fourth quarter of year-over-year growth. What inning would you say we're in?

Thanks, Will, for the comments, first off. That's a tough one to call. We're going to fourth quarter, actually almost 50% year-on-year this quarter. It was 34% last quarter growth. If I evaluate for Asia, it's eight quarters, Will, which is extended already, right? Still looking very bright. It's tough to call. I'd say we're, and it depends on the supplier you talk to, but for the most part, or the customers, it feels like maybe in the third or fourth inning, maybe. Something along those lines, if I were going to put it in baseball terms. For sure not the eighth inning. I would probably say it's in the front third of the baseball game, yeah. The third, fourth inning. 

It's analogies, so don't hold me to exactly what inning, but I think it gives you a little bit of what we're seeing from a backlog, bookings, et cetera. It just seems like it's going to last for a little while.

Okay. Maybe the other thing I'd like to look at is the margin performance. I think you explained why gross margins. I mean, they were up sequentially, but maybe a little bit disappointing considering the magnitude of the upside, why that wouldn't have sort of flowed through to better results. I think what you've said is that price increases have a sort of deflationary effect on that. As we progress through the cycle, where should we anticipate gross and operating margins traveling to and maybe settling out? I think historically you've talked about a 5% or greater than 5% operating margin target. You're still nowhere near that, really. You've gotten close before. How should we think about expansion over the next few quarters? 

Yeah. Well, I guess the short answer to your question would be continued steady progress. I think if you look at the past four quarters, 30 basis points this quarter with about 60 basis points expansion, specifically on EC. In general, I think we can expect to continue to see some modest uptick in Farnell's gross margins as they get a higher mix of on the board components. For EC, that answer partially depends on where the growth is coming from. We've seen good progress on operating margin because the West, Europe, and the Americas has recovered, but Asia's still going really strong. That regional mix still has an impact on gross margin. I would temper any expectations for expansion of gross margin on EC, but continued steady progress in that historical range we've seen over the past year. I think the guidance would imply that progress.

Obviously, the target is continuous improvement, working towards five. Will, as we've been saying, we need the West to get stronger, and that's starting to happen, which is great. The Americas, we're seeing improvement in top line and bottom line as well as in Europe, which is really good news. That's our most profitable region. Of course, as Ken mentioned, Farnell really accelerated to 9% operating margin. They get that to 10, 11, 12, that should happen and we'll see where it plays out. 

By the way, I want to correct myself. I think you corrected me though, Phil. I was looking at my old model to look at year-over-year growth. You're right, 47 you just posted, and maybe the fifth quarter of expansion, and you're guiding to even better. That's great, I want to see if I can ask one more, please.

In December, I think total company revenue growth is typically down a couple percentage points. I know you're not guiding more than a quarter out. As we think about where we are in the cycle, and as we think about price increases, is it reasonable for us to think December comes in at seasonal, above, or is there any concern that maybe there's double ordering or customers trying to get ahead and that there could be a pause in December? What's your current thinking as to what might drive a variance between typical and this December.

Thanks, Will. I would never correct you, Will. Firstly, the word typical, that's what we talk about internally, too. It's our typical seasonality, go back and look at it. It's kind of everything's been somewhat thrown out the door on typical anymore because even since COVID. Looking at the numbers now, even last year, December quarter was rather strong for us. You are right. Historically, December quarter would be stronger in Asia, weaker in the West, and you have a mixed issue. [That's herself]. Yeah, and just like Chinese New Year last year, or Lunar New Year in March quarter, we grew in Asia back for the first time, significantly in the March quarter. This whole historical typical is really tough to call.

As you see it right now, as you look at without guiding, but if we look at the backlog and the book-to-bills and what we're talking to the teams about, December's actually looking pretty healthy, but without giving an exact guide. It's actually looking pretty good.   

I'd say better than seasonal, but probably not double-digit sequential growth.

Our next question is from Ruplu Bhattacharya with Bank of America.

Hi, thanks for taking my questions. Phil, America's revenue increased 28% sequentially, and looks like it was materially faster than EMEA and Asia. Can you talk about what were some of the factors that drove that regional divergence, and how much came from memory and data center? It just seems that that region had just outsized kind of growth this quarter. Can you just comment on that? 

Yeah, sure, Ruplu. Thanks. Yeah, really nice performance in Americas. In all the regions, actually. Yes, it did outgrow Asia, but you also got to remember, Asia's had 8+ quarters in a row of year-on-year accelerated growth. They're kind of going against their own compares a little bit, right? With Americas, I think it's four quarters now. If you look at it's really diverse in the verticals, Ruplu, which is healthy, which is good. It's actually, no, it's not a ton of data center. Actually, that's relatively small for us here directly into the data center. We enjoy more of that business in Asia Pac. But even there, it's maybe 10%-15% of the total business for us at the corporate level, so directly into the data center. All the verticals, as I'm looking at them, as we're talking, we're up.

We saw increase in industrial, nicely, by the way. Aerospace was up almost 40%-45% year-on-year to aerospace and defense. The comms were up. Compute transportation was even up, which is predominantly automotive, and even, although it's small, we saw an increase in consumer. Just say the diversification of the market, and really the industrial and defense leading the way from a revenue standpoint and a growth standpoint, which makes sense, unfortunately, in defense era with what's going on in the world, and we have a strong position there with a dedicated business unit for that vertical. And then industrial, partially getting some acceleration with the data center. I know we talk about that, the AI halo kind of thing, and that ecosystem around the data center and the hyperscale and the growth there is going to drive growth in the industrial and EMS providers.

Whether it's cooling, everything that they need to power data centers fall right into a lot of our industrial markets where we have a very strong position. It's no magic. Ken, anything on the-

I'd just say there's nothing different, inherently different. Americas benefited from memory pricing just like the rest of the regions, but there was nothing inherently different in the Americas versus the other regions in terms of memory. Again, that's helping in the growth rates, but it helped all the other regions as well. 

Okay. All right. Thanks for all the details there. For my follow-up, Ken, can I ask you to unpack a little bit on the revenue guide for $9 billion-$9.3 billion? How much is memory pricing, and how much are you factoring in unit volumes? How sensitive is the outlook to each? Book-to-bill is well above parity, you said, and lead times are increasing. Is there evidence that these orders reflect real consumption rather than any precautionary buying? Then, we talked about, you said double ordering is something probably the suppliers look at. Just with all the component costs going up, any danger of any demand destruction? Just, if you can just help us with what you're embedding into your outlook and risk management for the year kind of. Thank you.

Yeah. There's a few questions in there. I'll probably let Phil jump in on a couple of those as well. I guess maybe just to answer your question, our approach for giving guidance hasn't really changed from past quarters. We're taking the roll-up from the teams and putting some intelligence on it. We feel good about the guidance we've provided, and we're shipping a lot more units. Again, the guidance doesn't assume any meaningful price aspects in that guide. There's some modest price increases, but it's rounding relative to the overall scheme. This is really units. By the way, increased ASP mix. We have higher ASP products that are going through our volumes as well, so that's part of the equation. Again, you mentioned it, backlog strong, book-to-bill is well above parity, and we're seeing volumes move.

I would say we are seeing more and more customers, especially large OEMs, trying to build up, let's say, safety stock, buffer stocks, things like that. I think in this environment, it's hard to get a hold of it. We'll use memory as an example. A lot of customers wish they had more. There's not more to be had. I don't think we feel that there's any excess builds or this is a lot of safety stock. We believe this is getting much closer to true consumption. I guess time will tell there, but there's nothing we see in our indicators that suggest significant buildup of customer inventories. With that being said, memory is causing some constraints in terms of getting everything you need to build.    

I think generally speaking, lead times are up and to the right, and inventory is being consumed as it comes in, and that's why we're turning things faster. Phil, any other commentary there?

Yeah. No, just on the long and short, no, we're not seeing demand disruption at this point. On the book-to-bill, yeah, the book-to-bill is positive as you caught in our script. The double booking question just comes up. I think Joe asked that as well. I'm not sure we got to that. Apologize. You're right, Ruplu. We kind of lean on the suppliers to try to track for the double bookings, right? We wouldn't see that. We look at the forecast management and inflated demand, which is part of your question. We try to, as we manage these MRPs coming in with either API, EDIs, what have you, we even try to put some analytics around it to say, "Hey, what's the reality of that? How real is that forecast?" We look for spikes.

If something all of a sudden spikes up, we go back and challenge the customer. Do they really need that additional product or not? The backlog is, we sanitize as best we possibly can, work with the suppliers as best we possibly can. The other thing we look at is rates. We're not seeing anything today, as we look at it, abnormal from a cancellation standpoint. We roll up, back to your point, we roll up the forecast from the field. As Ken points out, we have a lot of dialogues, as you can imagine, then we got analytics that says, "Okay, what's the analytics saying we're going to do?" It's lining up to what we guided.

Okay. Thanks for all the details. I appreciate it.

Our next question is from Melissa Fairbanks with Raymond James.

Hey, guys. Thanks very much. Congratulations on another exceptional quarter. It's pretty clear all of our models were completely wrong and not appreciating the growth rates. That's a good problem to have, I think.

Yeah, yeah. Phil, I know you have a pile of sheets with data in front of you, if you could just make that available to us, that would be great. I wanted to kind of dig in on the Farnell improvement. Obviously, we know that that's a highly cyclical business, at the same time, you have been making a lot of structural changes over there, congratulations to the team for succeeding there. Is there a way to quantify what sustainable margin profile is going to look like versus we've got structural improvement plus end market demand? Is there a way to kind of parse that out?  

Yeah. Don't know if I can get into the NATS detail on that, the answer is yes.

We know that the high service guys can get some non-traditional demand as we saw last cycle, come into their inventory and whatnot. Then, we do get some accelerated ASPs and margin as a company because of that for now, which has many benefits. What we are doing is we're breaking out anywhere we're having heavy ASP inflation with Farnell, with Rebeca and team, and say, "Okay, what's our performance without that?" We're actually building in the model, when there's a cycle adjustment, what is the margin model? What do we predict the margin model based on what we saw? We are modeling that. I don't have the exact numbers on that floor, but it's going to be much higher than what the cycle four was last time. That's how we're managing.

Don't have all the businesses, frankly, Farnell for sure, because they do get some accelerated growth here. We're proud of that, the team there as well as we are the rest of the team. That was a nice jump for us, for sure.

The other data point I'd give you, Melissa, would just be from a memory side, when we talk about that's mostly EC commentary.

Farnell is benefiting some from memory, but it's a much smaller percentage of their sales than what we see in the EC. I would still say, we're still probably earlier innings in terms of seeing some of that additional demand coming from shortages and things like that. I still think EC business is kind of fulfilling customers as they need it and pipelining and things like that. Farnell is probably seeing some benefit, but likely more as things get tight. 

Their diversification is interesting too, Melissa. We are investing quite a bit in onboard components, which by definition is semiconductors, IP&E. That helps their overall margin model as well. That tends to run a little bit higher than the test and measurement. Although that's great business for us, it's just the margin's a little bit lower in that space and higher on the board components. We're intentionally driving that mix.

Perfect. Appreciate all that detail. I was kind of curious if you can comment on what you're seeing. I know that you've seen some growth driven by transport, improved demand there. In automotive, we've heard from some of your suppliers recently, including one this morning, that was saying the automotive guys, the OEMs, are pressuring the tier 1s to finally start securing more inventory. I think that this is a little bit of a swing factor from, we saw this overcorrection back to just-in-time or extremely lean inventory levels after the supply chain crisis. Maybe now we're starting to realize, demand is still there and the supply is tight. I was wondering if you could comment on what you're seeing there.

Yeah. I know exactly what you're talking about. Of course, we talked about General Motors in the script and-

A nice win there. I looked at the transportation verticals across the world, we actually saw an increase in all regions in transportation. It's coming from a lower year-on-year compare. Even in Europe, we saw it up low double digit. Asia, roughly 15%-20%, here in the U.S., 25% year-on-year. There is a swing there. Part of that is just, there's also more products being designed in that are technology, semiconductor and passive. The content is going up, which we're benefiting from. I'm not aware of any intentional conversations with any of the transportation guys where they're just stockpiling inventory or anything along those lines. There have been a few customers that have had those conversations outside the automotive, but if they're happy, I'm not directly involved in those dialogues. Well, I can't comment on that.

I would just say, Melissa, from our supply chain solutions business perspective, though, we're having lots of conversations in the transportation space about how we can help keep supply chains going. Again, we're not privy to Tier 1 versus the automakers, but clearly, there was some bad outcomes last time around when things got short in the transportation space, definitely, they're not looking to have that happen again. I think Phil's comment was, "We don't want a $2 part holding up a $100,000 vehicle.

Yeah. Our suppliers are going to watch that, too, right? They don't want to overship either into that and cause another issue like we saw last cycle. 

Yeah, I think bad outcomes is an understatement.

Yeah. Right. A couple of the suppliers that have announced this week talk more about the mass market.

Yeah. Okay, great. Thanks very much, guys. Appreciate all the color.

Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. I would like to hand the floor back over to Phil Gallagher for any closing remarks.

Okay, thank you. I want to thank everybody for attending today's earnings call. I look forward to speaking to you again at our first quarter fiscal year 2027 earnings report in November. Okay. Have a good rest of the summer. Thank you.

This concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you again for your participation.

Avnet (AVT) Q4 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Company Participants