With a combined revenue of $21 trillion and $2.1 trillion in profits, the 2026 Fortune 500 is the definitive list of America's largest companies.

Fortune 500

Almost $20 trillion in revenue—and a record-breaking $1.87 trillion in profits. Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive list of the biggest companies in America.

F500 2025-Autoliv

<p>Swedish American manufacturer Autoliv is the largest supplier to the automotive industry of passive safety systems, which protect occupants when a crash has already occurred. According to its own estimates, its seat belts and airbags helps prevent 600,000 injuries and save 37,000 lives a year. In 2017, the company decided to break itself in half and float its new entity Veoneer onto the stock exchange via a spinoff. As a result, Autoliv is no longer in the business of providing active safety systems, which use electronics to mitigate or prevent accidents before they occur.</p>

Industries included in the sector are autos and auto parts manufacturers.

Fortune Sector Leaders: Motor Vehicles and Parts

The Fortune 500, in its 70th year in 2024, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

The Fortune 500, in its 69th year in 2023, ranks the biggest U.S. companies by revenue.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 68th running of the list.

This year’s Fortune 500 marks the 67th running of the list.

F500-2021-392-Autoliv

As one of the largest automotive safety suppliers in the world, the Swedish-American company sells items such as seatbelts and airbags to every major car manufacturer in the world.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 66th running of the list.

F500-2020-369-AutoLiv

Autoliv develops, manufactures and markets protective systems, such as airbags, seatbelts, and steering wheels, for major automotive manufacturers worldwide. It also makes mobility safety solutions, such as pedestrian protection, connected safety services and safety solutions for riders of powered two- wheelers.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 65th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 64th running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 63rd running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 62nd running of the list.

This year's Fortune 500 marks the 61st running of the list. Wal-Mart claims the top spot again. See who made the list.

Wal-Mart stayed on top as its sales crept closer to half-a-trillion dollars. Apple moved into the top five. And UnitedHealth Group continued its steady climb. 

Key Financials (last Fiscal Year)

Revenues ($M)

Profits ($M)

Assets ($M)

Total Stockholder Equity ($M)

Profit Ratios

Profit as % of Revenues

Profits as % of Assets

Profits as % of Stockholder Equity

Earnings Per Share (last Fiscal Year)

Earnings Per Share ($)

EPS % Change (from prior fiscal year)

EPS % Change (5 year annual rate)

EPS % Change (10 year annual rate)

Total Return

Total Return to Investors (last year)

Total Return to Investors (5 year, annualized)

Total Return to Investors (10 year, annualized)

Swedish American manufacturer Autoliv is the largest supplier to the automotive industry of passive safety systems, which protect occupants when a crash has already occurred. According to its own estimates, its seat belts and airbags helps prevent 600,000 injuries and save 37,000 lives a year. In 2017, the company decided to break itself in half and float its new entity Veoneer onto the stock exchange via a spinoff. As a result, Autoliv is no longer in the business of providing active safety systems, which use electronics to mitigate or prevent accidents before they occur.

Q2 2026

Q1 2026

Q4 2025

Q3 2025

Q2 2025

Q1 2025

Q4 2024

Autoliv (ALV): Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings

legacy

Autoliv

autoliv

Good day, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Autoliv second quarter 2026 financial results conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question and answer session. To ask a question during the session, you will need to press star one one on your telephone. You will hear an automated message advising your hand is raised. To withdraw your question, please press star one and one again. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Anders Trapp. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Sandra. Welcome, everyone, to our second quarter 2026 earnings call. On this call, we have our President and Chief Executive Officer, Mikael Bratt, our Chief Financial Officer, Monika Grama, and me, Anders Trapp, VP, Investor Relations. During today's earnings call, we will highlight several key areas, including our strong performance despite the challenging market environment. We will provide an update on our structural cost reduction initiative in EMEA, an update on the latest market development and our full year guidance and the potential impact of ongoing geopolitical challenges. Following the presentation, we will be available to answer your questions. As usual, the slides are available on autoliv.com. Turning to the next slide. We have the Safe Harbor statement, which is an integrated part of this presentation and includes the Q&A that follows. During the presentation, we will reference non-GAAP measures.

The reconciliations of historical GAAP to non-GAAP measures are disclosed in our quarterly earnings release available on autoliv.com and in the 10-Q that will be filed with the SEC, and also at the end of this presentation. Lastly, I should mention that this call is intended to conclude at 3:00 P.M. Central European Time, please follow a limit of two questions per person. I now hand it over to our CEO, Mikael Bratt.

Thank you, Anders. Looking on the next slide. We delivered a record second quarter, both for sales and adjusted operating income, underscoring the resilience of our company and the strength of our market position. Supported by strong customer partnerships and a relentless focus on continuous improvement, we have built a solid momentum for the rest of the year. During the quarter, we also navigated geopolitical developments effectively, mitigating the impact of tariffs, supply chain disruptions, and raw material cost volatility. As you might have seen in the report and will hear from us during this call, we have several positive and negative one-time items in the quarter. This includes a supplier settlement reversion from Q3 2025, an IEEPA refund, government income in India, an impairment charge related to restructuring activities in Turkey, and a reversed expected credit loss reserve.

Combined, these items have virtually no impact on the adjusted operating margin and only a slight negative impact on the top line. Our positive sales momentum in Asia continued during the quarter. In China, we once again outperformed light vehicle production, driven by strong growth with Chinese OEMs, where our sales outperformed by more than 40 percentage points. In India, we grew sales by 36% organically, reflecting mainly the trend of increased safety content in vehicles in India. Adjusted operating income and margin improved despite raw material headwinds, particularly higher helium prices. The strong performance was primarily driven by higher sales and well-executed activities to improve efficiency and costs. I am pleased that our cash flow improved in line with our expectations, resulting in record operating cash flow for the second quarter and supporting our ambitious shareholder return strategy.

Despite repurchasing over 1.6 million shares for $200 million and paying a dividend of $64 million, our leverage ratio improved to 1.2x. During the quarter, we announced additional structural cost initiatives, which we will elaborate on in the next slide. Based on what we know today, we reiterate our full year 2026 guidance of flat organic sales with continued significant outperformance of light vehicle production in both China and India. We continue to expect an adjusted operating margin of around 10.5%-11%. This is based on the assumption that global light vehicle production will decline by around 2.5%, and that the gross headwind from raw materials is around $110 million.

I'm also proud that we signed strategic cooperation agreements with leading Chinese vehicle manufacturers, Great Wall Motor and XPENG. These agreements mark important milestones in our strategy to expand with leading Chinese vehicle manufacturers and further demonstrate the competitiveness of our safety solutions. They strengthen our position as a trusted safety partner and creates a strong platform for sustainable long-term growth, both in China and globally, as they expand their footprint. Looking now on our continued cost reduction activities on the next slide. To strengthen our competitiveness and support our financial targets, we are continuing our global structural cost reduction initiatives. As a part of this effort, we have decided to gradually discontinue our manufacturing operations in Turkey, which today produce steering wheels, airbags, and seat belts.

Production will be transferred to our existing facilities across EMEA region, allowing us to optimize our manufacturing footprint while maintaining our ability to serve customers efficiently. This decision is expected to affect approximately 2,200 employees. The transition will take place over the coming years, with the complete closure anticipated during the first half of 2028. From a financial perspective, we expect total restructuring charges of approximately $142 million, of which $90 million was recognized in the second quarter of 2026. Cash out is expected to be approximately $129 million, with a limited impact on our 2026 cash flow. Importantly, this initiative is expected to generate annually pre-tax saving of approximately $40 million, with benefits beginning to materialize in 2027 and reaching the full run rate in 2028. Overall, this action is an important step in improving our cost competitiveness and is supporting us in achieving our financial targets.

Looking now on the next slide. Second quarter sales increased by approximately 3% year-over-year, driven by outperformance relative to light vehicle production, along with favorable currency effects, partly offset by lower tariff-related compensations. The adjusted operating income from Q2 increased by 7% to $217 million. The adjusted operating margin was 9.6%, 30 basis points higher. Operating cash flow was a strong $434 million, an increase of $157 million. Looking on to the next slide. We continue to deliver broad-based improvements. Our positive direct labor productivity trend continues. This is supported by the implementation of our strategic initiatives, including automation and digitalization. Gross profit increased by $8 million, while the gross margin decreased by 30 basis points, mainly due to the reversal of a supplier settlement.

The decline in gross margin from 18.5% to 18.2%, driven by a supplier compensation reversion and asset impairment related to the Turkey restructuring, which combined reduces gross margin by almost 80 basis points. RD&E net increased year-over-year, primarily on negative currency translation effects, higher personnel costs, and lower engineering income due to timing of specific customer development projects. SG&A decreased by $7 million, mainly due to reverse estimate of credit loss reserves, partly offset by negative FX translation effects. In relation to sales, SG&A improved by 40 basis points to 4.9%. Looking now on the market development in the second quarter on the next slide. According to S&P Global's July data, global light vehicle production declined by 0.3% in the second quarter, approximately 160 basis points better than expected in April.

Stronger than expected performance in North and South America, Europe, India, and South Korea helped offset softer production levels in China. The global regional LVP mix was approximately 60 basis points unfavorable in the quarter, primarily driven by stronger light vehicle production in lower content markets relative to other markets. During the quarter, volatility improved year-over-year, but declined slightly sequentially, driven by weaker development in China. We will talk about the market development more in detail later in the presentation. Looking now on our sales growth in more detail on the next slide. Our consolidated quarterly net sales exceeded $2.8 billion for the second time in our history. This was approximately $90 million higher than in the prior year, primarily driven by positive currency translation effect of $62 million.

This benefit was partly offset by approximately $5 million of lower tariff-related compensations, mainly due to an IEEPA-related refund of $9.6 million during the quarter. Excluding currencies, our organic sales grew $27 million or by 1%, including negative tariff cost compensation. Based on the latest light vehicle production data from S&P Global, we outperformed the market by over one percentage point globally. Our outperformance was significant in Asia. In Asia, excluding China, we outperformed the market by six percentage points, driven by continued strong sales growth in India, where we outperformed by around 20 percentage points. Japan and South Korea also contributed to the outperformance. In China, we delivered outperformance of more than seven percentage points, supported by strong sales growth with Chinese OEMs, whose production grew over 40 percentage points faster than light vehicle production.

As a result, the Chinese OEMs accounted for 55% of our sales in China in the quarter, compared to 40% last year. The negative performance in the Americas can partly be attributed to lower tariff compensation following the IEEPA refund, as well as an unfavorable mix driven by strong light vehicle production growth in lower-content South American markets. Globally, Chery, Suzuki, NIO were the largest drivers of sales growth during the quarter. Despite the light vehicle production decline in China accounted for 90% of sales. Asia, excluding China, also accounted for 90%. Americas for 32% and EMEA for 30%. Looking now on the next slide. The second quarter of 2026 saw a high number of new launches, primarily in China, with both Chinese and other OEMs. These new China launches reflect strong momentum for Autoliv in this important market.

Higher CPV is driven by front center airbags on many of these new vehicles. In terms of Autoliv's sales potential, the NIO ES9 is the most significant in the quarter. For rest of 2026, we expect a high number of new product launches, mainly driven by Chinese OEMs, offsetting fewer launches in Americas and Europe. Let's continue with the next slide. I will now hand over to Monika.

Thank you, Mikael. I will talk about the financials more in details on the next few slides. Turning to the next slide. This slide highlights our key figures for the second quarter of 2026 compared to the same quarter of 2025. Our net sales were $2.8 billion, representing a 3% increase. Gross profit increased by $8 million and gross margin decreased by 30 basis points. The drivers behind the gross profit improvement were mainly positive FX effects and lower costs for materials. This was partly offset by $13 million in costs for a supplier compensation reversal and $9 million in asset impairments related to the restructuring activity. The adjusted operating income increased from $251 million to $270 million, and the adjusted operating margin increased from 9.3% to 9.6%.

The reported operating income of $192 million was $78 million lower than the adjusted operating income, mainly due to higher capacity alignment activities. The adjusted earnings per share diluted increased by $0.23 to $2.43. The main drivers were $0.18 from higher operating income, $0.10 from lower number of outstanding shares diluted, partly offset by $0.07 from higher taxes. Our adjusted return on capital employed and adjusted return on equity were solid, 25% and 28%, respectively. We repurchased shares of $200 million and paid a dividend of $0.87 per share. Looking now on the adjusted operating income bridge on the next slide. In the second quarter of 2026, our adjusted operating income increased by $18 million. Operations contributed $61 million, primarily driven by higher organic sales and cost reductions supported by better call-off stability.

This was partly offset by $15 million in costs for a supplier compensation reversal. Excluding $6 million of FX translation effects and the supplier compensation reversal, RD&E net and SG&A increased by $6 million, partly driven by $5 million lower RD&E reimbursement. During the quarter, we recovered approximately 83% of our U.S. tariff costs, excluding IEEPA related recoveries, bringing our year-to-date recovery rate to 78%. The combination of unrecovered tariffs and the dilutive effect of the recovered portion was around 20 basis points negative. However, compared to last year, it was a positive impact of around 15 basis points, as the negative effect of last year was around 35 basis points. Looking now at cash flow on the next slide. Operating cash flow for the second quarter was $434 million, an increase of $157 million. This change was primarily driven by a positive working capital impact of $240 million.

The working capital contribution reflects a normalization following the first quarter increase, which was largely driven by the high sales level in March 2026 and several adverse one-time impacts. The improvement was primarily attributable to changes in accounts payable of $120 million, net receivables of $35 million, and accrued severance and restructuring costs of $48 million. Free operating cash flow improved by $177 million to $340 million. Year-to-date operating cash flow increased by $4 million to $359 million, and free operating cash flow improved by $31 million to $170 million compared to the prior year. Capital expenditures net for the quarter decreased by $19 million. Capital expenditures net in relation to sales was 3.4% versus 4.2% year-over-year. The lower level of capital expenditures net is mainly related to lower footprint optimization and less capacity expansion.

The cash conversion for the last 12 months was 119%, exceeding our target of at least 80%. Now, looking on our debt leverage on the next slide. Autoliv's balanced leverage strategy reflects our prudent financial management, enabling resilience, innovation, and sustained stakeholder value over time. Our leverage ratio improved from 1.3x to 1.2x during the quarter, despite shareholder returns totaling $264 million. Our net debt decreased by around $75 million in the quarter, while the 12-month trailing adjusted EBITDA increased by $33 million. On to the next slide. I will now hand it back to Mikael.

Thank you, Monika. I will talk about the outlook for 2026 more in detail on the next few slides. Turning to the next slide. Overall, S&P Global expects global light vehicle production to decline by 2.3% in 2026, representing an almost two percentage point downward revision from its January forecast. The downgrade is primarily driven by lower production expectations in China and the Middle East, while many other markets continue to demonstrate notable demand resilience. In Europe, light vehicle production is expected to decline by nearly 1%, reflecting ongoing affordability challenges and increasing competition from Chinese imports. For North America, S&P Global has revised its outlook upward and now expects production to decline by only 1% in 2026. The market continues to display resilience despite uncertainty related to the conflict in the Middle East and the higher fuel prices.

S&P Global has lowered its outlook for China light vehicle production by four percentage points since January and now expects a 5% decline in 2026. The weaker outlook reflects a challenging demand environment driven by reduced government incentives, ongoing macroeconomic headwinds, and increasingly cautious consumer sentiment, despite continued strength in the vehicle exports. S&P Global revised its light vehicle production outlook upward for both Japan and South Korea, and now expects production to decline by only 1% and 2%, respectively. The improved outlook reflects strengthening exports to the U.S. and Europe, supported by robust demand for fuel-efficient hybrid electric vehicles. India's light vehicle production is expected to increase by 9%, driven by a reduction in purchase taxes on new vehicles, which benefits smaller and lower-priced models.

Escalating geopolitical tension in the Persian Gulf continues to increase risks across the automotive value chain, with potential implications for energy prices, consumer sentiment, supply chain stability, raw material availability, and overall industry volumes. Looking on the second half year development on the next slide. As we look ahead to the second half of the year, we remain focused on managing a dynamic external environment. We are closely monitoring the potential impact of geopolitical developments in and around the Persian Gulf, which could affect supply chains, raw material costs, and overall vehicle demand. Our 2026 guidance currently assumes a gross raw material headwind of approximately $110 million. We continue to evaluate multiple scenarios as the situation evolves. Despite these challenges, we expect margin expansions to be supported by FX, engineering income, and customer compensations.

For the third quarter, we expect the adjusted operating margin to be similar to the first half year level. Importantly, customer compensation, engineering income, and other litigation initiatives are expected to be weighted toward the fourth quarter, resulting in a significant step-up in profitability in the fourth quarter. Therefore, the earnings trajectory in 2026 is expected to be similar to that of 2023 and 2024, reflecting both the timing of anticipated compensations and the typical seasonal ramp-up in profitability and operating leverage. Looking on the updated full-year guidance on the next slide. This slide shows our full-year guidance, which excludes effects from capacity alignment and antitrust-related matters.

It is based on no material changes to tariffs or trade restrictions that are in effect as of July 9th, 2026, as well as no significant changes in the macroeconomic environment or changes in customer call-off stability or significant supply chain disruptions. We expect to outperform light vehicle production by around 2.5 percentage points as our organic sales is expected to be flat, while global light vehicle production is expected to decline by 2.5%. The net currency translation effect on sales is expected to be around 2.5% positive. The guidance for adjusted operating margin is around 10.5%-11%. Operating cash flow is expected to be around $1.2 billion. We expect CapEx to be below 5% of sales. Our positive cash flow and strong balance sheet supports our continued commitment to a high level of shareholder returns. We expect a tax rate of around 30%.

Looking on to the next slide. This concludes our forum and comments for today's earnings call, and we would like to open the line for questions from analysts and investors. I now hand it back to our operator, Sandra.

Thank you. As a reminder, to ask a question, please press star one one on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press star one and one again. We will now take the first question from the line of Colin Langan from Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.

Great. Thanks for taking my questions. If I look at your comments about the cadence of margins, I think you had previously said it'd be more linear. Now it sounds, I think the math is something like you need a 15% margin in Q4 to get to the midpoint of your full-year guidance. What changed and how maybe we should think about raw material costs? I think year to date you had $26 million. Is that a similar number in Q3 and is all of that recovered in Q4 and is that a big driver of the Q4 spike, is the recovery of all that raw material in Q4?

Thank you. Good question there. As we said, when we started this year, our expectation was that we could see more of a, let's say, normal, traditional sequence of how the quarter played out in the year. Now we're talking about the more back-end loaded. Why it's more back-end loaded is because we see the inflationary pressure here in the value chain as a result of the Persian Gulf. I think What have changed is really that upward pressure on the cost side. For us, as you know, we don't buy raw materials directly, so it's through our supply chain, and we have a timeline there, but we also have, I should say, a diluting effect of the height of it as well. We need to get that through and then enter into the negotiations with our customers here on the price adjustments.

The way of working is very similar to what we saw, if you call it, during the inflationary years, then 2023, 2024, as we refer to here. That is really the change compared to when we talked about Q4. Let me just say that also that I feel very comfortable in how this trajectory look like, because first of all, we have done it before. Secondly, we are very focused around the different activities to secure the outcome here, meaning that it's a combination, of course, of our internal work here to drive efficiency and cost improvement in general. Here we also, as we state in the report, we have a good momentum in what we do there, and that's why we feel comfortable here to retain and maintain the full year guidance.

Then in combination then with price discussions where you have the lead time with our customers. Also here, I would say we have well-established routines also to manage that. Yeah, we have clear activities here to do and have confidence in our ability to work on that.

We should expect almost 100% of the raw materials recovered, just to clarify, or is there still some exposure not for the year because of timing?

No, it's a combination of, let's call it self-help then, meaning that we need, of course, to do our bit here with making sure that we don't let through everything in from our suppliers here. We're working with our suppliers to make sure that we are as efficient as possible in this environment there. Then we have also cost-out activities internally in the company. Then the third leg is then the price adjustments with our customers here. As you know, the price negotiations with the customers is also very detailed. It's not the general percentage adjustment. It is really down to the component level here to see how the different components have been impacted by customers, so hence the lead time also. There are several levers to work with how to offset the inflation.

Got it. Just last question. You lowered production from one to down two and a half. What is the offset? Is that better growth over market? Where are you seeing that sort of better than expected growth that's offsetting the production weakness? Is that maybe a geographic mix help or?

I think what we see is, of course, is that we have a positive mix with how the market is developing, and we also have good growth with our Chinese customers here, and India is also contributing here. I think we are in the right places here to capture the growth that actually is out there.

Got it. All right. Thanks for taking my questions.

Thank you. We will now take the next question from the line of Emmanuel Rosner from Wolfe. Please go ahead.

Great. Thank you so much. One follow-up on the cadence, please. Just to be clear, are you expecting most of the mitigating impact from the recoveries and from your own self-help to happen in the fourth quarter? I am just trying to understand the delta between what you are saying for Q3 margins and then what maybe consensus expectations were. That is probably like $35 million delta. Just curious if are these unmitigated headwinds in Q3 and then you get it all back in Q4?

No, the majority is in Q4. I think that is how you should read it. Of course, we are managing part of it in the third quarter, as a natural progression also, if you look at the engineering income, it is mainly in the fourth quarter rather than in the third quarter. I think that is quite natural. It is really engineering income. It is also the higher customer compensation that we talked about here for the inflation. I think also if you look at the sales progression, it is also for the remainder of the year, also geared towards the fourth quarter. That is really the reason for that.

Understood. Then can you give us a little bit more color around the IEEPA refunds dynamics? I was not able to follow exactly to what extent it helped your EBIT in the quarter and what you expect on a full year basis.

Right now in the quarter, we got back around $12 million from the government, which we largely passed on to our customers, around $9 million. We retain a positive impact of $3 million in the net results. As mentioned previously, our aim is to recover the tariff or the net impact of the tariff on year to date to a large extent on year to go and to reach a similar recovery rate that we had in the prior year, which was around 5%.

Thank you. We will now take the next question from the line of Tom Narayan from RBC. Please go ahead.

Yeah. Hi, thanks for taking the question. I have a follow-up to Colin's question on the growth of our market. I remember at the Investor Day in Sweden, we heard a story about how we're going to see good growth of our market coming from increasing content per vehicle, especially from emerging markets. You are calling for 2.5% growth of our market this year. I know there's some offsets, notably Americas in this past quarter was down 5%. I just wanted to understand that a little bit more. I know in the report there was a call-out of South America, which had, I guess, lower content per vehicle, and then on replacement vehicles. Does this mean that the growth in South America were happening in vehicles with no safety content? I just want to understand why it would be down 5%.

I know that's versus a very strong market level in South America, if you have any safety content, I would think it would be up. I just want to understand that better, I will follow up.

Yeah, let me start to recap here, because when we talk about the growth and the Capital Markets Day you mentioned here, it was really three significant buckets we talked about here. One was LVP, 1%-2%. It was then the content that's 1%-2%. If you imagine a flat LVP, you had a content growth there of 1%-2% on top of that. What we talk about now here is really that we see a market that is down with 2.5% LVP portion of it. Then, of course, we have a mix effect here connected, of course, to the content very much. What we talk about here is when South America is growing and U.S., if we stay in America, so to speak, just to simplify a little bit, which is a high content is flat or even will go down.

Even if you have growth in South America content, it's not enough to offset what's going down in the high content markets. There, of course, you'll get a negative mix effect on the content side. Long story short, we definitely see that the content growth is there, and we see also how both the, let's call it, the low content markets are growing in the content as well as the high content over time here. When we talk about India specifically, it's very much so that it's a content driven growth that we see. The last two years, the content have grown sequentially with 20% two years in a row. A strong growth there. What we try to convey there at Capital Markets Day definitely still holds here.

Unfortunately, you have a mix effect here that is not giving you the full potential here.

Okay, understood. Then my follow-up, I guess, what was the rationale to move production from Turkey to EMEA? Was it cost saves coming from a plant maybe that wasn't as automated? Was it labor? I guess, what was driving that decision? Thanks.

No, I think we constantly review our global footprints, and here we talk about EMEA, where we have over the last couple of years taken significant steps to consolidate our activities and optimize them as we move forward. That's something we have done and we continue to do moving forward also to make sure that we have the most competitive setup. We saw here now that with the opportunity to continue to consolidate capacity into other sites in Europe, we have a strong business case to do so, and you have seen the numbers, and you have the numbers here. That's of course a tough decision to take and painful for our colleagues in Turkey that have done a great job over the years. We need, of course, to make sure that we maintain our competitiveness.

We're moving some to our Tunisian operations that have been a growing plant over the last couple of years here, and we're also moving into other sites in Europe, Romania, for example. It's to continue to sharpen our position here.

Thank you. We will now take the next question from the line of Winnie Dong from Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.

Hi, thanks so much for taking my question. I just wanted to follow up on your production assumption for the full year a little bit more. Now you're assuming 2.5% decline. Previously, you were at 1%. I think lately IHS actually improved our outlook a little bit. I just wanted to understand if there's a mixed situation that's going on, and if you can help us triangulate what you're seeing, and if you're just truing up to what the market is trending towards. Thank you.

Yeah. Thank you for your question there. I think S&P now is at -2.3%. We are at 2.5%. I would say that's about the same level. It's more a little difference here. The big move you could say here is that we have seen a deeper weakening in China than expected here. To some extent, also the Middle East, but Middle East is still a very small part of the total picture here. I think it's less than 2% when you talk about Middle East, Africa here. It's really about the weakening in China, domestic sales there and domestic operations. At least the change-

Okay. Got you. Thanks. That's helpful. You do have very good momentum happening in China. I know it's difficult to delineate the strength between domestic, which is seeing a lot of weakness right now, but export is actually very strong. Is there a general framework on how we can think about how much the export is actually contributing to your outlook in China?

For us, it's all domestic, you could say, that we're delivering in there because we don't have separate value chains or separate setups if it's an export vehicle or it's a domestic. We don't really see that split from our perspective. For us, it's all domestic sales to domestic plants. You're absolutely correct here that the production level is holding up better than what the domestic sales to the end consumer would indicate. Our China operation is definitely supported by the exports here. Yeah, I think we will see going forward here, but when we talk about the adjustments we just mentioned here to the -2.5%, it's the net effect of that, of course.

Thank you. We will now take the next question from the line of Hampus Engellau from Handelsbanken. Please go ahead.

Thank you very much. One question from me, it is relating to the Turkey production closure, but also going back to your capacity line and programs in Europe. I am not exactly updated, but that initially was about 8,000 people, and this is additional 2,200 people. I am just trying to understand where you are now in terms of headcount and where you see demand trending. Is this a part of the optimization program that you have been running since 2019, or is it also that you need less capacity or have had too much capacity? It would be interesting to hear your thoughts on these different parameters. Thank you.

Thank you, Hampus. I think as I alluded to before, it's a constant review of how to optimize your production facilities. It's not that we had an overcapacity necessarily in Turkey, but we had an overcapacity in the whole system here, where we saw opportunities to consolidate even further. You're correct in the way to say that the optimization definitely contributes to our opportunity to put more into the existing plants somewhere else. When you drive the optimization, you can also create the flexibility we have talked about before. We can also see that with an efficient, optimized, and flexible setup, you need less square meter to produce the same amount. When you harvest that, so to speak, you come to these kinds of decisions every now and then, where you're actually looking at the complete site, and by then consolidating it in.

It's a way of harvesting the continuous improvement or also the step changes that we've seen as a result of new technologies.

Thank you. We will now take the next question from the line of Itay Michaeli from TD Cowen. Please go ahead.

Great. Thank you, everybody. Just two follow-ups for me. Just first back to the margin guidance, just given the updated cadence for the year, is there any bias at this point towards the lower half or upper half of your full year margin range?

No, as you see here, we haven't expressed an upper or lower end or more precision than what we have here, which is within the range of around 10.5%-11%. If you ask me, which I think you do, why we are not more precise here, it is really that we see with everything going on here that there is difficult to be more precise than what we are with the interval here. I think the interval here reflects the volatility in the market, so to say, and uncertainty when it comes to the market in whole and also this inflation pressure here, if it's a long-term thing or if it's more of a short-term thing. With what we see right now, this is the best judgment we can do now that we should be within that range.

That's helpful. Thank you. As a quick follow-up, can you maybe comment on order intake trends in the quarter, if you've seen any improvement there? Maybe how just order intake the last couple of years just maybe impacts how we should think about your growth over market in Americas and Europe, say over the next 12-24 months.

We don't disclose any details around the current order intake. More than I can say that I feel comfortable that we have activities in that area that support depending our market share here, which is around 45%, as we have mentioned before. I would say, as always, you start out the year where you have a lot of indications that it will be at a certain level, and then as the year plays out, some things are then being pushed out to the next year, meaning that the OEMs decide to delay the decisions and so on. In this circumstances that we have right now with a lot of questions around the sentiment in the market, the driveline issues and so on that we saw taking place maybe a year and a half ago, and some reshuffling in the model programs took place.

I would say to some extent that it's partly still going on, but it is a reasonable activity level here when it comes to tenders that are out there. All in all, I think we are in a good shape here to defend our market share, and I would say also activity level-wise, it's a decent year from an OEM perspective in terms of activities.

Thank you. We will now take the next question from the line of Agnieszka Vilela from Nordea. Please go ahead.

Thank you, and hi Mikael, Monika, and Anders.

I have two questions. Starting with your growth with the Chinese OEMs, you have been very successful by increasing your sales towards them, and you announced also the new cooperation with XPENG and Great Wall. Overall, do you expect that the growing China mix in your sales will have mutual, positive or negative impact on your group content per vehicle and on your profitability?

As you know, the profitability part, I can't go into any details here. As I normally say, it's more a platform program by a platform program than anything else. In terms of our growth opportunities here, I definitely see this as a very important and great opportunity to secure our future growth here. As you've seen here, we have grown from 22% of our China sales in 2022 to 55% of our China sales now in Q2. At the same time as the China OEMs have taken their share of the light vehicle production from roughly 43% in 2022 to 72% now in the second quarter of this year.

The combination here of us increasing with them as well as they increasing their share of light vehicle production contributes very positively, of course, to the growth, but also to securing our position in China here as the market leader and also with the opportunities that may be in the future here also when the Chinese OEMs also moving out their footprint to support more locally integrated in the different regions. Right now, you could say it's mainly an export-driven activity here, which also support us, of course, here in this. In the quarter year, four out of the eight fastest growing customers are Chinese OEMs. It's very helpful, absolutely, and important. I think also-

Just coming back to the agreements you referred to here, it's of course also very interesting opportunities for us also when it comes to driving innovation here, because many of these customers are very innovative in terms of their expectations on the future interiors and I would say more advanced products to solve more challenging seating positions, et cetera. Very interesting from a innovation point of view as well.

Perfect. Thank you for the color. The second question, coming back to growth, looking at your performance in H1, you outperformed the market by two percentage point, just looking at what you guide for For the full year, it looks like this outperformance needs to accelerate to three percentage point. Can you just give us any kind of reasons why and drivers behind this acceleration in outperformance and growth?

Yeah, I think FX is one part of it as well. I think we have also talked here about before a slightly positive effect coming from the mix here. Because before we talked about more of a flat or a neutral regional mix for 2026, now we're looking at, let's say 40 basis points contribution coming from that as well. Then, of course, also you have some compensation activities here with our customers contributing slightly as well.

Thank you. We will now take our final question from the line of Dan Levy from Barclays. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good afternoon to you. Thank you for taking the questions. I wanted to go back to the question or the point of recovery payment. Can you maybe just put this in context of how the recovery payments that you're getting or that you're planning to get on raw materials, how that's at all related to the other recovery payments you'd have on other inflationary measures, whether the two are linked? With automakers, you've had a very good track record in the past of getting recoveries, but with automakers, especially in North America, tighter on pricing, is that at all playing any role in the types of conversations you have on the magnitude of recoveries?

Yeah, I wouldn't say that there is any difference in the dialogues today compared to what it was in 2025, 2024, 2023 here. It's never easy, and it has never been. Once again, I think here when it comes to the different buckets you're referring to here, tariffs is fairly straightforward, I would say, because that's something you have to pay when you cross the border, and it's very easily connected to the value flows you have towards the customer. Now with the 232, because we are mainly talking about the tariffs between Mexico and the U.S. here. With the 232, it will be almost automatized to a large extent when that is fully in effect. Engineering income is also something we talk about here as a part of the second half. That's also something that is part of ordinary course of business that we have been for years.

There's nothing strange there. When it comes to the inflation compensation here, we see then the combination here of costs. We need to do our part here together with our suppliers and our internal efficiency then come to the customer. It's a mix of the three here. Once again, it's a very detailed description down to the component level. Also here we are all hands on deck and established routines there. I would almost call it business as usual, maybe that's described a little bit too simple. We have a good way to deal with that part as well, and we are progressing as we speak here. No change either improved or deteriorated in terms of ability to do it.

Thank you. As a follow-up, I wanted to ask about the strategic cooperation frameworks you signed with Great Wall and XPENG. Could you just help us understand if you're aiming to set up additional agreements with other automakers, and to what extent does this position you well as you start to look at potential sourcing opportunities for these automakers in Europe? Does it position you to the front as they start to give out awards?

No. Of course, it's something that we constantly work with together with our customers, we have had these type of agreements in the past also with others, which we also have, I think, communicated not that long ago. They are important. I would say connected very much also to, first of all, the innovation opportunities here, because it really means that we get very close to our customers here by working well in advance with new joint challenges here. As I said before here, this different seating positions that is not traditional but may come when you see autonomous vehicle increase eventually over time. Already today, comfort is a key factor for many OEMs, meaning that you should be able to sit more relaxed, lean back more than what the current setups allow you to do. We call it the zero-gravity seat.

We have spoken about that here also in due time. It's an opportunity there. The further out you go, you could say with ambitions that some of the OEMs have here in terms of creating new interesting vehicles here, you have to have more challenging solutions at the end of the day, which drives also content, I would say. It puts us up to be in the forefront of developing these new type of technologies that is needed in the future. Very interesting and great opportunity to support our customers in a good way.

All the time we have for questions today. I would now like to turn the conference back to Mikael Bratt for closing remarks.

Autoliv (ALV) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Company Participants