• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
CommentaryPolitics

Kamala Harris’s endorsements show Republicans may be paying the price for their newfound anti-business rhetoric

By
Tevi Troy
Tevi Troy
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Tevi Troy
Tevi Troy
Down Arrow Button Icon
September 12, 2024, 6:46 AM ET

Tevi Troy is a senior fellow at the Bipartisan Policy Center and a former senior White House aide. He is the author of The Power and the Money: The Epic Clashes Between Commanders in Chief and Titans of Industry.

A screen displays an image of U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris at a Wall Street subway station near the New York Stock Exchange on Aug. 23.
A screen displays an image of U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris at a Wall Street subway station near the New York Stock Exchange on Aug. 23.Michael Nagle - Bloomberg - Getty Images

Eighty-eight American business leaders have written a letter endorsing Kamala Harris for president. This development may surprise those who assume that corporate business leaders lean Republican. But a close look at the signers, as well as the history of the relationship between business and government, reveals that while this is not some kind of watershed moment in terms of big business’ relationship with political leaders, it does signal that Republicans have some work to do in terms of their relationship with business.

The list of signers is far from a listing of 88 current Fortune 500 CEOs. Some 40 are “formers,” reflecting the fact that sitting business leaders need to be careful in being too explicitly on one side or the other of America’s deepening political divide. Others, like former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, are from academia more than from the business world. While the letter reveals that many business leaders are supportive of Harris, it does not suggest that the whole business world is on her side. Donald Trump has his own coterie of business leaders on his side, including Elon Musk, Steve Schwarzman, Bill Ackman, and Marc Andreessen.

Traditional affinities

There has long been political diversity among business leaders. Financier JP Morgan generally—and generously—backed Republicans throughout his career. Yet in 1884, he backed the conservative Democrat Grover Cleveland for president. Standard Oil’s John D. Rockefeller habitually gave money to Republicans but still clashed with trust-busting Republican Teddy Roosevelt, who criticized Rockefeller’s monopoly and initiated policies that led to the breakup of his company.

Many of the Harris endorsement letter signers are from the worlds of technology and entertainment. Connections between Democrats and Hollywood executives go back a long time. Harry and Jack Warner of the Warner Brothers studio strongly backed Franklin Roosevelt for president in 1932. The brothers attended his 1933 inauguration and regularly made films that advanced Roosevelt and his causes. In later years, agent and then studio head Lew Wasserman befriended Democratic president Lyndon Johnson and practically created the pipeline of Hollywood cash going to Democratic politicians.

The close links with Hollywood and Democrats of course continue today as well. When Hollywood executive—and Harris letter signer—Jeffrey Katzenberg made it known that the money was drying up for Joe Biden‘s faltering presidential campaign, it was like a stake through the heart of the Biden candidacy. Silicon Valley, another source for many of the letter’s signers, is a newer industry, but it has also long been a Democratic stronghold.

A shifting landscape

The letter’s signatories are also indicative of the evolution of our economy away from manufacturing and industrial companies that have tended to favor Republican policies on regulation. White-collar industries like entertainment, media, and tech not only favor many Democratic policies, but they also have highly Democratic workforces that push back against executives who back Republican politicians.

In addition to external factors that may have eroded a perceived GOP edge among corporate leaders, Republicans need some introspection. Republicans have long been better for business in terms of their political rhetoric. Democrats are and have been regular bashers of corporations. However, in recent years we have been seeing more anti-business rhetoric from Republicans as well. Democratic corporate bashing is still more common and more critical, but anti-business rhetoric from Republicans erodes a traditional area of Republican advantage.

Beyond the rhetoric, Democrats have long backed interventionist antitrust policies, while Republicans have been more enamored of the theories of Robert Bork, who argued that big is not bad as long as consumers benefit. In recent years, though, an increasing number of Republicans have sided with modern trustbusters like Federal Trade Commission head Lina Khan and said they want to break up big companies, particularly in the tech space.

The final factor is in terms of personal relationships. While Dwight Eisenhower felt close to “the gang,” his group of corporate executive golf-playing buddies, modern-day executives, especially in the tech and finance worlds, are more likely to find affinity with Democratic politicians. They will frequently have gone to the same schools, live in the same blue-bubble cities and suburbs, and share the same cultural interests. From many business leaders’ perspectives, Democrats may bash them, but as long as Republicans are bashing them as well, they might as well support the people that their kids go to school with.

The relationships between the main political parties and big business have long been complex—and are even more complex in our current era. But the pro-Harris letter reveals that Republicans have some work to do if they want to be seen as the pro-business party in future elections.

More must-read commentary published by Fortune:

  • Inflation, housing, immigration, taxes: The Harris-Walz economic policy scorecard
  • The ‘sustainability recession’ will end soon—and not by choice
  • ‘Godmother of AI’ says California’s well-intended AI bill will harm the U.S. ecosystem
  • The most underrated leadership skill, according to Jake Sullivan

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.

Fortune Brainstorm AI returns to San Francisco Dec. 8–9 to convene the smartest people we know—technologists, entrepreneurs, Fortune Global 500 executives, investors, policymakers, and the brilliant minds in between—to explore and interrogate the most pressing questions about AI at another pivotal moment. Register here.
About the Author
By Tevi Troy
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in Commentary

Amit Walia
CommentaryM&A
Why the timing was right for Salesforce’s $8 billion acquisition of Informatica — and for the opportunities ahead
By Amit WaliaDecember 6, 2025
31 minutes ago
Steve Milton is the CEO of Chain, a culinary-led pop-culture experience company founded by B.J. Novak and backed by Studio Ramsay Global.
CommentaryFood and drink
Affordability isn’t enough. Fast-casual restaurants need a fandom-first approach
By Steve MiltonDecember 5, 2025
1 day ago
Paul Atkins
CommentaryCorporate Governance
Turning public companies into private companies: the SEC’s retreat from transparency and accountability
By Andrew BeharDecember 5, 2025
1 day ago
Matt Rogers
CommentaryInfrastructure
I built the first iPhone with Steve Jobs. The AI industry is at risk of repeating an early smartphone mistake
By Matt RogersDecember 4, 2025
2 days ago
Jerome Powell
CommentaryFederal Reserve
Fed officials like the mystique of being seen as financial technocrats, but it’s time to demystify the central bank
By Alexander William SalterDecember 4, 2025
2 days ago
Rakesh Kumar
CommentarySemiconductors
China does not need Nvidia chips in the AI war — export controls only pushed it to build its own AI machine
By Rakesh KumarDecember 3, 2025
3 days ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Economy
Two months into the new fiscal year and the U.S. government is already spending more than $10 billion a week servicing national debt
By Eleanor PringleDecember 4, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Success
‘Godfather of AI’ says Bill Gates and Elon Musk are right about the future of work—but he predicts mass unemployment is on its way
By Preston ForeDecember 4, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Success
Nearly 4 million new manufacturing jobs are coming to America as boomers retire—but it's the one trade job Gen Z doesn't want
By Emma BurleighDecember 4, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Success
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang admits he works 7 days a week, including holidays, in a constant 'state of anxiety' out of fear of going bankrupt
By Jessica CoacciDecember 4, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Big Tech
Mark Zuckerberg rebranded Facebook for the metaverse. Four years and $70 billion in losses later, he’s moving on
By Eva RoytburgDecember 5, 2025
21 hours ago
placeholder alt text
Real Estate
‘There is no Mamdani effect’: Manhattan luxury home sales surge after mayoral election, undercutting predictions of doom and escape to Florida
By Sasha RogelbergDecember 4, 2025
2 days ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.