Trump-Harris debate skimps on substance, leaving CEOs with big questions

Diane BradyBy Diane BradyExecutive Editorial Director, Fortune Live Media and author of CEO Daily
Diane BradyExecutive Editorial Director, Fortune Live Media and author of CEO Daily

Diane Brady is an award-winning business journalist and author who has interviewed newsmakers worldwide and often speaks about the global business landscape. As executive editorial director of the Fortune CEO Initiative, she brings together a growing community of global business leaders through conversations, content, and connections. She is also executive editorial director of Fortune Live Media and interviews newsmakers for the magazine and the CEO Daily newsletter.

Joey AbramsBy Joey AbramsAssociate Production Editor
Joey AbramsAssociate Production Editor

    Joey Abrams is the associate production editor at Fortune.

    Trump and Harris sparred at their first debate at The National Constitution Center on Sept. 10, 2024 in Philadelphia.
    Trump and Harris sparred at their first debate at The National Constitution Center on Sept. 10, 2024 in Philadelphia.
    Win McNamee/Getty Images

    Good morning! 

    The first televised presidential debates between John Kennedy and Richard Nixon in 1960 had a moderator seated at a comically small desk and a mood more evocative of a classroom than a TV studio. The candidates earnestly presented their views on salaries, health care, education, trade, farming, Russia and other policies. As Nixon put it: “The people now have the opportunity to evaluate his, as against mine, and I think both he and I will abide by what the people decide.” (The Watergate scandal, of course, came later.)  

    Contrast that with last night’s presidential debate, which was more akin to the schoolyard. Although it began with Kamala Harris initiating the first handshake in a debate in eight years, it devolved into taunts and rhetoric. Little was said about issues like taxation, trade policy, regulation, legal immigration, and debt. No one mentioned the potential cost of Donald Trump’s trade war or Harris’s new tax plan. With less than two months until the election and days to go before early voting starts in Pennsylvania, a lot is still unknown about how and where the candidates plan to invest in growth.  

    After the debate, I spoke with Stagwell CEO and Harris Poll chairman Mark Penn. He is a former top advisor to the Clintons who now works with CEOs and business leaders on how to build brands and navigate across the aisle in this polarized time. He, too, was underwhelmed by the content. Said Penn: “If you’re in the tech industry, what did you learn? Nothing. If you’re in the manufacturing industry, your focus is on the tariffs. In the health care industry, you’re probably more suspicious of her than you are of Trump, but she didn’t outline much of a policy. If you’re in the finance industry, you’d look for more clarity around spending and taxes.”  

    While some Americans may not feel it, the U.S. economy is the envy of the world, with relatively low unemployment, healthy wages, deep pools of capital, and an embrace of new technologies. Government plays a leading role in creating a culture that attracts excellence, rewards risk, allows for failure, and upholds the rule of law while protecting the environment and rights of all citizens. At a time of seismic challenges and opportunities, people deserve more details about the philosophy and policies of their future president before they vote. 

    Taylor Swift is free to endorse a candidate but most CEOs prefer to stay anonymous on political preferences to promote harmony and avoid a backlash. When a few weighed in after the debate, at my request, the common theme was disappointment. “I wonder if either of them would have my back in a fight,” said one CEO who works in the Midwest. 

    “It’s a close race, and you have to make a judgment about what their real policies are,” says Penn. 

    More news below. 

    Diane Brady
    diane.brady@fortune.com
    Follow on LinkedIn

    TOP NEWS

    Nextdoor CEO talks up "founder mentality"

    In a new commentary piece for Fortune, Nextdoor co-founder Nirav Tolia said company leaders with a “founder mentality” are more successful because they are obsessed with the nitty gritty of their companies and stay accountable for its success. Tolia refers to CEOs like Steve Jobs, Sam Walton, and Oprah Winfrey as examples.

    Goldman Sachs eyes Georgia as make-or-break election state

    Two Goldman Sachs analysts released a note on Tuesday claiming that Georgia will be the deciding factor in the race between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump. The analysts say that Harris can win by taking either Georgia or Pennsylvania, while Trump must win both states. Fortune

    Used EVs are cheaper than their gas companions

    The average price of a used electric vehicle is now 11% cheaper than used gas cars ($26,839 vs. $30,292), according to a new study from iSeeCars. The study found that the Tesla Model 3 saw the biggest depreciation in value—24.8%—though EV cars largely depreciated slower than they did last year. Fortune

    AROUND THE WATERCOOLER

    Fed vice-chair slashes proposed capital cushion for JPMorgan, Bank of America, and Citigroup by over 50% by Michael del Castillo

    Kevin O’ Leary gives money to family–but there’s a catch by Marco Quiroz-Gutierrez

    The age of a Fortune 500 company is only part of its story by Lydia Belanger

    Bank of America CEO says we need to take action on the national debt now, while ‘we’re in relatively good times’ by Will Daniel

    Investors are pouring into leveraged ETFs to double up on Nvidia and Tesla—but risk getting burned by Greg McKenna

    This edition of CEO Daily was curated by Joey Abrams.

    This is the web version of CEO Daily, a newsletter of must-read global insights from CEOs and industry leaders. Sign up to get it delivered free to your inbox.