In the U.S., antitrust is the issue. According to the New York Times, the Federal Trade Commission and Justice Department have struck a deal to open investigations into the biggest AI players. The DOJ will probe how Nvidia has come to thoroughly own the AI chip market, while the FTC will look into OpenAI and its maybe-BFF Microsoft, which has invested $13 billion into OpenAI in exchange for a cut of its profits (at least, until OpenAI produces superhuman “artificial general intelligence.”)

“One of the things to think through is conflict of interest, a thumb on the scale, because [chipmakers] fear enabling a competitor or are helping to prop up a customer,” DOJ antitrust chief Jonathan Kanter told the Financial Times.

In Europe, privacy is the biggest thing today (though regulators are also examining antitrust issues in AI.) As I reported in April, Max Schrems, the Austrian activist-lawyer who has had huge success tackling Meta/Facebook over its assorted privacy violations, has turned his attention to AI. In that case, Schrems’s privacy nonprofit Noyb filed an official complaint against OpenAI, claiming ChatGPT’s hallucinations violate the EU General Data Protection Regulation by handing out incorrect information about people. Now he’s going after his usual target.

Meta recently changed its European privacy policy to let the company use people’s public personal posts and media, and data from other online sources, for an unspecified “AI technology” that can share data with third parties. Noyb says this breaks the GDPR in multiple ways—people can only opt out from having this done, rather than being given the chance to give proper consent with an opt-in; and there’s no clear way for them to have the data deleted once it’s in the system; and it’s illegal to not clearly specify what will happen with the data.

Schrems: “Meta is basically saying that it can use ‘any data from any source for any purpose and make it available to anyone in the world’, as long as it’s done via ‘AI technology.’ This is clearly the opposite of GDPR compliance.” Asked for comment, a Meta spokesperson referred me to the blog post the company published when it announced the change to its privacy policy; the post claims that Meta’s AI expansion is done “in a responsible way that complies with privacy rules.”

Remember, Schrems has already destroyed two U.S.-EU deals that let American firms process Europeans’ personal data, and recently put an end to Meta’s attempt to charge European users for the privilege of not being tracked online. Remember too that the GDPR’s fines run up to 4% of global annual revenue—a much bigger deal for Meta than for OpenAI.

And now, phones.

A bunch of you are very much interested in trying a foldable smartphone. “If a smaller folded phone would fit better in my pockets, especially in my running shorts, then I’d be very interested,” said TP, while LN is waiting for the next version of Google’s Pixel Fold: “I really like a lot of the features on Pixels, so if I could get all those features plus have a foldable, I’d be willing to spend a fair amount.”

AG and his son both have Motorola Razr folding phones: “The cameras aren’t the best, but the phones work great, and they fit in my pockets easily and don’t bind if, say, I’m wearing jeans and take a high step up. Also, they have a non-slip coating on the outside making it easier to hold onto, so I don’t need to get a case for it.”

However, AS’s experiences with two Samsung Galaxy Flips mean he will not get another smartphone of this type: “The first one fell with a case, and the screen started delaminating from the fold outwards. Verizon replaced it with a new one. So far so good…The phone feels very sensitive to dropping i.e. if you drop it, you will most likely do irreparable damage to the screen. At least, that has been my experience, and this is now my fear. So, I ended up with a sturdy case. This makes the phone thick and heavy.”

“To do anything, you have to unfold it, so what’s the point of having it folded?” AS continued. “It’s almost like the worst of both worlds: folded it is unpractically thick and functionally useless…and unfolded, it’s just like any other phone.”

Thanks for the feedback! More news below.

David Meyer

Want to send thoughts or suggestions to Data Sheet? Drop a line here.

NEWSWORTHY

Amazon robotaxis. Amazon is nearly ready to launch a public taxi service in Las Vegas using its Zoox autonomous vehicles, Bloomberg reports. Waymo may already be offering commercial services of this kind, but this would be the first such deployment involving purpose-built robotaxis, rather than normal cars that have been retrofitted with sensors and software to make them capable of the task.

Google privacy boost. As of later this year, Google Maps will no longer store your location history in the cloud, tying the list of your visited locations to your phone instead of your Google account. This is explicitly a pro-privacy move, but, as The Verge reports, it also means you won’t be able to access your Google Maps Timeline (which lets you revisit the routes you’ve taken) via the web, once the change happens in December.

Bluesky meets Mastodon. Bluesky and Mastodon, two of the significant alternatives for those fleeing X, are both decentralized—but they use different protocols, so there’s been no easy cross-platform posting like there is with Threads and Mastodon, which both use the ActivityPub protocol. Until now, that is. As TechCrunch reports, software developer Ryan Barrett has released a new opt-in technology called Bridgy Fed that allows people on Bluesky (which uses the AT Protocol) and Mastodon to talk to one another.

ON OUR FEED

“Let’s go, Calypso! Take us to space and back.”

—NASA astronaut Sunita “Suni” Williams radios to mission control just before yesterday’s successful lift-off of the Boeing Starliner’s first manned mission, following seven years of delays. Williams and fellow astronaut Butch Wilmore are docking today at the International Space Station. Their capsule is called Calypso, but Williams may also have been referencing a classic Mamie Van Doren track.

IN CASE YOU MISSED IT

Soaring Nvidia briefly beats Apple’s $3 trillion valuation as it sets Wall Street barreling toward records, by the Associated Press

Microsoft’s chief scientist: Step aside, prompt engineers—AI will start prompting you instead, by Jaime Teevan (Commentary)

Why this chief technology officer put his retirement on hold when Intel’s CEO called with a daunting fix-it job, by John Kell

Fake AI-generated Biden robocalls creator makes first court appearance: ‘Maybe I’m a villain today, but I think in the end we get a better country’, by the Associated Press

How should kids use TikTok, Instagram and Snapchat? Between an outright ban or allowing free reign, parents are choosing slow, deliberate onboarding, by the Associated Press

BEFORE YOU GO

Humane fire risk. One doesn’t want to kick the Humane AI Pin when it’s down, but here’s some more bad news for the beleaguered wearable AI-assistant device that shipped earlier this year, earning dreadful reviews. Humane, which is reportedly trying to find a buyer, has now had to warn its customers not to use the gizmo’s charging case—an optional $149 add-on—because it might catch fire. As Engadget reports, Humane is (pardon) pinning the blame on a third-party vendor whose battery cells “may pose a fire safety risk,” and offering customers two free months’ worth of subscription to the Humane AI Pin service.