Will AI increase inequality as much as the last tech boom? Maybe not

Nicholas GordonBy Nicholas GordonAsia Editor
Nicholas GordonAsia Editor

Nicholas Gordon is an Asia editor based in Hong Kong, where he helps to drive Fortune’s coverage of Asian business and economics news.

Vector of a manager hand drawing an arrow assisting businesswoman to achieve success in competition with businessman and AI.
AI can potentially level the playing field, spreading out decision-making power more evenly.
Getty Images

Good morning.

If you are interested in the question of whether AI will destroy good jobs, you should read this essay by David Autor, published last month in Noema Magazine. Autor is one of the leading thinkers and researchers on the subject of technology and labor, and his deep dive into the data on this subject provides as good a guide as you will find today.

First, will AI lead to fewer jobs? On this, Autor’s answer is unqualified: No. At least not anytime soon. “The industrialized world is awash in jobs, and it’s going to stay that way…Due to plummeting birth rates and a cratering labor force, a comparable labor shortage is unfolding across the industrialized world (including in China). That’s not a prediction. It’s a demographic fact.”

A second question—and to me the more interesting one—is this: Will AI continue the trend toward increasing inequality that accompanied the last wave of technology? Here, Autor’s answer is more qualified: Maybe not. But it’s the deep analysis that makes this long read worth the time. My (paltry) summary below.

In the early days of the Information Age, there were many who argued that computers would “flatten economic hierarchies by democratizing information.” Instead, the opposite happened. Says Autor: “Information, it turns out, is merely an input for a more consequential economic function, decision-making, which is the province of elite experts—typically the minority of U.S. adults who hold college or graduate degrees.” As a result, the premium paid to experts skyrocketed, and inequality increased.

But AI offers a way to expand decision-making expertise. It enables a larger group of workers—and here’s a key phrase: “equipped with necessary foundational skills”—to “perform higher-stake decision-making tasks currently arrogated to elite experts, such as doctors, lawyers, software engineers and college professors. In essence, AI—used well—can assist with restoring the middle-skill, middle-class heart” of the labor market.

Autor compares AI to a pneumatic nail gun in the hands of a roofer. It doesn’t eliminate the demand for roofers, but it greatly increases their productivity. He also uses nurse practitioners as an easy-to-understand example. Armed with appropriate AI tools, their ability to do work once limited to doctors greatly expands.

Is Autor’s analysis correct? It’s still early days for AI, and there no doubt will be surprises along the way. But there is reason to be optimistic. 

And check out Jessica Mathews’ latest probing piece on why the Elon Musk-inspired vision of a transportation Hyperloop is running aground.

Other news below.


Alan Murray
@alansmurray

alan.murray@fortune.com

TOP NEWS

Billionaire blow-up

Late last month, shareholders in Indian ed-tech firm Byju’s—once India’s most valuable startup—voted to oust its CEO, founder Byju Raveendran. It’s the latest twist in Byju’s years-long fall from the heady heights of the pandemic, including allegations of a toxic work culture and unethical sales tactics (both of which the company denies). Byju’s success was “all a hype, an illusion,” said one former employee. Fortune

Amazon puts the squeeze on sellers

Amazon is charging new fees to third-party retailers on its platform, which sellers say make it “increasingly difficult to sell” on the platform. New charges include a fee on packages entering Amazon’s network and a penalty for low inventory levels. Goods sold by third-party sellers now outsell goods sold directly by Amazon on the company’s e-commerce platform; about a quarter of Amazon’s revenue comes from fees charged to these small retailers. Fortune

Boeing needs Spirit

Boeing is in discussions to buy Spirit AeroSystems, the supplier that made the door plug that was ripped off an Alaska Airlines flight in January. A deal, if it happens, would reverse Boeing’s decision to outsource much of its manufacturing; Spirit was born from Boeing’s decision to sell some of its factories in 2005. Boeing is under pressure to convince customers and regulators that its planes are safe to fly. The Wall Street Journal

AROUND THE WATERCOOLER

He saw the horrors of PTSD after serving in Iraq. Now this former Goldman Sachs analyst has a startup aimed at improving mental health treatment by Shawn Tully

TikTok’s big Shop push hinges on getting users to click on advertorial videos—and so far, they’re reluctant, study finds by Alexandra Sternlicht 

Netflix is reinventing its business. From video games to live sports, these 10 insiders are building Netflix 3.0 by Rachyl Jones

Japan lost its early lead in chips to companies in Korea and Taiwan. Now a new TSMC project could lead the way to ‘a renaissance of semiconductors’ by Lionel Lim

Meet Europe’s answer to the ‘Magnificent 7’—the high-flying ‘Granolas’ that Goldman Sachs is betting will prosper in the continent’s flatlining economy by Ryan Hogg 

A new kind of remote work city just drove a $2 trillion gain in the housing market. ‘Pricey metros and pandemic boomtowns’ are drifting, Redfin finds by Alena Botros

This edition of CEO Daily was curated by Nicholas Gordon. 

This is the web version of CEO Daily, a newsletter of must-read insights from Fortune CEO Alan Murray. Sign up to get it delivered free to your inbox.