This week, after authorities traced the origin of a recent COVID-19 outbreak in Beijing to the Xinfadi fresh food market in the city’s Fengtai District, the nearby port of Tianjin has begun testing all meat imports for the coronavirus, threatening to disrupt exports from the U.S.
According to Reuters, all containers carrying imported meat into Tianjin—a metropolis 70 miles from Beijing—are being opened so authorities can perform nucleic acid tests on every box of meat. Currently, the fastest tests available for humans can return a result in 15 minutes, but it’s unclear what scale of delays the new vetting procedures will introduce at the docks.
The latest outbreak—Beijing’s first in two months—has so far caused a cluster of more than 130 infections, prompting the capital to implement “wartime emergency” lockdown measures once again.
The surge also sparked a boycott of imported salmon, after officials found traces of the novel coronavirus on a fishmonger’s chopping board inside the wet market. Authorities shuttered seafood markets across the city, fearing more outbreaks spawned by salmon.
Initial reports from China’s Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) claimed that Beijing’s latest coronavirus outbreak was of a European strain. On Thursday, Norway’s seafood association reported exports of salmon had dropped 34% in the past week. On Wednesday, however, Norway’s fisheries minister said both Norway and China had concluded salmon was not the source of the virus.
Now it seems China’s suspicion has turned to all meat imports. Shanghai’s municipal government declared on Wednesday that it would strengthen inspections of food imports too but stopped short of announcing widespread testing. Ordinarily, authorities would test a portion of each batch.
The increased scrutiny at Tianjin comes despite experts saying it’s unlikely the outbreak was caused by meat imports. Frank Yiannas, deputy commissioner for food policy and response at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, said on Twitter that the FDA is aware of reports that China will “begin testing foods” but added there is “currently no evidence of the transmission of COVID-19 through food.”
China’s meat imports, especially pork, have surged in the past year as the country emerges from an African swine fever pandemic that decimated domestic pig stocks. In the first four months of the year, China imported 1.35 million tons of pork, up 170% from the same period last year. U.S. butchers have benefited from the uptick.
In April Smithfield—which is owned by China’s WH Group—exported 9,170 tons of pork to China, which the New York Times says is one of the company’s highest monthly export volumes in the past three years. In that same month, Smithfield plants in the U.S. became hotbeds of coronavirus infection.
If Chinese consumer sentiment turns against foreign meat imports, it could prove a major blow to U.S. exporters. But connecting the coronavirus to meat imports would raise issues for China too, INTL FCStone’s senior commodities analyst Darin Friedrichs wrote in a note Monday.
“China needs imports to help keep meat inflation under control. [If there is a risk of importing the coronavirus] there would need to be some increased safety measures [for the] handling and processing of imported meat. But implementing measures like that, and making changes to the supply chain, could be disruptive,” the note said.
More must-read international coverage from Fortune:
- George Floyd protests, coronavirus face masks pose challenges for facial recognition
- From beekeepers to giant pension funds, activist shareholders are being silenced by the coronavirus
- Social distancing in the skies, temperature checks on the ground: Welcome to the new era of air travel
- To recover from COVID-19, Europe wants more 5G
- London’s Savile Row exported bespoke British suits to the one percent. Can it survive in a socially distanced world?
