Adelson, Israeli Banks Must Defend Palestinians’ U.S. Suit

February 19, 2019, 8:09 PM UTC
Friends Of The Israel Defense Forces (FIDF) Western Region Gala
Shahar Azran Getty Images

Bank Leumi Le-Israel BM, Bank Hapoalim BM, and billionaire Sheldon Adelson must defend a lawsuit in the U.S. accusing them of conspiring to force Palestinians out of Israeli-occupied territories and of war crimes, a U.S. appeals court ruled.

The unanimous ruling Tuesday by a three-judge panel reinstates a 2016 lawsuit dismissed by a trial judge for raising what she said were political questions for which the court had no authority, including who has sovereignty over the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip.

The ruling raises the prospect whether a U.S. court has to determine Israeli settlers committed war crimes and whether those targeted in the suit are financially liable. U.S. Circuit Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson said in her decision that the sovereignty issue was separate from a broader question of whether war crimes, including genocide, were being committed there.

“A legal determination that Israeli settlers commit genocide in the disputed territory would not decide ownership of the disputed territory and thus would not directly contradict any foreign policy choice,” Henderson said in a ruling joined by U.S. Circuit judges Nina Pillard and Harry Edwards.

The U.S. has taken no official position on the land-ownership dispute.

The Palestinians who are suing claim the banks, Adelson and others plotted to funnel millions of dollars to Israeli settlements, which spent the money to kill Palestinians and confiscate their property.

The defendants include Oracle Corp. founder Larry Ellison, former Philadelphia Eagles owner Norman Braman, the telecommunications company Motorola Solutions Inc., the Re/Max real estate company, construction firms, and former U.S. Deputy National Security Adviser Elliot Abrams.

Re/Max is accused of marketing former Arab-owned houses to potential U.S. and Israeli buyers, while Motorola allegedly sold security systems for the gated communities. Neither company’s representatives replied to requests for comment on the decision or allegations.

Abrams, accused of being a “self-appointed U.S. spokesman” for the Israeli settlements, is on leave from his Council on Foreign Relations fellowship. His office referred inquiries about the suit to the U.S. State Department, which didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Adelson is accused of contributing money toward the “violent expulsion” of the Palestinian population. Neither he nor the banks responded to requests for comment. Braman and Ellison also didn’t respond to requests for comment.

The case is Al-Tamimi v. Adelson, 17-5207, U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia (Washington).