• Home
  • Latest
  • Fortune 500
  • Finance
  • Tech
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
Commentarypolice

Trump Is Trying to Militarize the Police. It Won’t Make Us Any Safer.

By
Alex S. Vitale
Alex S. Vitale
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Alex S. Vitale
Alex S. Vitale
Down Arrow Button Icon
August 29, 2017, 5:18 PM ET

President Donald Trump and Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced this week that they will be suspending a handful of restrictions put in place by the Obama administration on transfers of equipment from the military to local police. While this decision is a setback for efforts to improve police community relations, its effects are primarily symbolic.

The federal 1033 Program allows local police departments to request excess equipment from the Defense Department. Everything from microwaves to helicopters is included on the extensive shopping lists distributed to police. Since its creation in 1997, the program has distributed over $5 billion worth of hardware to over 8,000 police departments.

Following the militarized policing of protests in Ferguson, Mo. in 2014, police accountability activists and civil liberties advocates on the right and left raised serious concerns about the appropriateness of much of this hardware for civilian police forces. In addition to the bad optics, critics pointed out that this program, combined with the Department of Homeland Security’s “terrorism grants” worth another $35 billion, have contributed to a militarization of domestic policing and the rise of a warrior mentality.

Over the last generation there has been an explosion in the prevalence and mission of SWAT teams and other paramilitary police units. Radley Balko, in his book The Rise of the Warrior Cop, shows how these units generally lack appropriate enforcement activities, so have creeped into new areas such as serving low-level drug warrants and intimidating protesters.

This kind of policing and the extensive training that goes with it tends to treat every police encounter as potentially deadly and instills an “us versus them” ethos within police ranks. That, combined with a robust “war on drugs,” “war on crime,” and “war on terror” has created a growing gulf between citizens and the police that is especially true in communities of color.

The Obama administration recognized how this warrior mindset is contributing to poor police community relations and argued that it should be replaced with a guardian mindset that more closely mirrors a “to serve and protect” approach that many feel has been abandoned in recent years.

In response, the Obama administration placed some restrictions on the hardware that can be transferred. Tracked vehicles, bayonets, and grenade launchers would no longer be allowed. Mine-resistant vehicles, sniper rifles, and military transport planes, however, remained available with few questions asked. In fact the Government Accounting Office, as part of an audit, recently obtained $1.2 million worth of military grade equipment from the Defense Department under assumed names and made up police departments.

The Obama-era reforms were so thin, in fact, that they have done little to turn back the tide of police militarization. Departments continue to obtain billions of dollars of military equipment to be used primarily for paramilitary police units. Some departments have even voluntarily sworn off the newly reauthorized equipment. The Los Angeles Police Department announced this week that it has no interest in obtaining camouflaged uniforms or .50 caliber ammunition that was prohibited by the Obama reforms, since they have no legitimate law enforcement purpose and undermine public trust in the police.

So why then are Trump and Sessions championing these changes as a boon to public safety? Because it is part of the political theater of punishment and control. Sessions’s ramping up of the war on drugs, and Trump’s pardon of Sheriff Joe Arpaio are not about enhancing public safety; they are appeals to a politics of anger and resentment that is tied to a belief that the only way to solve public safety problems is through “getting tough.” Trump and Sessions are encouraging their supporters, including many police officers, to embrace a politics of branding immigrants, people of color, and people who commit crime as beyond the pale and deserving of the harshest of sanctions. It is this mindset that is the real threat to public safety.

Former police officer and now law professor Seth Stoughton tweeted Monday that this change “isn’t about getting [officers] tools they didn’t have & couldn’t get.” He continued, “Instead, it’s [about] promoting a toxic approach to policing, one that reduces trust & effectiveness and endangers officers & civilians alike.”

It’s time to take a much bigger step to end police militarization than the changes implemented by the Obama administration. The 1033 and Terrorism Grants programs should be abandoned or completely rethought. Given the catastrophe in Houston this week, it’s clear that what local officials really need from the federal government to enhance public safety are high-water vehicles and swift water rescue boats, not tanks and bayonets.

Alex S. Vitale is professor of sociology and coordinator of the Policing and Social Justice Project at Brooklyn College, and author of The End of Policing.

About the Author
By Alex S. Vitale
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in Commentary

Dr. Javier Cárdenas is the director of the Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute NeuroPerformance Innovation Center.
Commentaryconcussions
Fists, not football: There is no concussion protocol for domestic violence survivors
By Javier CárdenasDecember 12, 2025
12 hours ago
Gary Locke is the former U.S. ambassador to China, U.S. secretary of commerce, and governor of Washington.
CommentaryChina
China is winning the biotech race. Patent reform is how we catch up
By Gary LockeDecember 12, 2025
12 hours ago
millennial
CommentaryConsumer Spending
Meet the 2025 holiday white whale: the millennial dad spending $500+ per kid
By Phillip GoerickeDecember 12, 2025
12 hours ago
Sarandos
CommentaryAntitrust
Netflix, Warner, Paramount and antitrust: Entertainment megadeal’s outcome must follow the evidence, not politics or fear of integration
By Satya MararDecember 12, 2025
13 hours ago
CommentaryLeadership
Leading the agentic enterprise: What the next wave of AI demands from CEOs
By François Candelon, Amartya Das, Sesh Iyer, Shervin Khodabandeh and Sam RansbothamDecember 12, 2025
16 hours ago
Sarandos
CommentaryAntitrust
Netflix’s takeover of Warner Brothers is a nightmare for consumers
By Ike BrannonDecember 11, 2025
2 days ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Economy
Tariffs are taxes and they were used to finance the federal government until the 1913 income tax. A top economist breaks it down
By Kent JonesDecember 12, 2025
15 hours ago
placeholder alt text
Success
At 18, doctors gave him three hours to live. He played video games from his hospital bed—and now, he’s built a $10 million-a-year video game studio
By Preston ForeDecember 10, 2025
3 days ago
placeholder alt text
Success
Palantir cofounder calls elite college undergrads a ‘loser generation’ as data reveals rise in students seeking support for disabilities, like ADHD
By Preston ForeDecember 11, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Arts & Entertainment
'We're not just going to want to be fed AI slop for 16 hours a day': Analyst sees Disney/OpenAI deal as a dividing line in entertainment history
By Nick LichtenbergDecember 11, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Success
40% of Stanford undergrads receive disability accommodations—but it’s become a college-wide phenomenon as Gen Z try to succeed in the current climate
By Preston ForeDecember 12, 2025
11 hours ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
For the first time since Trump’s tariff rollout, import tax revenue has fallen, threatening his lofty plans to slash the $38 trillion national debt
By Sasha RogelbergDecember 12, 2025
7 hours ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.