• Home
  • Latest
  • Fortune 500
  • Finance
  • Tech
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
Leadership

5 Reasons Why Managers Need to Think Hard About the Skills Gap

Andrew Nusca
By
Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca
Editorial Director, Brainstorm and author of Fortune Tech
Down Arrow Button Icon
Andrew Nusca
By
Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca
Editorial Director, Brainstorm and author of Fortune Tech
Down Arrow Button Icon
July 24, 2017, 7:39 PM ET

Technology is changing everything faster than any of us could have imagined. Our jobs are just the tip of the iceberg.

How are we, the workers, supposed to stay on top of things?

How should managers think about keeping their employees skilled at what matters when “what matters” is constantly changing?

At Fortune’s Brainstorm Tech conference in Aspen, technology industry executives—Koru CEO Kristen Hamilton, MediaLink CEO Michael Kassan, General Assembly CEO Jake Schwartz, JetBlue Technology Ventures president Bonny Simi, and former Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer—gathered to discuss just that. Here’s what they said.

1. Because College Isn’t For Everyone, but Learning Is

There are 20,000 employees at JetBlue, Sims said, and 18,000 of them are hourly workers, from flight attendants to gate agents. Many of them have only a high school degree. They don’t want (or need) to go to college. Still, they want a career trajectory. “How do you keep them engaged over the course of a career when they’re making $20 an hour?” Sims asked.

If you’re JetBlue, you partner to offer college courses through the company. The airline has 750 students in that program. “We went from a turnover in the call center to 50% for this cohort down to almost nothing,” Sims said. “The engagement has gone through the roof.” No degree program necessary.

2. Because Skills Are Really a Talent Acquisition Issue

“A lot of our work has been with really large companies who frankly struggle with talent acquisition,” said General Assembly’s Schwartz. His company works to build internal academies for other companies and reskill their workers. Part of the challenge is the framing of the issue, he said. “This is a shift from learning being an L&D thing,” Schwartz said, using the acronym for learning and development, “which has tragically become sort of a procurement center with limited resources, to a talent acquisition problem.”

The problem? L&D efforts don’t get the kind of resources that talent efforts do, he said, which means skills retraining is at risk of underinvestment.

3. Because Companies Have the Technology to Measure It

“Corporations spend more on human capital than any other expense item,” Hamilton said. So why aren’t they as careful and quantitative—read: data analytics—with it as they are with everything else in the company? “If you bring in the right talent that’s the right performance fit, that’s a good start.”

(A fellow in the room concurred: “We have so much data on our employees. So much opportunity. Why go externally for talent when we have the same talent internally, if not better?”)

But you need to measure more than cognitive ability, Hamilton said. Things like soft skills. “You can hire a great engineer to write code,” Hamilton said, “but if they don’t have good judgment or are a good culture fit, that’s a problem.” The silver lining? Some soft skills can be learned.

Besides, “it’s about contextual learning,” she said. People learn when they have a problem to solve. So create a lifelong learning organization. “I think that’s where we do need to get,” Hamilton said. “It needs to not be a sideline, separate event.”

Mayer concurred. When she was making change at Yahoo, training on the job was key, she said. “We needed everyone on the team to really understand mobile,” she said. When she was at Google, the company would often hire Stanford University professors straight out of academia. “You go from full-time student to nothing,” Mayer said. “That’s something a lot of people don’t want. They want to continue learning.”

4. Because It’s Good for Business

“You get what you pay for,” Schwartz said. You can’t fit staff education into a tiny budget. “I see as part of my role helping HR reframe their jobs”—and in doing so, reframe their mind around the notion that spending $30,000 to $50,000 per person for education is actually cheap in the long run. The catch? You need learning engagement, and that requires the involvement of senior leadership and meaningful personal engagement. The result, Schwartz said, “gives you, frankly, a competitive advantage.”

Kassan agreed. “We’ve tried to take it into the boardroom,” he said. “When you look at the board makeup, the percentage of people with markedly different, transformational thinking is very small.” So if you’re facing digital transformation and skills retraining, consider making unusual additions to your board, such as a CMO, he said. Only then will you approach what former Microsoft COO Michael Turner calls “performing while transforming,” Kassan said.

5. Because It’s Good for America

Look at skills training as a matter of turnover and engagement, Sims said. There are societal implications to simply laying people off; it’s destabilizing.

“We need to become good corporate citizens,” Sims said, “and help transform America.”

About the Author
Andrew Nusca
By Andrew NuscaEditorial Director, Brainstorm and author of Fortune Tech
Instagram iconLinkedIn iconTwitter icon

Andrew Nusca is the editorial director of Brainstorm, Fortune's innovation-obsessed community and event series. He also authors Fortune Tech, Fortune’s flagship tech newsletter.

See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in Leadership

Donald Trump
HealthHealth Insurance
‘Tragedy in the making’: Top healthcare exec on why insurance will spike to subsidize a tax cut to millionaires and billionaires
By Nick LichtenbergDecember 12, 2025
6 hours ago
three men in suits, one gesturing
AIBrainstorm AI
The fastest athletes in the world can botch a baton pass if trust isn’t there—and the same is true of AI, Blackbaud exec says
By Amanda GerutDecember 12, 2025
7 hours ago
Brainstorm AI panel
AIBrainstorm AI
Creative workers won’t be replaced by AI—but their roles will change to become ‘directors’ managing AI agents, executives say
By Beatrice NolanDecember 12, 2025
7 hours ago
Ryan Serhant lifts his arms at the premiere of Owning Manhattan, his Netflix show
Successrelationships
Ryan Serhant, a real estate mogul who’s met over 100 billionaires, reveals his best networking advice: ‘Every room I go into, I use the two C’s‘
By Dave SmithDecember 12, 2025
9 hours ago
Fei-Fei Li, the "Godmother of AI," says she values AI skills more than college degrees when hiring software engineers for her tech startup.
AITech
‘Godmother of AI’ says degrees are less important in hiring than how quickly you can ‘superpower yourself’ with new tools
By Nino PaoliDecember 12, 2025
10 hours ago
C-SuiteFortune 500 Power Moves
Fortune 500 Power Moves: Which executives gained and lost power this week
By Fortune EditorsDecember 12, 2025
10 hours ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Economy
Tariffs are taxes and they were used to finance the federal government until the 1913 income tax. A top economist breaks it down
By Kent JonesDecember 12, 2025
16 hours ago
placeholder alt text
Success
At 18, doctors gave him three hours to live. He played video games from his hospital bed—and now, he’s built a $10 million-a-year video game studio
By Preston ForeDecember 10, 2025
3 days ago
placeholder alt text
Success
Palantir cofounder calls elite college undergrads a ‘loser generation’ as data reveals rise in students seeking support for disabilities, like ADHD
By Preston ForeDecember 11, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Arts & Entertainment
'We're not just going to want to be fed AI slop for 16 hours a day': Analyst sees Disney/OpenAI deal as a dividing line in entertainment history
By Nick LichtenbergDecember 11, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Success
40% of Stanford undergrads receive disability accommodations—but it’s become a college-wide phenomenon as Gen Z try to succeed in the current climate
By Preston ForeDecember 12, 2025
11 hours ago
placeholder alt text
Success
Apple cofounder Ronald Wayne sold his 10% stake for $800 in 1976—today it’d be worth up to $400 billion
By Preston ForeDecember 12, 2025
12 hours ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.