Leadership

Here’s What Economic Pundits Said on Twitter About the Vice Presidential Debate

By George Mannes
By Money
US-VOTE-DEBATE
Democratic candidate for Vice President Tim Kaine (L) and Republican candidate for Vice President Mike Pence gesture during the vice presidential debate at Longwood University in Farmville, Virginia on October 4, 2016. / AFP / Jewel SAMAD (Photo credit should read JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images)
Photograph by Jewel Samad—AFP/Getty Images

This article originally appeared on Money.com.

As Indiana governor Mike Pence and Virginia senator Tim Kaine clashed during Tuesday night’s debate, economists and economic pundits of various political stripes took shots at what the two vice-presidential candidates had to say about jobs, Social Security, and the overall economy. Here are some of the highlights:

Moderator Elaine Quijano of CBSNews started off discussion of the economy by citing a government watchdog’s report: “According to the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, neither of your economic plans will reduce the growing $19 trillion gross national debt. In fact, your plans would add even more to it.”

In response to Kaine’s and Pence’s dispute over whose plan would be better for balancing the federal judgment, here was the tweet from…that very same Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget:

Also at issue was Social Security: How can the system—a linchpin of retirement for most American senior citizens—be saved?

Adam Brandon, president of the free-enterprise, anti-big-government group FreedomWorks, took issue with Democrat Kaine’s defense of Social Security which he called “one of the greatest programs that the American government has ever done,” adding “Social Security has enabled people to retire with dignity and overwhelmingly not be in poverty.”

MIT professor Simon Johnson, former chief economist for the International Monetary Fund, objected to Pence’s evasions in response to Kaine’s criticism of his past support for privatizing Social Security:

Pence had support the free-market advocacy group Club for Growth, though: