Trump and Clinton Fumble on Free Trade

July 27, 2016, 4:39 PM UTC
This combination of file photos shows Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton(L)on June 15, 2016 and presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump on June 13, 2016. / AFP / dsk (Photo credit should read DSK/AFP/Getty Images)
Photograph by DSK—AFP via Getty Images

Which of the passages below is from which party’s official platform?

-No. 1. We “will use all our trade enforcement tools to hold China and other trading partners accountable because no country should be able to manipulate their currencies to gain a competitive advantage…. Trade agreements should crack down on the unfair and illegal subsidies other countries grant their businesses at the expense of ours.”

-No. 2. “We cannot allow China to continue its currency manipulation, exclusion of U.S. products from government purchases, and subsidization of Chinese companies to thwart American imports…. [Our nominee] will insist on parity in trade and stand ready to implement countervailing duties if other countries refuse to cooperate.”

The similarities of the parties’ stands on trade are even greater than these passages suggest. (No. 1 is from the Democrats’ platform, No. 2 from the GOP’s.) Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton have each gone far beyond the platform language in denouncing the Trans-Pacific Partnership and Nafta. The clear message they’re sending is hostility toward free trade. Over the past 70 years the world has achieved hard-won progress toward freer trade, and both candidates explicitly threaten to stop it dead in its tracks.

That’s an important problem. To say out loud what isn’t said often enough: Free trade is undeniably good for the economy, though the benefits are not distributed evenly. Trump and Clinton are hostile toward it because they’re trying to win the votes of Americans who blame trade agreements for taking away their jobs or the jobs of others, or for crushing their wages or benefits, or for hollowing out their towns.

Heaven knows all those things have happened, but trade isn’t the main reason. Whenever Trump, Clinton, or anyone else talks about bringing back manufacturing jobs by restricting trade, remember these facts:

The high water mark for U.S. manufacturing jobs was June 1979: There were 19,553,000 manufacturing workers that month, says the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Last month the number was 12,296,000. Yet today the U.S. produces manufactured goods worth 78% more in constant dollars than we produced in 1979. That is, we produce 78% more stuff with 37% fewer workers.

This is a global phenomenon. Everywhere on earth, every day, business people figure out how to make more stuff with fewer workers. That trend isn’t going to reverse.

Wise policy makers don’t bemoan this reality or try to bring back the past; instead they embrace economic change. Rusted-out old manufacturing towns can revive spectacularly – just look at Pittsburgh. But never again will America employ 19,553,000 manufacturing workers or any number remotely close. Trade deals didn’t eliminate most of the lost manufacturing jobs, and killing trade deals won’t bring them back. For Trump, Clinton, or anyone else to suggest otherwise is misleading and cruel.

This essay originally appeared in Power Sheet, Fortune’s daily newsletter on leadership.

Subscribe to Well Adjusted, our newsletter full of simple strategies to work smarter and live better, from the Fortune Well team. Sign up today.

Read More

Great ResignationDiversity and InclusionCompensationCEO DailyCFO DailyModern Board