• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
FinanceAutos

More on What GM Paid To Buy Cruise Automation

By
Dan Primack
Dan Primack
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Dan Primack
Dan Primack
Down Arrow Button Icon
July 21, 2016, 12:11 PM ET
Helena Price Photography

When General Motors announced in March that it was buying Cruise Automation, Fortune reported that the undisclosed purchase price was just over $1 billion. Today GM chief financial officer Chuck Stevens said in an earnings call that it only paid out $581 million (split between cash and stock).

In other words, we seem to have a pretty substantial discrepancy.

From what we can tell, the delta here is because GM (GM) is being very narrow in how it describes the deal value. The $581 million (or $600 million, whichever you prefer) is the cash and stock that actually went out the Detroit doors during GM’s second fiscal quarter. Not included were a variety of other things, including cash still being held in escrow, expected earn-out payments, employee retention packages and other expected employee compensation (particularly for those with unvested shares at the time of acquisition).

This is probably what Stevens was referring to when he said:

The deal consideration at closing was approximately $600 million with $300 million paid in cash during the quarter and the remaining $300 million paid through the issuance of new common stock. Additionally, we entered into other agreements associated with retention of key employees and performance based awards contingent on continued employment and or reaching certain milestones from a technology and a commercialization perspective.

Fortune has spoken with multiple sources this morning that we spoke with back in March, one of whom asked us to wait while he pulled out the deal documentation to double-check, and they reiterated the $1 billion purchase price.

A GM spokesman declined to get into specific numbers, but said that any payouts above the $581 million ― including earn-outs related to commercial or technological milestones ― are being considered by the company to be employment costs instead of acquisition costs.

About the Author
By Dan Primack
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.